Pub Date : 2023-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.ara.2023.100463
Adrian Cristian Ardelean , Adriana Sărășan , Andrei Bălărie , Kunbolot Akmatov , Kubatbek Tabaldiev , Ruben Wehrheim
Archaeological research in the Kyrghyz Tian Shan Mountains using state-of-the-art technology such as geophysical investigations and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) is still in its early stages. The current investigations have shed light on the complexity of burial grounds in the Suusamyr Plateau, where over 951 structures have withstood the test of time and now serve as a silent expression of ancient civilizations. This study utilized an integrative approach that combined UAV data and geophysical prospection to map surface and subsurface features. Of the identified structures, 68.2% are burial mounds, 93% of which are simple mounds and 7% of which are complex collared mounds. The typological diversity of the burial mounds suggests that they were constructed starting with the Late Bronze Age up to the Turkic period. Subsurface investigations at four sites supplemented surface information, revealing a complex pattern of outer rings of stone circles surrounding the large burial mounds. The combined approach consisting of aerial, ground level and subsurface investigations proved invaluable for gaining an integrative perspective of the Suusamyr Plateau burial grounds. Although excavation is needed for absolute chronology, this research offers insights into prehistoric cultures and underscores the importance of continued conservation efforts, given current anthropic threats.
{"title":"Above ground and underground – An integrated approach of the burial mounds within the Suusamyr plateau, Kyrgyzstan","authors":"Adrian Cristian Ardelean , Adriana Sărășan , Andrei Bălărie , Kunbolot Akmatov , Kubatbek Tabaldiev , Ruben Wehrheim","doi":"10.1016/j.ara.2023.100463","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ara.2023.100463","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Archaeological research in the Kyrghyz Tian Shan Mountains using state-of-the-art technology such as geophysical investigations and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) is still in its early stages. The current investigations have shed light on the complexity of burial grounds in the Suusamyr Plateau, where over 951 structures have withstood the test of time and now serve as a silent expression of ancient civilizations. This study utilized an integrative approach that combined UAV data and geophysical prospection to map surface and subsurface features. Of the identified structures, 68.2% are </span>burial mounds<span>, 93% of which are simple mounds and 7% of which are complex collared mounds. The typological diversity of the burial mounds suggests that they were constructed starting with the Late Bronze Age up to the Turkic period. Subsurface investigations at four sites supplemented surface information, revealing a complex pattern of outer rings of stone circles surrounding the large burial mounds. The combined approach consisting of aerial, ground level and subsurface investigations proved invaluable for gaining an integrative perspective of the Suusamyr Plateau burial grounds. Although excavation is needed for absolute chronology, this research offers insights into prehistoric cultures and underscores the importance of continued conservation efforts, given current anthropic threats.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":51847,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Research in Asia","volume":"35 ","pages":"Article 100463"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44339824","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.ara.2023.100466
Anton Anoikin , Petr Sosin , Andrei Rybalko , Tura Khudjageldiev , Abdullo Sharipov , Asliddin Karayev , Ekaterina Kulakova , Olga Meshcheryakova , Olga Tokareva , Redzhep Kurbanov
Opening of series of sites of Loess Palaeolithic in Central Asia, found within a different levels of loess-palaeosol sequences of Tajikistan, was a great step in understanding history of hominin dispersal in Eurasia. The highest density of Loessic Palaeolithic sites is recorded in the Khovaling Loess Plateau. In 2021 a Russian-Tajik geoarchaeological expedition carried out an archaeological survey and discovered an area rich in stone artefacts, concentrated in pedocomplexes 5, which was excavated and called Lakhuti-IV. All archaeological material at the Lakhuti-IV site was associated with pedocomplex 5, consisting of two well developed palaeosols reflecting different climatic phases of the interglacial period. The stratigraphic occurrence and the typological characteristics of the assemblage indicate a single industry. Several knapping technologies are recorded in the primary knapping: radial, slice and simple parallel. From the existing geochronological data for the Khovaling Loess Plateau, cultural layer of Lakhuti-IV is correlated with MIS 13 (∼0.5 Ma). A distinctive feature of Lakhuti-IV, and one which distinguishes it from the entire assemblages of the Palaeolithic sites in the Khovaling Loess Plateau, is the high concentration of artefacts. Another unique feature of the site is that here, for the first time in the Loessic Palaeolithic of Central Asia artefacts are found in several distinct cultural horizons within the same pedocomplex, i.e., within the same climatic warm period.
