Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-02-24DOI: 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2024.02.005
Emily S Noël
During human embryonic development the early establishment of a functional heart is vital to support the growing fetus. However, forming the embryonic heart is an extremely complex process, requiring spatiotemporally controlled cell specification and differentiation, tissue organization, and coordination of cardiac function. These complexities, in concert with the early and rapid development of the embryonic heart, mean that understanding the intricate interplay between these processes that help shape the early heart remains highly challenging. In this review I focus on recent insights from animal models that have shed new light on the earliest stages of heart development. This includes specification and organization of cardiac progenitors, cell and tissue movements that make and shape the early heart tube, and the initiation of the first beat in the developing heart. In addition I highlight relevant in vitro models that could support translation of findings from animal models to human heart development. Finally I discuss challenges that are being addressed in the field, along with future considerations that together may help move us towards a deeper understanding of how our hearts are made.
{"title":"Cardiac construction-Recent advances in morphological and transcriptional modeling of early heart development.","authors":"Emily S Noël","doi":"10.1016/bs.ctdb.2024.02.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/bs.ctdb.2024.02.005","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During human embryonic development the early establishment of a functional heart is vital to support the growing fetus. However, forming the embryonic heart is an extremely complex process, requiring spatiotemporally controlled cell specification and differentiation, tissue organization, and coordination of cardiac function. These complexities, in concert with the early and rapid development of the embryonic heart, mean that understanding the intricate interplay between these processes that help shape the early heart remains highly challenging. In this review I focus on recent insights from animal models that have shed new light on the earliest stages of heart development. This includes specification and organization of cardiac progenitors, cell and tissue movements that make and shape the early heart tube, and the initiation of the first beat in the developing heart. In addition I highlight relevant in vitro models that could support translation of findings from animal models to human heart development. Finally I discuss challenges that are being addressed in the field, along with future considerations that together may help move us towards a deeper understanding of how our hearts are made.</p>","PeriodicalId":55191,"journal":{"name":"Current Topics in Developmental Biology","volume":"156 ","pages":"121-156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140332337","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-02-16DOI: 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2024.01.014
Philina Santarelli, Valentina Rosti, Maria Vivo, Chiara Lanzuolo
The proper functioning of skeletal muscles is essential throughout life. A crucial crosstalk between the environment and several cellular mechanisms allows striated muscles to perform successfully. Notably, the skeletal muscle tissue reacts to an injury producing a completely functioning tissue. The muscle's robust regenerative capacity relies on the fine coordination between muscle stem cells (MuSCs or "satellite cells") and their specific microenvironment that dictates stem cells' activation, differentiation, and self-renewal. Critical for the muscle stem cell pool is a fine regulation of chromatin organization and gene expression. Acquiring a lineage-specific 3D genome architecture constitutes a crucial modulator of muscle stem cell function during development, in the adult stage, in physiological and pathological conditions. The context-dependent relationship between genome structure, such as accessibility and chromatin compartmentalization, and their functional effects will be analysed considering the improved 3D epigenome knowledge, underlining the intimate liaison between environmental encounters and epigenetics.
{"title":"Chromatin organization of muscle stem cell.","authors":"Philina Santarelli, Valentina Rosti, Maria Vivo, Chiara Lanzuolo","doi":"10.1016/bs.ctdb.2024.01.014","DOIUrl":"10.1016/bs.ctdb.2024.01.014","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The proper functioning of skeletal muscles is essential throughout life. A crucial crosstalk between the environment and several cellular mechanisms allows striated muscles to perform successfully. Notably, the skeletal muscle tissue reacts to an injury producing a completely functioning tissue. The muscle's robust regenerative capacity relies on the fine coordination between muscle stem cells (MuSCs or \"satellite cells\") and their specific microenvironment that dictates stem cells' activation, differentiation, and self-renewal. Critical for the muscle stem cell pool is a fine regulation of chromatin organization and gene expression. Acquiring a lineage-specific 3D genome architecture constitutes a crucial modulator of muscle stem cell function during development, in the adult stage, in physiological and pathological conditions. The context-dependent relationship between genome structure, such as accessibility and chromatin compartmentalization, and their functional effects will be analysed considering the improved 3D epigenome knowledge, underlining the intimate liaison between environmental encounters and epigenetics.</p>","PeriodicalId":55191,"journal":{"name":"Current Topics in Developmental Biology","volume":"158 ","pages":"375-406"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140855612","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-04-08DOI: 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2024.01.013
Ping Hu
Muscle regeneration is a complex process orchestrated by multiple steps. Recent findings indicate that inflammatory responses could play central roles in bridging initial muscle injury responses and timely muscle injury reparation. The various types of immune cells and cytokines have crucial roles in muscle regeneration process. In this review, we provide an overview of the functions of acute inflammation in muscle regeneration.
