Pub Date : 2019-04-03DOI: 10.1080/10611975.2019.1740048
Tatiana Kasatkina
The Problem of Access to a Writer’s Philosophy and Theology: The Unavoidability of Philology. Apollon and the Mouse in F.M. Dostoevsky’s Notes from Underground Tat’iana Kasatkina To cite this article: Tat’iana Kasatkina (2019) The Problem of Access to a Writer’s Philosophy and Theology: The Unavoidability of Philology. Apollon and the Mouse in F.M. Dostoevsky’s Notesfrom Underground , Russian Studies in Literature, 55:2, 72-90, DOI: 10.1080/10611975.2019.1740048 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/10611975.2019.1740048
{"title":"The Problem of Access to a Writer’s Philosophy and Theology: The Unavoidability of Philology. Apollon and the Mouse in F.M. Dostoevsky’s Notes from Underground","authors":"Tatiana Kasatkina","doi":"10.1080/10611975.2019.1740048","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611975.2019.1740048","url":null,"abstract":"The Problem of Access to a Writer’s Philosophy and Theology: The Unavoidability of Philology. Apollon and the Mouse in F.M. Dostoevsky’s Notes from Underground Tat’iana Kasatkina To cite this article: Tat’iana Kasatkina (2019) The Problem of Access to a Writer’s Philosophy and Theology: The Unavoidability of Philology. Apollon and the Mouse in F.M. Dostoevsky’s Notesfrom Underground , Russian Studies in Literature, 55:2, 72-90, DOI: 10.1080/10611975.2019.1740048 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/10611975.2019.1740048","PeriodicalId":55621,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN LITERATURE","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10611975.2019.1740048","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48354642","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-04-03DOI: 10.1080/10611975.2019.1759318
Sibelan E. S. Forrester
{"title":"Introduction: Russian Classics","authors":"Sibelan E. S. Forrester","doi":"10.1080/10611975.2019.1759318","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611975.2019.1759318","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":55621,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN LITERATURE","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10611975.2019.1759318","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42638880","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-04-03DOI: 10.1080/10611975.2019.1740049
Irina Popova
{"title":"Literature and the Theory of Literature: The Development of the Russian Classics against the Backdrop of the European Tradition","authors":"Irina Popova","doi":"10.1080/10611975.2019.1740049","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611975.2019.1740049","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":55621,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN LITERATURE","volume":" 31","pages":"113-137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138518235","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-01-02DOI: 10.1080/10611975.2019.1622958
Iurii B. Orlitskii
Iurii Orlitskii outlines the emergence of anaphoric lines (typical of traditional Buryat and Mongolian poetry) in translations of that poetry in Russian. From there anaphoric lines have been taken up by Buryat poets writing in Russian; Orlitskii looks at three of them, Aleksei Ulanov and two younger poets, Bair Dugarov and Amarsana Ulzytaev. The article includes a number of wonderful poetic examples of the technique.
{"title":"Who Is “Unifying Heads” and Why? (Buryat Anaphoric Poetry in Russian)","authors":"Iurii B. Orlitskii","doi":"10.1080/10611975.2019.1622958","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611975.2019.1622958","url":null,"abstract":"Iurii Orlitskii outlines the emergence of anaphoric lines (typical of traditional Buryat and Mongolian poetry) in translations of that poetry in Russian. From there anaphoric lines have been taken up by Buryat poets writing in Russian; Orlitskii looks at three of them, Aleksei Ulanov and two younger poets, Bair Dugarov and Amarsana Ulzytaev. The article includes a number of wonderful poetic examples of the technique.","PeriodicalId":55621,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN LITERATURE","volume":"55 1","pages":"51 - 62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10611975.2019.1622958","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46067300","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-01-02DOI: 10.1080/10611975.2019.1622959
V. Shubinskii
When well-known poet Yevgeny Yevtushenko died in 2017, a number of obituaries appeared in Russia and abroad. This one argues that the poet is important not so much for his poetry, but for the record it gives of the feelings and ambitions of people in his time.
{"title":"Memory of the Former Future: Yevgeny Yevtushenko Has Died","authors":"V. Shubinskii","doi":"10.1080/10611975.2019.1622959","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611975.2019.1622959","url":null,"abstract":"When well-known poet Yevgeny Yevtushenko died in 2017, a number of obituaries appeared in Russia and abroad. This one argues that the poet is important not so much for his poetry, but for the record it gives of the feelings and ambitions of people in his time.","PeriodicalId":55621,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN LITERATURE","volume":"55 1","pages":"63 - 67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10611975.2019.1622959","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47615288","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-01-02DOI: 10.1080/10611975.2019.1622957
Andrei Ar’ev
In this longer version of the article originally identified for publication, Andrei Ar’ev discusses the biography, creative philosophy, and poetry of Aleksandr Kushner, one of the most prominent and important living Russian poets. Ar’ev puts Kushner’s work in the context of other poets, especially those of the same generation (born around 1940, including Joseph Brodsky) but finds that he is sui generis and creatively original.
