首页 > 最新文献

Energy Efficiency最新文献

英文 中文
Correction to: Behavioral barriers to the use of renewable and energy-efficient technologies in residential buildings in Iran 更正:伊朗住宅建筑中使用可再生能源和节能技术的行为障碍
IF 4 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS Pub Date : 2025-11-24 DOI: 10.1007/s12053-025-10383-5
Mohammad Kazemi
{"title":"Correction to: Behavioral barriers to the use of renewable and energy-efficient technologies in residential buildings in Iran","authors":"Mohammad Kazemi","doi":"10.1007/s12053-025-10383-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12053-025-10383-5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":537,"journal":{"name":"Energy Efficiency","volume":"18 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145612488","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Towards 2030 and beyond: assessing future energy efficiency policies and trends using ODEX methodology 面向2030年及以后:使用ODEX方法评估未来能源效率政策和趋势
IF 4 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS Pub Date : 2025-11-24 DOI: 10.1007/s12053-025-10399-x
Matevž Pušnik, Matjaž Česen, Jean-Sébastien Broc, Vesna Bukarica, Jiří Karásek, Wolfgang Eichhammer

Energy efficiency is a central element of the European Union’s approach to achieving its climate and energy objectives, underscoring the need for analytical tools that can support the assessment of future energy efficiency policies and trends. This paper applies the ODEX methodology within a combined ex-post and ex-ante framework to examine projected developments in energy efficiency across sectors. By extending ODEX, traditionally used for retrospective monitoring, to forward-looking national scenarios, the study provides a consistent basis for comparing historical progress with anticipated future improvements. The approach is illustrated using two EU Member States, demonstrating its broader applicability for assessing national strategies and identifying where additional measures may be necessary to meet future final energy consumption targets. The findings reflect patterns reported in recent literature, showing substantial differences in expected efficiency gains across sectors and highlighting areas where progress may need to accelerate to remain in line with EU ambitions. The results also indicate how a top-down, consumption-weighted index such as ODEX can complement existing evaluation practices by offering a transparent way to interpret efficiency trends and by supporting preliminary assessments of energy efficiency policy impacts. While the approach does not replace detailed modelling or bottom-up evaluation methods, it provides a reproducible and data-efficient tool that can assist with cross-country benchmarking, policy evaluation, and ongoing monitoring under the Energy Efficiency Directive. By linking observed trends (ex-post) with forward-looking (ex-ante) scenarios, the framework may contribute to strengthening national and EU-level discussions on future energy efficiency pathways.

能源效率是欧盟实现其气候和能源目标的核心要素,强调需要能够支持评估未来能源效率政策和趋势的分析工具。本文在前后结合的框架内应用ODEX方法来研究跨部门能源效率的预计发展。通过将ODEX(传统上用于回顾性监测)扩展到前瞻性的国家情景,该研究为比较历史进展与预期的未来改进提供了一致的基础。本文以两个欧盟成员国为例,说明了该方法在评估国家战略和确定哪些地方可能需要采取额外措施以实现未来最终能源消费目标方面的更广泛适用性。研究结果反映了最近文献报道的模式,显示了不同部门预期效率提高的巨大差异,并强调了可能需要加快进展的领域,以保持与欧盟的目标一致。研究结果还表明,ODEX等自上而下的消费加权指数可以通过提供一种透明的方式来解释效率趋势,并支持对能效政策影响的初步评估,从而补充现有的评估实践。虽然该方法不能取代详细的建模或自下而上的评估方法,但它提供了一种可重复的、数据高效的工具,可以协助在能源效率指令下进行跨国基准测试、政策评估和持续监测。通过将观察到的趋势(事后)与前瞻性(事前)情景联系起来,该框架可能有助于加强国家和欧盟层面对未来能源效率途径的讨论。
{"title":"Towards 2030 and beyond: assessing future energy efficiency policies and trends using ODEX methodology","authors":"Matevž Pušnik,&nbsp;Matjaž Česen,&nbsp;Jean-Sébastien Broc,&nbsp;Vesna Bukarica,&nbsp;Jiří Karásek,&nbsp;Wolfgang Eichhammer","doi":"10.1007/s12053-025-10399-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12053-025-10399-x","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Energy efficiency is a central element of the European Union’s approach to achieving its climate and energy objectives, underscoring the need for analytical tools that can support the assessment of future energy efficiency policies and trends. This paper applies the ODEX methodology within a combined ex-post and ex-ante framework to examine projected developments in energy efficiency across sectors. By extending ODEX, traditionally used for retrospective monitoring, to forward-looking national scenarios, the study provides a consistent basis for comparing historical progress with anticipated future improvements. The approach is illustrated using two EU Member States, demonstrating its broader applicability for assessing national strategies and identifying where additional measures may be necessary to meet future final energy consumption targets. The findings reflect patterns reported in recent literature, showing substantial differences in expected efficiency gains across sectors and highlighting areas where progress may need to accelerate to remain in line with EU ambitions. The results also indicate how a top-down, consumption-weighted index such as ODEX can complement existing evaluation practices by offering a transparent way to interpret efficiency trends and by supporting preliminary assessments of energy efficiency policy impacts. While the approach does not replace detailed modelling or bottom-up evaluation methods, it provides a reproducible and data-efficient tool that can assist with cross-country benchmarking, policy evaluation, and ongoing monitoring under the Energy Efficiency Directive. By linking observed trends (ex-post) with forward-looking (ex-ante) scenarios, the framework may contribute to strengthening national and EU-level discussions on future energy efficiency pathways.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":537,"journal":{"name":"Energy Efficiency","volume":"18 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12053-025-10399-x.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145612490","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluating co-benefits of energy efficiency policy measures: a holistic framework with case studies from Germany 评估能源效率政策措施的共同效益:德国案例研究的整体框架
IF 4 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS Pub Date : 2025-11-22 DOI: 10.1007/s12053-025-10397-z
Frederic Berger, Iska Brunzema, Swaroop Rao, Florin Vondung, Peter Hachenberger, Barbara Schlomann

