{"title":"Les effets de l'absence de prix monétaire sur la coordination politique","authors":"F. Facchini","doi":"10.1515/JEEH-2000-0205","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/JEEH-2000-0205","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53483,"journal":{"name":"Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78827401","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Cette reaction est suscitee par larticle de Laurent Le Maux, recemment publie dans ce Journal. Le Maux affirme que Ludwig von Mises etait le defenseur dun systeme de reserves fractionnaires et un precurseur des economistes contemporains partisans des reserves fractionnaires (tels Dowd, Selgin, White). Nous critiquons la maniere dont Le Maux utilise la litterature ancienne dans ce domaine, et nous montrons quil nest pas suffisamment au fait des travaux de Mises et des problemes qui divisent les defenseurs et les opposants du systeme de reserves fractionnaires. Les ecrits de Ludwig von Mises fournissent la preuve accablante quil etait, et il le disait lui-meme, un economiste qui developpait lapproche de la Currency School dans le domaine des problemes bancaires.This paper takes issue with an article by Laurent Le Maux that recently appeared in this journal. Le Maux claims that Ludwig von Mises was an advocate of fractional-reserve banking and a precursor of presentday economists defending fractional reserves (e.g., Dowd, Selgin, White). We criticise Le Mauxs treatment of previous literature in the field, and show that he is insufficiently acquainted with Mises work and with the problems that divide advocates and opponents of fractional reserves. Ludwig von Mises writings provide overwhelming evidence that he was, and saw himself as, an economist who developed the approach of the Currency School toward problems of banking.
这种反应是由Laurent Le Maux最近发表在该报上的一篇文章引起的。《邪恶》认为路德维希·冯·米塞斯是部分储备体系的倡导者，也是当代部分储备经济学家(如多德、塞尔金、怀特)的先驱。我们批评邪恶在这一领域使用旧文献的方式，并表明它没有充分意识到米塞斯的工作和分裂部分储备制度的支持者和反对者的问题。路德维希·冯·米塞斯(Ludwig von Mises)的著作有力地证明，正如他自己所说，他是一位经济学家，在银行业问题上发展了货币学派的方法。这篇论文发表在Laurent Le Maux的一篇文章中，最近发表在这个杂志上。勒莫声称路德维希·冯·米塞斯是部分储备银行的倡导者，也是今天捍卫部分储备的经济学家的先驱(如多德、塞尔金、怀特)。我们批评maux对该领域以前文献的处理，并指出它在处理问题和划分部分保留的支持者和反对者的问题方面不够充分。路德维希·冯·米兹的著作提供了令人无法接受的证据，证明他是一位经济学家，并认为自己是一位发展了货币学派方法来解决银行问题的经济学家。
{"title":"Free Banking Theory and Theoreticians: A comment on Le Maux","authors":"Hülsmann Jörg Guido","doi":"10.2202/1145-6396.1164","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2202/1145-6396.1164","url":null,"abstract":"Cette reaction est suscitee par larticle de Laurent Le Maux, recemment publie dans ce Journal. Le Maux affirme que Ludwig von Mises etait le defenseur dun systeme de reserves fractionnaires et un precurseur des economistes contemporains partisans des reserves fractionnaires (tels Dowd, Selgin, White). Nous critiquons la maniere dont Le Maux utilise la litterature ancienne dans ce domaine, et nous montrons quil nest pas suffisamment au fait des travaux de Mises et des problemes qui divisent les defenseurs et les opposants du systeme de reserves fractionnaires. Les ecrits de Ludwig von Mises fournissent la preuve accablante quil etait, et il le disait lui-meme, un economiste qui developpait lapproche de la Currency School dans le domaine des problemes bancaires.This paper takes issue with an article by Laurent Le Maux that recently appeared in this journal. Le Maux claims that Ludwig von Mises was an advocate of fractional-reserve banking and a precursor of presentday economists defending fractional reserves (e.g., Dowd, Selgin, White). We criticise Le Mauxs treatment of previous literature in the field, and show that he is insufficiently acquainted with Mises work and with the problems that divide advocates and opponents of fractional reserves. Ludwig von Mises writings provide overwhelming evidence that he was, and saw himself as, an economist who developed the approach of the Currency School toward problems of banking.","PeriodicalId":53483,"journal":{"name":"Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82373656","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ces dernieres annees, il y a eu de nombreuses discussions a propos des couts croissants des risques naturels. Jusqua present, pour la premiere fois dans lhistoire lhumanite a pu se premunir contre les caprices de la nature de maniere significative. Le developpement economique a fourni la meilleure protection contre les cataclysmes