Pub Date : 2025-12-22DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101571
Alice Aveline , Lisa Szatkowski , Janet Berrington , Kate Costeloe , Shalini Ojha , Paul Fleming , Cheryl Battersby
Background
Necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. This study aimed to examine whether probiotics reduce the risk of severe NEC and other key neonatal morbidities including late onset sepsis and mortality.
Methods
Retrospective study using the United Kingdom National Neonatal Research Database. Infants <32 weeks gestation in England and Wales (01/01/2016–31/12/2022) were included if alive on day four, without major congenital anomaly. A propensity score matched approach was applied matching for gestational age cohorts, birth year epochs and 17 further items. Comparators were infants who were exposed or not to probiotics within 14 days. Primary outcome was severe NEC (confirmed at laparotomy or postmortem or listed primary cause of death). Parent focus groups and former NICU patients supported this study but did not contribute to design or writing.
Findings
48,048 infants (45.2% (21,695/48,048) female), median gestational age 29.4 weeks (IQR 27.4–30.9) were included; 25.3% (12,161/48,048) were exposed to at least one of five available probiotics. 3.6% (1728/48,048) had severe NEC. Of 16,586 infants (8293 exposed and 8293 unexposed) in the propensity-matched analysis, incidence and odds ratios (OR) (95% CI) for exposed versus unexposed for severe NEC was 3.3% versus 4.2%, OR 0.80 (0.72–0.89); other definitions of NEC yielded similar results. Incidence for late onset sepsis (10.8% versus 11.5%, OR 0.94 (0.90–0.97)) and survival to discharge (96.6% versus 94.2%, OR 1.76 (1.65–1.88)). In infants <28 weeks gestation, severe NEC (8.7% versus 9.8%, OR 0.88 (0.82–0.93) and for ≥28 weeks (1.0% versus 1.7%, OR 0.59 (0.47–0.73).
Interpretation
Probiotics were associated with a reduction in severe NEC including in those <28 weeks gestation. We currently recommend neonatal units not already using probiotics, to consider the introduction of products meeting appropriate recommendations, in the context of their local morbidity rates.
Funding
NIHR Advanced Fellowship (CB reference: NIHR300617), Imperial College PhD studentship (AA), NIHR RfPB grant (NIHR203590, SO), Imperial NIHR Biomedical Research Centre.
{"title":"Evaluating the effect of probiotics on severe necrotising enterocolitis in preterm infants born before 32 weeks gestation in England and Wales: a propensity-matched population study","authors":"Alice Aveline , Lisa Szatkowski , Janet Berrington , Kate Costeloe , Shalini Ojha , Paul Fleming , Cheryl Battersby","doi":"10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101571","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101571","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. This study aimed to examine whether probiotics reduce the risk of severe NEC and other key neonatal morbidities including late onset sepsis and mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Retrospective study using the United Kingdom National Neonatal Research Database. Infants <32 weeks gestation in England and Wales (01/01/2016–31/12/2022) were included if alive on day four, without major congenital anomaly. A propensity score matched approach was applied matching for gestational age cohorts, birth year epochs and 17 further items. Comparators were infants who were exposed or not to probiotics within 14 days. Primary outcome was severe NEC (confirmed at laparotomy or postmortem or listed primary cause of death). Parent focus groups and former NICU patients supported this study but did not contribute to design or writing.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>48,048 infants (45.2% (21,695/48,048) female), median gestational age 29.4 weeks (IQR 27.4–30.9) were included; 25.3% (12,161/48,048) were exposed to at least one of five available probiotics. 3.6% (1728/48,048) had severe NEC. Of 16,586 infants (8293 exposed and 8293 unexposed) in the propensity-matched analysis, incidence and odds ratios (OR) (95% CI) for exposed versus unexposed for severe NEC was 3.3% versus 4.2%, OR 0.80 (0.72–0.89); <em>other definitions of NEC yielded similar results.</em> Incidence for late onset sepsis (10.8% versus 11.5%, OR 0.94 (0.90–0.97)) and survival to discharge (96.6% versus 94.2%, OR 1.76 (1.65–1.88)). In infants <28 weeks gestation, severe NEC (8.7% versus 9.8%, OR 0.88 (0.82–0.93) and for ≥28 weeks (1.0% versus 1.7%, OR 0.59 (0.47–0.73).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Probiotics were associated with a reduction in severe NEC including in those <28 weeks gestation. We currently recommend neonatal units not already using probiotics, to consider the introduction of products meeting appropriate recommendations, in the context of their local morbidity rates.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div><span>NIHR Advanced Fellowship</span> (CB reference: NIHR300617), <span>Imperial College PhD studentship</span> (AA), <span>NIHR RfPB</span> grant (NIHR203590, SO), <span>Imperial NIHR Biomedical Research Centre</span>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53223,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Europe","volume":"62 ","pages":"Article 101571"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145841221","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) rupture is common knee injury. Although ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is standard, graft failure rates remain high in young active patients. This study investigated whether combining ACLR with anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction (ALLR) reduces grafts failure compared with ACLR.
Methods
In this prospective, single-centre, randomised controlled trial conducted at the Santy Orthopedic Center in Lyon, France, patients aged 18–35 years with symptomatic ACL rupture were randomly allocated (1:1) to ACL + ALL reconstruction using hamstring tendon autograft (ACLR + ALLR) or ACLR with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft (ACLR). Randomisation was performed with a block size of four using telematic software by an independent study coordinator, with concealed allocation. Surgeons were informed of the assigned procedure on the morning of surgery. Outcome assessors were not blinded. The primary outcome was graft failure at 5 years, assessed clinically and by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by an independent sports medicine physicians not involved in the index surgery. Efficacy analyses were performed on the Full Analysis Set in accordance with the intention-to-treat principle, while safety analyses were conducted on the Safety Set. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID NCT03740022. The trial has been completed.
Findings
Between November 11, 2016, and January 20, 2020, 593 patients were randomized (297 assigned to ACLR + ALLR and 296 to ACLR). The mean age was 25.0 years (SD 4.5); 447 (75%) participants were male and 146 (25%) female. Of these 593 patients, 556 (94%) completed a mean 5-year follow-up. Graft failure occurred in 12/283 (4.2%) with ACLR + ALLR versus 28/273 (10.3%) with ACLR (p = 0.006; adjusted odds ratio 2.54 [95% CI 1.27; 5.36]—p = 0.008). The number needed to treat was 17 overall, and 9 in patients younger than 25 years.
