首页 > 最新文献

American Journal of Sports Medicine最新文献

英文 中文
High Rate of Return to Sport for Athletes Undergoing Articular Cartilage Restoration Procedures for the Knee: A Systematic Review of Contemporary Studies. 接受膝关节关节软骨修复手术的运动员重返运动的高比率:当代研究的系统回顾。
IF 4.5 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-10 DOI: 10.1177/03635465241280975
Kyle N Kunze, Michael Mazzucco, Zach Thomas, Robert Uzzo, Scott A Rodeo, Russell F Warren, Thomas L Wickiewicz, Riley J Williams

Background: Continued advancements in cartilage surgery and an accumulating body of evidence warrants a contemporary synthesis of return to sport (RTS) outcomes to provide updated prognostic data and to better understand treatment response.

Purpose: To perform an updated systematic review of RTS in athletes after knee cartilage restoration surgery.

Study design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods: PubMed, OVID/Medline, and Cochrane databases were queried in October 2023 for studies reporting any RTS outcome after knee cartilage restoration surgery. Meta-analyses with inverse-variance proportion and DerSimonian-Laird random-effects estimators were applied to quantify overall RTS. Comparative proportional subgroup meta-analyses with relative odds ratios (ORs) were constructed to quantify (1) the influence of the procedure on RTS and (2) RTS ability (lower vs same/greater level of play) based on procedure, competition level, and specific sport.

Results: A total of 52 studies (n = 2387) were included. The overall pooled RTS was 80.3% (95% CI, 73.3%-86.5%). Matrix-assisted chondrocyte implantation (MACI) (OR, 2.15) and osteochondral autograft transplantation system (OATS) (OR, 1.83) demonstrated the highest likelihoods of RTS at the same/greater level, while microfracture (MF) (OR, 0.78) was the only treatment demonstrating a higher likelihood of RTS at a lower level. The fastest mean RTS was observed after OATS (6.6 ± 2.6 months). Professional athletes demonstrated an OR of 1.01 for RTS at the same/greater level, whereas recreational/amateur athletes demonstrated an OR of 1.63; however, all professional athletes underwent MF, and recreational/amateur athletes who underwent MF demonstrated lower likelihoods of RTS (OR, 0.78), indicating a consistent association between MF and low RTS propensity. Basketball players demonstrated the lowest likelihood of RTS at the same/greater level (OR, 1.1), while American football and soccer were associated with high likelihoods of RTS (OR, 3 and 2.4, respectively) across all procedure types.

Conclusion: Cartilage restoration allows for high overall RTS, with OATS and MACI conferring the greatest propensity for RTS, while OATS allowed for the fastest RTS. Undergoing MF was associated with consistently poor RTS ability. This study identified several important associations between the level of RTS and clinically relevant factors when discussing RTS, with recreational/amateur athletes, soccer players, and American football players demonstrating a higher relative propensity to RTS.

背景:软骨手术的持续进步和越来越多的证据证明了对RTS(重返运动)结果的当代综合研究,以提供最新的预后数据并更好地了解治疗反应。目的:对运动员膝关节软骨修复手术后的RTS进行最新的系统回顾。研究设计:系统评价;证据等级,4级。方法:于2023年10月查询PubMed、OVID/Medline和Cochrane数据库,以获取报告膝关节软骨修复手术后RTS结果的研究。meta分析采用反方差比例和dersimonan - laird随机效应估计量来量化总体RTS。构建了相对优势比(ORs)的比较比例亚组荟萃分析,以量化(1)程序对RTS的影响;(2)基于程序、竞争水平和特定运动的RTS能力(较低与相同/更高水平的游戏)。结果:共纳入52项研究(n = 2387)。总合并RTS为80.3% (95% CI, 73.3%-86.5%)。基质辅助软骨细胞植入(MACI) (OR, 2.15)和骨软骨自体移植系统(OATS) (OR, 1.83)在相同或更高水平上显示RTS的可能性最高,而微骨折(MF) (OR, 0.78)是唯一显示RTS在较低水平上可能性较高的治疗方法。ats后平均RTS最快(6.6±2.6个月)。职业运动员在相同或更高水平的RTS上的OR为1.01,而休闲/业余运动员的OR为1.63;然而,所有的职业运动员都经历了MF,而娱乐/业余运动员经历了MF,他们表现出较低的RTS可能性(OR, 0.78),这表明MF和低RTS倾向之间存在一致的关联。篮球运动员在相同或更高水平上表现出最低的RTS可能性(OR, 1.1),而美式足球和足球运动员在所有程序类型中表现出较高的RTS可能性(OR分别为3和2.4)。结论:软骨修复允许高整体RTS,其中燕麦和MACI赋予最大的RTS倾向,而燕麦允许最快的RTS。接受MF与持续较差的RTS能力相关。在讨论RTS时,该研究确定了RTS水平与临床相关因素之间的几个重要关联,休闲/业余运动员、足球运动员和美式足球运动员表现出更高的RTS相对倾向。
{"title":"High Rate of Return to Sport for Athletes Undergoing Articular Cartilage Restoration Procedures for the Knee: A Systematic Review of Contemporary Studies.","authors":"Kyle N Kunze, Michael Mazzucco, Zach Thomas, Robert Uzzo, Scott A Rodeo, Russell F Warren, Thomas L Wickiewicz, Riley J Williams","doi":"10.1177/03635465241280975","DOIUrl":"10.1177/03635465241280975","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Continued advancements in cartilage surgery and an accumulating body of evidence warrants a contemporary synthesis of return to sport (RTS) outcomes to provide updated prognostic data and to better understand treatment response.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To perform an updated systematic review of RTS in athletes after knee cartilage restoration surgery.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, OVID/Medline, and Cochrane databases were queried in October 2023 for studies reporting any RTS outcome after knee cartilage restoration surgery. Meta-analyses with inverse-variance proportion and DerSimonian-Laird random-effects estimators were applied to quantify overall RTS. Comparative proportional subgroup meta-analyses with relative odds ratios (ORs) were constructed to quantify (1) the influence of the procedure on RTS and (2) RTS ability (lower vs same/greater level of play) based on procedure, competition level, and specific sport.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 52 studies (n = 2387) were included. The overall pooled RTS was 80.3% (95% CI, 73.3%-86.5%). Matrix-assisted chondrocyte implantation (MACI) (OR, 2.15) and osteochondral autograft transplantation system (OATS) (OR, 1.83) demonstrated the highest likelihoods of RTS at the same/greater level, while microfracture (MF) (OR, 0.78) was the only treatment demonstrating a higher likelihood of RTS at a lower level. The fastest mean RTS was observed after OATS (6.6 ± 2.6 months). Professional athletes demonstrated an OR of 1.01 for RTS at the same/greater level, whereas recreational/amateur athletes demonstrated an OR of 1.63; however, all professional athletes underwent MF, and recreational/amateur athletes who underwent MF demonstrated lower likelihoods of RTS (OR, 0.78), indicating a consistent association between MF and low RTS propensity. Basketball players demonstrated the lowest likelihood of RTS at the same/greater level (OR, 1.1), while American football and soccer were associated with high likelihoods of RTS (OR, 3 and 2.4, respectively) across all procedure types.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cartilage restoration allows for high overall RTS, with OATS and MACI conferring the greatest propensity for RTS, while OATS allowed for the fastest RTS. Undergoing MF was associated with consistently poor RTS ability. This study identified several important associations between the level of RTS and clinically relevant factors when discussing RTS, with recreational/amateur athletes, soccer players, and American football players demonstrating a higher relative propensity to RTS.</p>","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2471-2482"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142958674","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Platelet Concentration Explains Variability in Outcomes of Platelet-Rich Plasma for Lateral Epicondylitis: A High Dose Is Critical for a Positive Response: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis With Meta-regression. 血小板浓度解释了富血小板血浆治疗外上髁炎结果的变异性:高剂量对阳性反应至关重要:一项系统评价和荟萃回归分析。
IF 4.5 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-27 DOI: 10.1177/03635465241303716
Jacob F Oeding, Nathan H Varady, Caden J Messer, Joshua S Dines, Riley J Williams, Scott A Rodeo

Background: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for the management of lateral epicondylitis (LE) have been characterized by substantial variability in reported outcomes. The source of this heterogeneity is uncertain.

