首页 > 最新文献

Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation最新文献

英文 中文
Optimizing Pulmonary Health and Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial Combining Incentive Spirometry and Aerobic Exercise 优化乳腺癌幸存者的肺部健康和生活质量:一项结合激励肺活量测定和有氧运动的随机对照试验
IF 1.9 Q2 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100449
Dian Marta Sari MD, MSc, PhD , Irma Ruslina Defi MD, PhD , Andre Maharadja MD , Nurvita Trianasari M.Stat, PhD , Laurentia Cindy Gani Wijaya MD , Patricia Helena Christiani Santoso MD , Geraldi Christian Candra MD

Objective

To investigate the combined effect of aerobic and breathing exercises using incentive spirometry on lung function and quality of life (QoL) in patients with breast cancer after radiation therapy (RT).

Design

A single-blind, randomized controlled trial.

Setting

Hasan Sadikin General Hospital Bandung.

Participants

Thirty-seven women aged 40-59 years post-RT breast cancer survivors divided into treatment (18 subjects) and control (19 subjects) groups.

Intervention

The treatment group engaged in thrice-weekly sessions of aerobic and breathing exercises using incentive spirometry, whereas the control group performed only aerobic exercises at the same frequency. Lung function was assessed using spirometry, and QoL was evaluated using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Questionnaires-Core30 (EORTC QLQ C30), both conducted before and after the exercise.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Lung function (assessed using spirometry) and QoL (measured using the EORTC QLQ C30).

Results

Between-group analyses revealed that the treatment group experienced significantly greater improvements than the control group in lung function (forced vital capacity increased by 7.72±3.51 vs. 3.45±1.22, P<.05), physical function (difference of 8.06±5.76 vs. 0.68±2.06, P<.05), dyspnea (difference of −22.22±22.92 vs. 0.00, P<.05), and fatigue (difference of −22.78±20.39 vs. −1.74±5.52, P<.05), with these improvements being clinically meaningful.

Conclusions

The addition of breathing exercises with incentive spirometry to aerobic exercise may improve lung function and QoL in patients with breast cancer who have completed RT.
目的探讨激励性肺活量测定法联合有氧运动和呼吸运动对乳腺癌放疗后患者肺功能和生活质量的影响。设计一项单盲、随机对照试验。万隆哈桑·萨迪金总医院。参与者37名年龄在40-59岁的乳腺癌放疗后幸存者分为治疗组(18名受试者)和对照组(19名受试者)。干预治疗组每周进行三次有氧和呼吸运动,使用刺激肺活量测定法,而对照组只进行相同频率的有氧运动。使用肺活量测定法评估肺功能,使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织QoL问卷- core30 (EORTC QLQ C30)评估生活质量,均在运动前后进行。主要观察指标:肺功能(肺活量测定法)和生活质量(EORTC QLQ C30)。结果组间分析显示,治疗组在肺功能(用力肺活量增加7.72±3.51比3.45±1.22,P< 0.05)、身体功能(差异为8.06±5.76比0.68±2.06,P< 0.05)、呼吸困难(差异为- 22.22±22.92比0.00,P< 0.05)、疲劳(差异为- 22.78±20.39比- 1.74±5.52,P< 0.05)方面的改善均显著高于对照组,具有临床意义。结论在有氧运动的基础上加入激励性肺活量测定呼吸运动可改善乳腺癌患者完成RT后的肺功能和生活质量。
{"title":"Optimizing Pulmonary Health and Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial Combining Incentive Spirometry and Aerobic Exercise","authors":"Dian Marta Sari MD, MSc, PhD ,&nbsp;Irma Ruslina Defi MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Andre Maharadja MD ,&nbsp;Nurvita Trianasari M.Stat, PhD ,&nbsp;Laurentia Cindy Gani Wijaya MD ,&nbsp;Patricia Helena Christiani Santoso MD ,&nbsp;Geraldi Christian Candra MD","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100449","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100449","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate the combined effect of aerobic and breathing exercises using incentive spirometry on lung function and quality of life (QoL) in patients with breast cancer after radiation therapy (RT).</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A single-blind, randomized controlled trial.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Hasan Sadikin General Hospital Bandung.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Thirty-seven women aged 40-59 years post-RT breast cancer survivors divided into treatment (18 subjects) and control (19 subjects) groups.</div></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><div>The treatment group engaged in thrice-weekly sessions of aerobic and breathing exercises using incentive spirometry, whereas the control group performed only aerobic exercises at the same frequency. Lung function was assessed using spirometry, and QoL was evaluated using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Questionnaires-Core30 (EORTC QLQ C30), both conducted before and after the exercise.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measure(s)</h3><div>Lung function (assessed using spirometry) and QoL (measured using the EORTC QLQ C30).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between-group analyses revealed that the treatment group experienced significantly greater improvements than the control group in lung function (forced vital capacity increased by 7.72±3.51 vs. 3.45±1.22, <em>P</em>&lt;.05), physical function (difference of 8.06±5.76 vs. 0.68±2.06, <em>P</em>&lt;.05), dyspnea (difference of −22.22±22.92 vs. 0.00, <em>P</em>&lt;.05), and fatigue (difference of −22.78±20.39 vs. −1.74±5.52, <em>P</em>&lt;.05), with these improvements being clinically meaningful.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The addition of breathing exercises with incentive spirometry to aerobic exercise may improve lung function and QoL in patients with breast cancer who have completed RT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"7 2","pages":"Article 100449"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144222111","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Validation of the Fiberoptic Endoscopy Evaluation of Swallowing in Aspiration Pneumonia: Utility of the Hyodo Dysphagia Score in Predicting the Development of Aspiration Pneumonia 纤维内窥镜对吸入性肺炎吞咽评估的验证:Hyodo吞咽困难评分在预测吸入性肺炎发展中的应用
IF 1.9 Q2 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100435
Yoko Ibe MD, PhD , Masayuki Tazawa MD, PhD , Hironori Arii MD, PhD , Yumiko Nakao MD, PhD , Risa Toyama MD , Naoki Wada MD, PhD

