American Journal of Sports Medicine最新文献

Background: Currently, there is no uniform rehabilitation program concerning mobilization after a distal biceps tendon repair. A systematic review was conducted to investigate the effect of restrictions within the immediate postoperative period to evaluate clinical outcomes relative to mobilization after surgical repair of complete distal biceps tendon tears.

Hypothesis: Early mobilization will not have a significant difference on outcomes compared with delayed mobilization.

Study design: Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: The authors performed a systematic review in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines of studies reporting outcomes of the distal biceps tendon repair. The early mobilization cohort included studies with no restrictions beyond 2 weeks after surgery, and the delayed mobilization cohort included studies with continued restrictions beyond 2 weeks after surgery.

Results: A total of 26 studies with 1114 patients (643 in the delayed mobilization cohort and 471 in the early mobilization cohort) met the inclusion criteria, with a weighted mean patient age of 45.14 years (range, 18-76 years) and a mean follow-up of 27.9 months (range, 3-120 months). Meta-analysis at the 24-month follow-up found that range of motion (ROM) was not significantly different across early and delayed mobilization cohorts for flexion (mean, 137.38° vs 140.42°; P = .34) and extension (mean, 3.23° vs 1.5°; P = .91). Early mobilization was found to be significantly associated with less pronation (mean, 75.68° vs 83.18°; P = .0019) and supination (mean, 76.38° vs 83.93°; P = .0049). Analysis of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) found that Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores (mean, 3.93 vs 4.21; P = .77) and Mayo Elbow Performance Score values (mean, 96.33 vs 97.11;P = .65) were not significantly different across cohorts. Failure analysis found a significant difference when comparing proportion (mean, 0.0006 vs 0.0185; P = .0029) but no difference when comparing incidence rate (mean, 0.0001 vs 0.0001; P = .647). Complication analysis found no statistical difference in proportion (mean, 0.2181 vs 0.1918; P = .7388) or incidence rate (mean, 0.0012 vs 0.008; P = .344).

Conclusion: These results suggest there may be no clinically significant difference in failure rates, complications, ROM, or PROs for early versus delayed mobilization after primary distal biceps tendon repair.

Background: Anterior shoulder instability (ASI) is often seen in both contact and noncontact athletes, and the arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) procedure is among the most utilized procedures to treat patients with this condition. There is a lack of large studies comparing the return to sport (RTS), outcome, and recurrence rates after ABR in contact and noncontact athletes.

Purpose: To understand the differences in postoperative RTS, outcomes, and complications in contact and noncontact athletes after primary ABR for ASI.

Study design: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods: A systematic review was performed using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Included studies reported primary ABR without remplissage to treat ASI in athletes with a 1-year minimum follow-up. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed to compare outcomes.

Results: Of the 1575 screened studies, 31 studies (2387 shoulders) were included. The mean age was 23.3 years (range, 13-50 years; SD, 2.97 years), 89% of the athletes were male, and the mean follow-up was 55.1 months (range, 12-107 months; SD, 22.8 months). Contact and noncontact athletes had similar rates of RTS (79% [95% CI, 63%-89%] and 91% [95% CI, 82%-96%], respectively; P = .079) and return to preinjury level (71% [95% CI, 56%-82%] and 79% [95% CI, 73%-85%], respectively; P = .201). Contact and noncontact athletes also demonstrated similar rates of revision surgery (6% [95% CI, 3%-13%] and 4% [95% CI, 3%-7%], respectively; P = .334). Contact athletes, however, exhibited a significantly higher rate of recurrent instability than noncontact athletes (17% [95% CI, 10%-27%] vs 8% [95% CI, 6%-12%]; P = .023).

Conclusion: Compared with noncontact athletes, contact athletes demonstrate similar rates of RTS, return to preinjury level of play, and need for revision surgery but a higher rate of recurrent instability after primary ABR for ASI.

Background: Accurate femoral tunnel positioning is essential for successful anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Tunnel malposition can happen due to limited arthroscopic visibility as well as anatomic variance. The use of customized patient-specific guides can optimize surgical planning and enhance accuracy.

