<p>Primary care is a core component of most healthcare systems. Patients often present with symptoms that can be investigated and treated by primary care clinicians without requiring further specialist input. Although the way primary care is provided differs across countries, it serves various purposes, including providing continuity of care, coordinating with secondary care services, and offering a patient-centered approach to encourage individuals to take control of their health.</p><p>Despite its global importance, the clinical education system in Japan places limited focus on primary care. Undergraduate education primarily focuses on specialists and secondary care. Although structured training programs have recently been established in general practice and family medicine, physicians often enter primary care roles without undergoing formal retraining. Given that Japan's rapidly aging population will lead to an increase in patients with complex multimorbidities and long-term conditions, physicians in Japan must be equipped with the knowledge to treat them through an effective primary care education system.</p><p>There are several differences between primary care education in the United Kingdom and Japan (Table 1). Primary care in the United Kingdom is mainly delivered through the specialty of General Practice. The United Kingdom places a strong emphasis on GP training as a core part of undergraduate education, with the General Medical Council (GMC), the UK's medical regulatory body, advising that all students should be placed in General Practice.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Medical students in the United Kingdom typically spend longer studying General Practice than students in Japan. Research suggests that across all UK medical schools, students spent a median of 53 full days either in teaching sessions or on placement at GP surgeries.<span><sup>2</sup></span> In contrast, the Japanese medical curriculum remains largely focused on specialist care, with the median duration of community-based clinical training estimated at approximately 12 days to 4 weeks.<span><sup>3</sup></span> Therefore, UK graduates typically gain more experience in primary care than their Japanese counterparts, potentially increasing their understanding of the GP specialty when leaving medical school.</p><p>After graduating, doctors in the United Kingdom undertake 2 years of foundation training, which is equivalent to 2 years of junior residency in Japan. During these 2 years, all doctors should undertake community placement, meaning that many of them experience 4 months of work in General Practice. Upon completion, doctors in the United Kingdom choosing to specialize in GP complete three further years of specialty training. This involves the time spent in the relevant hospital departments and approximately 18–24 months in GP posts.<span><sup>4</sup></span> Following the completion of this program, doctors must pass the Royal College of General Practitioner (RCGP) exams to pr
{"title":"Advancing primary care education: Lessons from the United Kingdom for Japan","authors":"Lauren Glover MD, Takashi Watari MD, MHQS, PhD, Tomoko Miyoshi MD, ME, PhD, Hitomi Kataoka MD, PhD","doi":"10.1002/jgf2.70058","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jgf2.70058","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Primary care is a core component of most healthcare systems. Patients often present with symptoms that can be investigated and treated by primary care clinicians without requiring further specialist input. Although the way primary care is provided differs across countries, it serves various purposes, including providing continuity of care, coordinating with secondary care services, and offering a patient-centered approach to encourage individuals to take control of their health.</p><p>Despite its global importance, the clinical education system in Japan places limited focus on primary care. Undergraduate education primarily focuses on specialists and secondary care. Although structured training programs have recently been established in general practice and family medicine, physicians often enter primary care roles without undergoing formal retraining. Given that Japan's rapidly aging population will lead to an increase in patients with complex multimorbidities and long-term conditions, physicians in Japan must be equipped with the knowledge to treat them through an effective primary care education system.