Interpretation
In our study of young, active adults with ACL rupture, who are considered high-risk for graft failure, combining ACL reconstruction with anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ACLR + ALLR) significantly decreased graft failure compared with ACLR. These results suggest that ACLR + ALLR might be beneficial for young or highly active individuals and provide a basis for future research to refine patient selection, evaluate long-term outcomes beyond five years, and explore benefits in other subgroups of patients with ACL injuries.
Funding
GCS Ramsay Santé pour l'Enseignement et la Recherche funds the scientific activity at the Santy center.
前交叉韧带(ACL)断裂是常见的膝关节损伤。虽然前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)是标准的,但在年轻的活跃患者中移植物失败率仍然很高。本研究探讨与ACLR相比,ACLR联合前外侧韧带(ALL)重建(ALLR)是否能减少移植物衰竭。方法在法国里昂的Santy骨科中心进行的这项前瞻性、单中心、随机对照试验中,年龄在18-35岁的有症状的ACL断裂患者被随机分配(1:1)到ACL + ALL重建使用腘绳肌腱自体移植物(ACLR + ALLR)或ACLR结合骨-髌骨肌腱-骨自体移植物(ACLR)。随机分组由独立研究协调员使用远程信息处理软件进行,分组大小为4个,并进行隐蔽分配。外科医生在手术当天早上被告知指定的手术程序。结果评估者没有采用盲法。主要结果是5年时移植物失败,由独立的运动医学医生通过临床和磁共振成像(MRI)评估,该医生没有参与指数手术。根据意向治疗原则对全分析集进行疗效分析,对安全集进行安全性分析。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov,编号NCT03740022。审判已经结束。在2016年11月11日至2020年1月20日期间,593例患者被随机分配(297例分配到ACLR + ALLR, 296例分配到ACLR)。平均年龄25.0岁(SD 4.5);447名(75%)参与者为男性,146名(25%)参与者为女性。在这593例患者中,556例(94%)完成了平均5年的随访。ACLR + ALLR组的移植失败发生率为12/283(4.2%),而ACLR组的移植失败发生率为28/273 (10.3%)(p = 0.006;校正优势比2.54 [95% CI 1.27; 5.36] -p = 0.008)。需要治疗的总人数为17人,25岁以下的患者为9人。在我们的研究中,年轻、活跃的成年ACL破裂患者被认为是移植物失败的高危人群,与ACLR相比,ACL重建联合前外侧韧带重建(ACLR + ALLR)可显著减少移植物失败。这些结果表明,ACLR + ALLR可能对年轻或高度活跃的个体有益,并为未来的研究提供基础,以完善患者选择,评估5年以上的长期结果,并探索其他亚组ACL损伤患者的益处。gcs Ramsay sant pour l’enseignement et la Recherche为圣中心的科学活动提供资金。
{"title":"Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction combined with anterolateral ligament reconstruction using hamstring autograft versus anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft: a randomised controlled trial with 5-year follow-up","authors":"Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet , Alessandro Carrozzo , Hervé Poilvache , Jean-Marie Fayard , Benjamin Freychet , Mathieu Thaunat , Thais Dutra Vieira , Adnan Saithna","doi":"10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101561","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101561","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) rupture is common knee injury. Although ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is standard, graft failure rates remain high in young active patients. This study investigated whether combining ACLR with anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction (ALLR) reduces grafts failure compared with ACLR.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this prospective, single-centre, randomised controlled trial conducted at the Santy Orthopedic Center in Lyon, France, patients aged 18–35 years with symptomatic ACL rupture were randomly allocated (1:1) to ACL + ALL reconstruction using hamstring tendon autograft (ACLR + ALLR) or ACLR with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft (ACLR). Randomisation was performed with a block size of four using telematic software by an independent study coordinator, with concealed allocation. Surgeons were informed of the assigned procedure on the morning of surgery. Outcome assessors were not blinded. The primary outcome was graft failure at 5 years, assessed clinically and by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by an independent sports medicine physicians not involved in the index surgery. Efficacy analyses were performed on the Full Analysis Set in accordance with the intention-to-treat principle, while safety analyses were conducted on the Safety Set. Trial registration: <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>, ID <span><span>NCT03740022</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>. The trial has been completed.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Between November 11, 2016, and January 20, 2020, 593 patients were randomized (297 assigned to ACLR + ALLR and 296 to ACLR). The mean age was 25.0 years (SD 4.5); 447 (75%) participants were male and 146 (25%) female. Of these 593 patients, 556 (94%) completed a mean 5-year follow-up. Graft failure occurred in 12/283 (4.2%) with ACLR + ALLR versus 28/273 (10.3%) with ACLR (p = 0.006; adjusted odds ratio 2.54 [95% CI 1.27; 5.36]—p = 0.008). The number needed to treat was 17 overall, and 9 in patients younger than 25 years.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>In our study of young, active adults with ACL rupture, who are considered high-risk for graft failure, combining ACL reconstruction with anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ACLR + ALLR) significantly decreased graft failure compared with ACLR. These results suggest that ACLR + ALLR might be beneficial for young or highly active individuals and provide a basis for future research to refine patient selection, evaluate long-term outcomes beyond five years, and explore benefits in other subgroups of patients with ACL injuries.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div><span>GCS Ramsay Santé pour l'Enseignement et la Recherche</span> funds the scientific activity at the Santy center.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53223,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Europe","volume":"62 ","pages":"Article 101561"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145841222","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-19DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101568
Søren K. Martiny , Morten Schmidt , Jonas A. Povlsen , Kirstine K. Søgaard , Hans E. Bøtker , Henrik T. Sørensen
Background
Socioeconomic position (SEP) influences several determinants of infective endocarditis (IE) progression. Whether IE mortality differs by SEP remains unclear. We examined 5-year mortality after IE by individual-level SEP.
Methods
Using nationwide Danish registries, we identified patients with first-time IE (2010–2022). SEP was assessed by educational and affluence level, categorised as low, medium, and high. The Kaplan–Meier estimator provided 30-day, 1-, 3-, and 5-year mortality risks, risk differences, and risk ratios. Time-varying hazard ratios were derived from flexible parametric models. We estimated attendance at outpatient and dental follow-up visits (indicating adherence to follow-up) using the Aalen-Johansen estimator and modelled hospitalisation rate during follow-up (indicating comorbid disease burden) using a joint frailty model, treating death as a competing event in all models.