Ex-post evaluations of energy efficiency policy measures have traditionally focused on direct impacts such as greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reductions and energy savings. However, rising interest in the broader economic, social, and environmental ramifications of these policies is reshaping evaluation priorities. Notably, alleviation of energy poverty has emerged as a critical co-benefit to be measured, driven by rising energy prices and, in turn driven partially by measures such as the EU Emissions Trading System (EU-ETS). This has resulted in new reporting obligations at both national and European levels. Building on the impact evaluation methodology for energy efficiency policy measures established by Schlomann et al. (2020) that focuses on the direct environmental impacts, the present work presents a transparent, replicable, and robust approach to assess broader policy co-benefits. We focus on fiscal policy instruments and illustrate this with two key co-benefits: employment effects and social benefits. To demonstrate this, we analyse two German programmes, the Environmental Bonus for Electric Vehicles (Umweltbonus) and the Federal Funding for Efficient Buildings (BEG), as case studies. These illustrate how to qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate the effect of policy measures in terms of their co-benefits, specifically additional employment, skill intensity, alleviation of energy poverty (2M), and distributional effects, offering a nuanced understanding of these growing concerns. This paper therefore provides a comprehensive evaluation framework that integrates traditional metrics of direct impacts with assessments of social, economic, and environmental impacts. This holistic approach supports policymakers in understanding the wider implications of energy policies and enables informed, evidence-based decision-making.

能效政策措施的事后评价传统上侧重于温室气体减排和节能等直接影响。然而,对这些政策的更广泛的经济、社会和环境影响的日益增长的兴趣正在重塑评估的优先级。值得注意的是,能源贫困的缓解已成为一项重要的共同利益,需要加以衡量,这一方面受到能源价格上涨的推动,另一方面又部分受到欧盟排放交易体系(EU- ets)等措施的推动。这导致在国家和欧洲两级都有新的报告义务。在Schlomann等人(2020)建立的以直接环境影响为重点的能效政策措施影响评估方法的基础上,本研究提出了一种透明、可复制和稳健的方法来评估更广泛的政策协同效益。我们将重点关注财政政策工具,并通过两个关键的共同效益来说明这一点:就业效应和社会效益。为了证明这一点,我们分析了两个德国项目,电动汽车环境奖金(Umweltbonus)和联邦高效建筑基金(BEG)作为案例研究。这些说明了如何定性和定量地评估政策措施的共同效益,特别是额外的就业、技能强度、缓解能源贫困(2M)和分配效应,提供了对这些日益增长的担忧的细微理解。因此,本文提供了一个综合的评估框架,将传统的直接影响指标与社会、经济和环境影响评估相结合。这种整体方法有助于政策制定者理解能源政策的更广泛影响,并使决策更加明智、基于证据。
{"title":"Evaluating co-benefits of energy efficiency policy measures: a holistic framework with case studies from Germany","authors":"Frederic Berger,&nbsp;Iska Brunzema,&nbsp;Swaroop Rao,&nbsp;Florin Vondung,&nbsp;Peter Hachenberger,&nbsp;Barbara Schlomann","doi":"10.1007/s12053-025-10397-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12053-025-10397-z","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Ex-post evaluations of energy efficiency policy measures have traditionally focused on direct impacts such as greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reductions and energy savings. However, rising interest in the broader economic, social, and environmental ramifications of these policies is reshaping evaluation priorities. Notably, alleviation of energy poverty has emerged as a critical co-benefit to be measured, driven by rising energy prices and, in turn driven partially by measures such as the EU Emissions Trading System (EU-ETS). This has resulted in new reporting obligations at both national and European levels. Building on the impact evaluation methodology for energy efficiency policy measures established by Schlomann et al. (2020) that focuses on the direct environmental impacts, the present work presents a transparent, replicable, and robust approach to assess broader policy co-benefits. We focus on fiscal policy instruments and illustrate this with two key co-benefits: employment effects and social benefits. To demonstrate this, we analyse two German programmes, the Environmental Bonus for Electric Vehicles (Umweltbonus) and the Federal Funding for Efficient Buildings (BEG), as case studies. These illustrate how to qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate the effect of policy measures in terms of their co-benefits, specifically additional employment, skill intensity, alleviation of energy poverty (2M), and distributional effects, offering a nuanced understanding of these growing concerns. This paper therefore provides a comprehensive evaluation framework that integrates traditional metrics of direct impacts with assessments of social, economic, and environmental impacts. This holistic approach supports policymakers in understanding the wider implications of energy policies and enables informed, evidence-based decision-making.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":537,"journal":{"name":"Energy Efficiency","volume":"18 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12053-025-10397-z.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145612514","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Barriers to the adoption of passive heating and cooling systems in residential building design: case study of Iran 在住宅建筑设计中采用被动式供暖和制冷系统的障碍:伊朗案例研究
IF 4 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS Pub Date : 2025-11-21 DOI: 10.1007/s12053-025-10393-3
Mohammad Kazemi, Aliyeh Kazemi

