Background: While arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are preferred for hemodialysis access, the impact of prior central venous catheter (CVC) use on AVF outcomes and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) remain unclear. This study compared composite AVF non-use and complications between patients with prior CVC use and those with preemptive AVF creation over 24 months.
Methods: This prospective longitudinal study consecutively enrolled patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) referral for attended long-term vascular access planning consultations at two tertiary hospitals in northern Thailand (2016-2017). Eligible participants (⩾18 years) undergoing first-time AVF creation were categorized into CVC (first hemodialysis via CVC) and non-CVC (preemptive AVF) groups. Baseline characteristics were compared between groups. Multivariable logistic regression with backward stepwise selection identified predictors of composite AVF non-use in an exploratory analysis. Outcomes included composite AVF non-use (AVF non-use, hemodialysis suitability failure, and early mortality within 12 months), complications, and HRQoL.
Results: Among 167 patients (73 CVC, 94 non-CVC), AVF non-use at 12 months was significantly higher in the non-CVC group (32.9% vs 4.7%, p < 0.001), resulting in lower composite AVF non-use in the CVC group (19.2% vs 47.9%, p < 0.001). Each 1 mL/min/1.73 m² eGFR increase raised composite non-use risk by 7%, while prior CVC use reduced it by 22%. The CVC group had more symptomatic central vein stenosis (11.0% vs 3.2%, p = 0.060) but similar mortality rates. HRQoL improved physically in the CVC group by 18 months, with mental improvements in both groups by 24 months.
Conclusions: Prior CVC use was associated with lower AVF non-use, reflecting better timing of AVF creation based on established dialysis need rather than CVC benefits. High preemptive AVF non-use often resulted from delayed dialysis initiation or changing preferences. These findings support kidney failure risk prediction tools and individualized ESRD life-planning to optimize AVF timing. For patients requiring urgent dialysis initiation, sequential CVC-to-AVF management may represent clinically appropriate care. Optimal results require individualized timing, ongoing reassessment, and strong multidisciplinary coordination.
背景:虽然动静脉瘘(AVF)是首选的血液透析途径,但先前使用中心静脉导管(CVC)对AVF结局和健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的影响尚不清楚。本研究比较了24个月未使用复合AVF和未使用复合AVF的患者和预先使用AVF的患者之间的并发症。方法:本前瞻性纵向研究连续招募了2016-2017年在泰国北部两家三级医院参加长期血管通路规划咨询的慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)转诊患者。接受首次AVF创建的合格参与者(大于或等于18岁)被分类为CVC(通过CVC进行的首次血液透析)和非CVC(先发制人的AVF)组。比较两组间基线特征。在探索性分析中,多变量logistic回归与向后逐步选择确定了复合AVF不使用的预测因子。结果包括复合AVF未使用(AVF未使用、血液透析适宜性失败、12个月内早期死亡)、并发症和HRQoL。结果:167例患者(73例CVC, 94例非CVC)中,非CVC组12个月不使用AVF的比例显著高于非CVC组(32.9% vs 4.7%, p p p = 0.060),但死亡率相似。CVC组患者HRQoL生理改善18个月,两组患者精神改善24个月。结论:先前使用CVC与较低的AVF未使用相关,反映了基于确定的透析需求而不是CVC益处的AVF产生的更好时机。高先导性AVF不使用通常是由于透析开始延迟或偏好改变所致。这些发现支持肾衰竭风险预测工具和个体化ESRD生活规划来优化AVF时机。对于需要紧急透析的患者,序贯cvc - avf管理可能是临床适当的护理。最佳结果需要个性化的时间安排、持续的重新评估和强大的多学科协调。
{"title":"Arteriovenous fistula non-use: Insights from Thailand's healthcare experience.","authors":"Kochaphan Phirom, Amaraporn Rerkasem, Chanawit Sitthisombat, Supachok Maspakorn, Puntapong Taruangsri, Sasinat Pongtam, Kittipan Rerkasem","doi":"10.1177/11297298251396194","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298251396194","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are preferred for hemodialysis access, the impact of prior central venous catheter (CVC) use on AVF outcomes and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) remain unclear. This study compared composite AVF non-use and complications between patients with prior CVC use and those with preemptive AVF creation over 24 months.