naturels. Lintervention du gouvernement dans leconomie a contrarie la croissance economique et retarde la possibilite pour les gens de prendre des mesures efficaces afin dattenuer limpact des sinistres naturels. Dans la mesure ou les forces du marche ont pu operer, toute une serie doptions ont permis de predire, prevenir et dedommager les couts de ces risques.In recent years, there have been a lot of discussions about the increased costs of natural hazards. Yet, the fact is that for the first time in history mankind has been able to insulate themselves from the vagaries of nature to a significant extent. Economic development has provided the best protection against natural cataclysms. Government intervention in the economy has adversely affected economic growth and retarded the ability of the people to take effective measures to mitigate the impact of natural hazards. To the extent the market forces have been allowed the space to operate, a whole range of options has evolved to predict, prevent and offset the costs of these hazards.
{"title":"Dealing with Natural Disaster: Role of the Market","authors":"S. MitraBarun","doi":"10.2202/1145-6396.1137","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2202/1145-6396.1137","url":null,"abstract":"Ces dernieres annees, il y a eu de nombreuses discussions a propos des couts croissants des risques naturels. Jusqua present, pour la premiere fois dans lhistoire lhumanite a pu se premunir contre les caprices de la nature de maniere significative. Le developpement economique a fourni la meilleure protection contre les cataclysmes naturels. Lintervention du gouvernement dans leconomie a contrarie la croissance economique et retarde la possibilite pour les gens de prendre des mesures efficaces afin dattenuer limpact des sinistres naturels. Dans la mesure ou les forces du marche ont pu operer, toute une serie doptions ont permis de predire, prevenir et dedommager les couts de ces risques.In recent years, there have been a lot of discussions about the increased costs of natural hazards. Yet, the fact is that for the first time in history mankind has been able to insulate themselves from the vagaries of nature to a significant extent. Economic development has provided the best protection against natural cataclysms. Government intervention in the economy has adversely affected economic growth and retarded the ability of the people to take effective measures to mitigate the impact of natural hazards. To the extent the market forces have been allowed the space to operate, a whole range of options has evolved to predict, prevent and offset the costs of these hazards.","PeriodicalId":53483,"journal":{"name":"Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75461928","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
La tradition ethique en economie politique a ete regeneree par lEcole de Salamanque, mais nous ne sommes pas habitues a associer le liberalisme aux scholastiques qui avaient elabore une theorie du juste prix de validite universelle. Le marche a perdu sa dimension morale avec le rationalisme et, non dans une moindre mesure, a travers le biais religieux de la theorie de la valeur travail. Quand elle fut redecouverte en tant quorigine veritable de la valeur, lutilite ne recouvrit pas sa portee morale, en raison du traitement mathematique quon lui reserva. Le rationalisme a supprime toute conception devolution sociale en meme temps quil a favorise lintervention. Cependant, dans cette ere de corruption, un retour a lacception de sens commun des prix requiert, selon lauteur, le franchissement dune etape supplementaire, celui de maintenir lancrage ethique du juste prix ou du prix du marche.The ethical tradition in political economy was regenerated by the School of Salamanca, but we are not used to associating liberalism with these Scholastics who built a theory of the just price with universal validity. The market lost its moral dimension with rationalism, not least through the religious bias of the labor theory of value. When rediscovered as the correct source of value, utility did not regain its former moral significance because of mathematical treatment. Rationalism has suppressed any concept of social evolution while promoting intervention, but, in the age of corruption, a return to the common sense of prices, the author argues, requires the further step of upholding the ethical standards of the just price or market price.
