Background: The prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is increasing and strongly associated with the metabolic syndrome, especially with obesity. A subtype, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), might progress to advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis. NASH patients have an increased all-cause mortality. First and foremost are malignancies, followed by cardiovascular diseases.
Summary: The NAFLD fibrosis score and noninvasive liver stiffness measurement (transient hepatic elastography) are essential components for the diagnostic risk assessment of NAFLD patients. Other steatoses (alcohol, genetic disorders, drugs, toxins, malnutrition, etc.) must be considered in the differential diagnosis. So far, there is no approved liver-specific drug therapy with a proven effect on NAFLD for patients without diabetes mellitus. Obeticholic acid (FXR agonist), cenicriviroc (a dual inhibitor of the chemokine receptors (CCR), CCR2 and CCR5), acetyl-CoA carboxylase inhibitors, and several thyroid hormone analogs are the most advanced substances in clinical development in ongoing phase 2 and 3 studies.
Key messages: Weight loss, physical training, and the screening and treatment of risk factors represent the cornerstones of NAFLD therapy. Treatment with glucagon-like peptide 1 analogs (e.g., liraglutide, semaglutide) and sodium-dependent glucose transporter 2 inhibitors can be recommended in patients with diabetes and NASH.
{"title":"Diagnostic and Therapy of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Narrative Review.","authors":"Elke Roeb","doi":"10.1159/000519611","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000519611","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is increasing and strongly associated with the metabolic syndrome, especially with obesity. A subtype, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), might progress to advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis. NASH patients have an increased all-cause mortality. First and foremost are malignancies, followed by cardiovascular diseases.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The NAFLD fibrosis score and noninvasive liver stiffness measurement (transient hepatic elastography) are essential components for the diagnostic risk assessment of NAFLD patients. Other steatoses (alcohol, genetic disorders, drugs, toxins, malnutrition, etc.) must be considered in the differential diagnosis. So far, there is no approved liver-specific drug therapy with a proven effect on NAFLD for patients without diabetes mellitus. Obeticholic acid (FXR agonist), cenicriviroc (a dual inhibitor of the chemokine receptors (CCR), CCR2 and CCR5), acetyl-CoA carboxylase inhibitors, and several thyroid hormone analogs are the most advanced substances in clinical development in ongoing phase 2 and 3 studies.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>Weight loss, physical training, and the screening and treatment of risk factors represent the cornerstones of NAFLD therapy. Treatment with glucagon-like peptide 1 analogs (e.g., liraglutide, semaglutide) and sodium-dependent glucose transporter 2 inhibitors can be recommended in patients with diabetes and NASH.</p>","PeriodicalId":56003,"journal":{"name":"Visceral Medicine","volume":"38 2","pages":"126-132"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9082206/pdf/vis-0038-0126.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9227251","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Shahab Hajibandeh, Shahin Hajibandeh, Karim Hassan, Sumera Baloch, Thomas Satyadas
Dear Editor, Visceral Medicine has recently published interesting articles on treatment strategies for improving outcomes in patients with Klatskin tumour [1–4]. We have a particular interest in these articles as we have systematically been reviewing the literature on outcomes of portal vein resection (PVR) in patients with Klatskin tumour undergoing curative surgical resection. Considering that Klatskin tumour has been the focus of recently published articles in Visceral Medicine, we recognized this as a great opportunity to discuss our findings. Klatskin tumour is a rare tumour with an annual incidence of 1 in 100,000 [5]. It accounts for up to 60% of cholangiocarcinomas [6]. Complete surgical resection with achievement of negative resection margins remains the only curative treatment [1]. However, longitudinal intraductal tumour extension and the risk of vascular encasement associated with Klatskin tumour would make achievement of negative resection margins challenging. Consequently, there have been ongoing efforts to identify appropriate surgical strategies targeting achievement of negative resection margins in cases with Klatskin tumour. Considering that the portal vein is involved (microscopically and macroscopically) in a conspicuous proportion of patients with Klatskin tumour [7], routine PVR during surgical resection of Klatskin tumour has been recommended by some authors for achievement of negative resection margins [8–10]. Nevertheless, because PVR is technically challenging and may be associated with significant morbidity and mortality, its routine use has been controversial. Two meta-analyses have previously compared outcomes of PVR and no PVR in patients with Klatskin tumour [11, 12]. However, most of the included studies in previous meta-analyses did not provide data on baseline characteristics of their included population. Knowledge about the baseline characteristics of patients undergoing curative surgery with PVR in comparison with those undergoing curative surgery without PVR is crucial to make meaningful conclusions.
