Acta Cytologica最新文献

Background: Up until recently, cervical cytology was the mainstay for cervical cancer screening. However, the established association between human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and cervical cancer has led to changes in preventive strategies, with cytology being replaced by the use of high-risk HPV (hrHPV) testing and primary prevention being achieved by HPV vaccination. In this context, the role of cervical cytology is shifting to secondary triage of HPV-positive women. As vaccination is leading to decreased HPV infections and significant cervical abnormalities (CIN2+), data on the impact of HPV vaccination on cervical cytology metrics, including positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV), are starting to emerge.

Summary: This is a review of updates in cervical cancer screening, including the use of primary HPV testing and the impact of HPV vaccination on cytology as part of cervical cancer screening.

Key messages: Cervical cancer screening and prevention are undergoing significant changes as there is widespread implementation of HPV vaccination and hrHPV testing is becoming the entry point for secondary prevention. Optimal screening approaches and intervals in this setting are currently being analyzed including the use of cytology and other ancillary techniques for triage of positive cases, as well as the effect of vaccination on the PPV and NPV of cytology in the detection of CIN2+.

Background: Squamous intraepithelial lesions observed in Papanicolaou (Pap) test gynecologic cytology arise as a result of infection of the cervicovaginal tract by human papillomavirus (HPV). The viral cytopathic effect of HPV manifests as koilocytosis, also known as low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) in The Bethesda System (TBS). Integration of HPV genetic material into the genome of squamous cells can, in some women, result in progressive accumulation of mutations and abnormalities of growth and maturation leading to high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and possibly invasive squamous cell carcinoma. Due to morphologic overlap between reactive processes and these changes related to HPV, TBS includes equivocal categories that may be applied to Pap tests with uncertain morphology: atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and atypical squamous cells cannot exclude HSIL (ASC-H). Quality assurance (QA) measures in gynecologic cytology laboratories aim to maximize the sensitivity for LSIL and HSIL lesions while simultaneously keeping the use of ASC-US at reasonable levels.

Summary: TBS provides a comprehensive nomenclature for squamous abnormalities encountered in screening, but subjectivity in interpretation remains. QA practices attempt to identify problematic patterns of misinterpretation for correction.

Key message: This review aimed to provide practical recommendations for cytology practitioners seeking to alter their interpretive thresholds for ASC-US, LSIL, and HSIL in response to feedback from QA procedures indicating deviation from desired norms.

Introduction: Fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) is a routinely used investigation in the evaluation of lymph node pathologies. However, there exists a lack of uniformity in cytopathology reporting owing to the nonavailability of standard guidelines. Recently, a novel system for reporting lymph node cytopathology has been proposed. The present study aimed to analyze the utility of the proposed system in cytopathology reporting in our institution.

Materials: FNABs of lymph nodes performed over a period of 5 years were categorized as per the proposed Sydney system. The diagnoses on cytopathology were correlated with histopathologic diagnoses to assess the diagnostic accuracy. The rate of malignancy (ROM) for each category was calculated.

Results: A total of 747 lymph node FNABs were included in the study. Histopathology was available in 262 cases. ROM in categories I-V was 26.3%, 7.2%, 76.9%, 82.3%, and 100.0%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of FNAB when considering category L3 to represent benign cytopathology were 84.2%, 97.5%, 97.1%, and 86.2%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of FNAB when considering category L3 to represent malignant cytopathology were 92.56%, 95.08%, 94.9%, and 92.8%, respectively.

Conclusion: The study substantiates the usefulness of the proposed Sydney system in lymph node cytopathology in enhancing better communication between clinicians and cytopathologists. The use of ancillary techniques like immunocytochemistry and flow cytometry will aid in arriving at a more precise diagnosis.

Introduction: Asbestos is a global occupational health hazard, and exposure to it by inhalation predisposes to interstitial as well as malignant pulmonary morbidity. Over time, asbestos fibers embedded in lung tissue can become coated with iron-rich proteins and mucopolysaccharides, after which they are called asbestos bodies (ABs) and can be detected in light microscopy (LM). Bronchoalveolar lavage, a cytological sample from the lower airways, is one of the methods for diagnosing lung asbestosis and related morbidity. Search for ABs in these samples is generally laborious and time-consuming. We describe a novel diagnostic method, which implements deep learning neural network technology for the detection of ABs in bronchoalveolar lavage samples (BALs).

Methods: BALs with suspicion of asbestos exposure were scanned as whole slide images (WSIs) and uploaded to a cloud-based virtual microscopy platform with a neural network training interface. The images were used for training and testing a neural network model capable of recognizing ABs. To prioritize the model's sensitivity, we allowed it to also make false-positive suggestions. To test the model, we compared its performance to standard LM diagnostic data as well as the ground truth (GT) number of ABs, which we established by a thorough manual search of the WSIs.

Results: We were able to reach overall sensitivity of 93.4% (95% CI: 90.3-95.7%) in the detection of ABs in comparison to their GT number. Compared to standard LM diagnostic data, our model showed equal to or higher sensitivity in most cases.

Conclusion: Our results indicate that deep learning neural network technology offers promising diagnostic tools for routine assessment of BALs. However, at this stage, a human expert is required to confirm the findings.