Findings
The 5-year mortality by educational level was 63.1% (95% CI: 60.8%–65.2%) for low, 53.1% (95% CI: 51.3%–54.9%) for medium, and 45.8% (95% CI: 42.5%–48.8%) for high education. The excess mortality was particularly pronounced within the first 2 years. Within one year after discharge, 65.2% (95% CI: 62.9%–67.4%) of low, 73.6% (95% CI: 72.0%–75.2%) of medium, and 74.5% (95% CI: 71.8%–77.2%) of high-education patients had an outpatient contact. The corresponding five year dental visit proportions were 44.0% (95% CI: 41.6%–46.5%), 64.0% (95% CI: 62.2%–65.9%), and 74.0% (95% CI: 71.2%–76.9%), respectively. The hazard ratio for hospitalisations was 1.35 (95% CI: 1.25–1.49) when comparing low vs. high education and 1.19 (95% CI: 1.10–1.27) for low vs. medium. Estimates and time-dependent patterns were similar for affluence level.
Interpretation
Patients with low SEP had higher IE mortality, particularly within the first 2 years. Reduced adherence to follow-up care and comorbid diseases may contribute to this. Determining how the excess mortality is directly linked to the IE episode warrants further investigation.
Funding
Independent Research Fund Denmark (grant no. 3101-00102B) and Center for Population Medicine, Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University.
{"title":"Socioeconomic disparities in long-term mortality after infective endocarditis in Denmark: a nationwide cohort study","authors":"Søren K. Martiny , Morten Schmidt , Jonas A. Povlsen , Kirstine K. Søgaard , Hans E. Bøtker , Henrik T. Sørensen","doi":"10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101568","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101568","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Socioeconomic position (SEP) influences several determinants of infective endocarditis (IE) progression. Whether IE mortality differs by SEP remains unclear. We examined 5-year mortality after IE by individual-level SEP.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using nationwide Danish registries, we identified patients with first-time IE (2010–2022). SEP was assessed by educational and affluence level, categorised as low, medium, and high. The Kaplan–Meier estimator provided 30-day, 1-, 3-, and 5-year mortality risks, risk differences, and risk ratios. Time-varying hazard ratios were derived from flexible parametric models. We estimated attendance at outpatient and dental follow-up visits (indicating adherence to follow-up) using the Aalen-Johansen estimator and modelled hospitalisation rate during follow-up (indicating comorbid disease burden) using a joint frailty model, treating death as a competing event in all models.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>The 5-year mortality by educational level was 63.1% (95% CI: 60.8%–65.2%) for low, 53.1% (95% CI: 51.3%–54.9%) for medium, and 45.8% (95% CI: 42.5%–48.8%) for high education. The excess mortality was particularly pronounced within the first 2 years. Within one year after discharge, 65.2% (95% CI: 62.9%–67.4%) of low, 73.6% (95% CI: 72.0%–75.2%) of medium, and 74.5% (95% CI: 71.8%–77.2%) of high-education patients had an outpatient contact. The corresponding five year dental visit proportions were 44.0% (95% CI: 41.6%–46.5%), 64.0% (95% CI: 62.2%–65.9%), and 74.0% (95% CI: 71.2%–76.9%), respectively. The hazard ratio for hospitalisations was 1.35 (95% CI: 1.25–1.49) when comparing low <em>vs.</em> high education and 1.19 (95% CI: 1.10–1.27) for low <em>vs.</em> medium. Estimates and time-dependent patterns were similar for affluence level.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Patients with low SEP had higher IE mortality, particularly within the first 2 years. Reduced adherence to follow-up care and comorbid diseases may contribute to this. Determining how the excess mortality is directly linked to the IE episode warrants further investigation.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div><span>Independent Research Fund</span> Denmark (grant no. 3101-00102B) and Center for Population Medicine, <span>Department of Clinical Epidemiology</span>, <span>Aarhus University</span>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53223,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Europe","volume":"62 ","pages":"Article 101568"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145798557","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-18eCollection Date: 2026-02-01DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101550
Ruth Kipping, Sharon Anne Simpson, Kim Hannam, Peter S Blair, Russell Jago, Corby K Martin, Zoi Toumpakari, Laura Johnson, James Garbutt, Rachel Maishman, James White, Rebecca Langford, William Hollingworth, Madeleine Cochrane, Laurence Moore, Chris Metcalfe, Anne Martin, Stephanie Chambers, Thomas Reid, Megan Pardoe, Alexandra Dobell, Marie Murphy, Susan Stratton, Jemima Cooper, Jodi Taylor, Miranda Pallan
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early childhood education and care (ECEC) provision is widespread. NAPSACC UK is an intervention in ECECs designed to improve nutrition and physical activity policies, practice and provision through ECEC staff workshops, self-assessment and assistance over one year. It was adapted for the UK from the USA and we tested whether it reduced energy consumption and increased physical activity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Repeated cross-sectional, multicentre, two-arm, single-blind, parallel-group, cluster-randomised controlled trial including ECEC providers in the UK. The randomisation was conducted by a statistician who was blinded to ECEC provider identity, with allocation within each local authority area and by ECEC Index of Multiple Deprivation scores to minimise differences between arms. Participants were not blind to allocation. Co-primary outcomes after 12-months were child average total energy consumed per eating occasion in the ECEC (lunch or snack) and child accelerometer-assessed total physical activity on ECEC days. Secondary outcomes were moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, sedentary time, energy served and consumed at lunch and snacks, diet quality, and Body Mass Index z-score. The senior statistician and majority of co-investigators were blinded. Analysis was intention-to-treat. Trial registration is ISRCTN33134697 and is completed.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between 14 March 2022 and 25 March 2024 we enrolled 52 ECEC providers (25 intervention; 27 control) and 835 2-5 year-olds (401 intervention, 434 control). The co-primary outcomes were assessed 12 months after baseline with data provided by 382 children for nutrition and 244 children for physical activity. There was no evidence of a difference in the co-primary outcomes compared to control of average kcal per eating occasion in ECEC (adjusted geometric mean ratio 0.86 (95% CI 0.72-1.03; p = 0.09)) or total physical activity (adjusted mean difference (aMD) -2.13 min (95% CI -10.96 to 6.70; p = 0.64)). There was evidence of lower lunch energy served (aMD -69.1 kcal per occasion (95% CI -116 to -22.2; p = 0.004)) and consumed (aMD -67.7 kcal per occasion (95% CI -118.6 to -18.7, p = 0.009)) with the intervention. There was no evidence of differences in other secondary outcomes. No adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>NAPSACC UK did not improve average kcal per eating occasion in ECEC or physical activity. Lower lunch energy servings and consumption closer to recommendations were observed as secondary outcomes. The lower fidelity to the intervention than intended and staffing pressures give insight into interpretation of the null result. Therefore, we recommend that policy-level and statutory changes, which require low agency by individual ECEC settings are research and policy priorities for nutrition and physical activity in ECEC.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>National Institute for Health and Care Research