政治经济学的伦理传统是由萨拉曼卡的勒科尔复兴的，但我们不习惯将自由主义与学院派联系在一起，学院派阐述了普遍有效的公平价格理论。随着理性主义的出现，市场失去了它的道德维度，尤其是通过对劳动价值理论的宗教偏见。当它被重新发现为价值的真正来源时，由于对它的数学处理，它并没有覆盖它的道德范围。理性主义消除了任何社会变革的概念，同时鼓励干预。然而，在这个腐败的时代，要恢复对价格的常识理解，作者认为还需要进一步的步骤，即维持公平价格或市场价格的道德语言。萨拉曼卡学派复兴了政治经济学中的伦理传统，但我们不习惯把自由主义与那些建立了普遍有效的公平价格理论的学者联系起来。The market lost its继承人through with rationalism层面、道德宗教bias of The labor theory of value)。When rediscovered of value)、公用事业(did not as the正确来源再度因为of its道德培养,放弃治疗。理性主义在促进干预的同时压制了社会进化的任何概念，但是，在腐败时代，回归到价格的常识，作者认为，需要进一步维持公平价格或市场价格的道德标准。
{"title":"The Political Economy of the Just Price: What the School of Salamanca Has To Say in the Age of Corruption","authors":"J. Vergés","doi":"10.1515/JEEH-2000-0202","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/JEEH-2000-0202","url":null,"abstract":"La tradition ethique en economie politique a ete regeneree par lEcole de Salamanque, mais nous ne sommes pas habitues a associer le liberalisme aux scholastiques qui avaient elabore une theorie du juste prix de validite universelle. Le marche a perdu sa dimension morale avec le rationalisme et, non dans une moindre mesure, a travers le biais religieux de la theorie de la valeur travail. Quand elle fut redecouverte en tant quorigine veritable de la valeur, lutilite ne recouvrit pas sa portee morale, en raison du traitement mathematique quon lui reserva. Le rationalisme a supprime toute conception devolution sociale en meme temps quil a favorise lintervention. Cependant, dans cette ere de corruption, un retour a lacception de sens commun des prix requiert, selon lauteur, le franchissement dune etape supplementaire, celui de maintenir lancrage ethique du juste prix ou du prix du marche.The ethical tradition in political economy was regenerated by the School of Salamanca, but we are not used to associating liberalism with these Scholastics who built a theory of the just price with universal validity. The market lost its moral dimension with rationalism, not least through the religious bias of the labor theory of value. When rediscovered as the correct source of value, utility did not regain its former moral significance because of mathematical treatment. Rationalism has suppressed any concept of social evolution while promoting intervention, but, in the age of corruption, a return to the common sense of prices, the author argues, requires the further step of upholding the ethical standards of the just price or market price.","PeriodicalId":53483,"journal":{"name":"Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87566859","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"\"Guerre ou Paix ?\": une analyse critique en économie politique internationale","authors":"P. Pierre","doi":"10.1515/JEEH-2000-0206","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/JEEH-2000-0206","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53483,"journal":{"name":"Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74275037","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
La nature quelque peu inductive de cette demarche transparait clairement lorsque Kenneth Arrow affirme que "les situations ou l’on observe une absence des marches sont la marque de leur inaptitude a proposer les biens et services en question". Developpant le modele standard de l’economie publique normative, le prix Nobel americain recense dans son fameux article de 1963 les specificites de l’assurance maladie inherentes a l’asymetrie de l’information. Il les presente comme autant de defaillances du mecanisme des prix expliquant la mise en œuvre d’arrangements institutionnels publics mais aussi prives palliant les carences du marche.
