首页 > 最新文献

Acta Cytologica最新文献

英文 中文
Risk of Malignancy in Effusions according to the International System for Serous Fluid Cytopathology: A Review. 根据国际浆液细胞病理学系统得出的积液恶变风险:综述。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-18 DOI: 10.1159/000540414
Daniel José Castilho da Silva, Caio Rodrigo Dos Santos, José Cândido Caldeira Xavier-Júnior

Introduction: The International Serous Fluid Cytopathology Reporting System (TIS) was developed to standardize communication among health professionals reporting analyses of serous fluid samples. The categories include non-diagnosis (ND), negative for malignancy (NFM), atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), suspected malignancy (SFM), and malignant (MAL). Each category was characterized by a risk of malignancy (ROM).

Methods: We performed a literature review to analyze studies related to TIS using several sources, including PubMed, followed by a search of relevant cytopathology journal websites (American Cancer Society, Diagnostic Cytopathology, Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology, and Acta Cytologica and Cytopathology). The search included articles published between January 2020 and December 2023, using the terms "international AND serous fluid system."

Results: We identified 257 articles, of which 20 addressed the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The overall ROMs for each category were 23.55% for ND, 16.46% for NFM, 50.78% for AUS, 91.34% for SFM, and 98.21% for MAL.

Conclusion: Considering the TIS-recommended ROM rates, the ND category was between the suggested intervals, while the SFM category rate was bigger than expected. The other categories (NFM, AUS, and MAL) were below expected values. SFM and MAL had a stronger association with MAL results. New studies are needed to determine each category's ROM rate from TIS accurately.

国际浆液细胞病理学报告系统(TIS)的开发旨在规范报告浆液样本分析结果的医疗专业人员之间的交流。其类别包括未诊断(ND)、恶性阴性(NFM)、意义未定的非典型(AUS)、疑似恶性(SFM)和恶性(MAL)。每个类别都有一个恶性风险(ROM)。我们进行了一次文献综述,利用包括PubMed在内的多个来源分析了与TIS相关的研究,随后又搜索了相关的细胞病理学期刊网站(美国癌症协会、《诊断细胞病理学》、《美国细胞病理学协会期刊》以及《细胞学与细胞病理学》)。检索包括 2020 年 1 月至 2023 年 12 月间发表的文章,检索词为 "国际和浆液系统"。我们确定了 257 篇文章,其中 20 篇符合纳入和排除标准。每个类别的总ROM分别为:ND为23.55%、NFM为16.46%、AUS为50.78%、SFM为91.34%、MAL为98.21%。考虑到 TIS 建议的 ROM 比率,ND 类别的比率介于建议的区间之间,而 SFM 类别的比率大于预期。其他类别(NFM、AUS 和 MAL)低于预期值。SFM和MAL与恶性结果的关联性更强。要从 TIS 中准确确定每个类别的 ROM 率,还需要进行新的研究。
{"title":"Risk of Malignancy in Effusions according to the International System for Serous Fluid Cytopathology: A Review.","authors":"Daniel José Castilho da Silva, Caio Rodrigo Dos Santos, José Cândido Caldeira Xavier-Júnior","doi":"10.1159/000540414","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000540414","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The International Serous Fluid Cytopathology Reporting System (TIS) was developed to standardize communication among health professionals reporting analyses of serous fluid samples. The categories include non-diagnosis (ND), negative for malignancy (NFM), atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), suspected malignancy (SFM), and malignant (MAL). Each category was characterized by a risk of malignancy (ROM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a literature review to analyze studies related to TIS using several sources, including PubMed, followed by a search of relevant cytopathology journal websites (American Cancer Society, Diagnostic Cytopathology, Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology, and Acta Cytologica and Cytopathology). The search included articles published between January 2020 and December 2023, using the terms \"international AND serous fluid system.\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 257 articles, of which 20 addressed the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The overall ROMs for each category were 23.55% for ND, 16.46% for NFM, 50.78% for AUS, 91.34% for SFM, and 98.21% for MAL.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Considering the TIS-recommended ROM rates, the ND category was between the suggested intervals, while the SFM category rate was bigger than expected. The other categories (NFM, AUS, and MAL) were below expected values. SFM and MAL had a stronger association with MAL results. New studies are needed to determine each category's ROM rate from TIS accurately.</p>","PeriodicalId":6959,"journal":{"name":"Acta Cytologica","volume":" ","pages":"384-393"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141722748","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Analysis of the Differences between Bethesda Groups according to Conventional Smear and Liquid-Based Cytology Methods in Cervicovaginal Cytology: A Single-Center Experience with 165,915 Cases. 宫颈阴道细胞学中传统涂片和液基细胞学方法在贝塞斯达组之间的差异分析,165,915 个病例的单中心经验。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-06 DOI: 10.1159/000536663
Ramazan Ucak, Omer Faruk Dilbaz, Nedim Polat

Introduction: Liquid-based cytology (LBC) has replaced conventional smear (CS) in the world. In this study, through a series with a large number of cases, we aimed to make a comparison and general evaluation in all groups, primarily epithelial abnormalities, according to LBC and CS methods. This study was carried out in a private pathology laboratory located in a metropolitan city, where cytological materials sent from many clinics were examined.

Material and methods: There were 165,915 cases whose smears were examined between 2012 and 2020, most of them conventional (131,224 CS, 34,691 LBC). Cases were evaluated on the basis of the Bethesda 2014 classification and divided into sub-diagnostic categories after they were divided into two main groups as "with epithelial abnormalities" and "without." χ2 and Fischer's precision statistical tests were conducted using SPSS 23.0 package. In the CS process, cervical samples were obtained using an endocervical brush and a spatula. Cells were directly spread onto the slides and promptly fixed in 95% ethanol, followed by staining with the standard Papanicolaou stain. For LBC ThinPrep, cervical specimens were gathered using a cervix brush. The brush was washed in a vial and discarded. Finally, cells were isolated through vacuum filtration and transferred to the slide using air pressure.

Results: Squamous cell abnormalities (atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance [ASC-US], atypical squamous cells - cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion [ASC-H], low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion [LSIL], high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion [HSIL], squamous cell carcinoma, atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance) were reported in 5,696 (3.43%) cases. ASC (ASC-US + ASC-H)/SIL ratio (1.36/2.04) was found to be 0.67 (recommended Bethesda ratio is <3). ASC-US (p < 0.001), ASC-H (p < 0.001), and HSIL(p < 0.001) detection rate of LBC was found to be significantly higher than CS. ASC-US (1.8/1.2), ASC-H (0.08/0.008), and HSIL (0.6/0.3) case ratios of LBC/CS were found to be significantly higher in LBC. LSIL (1.72/1.66) rate was similar.