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective longitudinal study consecutively enrolled patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) referral for attended long-term vascular access planning consultations at two tertiary hospitals in northern Thailand (2016-2017). Eligible participants (⩾18 years) undergoing first-time AVF creation were categorized into CVC (first hemodialysis via CVC) and non-CVC (preemptive AVF) groups. Baseline characteristics were compared between groups. Multivariable logistic regression with backward stepwise selection identified predictors of composite AVF non-use in an exploratory analysis. Outcomes included composite AVF non-use (AVF non-use, hemodialysis suitability failure, and early mortality within 12 months), complications, and HRQoL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 167 patients (73 CVC, 94 non-CVC), AVF non-use at 12 months was significantly higher in the non-CVC group (32.9% vs 4.7%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), resulting in lower composite AVF non-use in the CVC group (19.2% vs 47.9%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Each 1 mL/min/1.73 m² eGFR increase raised composite non-use risk by 7%, while prior CVC use reduced it by 22%. The CVC group had more symptomatic central vein stenosis (11.0% vs 3.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.060) but similar mortality rates. HRQoL improved physically in the CVC group by 18 months, with mental improvements in both groups by 24 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prior CVC use was associated with lower AVF non-use, reflecting better timing of AVF creation based on established dialysis need rather than CVC benefits. High preemptive AVF non-use often resulted from delayed dialysis initiation or changing preferences. These findings support kidney failure risk prediction tools and individualized ESRD life-planning to optimize AVF timing. For patients requiring urgent dialysis initiation, sequential CVC-to-AVF management may represent clinically appropriate care. Optimal results require individualized timing, ongoing reassessment, and strong multidisciplinary coordination.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"11297298251396194"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145890555","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-04-17DOI: 10.1177/11297298251332043
Bharadhwaj Ravindhran, Milos Parovic, Tim Staniland, Arthur Jm Lim, Annabel Howitt, Shahani Nazir, Ross Lathan, Daniel Carradice, Ian C Chetter, George E Smith
Background: Clinical practice guidelines endorse arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) as the preferred form of vascular access. Despite recent advancements, concerns persist regarding variable AVF patency rates. This umbrella review aimed to evaluate and synthesize evidence on interventions and strategies associated with improved 12-month patency rates in AVF.
Methods: Systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized control trials (RCTs) providing data regarding primary patency (PP) and target-lesion primary patency (TLPP) of AVF (not grafts) were included. Covidence was used for screening and data extraction, while the AMSTAR-2 rating assessed the methodological quality. Credibility assessment followed Papatheodorou's criteria. Medline, EMBASE, CENTRAL and CINAHL were searched using a bespoke search strategy from inception to December 2024.
Results: Twenty-two reviews that included 136 RCTs involving 13,522 patients were included in the final review. Highly suggestive evidence supports functional end-to-side anastomosis (effect estimate (EE) 1.7) for improving PP. Drug-coated balloon angioplasty (DCB) showed varied results across nine reviews, with effect estimates ranging from 0.49 to 2.47. For TLPP, one review reported significant improvement (EE 2.47, 95% CI 1.53-3.99). Suggestive evidence favours flow-based access monitoring (RR 0.51-0.66), antithrombotic medication (EE 0.53), antiplatelet therapy (EE 0.54), far infrared therapy (EE 1.24-1.27) and pre-emptive correction of 'at-risk' AVF (EE 0.5) for prolonging PP. Button hole cannulation and side-to-side anastomosis showed mixed or non-significant results. Heterogeneity varied widely across reviews, ranging from 0% to 81%, and AMSTAR-2 ratings ranged from moderate to high.
Conclusion: This umbrella review synthesizes evidence on interventions for AVF patency, revealing varying levels of support for different strategies and highlighting areas requiring further investigation.
