American Journal of Sports Medicine最新文献

Background: Previous studies have revealed that early postoperative rehabilitation of chronic lateral ankle instability is just as crucial as surgical intervention. Immediate weightbearing has yielded good clinical results; however, randomized controlled studies have been limited.

Purpose: To compare the clinical outcomes of patients with immediate weightbearing after lateral ankle ligament repair with those with delayed weightbearing after 2 weeks in a prospective randomized controlled study.

Study design: Randomized controlled clinical trial; Level of evidence, 1.

Methods: Patients who underwent arthroscopic anterior talofibular ligament repair between August 2021 and December 2022 were randomized into 2 groups-immediate weightbearing with a hard ankle brace and nonweightbearing casting for 2 weeks followed by cast removal and weightbearing. Primary outcomes were the ankle function scores as assessed using the visual analog scale at rest and during activities, the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, and the Karlsson Ankle Functional Score (Karlsson score). Secondary outcomes were the time to return to unsupported walking, jogging, work, and exercise and change in the ankle range of motion (ROM) at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups.

Results: A total of 88 participants were included, consisting of 58 men and 30 women, with a mean age of 30.26 years. Computerized randomization resulted in 44 patients per group. These 2 groups displayed no difference in the AOFAS score, Karlsson score, and ankle ROM at all follow-ups. Patients who underwent immediate weightbearing had a significantly shorter time of returning to unsupported walking (P < .001). No differences were observed in the time of returning to work, jogging, and sports exercise.

Conclusion: For patients with chronic ankle instability after arthroscopic anterior talofibular ligament repair, immediate weightbearing allowed patients to return to unsupported walking more quickly and had no negative effects on the AOFAS score, Karlsson score, times of returning to normal life, jogging, sports exercise, and ankle ROM at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups compared with cast fixation.

Registration: ChiCTR2100049612 (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry; https://www.chictr.org.cn/).

Background: Injuries to the glenoid labrum have been recognized as a source of joint pain and discomfort, which may be associated with the inflammatory responses that lead to the deterioration of labral tissue. However, it is unclear whether the torn labrum prompts mast cell (MC) activation, resulting in synovial inflammatory responses that lead to labral tissue degeneration.

Purpose: To determine the potential influence of activated MC on synovial inflammatory responses and subsequent labral tissue degeneration and shoulder function deterioration in a rat model by monitoring MC behavior and sequential inflammatory responses within the synovial tissue and labral tissue after injury, suture repair, and MC stabilizer administration.

Study design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: Anteroinferior glenoid labral tears were generated in the right shoulder of rats (n = 20) and repaired using a tunneled suture technique. Synovial tissue inflammatory responses were modulated in some rats with intraperitoneal administration of an MC stabilizer-cromolyn (n = 10). At weeks 1 and 3, MC activation, synovial inflammatory responses, and labral degeneration were histologically evaluated. Simultaneously, gait analysis was performed before and after surgical repair to assess the worsening of the shoulder function after the injury and treatment.

Results: Resident MC degranulation after labral injury (50.48% ± 8.23% activated at week 1) contributed to the initiation of synovial tissue inflammatory cell recruitment, inflammatory product release, matrix metalloproteinase-13, and subsequent labral tissue extracellular matrix degeneration. The administration of cromolyn, an MC stabilizer, was found to significantly diminish injury-mediated inflammatory responses (inflammatory cell infiltration and subsequent proinflammatory product secretion) and improve shoulder functional recovery.

Conclusion: MC activation is responsible for labral tear-associated synovial inflammation and labral degeneration. The administration of cromolyn can significantly diminish the cascade of inflammatory reactions after labral injury.

Clinical relevance: Our findings support the concept that MC stabilizers may be used as a complementary therapeutic option in the treatment and repair of labral tears.

Background: It is unclear whether the use of concomitant acromioplasty during rotator cuff repair (RCR) improves clinical outcomes and whether the outcomes are affected by acromial type.

Purpose: To perform a systematic review of randomized controlled trials comparing clinical outcomes of RCR with and without acromioplasty, with a subanalysis of outcomes based on acromial type.

Study design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 2.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines by searching PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase to identify randomized controlled trials that directly compared outcomes between RCR with versus without acromioplasty. A subanalysis was performed on the studies that provided outcomes based on acromial type. The search phrase used was rotator cuff repair (acromioplasty OR subacromial decompression) randomized. Patients were evaluated based on retear rate, reoperation rate, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

Results: Application of inclusion criteria yielded 5 studies (2 studies were level 1, and 3 studies were level 2) including a total of 409 patients, with 211 patients undergoing RCR alone (group A) and 198 patients undergoing RCR with acromioplasty (group B). The mean patient age was 58.5 and 58.3 years in groups A and B, respectively. The mean follow-up time was 52.9 months, and the overall percentage of male patients was 54.1%. The rotator cuff tear size was 20.7 mm and 19.8 mm for groups A and B, respectively. No significant differences were found between groups for any of the PROs at final follow-up. Overall retear rates did not significantly differ between groups based on acromial type. Between 2 studies that measured reoperation rate, a significantly higher reoperation rate was found for the nonacromioplasty group (15%) versus the acromioplasty group (4.1%) (P = .031). One of these studies found that 5 of 9 patients (56%) with a type III acromion in the nonacromioplasty group underwent reoperation compared with 0 of 4 patients with a type III acromion in the acromioplasty group.

