Pub Date : 2022-12-01DOI: 10.56315/pscf12-22koenig
Sara M. Koenig, C. Wall-Scheffler
{"title":"Discussions about Dispersals: Questions Rising from the Search for Historical Adam","authors":"Sara M. Koenig, C. Wall-Scheffler","doi":"10.56315/pscf12-22koenig","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.56315/pscf12-22koenig","url":null,"abstract":"<jats:p />","PeriodicalId":53927,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86707166","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-01DOI: 10.56315/pscf12-22emberger
G. Emberger
The evolutionary creation model of origins best matches the scientific evidence for evolution with common descent. However, the violence and harm associated with the evolutionary history of life may be viewed as incompatible with religious traditions such as Anabaptist that understand God to be nonviolent as revealed in the life and teaching of Jesus. This article argues that malevolent wills such as fallen angels opposed God's will in the evolutionary process and that explanations for natural evils that do not recognize the corrupting activities of fallen spirit-beings make God culpable for evil and non-Christlike in moral character. In this light, the rejection of the angelic-fall thesis by many writers is surprising. Consequently, a number of common objections to the thesis are examined. The angelic-fall approach to natural evil has biblical support, a long history in the church, support of some current-day theologians, the ability to resist objections, and many useful outcomes.
{"title":"The Nonviolent Character of God, Evolution, and the Fall of Satan","authors":"G. Emberger","doi":"10.56315/pscf12-22emberger","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.56315/pscf12-22emberger","url":null,"abstract":"The evolutionary creation model of origins best matches the scientific evidence for evolution with common descent. However, the violence and harm associated with the evolutionary history of life may be viewed as incompatible with religious traditions such as Anabaptist that understand God to be nonviolent as revealed in the life and teaching of Jesus. This article argues that malevolent wills such as fallen angels opposed God's will in the evolutionary process and that explanations for natural evils that do not recognize the corrupting activities of fallen spirit-beings make God culpable for evil and non-Christlike in moral character. In this light, the rejection of the angelic-fall thesis by many writers is surprising. Consequently, a number of common objections to the thesis are examined. The angelic-fall approach to natural evil has biblical support, a long history in the church, support of some current-day theologians, the ability to resist objections, and many useful outcomes.","PeriodicalId":53927,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83118443","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Science, Faith, and Feminism","authors":"J. Curry","doi":"10.56315/pscf12-22curry","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.56315/pscf12-22curry","url":null,"abstract":"<jats:p />","PeriodicalId":53927,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith","volume":"88 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78981999","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-01DOI: 10.56315/pscf12-22albarracin
D. Albarracín, Julia Albarracín
CREATING CONSPIRACY BELIEFS: How Our Thoughts Are Shaped by Dolores Albarracín et al. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2022. 308 pages. Paperback; $39.99. ISBN: 9781108965026. *Conspiracy thinking is a prominent topic of discussion in American life today--and Christians, with their concern for truth, should not only be informed about, but contributing to, this discussion. This includes awareness of how scholars in the neuro-psychological and social sciences are contributing to our understanding of the nature of conspiracy thinking. *This book investigates the causes of conspiracy thinking in the United States. Its authors draw their findings from existing social scientific literature on conspiracism, general social psychology research, and six empirical statistical studies conducted during the last two years of the Trump presidency (2019-2021): three cross-sectional online surveys, a longitudinal phone panel survey on "deep state" conspiracy claims, a "manipulation" of fear experiment on the alleged relationship between the COVID-19 virus and 5G technology, and a social media study of Twitter hashtags and "fear words." *This book shares many similarities with previous academic works on conspiracy thinking--for example, Hofstadter (1965), Pipes (1997), Robins and Post (1997), Sunstein and Vermeule (2008), Barkun (2013), and Uscinski and Parent (2014)--but distinguishes itself by relying extensively on recent polling data and statistics instead of interviews, case studies, newspaper op-eds, or conspiracist media. Indeed, the authors consciously dispute psychological works that scrutinize the personality traits and life experiences of conspiracy believers, and political science works that link conspiracy fears to power asymmetries. Such approaches, they contend, insufficiently explain the process through which conspiracy beliefs are spread. They argue, instead, that psychological and political factors are themselves shaped by a mixture of personal, media, and social media contacts. *Their central aim is thus to examine how patterns of media consumption shape conspiracy beliefs, habits that are themselves affected by one's pre-existing feelings of anxiety, which is herein defined as a nonspecific "perception of threat [that] depends on relatively stable psychological motivations of belief defense [the desire to maintain a coherent set of beliefs], belief accuracy [the desire to maintain a realistic view of the world], and social integration [the desire for trust, status, and acceptance within a group], as well as sociopolitical factors and situational factors like communications and media exposure" (p. 163). *When these needs are not met, anxiety rises. But whereas desire for belief accuracy produces, on its own, an increase in critical discernment--and hence a decrease in false conspiracy beliefs--the combination of pre-existing anxiety (e.g., feelings of ostracism) with shared conspiracy narratives increases one's predisposition to believe con
