Telemedicine and e-Health最新文献

Over 80% of maternal deaths are preventable. Telehealth approaches can help address disparities by increasing access to quality maternal health care. In this position statement, we advocate for the utility of telehealth to address maternal mortality disparities, focusing specifically on the postpartum period, where most maternal deaths occur. Specifically, we describe how telehealth visits, mobile health applications, and wearable devices for remote patient monitoring can be used to promote the uptake of postpartum care and adherence to evidence-based treatment for the most common causes of maternal death (i.e., cardiovascular conditions and mental health-related conditions). We discuss challenges that must be overcome to ensure the broad and equitable reach of telehealth and identify specific action steps to address this pressing public health issue.

Background: Barriers to attending family-centered rounds (FCR) exist for socially disadvantaged families. Using telehealth to conduct virtual FCR could potentially promote equitable parent/guardian FCR access. The objective of this work was to assess whether the effects of a virtual FCR intervention on parent FCR attendance varied by subgroups defined by social factors. Methods: We conducted a post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial of virtual FCR in the neonatal intensive care unit. Parents of intervention arm infants were invited to participate in virtual FCR plus usual care; control arm infants received usual care. Participants were analyzed according to the assigned group and by race/ethnicity, insurance, mother's education, and neighborhood health conditions. We used Poisson regression to estimate and compare FCR parent attendance rates. Heterogeneity of intervention effects was assessed using interaction terms to evaluate the relative benefit of the intervention in increasing parent FCR attendance. Results: We included all enrolled trial subjects (74 intervention, 36 control). Intervention arm infants had 3.36 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.66-4.23) times the FCR parent attendance rate of subjects in the control arm. Compared with the corresponding reference subgroup, intervention benefits were 2.15 times (95% CI: 1.30-3.56) better for racial/ethnic minorities, 3.08 times (95% CI: 1.59-5.95) better for those with private insurance, 2.68 times (95% CI: 1.12-6.40) better for those whose mother reported no college education, and 4.14 times (95% CI: 2.07-8.25) better for those from a neighborhood with worse health conditions. Conclusions: Virtual FCR improved parent FCR attendance overall, with even greater benefits for certain subgroups. Further research is needed to mitigate the differential benefit demonstrated for privately insured subjects.

Background: Telemedicine has become a global tool for enhancing health care accessibility. However, its widespread adoption is still limited by technological illiteracy, lack of appropriate devices, slow internet services, and privacy concerns. In the Middle East and North Africa, including the United Arab Emirates (UAE), there is a dearth of telemedicine research. This study aimed to understand the perceptions and satisfaction levels of the UAE population regarding telemedicine. Methods: Between June and September 2023, a cross-sectional study was undertaken, using an online questionnaire distributed among UAE citizens and residents aged 18 years and above. The survey aimed to gauge the perceptions, usability, and satisfaction levels of telemedicine users, alongside identifying barriers hindering its acceptance. Data analysis was performed using Python 3, using Matplotlib v3.3.4 and Pandas v1.2. Results: The data analysis encompassed 1,013 participants, among whom 66.9% (678/1,013) were familiar with telemedicine. From this group, 29.8% (202/678) had previously utilized it. Of these users, 92.3% (186/202) found it to be useful or highly useful, whereas 83.1% (168/202) expressed overall satisfaction with their telemedicine experience. Among those who had not used telemedicine (47%, 476/1,013), the predominant concerns were a preference for in-person health care consultations for better care (77%, 367/476) and uncertainty about the quality of care offered through telemedicine (62%, 296/476). Conclusions: Despite high awareness of telemedicine in the UAE, its actual usage remains limited, highlighting the necessity for increased promotional efforts. Nevertheless, positive feedback suggests considerable potential for broad adoption. Future studies should address participants' concerns to enhance telemedicine utilization in the region.

Introduction: Evaluating physician perceptions of telemedicine use and its impact on care quality among physician providers is critical to sustaining telemedicine programs, given the uncertainty of reimbursement policy, preferences, inadequate training, and technical difficulties. Physicians reported technical barriers to effectively practicing integrated medicine using telemedicine as patient volumes increased during the pandemic. The objective of this work was to examine whether perceived practice barriers and facilitators were associated with physician respondents' perceptions of telemedicine care quality compared with in-person care. Methods: This cross-sectional study analyzed the 2021 National Electronic Health Record Survey. The sample comprised 1,857 nonfederally employed physicians (weighted n = 403,013) delivering integrated patient care. Of those physicians, 1,630 (weighted n = 346,646) reported providing care through telemedicine. We reported frequencies and percentages of reported practice characteristics. Generalized ordinal logistic regressions examined relationships between practice factors and care quality for telemedicine care. Results: Most of the sample (n = 1,630) were male (66.1%), >50 years of age (66.1%), and worked in a single location (73.5%). A total of 70% of respondents reported that patients had difficulty using telemedicine platforms, and 64% reported limitations in patients' access to technology. Most respondents indicated having provided quality care to some extent (45%) and to a great extent (26%) during telemedicine visits compared to in-person visits. Associations between barriers, facilitators, and care quality perceptions were positive, underscoring resiliency in telemedicine programs among practices. Conclusion: Care modalities and the organizational, environmental, and personal facilitators drive quality perceptions among physicians. Perceived fit and usability determine perceptions of care quality for providers integrating telemedicine into their practice.

