Telemedicine and e-Health最新文献

Background: The availability and utilization of telehealth services have been rapidly increasing in the past decade, which paved the way for ophthalmological care to be offered more easily and conveniently. However, the proficiency of telehealth in the context of ophthalmical care still requires further studies to prove its effectiveness. This study examined the proficiency of general practitioners in a telemedicine platform in identifying red flag symptoms, suggestive of retinal detachment, and devising optimal management strategies. Methods: Our cross-sectional study used chat-based consultations on Altibbi Telemedicine platform (2018-2023) to study ophthalmical patients presenting with "blurred vision" or "blindness." Those endorsing red flag symptoms were categorized as having "positive symptomatology" and those reporting none as having "negative symptomatology." Management plans were classified as referral or reassuring. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM's Statistical Package for Social Sciences to examine associations between symptomatology and other variables. p values below 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: Five hundred and fifty (n = 550) patients with a mean age 22.5 ± 13 years were included. Patients expressing positive symptomatology were more likely to be referred relative to those expressing negative symptomatology (81% vs. 61%, p < 0.001). No significant difference was found between genders and referral (p = 0.053) or age and referral (p = 0.231). Multivariate regression showed a significant correlation between positive symptoms and referral (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.0; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.3-3.3), none between gender (aOR: 1.5; 95% CI: 0.9-2.2) or age (aOR: 1.0; 95% CI: 0.9-1.1) and referral odds. Conclusion: The telemedicine platform studied is effective in referring cases with red flag symptoms to urgent care, regardless of age and gender.

Background: The rise of virtual healthcare underscores the transformative influence of digital technologies in reshaping the healthcare landscape. As technology advances and the global demand for accessible and convenient healthcare services escalates, the virtual healthcare sector is gaining unprecedented momentum. Saudi Arabia, with its ambitious Vision 2030 initiative, is actively embracing digital innovation in the healthcare sector. Methods: In this narrative review, we discussed the key drivers and prospects of virtual healthcare in Saudi Arabia, highlighting its potential to enhance healthcare accessibility, quality, and patient outcomes. We also summarized the role of the COVID-19 pandemic in the digital transformation of healthcare in the country. Healthcare services provided by Seha Virtual Hospital in Saudi Arabia, the world's largest and Middle East's first virtual hospital, were also described. Finally, we proposed a roadmap for the future development of virtual health in the country. Results and conclusions: The integration of virtual healthcare into the existing healthcare system can enhance patient experiences, improve outcomes, and contribute to the overall well-being of the population. However, careful planning, collaboration, and investment are essential to overcome the challenges and ensure the successful implementation and sustainability of virtual healthcare in the country.

Background: After-hours telemedicine services for emergency care are thought to offer a solution for patients who live at a distance from traditional face-to-face emergency services. This study evaluates such a service in a Health Maintenance Organization, focusing on the differences between central and peripheral populations. Methods: In this cross-sectional database study, we collected data regarding the encounter and patient characteristics, including prescriptions, referrals for further evaluation in a traditional emergency department (ED), and the distance from a traditional ED. Other outcome measures included health care utilization after the encounter such as primary care physician (PCP) encounters, additional telemedicine encounters, ED visits, and hospitalization. Results: In total, 45,411 patient visits were analyzed. Medication was prescribed in 25% of the encounters, and a referral to an ED was given in 22%. In total, 17.7% of the patients visited an ED within 24 h of the index encounter. In total, 64.8% of patients visited a PCP in the following 30 days. No further care was needed in 32.4% of the encounters. In multivariable logistic regression, the odds of using the service were lower for low socio-economic status groups and inhabitants of the periphery than the central areas. A weak reverse correlation was observed in Jewish sectors regarding distance from traditional ED, whereas no correlation was found in the Arab sector. Conclusion: It is commonly believed that telemedicine overcomes geographical barriers. The results of this research do not support this hypothesis.

Background: Cochlear implants and hearing aids may facilitate the development of listening and spoken language (LSL) in deaf/hard of hearing young children, but they require aural rehabilitation therapy-often unavailable outside urban areas-for optimal outcomes. This trial assessed the relative effectiveness of LSL therapy delivered either in person or by interactive video. The hypothesis was that telehealth service delivery would be noninferior to in-person therapy. Methods: Most parents refused randomization of their children to telehealth or in-person conditions; therefore, randomization was impossible. In consultation with the funder (NIDCD), the study design was modified. Parents were allowed to select their preferred study condition, and the study team was blinded to group membership. Forty-two families were in the in-person group and 35 in telehealth (40 and 30, respectively, after attrition). Primary endpoints were total score, auditory comprehension, and expressive communication on the Preschool Language Scale, 5th edition. There were several secondary speech, hearing, and language outcome measures. Assessments occurred at baseline and at follow-up after 6 months of LSL therapy. Results: Propensity scores were used to create two matched groups. At baseline, groups did not differ on PLS-5 scores. Change from baseline to F/U on age-equivalents for all three scores was nearly identical for both groups, although the telehealth group was younger, on average, than the in-person group. Discussion: Telehealth was noninferior to in-person services for all primary endpoints. For secondary outcomes, neither group demonstrated a significant advantage. Magnitudes of estimated group differences were small, suggesting nonsignificant differences not predominantly because of sample size. The telehealth group showed greater improvement on 15/24 of secondary language outcome measures. The findings provide evidence that telehealth is equivalent to in-person care for providing LSL therapy to young children with cochlear implants and hearing aids.