Objective

To analyze the characteristics of flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) findings in patients with aspiration pneumonia using the Hyodo dysphagia score and to evaluate the risk of aspiration pneumonia.

Design

Retrospective study.

Setting

Observation in a single primary care institution.

Participants

Inpatients aged ≥20 years who underwent FEES in our hospital between April 2012 and March 2022. A total of 178 patients were eligible to calculate the Hyodo dysphagia score and were enrolled in this study. The mean ± SD age of the subjects was 73.4±13.3 years, and 116 of 178 patients (65.2%) were men.

Intervention

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

The development of aspiration pneumonia.

Results

Eighty-four of 178 patients (47.2%) developed aspiration pneumonia. Age, oral intake status, and serum albumin levels were not significantly different between the pneumonia and nonpneumonia groups. The total and each parameter of the Hyodo dysphagia score were significantly higher in the pneumonia group than in the nonpneumonia group. Logistic regression analysis showed that salivary retention (odds ratio [OR], 1.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-1.33; P=.016) and poor cough reflex (OR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.42-2.49; P<.001) in the Hyodo dysphagia score were risk factors for aspiration pneumonia. The area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curve for the onset of pneumonia based on the total Hyodo dysphagia score was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.67-0.82). A cutoff value of 5 for the total Hyodo dysphagia score gave a sensitivity of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.67-0.83) and a specificity of 0.60 (95% CI, 0.49-0.71), with the Youden index having a maximum value of 0.35.