{"title":"Effects of the immune system on muscle regeneration.","authors":"Ping Hu","doi":"10.1016/bs.ctdb.2024.01.013","DOIUrl":"10.1016/bs.ctdb.2024.01.013","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Muscle regeneration is a complex process orchestrated by multiple steps. Recent findings indicate that inflammatory responses could play central roles in bridging initial muscle injury responses and timely muscle injury reparation. The various types of immune cells and cytokines have crucial roles in muscle regeneration process. In this review, we provide an overview of the functions of acute inflammation in muscle regeneration.</p>","PeriodicalId":55191,"journal":{"name":"Current Topics in Developmental Biology","volume":"158 ","pages":"239-251"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140868979","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-03-19DOI: 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2024.02.013
Holly Jiogo, Colin Crist
Satellite cells, named for their satellite position around the sarcolemma of the myofibre, are responsible for skeletal muscle regeneration. Satellite cells normally reside in a quiescent state, but rapidly activate the myogenic program and the cell cycle in response to injury. Translational control of gene expression has emerged as an important regulator of satellite cell activity. Quiescent satellite cells maintain low levels of protein synthesis and selectively translate specific mRNAs to conserve limited energy. Activated satellite cells rapidly restore global protein synthesis to meet the demands of proliferating myogenic progenitors that participate in muscle repair. We propose a model by which translational control enables rapid protein level changes in response to injury-induced environmental shifts, serving as both a brake mechanism during quiescence and an accelerator for injury response. In this Chapter, we navigate the processing, translation and metabolism of newly transcribed mRNAs. We review the modifications of mRNA that occur during mRNA processing in the nucleus of satellite cells, and illustrate how these modifications impact the translation and stability of mRNAs. In the cytoplasm, we review how pathways work in concert to regulate protein synthesis globally, while trans acting microRNAs and RNA binding proteins modify specific mRNA translation within a context of tightly regulated protein synthesis. While navigating translational control of gene expression in satellite cells, this chapter reveals that despite significant progress, the field remains nascent in the broader scope of translational control in cell biology. We propose that future investigations will benefit from incorporating emerging global analyses to study translational control of gene expression in rare satellite cells, and we pose unanswered questions that warrant future exploration.
