首页 > 最新文献

American Journal of Emergency Medicine最新文献

英文 中文
Reassessing predictive modeling for emergency department return in COVID-19 patients. COVID-19患者急诊复诊预测模型的再评估
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.009
Nguyen Minh Hieu, Yoshiyasu Takefuji
{"title":"Reassessing predictive modeling for emergency department return in COVID-19 patients.","authors":"Nguyen Minh Hieu, Yoshiyasu Takefuji","doi":"10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.009","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":55536,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143016987","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Emergency physician ultrasound diagnosis of pneumoperitoneum in intraoperative patients with peritoneal insufflation.
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.023
Amy Sanghvi, Makoto Tanigawa, Michael Danta, Jeff Yang, Mohammad Hamshow, Errel Khordipour, Lawrence Haines, Leily Naraghi

Objectives: To determine the accuracy of emergency physicians (EPs) in diagnosing pneumoperitoneum with POCUS, and if the volume of pneumoperitoneum affects accuracy.

Methods: POCUS clips were obtained from patients undergoing intraperitoneal insufflation for an elective laparoscopic procedure. Video clips of the right upper quadrant and epigastric regions were obtained prior to insufflation and then after 500 ml, 1000 ml, and 1500 ml of insufflation. These clips were randomized and reviewed by three blinded ultrasound-trained EPs. For each clip they determined whether pneumoperitoneum was present or not.

Results: EPs chose correctly 71 % of the time. Overall sensitivity for detecting pneumoperitoneum was 66 % with a specificity of 85 %. Sensitivity for detecting small, medium, and large volumes of air was 53 %, 70 %, and 73 % respectively. The AUC for pneumoperitoneum overall was 0.753. The AUC for detecting small, medium, and large volumes of air was 0.688, 0.773, and 0.789 respectively. There was substantial agreement between EPs with a kappa of 0.658.

Conclusions: POCUS for pneumoperitoneum had moderate sensitivity, high specificity and moderate accuracy. The sensitivities increased with increasing volumes of air. This data suggests that POCUS has similar sensitivity to CXR for pneumoperitoneum.

{"title":"Emergency physician ultrasound diagnosis of pneumoperitoneum in intraoperative patients with peritoneal insufflation.","authors":"Amy Sanghvi, Makoto Tanigawa, Michael Danta, Jeff Yang, Mohammad Hamshow, Errel Khordipour, Lawrence Haines, Leily Naraghi","doi":"10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the accuracy of emergency physicians (EPs) in diagnosing pneumoperitoneum with POCUS, and if the volume of pneumoperitoneum affects accuracy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>POCUS clips were obtained from patients undergoing intraperitoneal insufflation for an elective laparoscopic procedure. Video clips of the right upper quadrant and epigastric regions were obtained prior to insufflation and then after 500 ml, 1000 ml, and 1500 ml of insufflation. These clips were randomized and reviewed by three blinded ultrasound-trained EPs. For each clip they determined whether pneumoperitoneum was present or not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EPs chose correctly 71 % of the time. Overall sensitivity for detecting pneumoperitoneum was 66 % with a specificity of 85 %. Sensitivity for detecting small, medium, and large volumes of air was 53 %, 70 %, and 73 % respectively. The AUC for pneumoperitoneum overall was 0.753. The AUC for detecting small, medium, and large volumes of air was 0.688, 0.773, and 0.789 respectively. There was substantial agreement between EPs with a kappa of 0.658.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>POCUS for pneumoperitoneum had moderate sensitivity, high specificity and moderate accuracy. The sensitivities increased with increasing volumes of air. This data suggests that POCUS has similar sensitivity to CXR for pneumoperitoneum.</p>","PeriodicalId":55536,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"90 ","pages":"120-123"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143042530","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correspondence to "Local anaesthesia systemic toxicity following erector spinae plane blocks: Does dose matter?" 对应于“竖脊肌平面阻滞后的局部麻醉全身毒性:剂量有影响吗?”
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.021
Anthony Rauschenbach, Robert F Reardon
{"title":"Correspondence to \"Local anaesthesia systemic toxicity following erector spinae plane blocks: Does dose matter?\"","authors":"Anthony Rauschenbach, Robert F Reardon","doi":"10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.021","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":55536,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143016982","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Local anaesthesia systemic toxicity following erector spinae plane block: Does dose matter? 竖脊肌平面阻滞后局部麻醉的全身毒性:剂量有关系吗?
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.020
Anju Gupta, Upendra Hansda, Amiya Kumar Barik, Chitta Ranjan Mohanty, Rakesh Vadakkethil Radhakrishnan, Sugantha Priya
{"title":"Local anaesthesia systemic toxicity following erector spinae plane block: Does dose matter?","authors":"Anju Gupta, Upendra Hansda, Amiya Kumar Barik, Chitta Ranjan Mohanty, Rakesh Vadakkethil Radhakrishnan, Sugantha Priya","doi":"10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.020","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":55536,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143016986","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effect of epinephrine administration interval on cerebral perfusion in a porcine cardiac arrest model. 肾上腺素给药间隔时间对猪心脏骤停模型脑灌注的影响。
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.019
Ki Hong Kim, Ki Jeong Hong, Sang Do Shin, Kyoung Jun Song, Yoonjic Kim, Dong Hyun Choi, Jeong Ho Park, Tae Han Kim, Joo Jeong, Young Sun Ro, Hyun Jeong Kang