Conclusions

A cutoff value of 5 points for the total Hyodo dysphagia score was optimal in predicting the development of aspiration pneumonia. Salivary retention and poor cough reflex were risk factors for the development of pneumonia.
目的应用Hyodo吞咽困难评分分析吸入性肺炎患者柔性内镜吞咽检查(FEES)的特点,评价吸入性肺炎的发生风险。DesignRetrospective研究。在单一的初级保健机构观察。参与者为2012年4月至2022年3月期间在我院接受FEES治疗的年龄≥20岁的患者。共有178名患者符合计算Hyodo吞咽困难评分的条件,并被纳入本研究。受试者的平均±SD年龄为73.4±13.3岁,178例患者中116例(65.2%)为男性。InterventionNot适用。主要观察指标吸入性肺炎的发生。结果178例患者中84例(47.2%)发生吸入性肺炎。肺炎组和非肺炎组的年龄、口服摄入状况和血清白蛋白水平无显著差异。肺炎组Hyodo吞咽困难总分及各项指标均显著高于非肺炎组。Logistic回归分析显示,唾液潴留(优势比[OR], 1.60;95%置信区间[CI], 1.09-1.33;P= 0.016)和咳嗽反射差(OR, 1.88;95% ci, 1.42-2.49;(p < 0.01)是吸入性肺炎的危险因素。基于总Hyodo吞咽困难评分的肺炎发病的受试者工作特征曲线曲线下面积为0.75 (95% CI, 0.67-0.82)。Hyodo吞咽困难总分的临界值为5,灵敏度为0.75 (95% CI, 0.67-0.83),特异性为0.60 (95% CI, 0.49-0.71),约登指数的最大值为0.35。结论Hyodo吞咽困难总分5分是预测吸入性肺炎发生的最佳临界值。唾液潴留和咳嗽反射差是发生肺炎的危险因素。
{"title":"Validation of the Fiberoptic Endoscopy Evaluation of Swallowing in Aspiration Pneumonia: Utility of the Hyodo Dysphagia Score in Predicting the Development of Aspiration Pneumonia","authors":"Yoko Ibe MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Masayuki Tazawa MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Hironori Arii MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yumiko Nakao MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Risa Toyama MD ,&nbsp;Naoki Wada MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100435","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100435","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To analyze the characteristics of flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) findings in patients with aspiration pneumonia using the Hyodo dysphagia score and to evaluate the risk of aspiration pneumonia.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Retrospective study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Observation in a single primary care institution.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Inpatients aged ≥20 years who underwent FEES in our hospital between April 2012 and March 2022. A total of 178 patients were eligible to calculate the Hyodo dysphagia score and were enrolled in this study. The mean ± SD age of the subjects was 73.4±13.3 years, and 116 of 178 patients (65.2%) were men.</div></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><div>Not applicable.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>The development of aspiration pneumonia.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eighty-four of 178 patients (47.2%) developed aspiration pneumonia. Age, oral intake status, and serum albumin levels were not significantly different between the pneumonia and nonpneumonia groups. The total and each parameter of the Hyodo dysphagia score were significantly higher in the pneumonia group than in the nonpneumonia group. Logistic regression analysis showed that salivary retention (odds ratio [OR], 1.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-1.33; <em>P</em>=.016) and poor cough reflex (OR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.42-2.49; <em>P</em>&lt;.001) in the Hyodo dysphagia score were risk factors for aspiration pneumonia. The area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curve for the onset of pneumonia based on the total Hyodo dysphagia score was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.67-0.82). A cutoff value of 5 for the total Hyodo dysphagia score gave a sensitivity of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.67-0.83) and a specificity of 0.60 (95% CI, 0.49-0.71), with the Youden index having a maximum value of 0.35.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A cutoff value of 5 points for the total Hyodo dysphagia score was optimal in predicting the development of aspiration pneumonia. Salivary retention and poor cough reflex were risk factors for the development of pneumonia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"7 2","pages":"Article 100435"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144222009","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Systematic Review of the Effects of Therapeutic Exercise With Psychological Interventions on Disability and Personal Outcomes in Older Adults 心理干预治疗性运动对老年人残疾和个人预后影响的系统综述
IF 1.9 Q2 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100447
Grace A. Rose , Pietra T. Bruni PhD , Mariana Wingood PT, DPT, PhD, MPH , Selmi Kallmi PhD , Elizabeth Finer MA , Patricia M. Bamonti PhD

Objective

To evaluate the effects of therapeutic exercise and psychological interventions on disability and personal outcomes in older adults.

Data Sources

Articles published from January 2013 to February 2025 are available in PubMed, Embase, ProQuest Health & Medical and Psychology, PsycINFO, and PsycArticles.

Study Selection

Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) intervention included therapeutic exercise combined or integrated with a psychological intervention; (2) randomized controlled trial; (3) sample mean age ≥60 years; (4) primary or secondary outcome(s) of disability. Two authors independently screened trials (n=7391) for inclusion; a third author verified results and resolved discrepancies.

Data Extraction

Data were extracted by a primary reviewer and verified by a second reviewer. The risk of bias assessment was performed using the risk of bias in randomized controlled trials.

Data Synthesis

Thirty-eight trials (n=18,550 participants) were included. Therapeutic exercise included: exercise programs (34%), physical activity counseling and monitoring (37%), rehabilitation (18%), or other (eg, Tai Chi; 13%). Psychological interventions were primarily motivational interviewing (53%) or cognitive-behavioral therapy/strategies (39%). Significant improvement in body functions and structures (n=14, 37%), activity (n=6, 16%), participation (n=20, 53%), and personal factors (n=11, 29%) was observed.