{"title":"Lakhuti-IV – A new site of the early Palaeolithic in Central Asia (Tajikistan)","authors":"Anton Anoikin , Petr Sosin , Andrei Rybalko , Tura Khudjageldiev , Abdullo Sharipov , Asliddin Karayev , Ekaterina Kulakova , Olga Meshcheryakova , Olga Tokareva , Redzhep Kurbanov","doi":"10.1016/j.ara.2023.100466","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ara.2023.100466","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Opening of series of sites of Loess Palaeolithic in Central Asia, found within a different levels of loess-palaeosol sequences of Tajikistan, was a great step in understanding history of hominin dispersal in Eurasia. The highest density of Loessic Palaeolithic sites is recorded in the Khovaling Loess Plateau. In 2021 a Russian-Tajik geoarchaeological expedition carried out an archaeological survey and discovered an area rich in stone artefacts, </span> <span>concentrated in pedocomplexes 5, which was excavated and called Lakhuti-IV. All archaeological material at the Lakhuti-IV site was associated with pedocomplex 5, consisting of two well developed palaeosols reflecting different climatic phases of the interglacial period. The stratigraphic occurrence and the typological characteristics of the assemblage indicate a single industry<span>. Several knapping technologies are recorded in the primary knapping: radial, slice and simple parallel. From the existing geochronological data for the Khovaling Loess Plateau, cultural layer of Lakhuti-IV is correlated with MIS 13 (∼0.5 Ma). A distinctive feature of Lakhuti-IV, and one which distinguishes it from the entire assemblages of the Palaeolithic sites in the Khovaling Loess Plateau, is the high concentration of artefacts. Another unique feature of the site is that here, for the first time in the Loessic Palaeolithic of Central Asia artefacts are found in several distinct cultural horizons within the same pedocomplex, i.e., within the same climatic warm period.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":51847,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Research in Asia","volume":"35 ","pages":"Article 100466"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43451834","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.ara.2023.100462
Arina M. Khatsenovich , Evgeny P. Rybin , Yadmaa Tserendagva , Dashzeveg Bazargur , Ganbold Margad-Erdene , Daria V. Marchenko , Byambaa Gunchinsuren , John W. Olsen , Anatoly P. Derevianko
Stratified Middle Paleolithic industries in Mongolia are mostly known from final Middle Paleolithic complexes in the Orkhon and Kharganyn Gol valleys in the north-central part of the country, while Middle Paleolithic sites in the Gobi Desert have not attracted as much attention. Re-analysis of archaeological collections made during excavations of Tsagaan Agui Cave in 1987–1989 have made it possible to define transitional specific tool types as well as the systems of primary flaking employed through different lithic complexes. Recent excavations of Tsagaan Agui in 2021 and 2022 place the lithic complexes first identified there in the 1980s into a more refined chronological sequence. Preliminary technological and typological analyses reveal the non-Levallois Mousterian character of the Middle Paleolithic industry at Tsagaan Agui Cave. Here, we attempt to identify analogs of this industry in Siberia and eastern Asia.