{"title":"Confounding by Indication Is a Major Issue in the Available Evidence on Role of Portal Vein Resection in Patients Undergoing Curative Surgery for Klatskin Tumour.","authors":"Shahab Hajibandeh, Shahin Hajibandeh, Karim Hassan, Sumera Baloch, Thomas Satyadas","doi":"10.1159/000517690","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000517690","url":null,"abstract":"Dear Editor, Visceral Medicine has recently published interesting articles on treatment strategies for improving outcomes in patients with Klatskin tumour [1–4]. We have a particular interest in these articles as we have systematically been reviewing the literature on outcomes of portal vein resection (PVR) in patients with Klatskin tumour undergoing curative surgical resection. Considering that Klatskin tumour has been the focus of recently published articles in Visceral Medicine, we recognized this as a great opportunity to discuss our findings. Klatskin tumour is a rare tumour with an annual incidence of 1 in 100,000 [5]. It accounts for up to 60% of cholangiocarcinomas [6]. Complete surgical resection with achievement of negative resection margins remains the only curative treatment [1]. However, longitudinal intraductal tumour extension and the risk of vascular encasement associated with Klatskin tumour would make achievement of negative resection margins challenging. Consequently, there have been ongoing efforts to identify appropriate surgical strategies targeting achievement of negative resection margins in cases with Klatskin tumour. Considering that the portal vein is involved (microscopically and macroscopically) in a conspicuous proportion of patients with Klatskin tumour [7], routine PVR during surgical resection of Klatskin tumour has been recommended by some authors for achievement of negative resection margins [8–10]. Nevertheless, because PVR is technically challenging and may be associated with significant morbidity and mortality, its routine use has been controversial. Two meta-analyses have previously compared outcomes of PVR and no PVR in patients with Klatskin tumour [11, 12]. However, most of the included studies in previous meta-analyses did not provide data on baseline characteristics of their included population. Knowledge about the baseline characteristics of patients undergoing curative surgery with PVR in comparison with those undergoing curative surgery without PVR is crucial to make meaningful conclusions.","PeriodicalId":56003,"journal":{"name":"Visceral Medicine","volume":"38 2","pages":"133-136"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000517690","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9227252","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Beate Rau, Linda Feldbrügge, Felix Gronau, Miguel Enrique Alberto Vilchez, Peter Thuss-Patience, Pierre Emmanuel Bonnot, Olivier Glehen
Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is associated with a poor prognosis mostly due to peritoneal metastasis, which will develop in time during the patient's disease history. To prevent and treat peritoneal metastasis, different kinds of treatment regimens have been described.
Summary: In this review, we addressed two main topics - prophylaxis and treatment of peritoneal metastasis in GC. Prevention should be directed towards diminishing cancer cell spillage and reducing adherence of cancer cells to the abdominal cavity. Postoperative washing of the abdomen with or without chemotherapy and additional heat are herein discussed.
Key messages: Treatment of existing peritoneal metastasis is effective in patients with limited disease and tumour spread. Cytoreductive surgery including resection of peritoneal metastasis followed directly with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy can increase overall survival and progression-free survival in selected patients. Drugs, duration and time schedules of intraperitoneal chemotherapy are reviewed and presented. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy seems to improve the prognosis of patients with GC and peritoneal metastasis after complete resection of both primary and metastatic tumours.