Objectives: The recommended epinephrine administration interval during CPR is between 3 and 5 min. However, the optimal interval for improving cerebral perfusion remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of epinephrine administration interval of 3 min or 5 min on cerebral perfusion pressure (CEPP) and cortical cerebral blood flow (CCBF) in a porcine cardiac arrest model.

Methods: An experimental model of ventricular fibrillation (VF) cardiac arrest was conducted using 26 pigs, randomised into 3-min and 5-min interval groups. Six minutes after VF induction, all pigs received 4 min of chest compressions, followed by 20 min of advanced cardiovascular life support, including defibrillation and intravenous epinephrine administration. CEPP and CCBF were measured simultaneously throughout the experiment.

Results: Each of the experimental groups comprised 13 pigs. The 3-min group showed higher CEPP compared with the 5-min group in between 16 min and 20 min, 26 min and 30 min from VF induction: mean (95 % Confidence intervals) 26.8 (4.7-49.0) mmHg for 3-min group and 11.3 (-5.7-28.3) mmHg for 5-min group in 18 to 20 min from VF induction, which showed biggest difference. No significant difference was observed in CCBF between the 3-min and 5-min groups throughout the resuscitation phase (from the first epinephrine administration): The relative ratios 6 to 8 min after VF induction ranged from 0.21 to 0.86 in the 3-min group, and 0.35 to 0.77 in the 5-min group.

Conclusion: The 3-min epinephrine administration interval showed a higher CEPP compared with the 5-min interval. No significant differences were found in the CCBF between the two interval groups.