Purpose: To determine the effect of estimated platelet concentration on the efficacy of PRP for the management of LE.

Study design: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 2.

Methods: All RCTs evaluating the efficacy of PRP in managing LE were identified. RCTs were classified according to whether the study documented a platelet concentration factor of PRP representing a greater than 3-fold increase over whole blood or a supraphysiological platelet dose (high-dose vs low-dose PRP). The primary outcome was the mean difference (MD) in the visual analog scale (VAS) score at latest follow-up. Random-effects and mixed-effects meta-analyses were performed, and meta-regression was used to evaluate whether differences in outcomes after treatment with PRP could be explained by differences in the concentration of PRP used.

Results: Overall, 13 RCTs with a total of 791 patients were included in this analysis, with 5 that utilized low-dose PRP and 8 that used high-dose PRP. Meta-analysis of VAS scores reported by studies that used high-dose PRP resulted in an MD of -1.31 (95% CI, -1.87 to -0.75) in favor of PRP over all alternative treatment strategies (P < .001). Meta-analysis of VAS scores reported by studies that used low-dose PRP resulted in an MD of 0.08 (95% CI, -0.51 to 0.68), suggesting no difference in the effect between PRP and all alternative treatment strategies (P = .79). The platelet concentration factor of PRP used in each RCT was found to be strongly predictive of the VAS score at final follow-up in meta-regression (P < .001), with 58.5% of the heterogeneity in the outcomes of PRP between studies explained by the platelet concentration factor alone.

Conclusion: The platelet concentration of PRP may play a significant role in the outcomes of patients with LE. A direct linear relationship was observed between the platelet concentration factor of PRP used and the magnitude of patient-reported symptom relief after the management of LE with PRP. Clinicians should ensure a supraphysiological platelet concentration when preparing PRP for the management of LE.

背景:评估富血小板血浆(PRP)治疗外侧上髁炎(LE)疗效的随机对照试验(rct)的特点是报道的结果存在很大的差异。这种异质性的来源尚不确定。目的:探讨血小板预估浓度对PRP治疗LE疗效的影响。研究设计:系统评价和荟萃分析;证据等级2。方法:对所有评价PRP治疗LE疗效的随机对照试验进行分析。rct根据研究是否记录血小板浓度因子PRP比全血增加3倍以上或血小板超生理剂量(高剂量vs低剂量PRP)进行分类。主要观察指标为最新随访时视觉模拟评分(VAS)的平均差值(MD)。我们进行了随机效应和混合效应荟萃分析,并使用荟萃回归来评估PRP治疗后结果的差异是否可以用PRP浓度的差异来解释。结果:总体而言,本分析纳入了13项随机对照试验,共791例患者,其中5例使用低剂量PRP, 8例使用高剂量PRP。使用高剂量PRP的研究报告的VAS评分的荟萃分析显示,PRP优于所有替代治疗策略的MD为-1.31 (95% CI, -1.87至-0.75)(P < 0.001)。使用低剂量PRP的研究报告的VAS评分的荟萃分析结果显示,MD为0.08 (95% CI, -0.51至0.68),表明PRP与所有替代治疗策略之间的效果没有差异(P = 0.79)。meta回归发现,各RCT中使用的PRP的血小板浓度因子对最终随访时的VAS评分有很强的预测作用(P < 0.001),研究间PRP结果的异质性有58.5%是由血小板浓度因子单独解释的。结论:血小板PRP浓度可能对LE患者预后有重要影响。使用PRP的血小板浓度因子与使用PRP治疗LE后患者报告的症状缓解程度之间存在直接线性关系。临床医生在为LE治疗准备PRP时应确保超生理血小板浓度。
{"title":"Platelet Concentration Explains Variability in Outcomes of Platelet-Rich Plasma for Lateral Epicondylitis: A High Dose Is Critical for a Positive Response: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis With Meta-regression.","authors":"Jacob F Oeding, Nathan H Varady, Caden J Messer, Joshua S Dines, Riley J Williams, Scott A Rodeo","doi":"10.1177/03635465241303716","DOIUrl":"10.1177/03635465241303716","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for the management of lateral epicondylitis (LE) have been characterized by substantial variability in reported outcomes. The source of this heterogeneity is uncertain.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the effect of estimated platelet concentration on the efficacy of PRP for the management of LE.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 2.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All RCTs evaluating the efficacy of PRP in managing LE were identified. RCTs were classified according to whether the study documented a platelet concentration factor of PRP representing a greater than 3-fold increase over whole blood or a supraphysiological platelet dose (high-dose vs low-dose PRP). The primary outcome was the mean difference (MD) in the visual analog scale (VAS) score at latest follow-up. Random-effects and mixed-effects meta-analyses were performed, and meta-regression was used to evaluate whether differences in outcomes after treatment with PRP could be explained by differences in the concentration of PRP used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 13 RCTs with a total of 791 patients were included in this analysis, with 5 that utilized low-dose PRP and 8 that used high-dose PRP. Meta-analysis of VAS scores reported by studies that used high-dose PRP resulted in an MD of -1.31 (95% CI, -1.87 to -0.75) in favor of PRP over all alternative treatment strategies (<i>P</i> < .001). Meta-analysis of VAS scores reported by studies that used low-dose PRP resulted in an MD of 0.08 (95% CI, -0.51 to 0.68), suggesting no difference in the effect between PRP and all alternative treatment strategies (<i>P</i> = .79). The platelet concentration factor of PRP used in each RCT was found to be strongly predictive of the VAS score at final follow-up in meta-regression (<i>P</i> < .001), with 58.5% of the heterogeneity in the outcomes of PRP between studies explained by the platelet concentration factor alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The platelet concentration of PRP may play a significant role in the outcomes of patients with LE. A direct linear relationship was observed between the platelet concentration factor of PRP used and the magnitude of patient-reported symptom relief after the management of LE with PRP. Clinicians should ensure a supraphysiological platelet concentration when preparing PRP for the management of LE.</p>","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2489-2496"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143048897","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Return to Sport and Radiographic Postoperative Outcomes After Grade 3 Turf Toe Surgical Repair. 三级草皮脚趾手术修复后恢复运动和术后放射学结果。
IF 4.2 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-05 DOI: 10.1177/03635465251344313
David Cho, Saanchi Kukadia, Brian Josephson, Jayson Stern, Alan Shamrock, A Holly Johnson, Martin O'Malley, Mark C Drakos

Background: Turf toe is a plantar plate injury of the first metatarsophalangeal joint that commonly occurs in athletes participating in outdoor cutting sports. However, there is a lack of evidence-based consensus on treatment guidelines and surgical outcomes in the current literature.

Purpose/hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to report on postoperative clinical outcomes and return to sport for athletic patients treated for both acute and chronic grade 3 turf toe injuries at the authors' institution. It was hypothesized that patients would have significant improvement in pre- to postoperative clinical outcomes and quickly return to sport after surgical repair.

Study design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods: The records of patients who received plantar plate repair at the first metatarsophalangeal joint between February 2016 to July 2022 by 3 fellowship-trained foot and ankle orthopaedic surgeons were reviewed. Inclusion criteria included athletes of at least high school-level competition who underwent plantar plate repair for a primary diagnosis of turf toe injury. Excluded were patients with histories of ipsilateral forefoot surgeries, rheumatoid arthritis, or gout. In total, 28 patients were identified and screened for inclusion. Patient-reported outcomes via Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores were collected preoperatively and at least 1 year postoperatively for all patients. Return-to-sport data were collected via telephone call. Bilateral preoperative and postoperative radiographs were analyzed to measure preoperative and postoperative sesamoid diastasis.