Conclusion: There is some evidence that acromioplasty during RCR reduces the risk for later reoperation. This may be particularly true for patients with type III acromions, although further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to corroborate these data.

Background: Medial collateral ligament (MCL) reconstruction (MCLR) is performed after failed nonoperative treatment or high-grade MCL injury with associated valgus instability.

Purpose: To evaluate clinical outcomes after MCLR with autograft versus allograft.

Study design: Systematic review, Level of evidence, 4.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The authors conducted a search of the PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases to identify studies comparing outcomes of MCLR with autograft versus allograft. Studies were included if they evaluated clinical outcomes after MCLR using autograft and/or allograft. Any study that included concomitant knee ligament injury other than the anterior cruciate ligament injury was excluded. A quality assessment was performed using the modified Coleman Methodology Score.

Results: The initial search identified 746 studies, 17 of which met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. The studies included 307 patients: 151 (49.2%) patients received autografts, and 156 (50.8%) received allografts. The most used autograft was the semitendinosus tendon (136 grafts; 90.1% of specified allografts), and the only allograft used was the Achilles tendon (110 grafts; 100% of specified autografts). The mean follow-up of the studies was 25.6 months. Postoperative pain (Lysholm scores) ranged from 82.9 to 94.8 in patients receiving autografts and 87.5 to 93 in patients receiving allografts. Postoperative range of motion was full in 8 of 15 (53.3%) patients receiving autografts compared with 82 of 93 (88.2%) patients receiving allografts. Five of the 151 (3.3%) patients who had MCLR with autografts had complications such as infection, instability, and prominent screws. Two of the 156 (1.3%) MCLRs with allografts developed complications of prominent screws and nonhealing incisions.

Conclusion: MCLR with either autografts or allografts leads to improved patient-reported, radiographic, and clinical outcomes. Patient-reported postoperative pain was similar in patients receiving either graft type. Other outcomes were difficult to compare between graft types because of nonstandardized reporting and a lack of pre- and postoperative measurements. Therefore, there is no evidence of significantly improved outcomes in the use of either autograft or allograft with MCLR.

Background: Both high body mass index (BMI) and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) independently influence knee osteoarthritis risk. Preliminary evidence shows the combination of these risk factors leads to poorer recovery and altered biomechanical outcomes after ACLR, but few studies have directly evaluated early changes in cartilage health between normal-BMI and high-BMI groups in this population.

Purpose: To evaluate ultrasound-based measures of cartilage strain and compositional changes (via echo-intensity [EI]) in response to an incline walking stress test between normal-BMI and high-BMI individuals with ACLR. A secondary evaluation was conducted of associations between habitual walking biomechanics (ie, ground-reaction forces, sagittal knee kinetics and kinematics) and cartilage strain and EI outcomes.

Study design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: Gait biomechanics and femoral trochlear ultrasound analyses were evaluated in 64 participants with ACLR who had normal BMI (BMI < 27.0; n = 40) and high BMI (BMI ≥ 27.0; n = 24). Ultrasound images were collected bilaterally before and after an incline treadmill walk, and medial and lateral trochlear strain and EI changes pre-post exercise were used to compare BMI groups and limbs. Gait outcomes included ground-reaction forces, peak sagittal plane knee moments, angles, and excursions and were used to determine associations with cartilage outcomes in the entire cohort.

Results: High-BMI individuals with ACLR exhibited greater medial trochlear cartilage strain in the ACLR limb compared with normal-BMI individuals (approximately 6%; P < .01). In those with high BMI, the ACLR limb exhibited greater medial trochlear strain relative to non-ACLR limbs (approximately 4%; P < .05), but between-limb differences were not observed in the normal-BMI group (P > .05). Medial trochlear EI changes were greater bilaterally in those with high BMI compared with normal-BMI ACLR counterparts (approximately 10%; P < .01). Last, individuals who walked with greater peak knee flexion angles exhibited less medial cartilage strain (ΔR² = 0.06; P = .025).

Conclusion: The data suggested that high BMI affects cartilage functional properties after ACLR, whereas smaller knee flexion angles were associated with larger medial cartilage strain.

Clinical relevance: High-BMI individuals with ACLR may represent a subset of patients exhibiting earlier declines in cartilage functional integrity in response to loading, necessitating additional or more targeted interventions to mitigate disease development.

Background: Revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has been documented to have inferior outcomes compared with primary ACL reconstruction. The reasons why remain unknown.

Purpose: To determine whether surgical factors performed at the time of revision ACL reconstruction can influence a patient's outcome at 6-year follow-up.

Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

Methods: Patients who underwent revision ACL reconstruction were identified and prospectively enrolled between 2006 and 2011. Data collected included baseline patient characteristics, surgical technique and pathology, and a series of validated patient-reported outcome instruments: Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective form, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Marx activity rating score. Patients were followed up for 6 years and asked to complete the identical set of outcome instruments. Regression analysis was used to control for baseline patient characteristics and surgical variables to assess the surgical risk factors for clinical outcomes 6 years after surgery.

