{"title":"MEMBANGUN KESADARAN HUKUM MASYARAKAT MENUJU GREEN CITY","authors":"Pudjo Utomo","doi":"10.51825/nhk.v1i1.4812","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.51825/nhk.v1i1.4812","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":52601,"journal":{"name":"Nurani Hukum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48708673","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"KENDALA DALAM PENGAMANAN KAWASAN HUTAN KONSERVASI SUAKA MARGASATWA LAMANDAUBERDASARKAN UNDANG UNDANG NOMOR 5 TAHUN 1990 TENTANG KONSERVASI SUMBER DAYA ALAM HAYATI DAN EKOSISTEMNYA.","authors":"Yulianti Yulianti","doi":"10.51825/nhk.v1i1.4814","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.51825/nhk.v1i1.4814","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":52601,"journal":{"name":"Nurani Hukum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45389415","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Konsep multikulturalisme lahir sebagai kebutuhan akan rekognisi kemajemukan dalam kebudayaan. Wacana ini sejatinya hadir sebagai jawaban yang menengahi konstestasi kepentingan-kepentingan yang ada dalam masyarakat majemuk. Dalam praktiknya, multikulturalisme menghadapi tantangan yang riil dihadapan moralitas yang hidup dalam masyarakat. Salah satunya adalah artikulasi atas moral yang hadir dalam tafsir yang tunggal. Hal ini mempunyai implikasi bahwa ontologi moral mempunyai aspek yang tetap dan berlaku umum. Tulisan ini mempunyai tujuan membuka relung-relung tabir ontologi moralitas dan bagaimana relasinya dengan konsepsi multukulturalisme serta bagaimana refleksi moralitas dan hukum. Hipotesisnya adalah kebenaran merupakan sebuah diskursus politis sehingga metode kajian disini akan menggunakan kritik ideologi. Dalam kajian ini pembahasan atas moralitas berada dalam kontestasi antara kelompok sosial dalam masyarakat yang dominan. Titik pijak multikulturalisme sebagai penanda yang membuka pemaknaan atas moral pada koordinat yang plural. Oleh karenanya, dipaparkan juga pengoperasian logika pluralisme hukum yang hanya akan efektif jika problema moralitas plural ini juga hadir dalam diskursus hukum. Dengan kata lain, ontologi moralitas yang plural menjamin kesetaraan dalam realitas hukum.
{"title":"MULTIKULTURALISME DAN DISKURSUS ATAS MORALITAS DALAM LOGIKA PLURALISME HUKUM","authors":"Ikhsan Alfarisi","doi":"10.51825/nhk.v1i1.4811","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.51825/nhk.v1i1.4811","url":null,"abstract":"Konsep multikulturalisme lahir sebagai kebutuhan akan rekognisi kemajemukan dalam kebudayaan. Wacana ini sejatinya hadir sebagai jawaban yang menengahi konstestasi kepentingan-kepentingan yang ada dalam masyarakat majemuk. Dalam praktiknya, multikulturalisme menghadapi tantangan yang riil dihadapan moralitas yang hidup dalam masyarakat. Salah satunya adalah artikulasi atas moral yang hadir dalam tafsir yang tunggal. Hal ini mempunyai implikasi bahwa ontologi moral mempunyai aspek yang tetap dan berlaku umum. Tulisan ini mempunyai tujuan membuka relung-relung tabir ontologi moralitas dan bagaimana relasinya dengan konsepsi multukulturalisme serta bagaimana refleksi moralitas dan hukum. Hipotesisnya adalah kebenaran merupakan sebuah diskursus politis sehingga metode kajian disini akan menggunakan kritik ideologi. Dalam kajian ini pembahasan atas moralitas berada dalam kontestasi antara kelompok sosial dalam masyarakat yang dominan. Titik pijak multikulturalisme sebagai penanda yang membuka pemaknaan atas moral pada koordinat yang plural. Oleh karenanya, dipaparkan juga pengoperasian logika pluralisme hukum yang hanya akan efektif jika problema moralitas plural ini juga hadir dalam diskursus hukum. Dengan kata lain, ontologi moralitas yang plural menjamin kesetaraan dalam realitas hukum.","PeriodicalId":52601,"journal":{"name":"Nurani Hukum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46937124","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The polemics that has arisen over the role of the KPU as well as the accountability of the Provincial KPUD and Regency / City KPU over the issuance of Law No. 32 of 2004 concerning Regional Government. After that, Law Number 22 Year 2007 concerning Election Organizers was born, changed to Law Number 15 of 2011 concerning Election Organizers and was last amended again to Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections. Article 18 paragraph (4) of the 1945 Constitution that "Governors, Regents, and Mayors respectively as Head of Regional Provinces, Regencies and Cities are democratically chosen. Therefore this study aims to explain the Authority of the Election Commission Against Election in Democratic Elections According to the 1945 Constitution. The research method used is normative juridical as the main method and empirical juridical as a supporting method, with the form of qualitative analysis, the data used in this study comes from primary and secondary data. Based on the results of the analysis and discussion concluded: First, in a legal concept according to Article 22E Paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution, the selection of Regional Heads and Deputy Regional Heads is not included in the General Elections, but in terms of Article 22E Paragraph (1), Elections because they are carried out directly, publicly, freely, secretly, honestly and fairly. In the legal concept, seen from Article 22E Paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution and Article 22E Paragraph (5) of the 1945 Constitution, in fact , the KPU is not authorized to hold elections for Regional Heads and Deputy Regional Heads, but substantially seen from Article 22E Paragraph (1), and practices the election of Regional Heads and Deputy Regional Heads conducted directly, publicly, freely, confidentially, honestly and fairly by itself can be held by the KPU. Secondly, the KPU should not carry out the Election of Heads of Regional Heads and Deputy Regional Heads, but it shall be carried out by the organizers of Local Elections as Special Pilkada in accordance with their respective regions.
{"title":"DILEMATIKA KEWENANGAN KOMISI PEMILIHAN UMUM DALAM MENYELENGGARAKAN PILKADA DAN PEMILU MENURUT UNDANG - UNDANG DASAR 1945","authors":"Dede Kurniawan","doi":"10.51825/nhk.v1i1.4816","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.51825/nhk.v1i1.4816","url":null,"abstract":"The polemics that has arisen over the role of the KPU as well as the accountability of the Provincial KPUD and Regency / City KPU over the issuance of Law No. 32 of 2004 concerning Regional Government. After that, Law Number 22 Year 2007 concerning Election Organizers was born, changed to Law Number 15 of 2011 concerning Election Organizers and was last amended again to Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections. Article 18 paragraph (4) of the 1945 Constitution that \"Governors, Regents, and Mayors respectively as Head of Regional Provinces, Regencies and Cities are democratically chosen. Therefore this study aims to explain the Authority of the Election Commission Against Election in Democratic Elections According to the 1945 Constitution. The research method used is normative juridical as the main method and empirical juridical as a supporting method, with the form of qualitative analysis, the data used in this study comes from primary and secondary data. Based on the results of the analysis and discussion concluded: First, in a legal concept according to Article 22E Paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution, the selection of Regional Heads and Deputy Regional Heads is not included in the General Elections, but in terms of Article 22E Paragraph (1), Elections because they are carried out directly, publicly, freely, secretly, honestly and fairly. In the legal concept, seen from Article 22E Paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution and Article 22E Paragraph (5) of the 1945 Constitution, in fact , the KPU is not authorized to hold elections for Regional Heads and Deputy Regional Heads, but substantially seen from Article 22E Paragraph (1), and practices the election of Regional Heads and Deputy Regional Heads conducted directly, publicly, freely, confidentially, honestly and fairly by itself can be held by the KPU. Secondly, the KPU should not carry out the Election of Heads of Regional Heads and Deputy Regional Heads, but it shall be carried out by the organizers of Local Elections as Special Pilkada in accordance with their respective regions.","PeriodicalId":52601,"journal":{"name":"Nurani Hukum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47099103","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：