Conclusions

Therapeutic exercise with psychological interventions have a positive effect on disability and personal outcomes, especially in participation. Heterogeneity in the study design, intervention, and population challenged data synthesis. Nonetheless, the current review identified gaps within the literature and directions for future research. Testing the additive effect of these interventions compared to active comparators is a priority for future investigations.
目的评价治疗性运动和心理干预对老年人残疾和个人结局的影响。数据来源2013年1月至2025年2月发表的文章可在PubMed, Embase, ProQuest Health &;医学与心理学,PsycINFO和PsycArticles。研究选择纳入标准如下:(1)干预包括治疗性运动结合或结合心理干预;(2)随机对照试验;(3)样本平均年龄≥60岁;(4)残疾的主要或次要结局。两位作者独立筛选试验(n=7391)纳入;第三位作者验证了结果并解决了差异。数据提取数据由主要审稿人提取,并由第二审稿人验证。偏倚风险评估采用随机对照试验的偏倚风险进行。数据综合纳入38项试验(n=18,550名受试者)。治疗性运动包括:运动计划(34%)、体育活动咨询和监测(37%)、康复(18%)或其他(如太极拳;13%)。心理干预主要是动机性访谈(53%)或认知行为治疗/策略(39%)。观察到身体功能和结构(n=14, 37%)、活动(n=6, 16%)、参与(n=20, 53%)和个人因素(n=11, 29%)的显著改善。结论心理干预治疗性运动对残疾和个人结局有积极影响,尤其是在参与方面。研究设计、干预和人群的异质性对数据合成提出了挑战。尽管如此,目前的综述确定了文献中的空白和未来研究的方向。测试这些干预措施与主动比较物的累加效应是未来研究的重点。
{"title":"A Systematic Review of the Effects of Therapeutic Exercise With Psychological Interventions on Disability and Personal Outcomes in Older Adults","authors":"Grace A. Rose ,&nbsp;Pietra T. Bruni PhD ,&nbsp;Mariana Wingood PT, DPT, PhD, MPH ,&nbsp;Selmi Kallmi PhD ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Finer MA ,&nbsp;Patricia M. Bamonti PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100447","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100447","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the effects of therapeutic exercise and psychological interventions on disability and personal outcomes in older adults.</div></div><div><h3>Data Sources</h3><div>Articles published from January 2013 to February 2025 are available in PubMed, Embase, ProQuest Health &amp; Medical and Psychology, PsycINFO, and PsycArticles.</div></div><div><h3>Study Selection</h3><div>Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) intervention included therapeutic exercise combined or integrated with a psychological intervention; (2) randomized controlled trial; (3) sample mean age ≥60 years; (4) primary or secondary outcome(s) of disability. Two authors independently screened trials (n=7391) for inclusion; a third author verified results and resolved discrepancies.</div></div><div><h3>Data Extraction</h3><div>Data were extracted by a primary reviewer and verified by a second reviewer. The risk of bias assessment was performed using the risk of bias in randomized controlled trials.</div></div><div><h3>Data Synthesis</h3><div>Thirty-eight trials (n=18,550 participants) were included. Therapeutic exercise included: exercise programs (34%), physical activity counseling and monitoring (37%), rehabilitation (18%), or other (eg, Tai Chi; 13%). Psychological interventions were primarily motivational interviewing (53%) or cognitive-behavioral therapy/strategies (39%). Significant improvement in body functions and structures (n=14, 37%), activity (n=6, 16%), participation (n=20, 53%), and personal factors (n=11, 29%) was observed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Therapeutic exercise with psychological interventions have a positive effect on disability and personal outcomes, especially in participation. Heterogeneity in the study design, intervention, and population challenged data synthesis. Nonetheless, the current review identified gaps within the literature and directions for future research. Testing the additive effect of these interventions compared to active comparators is a priority for future investigations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"7 2","pages":"Article 100447"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144222115","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Radiographic Findings in the Lower Extremity Joints of Long-Term Users of Implanted Standing Neuroprostheses with Spinal Cord Injuries 长期使用植入式站立式神经假体伴脊髓损伤患者下肢关节的影像学表现
IF 1.9 Q2 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100448
H. Alex Hoyen BS , Sean Li BS , Michael Miller MS , Sheeba Joseph MD , Patrick Getty MD , Lisa Lombardo MPT , Gilles Pinault MD , Ronald Triolo PhD

Objective

To assess whether lower extremity degenerative joint changes developed in long-term users of implantable neuromuscular prostheses.

Design

Before-after radiographic assessment.

Setting

Tertiary care center.