The topic of energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions in the construction industry has been widely discussed. Passive heating and cooling systems are a viable solution to mitigate these impacts. However, implementing these systems during the building design process faces several obstacles. This research focuses on the barriers to adopting passive systems in residential building design, with a case study of Iran. A mixed-methods approach was adopted to investigate these barriers, which included a literature review, semi-structured interviews, and exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. The literature review and semi-structured interviews identified different statements that explained the reasons behind the limited adoption of passive systems in residential building design in Iran. Thirty-nine experts in building energy efficiency evaluated 86 statements using a 5-point Likert scale. Through exploratory factor analysis, 17 sub-categories were identified and grouped into financial, social, training, and legal barriers. Confirmatory factor analysis through structural equation models was utilized to examine the interrelationships among the various obstacles to achieve an optimal outcome. To overcome these barriers, modernizing legal policies, emphasizing energy sufficiency and renewable energy sources, in conjunction with energy-efficient systems is recommended. Additionally, architectural education should provide students with the required knowledge and skills for building passive and active system design. Furthermore, energy efficiency systems should be guaranteed by either the government or the private sector, which could enhance aesthetic appeal and symbolic capital.

建筑行业的能源消耗和温室气体排放问题已经被广泛讨论。被动式加热和冷却系统是减轻这些影响的可行解决方案。然而,在建筑设计过程中实施这些系统面临着一些障碍。本研究的重点是在住宅建筑设计中采用被动式系统的障碍,并以伊朗为例进行研究。采用混合方法来调查这些障碍,包括文献综述、半结构化访谈、探索性和验证性因素分析。文献综述和半结构化访谈确定了不同的陈述,解释了伊朗住宅建筑设计中有限采用被动式系统背后的原因。39位建筑能效专家使用5分李克特量表评估了86项声明。通过探索性因素分析,确定了17个子类别,并将其分为金融、社会、培训和法律障碍。验证性因子分析通过结构方程模型来检验各种障碍之间的相互关系,以达到最佳结果。为了克服这些障碍,建议使法律政策现代化,强调能源充足和可再生能源,并结合节能系统。此外,建筑教育应该为学生提供建筑被动和主动系统设计所需的知识和技能。此外,能源效率系统应该得到政府或私营部门的保证,这可以提高美学吸引力和象征资本。
{"title":"Barriers to the adoption of passive heating and cooling systems in residential building design: case study of Iran","authors":"Mohammad Kazemi,&nbsp;Aliyeh Kazemi","doi":"10.1007/s12053-025-10393-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12053-025-10393-3","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The topic of energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions in the construction industry has been widely discussed. Passive heating and cooling systems are a viable solution to mitigate these impacts. However, implementing these systems during the building design process faces several obstacles. This research focuses on the barriers to adopting passive systems in residential building design, with a case study of Iran. A mixed-methods approach was adopted to investigate these barriers, which included a literature review, semi-structured interviews, and exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. The literature review and semi-structured interviews identified different statements that explained the reasons behind the limited adoption of passive systems in residential building design in Iran. Thirty-nine experts in building energy efficiency evaluated 86 statements using a 5-point Likert scale. Through exploratory factor analysis, 17 sub-categories were identified and grouped into financial, social, training, and legal barriers. Confirmatory factor analysis through structural equation models was utilized to examine the interrelationships among the various obstacles to achieve an optimal outcome. To overcome these barriers, modernizing legal policies, emphasizing energy sufficiency and renewable energy sources, in conjunction with energy-efficient systems is recommended. Additionally, architectural education should provide students with the required knowledge and skills for building passive and active system design. Furthermore, energy efficiency systems should be guaranteed by either the government or the private sector, which could enhance aesthetic appeal and symbolic capital.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":537,"journal":{"name":"Energy Efficiency","volume":"18 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145561467","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Staircase configurations of two-story single-family houses in Mediterranean climate: impact of stack effect on cooling loads and natural ventilation 地中海气候条件下两层独户住宅楼梯配置:烟囱效应对冷负荷和自然通风的影响
IF 4 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS Pub Date : 2025-11-17 DOI: 10.1007/s12053-025-10395-1
Constantinos Vassiliades, Fanourios Kourougianni, Andreas Olympios, George E. Georghiou