{"title":"Indication of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Gastric Cancer (Gastripec, Gastrichip).","authors":"Beate Rau, Linda Feldbrügge, Felix Gronau, Miguel Enrique Alberto Vilchez, Peter Thuss-Patience, Pierre Emmanuel Bonnot, Olivier Glehen","doi":"10.1159/000522604","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000522604","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastric cancer (GC) is associated with a poor prognosis mostly due to peritoneal metastasis, which will develop in time during the patient's disease history. To prevent and treat peritoneal metastasis, different kinds of treatment regimens have been described.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>In this review, we addressed two main topics - prophylaxis and treatment of peritoneal metastasis in GC. Prevention should be directed towards diminishing cancer cell spillage and reducing adherence of cancer cells to the abdominal cavity. Postoperative washing of the abdomen with or without chemotherapy and additional heat are herein discussed.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>Treatment of existing peritoneal metastasis is effective in patients with limited disease and tumour spread. Cytoreductive surgery including resection of peritoneal metastasis followed directly with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy can increase overall survival and progression-free survival in selected patients. Drugs, duration and time schedules of intraperitoneal chemotherapy are reviewed and presented. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy seems to improve the prognosis of patients with GC and peritoneal metastasis after complete resection of both primary and metastatic tumours.</p>","PeriodicalId":56003,"journal":{"name":"Visceral Medicine","volume":"38 2","pages":"81-89"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9082209/pdf/vis-0038-0081.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9227249","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Integration of Cytoreductive Surgery and Perioperative Chemotherapy into the Multidisciplinary Management of Intra-Abdominal Cancer.","authors":"Paul H Sugarbaker","doi":"10.1159/000522605","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000522605","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":56003,"journal":{"name":"Visceral Medicine","volume":"38 2","pages":"79-80"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9082172/pdf/vis-0038-0079.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9227250","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
B. Rau, O. Glehen, P. Sugarbaker, M. H. Choudry, Y. Yonemura, D. Morris, S. Stintzing, D. Ryan
aDepartment of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte/Campus Virchow Klinikum CCM/CVK, Berlin, Germany; bDepartment of Surgical Oncology, CHU Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; cProgram in Peritoneal Surface Malignancy, Washington Cancer Institute, Washington, DC, USA; dDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; eDivision of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; fRegional Cancer Therapies, Peritoneal Surface Metastasis Center, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, Kishiwada, Japan; gAsian School of Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Treatment, Osaka, Japan; hDepartment of Surgery, Peritonectomy Unit, St George Hospital & University of New South Wales, Kogarah, NSW, Australia; iDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CCM), Charité – Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; jMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA; kHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Received: February 15, 2022 Accepted: February 22, 2022 Published online: March 8, 2022
a德国柏林CharitéMitte校区/Virchow Klinikum CCM/CVK校区外科;b外科肿瘤科,CHU Lyon Sud,Hospices Civils de Lyon,法国里昂;美国华盛顿癌症研究所腹膜表面恶性肿瘤cProgram;d美国宾夕法尼亚州匹兹堡匹兹堡大学医学院外科;e外科肿瘤科,匹兹堡大学医学中心,希尔曼癌症中心,匹兹堡,美国宾夕法尼亚州;日本Kishiwada Tokushukai医院腹膜表面转移中心癌症区域治疗;g亚洲腹膜表面恶性肿瘤治疗学院,日本大阪;h澳大利亚新南威尔士州科加拉市圣乔治医院和新南威尔士大学腹膜切除科外科;i德国柏林Charité–Universitaetsmedizin,柏林,血液学、肿瘤学和癌症免疫学(CCM)系;马萨诸塞州癌症中心马萨诸塞州总医院,波士顿,美国;哈佛医学院,美国马萨诸塞州波士顿接收时间:2022年2月15日接受时间:2022月22日在线发布时间:2021年3月8日
{"title":"Continuing Progress in the Interdisciplinary Management of Peritoneal Metastases","authors":"B. Rau, O. Glehen, P. Sugarbaker, M. H. Choudry, Y. Yonemura, D. Morris, S. Stintzing, D. Ryan","doi":"10.1159/000523760","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000523760","url":null,"abstract":"aDepartment of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte/Campus Virchow Klinikum CCM/CVK, Berlin, Germany; bDepartment of Surgical Oncology, CHU Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; cProgram in Peritoneal Surface Malignancy, Washington Cancer Institute, Washington, DC, USA; dDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; eDivision of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; fRegional Cancer Therapies, Peritoneal Surface Metastasis Center, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, Kishiwada, Japan; gAsian School of Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Treatment, Osaka, Japan; hDepartment of Surgery, Peritonectomy Unit, St George Hospital & University of New South Wales, Kogarah, NSW, Australia; iDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CCM), Charité – Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; jMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA; kHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Received: February 15, 2022 Accepted: February 22, 2022 Published online: March 8, 2022","PeriodicalId":56003,"journal":{"name":"Visceral Medicine","volume":"38 1","pages":"120 - 125"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2022-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47491814","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Henrik Nienhüser, Markus W Büchler, Martin Schneider
Background: Recurrence after resection of pancreatic cancer occurs in up to 80% of patients in the first 2 years after complete resection. While most patients are not eligible for surgical treatment due to disseminated disease, a certain group of patients can be evaluated for re-resection of local recurrence. This review summarizes the current literature on surgical treatment of recurrent pancreatic cancer and potential prognostic factors.