{"title":"Creating Conspiracy Beliefs: How Our Thoughts Are Shaped","authors":"D. Albarracín, Julia Albarracín","doi":"10.56315/pscf12-22albarracin","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.56315/pscf12-22albarracin","url":null,"abstract":"CREATING CONSPIRACY BELIEFS: How Our Thoughts Are Shaped by Dolores Albarracín et al. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2022. 308 pages. Paperback; $39.99. ISBN: 9781108965026. *Conspiracy thinking is a prominent topic of discussion in American life today--and Christians, with their concern for truth, should not only be informed about, but contributing to, this discussion. This includes awareness of how scholars in the neuro-psychological and social sciences are contributing to our understanding of the nature of conspiracy thinking. *This book investigates the causes of conspiracy thinking in the United States. Its authors draw their findings from existing social scientific literature on conspiracism, general social psychology research, and six empirical statistical studies conducted during the last two years of the Trump presidency (2019-2021): three cross-sectional online surveys, a longitudinal phone panel survey on \"deep state\" conspiracy claims, a \"manipulation\" of fear experiment on the alleged relationship between the COVID-19 virus and 5G technology, and a social media study of Twitter hashtags and \"fear words.\" *This book shares many similarities with previous academic works on conspiracy thinking--for example, Hofstadter (1965), Pipes (1997), Robins and Post (1997), Sunstein and Vermeule (2008), Barkun (2013), and Uscinski and Parent (2014)--but distinguishes itself by relying extensively on recent polling data and statistics instead of interviews, case studies, newspaper op-eds, or conspiracist media. Indeed, the authors consciously dispute psychological works that scrutinize the personality traits and life experiences of conspiracy believers, and political science works that link conspiracy fears to power asymmetries. Such approaches, they contend, insufficiently explain the process through which conspiracy beliefs are spread. They argue, instead, that psychological and political factors are themselves shaped by a mixture of personal, media, and social media contacts. *Their central aim is thus to examine how patterns of media consumption shape conspiracy beliefs, habits that are themselves affected by one's pre-existing feelings of anxiety, which is herein defined as a nonspecific \"perception of threat [that] depends on relatively stable psychological motivations of belief defense [the desire to maintain a coherent set of beliefs], belief accuracy [the desire to maintain a realistic view of the world], and social integration [the desire for trust, status, and acceptance within a group], as well as sociopolitical factors and situational factors like communications and media exposure\" (p. 163). *When these needs are not met, anxiety rises. But whereas desire for belief accuracy produces, on its own, an increase in critical discernment--and hence a decrease in false conspiracy beliefs--the combination of pre-existing anxiety (e.g., feelings of ostracism) with shared conspiracy narratives increases one's predisposition to believe con","PeriodicalId":53927,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76296569","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-01DOI: 10.56315/pscf12-22davies
Paul Davies
WHAT'S EATING THE UNIVERSE? And Other Cosmic Questions by Paul Davies. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2021. 208 pages. Hardcover; $22.50. ISBN: 9780226816296. *I could not have foreseen Paul Davies's latest book appearing. It is distinctively different from his previous books. Once again, it is beautifully written, as only a renowned physicist with a gift for explaining highly abstract concepts in understandable terms could accomplish. Yet this book is much shorter, much more concise, and lacks the long philosophical musings that made Paul Davies's previous books so enjoyable. It contrasts with his earlier work, The Goldilocks Enigma: Why Is the Universe Just Right for Life?, a brilliant ten-chapter work over three hundred pages long. That book covers the physics of a universe just right for human life and pursues many different philosophical questions and answers. In contrast, What's Eating the Universe? has thirty truly short chapters with just 165 pages of material. Nevertheless, this book is highly recommended, especially for the novice who just wants an overview of the present state of our understanding of physics and cosmology, and a brief foray into some of the big questions. *Davies takes the reader on a journey beginning with the COBE (Cosmic Background Explorer) findings of ripples in the microwave radiation coming to us from every direction. These slight variations in temperature supported the Big Bang model of the universe by connecting the nearly uniform radiation background to galaxy formation with slight "hot spots" necessary to seed the gravity wells, allowing matter to grow from a nearly uniform state to the