背景:幼儿教育和护理(ECEC)的提供是广泛的。NAPSACC UK是ECEC的一项干预措施,旨在通过ECEC员工研讨会、自我评估和援助,在一年多的时间里改善营养和体育活动政策、实践和提供。我们测试了它是否减少了能量消耗和增加了体力活动。方法:重复横断面、多中心、双臂、单盲、平行组、集群随机对照试验,包括英国的ECEC提供者。随机化是由一名统计学家进行的,他对ECEC提供者身份不知情,在每个地方当局区域内进行分配,并通过ECEC多重剥夺指数得分来尽量减少两组之间的差异。参与者并非对分配视而不见。12个月后的共同主要结果是儿童在ECEC中每次进食(午餐或零食)的平均总能量消耗和儿童在ECEC日加速计评估的总身体活动。次要结果为中高强度体力活动、久坐时间、午餐和零食时提供和消耗的能量、饮食质量和身体质量指数z-得分。高级统计学家和大多数共同调查者采用盲法。分析是意向治疗。试验注册号为ISRCTN33134697,已完成。研究结果:在2022年3月14日至2024年3月25日期间,我们招募了52名ECEC提供者(25名干预,27名对照)和835名2-5岁儿童(401名干预,434名对照)。根据382名儿童提供的营养数据和244名儿童提供的身体活动数据,在基线后12个月评估了共同主要结果。与ECEC中每次进食的平均千卡(校正几何平均比0.86 (95% CI 0.72-1.03; p = 0.09)或总体力活动(校正平均差(aMD) -2.13分钟(95% CI -10.96 - 6.70; p = 0.64))相比,没有证据表明共同主要结局有差异。有证据表明,干预组的午餐能量较低(aMD -69.1千卡/次(95% CI -116至-22.2;p = 0.004)),消耗(aMD -67.7千卡/次(95% CI -118.6至-18.7,p = 0.009))。在其他次要结果方面没有证据表明存在差异。无不良事件报告。解释:NAPSACC UK并没有改善ECEC或身体活动的每次进食的平均卡路里。较低的午餐能量量和更接近建议的摄入量被视为次要结果。较低的保真度干预比预期和人员配备的压力提供了对无效结果的解释的见解。因此,我们建议政策层面和法律的改变,这需要个体ECEC设置的低机构,是ECEC营养和身体活动的研究和政策重点。资助:国家卫生和保健研究所(NIHR):127551。
{"title":"Effectiveness of an environmental nutrition and physical activity intervention in early childhood education and care settings (NAPSACC UK): a multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Ruth Kipping, Sharon Anne Simpson, Kim Hannam, Peter S Blair, Russell Jago, Corby K Martin, Zoi Toumpakari, Laura Johnson, James Garbutt, Rachel Maishman, James White, Rebecca Langford, William Hollingworth, Madeleine Cochrane, Laurence Moore, Chris Metcalfe, Anne Martin, Stephanie Chambers, Thomas Reid, Megan Pardoe, Alexandra Dobell, Marie Murphy, Susan Stratton, Jemima Cooper, Jodi Taylor, Miranda Pallan","doi":"10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101550","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101550","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early childhood education and care (ECEC) provision is widespread. NAPSACC UK is an intervention in ECECs designed to improve nutrition and physical activity policies, practice and provision through ECEC staff workshops, self-assessment and assistance over one year. It was adapted for the UK from the USA and we tested whether it reduced energy consumption and increased physical activity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Repeated cross-sectional, multicentre, two-arm, single-blind, parallel-group, cluster-randomised controlled trial including ECEC providers in the UK. The randomisation was conducted by a statistician who was blinded to ECEC provider identity, with allocation within each local authority area and by ECEC Index of Multiple Deprivation scores to minimise differences between arms. Participants were not blind to allocation. Co-primary outcomes after 12-months were child average total energy consumed per eating occasion in the ECEC (lunch or snack) and child accelerometer-assessed total physical activity on ECEC days. Secondary outcomes were moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, sedentary time, energy served and consumed at lunch and snacks, diet quality, and Body Mass Index z-score. The senior statistician and majority of co-investigators were blinded. Analysis was intention-to-treat. Trial registration is ISRCTN33134697 and is completed.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between 14 March 2022 and 25 March 2024 we enrolled 52 ECEC providers (25 intervention; 27 control) and 835 2-5 year-olds (401 intervention, 434 control). The co-primary outcomes were assessed 12 months after baseline with data provided by 382 children for nutrition and 244 children for physical activity. There was no evidence of a difference in the co-primary outcomes compared to control of average kcal per eating occasion in ECEC (adjusted geometric mean ratio 0.86 (95% CI 0.72-1.03; p = 0.09)) or total physical activity (adjusted mean difference (aMD) -2.13 min (95% CI -10.96 to 6.70; p = 0.64)). There was evidence of lower lunch energy served (aMD -69.1 kcal per occasion (95% CI -116 to -22.2; p = 0.004)) and consumed (aMD -67.7 kcal per occasion (95% CI -118.6 to -18.7, p = 0.009)) with the intervention. There was no evidence of differences in other secondary outcomes. No adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>NAPSACC UK did not improve average kcal per eating occasion in ECEC or physical activity. Lower lunch energy servings and consumption closer to recommendations were observed as secondary outcomes. The lower fidelity to the intervention than intended and staffing pressures give insight into interpretation of the null result. Therefore, we recommend that policy-level and statutory changes, which require low agency by individual ECEC settings are research and policy priorities for nutrition and physical activity in ECEC.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>National Institute for Health and Care Research ","PeriodicalId":53223,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Europe","volume":"61 ","pages":"101550"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12882655/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146144557","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-18DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101570
Christian S. Scheer , Evangelos J. Giamarellos-Bourboulis , Djillali Annane , Antonio Artigas , Abdullah Tarik Aslan , Gabriella Bottari , Hjalmar R. Bouma , Vladimir Černý , Renata Curić Radivojević , Ken Dewitte , Daniela Filipescu , Matthias Gründling , Johanna Hästbacka , Said Laribi , Annmarie Lassen , Konstantin Lebedinskii , Adam Linder , Jan Máca , Manu L.N.G. Malbrain , Gianpaola Monti , Zuzanna Górska
Background
Blood cultures (BCs) are key diagnostic elements for sepsis patients. Accurate preanalytical procedures are substantial, and results should be available as soon as possible to guide adequate antimicrobial treatment. This study aimed to evaluate BC collection practices and diagnostic capacity across European hospitals.
