Background: Silicone Cuffed Centrally Inserted Central venous catheters (CICCs) were a type of catheters that have been used for a long time especially in cancer patients. Recently, thanks to biomedic research progresses, polyurethane catheters have resulted in higher surgical performances compared to classical silicone ones. Indeed, the inferior calibers of these new catheters lead to an extremely faster infusion rate. The presence of a valve at the tip of the catheter could suggest an impossible replacement procedure over a Seldinger guidewire.
Method: The aim of this article is to explain our replacement technique over guidewire of silicone cuffed and valved tunneled CICCs with a power injectable polyurethane cuffed tunneled CICC. The casistic presented was evaluated at the Vascular Access Unit of ASST Spedali Civili in Brescia, Italy. The study involved 35 successful catheter replacement over guidewire, meanwhile cases where patients presented sepsis, exit site infection, or catheter damage were premeditatedly excluded.
Results: The maneuver was always conducted following the same procedure without noticing particular complications associated with CICC insertion. Indeed, the operation was quick, feasible, and safe. Septic, thromboembolic, or hemorrhagic complications also related to patients presenting dysfunctional coagulation cascade were not encountered.
Conclusions: Our experience regarding the replacement technique of silicone cuffed and valved catheters over guidewire was considered feasible, accurate, and efficient for all patients treated, even in those presenting thrombocytopenia or a dysfunctional coagulation cascade.
{"title":"Guidewire replacement of valved tunneled-cuffed silicone catheters with power injectable polyurethane tunneled-cuffed catheters or with ports.","authors":"Stefano Benvenuti, Federico Finetti, Elena Porteri, Rosanna Ceresoli, Cristian Pintossi, Francesca Zanatta, Gabriele Bartolini, Federica Facchini, Caterina Annovazzi, Daniele Alberti","doi":"10.1177/11297298231218593","DOIUrl":"10.1177/11297298231218593","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Silicone Cuffed Centrally Inserted Central venous catheters (CICCs) were a type of catheters that have been used for a long time especially in cancer patients. Recently, thanks to biomedic research progresses, polyurethane catheters have resulted in higher surgical performances compared to classical silicone ones. Indeed, the inferior calibers of these new catheters lead to an extremely faster infusion rate. The presence of a valve at the tip of the catheter could suggest an impossible replacement procedure over a Seldinger guidewire.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The aim of this article is to explain our replacement technique over guidewire of silicone cuffed and valved tunneled CICCs with a power injectable polyurethane cuffed tunneled CICC. The casistic presented was evaluated at the Vascular Access Unit of ASST Spedali Civili in Brescia, Italy. The study involved 35 successful catheter replacement over guidewire, meanwhile cases where patients presented sepsis, exit site infection, or catheter damage were premeditatedly excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The maneuver was always conducted following the same procedure without noticing particular complications associated with CICC insertion. Indeed, the operation was quick, feasible, and safe. Septic, thromboembolic, or hemorrhagic complications also related to patients presenting dysfunctional coagulation cascade were not encountered.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our experience regarding the replacement technique of silicone cuffed and valved catheters over guidewire was considered feasible, accurate, and efficient for all patients treated, even in those presenting thrombocytopenia or a dysfunctional coagulation cascade.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"327-331"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139081089","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-01-02DOI: 10.1177/11297298231194859
Yuejiao Zhang, Ruiyi Zhao
Intracavitary electrocardiogram (IC-ECG) guidance is widely used for peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placement. The P wave variation has rarely been reported in persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC). Here, we report a PLSVC case of P wave variation in PICC placement guided by IC-ECG. In this case, the P wave variation of the PLSVC was quite different from that of the right superior vena cava (RSVC). The tip of the catheter was located at the lower segment of the left superior vena cava according to postoperative radiography examination. PICC functioned normally, and no complications occurred.
