L. J. van Zeelst, R. Derksen, C. H. W. Wijers, et al., “The Quest for Outpatient Mastectomy in COVID-19 Era: Barriers and Facilitators,” The Breast Journal 2022 (2022): 1863519, https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1863519.
In the article titled “The Quest for Outpatient Mastectomy in COVID-19 Era: Barriers and Facilitators” there were errors in Figure 1 and Table 1.
In Figure 1 legends, inpatient mastectomy and outpatient mastectomy were attributed to the wrong colour. The corrected Figure 1 is shown below.
In Table 1, values in the polypharmacy rows were incorrect. The corrected Table 1 is shown below.
We apologize for this error.
L. J. van Zeelst, R. Derksen, C. H. W. Wijers等,“The Quest for门诊乳房切除术in COVID-19时代:Barriers and Facilitators”,The Breast Journal 2022 (2022): 1863519, https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1863519.In文章标题为“The Quest for门诊乳房切除术in COVID-19时代:Barriers and Facilitators”,图1和表1中存在错误。在图1图例中,住院乳房切除术和门诊乳房切除术的颜色都是错误的。更正后的图1如下所示。在表1中,polypharmacy行中的值不正确。更正后的表1如下所示。我们为这个错误道歉。
{"title":"Corrigendum to “The Quest for Outpatient Mastectomy in COVID-19 Era: Barriers and Facilitators”","authors":"","doi":"10.1155/tbj/9847254","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/tbj/9847254","url":null,"abstract":"<p>L. J. van Zeelst, R. Derksen, C. H. W. Wijers, et al., “The Quest for Outpatient Mastectomy in COVID-19 Era: Barriers and Facilitators,” <i>The Breast Journal</i> 2022 (2022): 1863519, https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1863519.</p><p>In the article titled “The Quest for Outpatient Mastectomy in COVID-19 Era: Barriers and Facilitators” there were errors in Figure 1 and Table 1.</p><p>In Figure 1 legends, inpatient mastectomy and outpatient mastectomy were attributed to the wrong colour. The corrected Figure 1 is shown below.</p><p>In Table 1, values in the polypharmacy rows were incorrect. The corrected Table 1 is shown below.</p><p>We apologize for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":56326,"journal":{"name":"Breast Journal","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/tbj/9847254","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145101691","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: This study aimed to qualitatively assess the added diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), using Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) lexicon descriptors, in evaluating breast lesions with type 2 dynamic curves.
Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 181 breast lesions with type 2 dynamic curves in 181 consecutive patients who underwent 3-Tesla (3-T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Trained radiologists assessed the morphological features of the lesions on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI, DWI, and T2WI using BI-RADS lexicon descriptors and measured the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Statistical analysis was performed to compare variables in lesion type groups (mass-like group vs. nonmass-like group). Diagnostic performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the DeLong test, with statistical significance at p < 0.05.
Results: In mass-like lesions, all morphological parameters significantly distinguished benign from malignant lesions on DCE, DWI, and T2WI (all p < 0.05). ADC values also showed significant differences (p < 0.05). The combined approach (DCE + DWI + T2WI) yielded the highest AUC (0.895), significantly outperforming the individual methods (all p < 0.05). In nonmass-like lesions, no parameter significantly predicted malignancy (all p > 0.05).
Conclusion: The addition of DWI and T2WI, interpreted using the BI-RADS lexicon descriptors, enhances the differential diagnosis of breast lesions with type 2 dynamic curves.
{"title":"Morphological Assessment of Breast Lesions With Type 2 Dynamic Curves Using DWI and T2WI Based on Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Lexicon Descriptors","authors":"Liying Zhang, Gongsheng Zhu, Kefan Wang, Tongzhen Zhang, Lin Lu, Xin Zhao","doi":"10.1155/tbj/9957678","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/tbj/9957678","url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Purpose:</b> This study aimed to qualitatively assess the added diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), using Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) lexicon descriptors, in evaluating breast lesions with type 2 dynamic curves.</p><p><b>Materials and Methods:</b> We retrospectively reviewed 181 breast lesions with type 2 dynamic curves in 181 consecutive patients who underwent 3-Tesla (3-T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Trained radiologists assessed the morphological features of the lesions on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI, DWI, and T2WI using BI-RADS lexicon descriptors and measured the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Statistical analysis was performed to compare variables in lesion type groups (mass-like group vs. nonmass-like group). Diagnostic performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the DeLong test, with statistical significance at <i>p</i> < 0.05.</p><p><b>Results:</b> In mass-like lesions, all morphological parameters significantly distinguished benign from malignant lesions on DCE, DWI, and T2WI (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). ADC values also showed significant differences (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The combined approach (DCE + DWI + T2WI) yielded the highest AUC (0.895), significantly outperforming the individual methods (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). In nonmass-like lesions, no parameter significantly predicted malignancy (all <i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> The addition of DWI and T2WI, interpreted using the BI-RADS lexicon descriptors, enhances the differential diagnosis of breast lesions with type 2 dynamic curves.</p>","PeriodicalId":56326,"journal":{"name":"Breast Journal","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/tbj/9957678","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144997896","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kyle Xia, Eileen Chen, Roxana Hu, Ian Pagano, Jami Fukui
Purpose: The Oncotype DX test is standardly used for patients with early-stage, hormone-receptor–positive, HER2-negative breast cancers to determine the benefit from chemotherapy and the likelihood of distant recurrence. The relationship between Oncotype DX recurrence scores and race/ethnicity is still being studied. This retrospective study aims to evaluate the relationship between Oncotype DX recurrence scores, race/ethnicity, and clinicopathological factors and to support the applicability of the Oncotype DX test for a diverse breast cancer population of Hawaii.