Results: The improvement in pre- to postoperative PROMIS scores was found to be significant for Physical Function, Pain Interference, Pain Intensity, and Global Physical Health. A total of 21 return-to-sport surveys were completed from the patient cohort. Nineteen of 21 (90.5%) of patients were able to return to preinjury levels of physical competition. The mean time to return to sport was 20.4 weeks (range, 12-32 weeks). Both medial and lateral sesamoids demonstrated a significant pre- to postoperative improvement in sesamoid diastasis. No difference in outcomes was observed between acute and chronic injuries.

Conclusion: Patients who received plantar plate repair for a grade 3 turf toe injury demonstrated significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes and were able to quickly return to sport at a high rate.

背景:草皮趾是一种发生在第一跖趾关节的足底板损伤,常见于参加户外切割运动的运动员。然而,在目前的文献中,缺乏基于证据的治疗指南和手术结果的共识。目的/假设:本研究的目的是报告在作者所在机构治疗急性和慢性3级草皮趾损伤的运动患者的术后临床结果和重返运动。假设患者在术前和术后临床结果有显著改善,并在手术修复后迅速恢复运动。研究设计:病例系列;证据等级,4级。方法:回顾性分析2016年2月至2022年7月3名奖学金培训的足踝骨科医生在第一跖趾关节处进行足底钢板修复的患者记录。纳入标准包括至少高中水平的运动员,接受足底板修复,初步诊断为草皮趾损伤。排除有同侧前足手术史、类风湿关节炎或痛风病史的患者。总共有28名患者被确定并筛选纳入研究。通过患者报告的结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)评分收集所有患者术前和术后至少1年的患者报告的结果。恢复运动的数据是通过电话收集的。分析术前和术后双侧x线片来测量术前和术后的籽膜分离。结果:术前和术后PROMIS评分的改善在身体功能、疼痛干扰、疼痛强度和整体身体健康方面具有显著意义。从患者队列中共完成了21项恢复运动调查。21名患者中有19名(90.5%)能够恢复到损伤前的体育比赛水平。平均恢复运动时间为20.4周(范围12-32周)。内侧和外侧的籽瘤在手术前和术后都有显著的改善。急性和慢性损伤的结果没有差异。结论:接受3级草皮趾损伤的足底钢板修复的患者在患者报告的结果中表现出显著的改善,并且能够以较高的速度快速恢复运动。
{"title":"Return to Sport and Radiographic Postoperative Outcomes After Grade 3 Turf Toe Surgical Repair.","authors":"David Cho, Saanchi Kukadia, Brian Josephson, Jayson Stern, Alan Shamrock, A Holly Johnson, Martin O'Malley, Mark C Drakos","doi":"10.1177/03635465251344313","DOIUrl":"10.1177/03635465251344313","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Turf toe is a plantar plate injury of the first metatarsophalangeal joint that commonly occurs in athletes participating in outdoor cutting sports. However, there is a lack of evidence-based consensus on treatment guidelines and surgical outcomes in the current literature.</p><p><strong>Purpose/hypothesis: </strong>The purpose of this study was to report on postoperative clinical outcomes and return to sport for athletic patients treated for both acute and chronic grade 3 turf toe injuries at the authors' institution. It was hypothesized that patients would have significant improvement in pre- to postoperative clinical outcomes and quickly return to sport after surgical repair.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Case series; Level of evidence, 4.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The records of patients who received plantar plate repair at the first metatarsophalangeal joint between February 2016 to July 2022 by 3 fellowship-trained foot and ankle orthopaedic surgeons were reviewed. Inclusion criteria included athletes of at least high school-level competition who underwent plantar plate repair for a primary diagnosis of turf toe injury. Excluded were patients with histories of ipsilateral forefoot surgeries, rheumatoid arthritis, or gout. In total, 28 patients were identified and screened for inclusion. Patient-reported outcomes via Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores were collected preoperatively and at least 1 year postoperatively for all patients. Return-to-sport data were collected via telephone call. Bilateral preoperative and postoperative radiographs were analyzed to measure preoperative and postoperative sesamoid diastasis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The improvement in pre- to postoperative PROMIS scores was found to be significant for Physical Function, Pain Interference, Pain Intensity, and Global Physical Health. A total of 21 return-to-sport surveys were completed from the patient cohort. Nineteen of 21 (90.5%) of patients were able to return to preinjury levels of physical competition. The mean time to return to sport was 20.4 weeks (range, 12-32 weeks). Both medial and lateral sesamoids demonstrated a significant pre- to postoperative improvement in sesamoid diastasis. No difference in outcomes was observed between acute and chronic injuries.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients who received plantar plate repair for a grade 3 turf toe injury demonstrated significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes and were able to quickly return to sport at a high rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1988-1995"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144236004","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Minimum 10-Year Outcomes of Adolescents Undergoing Contemporary Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. 青少年接受当代髋关节镜手术治疗股髋臼撞击综合征的最低10年预后:倾向评分匹配分析。
IF 4.2 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-12 DOI: 10.1177/03635465251343040
Richard M Danilkowicz, Michael J Vogel, Omair Kazi, Eric J Cotter, Shane J Nho

Background: Prior studies have shown that adolescent patients achieve more favorable outcomes after hip arthroscopic surgery for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) compared to adult patients at short-term and midterm follow-up, but a limited number of studies have compared these groups at a minimum 10-year follow-up.

Purpose: To compare patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores, achievement rates of clinically significant outcomes, and reoperation-free survivorship between adolescent and adult patients after hip arthroscopic surgery for FAIS at a minimum 10-year follow-up.

Study design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on patients who underwent primary contemporary hip arthroscopic surgery for FAIS, including chondrolabral preservation, surgical correction of FAIS, and capsular repair, between January 2012 and November 2013 with a minimum 10-year follow-up. Adolescent patients (aged 10-19 years) were propensity score matched 1:1 to adult patients (aged ≥20 years), controlling for sex, body mass index, Tönnis grade, duration of pain, physical activity status, and back pain. PRO scores were collected preoperatively and at 10-year follow-up, including those for the Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), Hip Outcome Score-Sports Subscale (HOS-SS), modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12), visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and VAS for satisfaction. The cohort-specific minimal clinically important difference, Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) were calculated and compared between groups. Reoperation-free survivorship was compared.

Results: Overall, 50 adolescent patients (mean age, 17.0 ± 1.7 years) were matched to 50 adult patients (mean age, 33.0 ± 9.3 years) with a mean follow-up of 10.4 ± 0.4 years. No differences in preoperative PRO scores were observed. Adolescents achieved greater 10-year HOS-ADL, HOS-SS, mHHS, iHOT-12, VAS pain, and VAS satisfaction scores compared to adults (P < .05 for all). Adolescents showed superior achievement rates of the PASS (98% vs 79%, respectively; P = .015) and SCB (88% vs 67%, respectively; P = .035) for any PRO measure compared with adults. No differences in total hip arthroplasty-free survivorship (100% vs 94%, respectively; P = .083) or revision-free survivorship (90% vs 94%, respectively; P = .473) were found.

Conclusion: Adolescent patients treated with contemporary hip arthroscopic surgery for FAIS, including chondrolabral preservation, surgical correction of FAIS, and capsular repair, showed superior 10-year PRO scores and achievement rates of the PASS and SCB compared to a propensity score-matched group of adult patients, despite comparable short-term and midterm PROs.