目的:心肺复苏术中推荐的肾上腺素给药间隔时间为3 - 5分钟。然而,改善脑灌注的最佳间隔时间仍存在争议。本研究旨在评价肾上腺素给药间隔3 min或5 min对猪心脏骤停模型脑灌注压(CEPP)和脑皮质血流量(CCBF)的影响。方法:将26头猪随机分为间隔时间3 min和5 min两组,建立心室颤动(VF)心脏骤停实验模型。VF诱导6分钟后,所有猪接受4分钟胸外按压,随后进行20分钟高级心血管生命支持,包括除颤和静脉肾上腺素给药。在整个实验过程中同时测量CEPP和CCBF。结果:每组13头猪。在VF诱导后16 ~ 20分钟、26 ~ 30分钟,3 min组的CEPP高于5 min组:VF诱导后18 ~ 20分钟,3 min组的平均(95%置信区间)为26.8 (4.7 ~ 49.0)mmHg, 5 min组的平均(-5.7 ~ 28.3)mmHg,差异最大。在整个复苏阶段(从第一次肾上腺素给药开始),3分钟组和5分钟组的CCBF无显著差异:在VF诱导后6 ~ 8分钟,3分钟组的相对比值为0.21 ~ 0.86,5分钟组的相对比值为0.35 ~ 0.77。结论:3 min肾上腺素给药间隔较5 min肾上腺素给药间隔有较高的CEPP。两组间期CCBF无显著差异。
{"title":"Effect of epinephrine administration interval on cerebral perfusion in a porcine cardiac arrest model.","authors":"Ki Hong Kim, Ki Jeong Hong, Sang Do Shin, Kyoung Jun Song, Yoonjic Kim, Dong Hyun Choi, Jeong Ho Park, Tae Han Kim, Joo Jeong, Young Sun Ro, Hyun Jeong Kang","doi":"10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.019","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The recommended epinephrine administration interval during CPR is between 3 and 5 min. However, the optimal interval for improving cerebral perfusion remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of epinephrine administration interval of 3 min or 5 min on cerebral perfusion pressure (CEPP) and cortical cerebral blood flow (CCBF) in a porcine cardiac arrest model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An experimental model of ventricular fibrillation (VF) cardiac arrest was conducted using 26 pigs, randomised into 3-min and 5-min interval groups. Six minutes after VF induction, all pigs received 4 min of chest compressions, followed by 20 min of advanced cardiovascular life support, including defibrillation and intravenous epinephrine administration. CEPP and CCBF were measured simultaneously throughout the experiment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Each of the experimental groups comprised 13 pigs. The 3-min group showed higher CEPP compared with the 5-min group in between 16 min and 20 min, 26 min and 30 min from VF induction: mean (95 % Confidence intervals) 26.8 (4.7-49.0) mmHg for 3-min group and 11.3 (-5.7-28.3) mmHg for 5-min group in 18 to 20 min from VF induction, which showed biggest difference. No significant difference was observed in CCBF between the 3-min and 5-min groups throughout the resuscitation phase (from the first epinephrine administration): The relative ratios 6 to 8 min after VF induction ranged from 0.21 to 0.86 in the 3-min group, and 0.35 to 0.77 in the 5-min group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 3-min epinephrine administration interval showed a higher CEPP compared with the 5-min interval. No significant differences were found in the CCBF between the two interval groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":55536,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"90 ","pages":"81-87"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143016990","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Predictors of mortality among sepsis patients transferred from a rural, low-volume ED to an urban, high-volume hospital. 脓毒症患者从农村小容量急诊科转到城市大容量医院的死亡率预测因素
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.018
Arman Ameripour, Elizabeth Herrera, Olivia Coskey, Justin Ng, Cesar Cornejo Ochoa, Allison Modesette, Jenny T Lee, Truman Ray K G C Chun, Jasmeet Kaur, Andrew W Hertel, Barry C Smith, Brian L Delmonaco

Introduction: We investigated the extent to which demographic characteristics, clinical care aspects, and relevant biomarkers predicted sepsis-related mortality among patients transferred from a rural, low-volume emergency department (ED) to an urban, high-volume, level-2 trauma center.

Methods: We conducted an observational study among adult severe sepsis patients (N = 242) who, within a community-based regional healthcare system, presented to one of the four rural, low-volume EDs and were subsequently transferred to the urban, high-volume, level-2 trauma center, and were identified as septic at either location. We evaluated in-hospital and 30 days after discharge mortality.

Results: In-hospital mortality rate was predicted by previous admission to an ICU (OR 5.02, 95 % CI: 1.89-15.94, p = 0.002), identification of sepsis prior to transfer (OR 0.29, 95 % CI: 0.11-0.74, p = 0.01), and a moderately abnormal lactate level (OR 0.22, 95 % CI: 0.05-0.79, p = 0.03). Mortality 30 days after discharge was predicted by previous admission to an ICU (OR: 3.28, 95 % CI: 1.62-6.97, p = 0.001), abnormal red cell distribution width (OR: 2.23, 95 % CI: 1.11-4.60, p = 0.03), identification of sepsis prior to transfer (OR: 0.26, 95 % CI: 0.12-0.54, p < 0.001), and a moderately abnormal lactate (OR: 0.32, 95 % CI: 0.12-0.79, p = 0.02).