Participants

Four individuals (4 men, average age 46.5y, injuries ranging from C7-T11) with spinal cord injury resulting in lower extremity paraplegia were included for analysis. All individuals previously received surgery for the placement of a neuroprosthesis implant system. Individuals were followed with specific spinal cord injury outcome measures and radiographs in a prospective manner. Individual implant usage was also recorded as part of the standard treatment. These individuals were selected because they were in the highest tier for daily use of the implant system.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Development of degenerative joint pathology, based on analysis of pre- and post-therapy radiographs and grading using the Kellgren and Lawrence and Van Dijk scales.

Results

None of the joints for the individuals that were graded 0-2 (no or mild arthritis) progressed to a grade 3 (moderate arthritis). Further, none of the joints developed an arthritic grade of >3. Only 2 of the 24 total joints had statistically significant (P<.05) degenerative changes: subject 1: right hip; P=.033 (average grade increased from 0.875-1.875); subject 2: right hip; P=.049 (average grade increased from 0.875-1.50).

Conclusions

At an average of 5 years after implantation, regular and independent weight bearing in 4 higher-than-average users of a neuromuscular prosthesis does not appear to promote lower extremity joint degeneration.
目的评估长期使用植入式神经肌肉假体是否会发生下肢退行性关节改变。设计前后放射评估。三级护理中心。4名患者(4名男性,平均年龄46.5岁,损伤范围从C7-T11)因脊髓损伤导致下肢截瘫被纳入分析。所有患者之前都接受了神经假体植入系统的手术。对个体进行前瞻性的脊髓损伤结局测量和x线片随访。个体种植体的使用也被记录为标准治疗的一部分。这些人被选中是因为他们在日常使用植入系统的最高层次。InterventionsNot适用。主要观察指标:基于治疗前和治疗后x线片的分析以及Kellgren、Lawrence和Van Dijk量表的分级,关节退行性病理的发展。结果0-2级(无或轻度关节炎)患者的关节无一进展为3级(中度关节炎)。此外,没有一个关节发展成关节炎等级为3。24个关节中只有2个有统计学意义(P< 0.05)退行性改变:受试者1:右髋关节;P = .033(平均成绩0.875-1.875);受试者2:右臀部;P = .049(平均成绩从0.875-1.50增加)。结论4例高于平均水平的神经肌肉假体使用者在植入后平均5年的时间里,正常独立负重并没有出现促进下肢关节退行性变的情况。
{"title":"Radiographic Findings in the Lower Extremity Joints of Long-Term Users of Implanted Standing Neuroprostheses with Spinal Cord Injuries","authors":"H. Alex Hoyen BS ,&nbsp;Sean Li BS ,&nbsp;Michael Miller MS ,&nbsp;Sheeba Joseph MD ,&nbsp;Patrick Getty MD ,&nbsp;Lisa Lombardo MPT ,&nbsp;Gilles Pinault MD ,&nbsp;Ronald Triolo PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100448","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100448","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess whether lower extremity degenerative joint changes developed in long-term users of implantable neuromuscular prostheses.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Before-after radiographic assessment.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Tertiary care center.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Four individuals (4 men, average age 46.5y, injuries ranging from C7-T11) with spinal cord injury resulting in lower extremity paraplegia were included for analysis. All individuals previously received surgery for the placement of a neuroprosthesis implant system. Individuals were followed with specific spinal cord injury outcome measures and radiographs in a prospective manner. Individual implant usage was also recorded as part of the standard treatment. These individuals were selected because they were in the highest tier for daily use of the implant system.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Not applicable.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Development of degenerative joint pathology, based on analysis of pre- and post-therapy radiographs and grading using the Kellgren and Lawrence and Van Dijk scales.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>None of the joints for the individuals that were graded 0-2 (no or mild arthritis) progressed to a grade 3 (moderate arthritis). Further, none of the joints developed an arthritic grade of &gt;3. Only 2 of the 24 total joints had statistically significant (<em>P</em>&lt;.05) degenerative changes: subject 1: right hip; <em>P</em>=.033 (average grade increased from 0.875-1.875); subject 2: right hip; <em>P</em>=.049 (average grade increased from 0.875-1.50).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>At an average of 5 years after implantation, regular and independent weight bearing in 4 higher-than-average users of a neuromuscular prosthesis does not appear to promote lower extremity joint degeneration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"7 2","pages":"Article 100448"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144222007","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Phantom Limb Pain Assessment Tools: A Literature Review Exploring Strengths and Limitations 幻肢疼痛评估工具:探讨优势和局限性的文献综述
IF 1.9 Q2 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-04 DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100453
Alexandra N. Jenson BS , Benjamin Branch DO , Janelle M. Richard BA , Aurora Quaye MD

Objective

To identify and categorize the pain instruments used to evaluate phantom limb pain (PLP), phantom limb sensations (PLSs), and residual limb pain (RLP) stratified by frequency of use, instrument completion time, and inclusion of descriptive terms to distinguish between the 3 phenomena.