Introduction: Musculoskeletal ailments exert a significant impact on global populations. To address challenges posed by geographical constraints and financial limitations, physiotherapists have explored and found telerehabilitation to be a viable solution. Despite its proven effectiveness in clinical practice, the integration of telerehabilitation has been sluggish. This cross-sectional survey sought to delve into the perspectives and readiness of physiotherapists in Malaysia regarding telerehabilitation for musculoskeletal disorders. Methods: A customized survey instrument was developed and evaluated for face validity and reliability. The 36-item questionnaire was distributed through the Google Form platform, targeting respondents via social media channels such as Facebook and WhatsApp. Data analysis used descriptive statistics (frequency and percentage). Results: The survey garnered responses from 271 physiotherapists. A majority (76.3%, n = 202) expressed agreement regarding the potential benefits of telerehabilitation in physiotherapy practice. About 77% of the respondents also showcased greater readiness for monitoring client progress through telerehabilitation as opposed to assessment and treatment. Notable benefits identified by respondents included preventing cross-infection (98.5%) and reducing travel time for both clients (94.0%) and physiotherapists (90.6%). Conclusion: The study reveals that physiotherapists in Malaysia exhibit positive attitudes and preparedness for implementing telerehabilitation in managing musculoskeletal conditions.

The promise of remote patient monitoring (RPM) lies in its ability to revolutionize health care delivery by enabling continuous, real-time tracking of patient health outside traditional clinical settings. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of RPM, particularly in underserved and rural populations, highlighting both its potential and the persistent barriers that limit its widespread use. This paper explores the critical role of technological advancements-such as wearables, artificial intelligence (AI), and broadband expansion-in sustaining and optimizing RPM in the postpandemic era. We examine Michigan as a microcosm of national health care challenges, focusing on its diverse population and geographic barriers, and propose condition-specific RPM protocols to address these inequities. Key facilitators and barriers to RPM implementation are discussed, with a focus on AI integration, community engagement, and digital infrastructure. We also explore the role of policy reform and public-private partnerships in supporting RPM's scalability and long-term sustainability. Our findings suggest that while RPM offers a powerful tool for improving health care access and outcomes, especially for chronic conditions and rural maternal health, sustained investment in technology and infrastructure is critical. By addressing these challenges, RPM can become a cornerstone of modern health care, reducing disparities and improving care delivery for underserved populations.

Background: Children with medical complexity (CMC) account for high health care utilization. Telemedicine holds significant potential in CMC, as it allows a provider to engage with CMC in their home environment and can alleviate both financial and transportation burdens. Remote exam devices that enable the performance of a physical exam could expand the ability of providers to clinically assess CMC during a telemedicine visit. In this pilot study, our goal was to develop a process for integrating an in-home remote exam device into a complex care clinic during the COVID-19 pandemic and evaluate the usability and feasibility of this device. Methods: The remote exam device was distributed to caregivers of CMC cared for at a complex care outpatient center. Using deliberate practice framework, our onboarding process provided opportunities for caregivers and providers to learn how to utilize the device. Surveys examining usability and feasibility were administered to both caregivers and providers after each telemedicine encounter. Results: A total of 43 caregivers participated in the onboarding process, which included a total of 83 practice visits. The remote exam device was rated as having excellent usability by caregivers; however, providers rated the device as having lower usability. Feasibility was notable for technology issues contributing to 15% of encounters being cancelled or ending early. Conclusions: The remote exam device was successfully integrated into a complex care clinic. Data from this pilot study supports the usability and feasibility of deploying a remote exam device across a telemedicine platform in a busy and complex outpatient academic practice.