Conclusion: LBC is superior to CS in detecting epithelial lesions. In addition to being used as a screening method, it is clear that it makes a great contribution to reducing cervical carcinomas due to HPV typing. Definitive comments regarding comparison of methods on reactive changes and microorganism detection are challenging. Preanalytical factors might account for these situations.

引言液基细胞学(LBC)已在全球范围内取代了传统涂片(CS)。在本研究中,我们通过对大量病例进行系列研究,旨在根据液基细胞学检查和传统涂片检查方法,对所有组别(主要是上皮异常)进行比较和总体评估。这项研究是在一家位于大都市的私立病理实验室进行的,该实验室对许多诊所寄来的细胞学材料进行了检查:在2012年至2020年期间,共有165915个病例的涂片接受了检查,其中大部分是常规病例(131224例CS,34691例LBC)。根据贝塞斯达 2014 分类法对病例进行评估,并将病例分为 "上皮异常 "和 "无上皮异常 "两大类,然后再分为亚诊断类别。采用 SPSS 23.0 软件包进行卡方和费舍尔精确度统计检验。在 CS 过程中,使用宫颈内膜刷和刮匙获取宫颈样本。将细胞直接涂抹在载玻片上,并立即用 95% 的乙醇固定,然后用标准巴氏染色法染色。对于 LBC ThinPrep,使用宫颈刷收集宫颈标本。刷子在小瓶中清洗后丢弃。最后通过真空过滤分离细胞,并用气压将细胞转移到载玻片上:结果:鳞状细胞异常[意义未定的非典型鳞状细胞(ASC-US)、非典型鳞状细胞--不能排除高级别鳞状上皮内病变(ASC-H)、低级别鳞状上皮内病变(LSIL)、高级别鳞状上皮内病变(HSIL)、鳞状细胞癌(SCC)、意义未定的非典型腺细胞(AGUS)]有5696例(3.43%)。ASC(ASC-US+ASC-H)/SIL 比值(1.36/2.04)为 0.67(推荐的贝塞斯达比值为 0.67):LBC 在检测上皮病变方面优于 CS。除了作为一种筛查方法外,它显然还对减少因 HPV 分型而导致的宫颈癌做出了巨大贡献。要对反应性变化和微生物检测方法的比较做出明确的评论具有挑战性。分析前的因素可能是造成这些情况的原因。
{"title":"Analysis of the Differences between Bethesda Groups according to Conventional Smear and Liquid-Based Cytology Methods in Cervicovaginal Cytology: A Single-Center Experience with 165,915 Cases.","authors":"Ramazan Ucak, Omer Faruk Dilbaz, Nedim Polat","doi":"10.1159/000536663","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000536663","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Liquid-based cytology (LBC) has replaced conventional smear (CS) in the world. In this study, through a series with a large number of cases, we aimed to make a comparison and general evaluation in all groups, primarily epithelial abnormalities, according to LBC and CS methods. This study was carried out in a private pathology laboratory located in a metropolitan city, where cytological materials sent from many clinics were examined.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>There were 165,915 cases whose smears were examined between 2012 and 2020, most of them conventional (131,224 CS, 34,691 LBC). Cases were evaluated on the basis of the Bethesda 2014 classification and divided into sub-diagnostic categories after they were divided into two main groups as \"with epithelial abnormalities\" and \"without.\" χ2 and Fischer's precision statistical tests were conducted using SPSS 23.0 package. In the CS process, cervical samples were obtained using an endocervical brush and a spatula. Cells were directly spread onto the slides and promptly fixed in 95% ethanol, followed by staining with the standard Papanicolaou stain. For LBC ThinPrep, cervical specimens were gathered using a cervix brush. The brush was washed in a vial and discarded. Finally, cells were isolated through vacuum filtration and transferred to the slide using air pressure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Squamous cell abnormalities (atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance [ASC-US], atypical squamous cells - cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion [ASC-H], low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion [LSIL], high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion [HSIL], squamous cell carcinoma, atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance) were reported in 5,696 (3.43%) cases. ASC (ASC-US + ASC-H)/SIL ratio (1.36/2.04) was found to be 0.67 (recommended Bethesda ratio is &lt;3). ASC-US (p &lt; 0.001), ASC-H (p &lt; 0.001), and HSIL(p &lt; 0.001) detection rate of LBC was found to be significantly higher than CS. ASC-US (1.8/1.2), ASC-H (0.08/0.008), and HSIL (0.6/0.3) case ratios of LBC/CS were found to be significantly higher in LBC. LSIL (1.72/1.66) rate was similar.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LBC is superior to CS in detecting epithelial lesions. In addition to being used as a screening method, it is clear that it makes a great contribution to reducing cervical carcinomas due to HPV typing. Definitive comments regarding comparison of methods on reactive changes and microorganism detection are challenging. Preanalytical factors might account for these situations.</p>","PeriodicalId":6959,"journal":{"name":"Acta Cytologica","volume":" ","pages":"54-59"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139696678","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pitfalls in Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytopathology: An Approach to Atypical Findings. 甲状腺细针抽吸细胞病理学的陷阱:非典型发现的处理方法。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-20 DOI: 10.1159/000535907
C Christofer Juhlin, Zubair W Baloch

Background: Thyroid nodules are prevalent among the general population, thus imposing substantial demands upon healthcare providers to establish effective management paradigms when investigating these lesions. A pivotal component in the diagnostic process involves the cytomorphological evaluation of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) specimens extracted from the nodule under scrutiny. This examination serves the critical purpose of enabling a comprehensive assessment for the risk of either a neoplasm or malignancy, thereby providing the clinical team with the requisite information to render decisions regarding potential surgical intervention and/or a structured clinical follow-up. A subset of FNA specimens obtained from the thyroid gland present a vexing challenge for interpretation and cannot be classified based on cytomorphology as either benign or malignant and are classified as "indeterminate" for neoplasm or malignancy. The indeterminate thyroid FNA diagnosis in the third iteration of the Bethesda classification is termed as "atypia of undetermined significance" (AUS).

Summary: The thyroid FNA specimens classified as "atypical" constitute a perplexing category, necessitating considerations such as repeated cytological evaluations, supplementary molecular analyses, diagnostic lobectomy, or vigilant surveillance. This review article draws upon the most recent Bethesda classification guidelines and delineates various potential pitfalls encountered during the interpretation of atypia observed in thyroid fine-needle aspiration and histopathologic counterparts. Additionally, it proffers strategic algorithms devised to effectively navigate these diagnostic challenges.