{"title":"Navigating translational control of gene expression in satellite cells.","authors":"Holly Jiogo, Colin Crist","doi":"10.1016/bs.ctdb.2024.02.013","DOIUrl":"10.1016/bs.ctdb.2024.02.013","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Satellite cells, named for their satellite position around the sarcolemma of the myofibre, are responsible for skeletal muscle regeneration. Satellite cells normally reside in a quiescent state, but rapidly activate the myogenic program and the cell cycle in response to injury. Translational control of gene expression has emerged as an important regulator of satellite cell activity. Quiescent satellite cells maintain low levels of protein synthesis and selectively translate specific mRNAs to conserve limited energy. Activated satellite cells rapidly restore global protein synthesis to meet the demands of proliferating myogenic progenitors that participate in muscle repair. We propose a model by which translational control enables rapid protein level changes in response to injury-induced environmental shifts, serving as both a brake mechanism during quiescence and an accelerator for injury response. In this Chapter, we navigate the processing, translation and metabolism of newly transcribed mRNAs. We review the modifications of mRNA that occur during mRNA processing in the nucleus of satellite cells, and illustrate how these modifications impact the translation and stability of mRNAs. In the cytoplasm, we review how pathways work in concert to regulate protein synthesis globally, while trans acting microRNAs and RNA binding proteins modify specific mRNA translation within a context of tightly regulated protein synthesis. While navigating translational control of gene expression in satellite cells, this chapter reveals that despite significant progress, the field remains nascent in the broader scope of translational control in cell biology. We propose that future investigations will benefit from incorporating emerging global analyses to study translational control of gene expression in rare satellite cells, and we pose unanswered questions that warrant future exploration.</p>","PeriodicalId":55191,"journal":{"name":"Current Topics in Developmental Biology","volume":"158 ","pages":"253-277"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140872851","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-03-05DOI: 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2024.02.009
Jo Nguyen, Penney M Gilbert
Skeletal muscle is a force-producing organ composed of muscle tissues, connective tissues, blood vessels, and nerves, all working in synergy to enable movement and provide support to the body. While robust biomechanical descriptions of skeletal muscle force production at the body or tissue level exist, little is known about force application on microstructures within the muscles, such as cells. Among various cell types, skeletal muscle stem cells reside in the muscle tissue environment and play a crucial role in driving the self-repair process when muscle damage occurs. Early evidence indicates that the fate and function of skeletal muscle stem cells are controlled by both biophysical and biochemical factors in their microenvironments, but much remains to accomplish in quantitatively describing the biophysical muscle stem cell microenvironment. This book chapter aims to review current knowledge on the influence of biophysical stresses and landscape properties on muscle stem cells in heath, aging, and diseases.
{"title":"Decoding the forces that shape muscle stem cell function.","authors":"Jo Nguyen, Penney M Gilbert","doi":"10.1016/bs.ctdb.2024.02.009","DOIUrl":"10.1016/bs.ctdb.2024.02.009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Skeletal muscle is a force-producing organ composed of muscle tissues, connective tissues, blood vessels, and nerves, all working in synergy to enable movement and provide support to the body. While robust biomechanical descriptions of skeletal muscle force production at the body or tissue level exist, little is known about force application on microstructures within the muscles, such as cells. Among various cell types, skeletal muscle stem cells reside in the muscle tissue environment and play a crucial role in driving the self-repair process when muscle damage occurs. Early evidence indicates that the fate and function of skeletal muscle stem cells are controlled by both biophysical and biochemical factors in their microenvironments, but much remains to accomplish in quantitatively describing the biophysical muscle stem cell microenvironment. This book chapter aims to review current knowledge on the influence of biophysical stresses and landscape properties on muscle stem cells in heath, aging, and diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":55191,"journal":{"name":"Current Topics in Developmental Biology","volume":"158 ","pages":"279-306"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140873808","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-02-12DOI: 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2024.01.015
Brittany M Edens, Marianne E Bronner
The primary senses-touch, taste, sight, smell, and hearing-connect animals with their environments and with one another. Aside from the eyes, the primary sense organs of vertebrates and the peripheral sensory pathways that relay their inputs arise from two transient stem cell populations: the neural crest and the cranial placodes. In this chapter we consider the senses from historical and cultural perspectives, and discuss the senses as biological faculties. We begin with the embryonic origin of the neural crest and cranial placodes from within the neural plate border of the ectodermal germ layer. Then, we describe the major chemical (i.e. olfactory and gustatory) and mechanical (i.e. vestibulo-auditory and somatosensory) senses, with an emphasis on the developmental interactions between neural crest and cranial placodes that shape their structures and functions.