The building stock in Europe accounts for almost half of primary energy use, highlighting the need for improved building performance. In the Mediterranean region, where cooling accounts for a significant share of energy consumption, passive strategies play a crucial role in reducing demand while maintaining comfort. Among these, the stack effect has been widely studied for multi-story systems, yet its potential application in staircases of two-story single-family houses, a common design typology in southern Europe, remains underexplored. This study investigates the potential of staircase design to enhance natural ventilation and reduce cooling demand, and evaluates which staircase and window-opening configurations are most effective. A whole-building energy modeling framework for a typical two-story single-family house in the Mediterranean region is developed, incorporating building geometry, construction materials and occupancy patterns, and accounting for coupled heat and mass transfer and interzonal airflows. Various staircase and window-opening scenarios are simulated to assess the stack effect impact on annual heating demand, cooling demand and operational costs for end-users. The results reveal that adding a staircase window in typical houses leads to an increase in energy savings from natural ventilation, ranging between 6–10% compared to relying solely on ground-floor windows. The influence of different building configurations, ventilation strategies, and orientations are examined. The findings provide a basis for architects and engineers to evaluate the feasibility of exploiting the stack effect, and to identify design strategies that maximize economic benefits from natural ventilation.

欧洲的建筑存量几乎占一次能源使用量的一半,这突出了改善建筑性能的必要性。在地中海地区,制冷占能源消耗的很大一部分,被动式战略在减少需求的同时保持舒适性方面发挥着至关重要的作用。其中,堆叠效应已经在多层系统中得到了广泛的研究,但其在两层单户住宅楼梯中的潜在应用(南欧常见的设计类型)仍未得到充分的探索。本研究探讨了楼梯设计在增强自然通风和减少冷却需求方面的潜力,并评估了哪种楼梯和开窗配置最有效。针对地中海地区一栋典型的两层独户住宅,设计了一个整体建筑能源模型框架,将建筑几何形状、建筑材料和使用模式结合起来,并考虑了耦合的传热传质和区域间气流。模拟不同的楼梯和开窗情况,以评估烟囱效应对最终用户的年度供暖需求、制冷需求和运营成本的影响。结果表明,在典型的房屋中增加一个楼梯窗,与仅仅依靠底层窗户相比,可以增加自然通风带来的能源节约,范围在6-10%之间。研究了不同建筑结构、通风策略和朝向的影响。研究结果为建筑师和工程师评估利用烟囱效应的可行性提供了基础,并确定了从自然通风中获得最大经济效益的设计策略。
{"title":"Staircase configurations of two-story single-family houses in Mediterranean climate: impact of stack effect on cooling loads and natural ventilation","authors":"Constantinos Vassiliades,&nbsp;Fanourios Kourougianni,&nbsp;Andreas Olympios,&nbsp;George E. Georghiou","doi":"10.1007/s12053-025-10395-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12053-025-10395-1","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The building stock in Europe accounts for almost half of primary energy use, highlighting the need for improved building performance. In the Mediterranean region, where cooling accounts for a significant share of energy consumption, passive strategies play a crucial role in reducing demand while maintaining comfort. Among these, the stack effect has been widely studied for multi-story systems, yet its potential application in staircases of two-story single-family houses, a common design typology in southern Europe, remains underexplored. This study investigates the potential of staircase design to enhance natural ventilation and reduce cooling demand, and evaluates which staircase and window-opening configurations are most effective. A whole-building energy modeling framework for a typical two-story single-family house in the Mediterranean region is developed, incorporating building geometry, construction materials and occupancy patterns, and accounting for coupled heat and mass transfer and interzonal airflows. Various staircase and window-opening scenarios are simulated to assess the stack effect impact on annual heating demand, cooling demand and operational costs for end-users. The results reveal that adding a staircase window in typical houses leads to an increase in energy savings from natural ventilation, ranging between 6–10% compared to relying solely on ground-floor windows. The influence of different building configurations, ventilation strategies, and orientations are examined. The findings provide a basis for architects and engineers to evaluate the feasibility of exploiting the stack effect, and to identify design strategies that maximize economic benefits from natural ventilation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":537,"journal":{"name":"Energy Efficiency","volume":"18 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145561020","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Scope, scale and strategy: Insights from the evaluation of company specific decarbonization plans 范围、规模和策略:来自公司具体脱碳计划评估的见解
IF 4 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS Pub Date : 2025-11-14 DOI: 10.1007/s12053-025-10384-4
Alexandra Löwenstein, Peter Radgen, Sylvie Ludig, Christian Nissen