腔内心电图(IC-ECG)引导被广泛用于外周插入式中心导管(PICC)置管。P 波变异在持续性左上腔静脉(PLSVC)中很少见报道。在此,我们报告了一例在 IC-ECG 引导下置入 PICC 时出现 P 波变异的 PLSVC 病例。在该病例中,PLSVC 的 P 波变化与右上腔静脉(RSVC)的 P 波变化截然不同。根据术后的影像学检查,导管的顶端位于左上腔静脉的下段。PICC 运行正常,未出现并发症。
{"title":"Intracavitary electrocardiogram guidance for peripherally inserted central catheter placement in a patient with persistent left superior vena cava: A case report.","authors":"Yuejiao Zhang, Ruiyi Zhao","doi":"10.1177/11297298231194859","DOIUrl":"10.1177/11297298231194859","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intracavitary electrocardiogram (IC-ECG) guidance is widely used for peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placement. The P wave variation has rarely been reported in persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC). Here, we report a PLSVC case of P wave variation in PICC placement guided by IC-ECG. In this case, the P wave variation of the PLSVC was quite different from that of the right superior vena cava (RSVC). The tip of the catheter was located at the lower segment of the left superior vena cava according to postoperative radiography examination. PICC functioned normally, and no complications occurred.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"347-351"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139081126","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2023-11-07DOI: 10.1177/11297298231207125
Sara Ibáñez Pallarès, Vicent Esteve Simó, Irati Tapia González, Albert Clará Velasco, Manel Ramírez de Arellano Serna, Montserrat Yeste Campos
Introduction: Our objective is to describe the clinical characteristics and preoperative ultrasound mapping parameters associated with primary and secondary patency of radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistulas (RCF).
Methods: A retrospective, single-center, descriptive study, including patients undergoing a RCF creation between 2015 and 2019. Socio-demographic data and ultrasound parameters were collected and an analysis of primary and secondary patency was performed.
Results: Eighty-four patients were included in this study. Mean age was 65.6 (±13.9) years; 76.6% were male. Mean preoperative ultrasound parameters: forearm cephalic vein diameter was 2.8 (±0.57) mm, radial artery diameter was 2.6 (±0.42) mm, radial artery systolic peak velocity was 68 (±14.3) cm/s radial artery resistance index was 0.76 (±0.9). At the end of the 4 years the follow-up, the mean primary and secondary patency were 47.2% and 80% respectively. Only female sex was significantly associated with a decrease in both primary patency (p = 0.043, HR = 0.48) and secondary patency (p = 0.021, HR = 0.023). Furthermore, radial artery systolic peak velocity (p = 0.007, HR = 2.6) showed a significant association with decreased primary patency and forearm cephalic vein diameter showed a borderline significant association with decreased secondary patency (p = 0.046, HR = 8.2).
Conclusions: A standardized evaluation by a vascular surgeon or nephrologist represent a key in the preoperative assessment of AVF candidates. Based on our results, we will consider to avoid distal vascular access in both female patients with lower radial artery systolic peak velocity (less than 68 cm/s) and borderline forearm cephalic vein diameter (less than 2.8 mm) after initial assessment in our clinical practice. Our results could encourage new studies in order to stablish the potential role of these parameters in the RCFs patency rates.
{"title":"Clinical characteristics and preoperative ultrasound parameters related to low patency in radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistulas.","authors":"Sara Ibáñez Pallarès, Vicent Esteve Simó, Irati Tapia González, Albert Clará Velasco, Manel Ramírez de Arellano Serna, Montserrat Yeste Campos","doi":"10.1177/11297298231207125","DOIUrl":"10.1177/11297298231207125","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Our objective is to describe the clinical characteristics and preoperative ultrasound mapping parameters associated with primary and secondary patency of radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistulas (RCF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective, single-center, descriptive study, including patients undergoing a RCF creation between 2015 and 2019. Socio-demographic data and ultrasound parameters were collected and an analysis of primary and secondary patency was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-four patients were included in this study. Mean age was 65.6 (±13.9) years; 76.6% were male. Mean preoperative ultrasound parameters: forearm cephalic vein diameter was 2.8 (±0.57) mm, radial artery diameter was 2.6 (±0.42) mm, radial artery systolic peak velocity was 68 (±14.3) cm/s radial artery resistance index was 0.76 (±0.9). At the end of the 4 years the follow-up, the mean primary and secondary patency were 47.2% and 80% respectively. Only female sex was significantly associated with a decrease in both primary patency (<i>p</i> = 0.043, HR = 0.48) and secondary patency (<i>p</i> = 0.021, HR = 0.023). Furthermore, radial artery systolic peak velocity (<i>p</i> = 0.007, HR = 2.6) showed a significant association with decreased primary patency and forearm cephalic vein diameter showed a borderline significant association with decreased secondary patency (<i>p</i> = 0.046, HR = 8.2).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A standardized evaluation by a vascular surgeon or nephrologist represent a key in the preoperative assessment of AVF candidates. Based on our results, we will consider to avoid distal vascular access in both female patients with lower radial artery systolic peak velocity (less than 68 cm/s) and borderline forearm cephalic vein diameter (less than 2.8 mm) after initial assessment in our clinical practice. Our results could encourage new studies in order to stablish the potential role of these parameters in the RCFs patency rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"124-130"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71489434","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2023-11-23DOI: 10.1177/11297298231212225
Shuqi Xu, Jie Wang, Lijun Tang, Wei Cao, Liming Liang, Kai Wei, Zunsong Wang, Xianglei Kong
Objective: Autologous arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is recommended as superior vascular access for hemodialysis but has a high rate of failure, and juxta-anastomotic stenosis (JAS) is one of the predominant causes of fistula failure. The aim of this study was to compare the primary patency in reconstruction of failed AVFs due to JAS between the radial artery deviation and reimplantation (RADAR) technique and traditional surgery (end-vein to side-artery neo-anastomosis) in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients.