{"title":"Making developmental sense of the senses, their origin and function.","authors":"Brittany M Edens, Marianne E Bronner","doi":"10.1016/bs.ctdb.2024.01.015","DOIUrl":"10.1016/bs.ctdb.2024.01.015","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The primary senses-touch, taste, sight, smell, and hearing-connect animals with their environments and with one another. Aside from the eyes, the primary sense organs of vertebrates and the peripheral sensory pathways that relay their inputs arise from two transient stem cell populations: the neural crest and the cranial placodes. In this chapter we consider the senses from historical and cultural perspectives, and discuss the senses as biological faculties. We begin with the embryonic origin of the neural crest and cranial placodes from within the neural plate border of the ectodermal germ layer. Then, we describe the major chemical (i.e. olfactory and gustatory) and mechanical (i.e. vestibulo-auditory and somatosensory) senses, with an emphasis on the developmental interactions between neural crest and cranial placodes that shape their structures and functions.</p>","PeriodicalId":55191,"journal":{"name":"Current Topics in Developmental Biology","volume":"159 ","pages":"132-167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140905003","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Transcriptional regulation plays a pivotal role in orchestrating the intricate genetic programs governing embryonic development. The expression of developmental genes relies on the combined activity of several cis-regulatory elements (CREs), such as enhancers and silencers, which can be located at long linear distances from the genes that they regulate and that interact with them through establishment of chromatin loops. Mutations affecting their activity or interaction with their target genes can lead to developmental disorders and are thought to have importantly contributed to the evolution of the animal body plan. The income of next-generation-sequencing approaches has allowed identifying over a million of sequences with putative regulatory potential in the human genome. Characterizing their function and establishing gene-CREs maps is essential to decode the logic governing developmental gene expression and is one of the major challenges of the post-genomic era. Chromatin 3D organization plays an essential role in determining how CREs specifically contact their target genes while avoiding deleterious off-target interactions. Our understanding of these aspects has greatly advanced with the income of chromatin conformation capture techniques and fluorescence microscopy approaches to visualize the organization of DNA elements in the nucleus. Here we will summarize relevant aspects of how the interplay between CRE activity and chromatin 3D organization regulates developmental gene expression and how it relates to pathological conditions and the evolution of animal body plan.
转录调控在协调管理胚胎发育的复杂遗传程序中起着关键作用。发育基因的表达依赖于增强子和沉默子等几种顺式调控元件(CREs)的综合活性,这些元件与其调控的基因之间的线性距离很长,并通过建立染色质环路与之相互作用。影响这些基因活性或与其靶基因相互作用的突变可导致发育障碍,并被认为对动物体计划的进化做出了重要贡献。下一代测序方法的收入使得人类基因组中具有潜在调控能力的序列超过一百万个。鉴定它们的功能和建立基因-CREs图谱对于解码发育基因表达的逻辑至关重要,也是后基因组时代的主要挑战之一。染色质三维组织在决定 CREs 如何特异性地接触其靶基因,同时避免有害的脱靶相互作用方面起着至关重要的作用。随着染色质构象捕获技术和荧光显微镜方法的收入,我们对这些方面的理解有了很大的进步,可以直观地看到细胞核中 DNA 元素的组织。在此,我们将总结 CRE 活性与染色质三维组织之间的相互作用如何调控发育基因的表达,以及它与病理条件和动物体计划的进化之间的关系。
{"title":"Shaping gene expression and its evolution by chromatin architecture and enhancer activity.","authors":"Jorge Mañes-García, Raquel Marco-Ferreres, Leonardo Beccari","doi":"10.1016/bs.ctdb.2024.01.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/bs.ctdb.2024.01.001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Transcriptional regulation plays a pivotal role in orchestrating the intricate genetic programs governing embryonic development. The expression of developmental genes relies on the combined activity of several cis-regulatory elements (CREs), such as enhancers and silencers, which can be located at long linear distances from the genes that they regulate and that interact with them through establishment of chromatin loops. Mutations affecting their activity or interaction with their target genes can lead to developmental disorders and are thought to have importantly contributed to the evolution of the animal body plan. The income of next-generation-sequencing approaches has allowed identifying over a million of sequences with putative regulatory potential in the human genome. Characterizing