背景:先前的研究表明,在短期和中期随访中,青少年患者在接受髋关节镜手术治疗股髋臼撞击综合征(FAIS)后,与成年患者相比,获得了更好的预后,但在至少10年的随访中,对这两组患者进行比较的研究数量有限。目的:在至少10年的随访中,比较青少年和成年FAIS患者在髋关节镜手术后的患者报告的预后(PRO)评分、临床重要预后的完成率和无再手术生存率。研究设计:病例系列;证据等级,4级。方法:回顾性回顾2012年1月至2013年11月期间接受FAIS原发性髋关节镜手术的患者,包括关节软骨保留、FAIS手术矫正和囊膜修复,随访时间至少为10年。青少年患者(10-19岁)与成人患者(≥20岁)倾向评分1:1匹配,控制性别、体重指数、Tönnis等级、疼痛持续时间、身体活动状况和背部疼痛。术前和10年随访时收集PRO评分,包括髋关节结局评分-日常生活活动(HOS-ADL)、髋关节结局评分-运动亚量表(HOS-SS)、改良Harris髋关节评分(mHHS)、国际髋关节结局工具-12 (iHOT-12)、疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)和满意度VAS。计算并比较各组之间的队列特异性最小临床重要差异、患者可接受症状状态(PASS)和实质性临床获益(SCB)。比较无再手术生存率。结果:总体而言,50例青少年患者(平均年龄17.0±1.7岁)与50例成人患者(平均年龄33.0±9.3岁)匹配,平均随访时间10.4±0.4年。术前PRO评分无差异。与成人相比,青少年获得了更高的10年HOS-ADL、HOS-SS、mHHS、iHOT-12、VAS疼痛和VAS满意度评分(均P < 0.05)。青少年的通过率更高(分别为98%和79%);P = 0.015)和SCB(分别为88% vs 67%;P = .035)。无全髋关节置换术的生存率无差异(分别为100% vs 94%;P = 0.083)或无修订生存率(分别为90% vs 94%;P = .473)。结论:与倾向评分匹配的成年患者相比,接受当代髋关节镜手术治疗FAIS的青少年患者,包括软骨唇部保存、FAIS手术矫正和囊膜修复,尽管短期和中期的PROs相当,但其10年PRO评分和PASS和SCB的完成率均优于倾向评分匹配组的成年患者。
{"title":"Minimum 10-Year Outcomes of Adolescents Undergoing Contemporary Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.","authors":"Richard M Danilkowicz, Michael J Vogel, Omair Kazi, Eric J Cotter, Shane J Nho","doi":"10.1177/03635465251343040","DOIUrl":"10.1177/03635465251343040","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prior studies have shown that adolescent patients achieve more favorable outcomes after hip arthroscopic surgery for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) compared to adult patients at short-term and midterm follow-up, but a limited number of studies have compared these groups at a minimum 10-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores, achievement rates of clinically significant outcomes, and reoperation-free survivorship between adolescent and adult patients after hip arthroscopic surgery for FAIS at a minimum 10-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Case series; Level of evidence, 4.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was performed on patients who underwent primary contemporary hip arthroscopic surgery for FAIS, including chondrolabral preservation, surgical correction of FAIS, and capsular repair, between January 2012 and November 2013 with a minimum 10-year follow-up. Adolescent patients (aged 10-19 years) were propensity score matched 1:1 to adult patients (aged ≥20 years), controlling for sex, body mass index, Tönnis grade, duration of pain, physical activity status, and back pain. PRO scores were collected preoperatively and at 10-year follow-up, including those for the Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), Hip Outcome Score-Sports Subscale (HOS-SS), modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12), visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and VAS for satisfaction. The cohort-specific minimal clinically important difference, Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) were calculated and compared between groups. Reoperation-free survivorship was compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 50 adolescent patients (mean age, 17.0 ± 1.7 years) were matched to 50 adult patients (mean age, 33.0 ± 9.3 years) with a mean follow-up of 10.4 ± 0.4 years. No differences in preoperative PRO scores were observed. Adolescents achieved greater 10-year HOS-ADL, HOS-SS, mHHS, iHOT-12, VAS pain, and VAS satisfaction scores compared to adults (<i>P</i> < .05 for all). Adolescents showed superior achievement rates of the PASS (98% vs 79%, respectively; <i>P</i> = .015) and SCB (88% vs 67%, respectively; <i>P</i> = .035) for any PRO measure compared with adults. No differences in total hip arthroplasty-free survivorship (100% vs 94%, respectively; <i>P</i> = .083) or revision-free survivorship (90% vs 94%, respectively; <i>P</i> = .473) were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adolescent patients treated with contemporary hip arthroscopic surgery for FAIS, including chondrolabral preservation, surgical correction of FAIS, and capsular repair, showed superior 10-year PRO scores and achievement rates of the PASS and SCB compared to a propensity score-matched group of adult patients, despite comparable short-term and midterm PROs.</p>","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2198-2207"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144276788","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Prevalence, Size, and Anatomic Location of Cartilage and Osteochondral Lesions in Athletes With an Acute Ligamentous Ankle Injury. 急性踝关节韧带损伤运动员软骨和骨软骨病变的发生率、大小和解剖位置。
IF 4.2 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-12 DOI: 10.1177/03635465251344187
Thomas P A Baltes, Feriel Dalansi, Maryam R Al-Naimi, Marcelo Bordalo, Louis Holtzhausen, Rod Whiteley, Marco Cardinale, Pieter D'Hooghe, Gino M M J Kerkhoffs, Johannes L Tol

Background: In athletes with an acute ligamentous ankle injury, cartilage and osteochondral lesions ([O]CLs) have been reported in 8% using 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Visualization of cartilage injuries improves with the use of higher field strengths.

Purpose: To evaluate the prevalence, size, and anatomic location of (O)CLs in athletes with an acute ligamentous ankle injury using 3-T MRI, as well as to determine the association of (O)CLs with injury of (1) the lateral ankle ligaments and (2) anterior syndesmosis.

Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: For this prospective cohort study, all acute ligamentous ankle injuries in athletes (≥18 years of age) evaluated in the outpatient department of a specialized orthopaedic and sports medicine hospital within 7 days after injury were assed for eligibility. Acute ankle injuries were excluded if 3-T MRI could not be obtained within 10 days after injury or if imaging demonstrated a frank fracture. A musculoskeletal radiologist assessed MRI scans for the presence, location, and size of (O)CLs. Morphology was graded using the modified Berndt and Harty score, Griffith MRI score, and International Cartilage Regeneration & Joint Preservation Society score. In addition, injuries of the lateral ankle ligaments and anterior syndesmosis were graded. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between (O)CLs and injury of the (1) lateral ankle ligaments and (2) anterior syndesmosis.

Results: Between September 2016 and February 2020, 171 acute ankle injuries in 166 athletes were included in this study. The overall prevalence of (O)CLs was 14%. (O)CLs of the talus and tibia were observed in 24 (14%) and 9 (5%) acute ankle injuries, respectively. Of 33 (O)CLs, 28 (85%) were classified as cartilage lesions. Lateral ligament injury was observed in 73% of acute ankle injuries, and anterior syndesmosis injury in 38%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis did not show significantly higher odds of (O)CLs in the presence of anterior syndesmosis injury (OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 0.90-5.16).

Conclusion: In athletes with an acute ligamentous ankle injury, a prevalence for (O)CLs of 14% was established using 3-T MRI. The majority were cartilage lesions. No statistically significant association was established between (O)CLs and lateral ligament or syndesmosis injury was established.