{"title":"Approaches to improve 12-month circuit primary patency and target lesion primary patency in arteriovenous fistulae: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.","authors":"Bharadhwaj Ravindhran, Milos Parovic, Tim Staniland, Arthur Jm Lim, Annabel Howitt, Shahani Nazir, Ross Lathan, Daniel Carradice, Ian C Chetter, George E Smith","doi":"10.1177/11297298251332043","DOIUrl":"10.1177/11297298251332043","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical practice guidelines endorse arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) as the preferred form of vascular access. Despite recent advancements, concerns persist regarding variable AVF patency rates. This umbrella review aimed to evaluate and synthesize evidence on interventions and strategies associated with improved 12-month patency rates in AVF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized control trials (RCTs) providing data regarding primary patency (PP) and target-lesion primary patency (TLPP) of AVF (not grafts) were included. Covidence was used for screening and data extraction, while the AMSTAR-2 rating assessed the methodological quality. Credibility assessment followed Papatheodorou's criteria. Medline, EMBASE, CENTRAL and CINAHL were searched using a bespoke search strategy from inception to December 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two reviews that included 136 RCTs involving 13,522 patients were included in the final review. Highly suggestive evidence supports functional end-to-side anastomosis (effect estimate (EE) 1.7) for improving PP. Drug-coated balloon angioplasty (DCB) showed varied results across nine reviews, with effect estimates ranging from 0.49 to 2.47. For TLPP, one review reported significant improvement (EE 2.47, 95% CI 1.53-3.99). Suggestive evidence favours flow-based access monitoring (RR 0.51-0.66), antithrombotic medication (EE 0.53), antiplatelet therapy (EE 0.54), far infrared therapy (EE 1.24-1.27) and pre-emptive correction of 'at-risk' AVF (EE 0.5) for prolonging PP. Button hole cannulation and side-to-side anastomosis showed mixed or non-significant results. Heterogeneity varied widely across reviews, ranging from 0% to 81%, and AMSTAR-2 ratings ranged from moderate to high.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This umbrella review synthesizes evidence on interventions for AVF patency, revealing varying levels of support for different strategies and highlighting areas requiring further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"63-71"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144060993","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-02-14DOI: 10.1177/11297298251320269
Amun G Hofmann
Background: This study investigates the relationship between national catheter use among hemodialysis (HD) patients and kidney transplantation (KTX) activity, exploring the hypothesis that higher KTX activity may be associated with increased catheter usage. The rationale is based on the idea that shorter waiting times for transplants in high-activity countries could make central venous catheters (CVCs) more favorable as a temporary bridge to transplantation compared to arteriovenous fistulas or grafts which require longer maturation times.
Methods: Nine national dialysis and transplant registries (Argentina, Australia, Austria, New Zealand, Portugal, Scotland, Sweden, USA, Turkey) were included in this analysis. The included descriptive analysis of baseline information from included countries, followed by crude association analyses using correlation and regression analyses to explore the relationship between CVC usage and kidney transplants per million inhabitants, considering relevant confounders. Adjusted analyses were performed to account for these confounders, providing a more nuanced understanding of the relationship.
Results: Data from nine different national registries was analyzed. CVC use and KTX activity had a weak to moderate positive correlation (r = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.07, 0.39). In all included countries CVC use increased over time. Adjusting for temporal patterns, country-specific factors, and the proportion of female HD patients, there was still strong evidence for a moderate increase of CVCs among prevalent HD patients with increasing KTX activity.
Conclusion: Higher national KTX activity is associated with a moderate increase in CVCs among prevalent HD patients.
{"title":"The association between national dialysis catheter use and kidney transplantation activity.","authors":"Amun G Hofmann","doi":"10.1177/11297298251320269","DOIUrl":"10.1177/11297298251320269","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study investigates the relationship between national catheter use among hemodialysis (HD) patients and kidney transplantation (KTX) activity, exploring the hypothesis that higher KTX activity may be associated with increased catheter usage. The rationale is based on the idea that shorter waiting times for transplants in high-activity countries could make central venous catheters (CVCs) more favorable as a temporary bridge to transplantation compared to arteriovenous fistulas or grafts which require longer maturation times.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nine national dialysis and transplant registries (Argentina, Australia, Austria, New Zealand, Portugal, Scotland, Sweden, USA, Turkey) were included in this analysis. The included descriptive analysis of baseline information from included countries, followed by crude association analyses using correlation and regression analyses to explore the relationship between CVC usage and kidney transplants per million inhabitants, considering relevant confounders. Adjusted analyses were performed to account for these confounders, providing a more nuanced understanding of the relationship.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from nine different national registries was analyzed. CVC use and KTX activity had a weak to moderate positive correlation (<i>r</i> = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.07, 0.39). In all included countries CVC use increased over time. Adjusting for temporal patterns, country-specific factors, and the proportion of female HD patients, there was still strong evidence for a moderate increase of CVCs among prevalent HD patients with increasing KTX activity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Higher national KTX activity is associated with a moderate increase in CVCs among prevalent HD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"120-130"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143426812","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Removal of totally implanted central venous access devices (brachial ports, chest-ports, femoral ports) is potentially associated with the risk of untoward events, some of them negligible (prolonged maneuver time due to technical difficulties), some relevant (hematoma), and some severe (embolization of catheter fragments into the circulation). The removal technique suitable for minimizing such complications has been described only in few manuals, but it has never been standardized. This paper describes a standardized protocol (SaRePo: Safe Removal of Ports) which consists of seven basic strategies to be adopted systematically during removal of totally implanted venous access devices, so to minimize the risk of adverse events. These strategies include: evaluation of the patient's history, preprocedural ultrasound scan of the veins, appropriate aseptic technique, proper local anesthesia, catheter extraction, removal of the reservoir from the pocket, closure of the surgical incision.