</p><p>There are several differences between primary care education in the United Kingdom and Japan (Table 1). Primary care in the United Kingdom is mainly delivered through the specialty of General Practice. The United Kingdom places a strong emphasis on GP training as a core part of undergraduate education, with the General Medical Council (GMC), the UK's medical regulatory body, advising that all students should be placed in General Practice.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Medical students in the United Kingdom typically spend longer studying General Practice than students in Japan. Research suggests that across all UK medical schools, students spent a median of 53 full days either in teaching sessions or on placement at GP surgeries.<span><sup>2</sup></span> In contrast, the Japanese medical curriculum remains largely focused on specialist care, with the median duration of community-based clinical training estimated at approximately 12 days to 4 weeks.<span><sup>3</sup></span> Therefore, UK graduates typically gain more experience in primary care than their Japanese counterparts, potentially increasing their understanding of the GP specialty when leaving medical school.</p><p>After graduating, doctors in the United Kingdom undertake 2 years of foundation training, which is equivalent to 2 years of junior residency in Japan. During these 2 years, all doctors should undertake community placement, meaning that many of them experience 4 months of work in General Practice. Upon completion, doctors in the United Kingdom choosing to specialize in GP complete three further years of specialty training. This involves the time spent in the relevant hospital departments and approximately 18–24 months in GP posts.<span><sup>4</sup></span> Following the completion of this program, doctors must pass the Royal College of General Practitioner (RCGP) exams to pr","PeriodicalId":51861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General and Family Medicine","volume":"26 6","pages":"504-507"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgf2.70058","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145436460","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>Effective collaboration both within and beyond hospital settings, grounded in an understanding of the social determinants of health (SDH), can improve the quality of care, especially in discharge planning and readmission prevention.<span><sup>1</sup></span> In acute care hospital wards, where medical services are often fragmented, general practitioners are expected to deliver care informed by SDH-related evidence, adopting a holistic and patient-centered approach.</p><p>At the 30th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Society of Hospital General Medicine, we convened a symposium to explore the necessity of evidence-based interventions targeting SDH to reduce readmissions and support effective discharge planning in hospital settings.</p><p>First, we presented recent evidence on the prevention of readmissions through interventions addressing the social determinants affecting patients with chronic heart failure—an ambulatory care-sensitive condition of great relevance. While the evidence on the effectiveness of social interventions for reducing readmissions remains inconsistent, current data suggest that individualized, context-sensitive support may provide benefit. For instance, younger male patients have been identified as being at higher risk of readmission, and targeted lifestyle modifications, including dietary changes and medication adherence, have demonstrated efficacy.<span><sup>2</sup></span> Additionally, a retrospective observational study of heart failure patients in Japan shows that structured once-weekly monitoring for patients with dementia is independently associated with readmission, demonstrating the importance of social support.<span><sup>3</sup></span></p><p>Second, we introduced a case study from a large acute care hospital that has implemented a continuum of care framework focused on the “Patient Journey.” This initiative seeks to identify patients' SDH and deliver context-sensitive support aligned with their personal values. We demonstrated that screening for SDH during hospitalization, alongside integrated admission and discharge planning, can improve post-discharge outcomes for both older adults and pediatric patients.<span><sup>4</sup></span> Among older patients, a narrative review and thematic analysis highlight the complexity of frail syndrome and the need for contextualized interventions.<span><sup>5</sup></span> By embedding SDH screening into the clinical pathways for geriatric syndromes, socioeconomic status, educational attainment, social support, and housing conditions were systematically addressed by the interdisciplinary admission and discharge support team. This approach has the potential to improve healthcare quality, including reduced hospital length of stay and lower readmission rates.</p><p>Finally, we discussed an original case that one of the authors experienced involving a heart failure patient who experienced fragmented care delivery, and we examined strategies for the patient journey. The case is an 80-yea