背景:在急性踝关节韧带损伤的运动员中,使用1.5 t磁共振成像(MRI)已报道8%的软骨和骨软骨病变([O]CLs)。软骨损伤的可视化随着高场强的使用而改善。目的:利用3-T MRI评估急性踝关节韧带损伤运动员(O)CLs的患病率、大小和解剖位置,并确定(O)CLs与(1)踝关节外侧韧带损伤和(2)前韧带联合损伤的关系。研究设计:队列研究;证据水平,3。方法:在这项前瞻性队列研究中,所有在受伤后7天内在专业骨科和运动医学医院门诊评估的运动员(≥18岁)急性韧带踝关节损伤均被视为合格。如果损伤后10天内不能获得3-T MRI或影像学显示明显骨折,则排除急性踝关节损伤。肌肉骨骼放射科医生评估MRI扫描的存在、位置和(O)CLs的大小。形态学采用改良的Berndt和Harty评分、Griffith MRI评分和国际软骨再生和关节保存学会评分进行分级。此外,对踝关节外侧韧带和前联合损伤进行分级。采用多变量logistic回归分析来评估(O)CLs与(1)踝关节外侧韧带和(2)前韧带联合损伤之间的关系。结果:2016年9月至2020年2月,166名运动员171例急性踝关节损伤纳入本研究。(O)CLs的总患病率为14%。急性踝关节损伤24例(14%)发生距骨CLs, 9例(5%)发生胫骨CLs。33例CLs中,28例(85%)为软骨病变。急性踝关节损伤中外侧韧带损伤占73%,前韧带联合损伤占38%。多因素logistic回归分析未显示前韧带联合损伤时(O)CLs的发生率显著增加(OR, 2.16;95% ci, 0.90-5.16)。结论:在急性踝关节韧带损伤的运动员中,使用3-T MRI确定(O)CLs的患病率为14%。多数为软骨病变。(O)CLs与外侧韧带或韧带联合损伤之间无统计学意义的关联。
{"title":"The Prevalence, Size, and Anatomic Location of Cartilage and Osteochondral Lesions in Athletes With an Acute Ligamentous Ankle Injury.","authors":"Thomas P A Baltes, Feriel Dalansi, Maryam R Al-Naimi, Marcelo Bordalo, Louis Holtzhausen, Rod Whiteley, Marco Cardinale, Pieter D'Hooghe, Gino M M J Kerkhoffs, Johannes L Tol","doi":"10.1177/03635465251344187","DOIUrl":"10.1177/03635465251344187","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In athletes with an acute ligamentous ankle injury, cartilage and osteochondral lesions ([O]CLs) have been reported in 8% using 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Visualization of cartilage injuries improves with the use of higher field strengths.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the prevalence, size, and anatomic location of (O)CLs in athletes with an acute ligamentous ankle injury using 3-T MRI, as well as to determine the association of (O)CLs with injury of (1) the lateral ankle ligaments and (2) anterior syndesmosis.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this prospective cohort study, all acute ligamentous ankle injuries in athletes (≥18 years of age) evaluated in the outpatient department of a specialized orthopaedic and sports medicine hospital within 7 days after injury were assed for eligibility. Acute ankle injuries were excluded if 3-T MRI could not be obtained within 10 days after injury or if imaging demonstrated a frank fracture. A musculoskeletal radiologist assessed MRI scans for the presence, location, and size of (O)CLs. Morphology was graded using the modified Berndt and Harty score, Griffith MRI score, and International Cartilage Regeneration & Joint Preservation Society score. In addition, injuries of the lateral ankle ligaments and anterior syndesmosis were graded. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between (O)CLs and injury of the (1) lateral ankle ligaments and (2) anterior syndesmosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between September 2016 and February 2020, 171 acute ankle injuries in 166 athletes were included in this study. The overall prevalence of (O)CLs was 14%. (O)CLs of the talus and tibia were observed in 24 (14%) and 9 (5%) acute ankle injuries, respectively. Of 33 (O)CLs, 28 (85%) were classified as cartilage lesions. Lateral ligament injury was observed in 73% of acute ankle injuries, and anterior syndesmosis injury in 38%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis did not show significantly higher odds of (O)CLs in the presence of anterior syndesmosis injury (OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 0.90-5.16).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In athletes with an acute ligamentous ankle injury, a prevalence for (O)CLs of 14% was established using 3-T MRI. The majority were cartilage lesions. No statistically significant association was established between (O)CLs and lateral ligament or syndesmosis injury was established.</p>","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2173-2180"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12235055/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144276791","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Outcomes After Isolated Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction for Recurrent Patellar Instability: Influence of Persistent Postoperative Apprehension and J-Sign. 髌股内侧韧带置换术治疗复发性髌骨不稳的疗效:术后持续恐惧和j征的影响。
IF 4.2 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-06 DOI: 10.1177/03635465251339822
Elizabeth R Dennis, Brittany M Ammerman, Joseph T Nguyen, William A Marmor, Natalie K Pahapill, Bennett E Propp, Simone Gruber, Jacqueline M Brady, Beth E Shubin Stein

Background: Patients with recurrent instability underwent isolated medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction regardless of anatomic risk factors within the confines of strict exclusion criteria. Previous publications from this cohort have been limited in the ability to identify risk factors for failure of isolated MPFL reconstruction when recurrent instability was defined as the only mode of failure, likely because of the small patient numbers who experienced this outcome.

Purpose: To investigate whether persistence of postoperative apprehension and J-sign indicate suboptimal outcomes after isolated MPFL reconstruction and to determine if they may help identify patients who need bony realignment in addition to a soft tissue stabilization.

Study design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4Methods:Patients with recurrent patellar instability were prospectively enrolled from March 2014 to December 2019 and underwent primary, unilateral MPFL reconstruction by the senior author within the confines of strict exclusion criteria. Imaging measurements were obtained at baseline. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected at baseline and annually. Recurrent instability events (patellar dislocations or subluxations), return-to-sport (RTS) rates, presence of postoperative apprehension, and J-sign were collected at 1- and 2-year follow-ups.

Results: A total of 138 knees (72% female; mean age, 20.1 ± 6.1 years) underwent isolated MPFL reconstruction between March 2014 and December 2019. The mean Beighton score was 5.3 ± 3.0, and knee hyperextension beyond 0° was 5.4° ± 2.8°. Of the knees evaluated, 95 (81%) had a preoperative J-sign and 89 (65%) had preoperative knee hyperextension. At 2 years, recurrent instability was reported in 6 knees (5%), postoperative apprehension in 9 knees (8%), and a postoperative J-sign in 44 knees (37%). No patients with postoperative apprehension reported recurrent instability. At 2 years, 89% of patients were able to RTS. Patients with both preoperative knee hyperextension and postoperative apprehension had worse RTS rates compared with patients without either (P = .034). Patients with postoperative J-signs had a significantly worse International Knee Documentation Committee score (P = .022), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical Function Short Form score (P = .011), and Kujala score (P = .035) at the 2-year follow-up. For patients with recurrent instability or postoperative apprehension, the Kujala score was statistically significantly lower at 1 year compared with those without (84.9 vs 91.7; P = .019).

Conclusion: In this prospective study of knees undergoing isolated MPFL reconstruction for recurrent patellofemoral instability, patients with postoperative J-signs showed worse PROMs at 2 years, a higher percentage of patients with preoperative k