galaxies we see today. This is just one outstanding example of how scientific investigation has succeeded in explaining our universe. *Davies then presents a historical overview of the major ideas that have contributed to our growing understanding, moving from Copernicus to Einstein. He uses delightful analogies to help the reader grasp the ideas. For example, he uses the analogy of a trained marksman (sharpshooter) to explain how precise the initial expansion of the universe had to be for it to avoid either quickly collapsing or expanding too fast to form stars and galaxies. The many questions addressed by Davies include the speed and shape of space as it expands, the source and nature of matter, including dark matter, and the enigma of dark energy, the cause behind the accelerating expansion of the universe. Davies is a wonderfully gifted writer, and his descriptions are extremely helpful in clarifying these matters. *The title suggests that there are deeply troubling questions about our present understanding of the universe and its governing laws, leaving us with puzzling inconsistencies or paradoxes. And though there are some paradoxes, Davies is the first one to admit that the real story is that our present understanding of the universe via scientific investigation is an overwhelming success. The universe is u
{"title":"What's Eating the Universe? And Other Cosmic Questions","authors":"Paul Davies","doi":"10.56315/pscf12-22davies","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.56315/pscf12-22davies","url":null,"abstract":"WHAT'S EATING THE UNIVERSE? And Other Cosmic Questions by Paul Davies. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2021. 208 pages. Hardcover; $22.50. ISBN: 9780226816296. *I could not have foreseen Paul Davies's latest book appearing. It is distinctively different from his previous books. Once again, it is beautifully written, as only a renowned physicist with a gift for explaining highly abstract concepts in understandable terms could accomplish. Yet this book is much shorter, much more concise, and lacks the long philosophical musings that made Paul Davies's previous books so enjoyable. It contrasts with his earlier work, The Goldilocks Enigma: Why Is the Universe Just Right for Life?, a brilliant ten-chapter work over three hundred pages long. That book covers the physics of a universe just right for human life and pursues many different philosophical questions and answers. In contrast, What's Eating the Universe? has thirty truly short chapters with just 165 pages of material. Nevertheless, this book is highly recommended, especially for the novice who just wants an overview of the present state of our understanding of physics and cosmology, and a brief foray into some of the big questions. *Davies takes the reader on a journey beginning with the COBE (Cosmic Background Explorer) findings of ripples in the microwave radiation coming to us from every direction. These slight variations in temperature supported the Big Bang model of the universe by connecting the nearly uniform radiation background to galaxy formation with slight \"hot spots\" necessary to seed the gravity wells, allowing matter to grow from a nearly uniform state to the galaxies we see today. This is just one outstanding example of how scientific investigation has succeeded in explaining our universe. *Davies then presents a historical overview of the major ideas that have contributed to our growing understanding, moving from Copernicus to Einstein. He uses delightful analogies to help the reader grasp the ideas. For example, he uses the analogy of a trained marksman (sharpshooter) to explain how precise the initial expansion of the universe had to be for it to avoid either quickly collapsing or expanding too fast to form stars and galaxies. The many questions addressed by Davies include the speed and shape of space as it expands, the source and nature of matter, including dark matter, and the enigma of dark energy, the cause behind the accelerating expansion of the universe. Davies is a wonderfully gifted writer, and his descriptions are extremely helpful in clarifying these matters. *The title suggests that there are deeply troubling questions about our present understanding of the universe and its governing laws, leaving us with puzzling inconsistencies or paradoxes. And though there are some paradoxes, Davies is the first one to admit that the real story is that our present understanding of the universe via scientific investigation is an overwhelming success. The universe is u","PeriodicalId":53927,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86754598","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
THE SCIENTIFIC SPIRIT OF AMERICAN HUMANISM by Stephen P. Weldon. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2020. 285 pages. Hardcover; $49.95. ISBN: 9781421438580. *The Scientific Spirit of American Humanism by Stephen Weldon recounts with approval the rise of non-theistic, and even antitheistic, thought in modern science. At the outset, I will confess to being a biased reviewer (perhaps, even, an antireviewer). If I were to tell this story, I would lament, rather than celebrate, the seemingly antireligious stance lauded in this history. I must also confess to being an active participant in this history, both as an amateur student in the fundamentalist/modernist controversy in the Presbyterian churches and in my own active involvement in faith-science discussions among evangelicals in the American Scientific Affiliation (ASA). No historical account is objective--it will always reflect its author's perspective. This is true of this book and of this review. *Weldon tells the history episodically highlighting key people who contributed to