{"title":"The Middle Paleolithic of Tsagaan Agui Cave in the Gobi Altai region of Mongolia and its Siberian and Central Asian links","authors":"Arina M. Khatsenovich , Evgeny P. Rybin , Yadmaa Tserendagva , Dashzeveg Bazargur , Ganbold Margad-Erdene , Daria V. Marchenko , Byambaa Gunchinsuren , John W. Olsen , Anatoly P. Derevianko","doi":"10.1016/j.ara.2023.100462","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ara.2023.100462","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Stratified Middle Paleolithic </span>industries in Mongolia are mostly known from final Middle Paleolithic complexes in the Orkhon and Kharganyn Gol valleys in the north-central part of the country, while Middle Paleolithic sites in the Gobi Desert have not attracted as much attention. </span><em>Re</em><span>-analysis of archaeological collections made during excavations of Tsagaan Agui Cave in 1987–1989 have made it possible to define transitional specific tool types as well as the systems of primary flaking employed through different lithic complexes. Recent excavations of Tsagaan Agui in 2021 and 2022 place the lithic complexes first identified there in the 1980s into a more refined chronological sequence. Preliminary technological and typological analyses reveal the non-Levallois Mousterian character of the Middle Paleolithic industry at Tsagaan Agui Cave. Here, we attempt to identify analogs of this industry in Siberia and eastern Asia.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":51847,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Research in Asia","volume":"35 ","pages":"Article 100462"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49335296","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.ara.2023.100467
Nina A. Zhogova , Łukasz Oleszczak , Krzysztof Michalczewski , Igor Pieńkos , Gino Caspari
The identification of camp sites of Iron Age cultures on the Eurasian steppes has long been a problem as the traces of seasonal settlements are faint and often destroyed by agricultural activities. Recent research has found increasing evidence for less mobility and a larger role farming played in the mixed and locally adapted economies of peoples on the steppes. Here we present the results of the investigation of a settlement from the Uyuk Valley and contextualize it with data for seasonal camp sites and settlements in Iron Age South Siberia. Contrary to the long-held beliefs that Iron Age herding societies were truly nomadic and did not establish permanent settlements, archaeological research in South Siberia is gradually starting to reveal a different picture. Remote sensing and on-ground surveys uncovered six Scythian-period settlement sites in Tuva occupying southern hill slopes in sheltered topographic settings. Excavations at Zhelvak 5 revealed a stratified site with materials from the Bronze Age to the Late Iron Age and beyond. The archaeological material speaks towards continuity of economic exploitation of this landscape and the establishment of seasonal camp sites in the same place over a prolonged period of time.
{"title":"Identifying seasonal settlement sites and land use continuity in the prehistoric southern Siberian steppe – Zhelvak 5 (Tuva)","authors":"Nina A. Zhogova , Łukasz Oleszczak , Krzysztof Michalczewski , Igor Pieńkos , Gino Caspari","doi":"10.1016/j.ara.2023.100467","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ara.2023.100467","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The identification of camp sites of Iron Age cultures on the Eurasian steppes has long been a problem as the traces of seasonal settlements are faint and often destroyed by agricultural activities. Recent research has found increasing evidence for less mobility and a larger role farming played in the mixed and locally adapted economies of peoples on the steppes. Here we present the results of the investigation of a settlement from the Uyuk Valley and contextualize it with data for seasonal camp sites and settlements in Iron Age South Siberia. Contrary to the long-held beliefs that Iron Age herding societies were truly nomadic and did not establish permanent settlements, archaeological research in South Siberia is gradually starting to reveal a different picture. Remote sensing and on-ground surveys uncovered six Scythian-period settlement sites in Tuva occupying southern hill slopes in sheltered topographic settings. Excavations at Zhelvak 5 revealed a stratified site with materials from the Bronze Age to the Late Iron Age and beyond. The archaeological material speaks towards continuity of economic exploitation of this landscape and the establishment of seasonal camp sites in the same place over a prolonged period of time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51847,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Research in Asia","volume":"35 ","pages":"Article 100467"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44504323","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.ara.2023.100465
Metin I. Eren , Fernando Diez-Martin , Antonio Tarriño , Heather Smith , Briggs Buchanan , G. Logan Miller , Matthew Boulanger , Sergei Slobodin
The peopling process of North and South America started in Northeast Asia and was a cultural evolutionary event. An evolutionary approach to archaeology, however, begins with detailed description of assemblages. The Uptar site, Russia, played a prominent role in debates about New World colonization, due to the presence of a “fluted” bifacially flaked stone lanceolate. However, in recent years, Uptar has received less attention. We were given the opportunity to study a sample of the Uptar lithic assemblage, and here we compiled descriptions based on thin-sections for mineralogical and textural analyses; X-ray diffraction (XRD) for mineralogical identification; X-ray fluorescence (XRF) for geochemical analysis; computerized axial micro-tomography (MicroCT) for micro-textural analysis; technological descriptions; morphometric analysis of its bifaces; and microwear. At a very basic level, our reexamination of this Uptar lithic sample suggests that the site was potentially a re-tooling site, whereby used or broken tools were discarded and new tools were manufactured. We found little evidence of microblade technology in our sample. Our results also suggest that fluted-point technology continues to be absent in Northeast Asia, and that the precise relationship of Uptar to North American Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene cultures remains unknown. Most importantly, our report provides descriptive data that can be used by others in future comparative and meta analyses.