在了解健康的社会决定因素(SDH)的基础上,医院内外的有效合作可以提高护理质量,特别是在出院计划和再入院预防方面在急症病房,医疗服务往往是碎片化的,全科医生应该根据与sdh相关的证据提供护理,采用整体和以患者为中心的方法。在日本医院综合医学学会第30届年会上,我们召开了一次研讨会,探讨针对SDH的循证干预措施的必要性,以减少再入院率,并支持医院环境中有效的出院计划。首先,我们提出了最近关于通过解决影响慢性心力衰竭患者的社会决定因素的干预措施来预防再入院的证据——慢性心力衰竭是一种非常相关的门诊护理敏感疾病。虽然关于社会干预对减少再入院的有效性的证据仍然不一致,但目前的数据表明,个性化的、对环境敏感的支持可能会带来好处。例如,年轻的男性患者被认为有更高的再入院风险,有针对性的生活方式改变,包括饮食改变和药物依从性,已经证明是有效的此外,日本一项针对心力衰竭患者的回顾性观察研究显示,对痴呆症患者进行每周一次的结构化监测与再入院独立相关,这表明了社会支持的重要性。其次,我们介绍了一家大型急症护理医院的案例研究,该医院实施了以“患者旅程”为重点的连续护理框架。这一举措旨在确定患者的SDH,并提供符合其个人价值观的上下文敏感支持。我们证明,在住院期间进行SDH筛查,以及综合入院和出院计划,可以改善老年人和儿科患者的出院后结果在老年患者中,叙述性回顾和专题分析强调了虚弱综合征的复杂性和对情境化干预的需要通过将SDH筛查纳入老年综合征的临床途径,跨学科入院和出院支持团队系统地解决了社会经济地位、教育程度、社会支持和住房条件等问题。这种方法有可能提高医疗保健质量,包括缩短住院时间和降低再入院率。最后,我们讨论了一个原始案例,其中一位作者经历了一个心力衰竭患者,他经历了支离破碎的护理服务,我们研究了患者旅程的策略。该病例是一名独居日本山区的80岁老年妇女,患有慢性心力衰竭和轻度痴呆。在门诊医生不知情的情况下因心力衰竭住院,出院后因入院医院配合不力心力衰竭再次加重。这个案例在听众中引发了激烈的讨论。住院是解决社会脆弱问题、开展痴呆症评估和促进引入长期护理保险服务的关键机会。必须让所有有助于支持患者日常生活和长期健康的利益攸关方参与进来。总之,强调SDH和促进跨机构边界的协作护理可以大大提高医疗保健质量。由于最佳干预策略因个体患者的情况和条件而异,全科医生和医院初级保健医生必须继续积极发表案例研究和实证研究,以指导未来的实践。小坂信太郎获得了大冢制药厂和Mypecon的讲座酬金,以及Cardinal Health、MEDSI和IGAKU-SHOIN Ltd的手稿写作酬金。他还获得了Triple W Japan和卫生劳动科学研究基金的研究资助。所有其他作者声明他们没有利益冲突。
{"title":"Addressing social determinants of health as effective readmission prevention and discharge support","authors":"Kakeru Iwase MD, MFA, Yuya Yokota MD, PhD, Shintaro Kosaka MD, Kazushige Fujiwara MD, Junki Mizumoto MD, PhD","doi":"10.1002/jgf2.70059","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jgf2.70059","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Effective collaboration both within and beyond hospital settings, grounded in an understanding of the social determinants of health (SDH), can improve the quality of care, especially in discharge planning and readmission prevention.<span><sup>1</sup></span> In acute care hospital wards, where medical services are often fragmented, general practitioners are expected to deliver care informed by SDH-related evidence, adopting a holistic and patient-centered approach.</p><p>At the 30th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Society of Hospital General Medicine, we convened a symposium to explore the necessity of evidence-based interventions targeting SDH to reduce readmissions and support effective discharge planning in hospital settings.</p><p>First, we presented recent evidence on the prevention of readmissions through interventions addressing the social determinants affecting patients with chronic heart failure—an ambulatory care-sensitive condition of great relevance. While the evidence on the effectiveness of social interventions for reducing readmissions remains inconsistent, current data suggest that individualized, context-sensitive support may provide benefit. For instance, younger male patients have been identified as being at higher risk of readmission, and targeted lifestyle modifications, including dietary changes and medication adherence, have demonstrated efficacy.<span><sup>2</sup></span> Additionally, a retrospective observational study of heart failure patients in Japan shows that structured once-weekly monitoring for patients with dementia is independently associated with readmission, demonstrating the importance of social support.<span><sup>3</sup></span></p><p>Second, we introduced a case study from a large acute care hospital that has implemented a continuum of care framework focused on the “Patient Journey.” This initiative seeks to identify patients' SDH and deliver context-sensitive support aligned with their personal values. We demonstrated that screening for SDH during hospitalization, alongside integrated admission and discharge planning, can improve post-discharge outcomes for both older adults and pediatric patients.<span><sup>4</sup></span> Among older patients, a narrative review and thematic analysis highlight the complexity of frail syndrome and the need for contextualized interventions.<span><sup>5</sup></span> By embedding SDH screening into the clinical pathways for geriatric syndromes, socioeconomic status, educational attainment, social support, and housing conditions were systematically addressed by the interdisciplinary admission and discharge support team. This approach has the potential to improve healthcare quality, including reduced hospital length of stay and lower readmission rates.