Pub Date : 2024-01-18DOI: 10.1017/s0956618x23000546
John F Stuart
The General Synod of the Scottish Episcopal Church (SEC) met from 7 to 9 June 2023. The meeting was held in hybrid format, with most members attending in person and a small number online.
{"title":"General Synod of the Scottish Episcopal Church","authors":"John F Stuart","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x23000546","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0956618x23000546","url":null,"abstract":"The General Synod of the Scottish Episcopal Church (SEC) met from 7 to 9 June 2023. The meeting was held in hybrid format, with most members attending in person and a small number online.","PeriodicalId":53956,"journal":{"name":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","volume":"264 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139516337","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-18DOI: 10.1017/s0956618x2300056x
Mark Hill
To mark the passing of two decades since the Judicial Committee of the House of Lords handed down their judgment in the appeal of Aston Cantlow and Wilmcote with Billesley Parochial Church Council v Wallbank this article considers the enduring impact of the decision in terms of the constitutional position of the Church of England as a national church and analyses the public and private functions which it undertakes. In the altered landscape of the new Carolean era, with a decline in church attendance and a rise in secularism, it examines the reasoning of the five separate opinions delivered by the Law Lords and evaluates in retrospect various of the issues raised.
为纪念上议院司法委员会对 Aston Cantlow 和 Wilmcote 与 Billesley 教区教会理事会诉 Wallbank 一案的上诉做出判决二十年，本文从英格兰教会作为国家教会的宪法地位的角度，探讨了该判决的持久影响，并分析了英格兰教会承担的公共和私人职能。在教会出席率下降、世俗主义兴起的新卡罗莱时代，该文探讨了上议院五项独立意见的推理，并对提出的各种问题进行了回顾性评估。
{"title":"Aston Cantlow v Wallbank: a twenty-year retrospective","authors":"Mark Hill","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x2300056x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0956618x2300056x","url":null,"abstract":"To mark the passing of two decades since the Judicial Committee of the House of Lords handed down their judgment in the appeal of <jats:italic>Aston Cantlow and Wilmcote with Billesley Parochial Church Council v Wallbank</jats:italic> this article considers the enduring impact of the decision in terms of the constitutional position of the Church of England as a national church and analyses the public and private functions which it undertakes. In the altered landscape of the new Carolean era, with a decline in church attendance and a rise in secularism, it examines the reasoning of the five separate opinions delivered by the Law Lords and evaluates in retrospect various of the issues raised.","PeriodicalId":53956,"journal":{"name":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139518683","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-18DOI: 10.1017/s0956618x2300073x
Nicholas Mostyn
This article critiques the decision of the Court of Appeal in Re SA (Declaration of Non-Recognition of Marriage) [2023] EWCA Civ 1003. In Re SA the Court of Appeal held that: (1) by operation of section 16 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, a voidable marriage is not void at its inception and is therefore not caught by section 58(5)(a) of the Family Law Act 1986, and (2) the effect of section 16 of the 1973 Act is that a voidable marriage starts off fully valid but only on making a decree absolute of nullity becomes invalid. This article contends that the approach adopted by the Court of Appeal in SA is conceptually challenging, based on a misreading of the statutory language, and is directly contrary to long-established and powerful authorities.
本文对上诉法院在 Re SA (Declaration of Non-Recognition of Marriage) [2023] EWCA Civ 1003 一案中的判决进行了评论。在 Re SA 一案中，上诉法院认为(1) 根据《1973 年婚姻诉讼法》第 16 条的规定，可撤销的婚姻在开始时并非无效，因此不受《1986 年家庭法》第 58(5)(a)条的约束；以及 (2) 《1973 年婚姻诉讼法》第 16 条的效果是，可撤销的婚姻在开始时完全有效，但只有在作出无效的绝对判决时才会无效。本文认为，南澳大利亚州上诉法院采用的方法在概念上具有挑战性，其依据是对法律语言的误读，并且直接违背了长期以来确立的有力权威。
{"title":"Voidable marriages","authors":"Nicholas Mostyn","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x2300073x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0956618x2300073x","url":null,"abstract":"This article critiques the decision of the Court of Appeal in <jats:italic>Re SA (Declaration of Non-Recognition of Marriage)</jats:italic> [2023] EWCA Civ 1003. In <jats:italic>Re SA</jats:italic> the Court of Appeal held that: (1) by operation of section 16 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, a voidable marriage is not void at its inception and is therefore not caught by section 58(5)(a) of the Family Law Act 1986, and (2) the effect of section 16 of the 1973 Act is that a voidable marriage starts off fully valid but only on making a decree absolute of nullity becomes invalid. This article contends that the approach adopted by the Court of Appeal in <jats:italic>SA</jats:italic> is conceptually challenging, based on a misreading of the statutory language, and is directly contrary to long-established and powerful authorities.","PeriodicalId":53956,"journal":{"name":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139518650","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-18DOI: 10.1017/s0956618x23000534
Cate Turner
The Church of Ireland General Synod had been held online in 2021 and in person in 2022. This year – the third meeting of the triennium – the first two days were held in Clayton White's Hotel, Wexford (Friday 12 May and Saturday 13 May) with day 3 taking place remotely on the evening of Tuesday 16 May. (Another evening, Thursday 18 May, had also been set aside for meeting but this was not required.)