this story. He begins in chapter 1, "Liberal Christianity and the Frontiers of American Belief," with Unitarians (theists/deists who reject the deity of Christ), liberal Protestants, and atheistic freethinkers. After a few chapters, he turns to a largely secular story dominated by philosophers rather than ministers. Chapter 12 presents charts that show how the 1933 Humanist Manifesto had 50% signatories who were liberal and Unitarian ministers, while the 1973 Humanist Manifesto II had only 21%. By the end of book, humanism becomes secular/atheistic humanism. Weldon describes humanism as "a view of the world that emphasizes human dignity, democracy as the ideal form of government, universal education, and scientific rationality" (p. 5). While not explicitly mentioned, but likely included in the phrase "scientific rationality," is atheism. The 1973 Humanist Manifest II begins with this theme in its opening article about religion: "We find insufficient evidence for belief in the existence of a supernatural; it is either meaningless or irrelevant to the question of survival and fulfillment of the human race. As non-theists, we begin with humans not God, nature not deity." *Chapter 2, "The Birth of Religious Humanism," tells the early 1900s story of ministers John Dietrich, Curtis Reese, and philosopher Roy Wood Sellers, all who were or became Unitarians. "'God-talk' was no longer useful." Unitarianism ends up being a haven for religious humanists, even for those who have eliminated traditional religious language. These are the roots of today's secular humanism. *In many ways, this era is the other side of the religious history of America that this journal's readers may know. The ASA has roots in the more conservative and traditional end of American Protestantism. The old Princeton Presbyterians, Charles Hodge, A. A. Hodge, and B. B. Warfield, represent a strictly orthodox Christianity, but one open to the advances
第七章“优生学和种族问题”追溯了选择性人口控制如何成为对话的一部分。除了赫胥黎和穆勒,玛格丽特·桑格也是这个故事的一部分。哲学家保罗·库尔兹(Paul Kurtz)在这一章中首次出现,并在本书的其余部分中继续扮演重要角色。他是《人文主义宣言》(Humanist Manifesto)的编辑,并在其中探讨了种族和智商的问题。第八章,题为“人文主义反文化”,描述了一个由人类性和心理问题主导的时期。韦尔登使用“反主流文化”这个词很贴切。在20世纪60年代,女权主义者帕特里夏·罗伯逊和律师兼活动家托尔伯特·麦卡罗表达了性革命的时代精神。卡尔·罗杰斯、埃里希·弗洛姆和亚伯拉罕·马斯洛的心理学将人文主义从更客观/科学的焦点转向更经验的焦点。他们是第三势力(或人文主义)心理学学派的代表,与弗洛伊德的精神分析或斯金纳的行为主义形成鲜明对比。尽管达成一致意见的人很少,但到20世纪90年代末,在保罗·库尔茨(Paul Kurtz)的领导下(受到B. F. Skinner的影响),人文主义的公众形象回归到更科学的倾向。*第9章,“水瓶座时代的怀疑论者”,在这一章中,我发现自己作为一个传统的福音派,几乎完全同意。这一章描述了新时代的信仰,以及上升的神秘主义,是如何受到保罗·库尔茨领导下的科学人文主义者的抨击的。韦尔登甚至引用了《今日基督教》(Christianity Today)的一篇文章,该文章与世俗人文主义者共同抵制西方文化日益增长的神秘主义。我发现这一章是对新时代思想的有益批判。“原教旨主义者的挑战”(第10章)和“与神创论和基督教伪科学作斗争”(第11章)叙述了世俗进化论者和原教旨主义神创论者之间的冲突,特别是在公立学校的科学课程和进化论教学方面。在这里,作者清楚地表明了他的检控主义/反原教旨主义倾向。就我个人而言,提到弗朗西斯·谢弗、r·j·拉什杜尼和科尼利厄斯·凡蒂尔,触动了我自己的历史。虽然保守的长老会中有些人显然是反进化论的,但保守的改革宗阵营中的其他人对沃菲尔德和霍奇的亲科学(包括进化生物学)观点持开放态度,甚至在原教旨主义者反进化论的早期也是如此。虽然美国宇航局的一些人认为自己是年轻地球神创论者或洪水地质学家,但大多数人对旧地球地质学甚至进化生物学持开放态度。韦尔登本人的反应,以及这个时代的其他批评者,似乎更像是一种宗教原教旨主义——尽管是一种自然主义的原教旨主义。原教旨主义者并不是唯一参与文化战争的人。我个人的观点是,即使在私立宗教学校,古地球地质学、旧宇宙(大爆炸)宇宙学和进化生物学也应该作为主流科学共识来教授。但是老师和学生之间应该允许有不同意见和分歧。有时在我看来,这些原教旨主义的神创论者和无神论的进化论者都对灌输比对教育更感兴趣。*嵌入在第10章是人文主义宣言II的历史(保罗·库尔茨合著)。它显然支持与传统基督教正统相反的立场,特别是在明确的反有神论和支持性革命的声明中。但令我吃惊的是,我竟然能在那些强烈反对传统基督教信仰的人身上找到如此多的共识。这告诉我两件事:虽然人与人之间可能存在根本的宗教差异,但在这个世界上,作为人类,基督徒和非基督徒在许多非常基本的问题上走到了一起,比如自由、人类尊严、友谊和和平共处。这些价值观并不是人文主义者、基督徒或其他宗教团体所独有的。第二件事是,我们更善于强调差异,并试图迫使他人遵循我们的方式,而不是容忍差异,说服那些持不同意见的人。*第12章“科学和现代美国的人文主义精神”的开头,再一次让我想到了与评论这本书相关的个人思考。我对自然科学的热爱可以追溯到萨根、阿西莫夫、克拉克、古尔德、道金斯等人,他们把科学的奇迹带给了更广泛的公众。不否认他们的反宗教,甚至反宗教的姿态,值得注意的是,关于自然世界的真理是独立于谁发现或传播它们的。不管你是否承认上帝之手创造了它们,它们都是奇妙的。 无论世界是上帝创造的,还是宇宙本身属性的结果,科学的过程都是有效的。它是整数
{"title":"The Scientific Spirit of American Humanism","authors":"Stephen P. Weldon","doi":"10.1353/book.77969","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/book.77969","url":null,"abstract":"THE SCIENTIFIC SPIRIT OF AMERICAN HUMANISM by Stephen P. Weldon. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2020. 285 pages. Hardcover; $49.95. ISBN: 9781421438580. *The Scientific Spirit of American Humanism by Stephen Weldon recounts with approval the rise of non-theistic, and even antitheistic, thought in modern science. At the outset, I will confess to being a biased reviewer (perhaps, even, an antireviewer). If I were to tell this story, I would lament, rather than celebrate, the seemingly antireligious stance lauded in this history. I must also confess to being an active participant in this history, both as an amateur student in the fundamentalist/modernist controversy in the Presbyterian churches and in my own active involvement in faith-science discussions among evangelicals in the American Scientific Affiliation (ASA). No historical account is objective--it will always reflect its author's perspective. This is true of this book and of this review. *Weldon tells the history episodically highlighting key people who contributed to this story. He begins in chapter 1, \"Liberal Christianity and the Frontiers of American Belief,\" with Unitarians (theists/deists who reject the deity of Christ), liberal Protestants, and atheistic freethinkers. After a few chapters, he turns to a largely secular story dominated by philosophers rather than ministers. Chapter 12 presents charts that show how the 1933 Humanist Manifesto had 50% signatories who were liberal and Unitarian ministers, while the 1973 Humanist Manifesto II had only 21%. By the end of book, humanism becomes secular/atheistic humanism. Weldon describes humanism as \"a view of the world that emphasizes human dignity, democracy as the ideal form of government, universal education, and scientific rationality\" (p. 5). While not explicitly mentioned, but likely included in the phrase \"scientific rationality,\" is atheism. The 1973 Humanist Manifest II begins with this theme in its opening article about religion: \"We find insufficient evidence for belief in the existence of a supernatural; it is either meaningless or irrelevant to the question of survival and fulfillment of the human race. As non-theists, we begin with humans not God, nature not deity.