Results: A total of 1234 patients were enrolled (716 men, 58%; median age, 26 years), and 6-year follow-up was obtained on 79% of patients (980/1234). Using an interference screw for femoral fixation compared with a cross-pin resulted in significantly better outcomes in 6-year IKDC scores (odds ratio [OR], 2.2; 95% CI, 1.2-3.9; P = .008) and KOOS sports/recreation and quality of life subscale scores (OR range, 2.2-2.7; 95% CI, 1.2-4.8; P < .01). Use of an interference screw compared with a cross-pin resulted in a 2.6 times less likely chance of having a subsequent surgery within 6 years. Use of an interference screw for tibial fixation compared with any combination of tibial fixation techniques resulted in significantly improved scores for IKDC (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.3-2.9; P = .001); KOOS pain, activities of daily living, and sports/recreation subscales (OR range, 1.5-1.6; 95% CI, 1.0-2.4; P < .05); and WOMAC pain and activities of daily living subscales (OR range, 1.5-1.8; 95% CI, 1.0-2.7; P < .05). Use of a transtibial surgical approach compared with an anteromedial portal approach resulted in significantly improved KOOS pain and quality of life subscale scores at 6 years (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.02-2.2; P≤ .04).

Conclusion: There are surgical variables at the time of ACL revision that can modify clinical outcomes at 6 years. Opting for a transtibial surgical approach and choosing an interference screw for femoral and tibial fixation improved patients' odds of having a significantly better 6-year clinical outcome in this cohort.

Background: The Banff Patellofemoral Instability Instrument 2.0 (BPII 2.0) is a disease-specific, quality of life patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) that is valid and reliable in patients with recurrent lateral patellofemoral instability (LPI). Quality of life encompasses the physical, emotional, and psychological aspects of patient functioning and recovery.

Purposes: To concurrently validate the BPII 2.0 to the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-11), the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury Scale (ACL-RSI) in patients presenting with recurrent LPI and to assess baseline values for the PROMs in patients with LPI.

Study design: Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

Methods: A total of 107 consecutive patients with recurrent LPI were assessed between January and October 2021. Patients completed the BPII 2.0, TSK-11, PCS, and ACL-RSI. A Pearson r correlation coefficient was employed to examine relationships between the PROMs. Baseline values, as well as floor and ceiling effects and Cronbach alpha, were assessed for all PROMs.

Results: All 107 patients completed the 4 PROMs. Patients included 28 men (26.2%) and 79 women (73.8%), with a mean (SD) age of 25.7 (9.8) years. The mean (SD) age at first dislocation was 14.8 (6.3) years. The TSK-11, PCS, and ACL-RSI were all statistically significantly correlated with the BPII 2.0 (P < .01; 2-tailed), with moderate correlations (r = -0.361-0.628) The R² values indicated an overlap of the constructs measured by the PROMs.

Conclusion: A statistically significant correlation was evident between the BPII 2.0 and the other PROMs. The BPII 2.0 does not explicitly measure kinesiophobia or pain catastrophizing; however, the significant statistical relationship of the TSK-11 and PCS to the BPII 2.0 suggests that this information is being captured and reflected.

Background: Injuries of the superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL) and anteromedial structures of the knee result in excess valgus rotation and external tibial rotation (ER) as well as tibial translation.

Purpose: To evaluate a flat reconstruction of the sMCL and anteromedial structures in restoring knee kinematics in the combined MCL- and anteromedial-deficient knee.

Study design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: Eight cadaveric knee specimens were tested in a 6 degrees of freedom robotic test setup. Force-controlled clinical laxity tests were performed with 200 N of axial compression in 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion: 8 N·m valgus torque, 5 N·m ER torque, 89 N anterior tibial translation (ATT) force, and an anteromedial drawer test consisting of 89 N ATT force under 5 N·m ER torque. After determining the native knee kinematics, we transected the sMCL, followed by the deep medial collateral ligament (dMCL). Subsequently, a flat reconstruction of the sMCL with anteromedial limb, mimicking the function of the anteromedial corner, was performed. Mixed linear models were used for statistical analysis (P < .05).

Results: Cutting of the sMCL led to statistically significant increases in laxity regarding valgus rotation, ER, and anteromedial translation in all tested flexion angles (P < .05). ATT was significantly increased in all flexion angles but not at 60° after cutting of the sMCL. A combined instability of the sMCL and dMCL led to further increased knee laxity in all tested kinematics and flexion angles (P < .05). After reconstruction, the knee kinematics were not significantly different from those of the native state.

Conclusion: Insufficiency of the sMCL and dMCL led to excess valgus rotation, ER, ATT, and anteromedial tibial translation. A combined flat reconstruction of the sMCL and the anteromedial aspect restored this excess laxity to values not significantly different from those of the native knee.

Clinical relevance: The presented reconstruction might lead to favorable results for patients with MCL and anteromedial injuries with an anteromedial rotatory knee instability.