Methods
This cross-sectional survey investigated BC diagnostics in acute care hospitals across 37 European countries in the years 2021 and 2022. Analyses included BC guidelines, collection sites, number of BC sets in emergency departments (EDs), wards, and intensive care units (ICUs). We also examined transfer after collection, the use of on-site vs. external laboratories, opening hours, rapid testing capacity, and turn-around times of BCs processed in microbiology laboratories with different infrastructures.
Findings
Responses were collected from 907 hospitals in Europe. BC guidelines were available in 84·4% (741/878) of the hospitals. BCs were preferably collected by multiple-site sampling in EDs (62·7%, 461/735), in wards (64·0%, 513/802) and ICUs (68·5%, 518/756). One BC set was preferred in EDs in 38·4% (270/704), in wards in 40·5% (314/775), and ICUs in 34·9% (261/748). Two BC sets were preferred in EDs in 31·0% (218/704), in wards in 28·1% (218/775), and ICUs in 39·2% (293/748). 48·0% (402/838) of hospitals used on-site and 52·0% (436/838) external microbiology laboratories. Around-the-clock microbiological services were available in 10⋅0% (91/907), and rapid pathogen identification in 43·7% (396/907) of hospitals. Infrastructure with around-the-clock microbiological service and rapid testing was available in 7·4% (62/840) of hospitals, and probability of a final microbiological result within two days was highest in these hospitals compared to hospitals with limited microbiology service (for BC collected on wards: 19·6% vs. 52·7%, Odds Ratio 4·59 [95% CI 2·50–7·79], p < 0·0001).
Interpretation
Despite the availability of BC guidelines in many hospitals, current recommendations for BC collection were often neglected. Rapid testing capacity was limited in most microbiological laboratories, and around-the-clock service for BCs was very rare. As delay in results may have a detrimental impact on patient outcomes, strategies to improve these processes are urgently needed.
Funding
The European Sepsis Alliance and a grant by Becton and Dickinson.
血培养(BCs)是脓毒症患者的关键诊断要素。准确的分析前程序是重要的,结果应尽快提供,以指导适当的抗菌治疗。本研究旨在评估欧洲各医院的BC采集实践和诊断能力。方法本横断面调查调查了欧洲37个国家在2021年和2022年急性护理医院的BC诊断。分析包括BC指南、收集地点、急诊科(ed)、病房和重症监护病房(icu)的BC集数。我们还检查了收集后的转移、现场实验室与外部实验室的使用、开放时间、快速检测能力以及在不同基础设施的微生物实验室处理的bc的周转时间。调查结果收集了来自欧洲907家医院的回复。81.4%(741/878)的医院有BC指南。在急诊科(66.7%,461/735)、病房(61.4%,513/802)和icu(68.5%, 518/756)采用多点采样的方法采集bc较好。1套BC在急诊科为38.4%(270/704),病房为40.5% (314/775),icu为34.9%(261/748)。急诊科选择2套BC的比例为31.0%(218/704),病房为28.1% (218/775),icu为39.2%(293/748)。48.0%(402/838)医院使用现场微生物实验室,52.0%(436/838)医院使用外部微生物实验室。10⋅0%(91/907)的医院提供全天候微生物服务,43·7%(396/907)的医院提供快速病原体鉴定。7.4%(62/840)的医院拥有全天候微生物学服务和快速检测的基础设施,与微生物学服务有限的医院相比,这些医院在两天内获得最终微生物学结果的概率最高(在病房采集的BC: 19.6%对52.7%,优势比4.59 [95% CI 2.50 - 7.79], p < 0.0001)。尽管许多医院都有BC指南,但目前对BC收集的建议经常被忽视。大多数微生物实验室的快速检测能力有限,对bc的全天候服务非常罕见。由于结果的延迟可能对患者的预后产生不利影响,因此迫切需要改进这些过程的战略。为欧洲败血症联盟提供资金,由Becton和Dickinson资助。
{"title":"Blood culture practices and microbiological capacity for sepsis diagnostics in Europe (2021–2022): a cross-sectional analysis of the European Sepsis Care Survey","authors":"Christian S. Scheer , Evangelos J. Giamarellos-Bourboulis , Djillali Annane , Antonio Artigas , Abdullah Tarik Aslan , Gabriella Bottari , Hjalmar R. Bouma , Vladimir Černý , Renata Curić Radivojević , Ken Dewitte , Daniela Filipescu , Matthias Gründling , Johanna Hästbacka , Said Laribi , Annmarie Lassen , Konstantin Lebedinskii , Adam Linder , Jan Máca , Manu L.N.G. Malbrain , Gianpaola Monti , Zuzanna Górska","doi":"10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101570","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101570","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Blood cultures (BCs) are key diagnostic elements for sepsis patients. Accurate preanalytical procedures are substantial, and results should be available as soon as possible to guide adequate antimicrobial treatment. This study aimed to evaluate BC collection practices and diagnostic capacity across European hospitals.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This cross-sectional survey investigated BC diagnostics in acute care hospitals across 37 European countries in the years 2021 and 2022. Analyses included BC guidelines, collection sites, number of BC sets in emergency departments (EDs), wards, and intensive care units (ICUs). We also examined transfer after collection, the use of on-site vs. external laboratories, opening hours, rapid testing capacity, and turn-around times of BCs processed in microbiology laboratories with different infrastructures.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Responses were collected from 907 hospitals in Europe. BC guidelines were available in 84·4% (741/878) of the hospitals. BCs were preferably collected by multiple-site sampling in EDs (62·7%, 461/735), in wards (64·0%, 513/802) and ICUs (68·5%, 518/756). One BC set was preferred in EDs in 38·4% (270/704), in wards in 40·5% (314/775), and ICUs in 34·9% (261/748). Two BC sets were preferred in EDs in 31·0% (218/704), in wards in 28·1% (218/775), and ICUs in 39·2% (293/748). 48·0% (402/838) of hospitals used on-site and 52·0% (436/838) external microbiology laboratories. Around-the-clock microbiological services were available in 10⋅0% (91/907), and rapid pathogen identification in 43·7% (396/907) of hospitals. Infrastructure with around-the-clock microbiological service and rapid testing was available in 7·4% (62/840) of hospitals, and probability of a final microbiological result within two days was highest in these hospitals compared to hospitals with limited microbiology service (for BC collected on wards: 19·6% vs. 52·7%, Odds Ratio 4·59 [95% CI 2·50–7·79], p < 0·0001).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Despite the availability of BC guidelines in many hospitals, current recommendations for BC collection were often neglected. Rapid testing capacity was limited in most microbiological laboratories, and around-the-clock service for BCs was very rare. As delay in results may have a detrimental impact on patient outcomes, strategies to improve these processes are urgently needed.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>The <span>European Sepsis Alliance</span> and a grant by Becton and Dickinson.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53223,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Europe","volume":"62 ","pages":"Article 101570"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145798566","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-17DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101554