Data Sources

MEDLINE/PubMed and Google Scholar from 1986 to 2024.

Study Selection

Cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies investigating the prevalence of PLP in adults (18y or older) with surgical and traumatic upper or lower limb amputation.

Data Extraction

Studies were identified and their methods were evaluated for mention of instruments used to assess for PLP. Tools were then evaluated for frequency of usage, completion time, differentiation of pain and sensations after limb amputation, and qualitative assessment using descriptor words associated with PLP and PLSs.

Data Synthesis

The review included 44 studies and identified 25 tools (5 unidimensional and 20 multidimensional). Unidimensional pain scales, particularly the Numeric Rating Scale, were the most frequently used. Of the multidimensional instruments identified, 9 of them were specific to PLP, and 6 distinguished between PLP, PLS, and RLP. Only one multidimensional instrument that was specific to PLP used descriptor words to differentiate between PLP and PLS. No tool was assessed for all 3 conditions and used descriptor words to distinguish between PLP and PLSs.

Conclusions

Based on this systematic review, no PLP-specific instrument is suitable for standardizing the diagnosis of PLP in its current form. Further research is needed to establish a standardized tool that can reliably distinguish between PLP, PLS, and RLP while incorporating qualitative assessments to ensure accurate diagnosis.
目的根据使用频率、器械完成时间和描述术语的包含情况,对用于评估幻肢痛(PLP)、幻肢感觉(pls)和残肢痛(RLP)的疼痛器械进行分类和鉴定,以区分这三种现象。数据来源medline /PubMed和谷歌Scholar 1986 - 2024年。研究选择:横断面、队列和病例对照研究调查手术和创伤性上肢或下肢截肢的成人(18岁或以上)PLP的患病率。数据提取:对研究进行鉴定,并对其方法进行评估,以提及用于评估PLP的工具。然后评估工具的使用频率、完成时间、截肢后疼痛和感觉的区分,并使用与PLP和PLSs相关的描述词进行定性评估。本综述包括44项研究,确定了25种工具(5种一维工具和20种多维工具)。单维疼痛量表,尤其是数字评定量表,是最常用的。在确定的多维工具中,有9个是针对PLP的,6个区分PLP、PLS和RLP。只有一个特定于PLP的多维工具使用描述词来区分PLP和PLS。没有工具对所有3种情况进行评估,并使用描述词来区分PLP和PLS。结论基于本系统综述,目前形式的PLP没有适合于标准化诊断的PLP特异性仪器。需要进一步的研究来建立一个标准化的工具,可以可靠地区分PLP, PLS和RLP,同时结合定性评估以确保准确诊断。
{"title":"Phantom Limb Pain Assessment Tools: A Literature Review Exploring Strengths and Limitations","authors":"Alexandra N. Jenson BS ,&nbsp;Benjamin Branch DO ,&nbsp;Janelle M. Richard BA ,&nbsp;Aurora Quaye MD","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100453","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100453","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To identify and categorize the pain instruments used to evaluate phantom limb pain (PLP), phantom limb sensations (PLSs), and residual limb pain (RLP) stratified by frequency of use, instrument completion time, and inclusion of descriptive terms to distinguish between the 3 phenomena.</div></div><div><h3>Data Sources</h3><div>MEDLINE/PubMed and Google Scholar from 1986 to 2024.</div></div><div><h3>Study Selection</h3><div>Cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies investigating the prevalence of PLP in adults (18y or older) with surgical and traumatic upper or lower limb amputation.</div></div><div><h3>Data Extraction</h3><div>Studies were identified and their methods were evaluated for mention of instruments used to assess for PLP. Tools were then evaluated for frequency of usage, completion time, differentiation of pain and sensations after limb amputation, and qualitative assessment using descriptor words associated with PLP and PLSs.</div></div><div><h3>Data Synthesis</h3><div>The review included 44 studies and identified 25 tools (5 unidimensional and 20 multidimensional). Unidimensional pain scales, particularly the Numeric Rating Scale, were the most frequently used. Of the multidimensional instruments identified, 9 of them were specific to PLP, and 6 distinguished between PLP, PLS, and RLP. Only one multidimensional instrument that was specific to PLP used descriptor words to differentiate between PLP and PLS. No tool was assessed for all 3 conditions and used descriptor words to distinguish between PLP and PLSs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Based on this systematic review, no PLP-specific instrument is suitable for standardizing the diagnosis of PLP in its current form. Further research is needed to establish a standardized tool that can reliably distinguish between PLP, PLS, and RLP while incorporating qualitative assessments to ensure accurate diagnosis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"7 2","pages":"Article 100453"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144222045","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Causes of Adolescent Low Back Pain: A Retrospective Study 青少年腰痛的原因:一项回顾性研究
IF 1.9 Q2 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100433
Imana Rhoden MD, Jeremy Simon MD, Adam T. Chrusch MD, David Stolzenberg DO, Christopher Mehallo DO, Grant Thomas BS