Summary: Re-resection of recurrent pancreatic cancer provides a significant survival benefit to selected patients with acceptable procedure-related mortality. Median overall survival after re-resection of recurrent pancreatic cancer is up to 28 months. The most relevant clinical parameters associated with a prognostic benefit are young patient age (<65 years), time to initial resection (>10 months), and preoperative chemotherapy before re-resection. Molecular markers are currently under investigation and might help to improve patient selection in the future.
Key message: Re-resection of recurrent pancreatic cancer is safe and feasible in experienced hands. Selected patients benefit from surgical treatment, but future studies are needed to identify reliable prognostic markers predicting survival.
{"title":"Resection of Recurrent Pancreatic Cancer: Who Can Benefit?","authors":"Henrik Nienhüser, Markus W Büchler, Martin Schneider","doi":"10.1159/000519754","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000519754","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recurrence after resection of pancreatic cancer occurs in up to 80% of patients in the first 2 years after complete resection. While most patients are not eligible for surgical treatment due to disseminated disease, a certain group of patients can be evaluated for re-resection of local recurrence. This review summarizes the current literature on surgical treatment of recurrent pancreatic cancer and potential prognostic factors.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Re-resection of recurrent pancreatic cancer provides a significant survival benefit to selected patients with acceptable procedure-related mortality. Median overall survival after re-resection of recurrent pancreatic cancer is up to 28 months. The most relevant clinical parameters associated with a prognostic benefit are young patient age (<65 years), time to initial resection (>10 months), and preoperative chemotherapy before re-resection. Molecular markers are currently under investigation and might help to improve patient selection in the future.</p><p><strong>Key message: </strong>Re-resection of recurrent pancreatic cancer is safe and feasible in experienced hands. Selected patients benefit from surgical treatment, but future studies are needed to identify reliable prognostic markers predicting survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":56003,"journal":{"name":"Visceral Medicine","volume":"38 1","pages":"42-48"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8874245/pdf/vis-0038-0042.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10595534","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Annika Rühle, Adrian T Billeter, Beat P Müller-Stich
Background: Obesity and metabolic disorders as type 2 diabetes (T2D), nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) or better called metabolic dysfunction fatty liver disease (MAFLD), arterial hypertension (AHT), and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) show a rising prevalence. The increased cardiovascular risk is one of the main causes for death of obese, metabolic ill patients. Sustainable and efficient therapeutic options are needed.
Summary: Metabolic surgery not only permits a substantial and lasting weight loss but also ameliorates metabolic co-morbidities and reduces cardiovascular risk and mortality of obese patients. Most existing data focused on T2D, but evidence for other metabolic co-morbidities such as NAFLD, AHT, and OSAS increase constantly. After metabolic surgery, glycemic control of diabetic patients is superior compared to conservative treatment. Also, diabetes related micro- and macrovascular complications are reduced after surgery, and the median life expectancy is over 9 years longer. In patients with MAFLD, metabolic surgery leads to reduction of steatosis and fibrosis while the risk to develop a hepatocellular carcinoma is reduced significantly. Patients with OSAS have an improved lung function and continuous pressure airway treatment during the night is unnecessary in many patients. Patients with AHT need significantly less or even no antihypertensive medication after surgery and the hazard ratio of death is reduced by 49.2%. Therefore, the focus in treating obese and metabolic ill patients is no longer on pure weight loss but on improvement of co-morbidities and reduction of mortality. This is reflected by the updated S3-guidelines of 2018 that provide nationally established consistent guidelines with clear indications for metabolic surgery no longer focusing on body mass index (BMI) only. This article aims to give an overview over the existing literature concerning surgical treatment options for metabolic syndrome.
Key messages: Metabolic co-morbidities impact life-quality and life expectancy of obese patients. Metabolic surgery offers the chance to treat those metabolic co-morbidities independently of the preoperative BMI and should be considered early as a treatment option for obese patients.
