Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine最新文献

Background: This study assessed the effect of perineural dexamethasone on block duration, opioid requirement, blood glucose levels, and stress response to surgery as measured by the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), following pediatric foot and ankle surgery.

Methods: In this parallel, double-blinded randomized controlled trial, 90 children (ages 2-5 years, >5 kg) scheduled for foot or ankle surgery under spinal anesthesia with ultrasound-guided single-shot popliteal sciatic nerve block were randomized into 3 groups: 0.5% ropivacaine with saline (control), 0.5% ropivacaine plus dexamethasone 0.1 mg/kg (DEX0.1), and 0.5% ropivacaine plus dexamethasone 0.05 mg/kg (DEX0.05). Primary outcome was the time to first rescue opioid analgesia. Secondary outcomes included motor block duration, pain scores, NLR, PLR, and blood glucose levels.

Results: Time to first rescue opioid analgesia was significantly longer in the DEX0.1 group compared with the DEX0.05 group (18.4 hours, SD 2.6 hours vs 16 hours, SD 2.8 hours), with a mean difference of 2.2 hours (95% CI 0.7 to 3.6), p<0.01; and the control group (8.5 hours, SD 1.5 hours), with a mean difference of -9.9 (95% CI -11.4 to -8.4), p<0.001. Motor block was significantly longer in the DEX0.1 group (17.3 hours, SD 2.5 hours) compared with the DEX0.05 (15.2 hours, SD 2.7 hours; p<0.01) and control groups (7.8±1.1, p<0.001). Total opioid consumption was significantly lower in the DEX0.1 group compared with the control group (p=0.01). NLR, PLR, and glucose levels did not differ significantly between the groups at baseline, 24 hours, and 48 hours post surgery.

Conclusions: Perineural dexamethasone significantly prolonged postoperative motor block duration and did not influence blood glucose, NLR, or PLR levels.

Trial registration number: NCT06086418.

Background: Continuous spinal anesthesia (CSA) offers precise, prolonged neuraxial anesthesia suitable for high-risk patients. This technique minimizes hemodynamic instability but comes with notable challenges. Vigilant catheter management is crucial to avoid complications, including the risk of catheter retention. We report a case where the mechanical properties of a spinal catheter led to diagnostic uncertainty.

Case: An ASA4 patient underwent a revision of total knee replacement surgery under CSA using a Pajunk IntraLong catheter set. Following successful insertion, the surgery proceeded uneventfully. During catheter removal, the expected tip markings were absent, raising concern for a retained fragment. Imaging confirmed no retained foreign body. To investigate further, stretching of a new catheter replicated the disappearance of tip markings. This finding suggested that the catheter's material had the potential to stretch under tension, leading to fading of the markings and mimicking a retained fragment.

Conclusions: This case underscores the need for awareness of the mechanical properties of spinal catheters, especially their potential for stretching and loss of tip markings. Understanding these characteristics can prevent unnecessary imaging and reduce patient and clinician anxiety.

Introduction: Many physicians administer steroids after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) to mitigate postprocedural inflammation and decrease postprocedural pain. However, robust evidence supporting the benefits of steroids after RFA is lacking and steroids have risks.

Methods: This study was a single-center, prospective, observational study designed to assess whether RFA alone is inferior to RFA with steroids for postprocedure pain. Eligible patients were at least 18 years of age and scheduled to undergo cervical or lumbar RFA. The primary outcome measure was the average pain score on the numeric rating scale (NRS) 7 days after the RFA. The secondary outcome measures included anxiety, depression and physical function, measured via the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System short forms. All outcome measures were completed prior to the procedure and at 7 and 60 days postprocedure.

Results: Out of the 365 participants who completed baseline assessments, 175 received steroids and 190 did not receive steroids. The pain intensity at 7 days postprocedure was similar between the steroid and non-steroid groups (mean difference (steroid-non-steroid): -0.23). The 95% CI of the estimate (-0.76 to 0.30) was within the prespecified non-inferiority margin of 1.5 NRS points. Similar results were obtained for pain at 60 days (mean difference: 0.09; 95% CI -0.48 to 0.65). No significant differences between groups were observed for anxiety, depression or physical function at either 7 or 60 days.

Conclusion: This study suggests that the addition of steroids to the RFA procedure does not provide added benefits and is therefore not worth the additional risks that they pose.

Background: Up to 30% of patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) have evidence of sensitization, with a similar proportion experiencing severe pain during procedures. Most patients with KOA are elderly and often develop side effects from intravenous sedation. Our study investigated the effectiveness of a methoxyflurane inhaler combined with local anesthesia in reducing procedural pain from genicular nerve block compared with local anesthesia alone.

Methods: 42 adults with refractory KOA were randomized into two groups. Methoxyflurane group received a self-titrated methoxyflurane inhaler with local anesthesia whereas lidocaine group received local anesthesia only. The primary outcome was pain score on a 0-10 verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS) during the procedure. Secondary outcomes included changes in VNRS and behavioral pain scale (critical care pain observational tool) during the procedure, hemodynamic changes, anxiety level, sedation score, and adverse events.

Results: 42 patients with a mean age of 66±12 years participated in this study. There were no significant baseline differences. During the procedure, the methoxyflurane group experienced a significantly greater VNRS pain reduction from baseline (2 (1, 4) vs -1 (-2, 0); p<0.01) and greater VNRS reduction over time (p=0.01) compared with the lidocaine group, with a higher sedation score (p<0.01). Immediately postprocedure, anxiety levels were lower in the methoxyflurane group compared with the lidocaine group (median State-Trait Anxiety Inventory score 21 (IQR 20, 24) vs 27 (23, 29); p=0.02), but the median reduction in anxiety level was not significant (6 (1, 12) vs 5 (0, 14); p=0.61). There were no differences in behavioral pain scores, hemodynamic parameters, recovery or discharge times, and adverse effects between the two groups.

Conclusion: A methoxyflurane inhaler combined with local anesthesia provided better procedural pain control than local anesthesia alone with no observable differences in adverse effects. Future studies evaluating the impact of a methoxyflurane inhaler on different types of painful procedures are warranted.

Background and objectives: Few cadaveric studies have evaluated the dye spread with superficial parasternal intercostal plane (SPIP) blocks. In this study, we examined the dye spread of an ultrasound-guided SPIP block in a human cadaveric model with single and double injection techniques.

Methods: Seven single and four double ultrasound-guided SPIP blocks were performed in seven unembalmed human cadavers using an in-plane approach with the transducer oriented parasagitally 1 cm lateral to the sternum. For the single SPIP, 20 mL of 0.166% methylene blue was injected in the second or third intercostal space into the plane between the Pec major muscle and internal intercostal muscles. For the double SPIP, 10 mL of 0.166% methylene blue was injected in the SPIP at one intercostal space with an additional 10 mL injected in the SPIP two intercostal spaces caudally. The extent of dye spread was documented.

Results: For all SPIP injections, there was consistent mediolateral spread from the sternum to the mid-clavicular line, with many extending laterally to the anterior axillary line. There was craniocaudal spread to a median of 2 intercostal muscles with a single SPIP and 3 intercostal muscles with a double SPIP. There was a median spread to 1 intercostal nerve for the single SPIP and 1.5 intercostal nerves with the double SPIP.

Conclusions: The SPIP block demonstrated limited spread in this cadaver study. A single injection of this block may be of limited value and multiple SPIP injections may be needed to have adequate spread for anterior thoracic procedures.