Kerstin K. Rauwolf , Teresa de Rojas , Miguel Martins , Maria Otth , Uta Dirksen , Delphine Heenen , Lejla Kameric , Pamela Kearns , Ruth Ladenstein , Cormac Owens , Caroline Queiroz , Richard Sullivan , Carmelo Rizzari , Gilles Vassal , European Society for Paediatric Oncology (SIOPE)
There are pronounced inequalities in outcomes of children, adolescents, and young adults (AYA) with cancer across Europe. The OCEAN project aimed at describing the availability of clinical trials for this population, the inequalities between countries, and propose solutions to reduce these disparities. The ClinicalTrials.gov database was searched to identify all European cancer clinical interventional studies including patients <18 years with a start date between 2010 and 2022. The study included 436 cancer-directed trials in 38 European countries. More than half were academic-sponsored (55%), and 49% included exclusively pediatric/AYA patients. Important differences in available trial numbers per country were identified, with more trials observed in Northern and Western Europe as compared to Eastern Europe. There is an urgent need to address differences in clinical trials availability both at European and national levels to advance equity and improve care, research and access to innovation for all pediatric/AYA patients with cancer in Europe.
Funding
This work has been performed as part of WP6 on inequalities in cancer research of the 4.UNCAN.eu Coordination and Support Action (#101069496) funded by the European Union and has been supported by Zoé4Life (MO).
{"title":"Inequalities in availability of clinical trials for pediatric, adolescent, and young adult patients with cancer in Europe: results from the SIOPE OCEAN project","authors":"Kerstin K. Rauwolf , Teresa de Rojas , Miguel Martins , Maria Otth , Uta Dirksen , Delphine Heenen , Lejla Kameric , Pamela Kearns , Ruth Ladenstein , Cormac Owens , Caroline Queiroz , Richard Sullivan , Carmelo Rizzari , Gilles Vassal , European Society for Paediatric Oncology (SIOPE)","doi":"10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101554","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101554","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There are pronounced inequalities in outcomes of children, adolescents, and young adults (AYA) with cancer across Europe. The OCEAN project aimed at describing the availability of clinical trials for this population, the inequalities between countries, and propose solutions to reduce these disparities. The <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> database was searched to identify all European cancer clinical interventional studies including patients <18 years with a start date between 2010 and 2022. The study included 436 cancer-directed trials in 38 European countries. More than half were academic-sponsored (55%), and 49% included exclusively pediatric/AYA patients. Important differences in available trial numbers per country were identified, with more trials observed in Northern and Western Europe as compared to Eastern Europe. There is an urgent need to address differences in clinical trials availability both at European and national levels to advance equity and improve care, research and access to innovation for all pediatric/AYA patients with cancer in Europe.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>This work has been performed as part of WP6 on inequalities in cancer research of the 4.UNCAN.eu Coordination and Support Action (#101069496) funded by the <span>European Union</span> and has been supported by <span>Zoé4Life</span> (MO).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53223,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Europe","volume":"62 ","pages":"Article 101554"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145798567","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-13DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101557
Huei-Tyng Huang, Michael Hewitt, Wenhao Li, William Alazawi
Real-world evidence (RWE), derived from real-world data, offers key insights into metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). RWE complements traditional randomised controlled trials by capturing large-scale, diverse patient populations and long-term outcomes. This review interrogates the role of RWE in understanding MASLD epidemiology, natural history, hepatic and extra-hepatic endpoints, including its co-morbid association with cardiovascular and chronic kidney disease, and its use in pharmacovigilance and precision medicine. RWE highlights large regional variations and is increasingly leveraged to advance drug development through target discovery and patient stratification. However, challenges such as data quality and confounding factors persist. In this review, key methodological gaps and future research priorities are identified and highlighted. The potential of artificial intelligence with multi-modal data linkage is considerable but requires rigorous methodologies and collaboration to fully realise the potential of RWE in MASLD research.