{"title":"Toolstone characterization, description, morphometrics, and microwear of a lithic sample from Uptar, Magadan Oblast, Northeastern Siberia, Russia","authors":"Metin I. Eren , Fernando Diez-Martin , Antonio Tarriño , Heather Smith , Briggs Buchanan , G. Logan Miller , Matthew Boulanger , Sergei Slobodin","doi":"10.1016/j.ara.2023.100465","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ara.2023.100465","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>The peopling process of North and South America started in Northeast Asia and was a cultural evolutionary event. An evolutionary approach to archaeology, however, begins with detailed description of assemblages. The Uptar site, Russia, played a prominent role in debates about New World colonization, due to the presence of a “fluted” bifacially flaked stone lanceolate. However, in recent years, Uptar has received less attention. We were given the opportunity to study a sample of the Uptar lithic assemblage, and here we compiled descriptions based on thin-sections for mineralogical and textural analyses; X-ray diffraction (XRD) for mineralogical identification; X-ray fluorescence (XRF) for geochemical analysis; computerized axial micro-tomography (MicroCT) for micro-textural analysis; technological descriptions; morphometric analysis of its bifaces; and microwear. At a very basic level, our reexamination of this Uptar lithic sample suggests that the site was potentially a re-tooling site, whereby used or broken tools were discarded and new tools were manufactured. We found little evidence of microblade technology in our sample. Our results also suggest that fluted-point technology continues to be absent in Northeast Asia, and that the precise relationship of Uptar to North American </span>Late Pleistocene and </span>Early Holocene cultures remains unknown. Most importantly, our report provides descriptive data that can be used by others in future comparative and meta analyses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51847,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Research in Asia","volume":"35 ","pages":"Article 100465"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43019869","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.ara.2023.100451
Patrick Wertmann , Maria Yibulayinmu , Mayke Wagner , Chris Taylor , Samira Müller , Dongliang Xu , Irina Elkina , Christian Leipe , Yonghong Deng , Pavel E. Tarasov
The invention of the saddle substantially improved horseback-riding, which not only revolutionized warfare, but also eased long-distance speedy movement across Eurasia. Here we present the first detailed construction analysis and absolute age determination of a well-preserved soft leather saddle recovered from the tomb of a female deceased at the Yanghai cemetery site in the Turfan Basin at the eastern end of the Tian Shan mountains. Compared with the oldest known saddle from the Scythian Pazyryk culture site Tuekta barrow no. 1 (430–420 BCE) in north-western Altai, the Yanghai specimen radiocarbon dated to 727–396 BCE (95.4% probability range) is contemporaneous or possibly older. The saddle features the basic elements of soft saddle construction that are still used today: two stuffed, wing-shaped hides sewn together along the outer edges and separated by a central gullet-like spacer and lens-shaped support elements, resembling knee and thigh rolls of modern saddles. Being a masterful piece of leather- and needlework, it is, however, less complex compared to Scythian saddles from the 5th–3rd centuries BCE. Another specimen from nearby Subeixi site, which is also described in detail for the first time in the present study, much closer resembles the Pazyryk saddles in shape, size and structure. In Yanghai, equestrian paraphernalia appear in the grave assemblages during the entire burial period (ca. 1300 BCE to 200 CE), although in higher numbers only from ca. 300 BCE. In the same way, the burial of horses was not common until then. Despite the generally very good preservation of leather, only two saddles were discovered in Yanghai which makes them an exception rather than the norm and raises the question of whether these saddles were acquired from more specialized horse breeders, riders, and saddlers in the North.