Materials and Methods: We evaluated 879 breast cancer cases diagnosed from January 2018–March 2022 within a major health system in Hawaii, 600 of which received Oncotype DX recurrence scores to provide prognostic and therapy-predictive information based on NCCN guidelines. Linear regression with both univariable (unadjusted) and multivariable (adjusted for all other variables) models was run on the 600 breast cancer cases that received Oncotype DX recurrence scores. The predictor variables were age at diagnosis, race, tumor size, ER/PR status, and histology.
Results: On multivariable analysis, we found statically significant differences in Oncotype DX recurrence scores according to age (60–69 vs. 18–49, p = 0.01), ER/PR status (PR-positive vs. PR-negative, p < 0.0001), histology (other vs. ductal, p = 0.004), and tumor size (2–5 cm vs. 0-1 cm, p = 0.0003). We found no significant differences in Oncotype DX recurrence scores according to race/ethnicity.
Conclusion: Our findings indicate that Oncotype DX recurrence scores are not variable according to race/ethnicity, highlighting the need for further research to understand the known disparities in breast cancer outcomes among different racial/ethnic groups. Our study supports the correlation between Oncotype DX recurrence scores and other factors and aligns with established prognostic trends for these variables in a diverse population. This study supports the applicability for the Oncotype DX test in a diverse breast cancer population of Hawaii.
目的:Oncotype DX检测标准用于早期、激素受体阳性、her2阴性乳腺癌患者,以确定化疗的获益和远处复发的可能性。Oncotype DX复发评分与种族/民族之间的关系仍在研究中。本回顾性研究旨在评估Oncotype DX复发评分、种族/民族和临床病理因素之间的关系,并支持Oncotype DX检测在夏威夷不同乳腺癌人群中的适用性。材料和方法:我们在夏威夷的一个主要卫生系统中评估了2018年1月至2022年3月诊断的879例乳腺癌病例,其中600例接受了Oncotype DX复发评分,以提供基于NCCN指南的预后和治疗预测信息。对600例接受Oncotype DX复发评分的乳腺癌病例进行单变量(未调整)和多变量(对所有其他变量进行调整)模型的线性回归。预测变量为诊断年龄、种族、肿瘤大小、ER/PR状态和组织学。结果:在多变量分析中,我们发现Oncotype DX复发评分在年龄(60-69 vs 18-49, p = 0.01)、ER/PR状态(PR阳性vs PR阴性,p < 0.0001)、组织学(其他vs导管,p = 0.004)和肿瘤大小(2-5 cm vs 0-1 cm, p = 0.0003)方面存在统计学差异。我们发现不同种族/民族的Oncotype DX复发评分无显著差异。结论:我们的研究结果表明,Oncotype DX复发评分不随种族/民族而变化,强调需要进一步研究以了解不同种族/民族之间乳腺癌结局的已知差异。我们的研究支持Oncotype DX复发评分与其他因素之间的相关性,并与不同人群中这些变量的既定预后趋势相一致。本研究支持Oncotype DX检测在夏威夷不同乳腺癌人群中的适用性。
{"title":"Applicability of Oncotype DX Testing in a Diverse Breast Cancer Population in Hawaii","authors":"Kyle Xia, Eileen Chen, Roxana Hu, Ian Pagano, Jami Fukui","doi":"10.1155/tbj/9104103","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/tbj/9104103","url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Purpose:</b> The Oncotype DX test is standardly used for patients with early-stage, hormone-receptor–positive, HER2-negative breast cancers to determine the benefit from chemotherapy and the likelihood of distant recurrence. The relationship between Oncotype DX recurrence scores and race/ethnicity is still being studied. This retrospective study aims to evaluate the relationship between Oncotype DX recurrence scores, race/ethnicity, and clinicopathological factors and to support the applicability of the Oncotype DX test for a diverse breast cancer population of Hawaii.</p><p><b>Materials and Methods:</b> We evaluated 879 breast cancer cases diagnosed from January 2018–March 2022 within a major health system in Hawaii, 600 of which received Oncotype DX recurrence scores to provide prognostic and therapy-predictive information based on NCCN guidelines. Linear regression with both univariable (unadjusted) and multivariable (adjusted for all other variables) models was run on the 600 breast cancer cases that received Oncotype DX recurrence scores. The predictor variables were age at diagnosis, race, tumor size, ER/PR status, and histology.</p><p><b>Results:</b> On multivariable analysis, we found statically significant differences in Oncotype DX recurrence scores according to age (60–69 vs. 18–49, <i>p</i> = 0.01), ER/PR status (PR-positive vs. PR-negative, <i>p</i> < 0.0001), histology (other vs. ductal, <i>p</i> = 0.004), and tumor size (2–5 cm vs. 0-1 cm, <i>p</i> = 0.0003). We found no significant differences in Oncotype DX recurrence scores according to race/ethnicity.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> Our findings indicate that Oncotype DX recurrence scores are not variable according to race/ethnicity, highlighting the need for further research to understand the known disparities in breast cancer outcomes among different racial/ethnic groups. Our study supports the correlation between Oncotype DX recurrence scores and other factors and aligns with established prognostic trends for these variables in a diverse population. This study supports the applicability for the Oncotype DX test in a diverse breast cancer population of Hawaii.</p>","PeriodicalId":56326,"journal":{"name":"Breast Journal","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/tbj/9104103","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144923593","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}