This paper presents the first scientific analysis of Germany’s Module 5 funding program, which supports companies in developing strategic decarbonization plans for individual or multiple sites in Germany. Introduced in 2021 as part of the federal funding scheme “Energy and Resource Efficiency in the Economy,” Module 5 focuses exclusively on planning rather than technical implementation. It supports the development of greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction pathways aligned with the GHG Protocol, covering Scope 1 (direct emissions), Scope 2 (indirect emissions from purchased energy), and optionally Scope 3 (value chain emissions). The analysis builds on data from 175 transformation plans evaluated in 2024 as part of an official program review commissioned by the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action (BMWK). While the dataset and basic evaluation originate from that review, the aggregation, interpretation, and reassessment presented here were conducted independently by the authors. Findings confirm that most companies met or exceeded the program’s requirement to demonstrate a 40% reduction potential in Scope 1 and/or Scope 2 emissions over ten years, largely through photovoltaic installations, renewable electricity procurement, and process optimization. Scope 3 was addressed in approximately 35% of the plans but contributed little to overall reductions. Some companies included broader Scope 3 categories beyond travel or energy procurement, though methodological consistency varied. This study offers new insights into the evaluation of planning-based climate policy instruments. It highlights methodological limitations due to the absence of implementation tracking and provides policy recommendations regarding SME inclusion, Scope 3 integration, and ex-post verification mechanisms.

本文首次对德国的模块5资助计划进行了科学分析,该计划支持公司为德国的单个或多个地点制定战略性脱碳计划。作为联邦资助计划“经济中的能源和资源效率”的一部分,模块5于2021年推出,专注于规划而不是技术实施。它支持开发符合《温室气体议定书》的温室气体(GHG)减排途径,涵盖范围1(直接排放)、范围2(购买能源的间接排放)以及可选的范围3(价值链排放)。该分析基于2024年评估的175个转型计划的数据,这是联邦经济事务和气候行动部(BMWK)委托进行的官方项目审查的一部分。虽然数据集和基本评估源自该综述,但本文中提出的汇总、解释和重新评估是由作者独立进行的。调查结果证实,大多数公司都达到或超过了该计划的要求,即在十年内,主要通过光伏安装、可再生电力采购和流程优化,将范围1和/或范围2的排放量减少40%。范围3在大约35%的计划中得到解决,但对总体削减贡献不大。一些公司在旅行或能源采购之外纳入了更广泛的第3类类别,尽管方法的一致性各不相同。这项研究为基于规划的气候政策工具的评估提供了新的见解。它强调了由于缺乏实施跟踪而导致的方法上的局限性,并提供了有关中小企业纳入、范围3集成和事后验证机制的政策建议。
{"title":"Scope, scale and strategy: Insights from the evaluation of company specific decarbonization plans","authors":"Alexandra Löwenstein,&nbsp;Peter Radgen,&nbsp;Sylvie Ludig,&nbsp;Christian Nissen","doi":"10.1007/s12053-025-10384-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12053-025-10384-4","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper presents the first scientific analysis of Germany’s Module 5 funding program, which supports companies in developing strategic decarbonization plans for individual or multiple sites in Germany. Introduced in 2021 as part of the federal funding scheme “Energy and Resource Efficiency in the Economy,” Module 5 focuses exclusively on planning rather than technical implementation. It supports the development of greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction pathways aligned with the GHG Protocol, covering Scope 1 (direct emissions), Scope 2 (indirect emissions from purchased energy), and optionally Scope 3 (value chain emissions). The analysis builds on data from 175 transformation plans evaluated in 2024 as part of an official program review commissioned by the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action (BMWK). While the dataset and basic evaluation originate from that review, the aggregation, interpretation, and reassessment presented here were conducted independently by the authors. Findings confirm that most companies met or exceeded the program’s requirement to demonstrate a 40% reduction potential in Scope 1 and/or Scope 2 emissions over ten years, largely through photovoltaic installations, renewable electricity procurement, and process optimization. Scope 3 was addressed in approximately 35% of the plans but contributed little to overall reductions. Some companies included broader Scope 3 categories beyond travel or energy procurement, though methodological consistency varied. This study offers new insights into the evaluation of planning-based climate policy instruments. It highlights methodological limitations due to the absence of implementation tracking and provides policy recommendations regarding SME inclusion, Scope 3 integration, and ex-post verification mechanisms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":537,"journal":{"name":"Energy Efficiency","volume":"18 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12053-025-10384-4.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145510681","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Decomposition and decoupling analysis of industrial carbon emissions and economic growth: an energy structure perspective from China 工业碳排放与经济增长的分解与解耦分析——基于中国能源结构的视角
IF 4 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS Pub Date : 2025-11-14 DOI: 10.1007/s12053-025-10391-5
Yan Dong, Xiaohua Sun, Yun Wang

Under the strategic goal of carbon peaking and neutrality, accelerating industrial carbon decoupling is one of the key duties for achieving high-quality economic development. This paper focuses on the decoupling effect and decomposition of carbon emissions from the standpoint of energy structure optimization. Based on data from 17 energy categories in 26 industrial sub-sectors at the provincial level in China from 2005 to 2021, we calculate the industrial carbon decoupling index. Then, an integrated method “Tapio + LMDI” is constructed to analyze the decoupling status and its driving factors. The study finds that: (1) The industrial economic growth and carbon emissions in China are in a weak decoupling state. Specifically, most provinces have achieved either weak decoupling or strong decoupling of carbon emissions. A few provinces are in a disadvantageous position of decoupling, mainly concentrated in the northern regions. (2) From the decomposition results, it can be seen that the economic output has become the main factor driving the increase in industrial carbon decoupling. Conversely, the energy structure effect can decrease carbon decoupling, but its contribution is relatively weak, accounting for only 16%. (3) At the regional level, energy structure plays a “supplementary role” in most provinces. The contribution of energy structure optimization to carbon decoupling is usually lower than that of industrial structure optimization or technological progress. (4) At the industry level, energy structure optimization is the conventional way for most energy-intensive and high-emission industries to achieve carbon decoupling. These findings not only provide new empirical evidence for the intrinsic relationship between energy structure and carbon decoupling, but also offer feasible insights for industrial carbon emission reduction in developing countries.