{"title":"The earliest directly dated saddle for horse-riding from a mid-1st millennium BCE female burial in Northwest China","authors":"Patrick Wertmann , Maria Yibulayinmu , Mayke Wagner , Chris Taylor , Samira Müller , Dongliang Xu , Irina Elkina , Christian Leipe , Yonghong Deng , Pavel E. Tarasov","doi":"10.1016/j.ara.2023.100451","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ara.2023.100451","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The invention of the saddle substantially improved horseback-riding, which not only revolutionized warfare, but also eased long-distance speedy movement across Eurasia. Here we present the first detailed construction analysis and absolute age determination of a well-preserved soft leather saddle recovered from the tomb of a female deceased at the Yanghai cemetery site in the Turfan Basin at the eastern end of the Tian Shan mountains. Compared with the oldest known saddle from the Scythian Pazyryk culture site Tuekta barrow no. 1 (430–420 BCE) in north-western Altai, the Yanghai specimen radiocarbon dated to 727–396 BCE (95.4% probability range) is contemporaneous or possibly older. The saddle features the basic elements of soft saddle construction that are still used today: two stuffed, wing-shaped hides sewn together along the outer edges and separated by a central gullet-like spacer and lens-shaped support elements, resembling knee and thigh rolls of modern saddles. Being a masterful piece of leather- and needlework, it is, however, less complex compared to Scythian saddles from the 5th–3rd centuries BCE. Another specimen from nearby Subeixi site, which is also described in detail for the first time in the present study, much closer resembles the Pazyryk saddles in shape, size and structure. In Yanghai, equestrian paraphernalia appear in the grave assemblages during the entire burial period (ca. 1300 BCE to 200 CE), although in higher numbers only from ca. 300 BCE. In the same way, the burial of horses was not common until then. Despite the generally very good preservation of leather, only two saddles were discovered in Yanghai which makes them an exception rather than the norm and raises the question of whether these saddles were acquired from more specialized horse breeders, riders, and saddlers in the North.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51847,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Research in Asia","volume":"35 ","pages":"Article 100451"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49762844","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.ara.2023.100460
Ergül Kodaş
Recent archaeological excavations in the Boncuklu Tarla, Çemka Höyük, and Körtik Tepe settlements in the Upper Tigris Basin have provided a number of finds from the pre-PPNA Period, the Younger Dryas. The new data also opens up the concept of the Proto-Neolithic Period to discussion again, which has been controversial for a long time in the East Jazeera and Northwest Zagros Region. In this context, architectural remains and other small finds discovered in the Boncuklu Tarla settlement area make it possible to re-examine the transition to sedentary life in the Upper Tigris Basin during the Late Epipalaeolithic/Proto-Neolithic Period and the PPNA Period. These archaeological finds show that there were some semi-sedentary or sedentary communities in the Upper Tigris Basin, which exhibits unique geographical and climatic features, starting with the Younger Dryas Period. This is different from the Natufian culture that is thought to have emerged in the Mediterranean temperate climate zone and is known only in the Southern Levant Region.
{"title":"The younger Dryas layer at Boncuklu Tarla and the beginning of village life in the upper Tigris Basin","authors":"Ergül Kodaş","doi":"10.1016/j.ara.2023.100460","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ara.2023.100460","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recent archaeological excavations<span> in the Boncuklu Tarla, Çemka Höyük, and Körtik Tepe settlements in the Upper Tigris Basin have provided a number of finds from the pre-PPNA Period, the Younger Dryas. The new data also opens up the concept of the Proto-Neolithic Period to discussion again, which has been controversial for a long time in the East Jazeera and Northwest Zagros Region. In this context, architectural remains and other small finds discovered in the Boncuklu Tarla settlement area make it possible to re-examine the transition to sedentary life in the Upper Tigris Basin during the Late Epipalaeolithic/Proto-Neolithic Period and the PPNA Period. These archaeological finds show that there were some semi-sedentary or sedentary communities in the Upper Tigris Basin, which exhibits unique geographical and climatic features, starting with the Younger Dryas Period. This is different from the Natufian culture that is thought to have emerged in the Mediterranean temperate climate zone and is known only in the Southern Levant Region.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":51847,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Research in Asia","volume":"35 ","pages":"Article 100460"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44755564","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-14DOI: 10.1016/j.ara.2023.100468
Meng Guo , Zhouyong Sun , Jing Shao
Shimao is among the largest settlements dating back to the late Longshan to early Bronze Age in Northern China. The Huangchengtai locality is often identified as the palace center of Shimao. The excavation of a large number of ceramic artifacts from this site presents an excellent opportunity to study Shimao's pottery technology. To understand the use of the potter's wheel and the traces left on ceramics, we conducted a comprehensive investigation of ceramics from the Huangchengtai locality. This investigation involved observing technological traces, X-ray photography, and microstructural analysis. The results revealed that the majority of the ceramic pots were made using the techniques of coiling and molding. However, a small portion of the pottery displayed techniques of throwing and turning. Interestingly, neither Shimao nor its neighbors had access to highly developed fast-wheel technology during that period. Moreover, many of the pots made on the potter's wheel in Shimao show a connection to pots found in the Longshan culture in the Central Plains. Therefore, it is likely that Shimao's fast-wheel technology originated from the Central Plains.