背景:在严格的排除标准范围内,不考虑解剖危险因素,复发性不稳定患者接受孤立的髌股内侧韧带(MPFL)重建。当复发性不稳定被定义为唯一的失败模式时,该队列先前的出版物在识别孤立性MPFL重建失败的危险因素方面的能力有限,可能是因为经历过这种结果的患者人数较少。目的:研究术后持续的恐惧和J-sign是否表明孤立性MPFL重建后的结果不理想,并确定它们是否有助于识别需要骨重组和软组织稳定的患者。研究设计:病例系列;方法:2014年3月至2019年12月,前瞻性纳入复发性髌骨不稳患者,并由资深作者在严格的排除标准范围内进行了原发性单侧MPFL重建。基线时进行影像学测量。在基线和每年收集患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)。在1年和2年的随访中收集复发性不稳定事件(髌骨脱位或半脱位)、恢复运动(RTS)率、术后恐惧的存在和j征。结果:共138个膝关节(72%为女性;平均年龄(20.1±6.1岁)在2014年3月至2019年12月期间接受了孤立性MPFL重建。平均Beighton评分为5.3±3.0,膝关节过伸超过0°为5.4°±2.8°。在评估的膝关节中,95例(81%)术前有j征,89例(65%)术前有膝关节过伸。2年后,6个膝关节(5%)出现复发性不稳定,9个膝关节(8%)出现术后恐惧,44个膝关节(37%)出现术后j征。无患者术后忧虑复发不稳定报告。2年后,89%的患者能够进行RTS。术前膝关节过伸和术后恐惧均存在的患者的RTS率较无这两种情况的患者差(P = 0.034)。术后j -体征患者的国际膝关节文献委员会评分(P = 0.022)、膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分(P = 0.011)和Kujala评分(P = 0.035)在2年随访中均明显较差。对于复发性不稳定或术后恐惧的患者,与无复发性不稳定或术后恐惧的患者相比,1年时的Kujala评分有统计学意义显著降低(84.9 vs 91.7;P = .019)。结论:在这项前瞻性研究中,对复发性髌骨不稳的膝关节进行了孤立的MPFL重建,术后j -体征的患者在2年时出现了更严重的PROMs,术前膝关节过伸和术后恐惧的患者没有RTS的比例更高,术后恐惧的患者没有复发性不稳。这些发现支持了进一步研究的必要性,即术后j征和畏畏感是否可能是孤立性强腓骨韧带重建治疗复发性不稳定后亚理想结果的重要标志,这反过来可能有助于确定在其指数手术时可能从伴随的骨重组手术中获益的患者。
{"title":"Outcomes After Isolated Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction for Recurrent Patellar Instability: Influence of Persistent Postoperative Apprehension and J-Sign.","authors":"Elizabeth R Dennis, Brittany M Ammerman, Joseph T Nguyen, William A Marmor, Natalie K Pahapill, Bennett E Propp, Simone Gruber, Jacqueline M Brady, Beth E Shubin Stein","doi":"10.1177/03635465251339822","DOIUrl":"10.1177/03635465251339822","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with recurrent instability underwent isolated medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction regardless of anatomic risk factors within the confines of strict exclusion criteria. Previous publications from this cohort have been limited in the ability to identify risk factors for failure of isolated MPFL reconstruction when recurrent instability was defined as the only mode of failure, likely because of the small patient numbers who experienced this outcome.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate whether persistence of postoperative apprehension and J-sign indicate suboptimal outcomes after isolated MPFL reconstruction and to determine if they may help identify patients who need bony realignment in addition to a soft tissue stabilization.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Case series; Level of evidence, 4Methods:Patients with recurrent patellar instability were prospectively enrolled from March 2014 to December 2019 and underwent primary, unilateral MPFL reconstruction by the senior author within the confines of strict exclusion criteria. Imaging measurements were obtained at baseline. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected at baseline and annually. Recurrent instability events (patellar dislocations or subluxations), return-to-sport (RTS) rates, presence of postoperative apprehension, and J-sign were collected at 1- and 2-year follow-ups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 138 knees (72% female; mean age, 20.1 ± 6.1 years) underwent isolated MPFL reconstruction between March 2014 and December 2019. The mean Beighton score was 5.3 ± 3.0, and knee hyperextension beyond 0° was 5.4° ± 2.8°. Of the knees evaluated, 95 (81%) had a preoperative J-sign and 89 (65%) had preoperative knee hyperextension. At 2 years, recurrent instability was reported in 6 knees (5%), postoperative apprehension in 9 knees (8%), and a postoperative J-sign in 44 knees (37%). No patients with postoperative apprehension reported recurrent instability. At 2 years, 89% of patients were able to RTS. Patients with both preoperative knee hyperextension and postoperative apprehension had worse RTS rates compared with patients without either (<i>P</i> = .034). Patients with postoperative J-signs had a significantly worse International Knee Documentation Committee score (<i>P</i> = .022), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical Function Short Form score (<i>P</i> = .011), and Kujala score (<i>P</i> = .035) at the 2-year follow-up. For patients with recurrent instability or postoperative apprehension, the Kujala score was statistically significantly lower at 1 year compared with those without (84.9 vs 91.7; <i>P</i> = .019).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this prospective study of knees undergoing isolated MPFL reconstruction for recurrent patellofemoral instability, patients with postoperative J-signs showed worse PROMs at 2 years, a higher percentage of patients with preoperative k","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1931-1939"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144236003","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Fall From Grace. 失宠。
IF 4.2 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI: 10.1177/03635465251346089
Timothy E Foster
{"title":"A Fall From Grace.","authors":"Timothy E Foster","doi":"10.1177/03635465251346089","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251346089","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"53 8","pages":"1795-1798"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144531242","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparable Mid- to Long-term Outcomes of Semitendinosus and Semitendinosus/Gracilis Grafts in ACL Reconstruction: Median 8-Year (Range, 5-10 Years) Results From a Randomized Controlled Study. 半腱肌和半腱肌/股薄肌移植重建前交叉韧带的中长期结果比较:一项随机对照研究的中位8年(范围,5-10年)结果
IF 4.2 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-06 DOI: 10.1177/03635465251344106
Ingunn Fleten Mo, Thomas Harlem, Anne Gro Heyn Faleide, Torbjørn Strand, Søren Vindfeld, Eirik Solheim, Per Henrik Randsborg, Eivind Inderhaug

Background: The hamstring tendon autograft used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction commonly entails both the semitendinosus and gracilis (ST/G) tendons for sufficient graft thickness, but they may impair function. To mitigate this, a tendon-sparing ST-only graft has been explored. However, less is known of the mid- to long-term outcomes comparing these configurations.

Purpose/hypothesis: The purpose was to investigate differences between the quadrupled ST tendon graft and the doubled ST/G graft configuration. The primary hypothesis was that there would be no difference in the International Knee Documentation Committee 2000 Subjective Knee Form (IKDC-SF) outcomes between groups. The secondary hypothesis was that there would be no differences in knee flexion strength, KT-1000 arthrometer side-to-side measurements, or need for secondary surgery (including revision) between the 2 techniques.

Study design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

Methods: At baseline, 98 patients were randomized to receive either the quadrupled ST tendon graft or the doubled ST/G graft configuration. Preoperatively and after 2 and median 8 years (range, 5-10 years) postoperatively, the investigators collected results for the IKDC-SF, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Tegner Activity Scale, a sports and activity participation questionnaire, knee laxity (KT-1000 arthrometer) side-to-side measurements, Lachman test, and flexion rotation drawer test. Need for secondary knee surgery was evaluated 5 to 10 years postoperatively.

Results: Seventy-seven patients completed median 8-year follow-up (range, 5-10 years): 38 patients in the ST group and 39 patients in the ST/G group. No statistically significant differences were observed between the ST and ST/G groups in IKDC-SF scores (81.7 vs 82.1; P = .93), knee stability, or revision rates. Both groups demonstrated statistically significant improvements in self-reported function (P < .001) until final follow-up. The overall anterior cruciate ligament revision rate was 10.4%, and no increased risk of graft failure or excessive residual laxity was associated with the ST-only graft.

Conclusion: No statistically significant differences were found between the ST group and the ST/G group in terms self-reported function, knee laxity, or need for secondary surgery at median 8 years (range, 5-10 years) after surgery. The ST-only graft configuration did not increase the risk of graft failure or excessive residual laxity compared with the ST/G graft configuration.