Methods: A total of 1215 MHD patients with failed AVF were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study, and 614 patients with failed AVF received surgical intervention. Among these surgical interventions, 417 patients experienced AVF failure due to JAS. Finally, 25 patients who received the RADAR technique were enrolled. Controls of 50 patients received traditional surgery were randomly selected matched by age and sex. Clinical data such as age, sex, comorbidities, and blood biochemical indices were collected. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to explore the difference between the RADAR group and the traditional group in reconstruction of failed AVFs.
Results: The RADAR group and the traditional group shared common baseline characteristics. The primary patencies of the reconstructed AVFs were 88.8%, 79.0%, 72.2%, 57.4%, and 38.3% at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months among the 75 patients, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis demonstrated similar primary patencies in the two groups (log-rank test, p = 0.73). Compared with the traditional group, the RADAR group had no difference in predicting AVF failure after adjusting for potential confounders, with an HR of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.18-4.63).
Conclusions: The primary patency of the RADAR technique and the traditional surgery in the reconstruction of failed AVFs due to JAS is almost equal in 5 years.
{"title":"The RADAR technique in reconstruction of failed autologous arteriovenous fistulas due to juxta-anastomotic stenosis is equivalent to that with traditional surgery in maintenance hemodialysis patients.","authors":"Shuqi Xu, Jie Wang, Lijun Tang, Wei Cao, Liming Liang, Kai Wei, Zunsong Wang, Xianglei Kong","doi":"10.1177/11297298231212225","DOIUrl":"10.1177/11297298231212225","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Autologous arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is recommended as superior vascular access for hemodialysis but has a high rate of failure, and juxta-anastomotic stenosis (JAS) is one of the predominant causes of fistula failure. The aim of this study was to compare the primary patency in reconstruction of failed AVFs due to JAS between the radial artery deviation and reimplantation (RADAR) technique and traditional surgery (end-vein to side-artery neo-anastomosis) in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1215 MHD patients with failed AVF were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study, and 614 patients with failed AVF received surgical intervention. Among these surgical interventions, 417 patients experienced AVF failure due to JAS. Finally, 25 patients who received the RADAR technique were enrolled. Controls of 50 patients received traditional surgery were randomly selected matched by age and sex. Clinical data such as age, sex, comorbidities, and blood biochemical indices were collected. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to explore the difference between the RADAR group and the traditional group in reconstruction of failed AVFs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The RADAR group and the traditional group shared common baseline characteristics. The primary patencies of the reconstructed AVFs were 88.8%, 79.0%, 72.2%, 57.4%, and 38.3% at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months among the 75 patients, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis demonstrated similar primary patencies in the two groups (log-rank test, <i>p</i> = 0.73). Compared with the traditional group, the RADAR group had no difference in predicting AVF failure after adjusting for potential confounders, with an HR of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.18-4.63).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The primary patency of the RADAR technique and the traditional surgery in the reconstruction of failed AVFs due to JAS is almost equal in 5 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"280-288"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138300754","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2023-12-25DOI: 10.1177/11297298231203356
Patrick Heindel, Tanujit Dey, James J Fitzgibbon, Muhammad Mamdani, Dirk M Hentschel, Michael Belkin, Charles Keith Ozaki, Mohamad A Hussain
Objective: Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) guidelines discourage ongoing access salvage attempts after two interventions prior to successful use or more than three interventions per year overall. The goal was to develop a tool for prediction of radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula (AVF) intervention requirements to help guide shared decision-making about access appropriateness.
Methods: Prospective cohort study of 914 adult patients in the United States and Canada undergoing radiocephalic AVF creation at one of the 39 centers participating in the PATENCY-1 or -2 trials. Clinical data, including demographics, comorbidities, access history, anatomic features, and post-operative ultrasound measurements at 4-6 and 12 weeks were used to predict recurrent interventions required at 1 year postoperatively. Cox proportional hazards, random survival forest, pooled logistic, and elastic net recurrent event survival prediction models were built using a combination of baseline characteristics and post-operative ultrasound measurements. A web application was created, which generates patient-specific predictions contextualized with the KDOQI guidelines.