\" *Chapter 2, \"The Birth of Religious Humanism,\" tells the early 1900s story of ministers John Dietrich, Curtis Reese, and philosopher Roy Wood Sellers, all who were or became Unitarians. \"'God-talk' was no longer useful.\" Unitarianism ends up being a haven for religious humanists, even for those who have eliminated traditional religious language. These are the roots of today's secular humanism. *In many ways, this era is the other side of the religious history of America that this journal's readers may know. The ASA has roots in the more conservative and traditional end of American Protestantism. The old Princeton Presbyterians, Charles Hodge, A. A. Hodge, and B. B. Warfield, represent a strictly orthodox Christianity, but one open to the advances","PeriodicalId":53927,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87890681","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-01DOI: 10.56315/pscf12-22winterson
Jeanette Winterson
12 BYTES: How We Got Here, Where We Might Go Next by Jeanette Winterson. New York: Grove Press, 2021. 336 pages. Hardcover; $27.00. ISBN: 9780802159250. *Throughout a set of twelve essays, Jeanette Winterson explores computing through history, culture, and philosophy. She focuses on the values and stories built into technology. She begins with a section titled "The Past" which refers to Ada Lovelace and Mary Shelley, explaining the origins of computing. The section that follows is about "superpowers" and computing. This second section is the most philosophical of the four parts of the book, navigating relationships between current and past philosophies, and explaining how technology influences the way people will think about the world. The third section is called "Sex and Other Stories," which discusses sex and gender and sexism. The concluding section of the book titled "The Future" comprises three concluding essays. *Though I certainly did not agree with all of Winterson's claims, the book felt like one side of a respectful dialogue rather than imposing a singular view of the world. She does not directly state her current religious beliefs, but shares that she grew up as a Christian. Although her current view of the Bible is not clearly stated, she brings it into the discussion frequently and uses a respectful tone to discuss religion. For leaders in faith and technology, 12 Bytes provides thoughtful insights on many different aspects of the assumptions, history, and future of technology and how it shapes society. *Chapter 4: "Gnostic Know-How" is a discussion of religions, AI, and the religion of AI. Winterson compares the faith that many people place in technology to the Christian hope of the resurrection. She is far more critical of the Church of Big Tech than she is of any traditional religion. She very clearly states that faith placed in AI is misplaced, saying, "We could create a god (AI) in our own image--warlike, needy, controlling. It isn't a good idea" (p. 113). *In addition to religion, women are a recurring theme of the book. She starts by introducing the author Mary Shelley and the computing pioneer Ada Lovelace, who are mentioned in later essays as well. In other essays she focuses on women as a group, with trademark sass: "Why wouldn't we want an able, considerate, smart helper who is always available, and mostly free? That used to be called a wife. But then feminism spoiled the party" (p. 78). Multiple essays focus primarily on women, as in "Hot for a Bot," which discusses sex bots as encouraging the objectification of women by building actual objects as replacements. She also discusses women and discrimination in STEM fields in the essay "The Future Isn't Female." *Another significant theme is the economy. Starting with the history of workers' rights and the industrial revolution, she discusses the future of our economy, considering the rapidly changing role of technology. She expresses many concerns about Big Tech and the econ
《12字节:我们如何来到这里,我们将走向何方》作者:珍妮特·温特森。纽约:格罗夫出版社,2021。336页。精装书;27.00美元。ISBN: 9780802159250。*在这12篇文章中,珍妮特·温特森通过历史、文化和哲学来探索计算机。她关注的是科技的价值和故事。她以一篇名为“过去”的章节开始,其中提到了Ada Lovelace和Mary Shelley,解释了计算机的起源。接下来的部分是关于“超能力”和计算的。第二部分是本书四个部分中最具哲学性的部分,它引导了当前和过去哲学之间的关系,并解释了技术如何影响人们思考世界的方式。第三部分是“性和其他故事”,讨论性、性别和性别歧视。该书的结语部分“未来”由三篇结束语组成。*虽然我当然不同意温特森的所有观点,但这本书感觉像是一场相互尊重的对话,而不是强加一种独特的世界观。她没有直接说明她目前的宗教信仰,但她说她是作为一个基督徒长大的。虽然她目前对圣经的看法没有明确说明,但她经常把它带入讨论,并使用尊重的语气来讨论宗教。对于信仰和技术领域的领导者来说,《12 Bytes》提供了关于技术的假设、历史和未来以及它如何塑造社会的许多不同方面的深思熟虑的见解。*第4章:“诺斯底知识”是对宗教、人工智能和人工智能宗教的讨论。温特森把许多人对科技的信仰比作基督徒对复活的希望。她对大科技教会(Church of Big Tech)的批评远远超过对任何传统宗教的批评。她非常明确地指出,对人工智能的信任是错误的,她说:“我们可以按照自己的形象创造一个神(人工智能)——好战、需要帮助、控制欲强。这不是一个好主意”(第113页)。*除了宗教,女性也是这本书反复出现的主题。她首先介绍了作家玛丽·雪莱(Mary Shelley)和计算机先驱艾达·洛夫莱斯(Ada Lovelace),她们在后面的文章中也有提到。在其他一些文章中,她把女性作为一个群体来关注,用她标志性的尖刻口吻说:“我们为什么不想要一个能干、体贴、聪明、随时待命、而且基本上是免费的帮手呢?”那曾经被称为妻子。但是后来女权主义破坏了这个聚会”(第78页)。有多篇文章主要关注女性,比如《对机器人的热情》(Hot for a Bot),其中讨论了性爱机器人通过制造实际物体作为替代品来鼓励女性的物化。她还在文章《未来不是女性》中讨论了STEM领域的女性和歧视。*另一个重要的主题是经济。从工人权利和工业革命的历史开始,她讨论了我们经济的未来,考虑到技术迅速变化的作用。她对大型科技公司和经济表达了许多担忧。她写道:“你想象过你拥有自己的脸吗?拥有是上个世纪的事了。这就是共享经济。我们分享。大型科技公司收集”(第61页)。她认为,将新经济描述为“共享经济”具有讽刺意味,因为共享不是一种金融交易,但我们正朝着交易增加的方向发展。她利用历史和对当今商业惯例的描述,一直到大型科技公司的COVID-19利润,她认为公司应该被迫更负责任。在展望新经济时,她的问题和答案一样多,但她列出了可能指导改革的原则。*我读过很多关于人工智能的书,但我还没有找到另一本像《12 Bytes》这样将现代人工智能和技术与哲学结合在一起的书。它尊重并深思熟虑地考虑了宗教、哲学和技术之间的关系;我向那些有兴趣探索这些联系的人推荐这本书。这本书提出的主要问题不是关于技术的方向,而是人类将何去何从?* Elizabeth Koning,伊利诺伊大学厄巴纳-香槟分校计算机科学系研究生,厄巴纳,伊利诺伊州61801。