{"title":"Real-world evidence in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD): insights, challenges, and future directions","authors":"Huei-Tyng Huang, Michael Hewitt, Wenhao Li, William Alazawi","doi":"10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101557","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101557","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Real-world evidence (RWE), derived from real-world data, offers key insights into metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). RWE complements traditional randomised controlled trials by capturing large-scale, diverse patient populations and long-term outcomes. This review interrogates the role of RWE in understanding MASLD epidemiology, natural history, hepatic and extra-hepatic endpoints, including its co-morbid association with cardiovascular and chronic kidney disease, and its use in pharmacovigilance and precision medicine. RWE highlights large regional variations and is increasingly leveraged to advance drug development through target discovery and patient stratification. However, challenges such as data quality and confounding factors persist. In this review, key methodological gaps and future research priorities are identified and highlighted. The potential of artificial intelligence with multi-modal data linkage is considerable but requires rigorous methodologies and collaboration to fully realise the potential of RWE in MASLD research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53223,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Europe","volume":"62 ","pages":"Article 101557"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145798568","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-11DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101562
Juliette Brenner , Anna E.M. Bastiaansen , Mar Guasp , Sergio Muñiz-Castrillo , Takahiro Iizuka , Marienke A.A.M. de Bruijn , Amaia Muñoz-Lopetegi , Eugenia Martínez-Hernández , Géraldine Picard , Alberto Vogrig , Mathilde Millot , Carsten Finke , Christian Geis , Jan Lewerenz , Nico Melzer , Harald Prüss , Saskia Räuber , Marius Ringelstein , Kevin Rostàsy , Kurt-Wolfram Sühs , Maarten J. Titulaer
<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Anti-N-methyl-<span>d</span>-aspartate receptor (anti-NMDAR) encephalitis is a severe disease that primarily affects young people and can improve with adequate treatment. We aimed to refine the anti-NMDAR Encephalitis One-year functional Status (NEOS) score by developing NEOS2, an updated model using readily available data at the time of diagnosis. We assessed the predictive value of the NEOS2-score for (1) improvement following first-line treatment, (2) functional outcome at one-year follow-up, and (3) resumption of school or work within three years.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this international (France, Germany, Japan, the Netherlands and Spain) cohort study in patients with a definite anti-NMDAR encephalitis diagnosis (according to the clinical criteria plus antibody testing in CSF), we performed logistic regression analyses to develop and validate multivariable models to predict -based upon variables available at diagnosis- short (ΔmRS two weeks after first-line treatment), middle (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] at one year), and long-term (return to school or work within three years) outcomes. We included clinical variables and biomarkers available at diagnosis.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>We included 702 patients (mean age 23 years, 95%-CI 2–69; 79% female, 21% male) diagnosed between the discovery of the disease in 2007 and 2022. Most patients (96%; 672/702) had received first-line immunotherapy, and 38% (233/615) showed improvement within two weeks. One year after diagnosis, 80% (517/644) had a favourable functional outcome (mRS≤2). At three years, 73% (203/278) had resumed work/school. In multivariable analysis, higher age (odds ratio [OR] 0·35, 95%-CI 0·29–0·43, p < 0·0001), treatment delay (OR 0·49, 95%-CI 0·41–0·58, p < 0·0001), movement disorders (OR 0·32, 95%-CI 0·24–0·41, p < 0·0001), ICU-requirement (OR 0·34, 95%-CI 0·26–0·44, p < 0·0001) and increased CSF leucocyte count (OR 0·65, 95%-CI 0·60–0·71, p < 0·0001) independently predicted poorer outcomes (NEOS2, accuracy AUC 80%, 95%-CI 75–86%). The same variables, excluding age, were relevant in predicting improvement following first-line immunotherapy (NEOS2-T AUC 81–84%, 95%-CI 77–86%). Return-to-work or -school served as a useful measure of longer-term outcomes, predicted with equal accuracy as one-year functional outcome (NEOS2-W AUC 80%, 95%-CI 75–85%). The NEOS2-score, applied as an ordinal measure, enabled nuanced predictions of outcome probabilities across the score spectrum, ranging from a high (80%; n = 20/25) likelihood of improving after first-line immunotherapy and achieving a good outcome (100%; n = 32/32) to a high risk of first-line treatment failure (97%; n = 77/79) and no return to school/work (94%; n = 15/16).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>The NEOS2-score, readily available at diagnosis and easy to apply, can identify patients with either a favourable or poor prognosis, and those who may
{"title":"Development and validation of the NEOS2 score for prediction of long-term outcomes and improvement after first-line immunotherapy in patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis: an international cohort study","authors":"Juliette Brenner , Anna E.M. Bastiaansen , Mar Guasp , Sergio Muñiz-Castrillo , Takahiro Iizuka , Marienke A.A.M. de Bruijn , Amaia Muñoz-Lopetegi , Eugenia Martínez-Hernández , Géraldine Picard , Alberto Vogrig , Mathilde Millot , Carsten Finke , Christian Geis , Jan Lewerenz , Nico Melzer , Harald Prüss , Saskia Räuber , Marius Ringelstein , Kevin Rostàsy , Kurt-Wolfram Sühs , Maarten J. Titulaer","doi":"10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101562","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101562","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Anti-N-methyl-<span>d</span>-aspartate receptor (anti-NMDAR) encephalitis is a severe disease that primarily affects young people and can improve with adequate treatment. We aimed to refine the anti-NMDAR Encephalitis One-year functional Status (NEOS) score by developing NEOS2, an updated model using readily available data at the time of diagnosis. We assessed the predictive value of the NEOS2-score for (1) improvement following first-line treatment, (2) functional outcome at one-year follow-up, and (3) resumption of school or work within three years.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this international (France, Germany, Japan, the Netherlands and Spain) cohort study in patients with a definite anti-NMDAR encephalitis diagnosis (according to the clinical criteria plus antibody testing in CSF), we performed logistic regression analyses to develop and validate multivariable models to predict -based upon variables available at diagnosis- short (ΔmRS two weeks after first-line treatment), middle (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] at one year), and long-term (return to school or work within three years) outcomes. We included clinical variables and biomarkers available at diagnosis.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>We included 702 patients (mean age 23 years, 95%-CI 2–69; 79% female, 21% male) diagnosed between the discovery of the disease in 2007 and 2022. Most patients (96%; 672/702) had received first-line immunotherapy, and 38% (233/615) showed improvement within two weeks. One year after diagnosis, 80% (517/644) had a favourable functional outcome (mRS≤2). At three years, 73% (203/278) had resumed work/school. In multivariable analysis, higher age (odds ratio [OR] 0·35, 95%-CI 0·29–0·43, p < 0·0001), treatment delay (OR 0·49, 95%-CI 0·41–0·58, p < 0·0001), movement disorders (OR 0·32, 95%-CI 0·24–0·41, p < 0·0001), ICU-requirement (OR 0·34, 95%-CI 0·26–0·44, p < 0·0001) and increased CSF leucocyte count (OR 0·65, 95%-CI 0·60–0·71, p < 0·0001) independently predicted poorer outcomes (NEOS2, accuracy AUC 80%, 95%-CI 75–86%). The same variables, excluding age, were relevant in predicting improvement following first-line immunotherapy (NEOS2-T AUC 81–84%, 95%-CI 77–86%). Return-to-work or -school served as a useful measure of longer-term outcomes, predicted with equal accuracy as one-year functional outcome (NEOS2-W AUC 80%, 95%-CI 75–85%). The NEOS2-score, applied as an ordinal measure, enabled nuanced predictions of outcome probabilities across the score spectrum, ranging from a high (80%; n = 20/25) likelihood of improving after first-line immunotherapy and achieving a good outcome (100%; n = 32/32) to a high risk of first-line treatment failure (97%; n = 77/79) and no return to school/work (94%; n = 15/16).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>The NEOS2-score, readily available at diagnosis and easy to apply, can identify patients with either a favourable or poor prognosis, and those who may ","PeriodicalId":53223,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Europe","volume":"62 ","pages":"Article 101562"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145749855","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-11DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101552
Marcus Grobe-Einsler , Stéphanie Borel , Maresa Buchholz , Sabrina Sayah , Rania Hilab , Lucie Pierron , Audrey Iskandar , Brittany Humphries , Claire Ewenczyk , Anna Heinzmann , Mariana Atencio , Katrin Feldmann , Vivian Maas , Jennifer Faber , Sylvia Boesch , Elisabetta Indelicato , Kathrin Reetz , Jörg B. Schulz , Almut T. Bischoff , Thomas Klopstock , Bernhard Michalowsky
Background
Friedreich ataxia (FA) is the most common autosomal recessive ataxia. Little attention has been paid to FA's impact on patient-reported, psychosocial, and health-economic outcomes. This study aimed to report these outcomes across FA's disability stages 1–5.