Results: Patients underwent an estimated 1.04 (95% CI 0.94-1.13) interventions in the first year. Mean (SD) age was 57 (13) years; 22% were female. Radiocephalic AVFs were created at the snuffbox (2%), wrist (74%), or proximal forearm (24%). Using baseline characteristics, the random survival forest model performed best, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.75 (95% CI 0.67-0.82) at 1 year. The addition of ultrasound information to baseline characteristics did not substantially improve performance; however, Cox models using either 4-6- or 12-week post-operative ultrasound information alone had the best discrimination performance, with AUROCs of 0.77 (0.70-0.85) and 0.76 (0.70-0.83) at 1 year. The interactive web application is deployed at https://predict-avf.com.
Conclusions: The PREDICT-AVF web application can guide patient counseling and guideline-concordant shared decision-making as part of a patient-centered end-stage kidney disease life plan.
{"title":"Predicting recurrent interventions after radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula creation with machine learning and the PREDICT-AVF web app.","authors":"Patrick Heindel, Tanujit Dey, James J Fitzgibbon, Muhammad Mamdani, Dirk M Hentschel, Michael Belkin, Charles Keith Ozaki, Mohamad A Hussain","doi":"10.1177/11297298231203356","DOIUrl":"10.1177/11297298231203356","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) guidelines discourage ongoing access salvage attempts after two interventions prior to successful use or more than three interventions per year overall. The goal was to develop a tool for prediction of radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula (AVF) intervention requirements to help guide shared decision-making about access appropriateness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective cohort study of 914 adult patients in the United States and Canada undergoing radiocephalic AVF creation at one of the 39 centers participating in the PATENCY-1 or -2 trials. Clinical data, including demographics, comorbidities, access history, anatomic features, and post-operative ultrasound measurements at 4-6 and 12 weeks were used to predict recurrent interventions required at 1 year postoperatively. Cox proportional hazards, random survival forest, pooled logistic, and elastic net recurrent event survival prediction models were built using a combination of baseline characteristics and post-operative ultrasound measurements. A web application was created, which generates patient-specific predictions contextualized with the KDOQI guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients underwent an estimated 1.04 (95% CI 0.94-1.13) interventions in the first year. Mean (SD) age was 57 (13) years; 22% were female. Radiocephalic AVFs were created at the snuffbox (2%), wrist (74%), or proximal forearm (24%). Using baseline characteristics, the random survival forest model performed best, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.75 (95% CI 0.67-0.82) at 1 year. The addition of ultrasound information to baseline characteristics did not substantially improve performance; however, Cox models using either 4-6- or 12-week post-operative ultrasound information alone had the best discrimination performance, with AUROCs of 0.77 (0.70-0.85) and 0.76 (0.70-0.83) at 1 year. The interactive web application is deployed at https://predict-avf.com.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PREDICT-AVF web application can guide patient counseling and guideline-concordant shared decision-making as part of a patient-centered end-stage kidney disease life plan.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"202-210"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139032826","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2023-11-23DOI: 10.1177/11297298231212393
Takaaki Maruhashi, Marina Oi, Jun Hattori, Yasushi Asari
Background: To compare the distal radial artery approach (DRA) with a longer catheter to DRA with a shorter catheter in arterial catheter (AC) placement in the intensive care unit (ICU).
Methods: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of DRA with a long catheter (60 mm) for arterial catheterization in the ICU. DRA with a short catheter (25-30 mm) was used in the control group, and the groups were compared using multivariate regression analysis. The primary study endpoint was the incidence of unplanned AC removal. The secondary endpoint was the incidence of other inappropriate events, namely loss of arterial pressure waveforms, bleeding, catheter-related infection, pressure ulcer, and other complications associated with the AC.
Results: In this study, the DRA with a long catheter was used in 50 patients. No unplanned AC removals or other inappropriate events occurred, and there were no complications associated with the DRA. The DRA procedural success rate was 100%. There was no significant difference in hemostasis times between the groups. Loss of arterial waveforms was an early predictor of unplanned AC removal.
Conclusions: The DRA with a long catheter provided stable monitoring and was associated with a low unplanned removal rate. This method has the advantages of fewer complications and shorter hemostasis time compared with the DRA with a short catheter, and may become a new AC option in the ICU.