背景:用于前交叉韧带重建的腘绳肌腱自体移植物通常需要半腱肌和股薄肌(ST/G)肌腱,以获得足够的移植物厚度,但它们可能损害功能。为了减轻这种情况,研究人员探索了保留st段肌腱的移植。然而,比较这些配置的中长期结果所知较少。目的/假设:目的是研究四倍ST/G肌腱移植和两倍ST/G肌腱移植配置之间的差异。主要假设是国际膝关节文献委员会2000年主观膝关节形式(IKDC-SF)结果在两组之间没有差异。次要假设是两种技术之间在膝关节屈曲强度、KT-1000关节计侧对侧测量或需要二次手术(包括翻修)方面没有差异。研究设计:随机对照试验;证据等级:1。方法:在基线时,98例患者随机接受四倍ST肌腱移植或两倍ST/G移植配置。术前和术后2年和中位8年(范围5-10年),研究者收集IKDC-SF、膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分、Tegner活动量表、运动和活动参与问卷、膝关节松弛度(KT-1000关节计)侧对侧测量、Lachman测试和屈曲旋转抽屉测试的结果。术后5 - 10年评估二次膝关节手术的必要性。结果:77例患者完成了中位8年随访(范围5-10年):ST组38例,ST/G组39例。ST组和ST/G组的IKDC-SF评分无统计学差异(81.7 vs 82.1;P = 0.93),膝关节稳定性或翻修率。直到最后随访,两组自我报告功能均有统计学显著改善(P < 0.001)。整体前交叉韧带翻修率为10.4%,仅st段移植未增加移植物失败或过度残余松弛的风险。结论:ST组与ST/G组在术后中位8年(范围5-10年)的自我报告功能、膝关节松弛度或二次手术需求方面无统计学差异。与ST/G移植配置相比,仅ST移植配置不会增加移植失败或过度残余松弛的风险。
{"title":"Comparable Mid- to Long-term Outcomes of Semitendinosus and Semitendinosus/Gracilis Grafts in ACL Reconstruction: Median 8-Year (Range, 5-10 Years) Results From a Randomized Controlled Study.","authors":"Ingunn Fleten Mo, Thomas Harlem, Anne Gro Heyn Faleide, Torbjørn Strand, Søren Vindfeld, Eirik Solheim, Per Henrik Randsborg, Eivind Inderhaug","doi":"10.1177/03635465251344106","DOIUrl":"10.1177/03635465251344106","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The hamstring tendon autograft used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction commonly entails both the semitendinosus and gracilis (ST/G) tendons for sufficient graft thickness, but they may impair function. To mitigate this, a tendon-sparing ST-only graft has been explored. However, less is known of the mid- to long-term outcomes comparing these configurations.</p><p><strong>Purpose/hypothesis: </strong>The purpose was to investigate differences between the quadrupled ST tendon graft and the doubled ST/G graft configuration. The primary hypothesis was that there would be no difference in the International Knee Documentation Committee 2000 Subjective Knee Form (IKDC-SF) outcomes between groups. The secondary hypothesis was that there would be no differences in knee flexion strength, KT-1000 arthrometer side-to-side measurements, or need for secondary surgery (including revision) between the 2 techniques.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>At baseline, 98 patients were randomized to receive either the quadrupled ST tendon graft or the doubled ST/G graft configuration. Preoperatively and after 2 and median 8 years (range, 5-10 years) postoperatively, the investigators collected results for the IKDC-SF, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Tegner Activity Scale, a sports and activity participation questionnaire, knee laxity (KT-1000 arthrometer) side-to-side measurements, Lachman test, and flexion rotation drawer test. Need for secondary knee surgery was evaluated 5 to 10 years postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-seven patients completed median 8-year follow-up (range, 5-10 years): 38 patients in the ST group and 39 patients in the ST/G group. No statistically significant differences were observed between the ST and ST/G groups in IKDC-SF scores (81.7 vs 82.1; <i>P</i> = .93), knee stability, or revision rates. Both groups demonstrated statistically significant improvements in self-reported function (<i>P</i> < .001) until final follow-up. The overall anterior cruciate ligament revision rate was 10.4%, and no increased risk of graft failure or excessive residual laxity was associated with the ST-only graft.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No statistically significant differences were found between the ST group and the ST/G group in terms self-reported function, knee laxity, or need for secondary surgery at median 8 years (range, 5-10 years) after surgery. The ST-only graft configuration did not increase the risk of graft failure or excessive residual laxity compared with the ST/G graft configuration.</p>","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2145-2153"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144236002","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Arthroscopy Is at Least as Effective as Arthrotomy for Treatment of Septic Arthritis in Adults: A Systematic Review of Large and Intermediate Joints. 在成人脓毒性关节炎的治疗中,关节镜检查至少和关节切开术一样有效:一项关于大关节和中等关节的系统综述。
IF 4.2 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-11 DOI: 10.1177/03635465241285878
Brandon M Nudelman, Amit S Piple, Richard D Ferkel

Background: Surgical options for septic arthritis include open arthrotomy or an arthroscopic procedure. The optimal surgical technique remains a matter of debate as acceptable results have been reported for both.

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of arthroscopy versus arthrotomy for the treatment of septic arthritis in large and intermediate-sized joints.

Study design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: A literature search was performed of the PubMed and Cochrane online databases through September 2023 identifying articles comparing arthroscopy with arthrotomy for the treatment of septic arthritis. Eligible articles included retrospective or prospective comparative studies investigating reoperation, perioperative complications, or clinical outcomes after arthroscopic or open treatment for septic arthritis of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, hip, knee, or ankle in adults.

Results: In total, 23 articles with 34,248 patients met the inclusion criteria comparing arthroscopy with arthrotomy. In 14 of the 20 (70%) studies that reported on reoperation rates, there was no significant difference in arthroscopic versus open surgical management for septic arthritis. Four (20%) studies reported lower reoperation rates when arthroscopy was utilized compared with open arthrotomy. One single-institution study found arthrotomy to be more effective for shoulder septic arthritis, and another favored open surgery only in the presence of erosions. In 11 of 23 (47.8%) studies, no difference in complications or clinical outcomes was found. However, 11 of 23 (47.8%) studies comprising the shoulder, wrist, hip, knee, and ankle reported a significant benefit to arthroscopy for improved outcomes.

Conclusion: Arthroscopic surgery for the treatment of septic arthritis involving the shoulder, wrist, hip, knee, and ankle appears to be safe and effective. Reoperation rates, short-term complications, and functional outcomes tend to be similar or in favor of arthroscopy when compared with arthrotomy.

背景:脓毒性关节炎的手术选择包括开放性关节切开术或关节镜手术。最佳的手术技术仍然是一个有争议的问题,因为两种方法的结果都是可以接受的。目的:评价关节镜与关节切开术治疗大中型关节脓毒性关节炎的疗效。研究设计:系统评价;证据水平,3。方法:对PubMed和Cochrane在线数据库进行文献检索,检索截至2023年9月的比较关节镜和关节切开术治疗脓毒性关节炎的文章。符合条件的文章包括回顾性或前瞻性比较研究,调查成人肩关节、肘关节、手腕、髋关节、膝关节或踝关节化脓性关节炎的再手术、围手术期并发症或关节镜或开放治疗后的临床结果。结果:比较关节镜与关节切开术,共有23篇文章34,248例患者符合纳入标准。20项研究中有14项(70%)报道了脓毒性关节炎的再手术率,其中关节镜与开放式手术治疗没有显著差异。四项(20%)研究报告,与开放式关节切开术相比,采用关节镜手术的再手术率较低。一项单一机构的研究发现,关节切开术对肩关节脓毒性关节炎更有效,而另一项研究则倾向于只在存在糜烂的情况下进行开放手术。23项研究中有11项(47.8%)未发现并发症或临床结果的差异。然而,23项研究中有11项(47.8%)包括肩关节、腕关节、髋关节、膝关节和踝关节,报告了关节镜对改善预后的显著益处。结论:关节镜手术治疗累及肩、腕、髋、膝和踝关节的脓毒性关节炎安全有效。与关节切开术相比,关节镜手术的再手术率、短期并发症和功能结果趋向相似或更有利于关节镜手术。
{"title":"Arthroscopy Is at Least as Effective as Arthrotomy for Treatment of Septic Arthritis in Adults: A Systematic Review of Large and Intermediate Joints.","authors":"Brandon M Nudelman, Amit S Piple, Richard D Ferkel","doi":"10.1177/03635465241285878","DOIUrl":"10.1177/03635465241285878","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical options for septic arthritis include open arthrotomy or an arthroscopic procedure. The optimal surgical technique remains a matter of debate as acceptable results have been reported for both.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of arthroscopy versus arthrotomy for the treatment of septic arthritis in large and intermediate-sized joints.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was performed of the PubMed and Cochrane online databases through September 2023 identifying articles comparing arthroscopy with arthrotomy for the treatment of septic arthritis. Eligible articles included retrospective or prospective comparative studies investigating reoperation, perioperative complications, or clinical outcomes after arthroscopic or open treatment for septic arthritis of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, hip, knee, or ankle in adults.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 23 articles with 34,248 patients met the inclusion criteria comparing arthroscopy with arthrotomy. In 14 of the 20 (70%) studies that reported on reoperation rates, there was no significant difference in arthroscopic versus open surgical management for septic arthritis. Four (20%) studies reported lower reoperation rates when arthroscopy was utilized compared with open arthrotomy. One single-institution study found arthrotomy to be more effective for shoulder septic arthritis, and another favored open surgery only in the presence of erosions. In 11 of 23 (47.8%) studies, no difference in complications or clinical outcomes was found. However, 11 of 23 (47.8%) studies comprising the shoulder, wrist, hip, knee, and ankle reported a significant benefit to arthroscopy for improved outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Arthroscopic surgery for the treatment of septic arthritis involving the shoulder, wrist, hip, knee, and ankle appears to be safe and effective. Reoperation rates, short-term complications, and functional outcomes tend to be similar or in favor of arthroscopy when compared with arthrotomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2007-2012"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142967387","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Best-Fit Circle Missing Area Method Shows Good Accuracy and Interrater Reliability When Assessing Glenoid Bone Loss. 最佳拟合圆缺失面积法在评估关节盂骨丢失时具有良好的准确性和可靠性。
IF 4.2 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-12 DOI: 10.1177/03635465251346838
Cortez L Brown, Clarissa M LeVasseur, Devon Scott, Jonathan D Hughes, Albert Lin, William J Anderst