{"title":"Use of the potter's wheel at Shimao, Shaanxi, China","authors":"Meng Guo , Zhouyong Sun , Jing Shao","doi":"10.1016/j.ara.2023.100468","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ara.2023.100468","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Shimao is among the largest settlements dating back to the late Longshan to early Bronze Age in Northern China. The Huangchengtai locality is often identified as the palace center of Shimao. The excavation of a large number of ceramic artifacts from this site presents an excellent opportunity to study Shimao's pottery technology. To understand the use of the potter's wheel and the traces left on ceramics, we conducted a comprehensive investigation of ceramics from the Huangchengtai locality. This investigation involved observing technological traces, X-ray photography, and microstructural analysis. The results revealed that the majority of the ceramic pots were made using the techniques of coiling and molding. However, a small portion of the pottery displayed techniques of throwing and turning. Interestingly, neither Shimao nor its neighbors had access to highly developed fast-wheel technology during that period. Moreover, many of the pots made on the potter's wheel in Shimao show a connection to pots found in the Longshan culture in the Central Plains. Therefore, it is likely that Shimao's fast-wheel technology originated from the Central Plains.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51847,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Research in Asia","volume":"36 ","pages":"Article 100468"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49739134","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-14DOI: 10.1016/j.ara.2023.100469
Ali A. Vahdati
The mountainous region of Northern Khorasan province in northeastern Iran is rich in rock art sites including several petroglyph and rock-painting sites. Rock paintings at the Zeynekānlu- Mardkānlu rock-shelters and Bāsh Mahalle near Fāruj are newly recorded pictographic sites in the Atrak River Basin depicting zoomorphic and geometric imagery. While the panel at Zeynekānlu shows several mountain goats possibly in a net hunting scene, the nearby Mardkānlu rock-shelters as well as the rock paintings at Bāsh Mahalle depict simple signs and geometric shapes that are difficult to interpret. On stylistic grounds, the Zeynekānlu pictograms appear to date to the Late Chalcolithic (c. 3500 BCE) or Early Bronze Age (c.3000 BCE) and the Mardkānlu and Bāsh Mahalle pictograms seem to relate to the Late Iron Age (c. 6th-2nd cent. BCE), possibly with later additions in late antiquity and the Early Middle Ages (c. 3rd-8th centuries CE). Whatever date they are assigned, the rock paintings of the Upper Atrak valley, predominantly located in foothill and highland zones, can be linked to pastoral models of subsistence in the past.