{"title":"Distal radial approach for arterial pressure monitoring with a long catheter provides safe and stable monitoring in the intensive care unit: A single-center retrospective study.","authors":"Takaaki Maruhashi, Marina Oi, Jun Hattori, Yasushi Asari","doi":"10.1177/11297298231212393","DOIUrl":"10.1177/11297298231212393","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To compare the distal radial artery approach (DRA) with a longer catheter to DRA with a shorter catheter in arterial catheter (AC) placement in the intensive care unit (ICU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of DRA with a long catheter (60 mm) for arterial catheterization in the ICU. DRA with a short catheter (25-30 mm) was used in the control group, and the groups were compared using multivariate regression analysis. The primary study endpoint was the incidence of unplanned AC removal. The secondary endpoint was the incidence of other inappropriate events, namely loss of arterial pressure waveforms, bleeding, catheter-related infection, pressure ulcer, and other complications associated with the AC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, the DRA with a long catheter was used in 50 patients. No unplanned AC removals or other inappropriate events occurred, and there were no complications associated with the DRA. The DRA procedural success rate was 100%. There was no significant difference in hemostasis times between the groups. Loss of arterial waveforms was an early predictor of unplanned AC removal.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DRA with a long catheter provided stable monitoring and was associated with a low unplanned removal rate. This method has the advantages of fewer complications and shorter hemostasis time compared with the DRA with a short catheter, and may become a new AC option in the ICU.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"168-174"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138300725","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2023-10-24DOI: 10.1177/11297298231202046
Tatiana Bolgeo, Roberta Di Matteo, Stefania Crivellari, Denise Gatti, Antonella Cassinari, Carmela Riccio, Antonina De Angelis, Sara Delfanti, Elisabetta Ferrero, Claudia Gnani, Giuseppe Riili, Antonio Maconi
Background: Pleural mesothelioma (PM) is a rare and aggressive cancer. PICC devices are widely used in cancer patients. The aim of the study is to evaluate the quality of life of patients with PICC diagnosed with PM treated at the Hospital of Casale Monferrato and Alessandria (Italy), an area with a high incidence of asbestos-related diseases.
Study design and methods: Longitudinal prospective observational study with data collection at PICC insertion (T0), after 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2), and 9 months (T3). Participants were aged >18 years, diagnosed with PM, eligible for PICC insertion. Questionnaires used: EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-LC13, and HADS rating scale.
Results: Twenty-eight patients were enrolled. The mean age was 68.93 years (SD 9.13), mostly male (57.1%). The most frequent cancer stage at diagnosis was III (39.3%), then I (32.1%), and IV (21.4%). 85.7% were treated with chemotherapy, 14.3% also with immunotherapy. 96.4% of patients reported no complications during PICC implantation. The perception of health status and quality of life, measured on a scale of 1-7, was in line with an average score of 5 during the evaluation period. The total anxiety and depression score remained normal for most patients (0-7).
Conclusions: The PICC management involved a multidisciplinary team with different skills: study findings revealed the key role that dedicated nurses play in PICC placement and ensuring patient problems are promptly addressed. From our study results, PICC placement does not seem to negatively impact the patient's quality of life.
{"title":"Quality of life in patients with PICC diagnosed with mesothelioma: Results of a multicenter epidemiological survey (LifePICC).","authors":"Tatiana Bolgeo, Roberta Di Matteo, Stefania Crivellari, Denise Gatti, Antonella Cassinari, Carmela Riccio, Antonina De Angelis, Sara Delfanti, Elisabetta Ferrero, Claudia Gnani, Giuseppe Riili, Antonio Maconi","doi":"10.1177/11297298231202046","DOIUrl":"10.1177/11297298231202046","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pleural mesothelioma (PM) is a rare and aggressive cancer. PICC devices are widely used in cancer patients. The aim of the study is to evaluate the quality of life of patients with PICC diagnosed with PM treated at the Hospital of Casale Monferrato and Alessandria (Italy), an area with a high incidence of asbestos-related diseases.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>Longitudinal prospective observational study with data collection at PICC insertion (T0), after 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2), and 9 months (T3). Participants were aged >18 years, diagnosed with PM, eligible for PICC insertion. Questionnaires used: EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-LC13, and HADS rating scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight patients were enrolled. The mean age was 68.93 years (SD 9.13), mostly male (57.1%). The most frequent cancer stage at diagnosis was III (39.3%), then I (32.1%), and IV (21.4%). 85.7% were treated with chemotherapy, 14.3% also with immunotherapy. 96.4% of patients reported no complications during PICC implantation. The perception of health status and quality of life, measured on a scale of 1-7, was in line with an average score of 5 during the evaluation period. The total anxiety and depression score remained normal for most patients (0-7).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PICC management involved a multidisciplinary team with different skills: study findings revealed the key role that dedicated nurses play in PICC placement and ensuring patient problems are promptly addressed. From our study results, PICC placement does not seem to negatively impact the patient's quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"217-227"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49694298","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2023-11-23DOI: 10.1177/11297298231210952
Bilal Masood, Syeda Adiya Batool Zaidi, Shabina Alam, Shuahullah Mir
Background: The basilic vein transposition is a brachio basilic arteriovenous fistula (AVF) made after the mobilization and transferring of basilic vein to the ventral aspect of arm inside a subcutaneous pocket by direct dissection. The procedure can be performed either in single stage or two stages. This study compares the clinical efficacy and long term utility of single-stage and two-stage basilic vein transposition among patients of renal failure and to evaluate failure rate, primary patency rates, and postoperative complications.