Background: The amount of glenoid bone loss (GBL) in anterior shoulder instability helps determine management options. Unfortunately, there is no consensus on how to accurately measure GBL.

Hypothesis: The best-fit circle missing area method has better accuracy and interrater reliability than the ratio and diameter methods.

Study design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: Three-dimensional computed tomography shoulder scans were collected and segmented on 4 healthy male participants (mean age, 22.5 ± 3.4 years). For each scapula, 5 GBL models were created with known levels of GBL (5%-30%) in the anteroinferior glenoid rim. Ground-truth GBL was determined using the glenoid fossa edge and best-fit circle of the anteroinferior edge. Six blinded reviewers with varying expertise measured GBL for 20 randomized models using 3 different best-fit circle methods (missing area, ratio, and diameter). Accuracy was assessed by root mean square error and obtained by comparing measured and ground truth for bone loss for each model. Interrater reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) with a 2-way random-effects model with consistency.

Results: On average, the missing area method overestimated GBL by 1%, while the ratio method and diameter method overestimated GBL by 2.4% and 6.3%, respectively. The interrater reliabilities of the missing area (ICC, 0.89), ratio (ICC, 0.91), and diameter (ICC, 0.90) methods were good, excellent, and good, respectively. For all reviewers, the overall root mean square error of the missing area method (3.6%) was better than that of the ratio (5%) and diameter (7.9%) methods. When stratifying reviewer accuracy by level of training, the missing area method remained superior at all levels when compared with the ratio and diameter methods (attending [3.1% vs 3.8% and 8.9%], fellow [4.2% vs 6.3% and 8.4%], and resident [3.5% vs 4.6% and 6.3%]).

Conclusion: The best-fit circle missing area method was reliable and more accurate at measuring GBL than the other methods. This held true at all levels of surgical experience (resident, fellow, and attending).

Clinical relevance: The best-fit circle missing area method is accurate, has good reliability, and is simple. This can enhance preoperative planning for shoulder surgeons.

背景:肩关节前部不稳定中肩关节盂骨丢失(GBL)的数量有助于确定治疗方案。不幸的是,对于如何准确测量GBL还没有达成共识。假设:最佳拟合圆缺失面积法比比值法和直径法具有更好的准确度和互信度。研究设计:实验室对照研究。方法:收集4名健康男性(平均年龄22.5±3.4岁)的肩部三维计算机断层扫描图像并进行分割。对于每个肩胛骨,建立5个GBL模型,已知GBL水平(5%-30%)在前下盂缘。使用关节盂窝边缘和前下边缘的最佳拟合圆来确定基底真GBL。6位具有不同专业知识的盲法评论者使用3种不同的最佳拟合圆方法(缺失面积、比率和直径)测量了20个随机模型的GBL。准确度通过均方根误差来评估,并通过比较每个模型的骨质流失的测量值和实际值来获得。采用具有一致性的双向随机效应模型,采用类内相关系数(ICCs)评估组间信度。结果:缺失面积法平均高估GBL 1%,比值法和直径法分别高估GBL 2.4%和6.3%。缺失面积法(ICC, 0.89)、比值法(ICC, 0.91)和直径法(ICC, 0.90)的互译信度分别为良、优、良。对于所有评论者来说,缺失面积法的总体均方根误差(3.6%)优于比率法(5%)和直径法(7.9%)。当按培训水平对审稿人准确率进行分层时,与比率法和直径法相比,缺失面积法在所有级别上都保持优势(出席率[3.1%对3.8%和8.9%],研究员[4.2%对6.3%和8.4%],住院医师[3.5%对4.6%和6.3%])。结论:最佳拟合圆缺失面积法测定GBL可靠,准确度高于其他方法。这适用于所有层次的外科经验(住院医师、助理医师和主治医师)。临床意义:最佳拟合圆缺失面积法准确、可靠、简便。这可以提高肩外科手术的术前计划。
{"title":"Best-Fit Circle Missing Area Method Shows Good Accuracy and Interrater Reliability When Assessing Glenoid Bone Loss.","authors":"Cortez L Brown, Clarissa M LeVasseur, Devon Scott, Jonathan D Hughes, Albert Lin, William J Anderst","doi":"10.1177/03635465251346838","DOIUrl":"10.1177/03635465251346838","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The amount of glenoid bone loss (GBL) in anterior shoulder instability helps determine management options. Unfortunately, there is no consensus on how to accurately measure GBL.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>The best-fit circle missing area method has better accuracy and interrater reliability than the ratio and diameter methods.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Controlled laboratory study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three-dimensional computed tomography shoulder scans were collected and segmented on 4 healthy male participants (mean age, 22.5 ± 3.4 years). For each scapula, 5 GBL models were created with known levels of GBL (5%-30%) in the anteroinferior glenoid rim. Ground-truth GBL was determined using the glenoid fossa edge and best-fit circle of the anteroinferior edge. Six blinded reviewers with varying expertise measured GBL for 20 randomized models using 3 different best-fit circle methods (missing area, ratio, and diameter). Accuracy was assessed by root mean square error and obtained by comparing measured and ground truth for bone loss for each model. Interrater reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) with a 2-way random-effects model with consistency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On average, the missing area method overestimated GBL by 1%, while the ratio method and diameter method overestimated GBL by 2.4% and 6.3%, respectively. The interrater reliabilities of the missing area (ICC, 0.89), ratio (ICC, 0.91), and diameter (ICC, 0.90) methods were good, excellent, and good, respectively. For all reviewers, the overall root mean square error of the missing area method (3.6%) was better than that of the ratio (5%) and diameter (7.9%) methods. When stratifying reviewer accuracy by level of training, the missing area method remained superior at all levels when compared with the ratio and diameter methods (attending [3.1% vs 3.8% and 8.9%], fellow [4.2% vs 6.3% and 8.4%], and resident [3.5% vs 4.6% and 6.3%]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The best-fit circle missing area method was reliable and more accurate at measuring GBL than the other methods. This held true at all levels of surgical experience (resident, fellow, and attending).</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The best-fit circle missing area method is accurate, has good reliability, and is simple. This can enhance preoperative planning for shoulder surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2060-2065"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144276785","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
American Journal of Sports Medicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1