移除完全植入的中心静脉通路装置(肱口、胸口、股口)可能与不良事件的风险相关,其中一些可以忽略不计(由于技术困难而延长操作时间),一些相关(血肿),一些严重(导管碎片栓塞进入循环)。适合将此类并发症最小化的去除技术仅在少数手册中描述,但从未标准化。本文介绍了一种标准化的方案(SaRePo: Safe Removal of Ports),该方案由七个基本策略组成,在完全植入静脉通路装置的移除过程中系统地采用,以最大限度地减少不良事件的风险。这些策略包括:评估患者病史,术前静脉超声扫描,适当的无菌技术,适当的局部麻醉,拔管,从口袋中取出储液器,关闭手术切口。
{"title":"The SaRePo protocol: A seven-step strategy to minimize complications potentially related to the removal of totally implanted central venous access devices.","authors":"Maria Giuseppina Annetta, Fulvio Pinelli, Gloria Ortiz Miluy, Giancarlo Scoppettuolo, Mauro Pittiruti","doi":"10.1177/11297298251333863","DOIUrl":"10.1177/11297298251333863","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Removal of totally implanted central venous access devices (brachial ports, chest-ports, femoral ports) is potentially associated with the risk of untoward events, some of them negligible (prolonged maneuver time due to technical difficulties), some relevant (hematoma), and some severe (embolization of catheter fragments into the circulation). The removal technique suitable for minimizing such complications has been described only in few manuals, but it has never been standardized. This paper describes a standardized protocol (SaRePo: Safe Removal of Ports) which consists of seven basic strategies to be adopted systematically during removal of totally implanted venous access devices, so to minimize the risk of adverse events. These strategies include: evaluation of the patient's history, preprocedural ultrasound scan of the veins, appropriate aseptic technique, proper local anesthesia, catheter extraction, removal of the reservoir from the pocket, closure of the surgical incision.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"5-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144034204","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-05-14DOI: 10.1177/11297298251338968
Maria Giuseppina Annetta, Timothy R Spencer, Mauro Pittiruti
Two major innovations-ultrasound guidance and catheter tunneling-have transformed central venous catheterization, significantly reducing early and late complications. Ultrasound enables accurate vein selection based on anatomical and functional criteria, facilitates safer venipuncture, and broadens access to previously avoided veins (e.g. brachiocephalic, axillary). It also allows real-time guidance for wire direction, tip navigation, and the immediate diagnosis of complications. Tunneling, once exclusive to cuffed catheters, is now increasingly used for non-cuffed devices to optimize the exit site independently of the venipuncture site. This strategy reduces infection, thrombosis, and dislodgment risks by relocating exit from high-risk zones (e.g. groin, neck) to cleaner, more secure areas. Despite widespread adoption of these innovations, current guidelines often confuse puncture and exit sites, leading to outdated recommendations. For example, guidelines labeling femoral or jugular access as high-risk often fail to differentiate between venipuncture and exit locations. Ultrasound-guided femoral puncture with tunneling can yield low-thrombosis, low-infection configurations, especially with mid-thigh or abdominal exit sites. Similarly, supraclavicular puncture of the internal jugular vein with tunneling avoids the traditional high-neck exit and its associated complications. Recommendations promoting subclavian access are also problematic, as safe ultrasound access is often only feasible via supraclavicular routes, not by traditional blind infraclavicular approaches. The field must shift from old anatomical dogma to ultrasound-based, tunneled approaches tailored to each patients need. Clear distinction between venipuncture and exit sites is essential for modern, evidence-based vascular access practices.