their function and establishing gene-CREs maps is essential to decode the logic governing developmental gene expression and is one of the major challenges of the post-genomic era. Chromatin 3D organization plays an essential role in determining how CREs specifically contact their target genes while avoiding deleterious off-target interactions. Our understanding of these aspects has greatly advanced with the income of chromatin conformation capture techniques and fluorescence microscopy approaches to visualize the organization of DNA elements in the nucleus. Here we will summarize relevant aspects of how the interplay between CRE activity and chromatin 3D organization regulates developmental gene expression and how it relates to pathological conditions and the evolution of animal body plan.</p>","PeriodicalId":55191,"journal":{"name":"Current Topics in Developmental Biology","volume":"159 ","pages":"406-437"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140905032","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-06-04DOI: 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2024.05.003
Samhita P Banavar, Eric W Fowler, Celeste M Nelson
Morphogenesis is a physical process that sculpts the final functional forms of tissues and organs. Remarkably, the lungs of terrestrial vertebrates vary dramatically in form across species, despite providing the same function of transporting oxygen and carbon dioxide. These divergent forms arise from distinct physical processes through which the epithelium of the embryonic lung responds to the mechanical properties of its surrounding mesenchymal microenvironment. Here we compare the physical processes that guide folding of the lung epithelium in mammals, birds, and reptiles, and suggest a conceptual framework that reconciles how conserved molecular signaling generates divergent mechanical forces across these species.
{"title":"Biophysics of morphogenesis in the vertebrate lung.","authors":"Samhita P Banavar, Eric W Fowler, Celeste M Nelson","doi":"10.1016/bs.ctdb.2024.05.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/bs.ctdb.2024.05.003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Morphogenesis is a physical process that sculpts the final functional forms of tissues and organs. Remarkably, the lungs of terrestrial vertebrates vary dramatically in form across species, despite providing the same function of transporting oxygen and carbon dioxide. These divergent forms arise from distinct physical processes through which the epithelium of the embryonic lung responds to the mechanical properties of its surrounding mesenchymal microenvironment. Here we compare the physical processes that guide folding of the lung epithelium in mammals, birds, and reptiles, and suggest a conceptual framework that reconciles how conserved molecular signaling generates divergent mechanical forces across these species.</p>","PeriodicalId":55191,"journal":{"name":"Current Topics in Developmental Biology","volume":"160 ","pages":"65-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141472816","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-02-21DOI: 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2024.02.004
Claudio D Stern
In avian and mammalian embryos the "organizer" property associated with neural induction of competent ectoderm into a neural plate and its subsequent patterning into rostro-caudal domains resides at the tip of the primitive streak before neurulation begins, and before a morphological Hensen's node is discernible. The same region and its later derivatives (like the notochord) also have the ability to "dorsalize" the adjacent mesoderm, for example by converting lateral plate mesoderm into paraxial (pre-somitic) mesoderm. Both neural induction and dorsalization of the mesoderm involve inhibition of BMP, and the former also requires other signals. This review surveys the key experiments done to elucidate the functions of the organizer and the mechanisms of neural induction in amniotes. We conclude that the mechanisms of neural induction in amniotes and anamniotes are likely to be largely the same; apparent differences are likely to be due to differences in experimental approaches dictated by embryo topology and other practical constraints. We also discuss the relationships between "neural induction" assessed by grafts of the organizer and normal neural plate development, as well as how neural induction relates to the generation of neuronal cells from embryonic and other stem cells in vitro.