Discussion: Early identification of sepsis, as well as attention to prior ICU admission or comorbidities and abnormal red cell distribution width, could facilitate better care and prevent mortality among patients with sepsis who are transferred from a rural, low-volume emergency department to an urban-high volume facility.

前言:我们调查了人口统计学特征、临床护理方面和相关生物标志物在多大程度上预测了从农村小容量急诊科(ED)转到城市大容量二级创伤中心的患者败血症相关死亡率。方法:我们对成人严重脓毒症患者(N = 242)进行了一项观察性研究,这些患者在社区区域医疗保健系统内就诊于四家农村低容量急诊科之一,随后转至城市高容量二级创伤中心,并在两家医院均被确诊为脓毒症。我们评估了住院和出院后30天的死亡率。结果:住院死亡率可通过以下因素预测:(OR 5.02, 95% CI: 1.89-15.94, p = 0.002)、转移前是否发现败血症(OR 0.29, 95% CI: 0.11-0.74, p = 0.01)和中度乳酸水平异常(OR 0.22, 95% CI: 0.05-0.79, p = 0.03)。出院后30天的死亡率可通过以下因素预测:曾入住ICU (OR: 3.28, 95% CI: 1.62 ~ 6.97, p = 0.001)、异常红细胞分布宽度(OR: 2.23, 95% CI: 1.11 ~ 4.60, p = 0.03)、转院前是否发现败血症(OR: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.12 ~ 0.54, p)脓毒症的早期识别,以及对先前ICU入住或合并症和异常红细胞分布宽度的关注,可以促进从农村低容量急诊部门转移到城市高容量设施的脓毒症患者的更好护理和预防死亡。
{"title":"Predictors of mortality among sepsis patients transferred from a rural, low-volume ED to an urban, high-volume hospital.","authors":"Arman Ameripour, Elizabeth Herrera, Olivia Coskey, Justin Ng, Cesar Cornejo Ochoa, Allison Modesette, Jenny T Lee, Truman Ray K G C Chun, Jasmeet Kaur, Andrew W Hertel, Barry C Smith, Brian L Delmonaco","doi":"10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.018","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We investigated the extent to which demographic characteristics, clinical care aspects, and relevant biomarkers predicted sepsis-related mortality among patients transferred from a rural, low-volume emergency department (ED) to an urban, high-volume, level-2 trauma center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an observational study among adult severe sepsis patients (N = 242) who, within a community-based regional healthcare system, presented to one of the four rural, low-volume EDs and were subsequently transferred to the urban, high-volume, level-2 trauma center, and were identified as septic at either location. We evaluated in-hospital and 30 days after discharge mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In-hospital mortality rate was predicted by previous admission to an ICU (OR 5.02, 95 % CI: 1.89-15.94, p = 0.002), identification of sepsis prior to transfer (OR 0.29, 95 % CI: 0.11-0.74, p = 0.01), and a moderately abnormal lactate level (OR 0.22, 95 % CI: 0.05-0.79, p = 0.03). Mortality 30 days after discharge was predicted by previous admission to an ICU (OR: 3.28, 95 % CI: 1.62-6.97, p = 0.001), abnormal red cell distribution width (OR: 2.23, 95 % CI: 1.11-4.60, p = 0.03), identification of sepsis prior to transfer (OR: 0.26, 95 % CI: 0.12-0.54, p < 0.001), and a moderately abnormal lactate (OR: 0.32, 95 % CI: 0.12-0.79, p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Early identification of sepsis, as well as attention to prior ICU admission or comorbidities and abnormal red cell distribution width, could facilitate better care and prevent mortality among patients with sepsis who are transferred from a rural, low-volume emergency department to an urban-high volume facility.</p>","PeriodicalId":55536,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"90 ","pages":"61-64"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143016994","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The impact of an All-Hazard mass casualty event on emergency department operations: A retrospective study. 全危害大规模伤亡事件对急诊科操作的影响:一项回顾性研究。
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.004
Matan Peer, Zachary A Trotzky, Joseph Offenbacher, David Mazor, Aya Cohen, Eldar Azar, Gal Pachys, Baruch Berzon, Daniel Trotzky