Purpose: To compare femoral tunnel positioning in 3-dimensional (3D)-assisted ACL reconstruction versus conventional surgery.

Study design: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in line with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines with a search of the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing the 2 interventions were included. Primary outcomes included tunnel positioning time (minutes) and accuracy rates (%). Secondary outcomes were Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) functional scores. Random effects modeling was used for analysis.

Results: Four RCTs and 1 retrospective study were included, enrolling a total of 299 patients. The 3D group had significantly shorter tunnel positioning times (mean difference, -2.80; 95% CI, -4.13 to -1.46; P < .0001) with significantly greater tunnel positioning accuracy (odds ratio, 4.62; 95% CI, 1.02 to 20.89; P = .05). No significant difference was noted in postoperative functional scores, including Lysholm and IKDC scores (P > .05).

Conclusion: The use of 3D guides helps reduce tunnel positioning time and increases tunnel positioning accuracy with comparable postoperative functional outcomes.

Background: Meniscal allograft transplantation replaces damaged meniscal tissue with grafts, aiming to restore knee stability and function. The method employed in the fixation of the meniscal graft-suture or bony fixation-has sparked clinical interest and ongoing discussions.

Purpose: To compare suture fixation with bony fixation of the meniscal graft, with the focus on functional and clinical outcomes.

Study design: Meta-analysis and systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods: Meta-analyses were performed with a multidatabase search according to PRISMA guidelines on August 15, 2023. Data from published articles meeting inclusion criteria were extracted and analyzed with an inverse variance statistical model.

Results: A total of 6 studies were included consisting of 334 patients: 184 suture fixation and 150 bony fixation. No statistical analysis could be performed for clinical outcomes given the heterogeneity of raw data, but no observable trends were observed from individual studies. Suture and bony fixation showed no statistically significant difference in the risks of infection (relative risk [RR], 1.52; 95% CI, 0.29-7.80; P = .62), graft failure (RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.19-3.78; P = .84), graft tear (RR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.10-13.21; P = .91), minor graft extrusion (RR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.20-2.92; P = .70), and major graft extrusion (RR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.28-5.07; P = .81).

Conclusion: There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes or complications between suture and bony fixation of meniscal grafts. However, the short- to medium-term follow-up in this meta-analysis prompts the need for studies with long-term follow-up, given that meniscal allograft transplantation longevity is of utmost importance in this patient group to restore function and potentially reduce the risk of arthritis progression.

Background: Understanding clinical and tissue adaptations to the throwing shoulder is important for optimizing injury prevention and rehabilitation programs in baseball players.

Purpose/hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to determine the chronic clinical (range of motion [ROM] and strength) and tissue adaptations of the throwing shoulder in baseball pitchers. It was hypothesized that the throwing shoulder would have increased external rotation (ER) ROM and decreased internal rotation (IR) ROM compared with the nonthrowing shoulder, but that calculations of soft tissue glenohumeral IR deficit (GIRD) and soft tissue ER gain (ERG) would show that the true soft tissue restrictions were instead in the direction of ER ROM.

Study design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods: This systematic review was performed according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines using various keywords related to the shoulder and baseball. Studies were included if chronic adaptations of the shoulder were evaluated bilaterally in nonrecreational baseball pitchers. Outcomes of interest collected include IR and ER ROM measured in 90° of shoulder abduction, humeral retroversion (HR), GIRD, ERG, and various structural adaptations. All other chronic adaptations were compiled and reported qualitatively because of the heterogeneity of variables assessed.

Results: Overall, 1273 studies were screened and 36 met final inclusion criteria, with 24 studies (67%) evaluating professional pitchers. Across 13 studies and 1101 professional pitchers, the mean clinical GIRD was 10.0° and the mean clinical ERG was 6.5°, leading to a total arc of ROM deficit of 3.5° in the throwing shoulder. Across 498 included pitchers with HR measures, the mean bilateral difference in HR was 15.4°. After calculating soft tissue GIRD, 3 of 4 studies found that pitchers do not have any soft tissue restrictions in IR ROM. In contrast, after calculating soft tissue ERG, all 4 studies found pitchers to have soft tissue restrictions in ER ROM with a mean of 8° to 13°.