Key messages: It is important to recognize the value of an integrated approach when triaging AUS lesions, considering various clinical, morphological, and sometimes also immunocytochemical or molecular features.

背景:甲状腺结节在普通人群中很常见,因此要求医疗服务提供者在检查这些病变时建立有效的管理模式。诊断过程中的一个关键环节是对从受检结节中提取的细针穿刺(FNA)标本进行细胞形态学评估。这项检查的关键目的是对肿瘤或恶性肿瘤的风险进行全面评估,从而为临床团队提供必要的信息,就潜在的手术干预和/或结构化临床随访做出决定。从甲状腺获取的 FNA 标本中有一部分在判读上存在难题,无法根据细胞形态学将其分为良性或恶性,而是被归类为肿瘤或恶性 "不确定"。摘要:被归类为 "非典型 "的甲状腺 FNA 标本是一个令人困惑的类别,需要考虑重复细胞学评价、补充分子分析、诊断性腺叶切除术或警惕性监测等因素。这篇综述文章借鉴了最新的贝塞斯达分类指南,阐述了在解读甲状腺细针穿刺和组织病理学检查中观察到的非典型时可能会遇到的各种陷阱。此外,文章还提出了一些策略性算法,以有效地应对这些诊断挑战。
{"title":"Pitfalls in Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytopathology: An Approach to Atypical Findings.","authors":"C Christofer Juhlin, Zubair W Baloch","doi":"10.1159/000535907","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000535907","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thyroid nodules are prevalent among the general population, thus imposing substantial demands upon healthcare providers to establish effective management paradigms when investigating these lesions. A pivotal component in the diagnostic process involves the cytomorphological evaluation of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) specimens extracted from the nodule under scrutiny. This examination serves the critical purpose of enabling a comprehensive assessment for the risk of either a neoplasm or malignancy, thereby providing the clinical team with the requisite information to render decisions regarding potential surgical intervention and/or a structured clinical follow-up. A subset of FNA specimens obtained from the thyroid gland present a vexing challenge for interpretation and cannot be classified based on cytomorphology as either benign or malignant and are classified as \"indeterminate\" for neoplasm or malignancy. The indeterminate thyroid FNA diagnosis in the third iteration of the Bethesda classification is termed as \"atypia of undetermined significance\" (AUS).</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The thyroid FNA specimens classified as \"atypical\" constitute a perplexing category, necessitating considerations such as repeated cytological evaluations, supplementary molecular analyses, diagnostic lobectomy, or vigilant surveillance. This review article draws upon the most recent Bethesda classification guidelines and delineates various potential pitfalls encountered during the interpretation of atypia observed in thyroid fine-needle aspiration and histopathologic counterparts. Additionally, it proffers strategic algorithms devised to effectively navigate these diagnostic challenges.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>It is important to recognize the value of an integrated approach when triaging AUS lesions, considering various clinical, morphological, and sometimes also immunocytochemical or molecular features.</p>","PeriodicalId":6959,"journal":{"name":"Acta Cytologica","volume":" ","pages":"179-193"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138827629","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Overcoming Pitfalls in Breast Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology: A Practical Review. 克服乳腺 FNAC 的误区:实用综述。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-11 DOI: 10.1159/000539692
Daniel Gomes Pinto, Fernando C Schmitt

Background: Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a cornerstone technique for the initial assessment of breast lesions, offering a rapid and minimally invasive option for cytological evaluation. While FNACs can forego the need for core needle biopsies (CNBs), variations in technique, subjective interpretation, and intrinsic limitations present diagnostic challenges. The International Academy of Cytology (IAC) established the Yokohama system and is developing the WHO Reporting System for Breast Cytopathology jointly with IARC, to standardize diagnostic criteria, aiming to enhance diagnostic precision and consistency. Due to the preference for CNBs, expertise in breast FNAC is low in the developed world.

Summary: This review assesses common pitfalls in breast cytopathology. These common and uncommon entities may easily lead to false-negative or false-positive diagnoses, due to morphological overlap or misleading clinical and radiological contexts. For instance, pauci-cellular lesions, such as lobular carcinomas, often lead to false-negative diagnoses, whereas complex sclerosing lesions, fibroadenomas, and papillary lesions may show concerning features, resulting in a false positive. The same is true for some benign inflammatory pathologies, such as steatonecrosis, and uncommon lesions, such as collagenous spherulosis. Ductal carcinoma in situ can lead to both false-negative and false-positive diagnoses, and high-grade lesions are impossible to tell apart from invasive carcinomas. These are discussed in detail. Procedural and preanalytical conditions, and the role of ancillary testing, are also briefly addressed.

Key messages: Breast FNAB is a powerful diagnostic technique, fast and minimally invasive. Even in contexts which lack expertise, this technique can be successfully adopted with a cautious approach and as long as pitfalls are kept in mind, benefiting patients and healthcare systems.