Background: Mass Casualty Events (MCI) which have a direct and persisting impact on the safety and well-being of an emergency department (ED) and its staff, secondary to specific targeting of the healthcare setting, represent a distinct and complex operational challenge. ED physicians may be faced with the prospect of providing ongoing patient care while simultaneously experiencing direct threats to their own health or physical safety. In our study we considered the unique operational challenges encountered, and management strategies adopted, by the ED staff and its leadership to an all-hazard MCI impacting an academic urban emergency department.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective, observational study of data from a tertiary academic medical center of patients arriving to the ED during a protracted MCI lasting from May 11th to May 21st, 2021. No arriving patients were excluded from analysis. Patient demographics, ED resource utilization, throughput, disposition and other pertinent data were considered. Analysis was done of three distinct patient populations including the event-group (EG), a non-event-group (NEG) and a control group (CG). Descriptive statistics were used to evaluating observational findings.

Results: We reviewed the records of 8527 total patients presenting to the Shamir Medical Center ED during the event and control periods. Of those, 283 patients were identified as an EG consisting of casualties from the MCI. 3563 patients were identified as the NEG presenting with complaints not related to the event. Our CG consisted of the 4681 patients who presented in the two weeks prior to the MCI. EG patients were noted to have important characteristics including higher relative numbers of men n = 173 (61.6 %), higher CTAS triage acuities [n = 10 (3.8 %), classified as CTAS 1], and an increase utilization of specialty consultation and admission consistent with observed injury patterns, most notably for the orthopedic services [orthopedic consultations: n = 126 (44.5 %) / orthopedic admissions: n = 13 (4.6 %)].

Conclusion: Findings from our observational study suggested that in the absence of larger public health interventions a manmade MCI, with direct threats to an ED and its staff, could force EDs to concurrently address the unique clinical needs of two distinct patient populations while simultaneously needing to take measures to protect hospital staff. Additionally, a higher burden of patient volumes and clinical acuity are likely to be encountered by select specialty consultation services. Further studies could focus on quantitative analysis to better understand the operational impact of these types of events on both patients and staff.