{"title":"12 Bytes: How We Got Here, Where We Might Go Next","authors":"Jeanette Winterson","doi":"10.56315/pscf12-22winterson","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.56315/pscf12-22winterson","url":null,"abstract":"12 BYTES: How We Got Here, Where We Might Go Next by Jeanette Winterson. New York: Grove Press, 2021. 336 pages. Hardcover; $27.00. ISBN: 9780802159250. *Throughout a set of twelve essays, Jeanette Winterson explores computing through history, culture, and philosophy. She focuses on the values and stories built into technology. She begins with a section titled \"The Past\" which refers to Ada Lovelace and Mary Shelley, explaining the origins of computing. The section that follows is about \"superpowers\" and computing. This second section is the most philosophical of the four parts of the book, navigating relationships between current and past philosophies, and explaining how technology influences the way people will think about the world. The third section is called \"Sex and Other Stories,\" which discusses sex and gender and sexism. The concluding section of the book titled \"The Future\" comprises three concluding essays. *Though I certainly did not agree with all of Winterson's claims, the book felt like one side of a respectful dialogue rather than imposing a singular view of the world. She does not directly state her current religious beliefs, but shares that she grew up as a Christian. Although her current view of the Bible is not clearly stated, she brings it into the discussion frequently and uses a respectful tone to discuss religion. For leaders in faith and technology, 12 Bytes provides thoughtful insights on many different aspects of the assumptions, history, and future of technology and how it shapes society. *Chapter 4: \"Gnostic Know-How\" is a discussion of religions, AI, and the religion of AI. Winterson compares the faith that many people place in technology to the Christian hope of the resurrection. She is far more critical of the Church of Big Tech than she is of any traditional religion. She very clearly states that faith placed in AI is misplaced, saying, \"We could create a god (AI) in our own image--warlike, needy, controlling. It isn't a good idea\" (p. 113). *In addition to religion, women are a recurring theme of the book. She starts by introducing the author Mary Shelley and the computing pioneer Ada Lovelace, who are mentioned in later essays as well. In other essays she focuses on women as a group, with trademark sass: \"Why wouldn't we want an able, considerate, smart helper who is always available, and mostly free? That used to be called a wife. But then feminism spoiled the party\" (p. 78). Multiple essays focus primarily on women, as in \"Hot for a Bot,\" which discusses sex bots as encouraging the objectification of women by building actual objects as replacements. She also discusses women and discrimination in STEM fields in the essay \"The Future Isn't Female.\" *Another significant theme is the economy. Starting with the history of workers' rights and the industrial revolution, she discusses the future of our economy, considering the rapidly changing role of technology. She expresses many concerns about Big Tech and the econ","PeriodicalId":53927,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78711160","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-01DOI: 10.56315/pscf12-22lapine
M. LaPine
THE LOGIC OF THE BODY: Retrieving Theological Psychology by Matthew A. LaPine. Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2020. 363 pages. Paperback; $26.99. ISBN: 9781683594253. *In this book, the author seeks a theological and biblical response to contemporary neuropsychology, stemming from a need for more effective pastoral care and faith-based counseling.1 LaPine seeks to address a perceived gap between a theological understanding of human agency, and current neuroscience and psychology that leaves pastors and faith-based counselors under-equipped to meet the real mental health and counseling needs they encounter. Although the ultimate purpose is to provide much-needed support for applied pastoral or counseling care, the book is written as a theological reflection to inform a practitioner's theology of practice. *Anchored in the Reformed tradition, LaPine provides an overview of pre-Reformation and Reformed 'theological history in relation to the historical evolution of the field of psychology. Given the scope of these fields, the task of a thorough theology of psychology would take volumes. As a classical Reformed theologian, LaPine uses almost four hundred pages to narrow down the conversation to the theological basis for emotions and neurobiology, specifically through the relationship between the body and mind or spirit. The relationship of will, emotion, biology, spirit, and soul forms the core pieces of this book, around which the chapters revolve. *In his introduction, LaPine presents his "straw man" conflict: the rich spiritual position of faith, against "the modern, reductionist tendency to explain our emotional life exclusively in terms of brain function" (p. xix). At the same time as he points to a distance between (secular) psychology and theology, LaPine also highlights two opposing streams of theology: one that makes the spirit or the spiritual superior to the body or biology, and one that does not. LaPine shows that neuro'psychology values the body and integrates it with the biological facts of emotion and volition (will), whereas mainstream Reformed theology does not, valuing the spiritual in primacy. LaPine notes that this dualism leaves Reformed counselors and pastors without a theology for a more holistic account of human psychology. He states that the Reformed mainstream shows a "lack of psychological nuance" (p. 4), leading to "emotional volunteerism," or the position that people have moral culpability for emotions. In other words, an experience like anxiety becomes a moral sin, to be addressed by prescriptive spiritual re-orientation. The risk here is either a moralistic approach to mental health and human pain, or else abandonment of theology in an attempt to align counseling to contemporary psychological science in practice. Both these options undercut holistic care by undervaluing or ignoring either the body or spirit respectively. *LaPine argues, rightly in my view, that "sufferers simply cannot repent and believe their way out of