背景:细针穿刺细胞学检查(FNAC)是初步评估乳腺病变的基础技术,为细胞学评估提供了快速、微创的选择。虽然 FNAC 可以避免进行核心针活检 (CNB),但技术上的差异、主观解释和固有的局限性给诊断带来了挑战。国际细胞学学会(IAC)建立了横滨系统,并正在与 IARC 联合开发世界卫生组织乳腺细胞病理学报告系统,以统一诊断标准,提高诊断的精确性和一致性。摘要:本综述评估了乳腺细胞病理学的常见误区。由于形态学重叠或误导临床和放射学背景,这些常见和不常见的实体很容易导致假阴性或假阳性诊断。例如,小叶癌等低细胞性病变常导致假阴性诊断,而复杂硬化性病变、纤维腺瘤和乳头状病变则可能显示相关特征,从而导致假阳性诊断。一些良性炎症病变(如脂肪变性)和不常见的病变(如胶原性球形病变)也是如此。乳腺导管原位癌(DCIS)可导致假阴性和假阳性诊断,而高级别病变则无法与浸润性癌区分开来。下文将详细讨论这些问题。此外,还简要讨论了程序和分析前条件以及辅助检查的作用:乳腺 FNAB 是一种强大的诊断技术,具有快速和微创的特点。即使在缺乏专业知识的情况下,只要采取谨慎的方法并牢记隐患,也能成功采用这种技术,从而使患者和医疗系统受益。
{"title":"Overcoming Pitfalls in Breast Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology: A Practical Review.","authors":"Daniel Gomes Pinto, Fernando C Schmitt","doi":"10.1159/000539692","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000539692","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a cornerstone technique for the initial assessment of breast lesions, offering a rapid and minimally invasive option for cytological evaluation. While FNACs can forego the need for core needle biopsies (CNBs), variations in technique, subjective interpretation, and intrinsic limitations present diagnostic challenges. The International Academy of Cytology (IAC) established the Yokohama system and is developing the WHO Reporting System for Breast Cytopathology jointly with IARC, to standardize diagnostic criteria, aiming to enhance diagnostic precision and consistency. Due to the preference for CNBs, expertise in breast FNAC is low in the developed world.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>This review assesses common pitfalls in breast cytopathology. These common and uncommon entities may easily lead to false-negative or false-positive diagnoses, due to morphological overlap or misleading clinical and radiological contexts. For instance, pauci-cellular lesions, such as lobular carcinomas, often lead to false-negative diagnoses, whereas complex sclerosing lesions, fibroadenomas, and papillary lesions may show concerning features, resulting in a false positive. The same is true for some benign inflammatory pathologies, such as steatonecrosis, and uncommon lesions, such as collagenous spherulosis. Ductal carcinoma in situ can lead to both false-negative and false-positive diagnoses, and high-grade lesions are impossible to tell apart from invasive carcinomas. These are discussed in detail. Procedural and preanalytical conditions, and the role of ancillary testing, are also briefly addressed.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>Breast FNAB is a powerful diagnostic technique, fast and minimally invasive. Even in contexts which lack expertise, this technique can be successfully adopted with a cautious approach and as long as pitfalls are kept in mind, benefiting patients and healthcare systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":6959,"journal":{"name":"Acta Cytologica","volume":" ","pages":"206-218"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141305067","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Message from the International Academy of Cytology. 来自国际细胞学学会的信息。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-25 DOI: 10.1159/000542042
{"title":"Message from the International Academy of Cytology.","authors":"","doi":"10.1159/000542042","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000542042","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":6959,"journal":{"name":"Acta Cytologica","volume":"68 5","pages":"494"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142492681","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Efficacy of Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology in Diagnosing Secretory Carcinoma of Salivary Gland: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 细针穿刺细胞学诊断唾液腺分泌性癌的有效性:系统回顾与荟萃分析。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-16 DOI: 10.1159/000536249
Pooja Sharma Kala, Mamta Gupta, Naveen Thapliyal

Introduction: The diagnosis of salivary gland secretory carcinoma (SC) in fine-needle aspiration specimens is challenging because its low-grade nature makes it difficult to differentiate it from various benign or malignant salivary gland neoplasms. Currently, the gold standard is demonstration of ETV6-NTRK3 fusion gene. However, the decision for ordering this costly molecular testing can be facilitated by the correct recognition of its cytomorphological features. The aim of the review was to determine the accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in diagnosis of salivary gland SC. The secondary objective was to recognize varied cytomorphological patterns, characteristic features of SC and differentiate it from other neoplasms.

Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Direct, Embase, Cochrane review, and PROSPERO databases were searched for studies having the following key search terms: ("secretory carcinoma of salivary gland" OR "mammary analogue secretory carcinoma of salivary gland") AND ("Cytology" OR "Cytological features" OR "aspirate" OR "cytodiagnosis") published in the time frame of 2010 to June 2023. Studies reporting cytological features of the salivary gland tumors which were confirmed/diagnosed as SC on molecular investigation, were included in the systematic review. Finally, seventeen studies reporting a total of 45 cases were included in the metanalysis.

Results: The sensitivity of the FNAC in diagnosing SC in salivary gland is 27.7% (95% CI: 16.6-42.5%). The LR+ (positive likelihood ratio) was 0.654 (0.344-1.245), LR- (negative likelihood ratio) was 1.023 (0.538-1.946), and diagnostic odds ratio was 0.421 (0.129-1.374). The molecular testing and/or immunohistochemistry performed on cell block increased the diagnostic accuracy.

Conclusion: Recognition of subtle cytomorphological patterns, i.e., papillary formation, clusters, and singly dispersed cells along with presence of fine intracytoplasmic vacuolations were the characteristic findings in majority of cases, confirmed with diagnostic molecular profiling. This may be helpful in identification of this rare entity with limited published literature and help in increasing diagnostic accuracy.