Objective: To compare telemedicine versus office visit use at two Medicaid-focused pediatric primary care clinics. Methods: Retrospective cohort study from March 15, 2020 - March 15, 2021 at two Medicaid-focused pediatric primary care clinics. Site A and Site B care for different populations (Site B care for mostly immigrant families with preferred language Spanish). Outcomes included the percent of visits conducted through telemedicine and reason for visit. Descriptive statistics, univariable and multivariable mixed multilevel logistic regression, were used to assess relationship between patient demographics and telemedicine use. Results: Out of 17,142 total visits, 13% of encounters at Site A (n = 987) and 25% of encounters at Site B (n = 2,421) were conducted using telemedicine. Around 13.8% of well-child care (n = 1,515/10,997), 36.2% of mental health care (n = 572/1,581), and 25.0% of acute care/follow-up (n = 1,893/7,562) were telemedicine visits. After adjustment for covariates, there was no difference in odds of a patient having any telemedicine use by preferred language, sex, or payor. Patients 1-4 years of age had the lowest odds of telemedicine use. At Site A, patients who identified as Non-Hispanic Black (odds ratio [OR] = 0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.24-0.45), Hispanic/Latinx (OR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.24-0.66), or other race/ethnicity (OR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.23-0.55) had lower odds of telemedicine use in comparison to Non-Hispanic White. Conclusions: Telemedicine was successfully accessed by Medicaid enrollees for different types of pediatric primary care. There was no difference in telemedicine use by preferred language and payor. However, differences existed by age at both sites and by race/ethnicity at one site. Future research should explore operational factors that improve telemedicine access for marginalized groups.

Background: Ocular emergencies are commonly evaluated in general emergency departments (ED) where ophthalmologists are rarely available. Nonmydriatic ocular imaging combining color fundus photographs and optical coherence tomography (NMFP-OCT) can help with rapid remote triage by ophthalmologists. We evaluated the rate at which retinal detachments (RDs) can be diagnosed with NMFP-OCT in the ED. Methods: Quality improvement project with prospective collection of data on RD patients who had NMFP-OCT obtained by ED staff over 1 year. Photographs were interpreted remotely by ophthalmologists and all patients underwent an in-person ophthalmologic examination in the ED to confirm the presence of a RD. Results: A total of 63 eyes (58 patients) had a RD, among which 53 (84.1%) had strong suggestion of RD on ocular imaging (34 [54%] were seen on both color and OCT nerve/macula; 11 [17.5%] were seen on color but missed on OCT; 8 [12.7%] were missed on color but seen on OCT). Ten RDs (15.9%) were missed on both color and OCT because of peripheral location of the RD (4, 40%), vitreous hemorrhage (4, 40%), or poor image quality (2, 20%). A total of 40 out of 58 patients were not seen by an eye care provider prior to reaching our ED and 10 had an inappropriate stroke workup for acute vision loss of presumed vascular origin. Conclusion: NMFP-OCT of the posterior pole obtained by ED staff revealed the RD in 84.1% of eyes, allowing for rapid remote triage of patients with visual symptoms and avoiding unnecessary testing when the diagnosis of RD is confirmed.

Background: Telemedicine (TM) usage increased rapidly during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study is part of a larger mixed-methods study comparing TM and in-person visits of older adults with heart failure (HF) and describes patient's TM experiences during the pandemic. Methods: This study employed qualitative design using survey responses and individual interviews. Study eligibility requirements included >55 years old, HF diagnosis, and TM visit between September 1, 2020 and May 31, 2021, at one of two participating health systems in the southern United States. Results: Twenty-two TM recipients completed qualitative interviews, and 91 of 125 online survey respondents answered open-ended questions. Data were gathered, sorted, and revealed five themes. Discussion: Interview respondents identified benefits, e.g., convenience, inclusion, decreased exposure, and problems, e.g., connectivity issues, inadequate equipment, and medical conditions impacting use. Recommendations included allocating sufficient appointment time, tailoring visits, and increasing written communication. This study was part of a larger clinical trial registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04304833.

Introduction: The role of telemedicine should be reassessed in the post-COVID-19 pandemic era. This study aimed to evaluate the perception and satisfaction of medical staff with telemedicine after the COVID-19 pandemic and compare these findings with those during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Between January and February 2023, a questionnaire regarding the utilization, safety, and satisfaction with telemedicine was administered to 200 medical staff members (100 doctors and 100 nurses). Additionally, open-ended questions were included to gather insights on the strengths, weaknesses, and prerequisites of telemedicine. The satisfaction levels of the medical staff were compared with those from a previous study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: The response rate among medical staff was 60.0% (50 doctors and 70 nurses). Concerning patient safety, 83.3% of respondents indicated a risk of worsening symptoms in chronic patients, and 68.3% expressed concerns about emergencies related to patient safety. Eighty-two percent of doctors preferred in-person visits over telemedicine, while 48.6% of nurses reported equal or greater satisfaction with telemedicine (p = 0.003). The reported strengths of telemedicine included the convenience of outpatient clinics (67%), while its primary weakness was the incomplete assessment of patient conditions (73%). The likelihood of partial substitution of telemedicine for in-person visits was significantly higher in the post-COVID-19 pandemic period compared to during the pandemic (71.7% vs. 49.0%, p < 0.001). Conclusion: In the post-COVID-19 pandemic era, telemedicine continues to offer significant benefits in enhancing patient access to medical care. However, medical staff remain concerned about its safety and show lower satisfaction compared to in-person visits. In response to these concerns, an effective telemedicine platform and legal standards, including practical guidelines, should be developed.