{"title":"Puncture site versus exit site in central venous access procedures: Still a source of confusion.","authors":"Maria Giuseppina Annetta, Timothy R Spencer, Mauro Pittiruti","doi":"10.1177/11297298251338968","DOIUrl":"10.1177/11297298251338968","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Two major innovations-ultrasound guidance and catheter tunneling-have transformed central venous catheterization, significantly reducing early and late complications. Ultrasound enables accurate vein selection based on anatomical and functional criteria, facilitates safer venipuncture, and broadens access to previously avoided veins (e.g. brachiocephalic, axillary). It also allows real-time guidance for wire direction, tip navigation, and the immediate diagnosis of complications. Tunneling, once exclusive to cuffed catheters, is now increasingly used for non-cuffed devices to optimize the exit site independently of the venipuncture site. This strategy reduces infection, thrombosis, and dislodgment risks by relocating exit from high-risk zones (e.g. groin, neck) to cleaner, more secure areas. Despite widespread adoption of these innovations, current guidelines often confuse puncture and exit sites, leading to outdated recommendations. For example, guidelines labeling femoral or jugular access as high-risk often fail to differentiate between venipuncture and exit locations. Ultrasound-guided femoral puncture with tunneling can yield low-thrombosis, low-infection configurations, especially with mid-thigh or abdominal exit sites. Similarly, supraclavicular puncture of the internal jugular vein with tunneling avoids the traditional high-neck exit and its associated complications. Recommendations promoting subclavian access are also problematic, as safe ultrasound access is often only feasible via supraclavicular routes, not by traditional blind infraclavicular approaches. The field must shift from old anatomical dogma to ultrasound-based, tunneled approaches tailored to each patients need. Clear distinction between venipuncture and exit sites is essential for modern, evidence-based vascular access practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"33-38"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144036138","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-05-01DOI: 10.1177/11297298251334890
Ryszard Gawda, Tomasz Czarnik
Percutaneous arterial cannulation for arterial catheter placement is a commonly performed procedure in intensive care. In many cases routinely cannulated radial arteries may be inaccessible because of shock, arteriosclerosis, or vasoconstriction. In this scenario, femoral or axillary artery may be chosen for arterial catheter placement. Percutaneous cannulation of the axillary artery via the infraclavicular route has two main advantages over cannulation of the femoral artery: avoidance of cannulation of the artery affected by arteriosclerosis and microbiological safety by avoiding cannulation in the inguinal area. This paper describes ultrasound-guided, real-time infraclavicular cannulation of the axillary artery for arterial catheter placement in critically ill patients. The cannulation technique is described in a step-by-step manner. In addition, the limitations of this arterial approach are presented together with the indications and contraindications. The pitfalls that are likely to occur during cannulation via the infraclavicular route are also reviewed.
{"title":"Ultrasound-guided axillary artery cannulation in the infraclavicular area: A step-by-step approach.","authors":"Ryszard Gawda, Tomasz Czarnik","doi":"10.1177/11297298251334890","DOIUrl":"10.1177/11297298251334890","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Percutaneous arterial cannulation for arterial catheter placement is a commonly performed procedure in intensive care. In many cases routinely cannulated radial arteries may be inaccessible because of shock, arteriosclerosis, or vasoconstriction. In this scenario, femoral or axillary artery may be chosen for arterial catheter placement. Percutaneous cannulation of the axillary artery via the infraclavicular route has two main advantages over cannulation of the femoral artery: avoidance of cannulation of the artery affected by arteriosclerosis and microbiological safety by avoiding cannulation in the inguinal area. This paper describes ultrasound-guided, real-time infraclavicular cannulation of the axillary artery for arterial catheter placement in critically ill patients. The cannulation technique is described in a step-by-step manner. In addition, the limitations of this arterial approach are presented together with the indications and contraindications. The pitfalls that are likely to occur during cannulation via the infraclavicular route are also reviewed.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"304-310"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144013952","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-01-30DOI: 10.1177/11297298251313620
Abdalla Marei, Martin Hohls, Aristotelis Touloumtzidis, Marcus Katoh, Gabor Gäbel
A 66-year-old transfeminine patient presented to our institution with a central-venous stenosis causing dysfunction of her arteriovenous (AV) graft on her left arm. The patient was treated repeatedly, because of restenosis. Due to complete occlusion of the graft and subclavian vein as well as a liquid tumor located around the stenotic segment of the vein, we resected the left subclavian vein via a trap-door thoracotomy and inserted a PTFE-graft. Histological examination of the resected tissue identified metastasis from the urothelial carcinoma as the underlying cause of the stenosis. Malignant tumors are an infrequent etiology of AV-access dysfunction, and there are hardly any data on transgender patients. This case report provides an overview of the current data concerning these unique circumstances.