{"title":"The organizer and neural induction in birds and mammals.","authors":"Claudio D Stern","doi":"10.1016/bs.ctdb.2024.02.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/bs.ctdb.2024.02.004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In avian and mammalian embryos the \"organizer\" property associated with neural induction of competent ectoderm into a neural plate and its subsequent patterning into rostro-caudal domains resides at the tip of the primitive streak before neurulation begins, and before a morphological Hensen's node is discernible. The same region and its later derivatives (like the notochord) also have the ability to \"dorsalize\" the adjacent mesoderm, for example by converting lateral plate mesoderm into paraxial (pre-somitic) mesoderm. Both neural induction and dorsalization of the mesoderm involve inhibition of BMP, and the former also requires other signals. This review surveys the key experiments done to elucidate the functions of the organizer and the mechanisms of neural induction in amniotes. We conclude that the mechanisms of neural induction in amniotes and anamniotes are likely to be largely the same; apparent differences are likely to be due to differences in experimental approaches dictated by embryo topology and other practical constraints. We also discuss the relationships between \"neural induction\" assessed by grafts of the organizer and normal neural plate development, as well as how neural induction relates to the generation of neuronal cells from embryonic and other stem cells in vitro.</p>","PeriodicalId":55191,"journal":{"name":"Current Topics in Developmental Biology","volume":"157 ","pages":"43-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140332346","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2023-12-20DOI: 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2023.12.001
Jonathan Slack
This article is about how the famous organizer experiment has been perceived since it was first published in 1924. The experiment involves the production of a secondary embryo under the influence of a graft of a dorsal lip from an amphibian gastrula to a host embryo. The early experiments of Spemann and his school gave rise to a view that the whole early amphibian embryo was "indifferent" in terms of determination, except for a special region called "the organizer". This was viewed mainly as an agent of neural induction, also having the ability to generate an anteroposterior body pattern. Early biochemical efforts to isolate a factor emitted by the organizer were not successful but culminated in the definition of "neuralizing (N)" and "mesodermalizing (M)" factors present in a wide variety of animal tissues. By the 1950s this view became crystallized as a "two gradient" model involving the N and M factors, which explained the anteroposterior patterning effect. In the 1970s, the phenomenon of mesoderm induction was characterized as a process occurring before the commencement of gastrulation. Reinvestigation of the organizer effect using lineage labels gave rise to a more precise definition of the sequence of events. Since the 1980s, modern research using the tools of molecular biology, combined with microsurgery, has explained most of the processes involved. The organizer graft should now be seen as an experiment which involves multiple interactions: dorsoventral polarization following fertilization, mesoderm induction, the dorsalizing signal responsible for neuralization and dorsoventral patterning of the mesoderm, and additional factors responsible for anteroposterior patterning.
{"title":"The organizer: What it meant, and still means, to developmental biology.","authors":"Jonathan Slack","doi":"10.1016/bs.ctdb.2023.12.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/bs.ctdb.2023.12.001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article is about how the famous organizer experiment has been perceived since it was first published in 1924. The experiment involves the production of a secondary embryo under the influence of a graft of a dorsal lip from an amphibian gastrula to a host embryo. The early experiments of Spemann and his school gave rise to a view that the whole early amphibian embryo was \"indifferent\" in terms of determination, except for a special region called \"the organizer\". This was viewed mainly as an agent of neural induction, also having the ability to generate an anteroposterior body pattern. Early biochemical efforts to isolate a factor emitted by the organizer were not successful but culminated in the definition of \"neuralizing (N)\" and \"mesodermalizing (M)\" factors present in a wide variety of animal tissues. By the 1950s this view became crystallized as a \"two gradient\" model involving the N and M factors, which explained the anteroposterior patterning effect. In the 1970s, the phenomenon of mesoderm induction was characterized as a process occurring before the commencement of gastrulation. Reinvestigation of the organizer effect using lineage labels gave rise to a more precise definition of the sequence of events. Since the 1980s, modern research using the tools of molecular biology, combined with microsurgery, has explained most of the processes involved. The organizer graft should now be seen as an experiment which involves multiple interactions: dorsoventral polarization following fertilization, mesoderm induction, the dorsalizing signal responsible for neuralization and dorsoventral patterning of the mesoderm, and additional factors responsible for anteroposterior patterning.</p>","PeriodicalId":55191,"journal":{"name":"Current Topics in Developmental Biology","volume":"157 ","pages":"1-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140332347","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}