背景:大规模伤亡事件(MCI)会对急诊科(ED)及其工作人员的安全和福祉造成直接和持续的影响,并继发于特定的医疗环境目标,是一项独特而复杂的业务挑战。急诊科医生在为病人提供持续护理的同时,自身的健康或人身安全也可能受到直接威胁。在我们的研究中,我们考虑了急诊科工作人员及其领导层在应对影响城市学术急诊科的全危险 MCI 时所遇到的独特操作挑战和采取的管理策略:我们对一家三级学术医疗中心在 2021 年 5 月 11 日至 5 月 21 日发生的长期 MCI 期间急诊科收治病人的数据进行了回顾性观察研究。分析中未排除任何到达患者。研究考虑了患者的人口统计学特征、急诊室资源利用率、吞吐量、处置情况和其他相关数据。对三个不同的患者群体进行了分析,包括事件组(EG)、非事件组(NEG)和对照组(CG)。使用描述性统计来评估观察结果:我们查阅了事件组和对照组期间在沙米尔医疗中心急诊室就诊的 8527 名患者的病历。其中,283 名患者被确定为由 MCI 伤员组成的 EG,3563 名患者被确定为 NEG。3563 名患者被确定为 NEG,其主诉与事件无关。我们的 CG 包括在 MCI 前两周内就诊的 4681 名患者。EG患者具有一些重要特征,包括男性相对较多n = 173 (61.6%)、CTAS分流急性期较高[n = 10 (3.8%),被归类为CTAS 1],以及与观察到的受伤模式一致的专科会诊和入院利用率增加,最明显的是骨科服务[骨科会诊:n = 126 (44.5%) / 骨科入院:n = 13 (4.6%)]:我们的观察性研究结果表明,如果没有更大规模的公共卫生干预措施,人为的 MCI 会对急诊室及其工作人员造成直接威胁,从而迫使急诊室在采取措施保护医院工作人员的同时,还要同时满足两个不同患者群体的独特临床需求。此外,特定专科会诊服务可能会遇到病人量更大和临床症状更严重的情况。进一步的研究可以侧重于定量分析,以更好地了解此类事件对患者和员工的操作影响。
{"title":"The impact of an All-Hazard mass casualty event on emergency department operations: A retrospective study.","authors":"Matan Peer, Zachary A Trotzky, Joseph Offenbacher, David Mazor, Aya Cohen, Eldar Azar, Gal Pachys, Baruch Berzon, Daniel Trotzky","doi":"10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mass Casualty Events (MCI) which have a direct and persisting impact on the safety and well-being of an emergency department (ED) and its staff, secondary to specific targeting of the healthcare setting, represent a distinct and complex operational challenge. ED physicians may be faced with the prospect of providing ongoing patient care while simultaneously experiencing direct threats to their own health or physical safety. In our study we considered the unique operational challenges encountered, and management strategies adopted, by the ED staff and its leadership to an all-hazard MCI impacting an academic urban emergency department.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective, observational study of data from a tertiary academic medical center of patients arriving to the ED during a protracted MCI lasting from May 11th to May 21st, 2021. No arriving patients were excluded from analysis. Patient demographics, ED resource utilization, throughput, disposition and other pertinent data were considered. Analysis was done of three distinct patient populations including the event-group (EG), a non-event-group (NEG) and a control group (CG). Descriptive statistics were used to evaluating observational findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We reviewed the records of 8527 total patients presenting to the Shamir Medical Center ED during the event and control periods. Of those, 283 patients were identified as an EG consisting of casualties from the MCI. 3563 patients were identified as the NEG presenting with complaints not related to the event. Our CG consisted of the 4681 patients who presented in the two weeks prior to the MCI. EG patients were noted to have important characteristics including higher relative numbers of men n = 173 (61.6 %), higher CTAS triage acuities [n = 10 (3.8 %), classified as CTAS 1], and an increase utilization of specialty consultation and admission consistent with observed injury patterns, most notably for the orthopedic services [orthopedic consultations: n = 126 (44.5 %) / orthopedic admissions: n = 13 (4.6 %)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings from our observational study suggested that in the absence of larger public health interventions a manmade MCI, with direct threats to an ED and its staff, could force EDs to concurrently address the unique clinical needs of two distinct patient populations while simultaneously needing to take measures to protect hospital staff. Additionally, a higher burden of patient volumes and clinical acuity are likely to be encountered by select specialty consultation services. Further studies could focus on quantitative analysis to better understand the operational impact of these types of events on both patients and staff.</p>","PeriodicalId":55536,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"90 ","pages":"41-46"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142973447","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What's the bug?: An unusual cause of bacterial meningitis in a patient with history of transsphenoidal surgery.
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.017
Sara Lin, Phillip Scott, Ina Prevalska, Mary Haas

Bacterial meningitis is an increasingly rare disease that carries significant morbidity and mortality. We describe the case of a 38-year-old male with a past medical history of pituitary macroadenoma with prior endonasal surgeries on prednisone therapy daily for resultant hypopituitarism and juvenile myoclonic epilepsy on lamotrigine daily who was transferred to an academic tertiary emergency department due to concern for developing pituitary apoplexy. At the outside emergency department, the patient presented complaining of sudden onset severe headache. CT scan demonstrated residual pituitary mass but no additional findings. On arrival to our emergency department, the patient was altered and newly febrile. Physical exam was notable for the patient moving all extremities and opening eyes spontaneously but unable to follow commands with a positive Kernig's sign. Broad spectrum antibiotics, antivirals, and stress dosed steroids were started due to concern for meningitis, and Neurology and Neurosurgery were consulted. Repeat CT was obtained prior to lumbar puncture (LP). LP demonstrated bacterial meningitis, which later speciated to Streptococcus salivarius. The patient was admitted to the medical ICU and discharged with full neurologic recovery on hospital day 13. This case demonstrates the variable presentation of bacterial meningitis as the patient was not initially febrile or altered. Emergency physicians index of suspicion for meningitis should be increased with risk factors such as immunosuppression and history of transsphenoidal surgery, as in our patient. Our case is a unique case of Streptococcus salivarius meningitis that has been previously associated with primarily iatrogenic etiologies.