{"title":"Le monopole de la sécurité sociale face à l'histoire des premières protections sociales","authors":"M. Nicolas","doi":"10.1515/JEEH-2000-0204","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/JEEH-2000-0204","url":null,"abstract":"La nature quelque peu inductive de cette demarche transparait clairement lorsque Kenneth Arrow affirme que \"les situations ou l’on observe une absence des marches sont la marque de leur inaptitude a proposer les biens et services en question\". Developpant le modele standard de l’economie publique normative, le prix Nobel americain recense dans son fameux article de 1963 les specificites de l’assurance maladie inherentes a l’asymetrie de l’information. Il les presente comme autant de defaillances du mecanisme des prix expliquant la mise en œuvre d’arrangements institutionnels publics mais aussi prives palliant les carences du marche.","PeriodicalId":53483,"journal":{"name":"Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83174995","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Le probleme du conflit dans les relations interetatiques a donne lieu a un debat important en Economie Politique Internationale. Lecole neoliberale, sappuyant sur la theorie des gains absolus, a pris position pour la preeminence de la cooperation entre les Etats, alors que les theoriciens neorealistes, se fondant sur le concept de gain relatif, ont predit une tendance au conflit (sans que celui-ci se limite a la guerre). Une analyse critique de ces theories a partir des concepts fondamentaux de lecole autrichienne (incertitude, subjectivisme, vigilance de lentrepreneur) permet de montrer que les theories neoliberales et neorealistes sont trop optimistes quant a la qualite de leur prediction. Cet article conteste en particulier le fort degre de generalite que les theories des deux ecoles pretendent atteindre. Il faut donc soit redefinir la notion de generalite, soit admettre une large indetermination dans la tendance des relations interetatiques, soit prendre un autre chemin theorique pour resoudre la problematique.Conflict in the inter-state relations gave rise to an important discussion in International Political Economy. The so-called neo-liberal school, leaning on the theory of absolute earnings, supported the thesis of cooperation between the States, while neo-realists theory is based on the concept of relative earnings and push forward the trend of conflict (though not necessarily war). A critical examination of these theories using the fundamental concepts of the Austrian School (uncertainty, subjectivism, entrepreneurs alertness) is able to show that the neo- liberal and the neo-realist theories are too much optimistic with regard to their predictive nature. The latter do not achieve the generality they pretend to have. The trend of the interstates relations should be admitedly indeterminate unless an alternative theoretical way is taken to solve the issue.
{"title":"``War or Peace\"?: A Critical examination in International Political Economy","authors":"Perrin Pierre","doi":"10.2202/1145-6396.1152","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2202/1145-6396.1152","url":null,"abstract":"Le probleme du conflit dans les relations interetatiques a donne lieu a un debat important en Economie Politique Internationale. Lecole neoliberale, sappuyant sur la theorie des gains absolus, a pris position pour la preeminence de la cooperation entre les Etats, alors que les theoriciens neorealistes, se fondant sur le concept de gain relatif, ont predit une tendance au conflit (sans que celui-ci se limite a la guerre). Une analyse critique de ces theories a partir des concepts fondamentaux de lecole autrichienne (incertitude, subjectivisme, vigilance de lentrepreneur) permet de montrer que les theories neoliberales et neorealistes sont trop optimistes quant a la qualite de leur prediction. Cet article conteste en particulier le fort degre de generalite que les theories des deux ecoles pretendent atteindre. Il faut donc soit redefinir la notion de generalite, soit admettre une large indetermination dans la tendance des relations interetatiques, soit prendre un autre chemin theorique pour resoudre la problematique.Conflict in the inter-state relations gave rise to an important discussion in International Political Economy. The so-called neo-liberal school, leaning on the theory of absolute earnings, supported the thesis of cooperation between the States, while neo-realists theory is based on the concept of relative earnings and push forward the trend of conflict (though not necessarily war). A critical examination of these theories using the fundamental concepts of the Austrian School (uncertainty, subjectivism, entrepreneurs alertness) is able to show that the neo- liberal and the neo-realist theories are too much optimistic with regard to their predictive nature. The latter do not achieve the generality they pretend to have. The trend of the interstates relations should be admitedly indeterminate unless an alternative theoretical way is taken to solve the issue.","PeriodicalId":53483,"journal":{"name":"Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89276771","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ce papier soutient que lindiscipline paradigmatique qui caracterise leconomie Autrichienne contemporaine pourrait etre effacee si les economistes Autrichiens prenaient en consideration lunite doctrinale de Carl Menger dans son essai de construire une theorie subjectiviste des institutions. Construite sur une ontologie et une epistemologie aristotelicienne assortie d une methodologie subjectiviste, lanalyse mengerienne des institutions economiques est le point culminant de sa pensee. Ne cherchant ni lequilibration, ni la coordination, limage mengerienne de leconomie est celle de relations complexes qui emergent au travers de sequences infinies de processus dechange. Larticle conclut en suggerant que le progres soit reconnu comme la norme par les economistes Autrichiens.This paper argues that the paradigmatic indiscipline that characterizes contemporary Austrian Economics can be smoothed out if Austrian economists appreciate the doctrinal unity of Carl Mengers attempt to construct a subjectivist theory of institutions. Building on an Aristotelian ontology and epistemology coupled with a subjectivist methodology, Mengers analysis of economic institutions is the culminating point of his thought. Neither equilibrating, nor coordinating, Mengers image of the economy is that of complex relationships emerging through unending sequences of exchange processes. The paper concludes by suggesting that progress be acknowledged as the norm by Austrian economists.