Background: This systematic review of teleophthalmology services in Australia, the United States of America (USA), Canada, and the United Kingdom (UK) during the COVID-19 pandemic is aimed to evaluate changes in teleophthalmology, comparing them to New Zealand (NZ). Methods: A literature search of electronic databases Scopus, Proquest, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and Google was conducted using search terms: telemedicine, ophthalmology, teleophthalmology/teleophthalmology, and COVID/COVID-19/coronavirus/covid-pandemic. Studies describing teleophthalmology services created in response to COVID-19 restrictions from March 1, 2020, to January 31, 2024, were analyzed. Results: Of the articles, 37 describing 29 discrete teleophthalmology services were included. There were 15 services in the USA, seven in the UK, two in Canada, two in Australia, and three in NZ. The models of care in the USA were well described, and teleophthalmology was used for general, external, anterior segment, neuro-ophthalmology, and oculoplastic consults, as well as for grading of fundus images in the emergency department setting. In the UK, teleophthalmology was used for general eye care, oculoplastics, and pediatric ophthalmology. In Australia, teleophthalmology was used for postglaucoma surgery monitoring of Intraocular Pressure. In NZ, teleophthalmology was used for general eye consults and triaging, but no formal models were described. Conclusion: COVID-19 offered a unique opportunity for re-examination and expansion of teleophthalmology services globally. Video-based and home-screening teleophthalmology services are feasible but have limitations. Investing in multidisciplinary and community-based technology partnerships can create more equitable teleophthalmology care models (to complement and, when necessary, replace traditional in-person consults), within existing frameworks, making eye care more accessible and efficient.

Background: Patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) represent a high-risk population due to increased rates of adverse health outcomes and death. To evaluate whether telehealth utilization during OUD treatment compared with in-person encounters alone was associated with emergency department (ED) utilization, inpatient admissions, and mortality within three years of initiating buprenorphine. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study within the Veterans Health Administration among Veterans treated for OUD between 2012 and -2022. The primary exposure was modality of care, characterized as telehealth encounters (with or without an in-person visit) compared with in-person visits only. Outcomes included an ED visit, inpatient admission, or mortality within three years of the index buprenorphine prescription. We measured the association between each type of treatment modality and outcomes through Cox proportional hazards regression modeling, adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates and confounders. Findings: Of the 57,021 Veterans diagnosed with OUD and who initiated buprenorphine, 38,072 Veterans met study eligibility criteria. The majority of Veterans were male, non-Hispanic White, 25-44 years of age, and lived in urban areas. Approximately 60% of this entire cohort experienced at least one ED visit, 40% experienced an inpatient admission, and 8% died during follow-up. Telehealth use compared with in-person visits only was associated with reduced ED visits (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77-0.85), inpatient admissions (aHR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.67-0.76), and mortality (aHR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.67-0.94). Conclusions: Telehealth may help overcome barriers to in-person care. During buprenorphine treatment for OUD, telehealth as a point of contact with providers and the health care system may reduce more adverse health outcomes, potentially through improving treatment retention. Qualitative studies may help shed light on the mechanisms through which telehealth directly impacts clinical outcomes.

Background: Telemedicine is an effective method to monitor patients at home and improve outcomes of heart failure (HF), especially HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, little is known about the impact of telemedicine on the quality of life (QoL) among outpatients with HFrEF in lower-middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods: In this single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled, open, and parallel-group clinical trial in northern Vietnam, patients with HFrEF were allocated to either telemedicine or control groups. Participants in the experimental arm underwent a home-based telemedicine program with regular telephone follow-ups and consultations. Participants in the control group received usual care. Both groups were followed for 6 months. The primary outcome was the change in Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) score from baseline. The analysis was conducted on an intention-to-treat basis. Results: A total of 223 participants were randomized into two groups-the telemedicine group and the usual care group. Of the 223, 170 patients [mean age: 61.5 ± 15.0 years; female: 122 (71.8%)] completed follow-up and were included in the final analysis (87 in the telemedicine group and 83 in the usual care group). At baseline, the MLHFQ scores were equivalent between the two groups (median [interquartile range]: 81 [73-92] vs. 81 [74-92]; p = 0.992). After 6-month follow-up, the telemedicine group showed greater improvement in MLHFQ total scores than the usual care group (mean change in MLHFQ score: -15.5 ± 14.0 vs. -1.3 ± 6.2; difference in change: -14.2 [95% confidence interval, CI: -17.5, -11.0]; p < 0.0001). Similar results were found for the MLHFQ physical dimension score (difference in change: -5.8 [95% CI: -7.4, -4.1]; p < 0.0001) and the MLHFQ emotional dimension score (difference in change: -3.2 [95% CI: -4.2, -2.2]; p < 0.0001). Conclusions: In this study, a telemedicine intervention significantly improved QoL compared with usual care among patients with HFrEF in an LMIC.