背景:细针穿刺标本中唾液腺分泌性癌(SC)的诊断极具挑战性,因为它的低分化特性使其很难与各种良性或恶性唾液腺肿瘤相鉴别。目前,金标准是显示 ETV6-NTRK3 融合基因。然而,正确认识涎腺癌的细胞形态学特征有助于决定是否进行这种昂贵的分子检测:主要目的是确定细针穿刺细胞学(FNAC)诊断唾液腺 SC 的准确性。次要目的是识别不同的细胞形态学模式、SC 的特征并将其与其他肿瘤区分开来:方法:检索 PubMed/MEDLINE、Science Direct、Embase、Cochrane review 和 PROSPERO 数据库中 2010 年至 2023 年 6 月期间发表的、包含以下关键检索词的研究:("涎腺分泌性癌 "或 "涎腺乳腺类似分泌性癌")和("细胞学 "或 "细胞学特征 "或 "抽吸物 "或 "细胞诊断")。报告涎腺肿瘤细胞学特征并经分子检查证实/诊断为分泌性癌的研究被纳入系统综述。最后,17 项报告了 45 个病例的研究被纳入荟萃分析:FNAC诊断唾液腺分泌性癌的灵敏度为27.7%(95% CI16.6-42.5%)。LR+(阳性似然比)为0.654(0.344-1.245),LR-(阴性似然比)为1.023(0.538-1.946),诊断几率比为0.421(0.129-1.374)。在细胞块上进行分子检测和/或免疫组化可提高诊断准确率:结论:大多数病例的特征性发现是识别出细微的细胞形态学模式,即乳头状形成、细胞簇和单个分散的细胞,以及存在细小的胞浆内空泡,并经诊断性分子图谱分析证实。这可能有助于鉴别这种已发表文献有限的罕见疾病,并有助于提高诊断的准确性。
{"title":"Efficacy of Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology in Diagnosing Secretory Carcinoma of Salivary Gland: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Pooja Sharma Kala, Mamta Gupta, Naveen Thapliyal","doi":"10.1159/000536249","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000536249","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The diagnosis of salivary gland secretory carcinoma (SC) in fine-needle aspiration specimens is challenging because its low-grade nature makes it difficult to differentiate it from various benign or malignant salivary gland neoplasms. Currently, the gold standard is demonstration of ETV6-NTRK3 fusion gene. However, the decision for ordering this costly molecular testing can be facilitated by the correct recognition of its cytomorphological features. The aim of the review was to determine the accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in diagnosis of salivary gland SC. The secondary objective was to recognize varied cytomorphological patterns, characteristic features of SC and differentiate it from other neoplasms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Direct, Embase, Cochrane review, and PROSPERO databases were searched for studies having the following key search terms: (\"secretory carcinoma of salivary gland\" OR \"mammary analogue secretory carcinoma of salivary gland\") AND (\"Cytology\" OR \"Cytological features\" OR \"aspirate\" OR \"cytodiagnosis\") published in the time frame of 2010 to June 2023. Studies reporting cytological features of the salivary gland tumors which were confirmed/diagnosed as SC on molecular investigation, were included in the systematic review. Finally, seventeen studies reporting a total of 45 cases were included in the metanalysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sensitivity of the FNAC in diagnosing SC in salivary gland is 27.7% (95% CI: 16.6-42.5%). The LR+ (positive likelihood ratio) was 0.654 (0.344-1.245), LR- (negative likelihood ratio) was 1.023 (0.538-1.946), and diagnostic odds ratio was 0.421 (0.129-1.374). The molecular testing and/or immunohistochemistry performed on cell block increased the diagnostic accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Recognition of subtle cytomorphological patterns, i.e., papillary formation, clusters, and singly dispersed cells along with presence of fine intracytoplasmic vacuolations were the characteristic findings in majority of cases, confirmed with diagnostic molecular profiling. This may be helpful in identification of this rare entity with limited published literature and help in increasing diagnostic accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":6959,"journal":{"name":"Acta Cytologica","volume":" ","pages":"83-106"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139477805","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pitfalls in Salivary Gland Cytology. 唾液腺细胞学的陷阱。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-28 DOI: 10.1159/000538069
Carla Saoud, Gabrielle E Bailey, Ashleigh Graham, Lorena Marcano Bonilla, Sandra Ixchel Sanchez, Zahra Maleki

Background: Salivary gland lesions possess diagnostic challenges on fine-needle aspiration (FNA) material. They are relatively uncommon, yet present with a wide spectrum of cytomorphology. Herein, we review common salivary gland neoplasms, their cytomorphologic features, their diagnostic pitfalls, and ancillary studies helpful in achieving an accurate diagnosis.

Summary: There are many cytomorphologic overlaps between benign and malignant salivary gland entities. Moreover, metaplasia, cystic changes, and degenerative changes are common findings adding to diagnostic dilemmas. These complicating factors contribute to a minute risk of malignancy in salivary gland lesions that are interpreted as benign on FNA. In rare cases, even malignant salivary gland neoplasms are misinterpreted as benign on aspirated material due to the many cytomorphologic overlaps. For example, benign and malignant neoplasms containing stroma such as myoepithelioma and adenoid cystic carcinoma may be misinterpreted as pleomorphic adenoma. Moreover, diagnosis of salivary gland neoplasms with basal cell features can be confusing on FNA materials; for example, basal cell adenoma can be misinterpreted as adenoid cystic carcinoma. Mucoepidermoid carcinomas have many different appearances on aspirated material due to variable amounts of mucin, degree of nuclear atypia, cellular content, and squamous metaplasia. Acinic cell carcinoma exhibits large cells with abundant cytoplasm on FNA, which can be mistaken for oncocytic cells in oncocytoma or Warthin tumor. Salivary duct carcinoma shows distinct features of malignancy and thus can be mistaken for secondary tumors involving the salivary glands or other malignant salivary gland tumors. The presence of tumor-associated lymphocytes is another underlying cause of misdiagnosis, especially when considering the differential diagnosis of an intraparotid lymph node. Ancillary studies such as immunohistochemistry and molecular studies are gaining more attention to be utilized on FNA cases. PLAG1 immunostaining, CD117, DOG1, mammaglobin, and androgen receptor (AR) are examples of commonly used immunostains in diagnosis of salivary gland lesions. MYB gene fusion, rearrangements of the MAML2 gene, and ERBB2/HER2 are examples of molecular alterations useful in diagnosis of salivary gland neoplasms. In conclusion, the aim of salivary gland cytology is to differentiate benign entities from the malignant ones and to prevent unnecessary aggressive treatments.

Key messages: The diagnostic pitfalls are enormous in salivary gland cytology. Familiarity with cytomorphology of different entities and their cytomorphologic overlaps, and application of ancillary studies improves the diagnostic yield, patient management and prevents unnecessary aggressive procedures.

