Rehabilitation最新文献

Background: In Germany, medical rehabilitation usually requires an application of the persons in need. Therefore, these persons have to understand what rehabilitation is and in what case they need this type of health care service. In addition to people with health problems, their close persons (e. g. family members) should also have rehabilitation-related knowledge. Since there is only limited data on the perspective towards medical rehabilitation services, a survey was conducted.

Method: In September 2020, we invited 2,401 registered participants (age: 18-79 years) of a population-based online panel study to participate in an online survey. The cross-sectional survey asked about the understanding of need, subjective information as well as attitudes and expectations towards medical rehabilitation services. We analysed the data descriptively, taking into account the participants' rehabilitation experience and health impairment. In a subgroup analysis, the potential factors influencing the subjective need for rehabilitation were tested using logistic regression.

Results: Data from 1,464 persons (Ø age: 52.5±14.5 years; 55% non-male) were analysed, 44% of the participants considered themselves to be "rather well" or "very well" informed about medical rehabilitation. The majority associated a need for rehabilitation with the access requirements related to service providers. In case of an emerging need for rehabilitation, family doctors would be the first point of contact. The participants mainly had function-oriented expectations of rehabilitation services and a majority prefer inpatient rehabilitation if necessary. Among 383 persons with long lasting and pronounced health-related impairment, the concrete individual need for rehabilitation was associated by a higher subjective degree of impairment as well as their own previous rehabilitation experience and rehabilitation experience in their personal social environment.

Conclusion: Despite an overall good understanding of the need for rehabilitation, different rehabilitation views were found in certain population groups. In order to improve the general understanding of rehabilitation in the public and particularly in close persons, adequate dissemination of low-threshold, population-based rehabilitation information is recommended.

Purpose: Besides the quality of life, patients' return to work is one of the most important treatment results of medical rehabilitation paid by the German Pension Insurance. In order to be able to use the return to work as a quality indicator for medical rehabilitation, a risk adjustment strategy for pre-existing characteristics of patients, rehabilitation departments and labour markets had to be developed.

Methods: Multiple regression analyses and cross validation were used to develop a risk adjustment strategy, which mathematically compensates the influence of confounders and thus allows for appropriate comparisons between rehabilitation departments regarding patients' return to work after medical rehabilitation. Under the inclusion of experts, the number of employment days in the first and second year after medical rehabilitation were chosen as an appropriate operationalization of return to work. Methodological challenges in the development of the risk adjustment strategy were the identification of a suitable regression method for the distribution of the dependent variable, modelling the multilevel structure of the data appropriately and selecting relevant confounders for return to work. A user-friendly way of communicating the results was developed.

Results: The fractional logit regression was chosen as an appropriate regression method to model the U-shaped distribution of the employment days. Low intraclass correlations indicate that the multilevel structure of the data (cross-classified labour market regions and rehabilitation departments) is statistically negligible. Potential confounding factors were theoretically preselected (medical experts were involved for medical parameters) and tested for their prognostic relevance in each indication area using backwards selection. Cross validations proved the risk adjustment strategy to be stable. Adjustment results were displayed in a user-friendly report, including the users' perspective (focus groups and interviews).

Conclusions: The developed risk adjustment strategy allows for adequate comparisons between rehabilitation departments and thus enables a quality assessment of treatment results. Methodological challenges, decisions and limitations are discussed in details throughout this paper.