{"title":"General Synod of the Church of Ireland","authors":"Cate Turner","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x23000534","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0956618x23000534","url":null,"abstract":"The Church of Ireland General Synod had been held online in 2021 and in person in 2022. This year – the third meeting of the triennium – the first two days were held in Clayton White's Hotel, Wexford (Friday 12 May and Saturday 13 May) with day 3 taking place remotely on the evening of Tuesday 16 May. (Another evening, Thursday 18 May, had also been set aside for meeting but this was not required.)","PeriodicalId":53956,"journal":{"name":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","volume":"101 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139516090","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-18DOI: 10.1017/s0956618x23000522
Matthew Chinery
The Governing Body of the Church in Wales met twice in 2023, at Venue Cymru in Llandudno on 19–20 April and at the International Conference Centre in Newport on 5–6 September.
{"title":"Governing Body of the Church in Wales","authors":"Matthew Chinery","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x23000522","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0956618x23000522","url":null,"abstract":"The Governing Body of the Church in Wales met twice in 2023, at Venue Cymru in Llandudno on 19–20 April and at the International Conference Centre in Newport on 5–6 September.","PeriodicalId":53956,"journal":{"name":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139515987","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-18DOI: 10.1017/s0956618x23000613
Frank Cranmer
The Bill of Rights Bill was withdrawn on 27 June, signalling what appears to be a major change of policy. After the withdrawal announcement had been made, The Times quoted Dominic Raab as suggesting that ‘All the wrong people will celebrate’ – among whom is your correspondent.
{"title":"June to September 2023","authors":"Frank Cranmer","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x23000613","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0956618x23000613","url":null,"abstract":"The Bill of Rights Bill was withdrawn on 27 June, signalling what appears to be a major change of policy. After the withdrawal announcement had been made, <jats:italic>The Times</jats:italic> quoted Dominic Raab as suggesting that ‘All the wrong people will celebrate’ – among whom is your correspondent.","PeriodicalId":53956,"journal":{"name":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","volume":"256 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139516581","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-18DOI: 10.1017/s0956618x23000558
Jason Lingiah
The Assembly met on 20–25 May with the Right Rev'd Sally Foster-Fulton BA BD as Moderator. She is Head of Christian Aid in Scotland and has served as a Parish Minister in the Church of Scotland and in the Presbyterian Church (USA). The Rt Hon Lord Hodge DPSC was re-appointed by His Majesty as Lord High Commissioner to the General Assembly for a second year. The Church has roughly 284,000 members (2021 figures) and around 1,200 charges.
大会于 5 月 20-25 日举行，由莎莉-福斯特-富尔顿牧师（Right Rev'd Sally Foster-Fulton BA BD）担任主持人。她是苏格兰基督教援助组织的负责人，曾担任苏格兰教会和美国长老会的教区牧师。霍奇勋爵（Rt Hon Lord Hodge DPSC）被国王陛下再次任命为大会高级专员，任期为第二年。教会约有284,000名成员（2021年的数字）和约1,200名教士。
{"title":"General Assembly of the Church of Scotland","authors":"Jason Lingiah","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x23000558","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0956618x23000558","url":null,"abstract":"The Assembly met on 20–25 May with the Right Rev'd Sally Foster-Fulton BA BD as Moderator. She is Head of Christian Aid in Scotland and has served as a Parish Minister in the Church of Scotland and in the Presbyterian Church (USA). The Rt Hon Lord Hodge DPSC was re-appointed by His Majesty as Lord High Commissioner to the General Assembly for a second year. The Church has roughly 284,000 members (2021 figures) and around 1,200 charges.","PeriodicalId":53956,"journal":{"name":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139516000","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-18DOI: 10.1017/s0956618x23000583
Martin Warner
This Comment, based substantially on a lecture delivered to the Ecclesiastical Law Society on 5 July 2023, will explore how bishops engage with the legislature, comparing the example of Bishop George Bell in the last century with a rather different example in the present century, namely Pope Benedict XVI and his address to members of Parliament in Westminster Hall in 2010. The comparison will, I hope, indicate some historic dimensions to the issues of episcopacy, law and government that are pertinent today.
{"title":"Episcopacy, law and government","authors":"Martin Warner","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x23000583","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0956618x23000583","url":null,"abstract":"This Comment, based substantially on a lecture delivered to the Ecclesiastical Law Society on 5 July 2023, will explore how bishops engage with the legislature, comparing the example of Bishop George Bell in the last century with a rather different example in the present century, namely Pope Benedict XVI and his address to members of Parliament in Westminster Hall in 2010. The comparison will, I hope, indicate some historic dimensions to the issues of episcopacy, law and government that are pertinent today.","PeriodicalId":53956,"journal":{"name":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","volume":"193 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139518684","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-01DOI: 10.1017/s0956618x23000364
D. Willink
{"title":"McCalla v Lichfield Diocesan Board of Finance","authors":"D. Willink","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x23000364","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0956618x23000364","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53956,"journal":{"name":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","volume":"25 1","pages":"397 - 397"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48603987","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：