Conclusion: When isolating for soft tissue restrictions through calculation of soft tissue GIRD and ERG, previously reported IR ROM deficits are currently not as prevalent, and soft tissue restrictions in ER ROM are now being observed. Clinicians should focus on better isolating soft tissue restrictions to evaluate whether an athlete has deficits in IR or ER ROM.

Background: There has been an increased interest in meniscus preservation over the last decade. Several risk factors for the failure of meniscal repair have been identified. However, the timing of meniscal repair has not been extensively assessed in the literature, and there is currently no high-quality evidence on the optimal timing of performing meniscal repair after an injury with regard to outcomes.

Purpose: To assess the role of the timing of meniscal repair on outcomes in the literature.

Study design: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods: The databases of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched in October 2023 for studies comparing the outcomes of early versus delayed meniscal repair. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they reported outcomes within and after a time threshold (eg, within and after 3 weeks). Random-effects models were used.

Results: A total of 35 studies with 3556 patients and 3767 menisci were included (mean age, 27.5 years; 66% male; mean follow-up, 4.5 years). Most studies were level 3 or 4 evidence, and the overall quality was low. The failure rates of meniscal repair were 11.3% versus 24.1% within versus after 2 weeks, respectively (7 studies, 511 patients; odds ratio [OR], 0.50 [95% CI, 0.22-1.16]; P = .11); 7.2% versus 15.3% within versus after 3 weeks, respectively (5 studies, 556 patients; OR, 0.28 [95% CI, 0.10-0.79]; P = .02); 15.7% versus 21.3% within versus after 6 weeks, respectively (7 studies, 746 patients; OR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.33-1.18]; P = .15); and 10.2% versus 18.7% within versus after 8 weeks, respectively (7 studies, 652 patients; OR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.26-0.87]; P = .02); these were significant for 3 and 8 weeks. No differences were seen for within versus after 3 months (7 studies, 1305 patients; 22.4% vs 18.5%, respectively; OR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.47-2.33]; P = .92).

Conclusion: The timing of meniscal surgery was correlated with the likelihood of success, and meniscal repair should preferably be performed within 8 weeks of the injury, with the earliest benefit at 3 weeks. Clinicians should take this into consideration when recommending operative treatment or initial nonoperative treatment.

Background: National Football League (NFL) athletes face a substantial risk for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, particularly during special team plays. ACL injuries commonly occur during change-of-direction (CoD) scenarios. Player tracking is standardized for all NFL games and can be used to quantify player motion intensity during CoD injury scenarios.

Purpose: The purpose was to identify ACL injuries during CoD scenarios in the NFL. We investigated whether player tracking metrics derived from on-field play can predict an increased ACL injury risk during CoD scenarios.

Study design: Descriptive epidemiology study.

Methods: For all ACL injuries (n = 216) occurring in games during the 2018 to 2022 NFL seasons, the injury timing and injury scenario were identified through a video review. Motion characteristics of ACL injuries during CoD scenarios were identified from player tracking data, and a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) was developed to quantify whether player tracking metrics were predictive of the ACL injury risk during CoD scenarios.

Results: Among the ACL injuries reviewed, 32% were noncontact, 42% were indirect contact, and 46% were classified as CoD scenarios. Of the athletes involved in a CoD scenario, 98% were decelerating at the time of their ACL injury. Maximum speed (odds ratio, 1.52 per 1-m/s increase in maximum speed) and normalized maximum deceleration power (odds ratio, 1.08 per 1-W/kg increase in maximum deceleration power) were both significant predictors of the CoD ACL injury risk. Punt and kickoff returns had a significantly increased CoD ACL injury risk only when maximum speed and normalized maximum deceleration power metrics were excluded from the GLMM.

Conclusion: ACL injuries in NFL games primarily occurred during CoD scenarios. Player tracking data analyzed for CoD ACL injuries demonstrated a consistent movement pattern involving high speeds and deceleration at the time of the injury. Both a player's maximum speed and normalized maximum deceleration power were significant predictors of an increased CoD ACL injury risk. The inclusion of these metrics in a GLMM helped to explain the variation in CoD ACL injury rates observed across different play types.