Method: Patients who underwent basilic vein transposition at Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation, Karachi from January 2021 to December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups according to single stage or two-stage procedure. After the surgical procedure, assessment of fistula maturation and surveillance were undertaken using ultrasound and physical examination. Patients were requested to visit the out-patient clinic for assessment of fistula patency and post-operative complications at regular intervals of 3, 6, and 12 months respectively.
Result: During the 12 months' interval, 82 (39.04%) basilic vein transpositions were performed in single-stage and 128 (60.95%) were two-staged transposition. In our analysis we have found that as compared to single stage, two-stage basilic vein transpositions showed significantly better primary patency rates (76.82% vs 96%; p-value 0.000) and required less interventions for maintaining fistula patency. More post-operative sequelae were noted in the single stage version of the procedure as compared to the two stage procedure.
Conclusion: Two stage procedure of basilic vein transposition is found to have better patency rate and lesser post-surgical complications. However, a matched cohort prospective study is still needed to further strengthen the conclusion.
背景:basilic静脉转位是将basilic静脉在皮下袋内直接剥离并转移至手臂腹侧后形成的肱基底动静脉瘘(AVF)。该过程可分单阶段或两阶段进行。本研究比较了单期和两期基底静脉转位在肾衰竭患者中的临床疗效和长期效用,并评估了失败率、初级通畅率和术后并发症。方法:回顾性分析2021年1月至2021年12月在卡拉奇Sindh泌尿外科和移植研究所行基底静脉转位的患者。患者按单期或两期手术分为两组。手术后,利用超声和体格检查评估瘘管成熟和监测。患者被要求分别在3个月、6个月和12个月定期到门诊评估瘘管通畅程度和术后并发症。结果:12个月间,单期行basilic静脉转位82例(39.04%),两期行basilic静脉转位128例(60.95%)。在我们的分析中,我们发现与单期相比,两期基底静脉转位的原发性通畅率明显更好(76.82% vs 96%;p值0.000),并且需要较少的干预来维持瘘管通畅。与两阶段手术相比,单阶段手术的术后后遗症更多。结论:两期行basilic静脉转位术通畅率高,术后并发症少。然而,还需要一项匹配的队列前瞻性研究来进一步加强这一结论。
{"title":"Single stage versus two stage basilic vein transposition for hemodialysis access: A retrospective observational study.","authors":"Bilal Masood, Syeda Adiya Batool Zaidi, Shabina Alam, Shuahullah Mir","doi":"10.1177/11297298231210952","DOIUrl":"10.1177/11297298231210952","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The basilic vein transposition is a brachio basilic arteriovenous fistula (AVF) made after the mobilization and transferring of basilic vein to the ventral aspect of arm inside a subcutaneous pocket by direct dissection. The procedure can be performed either in single stage or two stages. This study compares the clinical efficacy and long term utility of single-stage and two-stage basilic vein transposition among patients of renal failure and to evaluate failure rate, primary patency rates, and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Patients who underwent basilic vein transposition at Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation, Karachi from January 2021 to December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups according to single stage or two-stage procedure. After the surgical procedure, assessment of fistula maturation and surveillance were undertaken using ultrasound and physical examination. Patients were requested to visit the out-patient clinic for assessment of fistula patency and post-operative complications at regular intervals of 3, 6, and 12 months respectively.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>During the 12 months' interval, 82 (39.04%) basilic vein transpositions were performed in single-stage and 128 (60.95%) were two-staged transposition. In our analysis we have found that as compared to single stage, two-stage basilic vein transpositions showed significantly better primary patency rates (76.82% vs 96%; <i>p</i>-value 0.000) and required less interventions for maintaining fistula patency. More post-operative sequelae were noted in the single stage version of the procedure as compared to the two stage procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Two stage procedure of basilic vein transposition is found to have better patency rate and lesser post-surgical complications. However, a matched cohort prospective study is still needed to further strengthen the conclusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"265-270"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138300753","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2023-12-23DOI: 10.1177/11297298231214032
Saravanan Balamuthusamy, Nisha Dhanabalsamy, Manu S Bala, Prashant Reddy, Ayla Siddiqui, Manonmani Ellappan, Sowmya Gopalakrishnan, Peter Nguyen
Background: Distal hand ischemia syndrome (DHIS) is a well reported adverse outcome in patients with upper arm AV access. 25%-40% of these patients have been reported to be due to primary arterial disease complicated with significant arterial calcification. The effectiveness of revascularization of the distal arterial circulation on symptom resolution has not been reported yet.