本文认为，如果奥地利经济学家在试图构建主观主义制度理论时考虑到卡尔·门格尔(Carl Menger)的教条主义lunite，当代奥地利经济学的范式学科就可以被消除。孟格尔对经济制度的分析以亚里士多德的本体论和认识论为基础，以主观主义的方法论为基础，是他思想的高潮。孟格尔对经济的描述既不寻求平衡，也不寻求协调，而是通过无限序列的变化过程而产生的复杂关系。这篇文章的结论是，进步应该被奥地利经济学家视为常态。这篇论文认为，如果奥地利经济学家承认卡尔·门格斯(Carl Mengers)试图构建一种主观主义制度理论的教义统一，那么当代奥地利经济学的范式无纪律特征就可以被消除。Building on an多德ontology and认识论方法,Mengers analysis of economic伴with a subjectivist机构is the culminating point of his thought。经济的不平衡、不协调的形象是通过无休止的贸易过程而产生的复杂关系。这篇论文的结论是，奥地利经济学家承认进步是规范。
{"title":"The Genesis of the 'Austrian' Label: Carl Menger's Thought","authors":"Neelkant S. Chamilall","doi":"10.2202/1145-6396.1162","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2202/1145-6396.1162","url":null,"abstract":"Ce papier soutient que lindiscipline paradigmatique qui caracterise leconomie Autrichienne contemporaine pourrait etre effacee si les economistes Autrichiens prenaient en consideration lunite doctrinale de Carl Menger dans son essai de construire une theorie subjectiviste des institutions. Construite sur une ontologie et une epistemologie aristotelicienne assortie d une methodologie subjectiviste, lanalyse mengerienne des institutions economiques est le point culminant de sa pensee. Ne cherchant ni lequilibration, ni la coordination, limage mengerienne de leconomie est celle de relations complexes qui emergent au travers de sequences infinies de processus dechange. Larticle conclut en suggerant que le progres soit reconnu comme la norme par les economistes Autrichiens.This paper argues that the paradigmatic indiscipline that characterizes contemporary Austrian Economics can be smoothed out if Austrian economists appreciate the doctrinal unity of Carl Mengers attempt to construct a subjectivist theory of institutions. Building on an Aristotelian ontology and epistemology coupled with a subjectivist methodology, Mengers analysis of economic institutions is the culminating point of his thought. Neither equilibrating, nor coordinating, Mengers image of the economy is that of complex relationships emerging through unending sequences of exchange processes. The paper concludes by suggesting that progress be acknowledged as the norm by Austrian economists.","PeriodicalId":53483,"journal":{"name":"Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91134774","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Introduction: Hard Cases and Liberty","authors":"R. MachanTibor","doi":"10.2202/1145-6396.1133","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2202/1145-6396.1133","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53483,"journal":{"name":"Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79648726","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Reply to Norman Barry","authors":"W. Samuels","doi":"10.1515/JEEH-2000-0209","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/JEEH-2000-0209","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53483,"journal":{"name":"Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85540131","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：