Rehabilitation最新文献

Background: In Germany, medical rehabilitation usually requires an application of the persons in need. Therefore, these persons have to understand what rehabilitation is and in what case they need this type of health care service. In addition to people with health problems, their close persons (e. g. family members) should also have rehabilitation-related knowledge. Since there is only limited data on the perspective towards medical rehabilitation services, a survey was conducted.

Method: In September 2020, we invited 2,401 registered participants (age: 18-79 years) of a population-based online panel study to participate in an online survey. The cross-sectional survey asked about the understanding of need, subjective information as well as attitudes and expectations towards medical rehabilitation services. We analysed the data descriptively, taking into account the participants' rehabilitation experience and health impairment. In a subgroup analysis, the potential factors influencing the subjective need for rehabilitation were tested using logistic regression.

Results: Data from 1,464 persons (Ø age: 52.5±14.5 years; 55% non-male) were analysed, 44% of the participants considered themselves to be "rather well" or "very well" informed about medical rehabilitation. The majority associated a need for rehabilitation with the access requirements related to service providers. In case of an emerging need for rehabilitation, family doctors would be the first point of contact. The participants mainly had function-oriented expectations of rehabilitation services and a majority prefer inpatient rehabilitation if necessary. Among 383 persons with long lasting and pronounced health-related impairment, the concrete individual need for rehabilitation was associated by a higher subjective degree of impairment as well as their own previous rehabilitation experience and rehabilitation experience in their personal social environment.

Conclusion: Despite an overall good understanding of the need for rehabilitation, different rehabilitation views were found in certain population groups. In order to improve the general understanding of rehabilitation in the public and particularly in close persons, adequate dissemination of low-threshold, population-based rehabilitation information is recommended.

Purpose: Besides the quality of life, patients' return to work is one of the most important treatment results of medical rehabilitation paid by the German Pension Insurance. In order to be able to use the return to work as a quality indicator for medical rehabilitation, a risk adjustment strategy for pre-existing characteristics of patients, rehabilitation departments and labour markets had to be developed.

Methods: Multiple regression analyses and cross validation were used to develop a risk adjustment strategy, which mathematically compensates the influence of confounders and thus allows for appropriate comparisons between rehabilitation departments regarding patients' return to work after medical rehabilitation. Under the inclusion of experts, the number of employment days in the first and second year after medical rehabilitation were chosen as an appropriate operationalization of return to work. Methodological challenges in the development of the risk adjustment strategy were the identification of a suitable regression method for the distribution of the dependent variable, modelling the multilevel structure of the data appropriately and selecting relevant confounders for return to work. A user-friendly way of communicating the results was developed.

Results: The fractional logit regression was chosen as an appropriate regression method to model the U-shaped distribution of the employment days. Low intraclass correlations indicate that the multilevel structure of the data (cross-classified labour market regions and rehabilitation departments) is statistically negligible. Potential confounding factors were theoretically preselected (medical experts were involved for medical parameters) and tested for their prognostic relevance in each indication area using backwards selection. Cross validations proved the risk adjustment strategy to be stable. Adjustment results were displayed in a user-friendly report, including the users' perspective (focus groups and interviews).

Conclusions: The developed risk adjustment strategy allows for adequate comparisons between rehabilitation departments and thus enables a quality assessment of treatment results. Methodological challenges, decisions and limitations are discussed in details throughout this paper.

Reduced exercise capacity, skeletal muscle dysfunction, and a physically inactive lifestyle are linked with symptoms of fatigue and dyspnea in people suffering from chronic lung disease. Numerous such extrapulmonary manifestations have been identified as treatable aspects of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). PR is an extensive personalized non-pharmaceutical intervention, encompassing, but not limited to, exercise training, respiratory therapy, and education. The content and goals of a PR-program are based on a comprehensive patient assessment at the time of rehabilitation admission, with personalized therapies provided by a multidisciplinary team of healthcare professionals. This article provides an overview of PR including possible indications, therapy contents (e. g. exercise training, respiratory therapy), and evidence (COPD, interstitial lung disease, COVID-19). Finally, options for pulmonary rehabilitation maintenance services in Germany are presented.

Objectives: In addition to an existing external assessment tool for the ICF-based assessment of the impairment of rehabilitation patients due to environmental and personal contextual factors, a self-assessment tool was developed and used for rehabilitation patients in a psychosomatic rehabilitation clinic. The aim was to compare the assessment of the impairment by contextual factors rated by the external assessment and by the rehabilitation patients on the other hand. Furthermore, the aim of the study was to obtain initial indications of the applicability of the newly designed self-evaluation instrument.

Method: A sample of N=103 rehabilitation patients was examined via both the external and the self-evaluation tools. A comparative evaluation of the assessment of the external assessor and the rehabilitants' assessments was carried out using measures of assessor agreement (Cohen's Kappa, percentual agreement). The results were set in relation to the data of the routine assessment of the rehabilitation facility (Eta-Coefficient).

Results: The external assessor and the rehabilitants get to different results in their assessment of the extent of impairment by individual contextual factors. For eight of the 15 context factors, there was only a moderate degree of agreement between the assessors (Cohen's Kappa). The percentage of non-agreement between rating of the external assessor and self-assessment lies between approx. 20% and up to approx. 40% of the cases for the majority of the context factors. Whether or not there is an impairment across all contextual factors (overall measure) was answered non-concordantly in just under a third of the cases. Mostly moderate correlations were found between the context factors classified as particularly relevant in the self-evaluation tool and scales of psychometric survey (e. g. BDI-II). This result provides a first indication of the convergent validity of the self-report tool.

Conclusion: More attention should be paid to a supplementary assessment of impairment by contextual factors via the rehabilitation patient's self-assessment in addition to the external assessment. There is a need for further research with regard to the development of the self-assessment tool presented.