{"title":"The Logic of the Body: Retrieving Theological Psychology","authors":"M. LaPine","doi":"10.56315/pscf12-22lapine","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.56315/pscf12-22lapine","url":null,"abstract":"THE LOGIC OF THE BODY: Retrieving Theological Psychology by Matthew A. LaPine. Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2020. 363 pages. Paperback; $26.99. ISBN: 9781683594253. *In this book, the author seeks a theological and biblical response to contemporary neuropsychology, stemming from a need for more effective pastoral care and faith-based counseling.1 LaPine seeks to address a perceived gap between a theological understanding of human agency, and current neuroscience and psychology that leaves pastors and faith-based counselors under-equipped to meet the real mental health and counseling needs they encounter. Although the ultimate purpose is to provide much-needed support for applied pastoral or counseling care, the book is written as a theological reflection to inform a practitioner's theology of practice. *Anchored in the Reformed tradition, LaPine provides an overview of pre-Reformation and Reformed 'theological history in relation to the historical evolution of the field of psychology. Given the scope of these fields, the task of a thorough theology of psychology would take volumes. As a classical Reformed theologian, LaPine uses almost four hundred pages to narrow down the conversation to the theological basis for emotions and neurobiology, specifically through the relationship between the body and mind or spirit. The relationship of will, emotion, biology, spirit, and soul forms the core pieces of this book, around which the chapters revolve. *In his introduction, LaPine presents his \"straw man\" conflict: the rich spiritual position of faith, against \"the modern, reductionist tendency to explain our emotional life exclusively in terms of brain function\" (p. xix). At the same time as he points to a distance between (secular) psychology and theology, LaPine also highlights two opposing streams of theology: one that makes the spirit or the spiritual superior to the body or biology, and one that does not. LaPine shows that neuro'psychology values the body and integrates it with the biological facts of emotion and volition (will), whereas mainstream Reformed theology does not, valuing the spiritual in primacy. LaPine notes that this dualism leaves Reformed counselors and pastors without a theology for a more holistic account of human psychology. He states that the Reformed mainstream shows a \"lack of psychological nuance\" (p. 4), leading to \"emotional volunteerism,\" or the position that people have moral culpability for emotions. In other words, an experience like anxiety becomes a moral sin, to be addressed by prescriptive spiritual re-orientation. The risk here is either a moralistic approach to mental health and human pain, or else abandonment of theology in an attempt to align counseling to contemporary psychological science in practice. Both these options undercut holistic care by undervaluing or ignoring either the body or spirit respectively. *LaPine argues, rightly in my view, that \"sufferers simply cannot repent and believe their way out of","PeriodicalId":53927,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84378744","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-09-01DOI: 10.56315/pscf9-22peterson
J. Peterson
{"title":"The American Scientific Affiliation Has a Stated Position","authors":"J. Peterson","doi":"10.56315/pscf9-22peterson","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.56315/pscf9-22peterson","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53927,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82664114","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-09-01DOI: 10.56315/pscf9-22hausoul
Raymond R. Hausoul
GOD'S FUTURE FOR ANIMALS: From Creation to New Creation by Raymond R. Hausoul. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2021. 284 pages. Paperback; $34.00. ISBN: 9781666703405. *Raymond Hausoul's new book, God's Future for Animals, argues that the place of animals as part of God's intention for the world has not received enough attention as it pertains to how animals have fit into creation in the present time or as a part of the eschaton. It is derived from the author's doctoral dissertation and, as such, it is scholarly in tone and well sourced, at least from the standpoint of theology and church history. Hausoul takes the reader on a journey from the creation as described in Genesis and through biblical history: the consideration of animals by the early church fathers, modern society's relationship with animals, and on to how animals will be viewed during the end times. This is an ambitious task and it makes for very dense reading. The book is about animals but there are lengthy sections in which animals are hardly mentioned, primarily because the author takes considerable time to include details (outlined in a previous book) about the new heaven and new earth. Hausoul also takes a lot of time expanding on the creation story. *At this point in the review, I think that it is fair to be transparent