Andrei Ar 'ev在这篇较长版本的文章中讨论了亚历山大·库什纳(Aleksandr Kushner)的传记、创作哲学和诗歌,库什纳是俄罗斯最杰出、最重要的诗人之一。阿尔耶夫把库什纳的作品放在其他诗人的背景下,尤其是同一代诗人(出生于1940年左右,包括约瑟夫·布罗茨基),但发现他是自成一体的,有创造性的原创。
{"title":"At a Poem’s Distance (The Poetry of Aleksandr Kushner)","authors":"Andrei Ar’ev","doi":"10.1080/10611975.2019.1622957","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611975.2019.1622957","url":null,"abstract":"In this longer version of the article originally identified for publication, Andrei Ar’ev discusses the biography, creative philosophy, and poetry of Aleksandr Kushner, one of the most prominent and important living Russian poets. Ar’ev puts Kushner’s work in the context of other poets, especially those of the same generation (born around 1940, including Joseph Brodsky) but finds that he is sui generis and creatively original.","PeriodicalId":55621,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN LITERATURE","volume":"55 1","pages":"50 - 8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10611975.2019.1622957","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44729207","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-01-02DOI: 10.1080/10611975.2019.1622956
Maria M. Stepanova
Grigorii Dashevskii (1964-2013) was a poet, translator, and literary critic. In this obituary from the Russian newspaper Kommersant, his friend and fellow poet Maria Stepanova describes him as a person and a creative personality.
{"title":"Our Sun: Grigorii Dashevskii Has Died","authors":"Maria M. Stepanova","doi":"10.1080/10611975.2019.1622956","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611975.2019.1622956","url":null,"abstract":"Grigorii Dashevskii (1964-2013) was a poet, translator, and literary critic. In this obituary from the Russian newspaper Kommersant, his friend and fellow poet Maria Stepanova describes him as a person and a creative personality.","PeriodicalId":55621,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN LITERATURE","volume":"55 1","pages":"4 - 7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10611975.2019.1622956","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45421297","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-10-02DOI: 10.1080/10611975.2019.1622953
Mikhail Aizenberg
This first part of a two-part publication holds four presentations from a roundtable on the poetry and continuing influence of Osip Mandelstam (1891-1938), with presentations by Mikhail Aizenberg, Vladimir Aristov, Leonid Vidgof and Konstantin Komarov. Aizenberg discusses the rising reputation of Mandelstam in the last three decades of the Soviet era; Aristov raises “problems and lessons” of Mandelstam, often in a transnational literary context; Vidgof addresses what makes Mandelstam “contemporary” to this day, particularly as a Jewish poet; Komarov briefly considers the “dreadful providentialism” of Mandelstam’s writing and the connections of his work to poets who are writing now.
{"title":"“It’s Time You Knew: I’m a Contemporary, Too … ”","authors":"Mikhail Aizenberg","doi":"10.1080/10611975.2019.1622953","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611975.2019.1622953","url":null,"abstract":"This first part of a two-part publication holds four presentations from a roundtable on the poetry and continuing influence of Osip Mandelstam (1891-1938), with presentations by Mikhail Aizenberg, Vladimir Aristov, Leonid Vidgof and Konstantin Komarov. Aizenberg discusses the rising reputation of Mandelstam in the last three decades of the Soviet era; Aristov raises “problems and lessons” of Mandelstam, often in a transnational literary context; Vidgof addresses what makes Mandelstam “contemporary” to this day, particularly as a Jewish poet; Komarov briefly considers the “dreadful providentialism” of Mandelstam’s writing and the connections of his work to poets who are writing now.","PeriodicalId":55621,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN LITERATURE","volume":"54 1","pages":"241 - 258"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10611975.2019.1622953","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41567114","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-10-02DOI: 10.1080/10611975.2019.1622954
E. Abdullaev
This second group of presentations from the roundtable on Mandelstam organized by the journal Znamia includes pieces by Evgenii Abdullaev, Grigorii Kruzhkov, Boris Kutenkov, and Aleksandr Kushner. Abdullaev discusses Mandelstam’s attitude toward the Russian Empire and especially its Soviet incarnation, noting the poet’s relationship to the very traits of the state that eventually made it deadly to him. Kruzhkov uses a nearly contemporaneous poem by Robert Frost to elicit the significance of Mandelstam’s important poem on Lamarck. Kutenkov discusses the relationship between biographical details and Mandelstam’s poetic work, often finding tightly related examples. Kushner imagines Mandelstam chatting with Nikolai Nekrasov (1821-1878) in the afterlife where poets all get to meet; the creative conversation he offers reveals an understudied subtext of Mandelstam’s work. Many quotations from poems by Mandelstam and others are not identified throughout this section; the poets use these intertextual references in ways that recall Mandelstam’s own comparison of a citation to the ringing call of a cicada.
{"title":"The Poet and the Empire","authors":"E. Abdullaev","doi":"10.1080/10611975.2019.1622954","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611975.2019.1622954","url":null,"abstract":"This second group of presentations from the roundtable on Mandelstam organized by the journal Znamia includes pieces by Evgenii Abdullaev, Grigorii Kruzhkov, Boris Kutenkov, and Aleksandr Kushner. Abdullaev discusses Mandelstam’s attitude toward the Russian Empire and especially its Soviet incarnation, noting the poet’s relationship to the very traits of the state that eventually made it deadly to him. Kruzhkov uses a nearly contemporaneous poem by Robert Frost to elicit the significance of Mandelstam’s important poem on Lamarck. Kutenkov discusses the relationship between biographical details and Mandelstam’s poetic work, often finding tightly related examples. Kushner imagines Mandelstam chatting with Nikolai Nekrasov (1821-1878) in the afterlife where poets all get to meet; the creative conversation he offers reveals an understudied subtext of Mandelstam’s work. Many quotations from poems by Mandelstam and others are not identified throughout this section; the poets use these intertextual references in ways that recall Mandelstam’s own comparison of a citation to the ringing call of a cicada.","PeriodicalId":55621,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN LITERATURE","volume":"54 1","pages":"259 - 275"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10611975.2019.1622954","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41869112","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}