Methods
We assessed patients in Germany, France, and Austria as part of the PROFA study, a European multicenter observational study. The protocol included a study center visit followed by a remote mobile assessment capturing ataxia severity (SARA), daily living deficits (FARS-ADL), cognitive and affective impairments (CCAS), health-related quality of life (HRQoL: PROM-Ataxia short-form, EQ-5D-5L), mental well-being (WEMWBS), communication disabilities (COMATAX), and healthcare and informal care utilization. FARS disability stages were used to demonstrate outcomes with effect size measures (Eta-Squared, Cramér's V). Multivariate regression models evaluated associations between z-standardized outcomes and disability stages.
Findings
One hundred one patients (mean [SD]: age 35.0 [11.5]; GAA-repeat size 657 [299]; 50.5% women) were included. Activities of daily living, HRQoL, communication disabilities, and informal care utilization worsened significantly across disability stages with moderate to high effect sizes. Cognitive-affective impairments and mental well-being showed significant associations with small effect sizes. Twenty-three patients (33.3%) received formal care, while 40 (58.0%) received informal care (mean 12.2 h/week). Omaveloxolone was used by 33 patients (32.7%). Annual healthcare costs excluding Omaveloxolone were €13,620 (payer) and €32,679 (societal perspective, including informal care and productivity losses).
Interpretation
The results emphasize the multidimensional patient, societal, and economic burden of FA and the need for comprehensive care addressing physical, mental, and psychosocial health.
Funding
European Joint Programme on Rare Diseases (EJP RD).
背景弗里德赖希共济失调(FA)是最常见的常染色体隐性共济失调。很少有人关注FA对患者报告、心理社会和健康经济结果的影响。本研究旨在报告FA残疾阶段1-5的这些结果。方法:作为欧洲多中心观察性研究PROFA的一部分,我们评估了德国、法国和奥地利的患者。该方案包括一次研究中心访问,随后进行远程移动评估,包括共济失调严重程度(SARA)、日常生活缺陷(FARS-ADL)、认知和情感障碍(CCAS)、健康相关生活质量(HRQoL: promo - ataxia简式,EQ-5D-5L)、精神健康(WEMWBS)、沟通障碍(COMATAX)以及医疗保健和非正式护理的利用。FARS残疾分期采用效应量测量(Eta-Squared, cram s V)来证明结果。多变量回归模型评估z标准化结果与残疾分期之间的关联。结果纳入101例患者(平均[SD]:年龄35.0 [11.5];GAA-repeat大小657[299];50.5%为女性)。日常生活活动、HRQoL、沟通障碍和非正式护理利用在残疾阶段显著恶化,具有中高效应量。认知情感障碍和心理健康在小效应量下显示出显著的关联。23例(33.3%)患者接受正规护理,40例(58.0%)患者接受非正规护理(平均12.2小时/周)。33例(32.7%)患者使用奥马维洛酮。不包括奥马韦洛龙的年度医疗保健费用为13,620欧元(付款人)和32,679欧元(社会角度,包括非正规护理和生产力损失)。研究结果强调了FA的患者、社会和经济负担的多维性,以及对身体、精神和社会心理健康进行综合护理的必要性。资助欧洲罕见病联合规划(EJP RD)。
{"title":"Patient-reported, psychosocial and health economic outcomes in mild to moderate Friedreich's ataxia: baseline results of the PROFA study","authors":"Marcus Grobe-Einsler , Stéphanie Borel , Maresa Buchholz , Sabrina Sayah , Rania Hilab , Lucie Pierron , Audrey Iskandar , Brittany Humphries , Claire Ewenczyk , Anna Heinzmann , Mariana Atencio , Katrin Feldmann , Vivian Maas , Jennifer Faber , Sylvia Boesch , Elisabetta Indelicato , Kathrin Reetz , Jörg B. Schulz , Almut T. Bischoff , Thomas Klopstock , Bernhard Michalowsky","doi":"10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101552","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101552","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Friedreich ataxia (FA) is the most common autosomal recessive ataxia. Little attention has been paid to FA's impact on patient-reported, psychosocial, and health-economic outcomes. This study aimed to report these outcomes across FA's disability stages 1–5.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We assessed patients in Germany, France, and Austria as part of the PROFA study, a European multicenter observational study. The protocol included a study center visit followed by a remote mobile assessment capturing ataxia severity (SARA), daily living deficits (FARS-ADL), cognitive and affective impairments (CCAS), health-related quality of life (HRQoL: PROM-Ataxia short-form, EQ-5D-5L), mental well-being (WEMWBS), communication disabilities (COMATAX), and healthcare and informal care utilization. FARS disability stages were used to demonstrate outcomes with effect size measures (Eta-Squared, Cramér's V). Multivariate regression models evaluated associations between z-standardized outcomes and disability stages.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>One hundred one patients (mean [SD]: age 35.0 [11.5]; GAA-repeat size 657 [299]; 50.5% women) were included. Activities of daily living, HRQoL, communication disabilities, and informal care utilization worsened significantly across disability stages with moderate to high effect sizes. Cognitive-affective impairments and mental well-being showed significant associations with small effect sizes. Twenty-three patients (33.3%) received formal care, while 40 (58.0%) received informal care (mean 12.2 h/week). Omaveloxolone was used by 33 patients (32.7%). Annual healthcare costs excluding Omaveloxolone were €13,620 (payer) and €32,679 (societal perspective, including informal care and productivity losses).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>The results emphasize the multidimensional patient, societal, and economic burden of FA and the need for comprehensive care addressing physical, mental, and psychosocial health.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div><span>European Joint Programme on Rare Diseases</span> (EJP RD).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53223,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Europe","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article 101552"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145747382","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}