背景:唾液腺病变是细针穿刺(FNA)材料诊断的难题。它们相对来说并不常见,但在细胞形态学上却有广泛的表现。在此,我们将回顾常见的唾液腺肿瘤、其细胞形态学特征、诊断误区以及有助于获得准确诊断的辅助检查。此外,化生、囊性变和退行性变也是常见的检查结果,从而增加了诊断的难度。这些复杂因素导致在 FNA 中被解释为良性的唾液腺病变极有可能发生恶变。在极少数情况下,由于许多细胞形态学重叠,即使是恶性唾液腺肿瘤也会被误诊为良性。例如,含有基质的良性和恶性肿瘤(如肌上皮瘤和腺样囊性癌)可能会被误诊为多形性腺瘤。此外,诊断具有基底细胞特征的唾液腺肿瘤时,FNA 材料可能会造成混淆;例如,基底细胞腺瘤可能会被误诊为腺样囊性癌。黏液表皮样癌由于黏蛋白含量、核不典型程度、细胞含量和鳞状化生程度不同,在抽吸物上的表现也多种多样。醋酸细胞癌在 FNA 上表现为具有丰富细胞质的大细胞,这可能会被误认为是肿瘤细胞瘤或 Warthin 肿瘤中的肿瘤细胞。唾液腺导管癌表现出明显的恶性特征,因此可能被误认为是唾液腺继发性肿瘤或其他唾液腺恶性肿瘤。肿瘤相关淋巴细胞的存在是误诊的另一个潜在原因,尤其是在考虑腮腺内淋巴结的鉴别诊断时。免疫组化和分子研究等辅助研究越来越多地被用于 FNA 病例。PLAG1免疫染色、CD117、DOG1、乳球蛋白和雄激素受体(AR)是诊断唾液腺病变常用的免疫染色。MYB基因融合、MAML2基因重排和ERBB2/HER2是诊断涎腺肿瘤的分子改变实例。总之,涎腺细胞学检查的目的是区分良性和恶性肿瘤,避免不必要的侵略性治疗。
{"title":"Pitfalls in Salivary Gland Cytology.","authors":"Carla Saoud, Gabrielle E Bailey, Ashleigh Graham, Lorena Marcano Bonilla, Sandra Ixchel Sanchez, Zahra Maleki","doi":"10.1159/000538069","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000538069","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Salivary gland lesions possess diagnostic challenges on fine-needle aspiration (FNA) material. They are relatively uncommon, yet present with a wide spectrum of cytomorphology. Herein, we review common salivary gland neoplasms, their cytomorphologic features, their diagnostic pitfalls, and ancillary studies helpful in achieving an accurate diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>There are many cytomorphologic overlaps between benign and malignant salivary gland entities. Moreover, metaplasia, cystic changes, and degenerative changes are common findings adding to diagnostic dilemmas. These complicating factors contribute to a minute risk of malignancy in salivary gland lesions that are interpreted as benign on FNA. In rare cases, even malignant salivary gland neoplasms are misinterpreted as benign on aspirated material due to the many cytomorphologic overlaps. For example, benign and malignant neoplasms containing stroma such as myoepithelioma and adenoid cystic carcinoma may be misinterpreted as pleomorphic adenoma. Moreover, diagnosis of salivary gland neoplasms with basal cell features can be confusing on FNA materials; for example, basal cell adenoma can be misinterpreted as adenoid cystic carcinoma. Mucoepidermoid carcinomas have many different appearances on aspirated material due to variable amounts of mucin, degree of nuclear atypia, cellular content, and squamous metaplasia. Acinic cell carcinoma exhibits large cells with abundant cytoplasm on FNA, which can be mistaken for oncocytic cells in oncocytoma or Warthin tumor. Salivary duct carcinoma shows distinct features of malignancy and thus can be mistaken for secondary tumors involving the salivary glands or other malignant salivary gland tumors. The presence of tumor-associated lymphocytes is another underlying cause of misdiagnosis, especially when considering the differential diagnosis of an intraparotid lymph node. Ancillary studies such as immunohistochemistry and molecular studies are gaining more attention to be utilized on FNA cases. PLAG1 immunostaining, CD117, DOG1, mammaglobin, and androgen receptor (AR) are examples of commonly used immunostains in diagnosis of salivary gland lesions. MYB gene fusion, rearrangements of the MAML2 gene, and ERBB2/HER2 are examples of molecular alterations useful in diagnosis of salivary gland neoplasms. In conclusion, the aim of salivary gland cytology is to differentiate benign entities from the malignant ones and to prevent unnecessary aggressive treatments.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>The diagnostic pitfalls are enormous in salivary gland cytology. Familiarity with cytomorphology of different entities and their cytomorphologic overlaps, and application of ancillary studies improves the diagnostic yield, patient management and prevents unnecessary aggressive procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":6959,"journal":{"name":"Acta Cytologica","volume":" ","pages":"194-205"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139989041","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reproducibility of the Paris System in Urine Cytology by Third-Year Pathology Residents. 病理科三年级住院医师尿液细胞学中巴黎系统的再现性。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-24 DOI: 10.1159/000540533
Gamze Kavas, Asena Demiröz, Sinem Eser Polat Unal, Ahmet Cahit Calışkan, Gözde Ilhan, Betül Celik

Introduction: Standardized basic morphology and the algorithmic approach make the Paris System (TPS) for Reporting Urinary Cytology understandable and applicable. This study examined how well the TPS categories are understood by pathology residents and how well these criteria are enabling them reaching accurate diagnosis.

Materials/methods: A hundred consecutive cases representing all categories were selected. Authors reevaluated slides using TPS regardless of their original diagnosis. In the next step, the TPS was explained to four residents and trained them by five optimal urine cytology samples from each category. Then they were asked to diagnose the selected slides according to the TPS. The diagnoses were compared to authors. The agreement was assessed using kappa. Discordant diagnoses were classified as high and low impact based on potential on clinical practice.

Results: The sensitivity of authors was 62.8%, and residents' were 24-31.8%. The specificity of authors was 98.8%, and residents' were 82.3-92.8%. Reproducibility of TPS was 40-46%. Kappa values were below 0.40 except for one resident. The highest rate of concordance was for negative for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (NHGUC): authors assigned 38 NHGUC (35 biopsy-proven benign cases). Twenty to twenty-six of them were assigned as NHGUC by residents. While authors assigned 42 cases as suspicious for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (SHGUC) or high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC) (35 biopsy-proven malignant cases), residents assigned 22-29 of them. Discordant diagnosis with high clinical implication was 56-63%.

Conclusion: Diagnostic accuracy rates of junior pathology residents using the TPS were unsatisfactory. The best agreement was observed in NHGUC and HGUC categories. Combining HGUC and SHGUC doubled the sensitivity of residents.