{"title":"Metabolic Surgery: Paradigm Shift in Metabolic Syndrome/Diabetes Therapy.","authors":"Annika Rühle, Adrian T Billeter, Beat P Müller-Stich","doi":"10.1159/000521707","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000521707","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obesity and metabolic disorders as type 2 diabetes (T2D), nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) or better called metabolic dysfunction fatty liver disease (MAFLD), arterial hypertension (AHT), and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) show a rising prevalence. The increased cardiovascular risk is one of the main causes for death of obese, metabolic ill patients. Sustainable and efficient therapeutic options are needed.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Metabolic surgery not only permits a substantial and lasting weight loss but also ameliorates metabolic co-morbidities and reduces cardiovascular risk and mortality of obese patients. Most existing data focused on T2D, but evidence for other metabolic co-morbidities such as NAFLD, AHT, and OSAS increase constantly. After metabolic surgery, glycemic control of diabetic patients is superior compared to conservative treatment. Also, diabetes related micro- and macrovascular complications are reduced after surgery, and the median life expectancy is over 9 years longer. In patients with MAFLD, metabolic surgery leads to reduction of steatosis and fibrosis while the risk to develop a hepatocellular carcinoma is reduced significantly. Patients with OSAS have an improved lung function and continuous pressure airway treatment during the night is unnecessary in many patients. Patients with AHT need significantly less or even no antihypertensive medication after surgery and the hazard ratio of death is reduced by 49.2%. Therefore, the focus in treating obese and metabolic ill patients is no longer on pure weight loss but on improvement of co-morbidities and reduction of mortality. This is reflected by the updated S3-guidelines of 2018 that provide nationally established consistent guidelines with clear indications for metabolic surgery no longer focusing on body mass index (BMI) only. This article aims to give an overview over the existing literature concerning surgical treatment options for metabolic syndrome.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>Metabolic co-morbidities impact life-quality and life expectancy of obese patients. Metabolic surgery offers the chance to treat those metabolic co-morbidities independently of the preoperative BMI and should be considered early as a treatment option for obese patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":56003,"journal":{"name":"Visceral Medicine","volume":"38 1","pages":"56-62"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8874241/pdf/vis-0038-0056.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10595535","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Carmen Mota Reyes, Alper Doğruöz, Rouzanna Istvanffy, Helmut Friess, Güralp O Ceyhan, Ihsan Ekin Demir
Background: The advent of next-generation sequencing technologies has enabled the identification of molecular subtypes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with different biological traits and clinically targetable features.
Summary: Although current chemotherapy trials are currently exploiting this knowledge, these molecular subtypes have not yet sufficiently caught the attention of surgeons. In fact, integration of these molecular subtypes into the timing of surgery can in theory improve patient outcome. Here, we present the molecular subtypes of PDAC from the surgeon's perspective and a clinically applicable algorithm that integrates the molecular subtyping of PDAC preoperatively into the decision of primary surgery versus neoadjuvant therapy. Furthermore, we point out the potential of "tailored" (in addition to conventional) neoadjuvant treatment for exploiting the molecular subtypes of PDAC.
Key messages: We believe that for surgeons, the preoperative knowledge on the subtype of PDAC can properly guide in deciding between upfront surgery versus neoadjuvant treatment for improving patient outcome.
{"title":"Molecular Profiling in Pancreatic Cancer: Current Role and Its Impact on Primary Surgery.","authors":"Carmen Mota Reyes, Alper Doğruöz, Rouzanna Istvanffy, Helmut Friess, Güralp O Ceyhan, Ihsan Ekin Demir","doi":"10.1159/000519755","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000519755","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The advent of next-generation sequencing technologies has enabled the identification of molecular subtypes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with different biological traits and clinically targetable features.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Although current chemotherapy trials are currently exploiting this knowledge, these molecular subtypes have not yet sufficiently caught the attention of surgeons. In fact, integration of these molecular subtypes into the timing of surgery can in theory improve patient outcome. Here, we present the molecular subtypes of PDAC from the surgeon's perspective and a clinically applicable algorithm that integrates the molecular subtyping of PDAC preoperatively into the decision of primary surgery versus neoadjuvant therapy. Furthermore, we point out the potential of \"tailored\" (in addition to conventional) neoadjuvant treatment for exploiting the molecular subtypes of PDAC.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>We believe that for surgeons, the preoperative knowledge on the subtype of PDAC can properly guide in deciding between upfront surgery versus neoadjuvant treatment for improving patient outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":56003,"journal":{"name":"Visceral Medicine","volume":"38 1","pages":"37-41"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8874240/pdf/vis-0038-0037.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10595533","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-02-01Epub Date: 2022-01-24DOI: 10.1159/000521419
Marko Kornmann, Alexander Kleger
{"title":"Editorial: Multimodality Treatment in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma - Current Options and the Future Impact of Molecular Biological Profiling.","authors":"Marko Kornmann, Alexander Kleger","doi":"10.1159/000521419","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000521419","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":56003,"journal":{"name":"Visceral Medicine","volume":"38 1","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8874236/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42824818","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}