在碳调峰中和的战略目标下,加快工业碳脱钩是实现经济高质量发展的重要任务之一。本文主要从能源结构优化的角度研究碳排放的解耦效应和分解。基于2005 - 2021年中国省级26个工业细分行业17个能源类别的数据,我们计算了工业碳脱钩指数。在此基础上,构建了“Tapio + LMDI”的综合分析方法,分析了二者的解耦状态及其驱动因素。研究发现:(1)中国工业经济增长与碳排放呈弱脱钩状态。具体而言,大多数省份的碳排放实现了弱脱钩或强脱钩。少数省份处于脱钩的不利地位,主要集中在北方地区。(2)从分解结果可以看出,经济产出已成为推动工业碳脱钩增加的主要因素。反之,能量结构效应可以降低碳去耦,但贡献相对较弱,仅占16%。③在区域层面上,大部分省份的能源结构都具有“补充作用”。能源结构优化对碳去耦的贡献通常低于产业结构优化或技术进步。(4)在产业层面,能源结构优化是大多数高耗能、高排放产业实现碳脱钩的常规方式。这些发现不仅为能源结构与碳脱钩的内在关系提供了新的经验证据,也为发展中国家的工业碳减排提供了可行的见解。
{"title":"Decomposition and decoupling analysis of industrial carbon emissions and economic growth: an energy structure perspective from China","authors":"Yan Dong,&nbsp;Xiaohua Sun,&nbsp;Yun Wang","doi":"10.1007/s12053-025-10391-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12053-025-10391-5","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Under the strategic goal of carbon peaking and neutrality, accelerating industrial carbon decoupling is one of the key duties for achieving high-quality economic development. This paper focuses on the decoupling effect and decomposition of carbon emissions from the standpoint of energy structure optimization. Based on data from 17 energy categories in 26 industrial sub-sectors at the provincial level in China from 2005 to 2021, we calculate the industrial carbon decoupling index. Then, an integrated method “Tapio + LMDI” is constructed to analyze the decoupling status and its driving factors. The study finds that: (1) The industrial economic growth and carbon emissions in China are in a weak decoupling state. Specifically, most provinces have achieved either weak decoupling or strong decoupling of carbon emissions. A few provinces are in a disadvantageous position of decoupling, mainly concentrated in the northern regions. (2) From the decomposition results, it can be seen that the economic output has become the main factor driving the increase in industrial carbon decoupling. Conversely, the energy structure effect can decrease carbon decoupling, but its contribution is relatively weak, accounting for only 16%. (3) At the regional level, energy structure plays a “supplementary role” in most provinces. The contribution of energy structure optimization to carbon decoupling is usually lower than that of industrial structure optimization or technological progress. (4) At the industry level, energy structure optimization is the conventional way for most energy-intensive and high-emission industries to achieve carbon decoupling. These findings not only provide new empirical evidence for the intrinsic relationship between energy structure and carbon decoupling, but also offer feasible insights for industrial carbon emission reduction in developing countries.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":537,"journal":{"name":"Energy Efficiency","volume":"18 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145510562","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The drivers and barriers of electricity efficiency: Global patterns, national differences, and the role of ICT 电力效率的驱动因素和障碍:全球模式、国家差异和信息通信技术的作用
IF 4 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS Pub Date : 2025-11-12 DOI: 10.1007/s12053-025-10396-0
Yu-Wen Su

In the IEA's 2050 Net Zero Emissions Pathway, electrification is a key strategy. Transitioning to zero-carbon energy through electrification to replace fossil fuels will inevitably increase electricity demand, making the improvement of electricity efficiency crucial. This study establishes a panel regression model to analyze the factors influencing changes in electricity intensity across 36 countries from 2000 to 2021. Unlike traditional decomposition analysis, regression analysis can consider a broader range of potential influencing factors and is not limited by the homogeneity of samples required in envelope analysis, offering greater analytical flexibility. The estimated results indicate that the main drivers of electricity efficiency are economic growth, extensive deployment of renewable energy, and rising electricity prices. A shift from industry to services slightly improves electricity efficiency. However, the main obstacles to improving electricity efficiency are population growth and less ICT industry exports. Additionally, the study analyzes country-level drivers and barriers of electricity efficiency based on each country's unique economic, industrial, and infrastructural conditions, providing insights into their distinct development patterns.