Objective

To add to the body of evidence in the scientific literature with respect to the etiology of adolescent back pain.

Design

A retrospective chart review was conducted over a 3 year period. Charts were initially rendered using International Classification of Disease, 10th Revision (ICD-10) diagnosis, and subsequently narrowed down to age range of 10-19 years. Additionally, patients with documented trauma requiring emergent spinal surgery or an alternative diagnosis (eg, hip pain) were excluded.

Setting

This study was performed in a large United States based private multispecialty orthopedic practice. This includes 30 different ambulatory office locations in multiple demographic regions.

Participants

Patients ages 10 to 19 years old who presented with documented low back pain (LBP) were included. A total of N = 1932 patients were included with a 1.1/1 women to men ratio. The study was conducted over a 3 year period (2015-2018).

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Final diagnosis reached by clinician, verified by chart and imaging review.

Results

A total of 1932 patients were included: 1010 (52.3%) women and 922 (47.7%) men. Physician reviewers grouped the diagnoses into comprehensive categories. LBP without a specific cause was the most common diagnosis with 827 patients (42.81%). Women accounted for 447 (54.0%) of the patients diagnosed with LBP, whereas men accounted for 380 (46.0%). Disk disease was the second most common diagnosis representing 534 study participants (27.64%). There were more women than men in the overall disk cohort with 304 (30.10%) and 230 (24.95%), respectively. Spondylolysis was the third most common diagnosis with 281 patients (14.54%). The prevalence was higher for men than women, 192 (20.82%) and 89 (8.81%), respectively.

Conclusions

A clearer understanding of the various etiologies associated with general LBP was obtained. The findings reveal a higher occurrence of disk-related issues compared with previous data and highlight gender-based differences in the identified pathologies.
目的补充科学文献中有关青少年背痛病因的证据。DesignA回顾性图表审查进行了超过3年的时间。图表最初使用国际疾病分类第十次修订版(ICD-10)诊断,随后缩小到10-19岁的年龄范围。此外,有创伤需要紧急脊柱手术或其他诊断(如髋关节疼痛)的患者被排除在外。本研究是在美国一家大型私人多专业骨科诊所进行的。这包括在多个人口区域的30个不同的流动办公室地点。参与者包括年龄在10至19岁之间且有腰痛(LBP)记录的患者。共纳入N = 1932例患者,男女比例为1.1/1。该研究历时3年(2015-2018)。InterventionsNot适用。主要观察指标临床医生作出最终诊断,经图表和影像学检查证实。结果共纳入患者1932例,其中女性1010例(52.3%),男性922例(47.7%)。医师审稿人将诊断分为综合类别。无特殊原因的腰痛是最常见的诊断,共有827例(42.81%)。在诊断为LBP的患者中,女性占447例(54.0%),而男性占380例(46.0%)。椎间盘疾病是第二常见的诊断,共有534名研究参与者(27.64%)。在整个磁盘队列中,女性多于男性,分别为304例(30.10%)和230例(24.95%)。峡部裂是第三常见的诊断,共有281例(14.54%)。男性患病率高于女性,分别为192例(20.82%)和89例(8.81%)。结论对全身性腰痛的病因有了更清晰的认识。研究结果显示,与以前的数据相比,椎间盘相关问题的发生率更高,并强调了已确定病理的性别差异。
{"title":"Causes of Adolescent Low Back Pain: A Retrospective Study","authors":"Imana Rhoden MD,&nbsp;Jeremy Simon MD,&nbsp;Adam T. Chrusch MD,&nbsp;David Stolzenberg DO,&nbsp;Christopher Mehallo DO,&nbsp;Grant Thomas BS","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100433","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100433","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To add to the body of evidence in the scientific literature with respect to the etiology of adolescent back pain.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A retrospective chart review was conducted over a 3 year period. Charts were initially rendered using International Classification of Disease, 10th Revision (ICD-10) diagnosis, and subsequently narrowed down to age range of 10-19 years. Additionally, patients with documented trauma requiring emergent spinal surgery or an alternative diagnosis (eg, hip pain) were excluded.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>This study was performed in a large United States based private multispecialty orthopedic practice. This includes 30 different ambulatory office locations in multiple demographic regions.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Patients ages 10 to 19 years old who presented with documented low back pain (LBP) were included. A total of N = 1932 patients were included with a 1.1/1 women to men ratio. The study was conducted over a 3 year period (2015-2018).</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Not applicable.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Final diagnosis reached by clinician, verified by chart and imaging review.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 1932 patients were included: 1010 (52.3%) women and 922 (47.7%) men. Physician reviewers grouped the diagnoses into comprehensive categories. LBP without a specific cause was the most common diagnosis with 827 patients (42.81%). Women accounted for 447 (54.0%) of the patients diagnosed with LBP, whereas men accounted for 380 (46.0%). Disk disease was the second most common diagnosis representing 534 study participants (27.64%). There were more women than men in the overall disk cohort with 304 (30.10%) and 230 (24.95%), respectively. Spondylolysis was the third most common diagnosis with 281 patients (14.54%). The prevalence was higher for men than women, 192 (20.82%) and 89 (8.81%), respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A clearer understanding of the various etiologies associated with general LBP was obtained. The findings reveal a higher occurrence of disk-related issues compared with previous data and highlight gender-based differences in the identified pathologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"7 2","pages":"Article 100433"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144222006","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reliability of the Five Step Assessment and Its Coefficients of Impairment in Spastic Paresis 痉挛性轻瘫损伤五步评估及其系数的信度
IF 1.9 Q2 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100444
Marjolaine Baude MD , Maud Pradines PT, PhD , Caroline Gault-Colas MD , Damien Motavasseli MD , David Simpson MD , Tymothée Poitou MD , Violaine Piquet MD , Pierre-André Natella MD , Jean-Michel Gracies MD, PhD