</p><p>Finally, we discussed an original case that one of the authors experienced involving a heart failure patient who experienced fragmented care delivery, and we examined strategies for the patient journey. The case is an 80-yea","PeriodicalId":51861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General and Family Medicine","volume":"26 5","pages":"497-498"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgf2.70059","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144929967","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>The article “Relationship between body mass index-to-thigh circumference ratio and incident hypertension among community-dwelling persons”<span><sup>1</sup></span> offers a novel approach to anthropometric risk prediction. The authors should be commended for introducing an innovative metric that incorporates both overall body mass and peripheral muscle/fat distribution, since it has been a neglected aspect in the study of hypertension. These features make the findings potentially applicable with an approach to a big sample that could be used by a wide and varied population in context of community-based study with a longitudinal subsequent follow-up that was integrated into a part of the investigation. However, some methodological factors are likely to curtail the interpretability and generalizability of findings.</p><p>First, the study has not compared the performance level of BMI-to-thigh circumference ratio to other anthropometric measurements that have previously been used to indicate good discrimination of the risk of hypertension, namely waist-to-height ratio, body roundness index, and a body shape index.<span><sup>2</sup></span> Devoid of such direct comparisons, we cannot determine whether such a novel metric can indeed provide a benefit as compared to traditional established measures already used in clinical practice. This lack of comparison limits the possibility of proposing the use of the BMI-to-thigh circumference ratio as a better screening test.</p><p>Second, other variables of body fat distribution other than thigh circumference and BMI have not been adjusted; hence, the fact that central adiposity has an established relationship with hypertension was not considered. A previous research demonstrated that waist-to-height ratio, as a central fat-related indicator, used to be correlated with blood pressure more regularly than with BMI in isolation.<span><sup>3</sup></span> By leaving out these variables in the multivariate analysis, this study might have overestimated the apparent independent role of the thigh circumference to hypertension risk; some of the relationship may in fact be because of central fat deposits.</p><p>Third, dietary sodium and potassium intake was not obtained in the study, given that these dietary variables are well supported to affect both blood pressures and obesity outcomes. A high sodium and low potassium diet is an important factor linked to hypertension as well as abdominal obesity.<span><sup>4</sup></span> This implies the risk of confounding. Elevated salt consumption can be independently related to hypertension and correlated with some patterns of body composition, sharpening or hiding the degree of association between the BMI-to-thigh circumference ratio and hypertension occurrence.</p><p>Nevertheless, the research provides an interesting anthropometric measure that might further expand the possibilities of cardiovascular risk assessment strategies, inability to compare the results directly with oth
{"title":"Relationship between body mass index-to-thigh circumference ratio and incident hypertension among community-dwelling persons","authors":"Sundas Adnan Butt","doi":"10.1002/jgf2.70057","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jgf2.70057","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The article “Relationship between body mass index-to-thigh circumference ratio and incident hypertension among community-dwelling persons”<span><sup>1</sup></span> offers a novel approach to anthropometric risk prediction. The authors should be commended for introducing an innovative metric that incorporates both overall body mass and peripheral muscle/fat distribution, since it has been a neglected aspect in the study of hypertension. These features make the findings potentially applicable with an approach to a big sample that could be used by a wide and varied population in context of community-based study with a longitudinal subsequent follow-up that was integrated into a part of the investigation. However, some methodological factors are likely to curtail the interpretability and generalizability of findings.