{"title":"Metastasis of an urothelial carcinoma as rare cause of an AV-graft dysfunction in a transgender patient.","authors":"Abdalla Marei, Martin Hohls, Aristotelis Touloumtzidis, Marcus Katoh, Gabor Gäbel","doi":"10.1177/11297298251313620","DOIUrl":"10.1177/11297298251313620","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A 66-year-old transfeminine patient presented to our institution with a central-venous stenosis causing dysfunction of her arteriovenous (AV) graft on her left arm. The patient was treated repeatedly, because of restenosis. Due to complete occlusion of the graft and subclavian vein as well as a liquid tumor located around the stenotic segment of the vein, we resected the left subclavian vein via a trap-door thoracotomy and inserted a PTFE-graft. Histological examination of the resected tissue identified metastasis from the urothelial carcinoma as the underlying cause of the stenosis. Malignant tumors are an infrequent etiology of AV-access dysfunction, and there are hardly any data on transgender patients. This case report provides an overview of the current data concerning these unique circumstances.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"326-331"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143069984","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-02-17DOI: 10.1177/11297298241313414
Nancy Moureau, Lois Kaufman
Evidence of the costly effects of first-attempt peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) insertion failures continues to mount. This study was conducted to determine if a unique catheter design can improve operative error, promote PIVC first-stick success and reduce the costs of first-attempt failures. In Phase One of this comparative simulation use in vitro study, 16 nurses from acute care hospitals inserted four PIVC types into a training model, each type characterized by distinct timing of flashback occurrence and needle design. Each nurse performed three attempts per catheter type (12 total per inserter). Insertions were video-recorded and analyzed for the effect of the needle on a vessel during insertion, double punctures and catheter placement failure or success. In Phase Two, 100 nurses and 25 purchasing agents nationwide identified items used and associated costs for PIVC insertions. In Phase One, nurses using a grooved needle flashback with a thin-tipped needle were 20% more successful with catheter placement than those using a notched needle flashback and 22% more successful than those placing a capillary flashback design. Catheter placement success with a grooved needle flashback was 15% higher than with a capillary flashback and 13% higher than with a notched needle flashback. Double punctures were highest among nurses using a capillary flashback catheter, and catheter placement failure was highest among nurses using notched needle flashback. In Phase Two, nurses reported an average of 51% first-attempt success. The authors calculated the estimated annual cost of first-stick failure to be $US 35,919.15 per nurse, including labor and materials used in the second and third attempts. In this study, the authors found the insertion technique with grooved flashback needle design reduced operative error, double punctures and improved first-attempt success. This flashback needle design could significantly improve patient outcomes, speed time to treatment and reduce hospital costs.
{"title":"Comparative study of peripheral intravenous catheter insertions with capillary, notched, and a grooved needle flashback design.","authors":"Nancy Moureau, Lois Kaufman","doi":"10.1177/11297298241313414","DOIUrl":"10.1177/11297298241313414","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evidence of the costly effects of first-attempt peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) insertion failures continues to mount. This study was conducted to determine if a unique catheter design can improve operative error, promote PIVC first-stick success and reduce the costs of first-attempt failures. In Phase One of this comparative simulation use in vitro study, 16 nurses from acute care hospitals inserted four PIVC types into a training model, each type characterized by distinct timing of flashback occurrence and needle design. Each nurse performed three attempts per catheter type (12 total per inserter). Insertions were video-recorded and analyzed for the effect of the needle on a vessel during insertion, double punctures and catheter placement failure or success. In Phase Two, 100 nurses and 25 purchasing agents nationwide identified items used and associated costs for PIVC insertions. In Phase One, nurses using a grooved needle flashback with a thin-tipped needle were 20% more successful with catheter placement than those using a notched needle flashback and 22% more successful than those placing a capillary flashback design. Catheter placement success with a grooved needle flashback was 15% higher than with a capillary flashback and 13% higher than with a