导言:标准化的基本形态学和算法使巴黎尿液细胞学报告系统(TPS)易于理解和应用。在此,我们研究了病理科住院医师对 TPS 分类的理解程度,以及这些标准如何帮助他们做出准确诊断。材料/方法 选取了代表所有类别的 100 个连续病例。作者使用 TPS 对切片进行了重新评估,无论其最初的诊断结果如何。下一步,作者向四名住院医师讲解了 TPS,并从每个类别中挑选了五份最佳尿液细胞学样本对他们进行了培训。然后要求他们根据 TPS 对所选切片进行诊断。诊断结果与作者进行比较。采用卡帕法评估诊断结果的一致性。根据对临床实践的潜在影响,将不一致的诊断结果分为高影响和低影响。结果 作者的灵敏度为 62.8%,住院医师为 24-31.8%。作者的特异性为 98.8%,住院医师为 82.3-92.8%。TPS 的可重复性为 40-46%。除一名住院医师外,Kappa值均低于0.40。一致性最高的是阴性高级别尿路上皮癌(NHGUC):作者分配了 38 例 NHGUC(35 例经活检证实的良性病例)。其中 20 至 26 例由住院医师指定为 NHGUC。作者指定 42 例为 SHGUC 或 HGUC(35 例经活检证实的恶性病例),住院医师指定了其中的 22-29 例。临床影响较大的不一致诊断率为 56-63%。结论 初级病理住院医师使用 TPS 的诊断准确率并不令人满意。NHGUC和HGUC类别的一致性最好。结合 HGUC 和 SHGUC 可使住院医师的灵敏度提高一倍。
{"title":"Reproducibility of the Paris System in Urine Cytology by Third-Year Pathology Residents.","authors":"Gamze Kavas, Asena Demiröz, Sinem Eser Polat Unal, Ahmet Cahit Calışkan, Gözde Ilhan, Betül Celik","doi":"10.1159/000540533","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000540533","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Standardized basic morphology and the algorithmic approach make the Paris System (TPS) for Reporting Urinary Cytology understandable and applicable. This study examined how well the TPS categories are understood by pathology residents and how well these criteria are enabling them reaching accurate diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Materials/methods: </strong>A hundred consecutive cases representing all categories were selected. Authors reevaluated slides using TPS regardless of their original diagnosis. In the next step, the TPS was explained to four residents and trained them by five optimal urine cytology samples from each category. Then they were asked to diagnose the selected slides according to the TPS. The diagnoses were compared to authors. The agreement was assessed using kappa. Discordant diagnoses were classified as high and low impact based on potential on clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sensitivity of authors was 62.8%, and residents' were 24-31.8%. The specificity of authors was 98.8%, and residents' were 82.3-92.8%. Reproducibility of TPS was 40-46%. Kappa values were below 0.40 except for one resident. The highest rate of concordance was for negative for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (NHGUC): authors assigned 38 NHGUC (35 biopsy-proven benign cases). Twenty to twenty-six of them were assigned as NHGUC by residents. While authors assigned 42 cases as suspicious for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (SHGUC) or high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC) (35 biopsy-proven malignant cases), residents assigned 22-29 of them. Discordant diagnosis with high clinical implication was 56-63%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Diagnostic accuracy rates of junior pathology residents using the TPS were unsatisfactory. The best agreement was observed in NHGUC and HGUC categories. Combining HGUC and SHGUC doubled the sensitivity of residents.</p>","PeriodicalId":6959,"journal":{"name":"Acta Cytologica","volume":" ","pages":"465-471"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141756501","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Diagnostic Accuracy of Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System for Reporting Respiratory Cytology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 帕氏细胞病理学协会系统报告呼吸道细胞学的诊断准确性:系统回顾与元分析》。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-27 DOI: 10.1159/000541139
Sana Ahuja, Marzieh Fattahi-Darghlou, Sufian Zaheer, Rhea Ahuja

Introduction: This study conducts the first meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and the aggregated risk of malignancy associated with each category of the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) system for reporting respiratory cytology.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science using the keywords "(Lung, Respiratory specimens) AND (Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System)." Articles were assessed for risk of bias using the QUADAS-2 tool. After excluding inadequate samples, sensitivity and specificity for various cut-off points. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves and diagnostic odds ratios were pooled to assess diagnostic accuracy.

Results: Five studies, totaling 3,489 cases, were included. Sensitivity and specificity for the "Atypical and higher risk categories" considered positive were 60% (95% CI, 51-68%) and 87% (95% CI, 81-92%), respectively. For the "Suspicious for malignancy and higher risk categories" considered positive, sensitivity and specificity were 49% (95% CI, 40-58%) and 95% (95% CI, 92-97%), respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for the "Malignant" category considered positive for malignancy were 42% (95% CI, 33-52%) and 97% (95% CI, 92-99%), respectively. The pooled area under the curve ranged from 68 to 75% for each cut-off.

Conclusion: This meta-analysis underscores the PSC system's accuracy in reporting respiratory cytology. It highlights the diagnostic importance of the "Suspicious" and "Malignant" categories in identifying malignancy, and the utility of the "Atypical" category for initial screening. These findings support the PSC system's role in enhancing diagnostic accuracy and clinical decision-making in respiratory cytology.

引言 本研究首次进行了荟萃分析,以评估用于报告呼吸道细胞学检查的巴氏细胞病理学会(PSC)系统各分类的诊断准确性和恶性肿瘤的总体风险。方法 使用关键词"(肺、呼吸道标本)和(巴氏细胞病理学协会系统)"在 PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science 中进行系统检索。使用 QUADAS-2 工具对文章进行偏倚风险评估。剔除不充分样本后,确定不同截断点的敏感性和特异性。汇总接收者操作特征曲线(sROC)和诊断几率比(DOR)以评估诊断准确性。结果 共纳入了五项研究,共计 3489 个病例。被视为阳性的 "非典型和高风险类别 "的敏感性和特异性分别为 60%(95% CI,51%-68%)和 87%(95% CI,81%-92%)。在 "恶性肿瘤可疑和高风险类别 "中,阳性的敏感性和特异性分别为 49%(95% CI,40%-58%)和 95%(95% CI,92%-97%)。恶性 "类别的敏感性和特异性分别为 42%(95% CI,33%-52%)和 97%(95% CI,92%-99%)。每个临界值的集合曲线下面积(AUC)介于 68% 到 75% 之间。结论 该荟萃分析强调了 PSC 系统在报告呼吸道细胞学方面的准确性。它强调了 "可疑 "和 "恶性 "类别在确定恶性肿瘤方面的诊断重要性,以及 "非典型 "类别在初步筛查方面的实用性。这些研究结果支持 PSC 系统在提高呼吸道细胞学诊断准确性和临床决策方面的作用。
{"title":"Diagnostic Accuracy of Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System for Reporting Respiratory Cytology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Sana Ahuja, Marzieh Fattahi-Darghlou, Sufian Zaheer, Rhea Ahuja","doi":"10.1159/000541139","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000541139","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study conducts the first meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and the aggregated risk of malignancy associated with each category of the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) system for reporting respiratory cytology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science using the keywords \"(Lung, Respiratory specimens) AND (Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System).\" Articles were assessed for risk of bias using the QUADAS-2 tool. After excluding inadequate samples, sensitivity and specificity for various cut-off points. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves and diagnostic odds ratios were pooled to assess diagnostic accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies, totaling 3,489 cases, were included. Sensitivity and specificity for the \"Atypical and higher risk categories\" considered positive were 60% (95% CI, 51-68%) and 87% (95% CI, 81-92%), respectively. For the \"Suspicious for malignancy and higher risk categories\" considered positive, sensitivity and specificity were 49% (95% CI, 40-58%) and 95% (95% CI, 92-97%), respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for the \"Malignant\" category considered positive for malignancy were 42% (95% CI, 33-52%) and 97% (95% CI, 92-99%), respectively. The pooled area under the curve ranged from 68 to 75% for each cut-off.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis underscores the PSC system's accuracy in reporting respiratory cytology. It highlights the diagnostic importance of the \"Suspicious\" and \"Malignant\" categories in identifying malignancy, and the utility of the \"Atypical\" category for initial screening. These findings support the PSC system's role in enhancing diagnostic accuracy and clinical decision-making in respiratory cytology.</p>","PeriodicalId":6959,"journal":{"name":"Acta Cytologica","volume":" ","pages":"450-464"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142078780","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Novel Validated Real-World Dataset for the Diagnosis of Multiclass Serous Effusion Cytology according to the International System and Ground-Truth Validation Data. 根据 TIS 和地面实况验证数据诊断多类浆液性渗出细胞学的新型验证真实世界数据集。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PATHOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-24 DOI: 10.1159/000538465
Esraa Abd-Almoniem, Nadia Abd-Alsabour, Samar Elsheikh, Rasha R Mostafa, Yasmine Fathy Elesawy