</p><p>First, the study has not compared the performance level of BMI-to-thigh circumference ratio to other anthropometric measurements that have previously been used to indicate good discrimination of the risk of hypertension, namely waist-to-height ratio, body roundness index, and a body shape index.<span><sup>2</sup></span> Devoid of such direct comparisons, we cannot determine whether such a novel metric can indeed provide a benefit as compared to traditional established measures already used in clinical practice. This lack of comparison limits the possibility of proposing the use of the BMI-to-thigh circumference ratio as a better screening test.</p><p>Second, other variables of body fat distribution other than thigh circumference and BMI have not been adjusted; hence, the fact that central adiposity has an established relationship with hypertension was not considered. A previous research demonstrated that waist-to-height ratio, as a central fat-related indicator, used to be correlated with blood pressure more regularly than with BMI in isolation.<span><sup>3</sup></span> By leaving out these variables in the multivariate analysis, this study might have overestimated the apparent independent role of the thigh circumference to hypertension risk; some of the relationship may in fact be because of central fat deposits.</p><p>Third, dietary sodium and potassium intake was not obtained in the study, given that these dietary variables are well supported to affect both blood pressures and obesity outcomes. A high sodium and low potassium diet is an important factor linked to hypertension as well as abdominal obesity.<span><sup>4</sup></span> This implies the risk of confounding. Elevated salt consumption can be independently related to hypertension and correlated with some patterns of body composition, sharpening or hiding the degree of association between the BMI-to-thigh circumference ratio and hypertension occurrence.</p><p>Nevertheless, the research provides an interesting anthropometric measure that might further expand the possibilities of cardiovascular risk assessment strategies, inability to compare the results directly with oth","PeriodicalId":51861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General and Family Medicine","volume":"26 6","pages":"670-671"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgf2.70057","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145436525","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
A man in his 60s was ultimately diagnosed with a secondary lung abscess caused by an esophagorespiratory fistula. On admission, however, he had initially been diagnosed with a primary lung abscess because of aspiration, given his history of alcohol use. Secondary lung abscesses can result from various underlying conditions. Among these, esophagorespiratory fistulas are significant causes and are often associated with esophageal cancers. An intriguing aspect of this case is that secondary lung abscesses originating from esophageal cancer can occur under similar conditions as aspiration-related pulmonary suppuration. Given the difficulty in distinguishing between the two based solely on imaging, physicians should exercise caution when encountering patients with a history of heavy alcohol consumption.
{"title":"Secondary lung abscess caused by an esophagorespiratory fistula in a patient with a past history of heavy alcohol consumption","authors":"Shuhei Nozaki MD, Taku Yabuki MD, Taro Shimizu MD, PhD, MSc, MPH, MBA, FACP","doi":"10.1002/jgf2.70056","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jgf2.70056","url":null,"abstract":"<p>A man in his 60s was ultimately diagnosed with a secondary lung abscess caused by an esophagorespiratory fistula. On admission, however, he had initially been diagnosed with a primary lung abscess because of aspiration, given his history of alcohol use. Secondary lung abscesses can result from various underlying conditions. Among these, esophagorespiratory fistulas are significant causes and are often associated with esophageal cancers. An intriguing aspect of this case is that secondary lung abscesses originating from esophageal cancer can occur under similar conditions as aspiration-related pulmonary suppuration. Given the difficulty in distinguishing between the two based solely on imaging, physicians should exercise caution when encountering patients with a history of heavy alcohol consumption.</p>","PeriodicalId":51861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General and Family Medicine","volume":"26 6","pages":"634-636"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgf2.70056","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145436385","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}