Methods: Retrospective single center analysis of patients evaluated for hand/forearm pain in patients with upper arm AV access who had arterial revascularization between 01/2016 and 12/2020 were included for the analysis. Fifty-one patients met inclusion criteria. Stenotic lesions greater than 70% in the subclavian, axillary, brachial, radial, or ulnar artery were treated with balloon angioplasty. Institutional approval was obtained to review charts.
Outcomes: Successful revascularization, improvement in pain in 48 h, 1 month, and 3 months.
Results: Seventy six percent of patients had an upper arm Arteriovenous Fistula (AVF) and 24% patients had an upper arm Arteriovenous Graft (AVG). Mean access flow was 1210 (556) ml/min. 55% of patients had radial or ulnar arterial stenosis, 45% had brachial/axillary or subclavian artery stenosis. 45% patients had lesions in both radial and ulnar arteries, 88% of patients were successfully revascularized. 76% (18) of patients had improvement in symptoms within 48 h and 68% remained symptom free in 3 months. Mean DHIS stage was 3.1 before intervention and improved to 1.1 post intervention (p < 0.001). Patient satisfaction with their AV access improved from 34% to 72% (p < 0.01). Multiple regression analysis did not reveal statistically significant correlations between time on dialysis vintage and other chronic medical conditions on post procedure symptom improvement.
Conclusions: DHIS with occlusive arterial disease can be successfully revascularized to improve symptoms. Complete evaluation of the inflow arterial segment and optimal endovascular revascularization could decrease the need for access revision procedures or access abandonment.
{"title":"Arterial revascularization in patients with hand pain dialyzing with upper arm Arteriovenous (AV) fistulas: A single center experience.","authors":"Saravanan Balamuthusamy, Nisha Dhanabalsamy, Manu S Bala, Prashant Reddy, Ayla Siddiqui, Manonmani Ellappan, Sowmya Gopalakrishnan, Peter Nguyen","doi":"10.1177/11297298231214032","DOIUrl":"10.1177/11297298231214032","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Distal hand ischemia syndrome (DHIS) is a well reported adverse outcome in patients with upper arm AV access. 25%-40% of these patients have been reported to be due to primary arterial disease complicated with significant arterial calcification. The effectiveness of revascularization of the distal arterial circulation on symptom resolution has not been reported yet.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective single center analysis of patients evaluated for hand/forearm pain in patients with upper arm AV access who had arterial revascularization between 01/2016 and 12/2020 were included for the analysis. Fifty-one patients met inclusion criteria. Stenotic lesions greater than 70% in the subclavian, axillary, brachial, radial, or ulnar artery were treated with balloon angioplasty. Institutional approval was obtained to review charts.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Successful revascularization, improvement in pain in 48 h, 1 month, and 3 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy six percent of patients had an upper arm Arteriovenous Fistula (AVF) and 24% patients had an upper arm Arteriovenous Graft (AVG). Mean access flow was 1210 (556) ml/min. 55% of patients had radial or ulnar arterial stenosis, 45% had brachial/axillary or subclavian artery stenosis. 45% patients had lesions in both radial and ulnar arteries, 88% of patients were successfully revascularized. 76% (18) of patients had improvement in symptoms within 48 h and 68% remained symptom free in 3 months. Mean DHIS stage was 3.1 before intervention and improved to 1.1 post intervention (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Patient satisfaction with their AV access improved from 34% to 72% (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Multiple regression analysis did not reveal statistically significant correlations between time on dialysis vintage and other chronic medical conditions on post procedure symptom improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DHIS with occlusive arterial disease can be successfully revascularized to improve symptoms. Complete evaluation of the inflow arterial segment and optimal endovascular revascularization could decrease the need for access revision procedures or access abandonment.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"89-94"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139032823","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2023-12-05DOI: 10.1177/11297298231209564
Eunju Jang, Soo Mi Son, Ki-Yoon Moon, Seunghoon Lee, Hong Seok Han, Sun Cheol Park, Jang Yong Kim, Sang Seob Yun
Background: Peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) has become a common procedure. Although ultrasound (US)-guidance has improved success rates, a small percentage of malposition is inevitable. The purpose of our study is to evaluate malposition rates of US-guided bedside PICC catheter insertion, and the clinical factors associated with malposition.
Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study evaluating 5981 patients who had undergone ultrasound-guided bedside PICC placement from January 2017 to December 2021 at a single tertiary center. Final tip location was confirmed on chest radiograph.
Results: Patients were categorized into optimal, suboptimal, and malposition groups according to final tip location. 4866 cases (81.7%) showed optimal tip position, 790 (13.3%) were suboptimal, and 299 (5.0%) were malpositioned. Logistic regression analysis identified six variables associated with tip malposition; height (odds ratio (OR) 1.044; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.028-1.061; p < 0.001), body mass index (BMI) (OR 1.051; 95% CI, 1.017-1.087; p = 0.003), prior failure at accessing peripheral intravenous (IV) access (OR 1.718; 95% CI, 1.215-2.428; p = 0.002), side of the arm (OR 3.467; 95% CI, 2.457-4.891; p < 0.001), length of the catheter (OR 0.763; 95% CI, 0.734-0.794; p < 0.001), and number of previous central catheter insertions (OR 1.069; 95% CI, 1.004-1.140; p = 0.038). Malpositioned catheters were corrected by either bedside repositioning, bedside reinsertion, fluoroscopic reinsertion, switching to jugular catheters or catheter removal. No patient related factors were significantly associated with malposition or success of reposition.
Conclusion: US-guidance can help reduce catheter malposition during bedside PICC insertion. Patients with risk factors such as multiple previous central vein insertions, failed peripheral line insertions, left arm insertion, or high BMI should undergo thorough sonographic evaluation of the arm vessels to prevent malposition.
{"title":"Analysis of tip malposition and correction of peripherally inserted central catheters under ultrasound-guidance: 5-year outcomes from a single center.","authors":"Eunju Jang, Soo Mi Son, Ki-Yoon Moon, Seunghoon Lee, Hong Seok Han, Sun Cheol Park, Jang Yong Kim, Sang Seob Yun","doi":"10.1177/11297298231209564","DOIUrl":"10.1177/11297298231209564","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) has become a common procedure. Although ultrasound (US)-guidance has improved success rates, a small percentage of malposition is inevitable. The purpose of our study is to evaluate malposition rates of US-guided bedside PICC catheter insertion, and the clinical factors associated with malposition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study evaluating 5981 patients who had undergone ultrasound-guided bedside PICC placement from January 2017 to December 2021 at a single tertiary center. Final tip location was confirmed on chest radiograph.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients were categorized into optimal, suboptimal, and malposition groups according to final tip location. 4866 cases (81.7%) showed optimal tip position, 790 (13.3%) were suboptimal, and 299 (5.0%) were malpositioned. Logistic regression analysis identified six variables associated with tip malposition; height (odds ratio (OR) 1.044; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.028-1.061; <i>p</i> < 0.001), body mass index (BMI) (OR 1.051; 95% CI, 1.017-1.087; <i>p</i> = 0.003), prior failure at accessing peripheral intravenous (IV) access (OR 1.718; 95% CI, 1.215-2.428; <i>p</i> = 0.002), side of the arm (OR 3.467; 95% CI, 2.457-4.891; <i>p</i> < 0.001), length of the catheter (OR 0.763; 95% CI, 0.734-0.794; <i>p</i> < 0.001), and number of previous central catheter insertions (OR 1.069; 95% CI, 1.004-1.140; <i>p</i> = 0.038). Malpositioned catheters were corrected by either bedside repositioning, bedside reinsertion, fluoroscopic reinsertion, switching to jugular catheters or catheter removal. No patient related factors were significantly associated with malposition or success of reposition.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>US-guidance can help reduce catheter malposition during bedside PICC insertion. Patients with risk factors such as multiple previous central vein insertions, failed peripheral line insertions, left arm insertion, or high BMI should undergo thorough sonographic evaluation of the arm vessels to prevent malposition.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"72-80"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138489202","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}