{"title":"Newly found rock painting sites in the upper Atrak Valley, Northern Khorasan, North- eastern Iran","authors":"Ali A. Vahdati","doi":"10.1016/j.ara.2023.100469","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ara.2023.100469","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>The mountainous region of Northern Khorasan province in northeastern Iran is rich in rock art sites including several petroglyph<span><span> and rock-painting sites. Rock paintings at the Zeynekānlu- Mardkānlu rock-shelters and Bāsh Mahalle near Fāruj are newly recorded pictographic sites in the Atrak River Basin depicting zoomorphic and geometric imagery. While the panel at Zeynekānlu shows several mountain goats possibly in a net </span>hunting scene, the nearby Mardkānlu rock-shelters as well as the rock paintings at Bāsh Mahalle depict simple signs and geometric shapes that are difficult to interpret. On </span></span>stylistic<span><span> grounds, the Zeynekānlu pictograms appear to date to the Late Chalcolithic (c. 3500 BCE) or Early </span>Bronze Age (c.3000 BCE) and the Mardkānlu and Bāsh Mahalle pictograms seem to relate to the Late Iron Age (c. 6th-2nd cent. BCE), possibly with later additions in late antiquity and the Early Middle Ages (c. 3rd-8th centuries CE). Whatever date they are assigned, the rock paintings of the Upper Atrak valley, predominantly located in foothill and highland zones, can be linked to pastoral models of subsistence in the past.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":51847,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Research in Asia","volume":"36 ","pages":"Article 100469"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49739395","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In recent years more than 20 new Palaeolithic sites have been discovered on the Caucasian coast of the Caspian Sea, in Dagestan, including several multilayer stratified sites. Broad chronological range archaeological and geological studies have allowed the description of stone industries from the beginning of the Lower Palaeolithic to the beginning of the Upper Palaeolithic, covering almost the entire Pleistocene. Preliminary geological, palaeomagnetic and biostratigraphic data suggest the age of the oldest stage of hominin occupation of the region is recorded in the lower layer of the Rubas-1 site which is tentatively correlated with the Late Akchagylian era of the Caspian Sea (MIS 76–64, ∼2.2–1.8 Ma). Lower Palaeolithic layers are identified and described in Darvagchay-1 (∼0.6 Ma), Darvagzhay-zaliv-1 (∼0.6 Ma) and Darvagchay-zaliv-4 (0.4–0.3 Ma). The Middle Palaeolithic is recorded in several cultural layers, all of similar age (∼130–110 ka), at the Rubas-1 and Darvagchay river valley sites. The youngest episode of human Palaeolithic occupation of Dagestan coastal area is identified at the Tinit-1 site, with a lithic assemblage of the Terminal Middle Palaeolithic. Our work add to the few existing studies and suggest that, like other parts of the Caucasus, the region was occupied repeatedly during the Palaeolithic, ever since the first appearance of ancient hominins in the region about 2 Ma ago.
{"title":"Between the Caucasus and the Caspian Sea: Human occupation of the coastal zone of the Western Caspian in the Pleistocene","authors":"A.A. Anoikin , A.G. Rybalko , A.V. Kandyba , N.A. Vikulova , E.P. Kulakova , T.A. Yanina , A.Yu. Kazanskiy , R.N. Kurbanov","doi":"10.1016/j.ara.2023.100442","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ara.2023.100442","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>In recent years more than 20 new Palaeolithic sites have been discovered on the Caucasian coast of the Caspian Sea<span>, in Dagestan, including several multilayer stratified sites. Broad chronological range archaeological and geological studies have allowed the description of stone industries from the beginning of the </span></span>Lower Palaeolithic<span><span> to the beginning of the Upper Palaeolithic, covering almost the entire </span>Pleistocene<span>. Preliminary geological, palaeomagnetic and biostratigraphic data suggest the age of the oldest stage of hominin occupation of the region is recorded in the lower layer of the Rubas-1 site which is tentatively correlated with the Late Akchagylian era of the Caspian Sea (MIS 76–64, ∼2.2–1.8 Ma). Lower Palaeolithic layers are identified and described in Darvagchay-1 (∼0.6 Ma), Darvagzhay-zaliv-1 (∼0.6 Ma) and Darvagchay-zaliv-4 (0.4–0.3 Ma). The Middle Palaeolithic is recorded in several cultural layers, all of similar age (∼130–110 ka), at the Rubas-1 and Darvagchay river valley sites. The youngest episode of human Palaeolithic occupation of Dagestan coastal area is identified at the Tinit-1 site, with a lithic assemblage of the Terminal Middle Palaeolithic. Our work add to the few existing studies and suggest that, like other parts of the Caucasus, the region was occupied repeatedly during the Palaeolithic, ever since the first appearance of ancient hominins in the region about 2 Ma ago.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":51847,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Research in Asia","volume":"34 ","pages":"Article 100442"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48646818","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}