notched needle flashback. Double punctures were highest among nurses using a capillary flashback catheter, and catheter placement failure was highest among nurses using notched needle flashback. In Phase Two, nurses reported an average of 51% first-attempt success. The authors calculated the estimated annual cost of first-stick failure to be $US 35,919.15 per nurse, including labor and materials used in the second and third attempts. In this study, the authors found the insertion technique with grooved flashback needle design reduced operative error, double punctures and improved first-attempt success. This flashback needle design could significantly improve patient outcomes, speed time to treatment and reduce hospital costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"151-161"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12812175/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143442994","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-02-12DOI: 10.1177/11297298251317568
Giovanni Rollo, Francesca Maria Silvestri, Giorgio Persano, Angela Mastronuzzi, Andrea Carai, Carlo Efisio Marras, Antonella Cacchione, Silvia Madafferi, Cristina Martucci, Simone Reali, Chiara Grimaldi, Gian Luigi Natali, Daniella Araiza Kelly, Alessandro Crocoli
Background and aims: Ventriculoatrial (VA) shunts are frequently used for hydrocephalus (HS) management when peritoneal catheter placement is inappropriate. Historically, open surgical cut-down (OSC) on the internal jugular vein has been the standard method for distal catheter insertion. In contrast, percutaneous Seldinger-type ultrasound-guided (USG) venipuncture offers advantages such as reduced operating times and lower postoperative pain. However, its use in pediatric patients is limited.
Methods: This study reviewed patients diagnosed with HS who underwent VA shunt procedures (OSC vs USG) at Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital from January 1, 2014, to February 29, 2024. The analysis focused on surgical times for VA shunt placements and associated neurosurgical operations, as well as catheter replacement rates.
Results: Thirteen patients (6 males, 7 females; median age 12 years, range 0.5-14.2) were enrolled, with a total of 23 procedures performed. The mean surgical time for distal VA placement using the USG technique was significantly shorter than for the OSC method (13.36 min vs 30.22 min, p = 0.00001). Conversely, neurosurgical operations performed using OSC had a 15-min reduction in average operative time compared to USG, though this difference was not statistically significant. Catheter replacement was required in 35.7% of the USG group compared to 55.5% in the OSC group (p = ns).
Conclusions: USG VA shunt placement demonstrates reduced operating times and lower perioperative complication rates compared to OSC. Our findings indicate that percutaneous VA shunts are technically simpler and do not necessitate specialized pediatric vascular surgery skills, enhancing their applicability in pediatric hydrocephalus management.
背景和目的:当腹膜导管放置不合适时,脑室-心房(VA)分流术经常用于脑积水(HS)的治疗。历史上,颈内静脉切开(OSC)一直是远端置管的标准方法。相比之下,经皮seldinger型超声引导(USG)静脉穿刺具有减少手术时间和减少术后疼痛等优点。然而,它在儿科患者中的应用是有限的。方法:本研究回顾了2014年1月1日至2024年2月29日在Bambino Gesù儿童医院接受VA分流术(OSC vs USG)诊断为HS的患者。分析的重点是VA分流器放置的手术时间和相关的神经外科手术,以及导管更换率。结果:13例患者(男6例,女7例;中位年龄12岁,范围0.5-14.2),共进行了23例手术。使用USG技术放置远端VA的平均手术时间明显短于OSC方法(13.36分钟vs 30.22分钟,p = 0.00001)。相反,与USG相比,使用OSC进行的神经外科手术平均手术时间减少了15分钟,尽管这种差异没有统计学意义。USG组中35.7%的患者需要更换导管,而OSC组为55.5% (p = ns)。结论:与OSC相比,USG置放VA分流术减少了手术时间,降低了围手术期并发症发生率。我们的研究结果表明,经皮VA分流术在技术上更简单,不需要专门的儿科血管手术技能,提高了其在儿童脑积水治疗中的适用性。
{"title":"Evaluation of ultrasound-guided distal catheter placement in pediatric ventriculoatrial shunts for patients with hydrocephalus: Effectiveness and consequences.","authors":"Giovanni Rollo, Francesca Maria Silvestri, Giorgio Persano, Angela Mastronuzzi, Andrea Carai, Carlo Efisio Marras, Antonella Cacchione, Silvia Madafferi, Cristina Martucci, Simone Reali, Chiara Grimaldi, Gian Luigi Natali, Daniella Araiza Kelly, Alessandro Crocoli","doi":"10.1177/11297298251317568","DOIUrl":"10.1177/11297298251317568","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Ventriculoatrial (VA) shunts are frequently used for hydrocephalus (HS) management when peritoneal catheter placement is inappropriate. Historically, open surgical cut-down (OSC) on the internal jugular vein has been the standard method for distal catheter insertion. In contrast, percutaneous Seldinger-type ultrasound-guided (USG) venipuncture offers advantages such as reduced operating times and lower postoperative pain. However, its use in pediatric patients is limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study reviewed patients diagnosed with HS who underwent VA shunt procedures (OSC vs USG) at Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital from January 1, 2014, to February 29, 2024. The analysis focused on surgical times for VA shunt placements and associated neurosurgical operations, as well as catheter replacement rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen patients (6 males, 7 females; median age 12 years, range 0.5-14.2) were enrolled, with a total of 23 procedures performed. The mean surgical time for distal VA placement using the USG technique was significantly shorter than for the OSC method (13.36 min vs 30.22 min, <i>p</i> = 0.00001). Conversely, neurosurgical operations performed using OSC had a 15-min reduction in average operative time compared to USG, though this difference was not statistically significant. Catheter replacement was required in 35.7% of the USG group compared to 55.5% in the OSC group (<i>p</i> = ns).