Oncologist最新文献

Lessons learned: Intravenous paricalcitol did not improve the efficacy of pembrolizumab, likely related to the short half-life.

Background: Immunotherapy has limited benefit in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer with the tumor microenvironment playing a key role in immune resistance. In preclinical studies, vitamin D receptor (VDR) agonists have been shown to sensitize pancreatic tumors to PD-1 blockade.

Methods: This was a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase II trial to evaluate pembrolizumab with or without paricalcitol as maintenance therapy for patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Participants were ≥18 years; histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic PDAC showing no disease progression after frontline systemic therapy, and achieving maximal cytoreduction (eg, with no further antitumor effect), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status of 0 or 1; adequate organ function. Study treatment included: pembrolizumab 200 mg IV every 3 weeks and either paricalcitol 25 mcg IV 3 times per week or placebo. The primary objective was to evaluate 6-month progression free survival (PFS). Secondary objectives include evaluating the toxicity of the combination and overall survival (OS).

Results: There was no significant difference in 6-month PFS, median PFS, median OS, nor treatment-related AEs between the 2 arms.

Conclusions and relevance: Paricalcitol did not improve the efficacy of pembrolizumab likely related to its short half-life of only 5-7 hours. Microbiome analysis revealed significant difference between long-term (>12 weeks) and short-term (<12 weeks) survival groups across treatment arms. Modulation of the tumor microenvironment will likely require more sustained VDR activity.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, ID: NCT03331562.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement is a well-known driver oncogene detected in approximately 5% of non-small cell lung cancer. However, ALK rearrangement is much less frequent in other solid tumors outside the lungs, such as colorectal cancer (CRC); thus, the optimal management of CRC with ALK rearrangements has yet to be established. In this report, we describe 2 cases of ALK-positive CRC, both of which benefited from ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (ALK-TKI) therapy. Case 1 was a postoperative patient with poorly differentiated colon adenocarcinoma, who was diagnosed with metastatic relapse shortly after surgery. Both fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) and bevacizumab combined with 5-fluorouracil, l-leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) proved ineffective against the disease. The patient was then treated with ensartinib, as the CAD-ALK fusion gene was detected by genomic analysis. The patient was initially treated with ensartinib monotherapy for 9 months, then with ensartinib combined with local radiotherapy and fruquintinib for another 4 months for isolated hilar hepatic lymph node metastasis. The patient experienced disease progression with an acquired ALK G1202R resistance mutation that responded well to lorlatinib. Case 2 involved a 72-year-old man with advanced colon cancer (pT4bN2aM1b, stage IV) harboring an EML4-ALK fusion. The patient underwent resection of the right colon tumor due to intestinal obstruction, but the disease continued to progress after 12 courses of FOLFIRI and bevacizumab chemotherapy. However, the patient responded remarkably well to alectinib. Our report emphasizes the importance of gene detection in the treatment of malignant tumors, and the significance of ALK mutations in CRC.

Cancer is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, with pain experienced by most patients undergoing cancer treatment. Opioids are the recommended treatment for cancer pain management, but recent studies suggest a negative association between opioid use and survival rates among patients undergoing immunotherapy. However, conclusions cannot be drawn regarding causality from these observational data. Immunotherapy, which boosts the body's immune system to fight cancer cells, has emerged as a promising treatment option for all types of cancer. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can activate the anticancer function of exhausted T cells and have shown remarkable survival benefits in patients with multiple malignancies. However, a recent systematic review and meta-analysis suggested that the use of opioids during ICI treatment has an adverse effect on patient prognosis, while the use of NSAIDs is not significantly associated with the prognosis in patients treated with ICIs. These reviews have major limitations due to the retrospective nature of the studies and the multiple factors that can influence the phenomenon. Therefore, caution is required when interpreting results from retrospective data on drug interactions. The findings of this study are alarming and potentially harmful to patients with cancer suffering from pain or other symptoms requiring opioid drugs.

Background: The identification of the most appropriate targeted therapies for advanced cancers is challenging. We performed a molecular profiling of metastatic solid tumors utilizing a comprehensive next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay to determine genomic alterations' type, frequency, actionability, and potential correlations with PD-L1 expression.

Methods: A total of 304 adult patients with heavily pretreated metastatic cancers treated between January 2019 and March 2021 were recruited. The CLIA-/UKAS-accredit Oncofocus assay targeting 505 genes was used on newly obtained or archived biopsies. Chi-square, Kruskal-Wallis, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used where appropriate. Results were significant for P < .05.

