Visceral Medicine最新文献

Background: Early colorectal cancer (eCRC) is defined as cancer that does not cross the submucosal layer of the colon or rectum, including carcinoma in situ (pTis), pT1a, and pT1b. Early carcinomas differ in their prognosis depending on the risk profile. The differentiation between low and high risk is essential. The low-risk group includes R0-resected, well (G1) or moderately (G2) differentiated tumors without lymphatic vessel invasion (L0), without blood vessel invasion (V0) and a tumor size ≤3 cm. In this constellation, the estimated risk of lymph node metastasis is around 1% or below. The high-risk group includes tumors with incomplete resection (Rx), poor (G3) or undifferentiated (G4) carcinomas, and/or lymphatic and blood vessel invasion (L1) and size ≥3 cm. In a "high-risk" situation, there is a risk for lymph node metastasis of up to 23%.

Summary: The incidence of eCRC is rising with a rate of 10% in all endoscopically removed lesions during colonoscopy. For a correct histological evaluation, all suspected lesions should be completely resected. In case of a pT1 lesion in the rectum, pelvic magnetic resonance imaging should be performed to evaluate for suspicious lymph nodes. The therapeutic approach for eCRC is based on histological assessment and ranges from endoscopic resection to radical oncological surgery. The advantages, disadvantages, and associated risks of the individual treatment strategy need to be carefully discussed on a tumor board and with the patient.

Key messages: Treatment options for early colorectal cancer depend on the histological assessment. Poorly differentiated carcinomas, a Kudo ≥ SM2 classified lesion, and a Haggitt level 4 always represent a "high-risk" situation. It should also be mentioned that in rectal cancer, local surgical tumor excision (full-wall excision) is also sufficient for pT1 carcinomas with a "low-risk" constellation (G1/G2; L0, size <3 cm) and an R0 resection.

Background: Approximately 5% of colorectal cancers (CRCs) are associated with hereditary cancer syndromes. The natural history of these syndromes differs from sporadic cancers, and due to their increased risk of metachronous carcinomas, surgical approaches also differ. This review focuses on the current recommendations for surgical treatment and what evidence has led to these recommendations in the most clinically relevant hereditary CRC syndromes: Lynch syndrome (LS) and (attenuated) familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP).

Summary: LS has no common phenotype and is caused by individual germline variants in one of the mismatch repair genes (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, or PMS2). Because each gene is associated with a different risk of metachronous cancer, guidelines now differentiate between genes in their recommendations for oncology interventions. Classical and attenuated FAP are caused by germline mutations in the APC gene and have a characteristic phenotype. Although correlations exist between phenotype and genotype, the indication for surgery is predominantly based on clinical manifestation rather than specific gene mutations.

Key message: Currently, the recommendation on the two diseases tends to go in opposite directions: while some forms of FAP may require less extensive surgery, in some LS patients, more sophisticated knowledge of metachronous carcinoma risk leads to more extensive surgery.