about myself so my biases are clear. I have spent the last 42 years teaching, doing research, and assisting livestock producers in the ways that genetics can be used to improve the efficiency of producing animal products that can benefit humans. With few exceptions, my experience was with livestock producers who took impeccable care of their animals because to do otherwise would compromise the economics of their farm or ranch. I also witnessed producers who cared deeply about the welfare of the animals in their charge. I offer this background because the reader should know why I take considerable issue with the way that the author makes assertions about food that comes from animals, the production methods that are used to produce it, and the people who are involved in the production. *Unlike the detailed literature references concerning theology and church history, Hausoul makes numerous declarations about animals with little or no reference to the literature and, at times, with little or no reference to the reality I experienced and observed. His description of the foot-and-mouth outbreak of 2001 is a case in point (pp. 214-15). This is a very debilitating disease which is highly transmissible. The United States has taken extreme care to ensure that the disease does not enter the country since the last outbreak in 1929. Hausoul implies that it is not very severe and dismisses the need for dramatic measures to eradicate it. He is confused about whether horses are cloven-hoofed (they aren't) and seems puzzled by the fact that horses were not included in the eradication measures (they do not contract foot-and-mouth disease). He also suggests that the cattle producers s
也许他只是简单地接受了所有经文的表面价值,或者从神学角度来说,准确地描述圣经中的事件更直接。我已经提到他接受先祖的极端年龄(第213页)。Hausoul似乎接受了《创世纪》第一章中所描述的六天时间线,并在描述一些更忙碌的日子时做了相当详细的描述。人们接受最初的创造中没有死亡的观点,这意味着一些最初的动物必须经历相当大的变化才能开始吃肉。虽然不是全部,但在某些意义上,动物(包括人类)是食草动物还是食肉动物只是一个选择的问题。这本书最像年轻地球神创论文学的主题是它对创世纪洪水的考虑。有相当多的讨论(包括表格)关于方舟如何容纳所有必要的动物(第93-96页)。*我将用书中的一句话来结束这次回顾,坦率地说,这句话阻止了我的前进:“在与所有动物试过性之后,亚当终于找到了他的伴侣,并熄灭了他的性冲动”(第41页)。Hausoul继续指出,这一观点的发起者可能指的是“智力或精神上的性”(第41页),似乎这为这一观点提供了清晰的解释,或者为什么它是这本书的必要补充。*总的来说,我对这本书的结论是,它非常接近于一个寻找神学的议程。神学上的讨论相当深入,但很难避免这样一种观念,即许多神学观点都是为了同意关于动物及其产品的先入为主的结论。评估这一观点并没有得到事实的帮助,因为几乎所有当代对动物的观察都是在没有相关文献支持的情况下发表的。到目前为止,这是我最重要的批评,尤其是对于一本显然是学术贡献的书。尽管如此,对动物神学感兴趣的读者可以从书中讨论的来源的检查中受益匪浅。*由北达科他州立大学动物科学教授David S. Buchanan审阅,法戈,ND 58108。
{"title":"God’s Future for Animals: From Creation to New Creation","authors":"Raymond R. Hausoul","doi":"10.56315/pscf9-22hausoul","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.56315/pscf9-22hausoul","url":null,"abstract":"GOD'S FUTURE FOR ANIMALS: From Creation to New Creation by Raymond R. Hausoul. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2021. 284 pages. Paperback; $34.00. ISBN: 9781666703405. *Raymond Hausoul's new book, God's Future for Animals, argues that the place of animals as part of God's intention for the world has not received enough attention as it pertains to how animals have fit into creation in the present time or as a part of the eschaton. It is derived from the author's doctoral dissertation and, as such, it is scholarly in tone and well sourced, at least from the standpoint of theology and church history. Hausoul takes the reader on a journey from the creation as described in Genesis and through biblical history: the consideration of animals by the early church fathers, modern society's relationship with animals, and on to how animals will be viewed during the end times. This is an ambitious task and it makes for very dense reading. The book is about animals but there are lengthy sections in which animals are hardly mentioned, primarily because the author takes considerable time to include details (outlined in a previous book) about the new heaven and new earth. Hausoul also takes a lot of time expanding on the creation story. *At this point in the review, I think that it is fair to be transparent about myself so my biases are clear. I have spent the last 42 years teaching, doing research, and assisting livestock producers in the ways that genetics can be used to improve the efficiency of producing animal products that can benefit humans. With few exceptions, my experience was with livestock producers who took impeccable care of their animals because to do otherwise would compromise the economics of their farm or ranch. I also witnessed producers who cared deeply about the welfare of the animals in their charge. I offer this background because the reader should know why I take considerable issue with the way that the author makes assertions about food that comes from animals, the production methods that are used to produce it, and the people who are involved in the production. *Unlike the detailed literature references concerning theology and church history, Hausoul makes numerous declarations about animals with little or no reference to the literature and, at times, with little or no reference to the reality I experienced and observed. His description of the foot-and-mouth outbreak of 2001 is a case in point (pp. 214-15). This is a very debilitating disease which is highly transmissible. The United States has taken extreme care to ensure that the disease does not enter the country since the last outbreak in 1929. Hausoul implies that it is not very severe and dismisses the need for dramatic measures to eradicate it. He is confused about whether horses are cloven-hoofed (they aren't) and seems puzzled by the fact that horses were not included in the eradication measures (they do not contract foot-and-mouth disease). He also suggests that the cattle producers s","PeriodicalId":53927,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76436444","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}