Results: A total of 237 tumors (78%) harbored potentially actionable genomic alterations. Tumors were positive for PD-L1 in 68.9% of cases. The median number of mutant genes/tumor was 2.0 (IQR: 1.0-3.0). Only 34.5% were actionable ESCAT Tier I-II with different prevalence according to cancer type. The DNA damage repair (14%), the PI3K/AKT/mTOR (14%), and the RAS/RAF/MAPK (12%) pathways were the most frequently altered. No association was found among PD-L1, ESCAT, age, sex, and tumor mutational status. Overall, 62 patients underwent targeted treatment, with 37.1% obtaining objective responses. The same molecular-driven treatment for different cancer types could be associated with opposite clinical outcomes.

Conclusions: We highlight the clinical value of molecular profiling in metastatic solid tumors using comprehensive NGS-based panels to improve treatment algorithms in situations of uncertainty and facilitate clinical trial recruitment. However, interpreting genomic alterations in a tumor type-specific manner is critical.

Background: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is a malignant tumor that starts from the epithelium of the bile duct and has a poor prognosis. They are characterized by poor response to chemotherapy and lack of effective targeted therapies; thus, therapeutic options are limited.

Case presentation: A 59-year-old man was admitted to the hospital for a workup of abnormal CA19-9 levels. He was diagnosed with ICC, underwent surgery and was found to have pT1bNx disease. He developed rapid disease recurrence on adjuvant gemcitabine + capecitabine. Following recurrence, he received first-line systemic pembrolizumab + lenvatinib and second-line pembrolizumab + lenvatinib + chemotherapy and had mild tumor regression followed by progression. Next-generation sequencing was performed on the baseline surgical sample. This revealed a novel RBPMS-MET fusion, and based on the literature, crizotinib 250 mg twice a day was administered. After 3 months of crizotinib treatment, magnetic resonance imaging revealed a significant reduction in liver lesions, and 4 months after initiating treatment, scans demonstrated a partial response.

Conclusion: Our case report strengthens the evidence that crizotinib may be a viable treatment option for patients with ICC with a c-MET tyrosine kinase fusion, necessitating additional clinical investigation.

We report a case of a long-term surviving patient with EML4/ALK translocated non-small cell adenocarcinoma of the lung in UICC8 stage IVA. During recurrence under continuous crizotinib therapy, a hitherto insufficiently characterized missense mutation in the ALK gene (Arg1181His) was identified through targeted sequencing. The aforementioned EML4/ALK translocation could still be detected in this situation. Employing a 3D reconstruction of the ALK tertiary structure, considering its interaction with various ALK inhibitors at the molecular binding site, our analysis indicated the presence of a mutation associated with crizotinib resistance. To validate the biological relevance of this previously unknown mutation, we carried out an in vitro validation approach in cell culture in addition to the molecular diagnostics accompanied by the molecular tumor board. The tumor scenario was mimicked through retroviral transfection. Our comparative in vitro treatment regimen paired with the clinical trajectory of the patient, corroborated our initial clinical and biochemical suspicions. Our approach demonstrates preclinical, in silico, and clinical evidence of a novel crizotinib resistance mutation in ALK as well as sensitivity toward brigatinib and potentially lorlatinib. In future cases, this procedure represents an important contribution to functional diagnostics in the context of molecular tumor boards.

Background: Patients with breast cancer exhibit heterogeneity in the expression of the human epithelial growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Clinically, re-biopsying recurrent or metastatic lesions presents substantial challenges. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of HER2-targeted PET/CT imaging in identifying HER2 expression in breast cancer lesions and monitoring therapeutic responses.

Patients and methods: This exploratory analysis used data from a prospective study that included adult patients with breast cancer who underwent both Al18F-NOTA-HER2-BCH and 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging at Beijing Cancer Hospital between June 2020 and July 2023 (NCT04547309).