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>USG VA shunt placement demonstrates reduced operating times and lower perioperative complication rates compared to OSC. Our findings indicate that percutaneous VA shunts are technically simpler and do not necessitate specialized pediatric vascular surgery skills, enhancing their applicability in pediatric hydrocephalus management.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"114-119"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12812172/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143400879","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The backflow phenomenon represents a challenge when using needleless connectors. This bench study investigated backflow volume (i.e. the quantifiable amount of backflow) into a long peripheral catheter by evaluating needleless connectors with four technologies (positive, negative, neutral, and anti-reflux) and three clamping sequences.
Methods: Four different connectors with varying displacement technologies were tested to assess backflow volume using the manufacturer's recommended clamping sequences and a sequence in which the clamp was not foreseen. A high-fidelity experimental model was used. Neutral and anti-reflux needleless connectors were evaluated with varying clamping sequences. The backflow volume values are presented as median and interquartile range.
Results: Backflow was observed in all cases, with a wide range of results: the lowest backflow volume was recorded with the anti-reflux connector, while the highest was recorded with the negative connector, both when no clamp was used. The clamp significantly reduced backflow volume in negative and positive connectors, while no differences were noted between neutral and anti-reflux types across the sequences.
Conclusion: Using only needleless connectors in long peripheral catheters does not prevent the backflow phenomenon. Using clamps significantly reduced the backflow volume in needleless connectors with positive and negative displacement. Neutral and anti-reflux connectors perform similarly in the clamping sequences with and without clamps.
{"title":"Effect of different needleless connector technologies on backflow volume in the long peripheral catheter: A bench study.","authors":"Davide Giustivi, Antonio Gidaro, Elisa Nardin, Silvia Revere, Stefania Fiorini, Nicolò Capsoni, Lucrezia Rovati, Daniele Privitera","doi":"10.1177/11297298251336805","DOIUrl":"10.1177/11297298251336805","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The backflow phenomenon represents a challenge when using needleless connectors. This bench study investigated backflow volume (<i>i.e.</i> the quantifiable amount of backflow) into a long peripheral catheter by evaluating needleless connectors with four technologies (positive, negative, neutral, and anti-reflux) and three clamping sequences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four different connectors with varying displacement technologies were tested to assess backflow volume using the manufacturer's recommended clamping sequences and a sequence in which the clamp was not foreseen. A high-fidelity experimental model was used. Neutral and anti-reflux needleless connectors were evaluated with varying clamping sequences. The backflow volume values are presented as median and interquartile range.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Backflow was observed in all cases, with a wide range of results: the lowest backflow volume was recorded with the anti-reflux connector, while the highest was recorded with the negative connector, both when no clamp was used. The clamp significantly reduced backflow volume in negative and positive connectors, while no differences were noted between neutral and anti-reflux types across the sequences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using only needleless connectors in long peripheral catheters does not prevent the backflow phenomenon. Using clamps significantly reduced the backflow volume in needleless connectors with positive and negative displacement. Neutral and anti-reflux connectors perform similarly in the clamping sequences with and without clamps.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"221-226"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144054935","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}