细菌性脑膜炎是一种越来越罕见的疾病,发病率和死亡率都很高。我们描述了一例 38 岁男性患者的病例,该患者既往有垂体大腺瘤病史,曾接受过鼻内镜手术,每天服用强的松治疗,结果导致垂体功能减退,同时每天服用拉莫三嗪治疗幼年肌阵挛性癫痫。在外院急诊科,患者主诉突发剧烈头痛。CT 扫描显示有残留垂体肿块,但没有其他发现。到达我院急诊科时,患者神志改变,新近发热。体格检查显示,患者四肢活动自如,能睁开眼睛,但无法听从指令,克尼格征阳性。由于担心会引发脑膜炎,医生开始使用广谱抗生素、抗病毒药物和应激剂量类固醇,并咨询了神经内科和神经外科。在进行腰椎穿刺(LP)之前,再次进行了 CT 检查。腰椎穿刺显示患者患有细菌性脑膜炎,后来确诊为唾液链球菌。患者被送入内科重症监护室,住院第 13 天神经功能完全恢复出院。该病例表明,细菌性脑膜炎的表现多种多样,因为患者最初并没有发热或体征改变。急诊医生对脑膜炎的怀疑指数应随着免疫抑制和经蝶手术史等风险因素的增加而增加,就像我们的患者一样。我们的病例是一个独特的唾液链球菌脑膜炎病例,以前主要与先天性病因有关。
{"title":"What's the bug?: An unusual cause of bacterial meningitis in a patient with history of transsphenoidal surgery.","authors":"Sara Lin, Phillip Scott, Ina Prevalska, Mary Haas","doi":"10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.017","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bacterial meningitis is an increasingly rare disease that carries significant morbidity and mortality. We describe the case of a 38-year-old male with a past medical history of pituitary macroadenoma with prior endonasal surgeries on prednisone therapy daily for resultant hypopituitarism and juvenile myoclonic epilepsy on lamotrigine daily who was transferred to an academic tertiary emergency department due to concern for developing pituitary apoplexy. At the outside emergency department, the patient presented complaining of sudden onset severe headache. CT scan demonstrated residual pituitary mass but no additional findings. On arrival to our emergency department, the patient was altered and newly febrile. Physical exam was notable for the patient moving all extremities and opening eyes spontaneously but unable to follow commands with a positive Kernig's sign. Broad spectrum antibiotics, antivirals, and stress dosed steroids were started due to concern for meningitis, and Neurology and Neurosurgery were consulted. Repeat CT was obtained prior to lumbar puncture (LP). LP demonstrated bacterial meningitis, which later speciated to Streptococcus salivarius. The patient was admitted to the medical ICU and discharged with full neurologic recovery on hospital day 13. This case demonstrates the variable presentation of bacterial meningitis as the patient was not initially febrile or altered. Emergency physicians index of suspicion for meningitis should be increased with risk factors such as immunosuppression and history of transsphenoidal surgery, as in our patient. Our case is a unique case of Streptococcus salivarius meningitis that has been previously associated with primarily iatrogenic etiologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":55536,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143042393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reply to correspondence "Mortality risk factors in patients receiving ECPR after cardiac arrest". 回复信函“心脏骤停后接受ECPR患者的死亡危险因素”。
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.014
Zhe Li, Feilong Hei
{"title":"Reply to correspondence \"Mortality risk factors in patients receiving ECPR after cardiac arrest\".","authors":"Zhe Li, Feilong Hei","doi":"10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.014","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":55536,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142967398","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Treatment experience and motivation to change in positive emergency department substance use screens and acute overdoses. 急诊科药物使用筛查阳性和急性过量的治疗经验和改变动机。
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.013
Sydney Habermann, Mana Sheykhsoltan, Maryann Mazer-Amirshahi, Christine Ramdin, Lewis S Nelson, Mihriye Mete
{"title":"Treatment experience and motivation to change in positive emergency department substance use screens and acute overdoses.","authors":"Sydney Habermann, Mana Sheykhsoltan, Maryann Mazer-Amirshahi, Christine Ramdin, Lewis S Nelson, Mihriye Mete","doi":"10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.013","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":55536,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142973439","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
American Journal of Emergency Medicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1