在国际能源署2050年的净零排放路径中,电气化是一项关键战略。通过电气化替代化石燃料向零碳能源转型,必然会增加电力需求,因此提高电力效率至关重要。本研究建立了面板回归模型,分析了36个国家2000 - 2021年电力强度变化的影响因素。与传统的分解分析不同,回归分析可以考虑更广泛的潜在影响因素,并且不受包络分析所需样品同质性的限制,具有更大的分析灵活性。估计结果表明,电力效率的主要驱动因素是经济增长、可再生能源的广泛部署和电价上涨。从工业向服务业的转变略微提高了电力效率。然而,提高电力效率的主要障碍是人口增长和信息通信技术产业出口减少。此外,该研究还根据每个国家独特的经济、工业和基础设施条件,分析了国家层面的电力效率驱动因素和障碍,提供了对其独特发展模式的见解。
{"title":"The drivers and barriers of electricity efficiency: Global patterns, national differences, and the role of ICT","authors":"Yu-Wen Su","doi":"10.1007/s12053-025-10396-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12053-025-10396-0","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the IEA's 2050 Net Zero Emissions Pathway, electrification is a key strategy. Transitioning to zero-carbon energy through electrification to replace fossil fuels will inevitably increase electricity demand, making the improvement of electricity efficiency crucial. This study establishes a panel regression model to analyze the factors influencing changes in electricity intensity across 36 countries from 2000 to 2021. Unlike traditional decomposition analysis, regression analysis can consider a broader range of potential influencing factors and is not limited by the homogeneity of samples required in envelope analysis, offering greater analytical flexibility. The estimated results indicate that the main drivers of electricity efficiency are economic growth, extensive deployment of renewable energy, and rising electricity prices. A shift from industry to services slightly improves electricity efficiency. However, the main obstacles to improving electricity efficiency are population growth and less ICT industry exports. Additionally, the study analyzes country-level drivers and barriers of electricity efficiency based on each country's unique economic, industrial, and infrastructural conditions, providing insights into their distinct development patterns.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":537,"journal":{"name":"Energy Efficiency","volume":"18 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145510569","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Local community and adoption of solar energy in Iran (Case study of Golestan Province) 伊朗当地社区与太阳能的采用(以戈列斯坦省为例)
IF 4 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS Pub Date : 2025-11-07 DOI: 10.1007/s12053-025-10377-3
Shahrbanu Mirzakhani, Sadegh Salehi

This study examines the role of local communities in adopting solar energy technology in Golestan Province, Iran. The theoretical framework integrates social acceptance of innovation theories by Wüstenhagen et al. (2007) and Upham et al. (2015) with the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) by Davis (1989). Methodologically, this is a survey-based study that collected data via a Researcher-made questionnaire from 400 citizens selected through proportional stratified random sampling combined with multi-stage cluster sampling. Face validity was confirmed by experts, and reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha. Results indicate a positive relationship between independent variables (e.g., perceived usefulness, ease of use, relative advantage, awareness, trust in developers, price evaluation, and user attitudes) and users’ intention to adopt solar energy. Regression analysis shows that independent variables explain 36% of the variance in the dependent variable. Structural equation modeling confirms direct effects of these variables on adoption intention. The combined model effectively explains social acceptance of solar energy, making it suitable for similar studies in other Iranian regions. Based on the findings, local governments in Golestan should implement awareness campaigns, financial incentives, and public education initiatives to promote wider adoption of solar energy technologies.

本研究考察了伊朗Golestan省当地社区在采用太阳能技术方面的作用。该理论框架将w stenhagen等人(2007)和Upham等人(2015)的创新社会接受理论与Davis(1989)的技术接受模型(TAM)相结合。在方法上,本研究采用比例分层随机抽样与多阶段整群抽样相结合的方法,对400名市民进行问卷调查。面部效度由专家确认,信度采用Cronbach’s alpha评估。结果表明,自变量(如感知有用性、易用性、相对优势、认知度、对开发商的信任、价格评估和用户态度)与用户采用太阳能的意愿之间存在正相关关系。回归分析表明,自变量解释了因变量中36%的方差。结构方程模型证实了这些变量对采用意愿的直接影响。该组合模型有效地解释了社会对太阳能的接受程度,使其适用于伊朗其他地区的类似研究。根据研究结果,古巴的地方政府应该开展宣传活动、财政激励和公共教育活动,以促进太阳能技术的广泛采用。
{"title":"Local community and adoption of solar energy in Iran (Case study of Golestan Province)","authors":"Shahrbanu Mirzakhani,&nbsp;Sadegh Salehi","doi":"10.1007/s12053-025-10377-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12053-025-10377-3","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examines the role of local communities in adopting solar energy technology in Golestan Province, Iran. The theoretical framework integrates social acceptance of innovation theories by Wüstenhagen et al. (2007) and Upham et al. (2015) with the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) by Davis (1989). Methodologically, this is a survey-based study that collected data via a Researcher-made questionnaire from 400 citizens selected through proportional stratified random sampling combined with multi-stage cluster sampling. Face validity was confirmed by experts, and reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha. Results indicate a positive relationship between independent variables (e.g., perceived usefulness, ease of use, relative advantage, awareness, trust in developers, price evaluation, and user attitudes) and users’ intention to adopt solar energy. Regression analysis shows that independent variables explain 36% of the variance in the dependent variable. Structural equation modeling confirms direct effects of these variables on adoption intention. The combined model effectively explains social acceptance of solar energy, making it suitable for similar studies in other Iranian regions. Based on the findings, local governments in Golestan should implement awareness campaigns, financial incentives, and public education initiatives to promote wider adoption of solar energy technologies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":537,"journal":{"name":"Energy Efficiency","volume":"18 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145456376","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Life cycle energy assessment of conventional and modular buildings: a case study analysis in the Indian context 传统和模块化建筑的生命周期能源评估:在印度背景下的案例研究分析
IF 4 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1007/s12053-025-10392-4
Pravin Minde, Kaushik Kore