Results: Fifty-nine participants, with a median age of 55 years, were analyzed. Lesions imaged with HER2-targeted PET/CT before anti-HER2 therapy exhibited higher SUVmax values than after therapy in HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) 3 + lesions (19.9, 95% CI: 15.7-25.3 vs 9.8, 95% CI: 5.6-14.7; P = .006). A significant positive correlation was observed between SUVmax on HER2-targeted PET/CT and IHC before therapy (P = .034), with higher SUVmax values noted in lesions with positive HER2 pathology compared to those with negative HER2 status (17.9 ± 13.2 vs 1.1 ± 0.3; P = .007). HER2 expression heterogeneity was confirmed both between primary and metastatic lesions (22.9%) and among different metastatic sites (26.7%) as assessed by HER2-targeted PET/CT. A superior therapeutic response correlated with higher pretreatment SUVmax values. The HER2-targeted PET/CT procedure was well-tolerated by all patients.

Conclusion: HER2-targeted PET/CT imaging offers a practical, non-invasive, and quantitative approach for assessing HER2 status in breast cancer patients, facilitating the optimization and personalization of therapeutic strategies by oncologists.

With the widespread use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for solid tumors, mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition factor (MET) rearrangement/fusion has been confirmed in multiple cancer types. MET amplification and MET exon 14 skipping mutations induce protein autophosphorylation; however, the pathogenic mechanism and drug sensitivity of MET fusion remain unclear. The following report describes the clinical case of a patient diagnosed with squamous lung cancer bearing a TFG-MET gene fusion. In vitro assays demonstrated MET phosphorylation and oncogenic capacity due to the TFG-MET rearrangement, both of which were inhibited by crizotinib treatment. The patient was treated with crizotinib, which resulted in sustained partial remission for more than 17 months. Collectively, cellular analyses and our case report emphasize the potential of MET fusion as a predictive biomarker for personalized target therapy for solid tumors.

Introduction: The emergence of diverse resistance mechanisms after osimertinib therapy, including on-target epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and off-target alterations, warrants investigation of novel therapeutics to overcome these challenges and improve patient outcomes.

Methods: COMPOSIT was a French, retrospective, multicenter, cohort study of the effectiveness and tolerability of osimertinib in combination with other targeted therapies in patients with advanced EGFR-mutant (EGFRm) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who harbored other oncogenic drivers as primary or acquired resistance mechanisms. Real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) were the primary endpoints.

Results: The study included 61 patients (63.9% women; median age, 61 years). Chemotherapy was administered to 26 patients (42.6%) before the combinations. The most frequently targeted resistance mechanisms were MET amplification (n = 40) and BRAF alterations (n = 11). Sixteen combinations of osimertinib with other targeted therapies were reported. Overall (except for 10 patients in clinical trials), median rwPFS and OS were 3.9 (95% CI, 2.9-5.2) and 9.8 months (95% CI, 6.8-14.8). Best ORR (n = 54) was 50% (95% CI, 33.0-72.8). In patients with MET amplification (n = 29), median rwPFS and OS were 4.9 (95% CI, 2.9-7.2) and 8.6 months (95% CI, 5.3-21.6). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 15 patients (24.6%). No deaths were related to treatment.

Conclusions: Combinations of osimertinib with other targeted therapies appeared to be feasible and safe and may offer clinical benefit to overcome resistance to osimertinib in EGFRm NSCLC, especially in patients with MET amplification.

Background: TRK-inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy across several cancers with NTRK fusions. Their activity in cancers with NTRK overexpression remains unclear.

Methods: This trial enrolled patients with advanced cancers harboring NTRK fusions or extreme mRNA overexpression, defined as NTRK1/2/3 expression by RNA profiling >5 SDs for a given cancer type. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), with secondary endpoints including time-to-progression (TTP) ratio [TTP on study to TTP on previous systemic therapy (TTP1)], progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Initially planned for 2 non-comparator groups: primary central nervous system (CNS) and non-CNS tumours with NTRK fusions, the protocol was amended to permit NTRK overexpression.

Results: Seventeen patients were treated with larotrectinib: one glioblastoma with a SPECC1L::NTRK2 fusion (group 1), and a peripheral nerve sheath tumor with a TPM3::NTRK1 fusion and 15 patients with overexpression (group 2). The ORR was 6%. An additional 3 of 12 (25%) TTP1-evaluable patients achieved a TTP ratio ≥1.3 and 2 of 5 without an evaluable TTP1 had a PFS >6 months. Median PFS and OS were 3.5 (95% CI, 1.4-6.0) and 15.9 months (95% CI, 6.4-NR), respectively.

Conclusion: Unlike its efficacy in NTRK-fusion positive cancers, larotrectinib did not demonstrate a signal of efficacy among tumors with NTRK overexpression.