Introduction: Regarding a small proportion of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) patients who tested p16-positive but human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative, we attempted to perform HPV testing to improve the accuracy of HPV detection in OPSCC patients.

Methods: We simultaneously performed Aptima HPV testing of cytological specimens and p16 immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining of histologic biopsies from the same cohort of patients with head and neck SCC (HNSCC). The cytological specimens included fine-needle aspiration specimens from patients with enlarged nodes and endoscopic brushing specimens from the primary lesions of patients without enlarged nodes. Cases with discordant results for p16 IHC staining and Aptima HPV testing were reexamined by a third method, RNAscope testing.

Results: Sixty patients with HNSCC (39 OPSCC and 21 non-OPSCC) were recruited for examination of HPV status. Among these patients, 28 were p16+/HPV+, 29 were p16-/HPV-, 2 were p16+/HPV-, and 1 was p16-/HPV+. The overall concordance rate between Aptima HPV testing and p16 IHC was 95.0%. Three cases with discordant results for these two methods were reexamined by RNAscope testing, and all were confirmed to be HPV negative. The prevalence of HPV in OPSCC and non-OPSCC patients was 61.5% (24/39) and 19.0% (4/21), respectively. The sensitivity and negative predictive values of Aptima HPV testing and p16 IHC were consistent at 100%, while the specificity and positive predictive values were 96.9% and 96.6% versus 93.8% and 93.3%, respectively. Additionally, 30 OPSCCs were simultaneously examined and diagnosed by both brush cytology and biopsy pathology; six of these SCCs were underdiagnosed by histopathology but accurately diagnosed by supplemental brush cytology.

Conclusion: Aptima HPV testing of cytology specimens can be used as an adjuvant examination to identify false-positive OPSCC patients after p16 IHC of biopsies, while brush cytology may be a supplemental method for the histologic diagnosis of malignant oropharyngeal tumors.

Introduction: The International Academy of Cytology and the American Society of Cytopathology recently proposed the International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytology (ISRSFC) to standardize serous fluid cytopathology reporting and guide further clinical management. The current study aimed to assess the feasibility of utilizing ISRSFC reporting categories for serous fluids, estimate the risk of malignancy (ROM) of each category, and scrutinize if the management protocols followed in our institution are as per the ISRFSFC recommendations.

Methods: All pleural, peritoneal, and pericardial effusions submitted for evaluation at our institute between January 2021 and December 2021 were retrieved. All these cases were reviewed and re-categorized into one of the five categories proposed by the ISRSFC: non-diagnostic (ND), negative for malignancy (NFM), atypia of uncertain significance (AUS), suspicious for malignancy (SFM), and malignant (MAL), and ROM was calculated for each category.

Results: The present study examined 596 serous effusions, of which 229 were pleural effusions, 358 were peritoneal effusions, and the remaining nine were pericardial effusions. Among 596 cases, 395 cases had a radiological or histological follow-up. The serous effusion samples were re-categorized as 61 (10.2%) ND, 449 (75.3%) NFM, 47 (7.8%) AUS, 17 (2.9%) SFM, and 22 (3.8%) MAL, and ROM for each above category were 10%, 4.4%, 19%, 83.3%, and 100%, respectively.

Conclusion: Categorizing serous effusion cytology samples per the ISRSFC diagnostic categories reduces reporting variability. The ISRSFC provides a standardized format to predict the ROM and thus improves the quality of clinical care.

Introduction: Thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is a well-established technique in the cytology literature. Through the introduction of rapid stains in cytology practice, the ever-increasing utility of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) has strengthened the place of FNA as a primary diagnostic method in patient management. There are few stain variants available in the market for ROSE, namely Diff-Quik (DQ), Toluidine blue, and ultrafast Papanicolaou stains. Recently, our group developed a new staining variant labeled as original "BlueStain®" technique that was not previously tested in this context.

Methods: 40 FNA thyroid cases were studied. At least two slides were prepared from each patient: one stained by DQ and the other by BlueStain®. Simultaneously, a ROSE diagnosis was performed as the two staining methods were compared, evaluating the parameters of background, cellularity, details of colloid presence, cell morphology, nuclear details, cytoplasmic details, and overall staining, scored on a scale from 1 to 3, representing poor, average, and good, respectively.

Results: The quality index was slightly better for BlueStain® (53% vs. 47%) but not significantly different between the two stains. BlueStain® provides better details in both the presence and type of colloid as well as nuclear details, which are regarded as very important for diagnosis in thyroid cytology. There were eight cases with discordant diagnosis when compared between two stains from the same patient. In five cases of indeterminate cases, BlueStain® allows to bring them to the benign category, probably because this staining method allows a clear observation of the colloid in the background of the smears. However, since we are observing two different slides, we cannot rule out that these differences are a question of sample collecting and/or smearing.

Conclusions: Our data demonstrates that BlueStain® is suitable to provide good-quality slides for primary assessments of thyroid aspirates studied by ROSE. In fact, in some aspects, this new staining method shows better preservation of colloid and cell details, revealing itself as an alternative to the DQ stain variant, upholding performance level while being 10 times cheaper and simpler because it requires just one step of staining.