Precast construction provides better quality control, improved site safety, and faster project timelines than traditional RCC (Reinforced Cement Concrete) methods. The push for sustainable building practices has increased in India, yet few studies offer a detailed comparison between conventional RCC buildings and modular alternatives. This study addresses that gap by conducting a comprehensive life cycle energy assessment (LCEA) of both construction types (Traditional RCC building and Light gauge steel frame (LGSF)-Ferron Modular Building in a mid-rise residential project in Maharashtra. Using a hybrid approach that integrates process-based and input–output methods, the study evaluates embodied, operational, and demolition energy, offering valuable insights into the energy efficiency of modular construction in the Indian context. Findings show that operational energy accounts for ~ 83% of total life cycle energy, followed by embodied (~ 15%) and demolition (~ 2%). The LGSF-Ferron building consumes 11.06% less life cycle energy (18,486.54 MJ/m2) than RCC (20,787.26 MJ/m2), mainly due to reduced embodied energy. This difference is specific to the case study and may vary with regional factors. The study provides evidence-based insights into material choices, construction methods, and energy-efficient strategies that contribute to India’s sustainable development goals. However, broader sustainability claims require further analysis of additional environmental impacts. The study also offers actionable insights for architects, engineers, and policymakers to explore energy-efficient modular construction, contributing to sustainable development in India.

与传统的RCC(钢筋水泥混凝土)方法相比,预制结构提供了更好的质量控制,提高了现场安全性,并加快了项目进度。在印度,对可持续建筑实践的推动有所增加,但很少有研究提供传统碾压混凝土建筑和模块化替代品之间的详细比较。本研究通过在马哈拉施特拉邦的一个中高层住宅项目中对两种建筑类型(传统碾压混凝土建筑和轻钢框架(LGSF)-铁模块建筑)进行全面的生命周期能源评估(LCEA)来解决这一差距。该研究采用基于过程和投入产出方法的混合方法,评估了具体能源、运营能源和拆除能源,为印度环境下模块化建筑的能源效率提供了有价值的见解。研究结果表明,运行能量占总生命周期能量的约83%,其次是体现能量(约15%)和拆除能量(约2%)。LGSF-Ferron建筑的生命周期能耗(18,486.54 MJ/m2)比RCC (20,787.26 MJ/m2)低11.06%,主要是由于体现能量的降低。这种差异是个案研究特有的,可能因地区因素而异。该研究为材料选择、施工方法和节能战略提供了基于证据的见解,有助于实现印度的可持续发展目标。然而,更广泛的可持续性要求需要进一步分析额外的环境影响。该研究还为建筑师、工程师和政策制定者探索节能模块化建筑提供了可行的见解,为印度的可持续发展做出贡献。
{"title":"Life cycle energy assessment of conventional and modular buildings: a case study analysis in the Indian context","authors":"Pravin Minde,&nbsp;Kaushik Kore","doi":"10.1007/s12053-025-10392-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12053-025-10392-4","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Precast construction provides better quality control, improved site safety, and faster project timelines than traditional RCC (Reinforced Cement Concrete) methods. The push for sustainable building practices has increased in India, yet few studies offer a detailed comparison between conventional RCC buildings and modular alternatives. This study addresses that gap by conducting a comprehensive life cycle energy assessment (LCEA) of both construction types (Traditional RCC building and Light gauge steel frame (LGSF)-Ferron Modular Building in a mid-rise residential project in Maharashtra. Using a hybrid approach that integrates process-based and input–output methods, the study evaluates embodied, operational, and demolition energy, offering valuable insights into the energy efficiency of modular construction in the Indian context. Findings show that operational energy accounts for ~ 83% of total life cycle energy, followed by embodied (~ 15%) and demolition (~ 2%). The LGSF-Ferron building consumes 11.06% less life cycle energy (18,486.54 MJ/m<sup>2</sup>) than RCC (20,787.26 MJ/m<sup>2</sup>), mainly due to reduced embodied energy. This difference is specific to the case study and may vary with regional factors. The study provides evidence-based insights into material choices, construction methods, and energy-efficient strategies that contribute to India’s sustainable development goals. However, broader sustainability claims require further analysis of additional environmental impacts. The study also offers actionable insights for architects, engineers, and policymakers to explore energy-efficient modular construction, contributing to sustainable development in India.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":537,"journal":{"name":"Energy Efficiency","volume":"18 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145405980","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Energy Efficiency
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1