Introduction: The application of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms in serous fluid cytology is lacking due to the deficiency in standardized publicly available datasets. Here, we develop a novel public serous effusion cytology dataset. Furthermore, we apply AI algorithms on it to test its diagnostic utility and safety in clinical practice.

Methods: The work is divided into three phases. Phase 1 entails building the dataset based on the multitiered evidence-based classification system proposed by the International System (TIS) of serous fluid cytology along with ground-truth tissue diagnosis for malignancy. To ensure reliable results of future AI research on this dataset, we carefully consider all the steps of the preparation and staining from a real-world cytopathology perspective. In phase 2, we pay special consideration to the image acquisition pipeline to ensure image integrity. Then we utilize the power of transfer learning using the convolutional layers of the VGG16 deep learning model for feature extraction. Finally, in phase 3, we apply the random forest classifier on the constructed dataset.

Results: The dataset comprises 3,731 images distributed among the four TIS diagnostic categories. The model achieves 74% accuracy in this multiclass classification problem. Using a one-versus-all classifier, the fallout rate for images that are misclassified as negative for malignancy despite being a higher risk diagnosis is 0.13. Most of these misclassified images (77%) belong to the atypia of undetermined significance category in concordance with real-life statistics.

Conclusion: This is the first and largest publicly available serous fluid cytology dataset based on a standardized diagnostic system. It is also the first dataset to include various types of effusions and pericardial fluid specimens. In addition, it is the first dataset to include the diagnostically challenging atypical categories. AI algorithms applied on this novel dataset show reliable results that can be incorporated into actual clinical practice with minimal risk of missing a diagnosis of malignancy. This work provides a foundation for researchers to develop and test further AI algorithms for the diagnosis of serous effusions.

简介由于缺乏标准化的公开数据集,人工智能算法在浆液细胞学中的应用十分匮乏。在此,我们开发了一个新的公共浆液细胞学数据集。此外,我们还将人工智能算法应用于该数据集,以测试其在临床实践中的诊断实用性和安全性:工作分为三个阶段。第一阶段是根据国际浆液细胞学系统(TIS)提出的多层循证分类系统以及恶性肿瘤的基本组织诊断建立数据集。为确保未来人工智能研究在该数据集上取得可靠的结果,我们从现实世界细胞病理学的角度出发,仔细考虑了制备和染色的所有步骤。在第二阶段,我们对图像采集管道进行了特别考虑,以确保图像的完整性。然后,我们利用 VGG16 深度学习模型卷积层的迁移学习能力进行特征提取。最后,在第 3 阶段,我们在构建的数据集上应用随机森林分类器:该数据集包含 3731 张图像,分布在四个 TIS 诊断类别中。该模型在这一多类分类问题上达到了 74% 的准确率。使用 "一个对所有 "分类器,尽管诊断风险较高,但被误判为阴性恶性肿瘤的图像的漏判率为 0.13。这些被误判的图像中,大部分(77%)属于意义不明的非典型,与现实生活中的统计数据相符:这是首个基于标准化诊断系统的最大的公开浆液细胞学数据集。这也是第一个包含各种类型渗出液的数据集,也是第一个包含心包积液标本的数据集。此外,它还是首个包含具有诊断挑战性的非典型类别的数据集。在这一新型数据集上应用的人工智能算法显示出可靠的结果,可用于实际临床实践,将漏诊恶性肿瘤的风险降至最低。这项工作为研究人员进一步开发和测试用于诊断浆液性渗出液的人工智能算法奠定了基础。
{"title":"A Novel Validated Real-World Dataset for the Diagnosis of Multiclass Serous Effusion Cytology according to the International System and Ground-Truth Validation Data.","authors":"Esraa Abd-Almoniem, Nadia Abd-Alsabour, Samar Elsheikh, Rasha R Mostafa, Yasmine Fathy Elesawy","doi":"10.1159/000538465","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000538465","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The application of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms in serous fluid cytology is lacking due to the deficiency in standardized publicly available datasets. Here, we develop a novel public serous effusion cytology dataset. Furthermore, we apply AI algorithms on it to test its diagnostic utility and safety in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The work is divided into three phases. Phase 1 entails building the dataset based on the multitiered evidence-based classification system proposed by the International System (TIS) of serous fluid cytology along with ground-truth tissue diagnosis for malignancy. To ensure reliable results of future AI research on this dataset, we carefully consider all the steps of the preparation and staining from a real-world cytopathology perspective. In phase 2, we pay special consideration to the image acquisition pipeline to ensure image integrity. Then we utilize the power of transfer learning using the convolutional layers of the VGG16 deep learning model for feature extraction. Finally, in phase 3, we apply the random forest classifier on the constructed dataset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The dataset comprises 3,731 images distributed among the four TIS diagnostic categories. The model achieves 74% accuracy in this multiclass classification problem. Using a one-versus-all classifier, the fallout rate for images that are misclassified as negative for malignancy despite being a higher risk diagnosis is 0.13. Most of these misclassified images (77%) belong to the atypia of undetermined significance category in concordance with real-life statistics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first and largest publicly available serous fluid cytology dataset based on a standardized diagnostic system. It is also the first dataset to include various types of effusions and pericardial fluid specimens. In addition, it is the first dataset to include the diagnostically challenging atypical categories. AI algorithms applied on this novel dataset show reliable results that can be incorporated into actual clinical practice with minimal risk of missing a diagnosis of malignancy. This work provides a foundation for researchers to develop and test further AI algorithms for the diagnosis of serous effusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":6959,"journal":{"name":"Acta Cytologica","volume":" ","pages":"160-170"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140206160","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Acta Cytologica
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1