Introduction: In most cases, the diagnostic workup of pleural mesotheliomas (MPMs) starts with cytological examination of pleural effusion, but histology is needed to confirm the diagnosis. The introduction of BAP1 and methylthio-adenosine phosphorylase (MTAP) immunohistochemistry has become a powerful tool to confirm the malignant nature of mesothelial proliferations also in cytological specimens. The objective of this study was to determine the concordance of BAP1, MTAP, and p16 expression between cytological and histological samples of patients with MPM.

Methods: Immunohistochemistry of BAP1, MTAP, and p16 was performed on cytological samples and compared with the corresponding histological specimen of 25 patients with MPM. Inflammatory and stromal cells served as positive internal control for all three markers. In addition, samples of 11 patients with reactive mesothelial proliferations served as an external control group.

Results: Loss of BAP1, MTAP, and p16 expression was found in 68%, 72%, and 92% of MPM, respectively. Loss of MTAP was associated with loss of p16 expression in all cases. Concordance of BAP1 between cytological and corresponding histological samples was 100% (kappa coefficient 1; p = 0.008). For MTAP and p16, kappa coefficient was 0.9 (p = 0.01) and 0.8 (p = 0.7788), respectively.

Conclusions: Concordant BAP1, MTAP, and p16 expression is found between cytological and corresponding histological samples, indicating that a reliable diagnosis of MPM can be made on cytology only. Of the three markers, BAP1 and MTAP are most reliable in distinguishing malignant from reactive mesothelial proliferations.

Introduction: Pulmonary spindle cell and mesenchymal lesions are paradox for pathologists due to their rarity, overlapping morphology, and differentials ranging from benign to malignant lesions, and correct diagnosis is essential due to major treatment implications. This study highlights the role of fine-needle aspiration cytology, clot core biopsy, and immunohistochemistry in diagnosis of spindle cell lesions in lung, thus playing a key role in patient management.

Methods: It is a retrospective study of lung FNA with predominantly spindle and mesenchymal cells from 2015-2020 which were classified cytomorphologically into spindle, epithelioid, small round cell, and biphasic, and IHC panels are applied accordingly. FNA from mediastinum and chest wall was excluded.

Results: 60 cases of lung FNA with spindle and mesenchymal cells were identified and included 6 benign and 54 malignancies which included 24 primary pulmonary malignancies and 30 metastases. Most common primary malignancy was sarcomatoid carcinoma, and most common metastasis was malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour. FNA was paucicellular in 7 cases and was reported as benign in 7 cases and malignant in 46 cases. There were two false-negative cases. One case of pulmonary blastoma was reported as inflammatory pseudotumour on cytology, and other case of chondrosarcoma was reported as chondroid tumour. Sensitivity and specificity of FNA in distinguishing benign lesions and malignancies were 93.8% and 100%, respectively.

Conclusion: FNA along with clot core biopsy/cell block and IHC plays a pivotal role in the subsequent pathway taken for diagnostic or therapeutic management of these patients without the need for second sampling or trucut biopsies in a low resource setting.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare performance of individual categories between the Johns Hopkins template and the Paris system for reporting urinary cytology.

Methods: Medical records of patients with bladder biopsy and relevant cytology slides were obtained from archived material. Slides were reclassified according to Johns Hopkins template and the Paris system. Results were compared to histological diagnoses.

Results: BD SurePath preparations from 205 cases with biopsy follow-up (118 benign, 5 dysplasia, 23 low, and 59 malignant urothelial carcinoma [UC]) were reviewed. There were 2 inadequate specimens in each system. According to the Johns Hopkins template, there were 96 (46.8%) no urothelial atypia or malignancy, 37 (18%) atypical urothelial cells of uncertain significance (AUC-US), 21 (10.2%) atypical urothelial cells, cannot exclude high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC), 38 (18.5%) HGUC, and 11 (5.4%) low-grade urothelial carcinoma (LGUC). The Paris system categorized 111 (54.1%) negative for high-grade urothelial carcinoma, 29 (14.1%) atypical urothelial cells (AUCs), 25 (12.2%) suspicious for HGUC (SHGUC), 36 (17.6%) HGUC, and 2 (1%) LGUC. The Johns Hopkins template had a sensitivity of 95.6%, specificity of 73.6%, positive predictive value of 61.5%, negative predictive value of 96.3, with an overall diagnostic accuracy of 79.8%. The Paris System had a sensitivity of 93.6%, specificity of 77.9%, positive predictive value of 65.6%, negative predictive value of 96.5, with an overall diagnostic accuracy of 82.8%. The risk of malignancy (ROM) for atypical category (AUC-US/AUC) in the Johns Hopkins template was 43.2%, while it has been 24.1% for the Paris System. The ROM for suspicious category was 47.6% and 68.0%, respectively. There were statistically significant differences between negative and atypical, suspicious, and HGUC categories in each system (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Discrete negative or benign urine cytology had the same sensitivity and specificity between two systems. Although atypical category was associated with a higher ROM with the Hopkins template, the ROM for the suspicious category yielded better result with the Paris system.