Objective

To determine the intrarater and interrater reliability of the Five Step Assessment (FSA) and its derived coefficients of impairment in chronic spastic paresis.

Design

Prospective observational study.

Setting

Study of outpatients followed in a rehabilitation department.

Participants

In this single-center prospective study, participants (n=18) with chronic hemiparesis (>1y since injury) were evaluated by 4 raters (3 medical doctors, 1 physiotherapist; experience in hemiparesis, 14±9y).

Interventions

All raters estimated muscle shortening, spasticity, weakness, and fatigability against the resistance of 8 key antagonists in adults twice, one week apart.

Main Outcome Measures

FSA involves measuring 4 angles: angle of arrest at slow speed of stretch (XV1), angle of catch or clonus at fast speed of stretch (XV3, Tardieu), angle of match between maximal agonist effort and passive and active antagonist resistances (XA), residual angle of match after 15 seconds of repeated maximal amplitude active efforts (XA15), and spasticity grade Y. Four derived coefficients of impairment were studied: coefficients of shortening, CSH=(XN−XV1)/XN (XN, normally expected maximal passive joint amplitude); of spasticity, CSP=(XV1−XV3)/XV1; of weakness, CW=(XV1−XA)/XV1; and of fatigability, CF=(XA−XA15)/XA. Both intraclass correlation coefficients and mean differences were calculated for each parameter.

Results

Among 18 participants (four women), intrarater reliability was good to excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.75) for all parameters in all muscles. Interrater reliability was good to excellent for all muscles and parameters except for spasticity grade Y and coefficient of fatigability (moderate).

Conclusions

The 5 parameters and 4 coefficients of impairment of the FSA have moderate-to-excellent intrarater and interrater reliability in chronic spastic paresis.
目的探讨慢性痉挛性轻瘫患者五步评估(FSA)及其衍生系数的内、外信度。前瞻性观察性研究。研究对象为某康复科门诊患者。在这项单中心前瞻性研究中,慢性偏瘫(损伤后1年)的参与者(n=18)由4名评分者(3名医生,1名物理治疗师;偏瘫经验,14±9y)。干预措施:所有评分者对8种主要拮抗剂对成人的肌肉缩短、痉挛、无力和疲劳进行两次评估,间隔一周。主要观察指标fsa包括测量4个角度:慢速拉伸时的阻滞角(XV1)、快速拉伸时的捕获或闭合角(XV3, Tardieu)、最大激动剂努力与被动和主动拮抗剂抗性之间的匹配角(XA)、重复最大振幅主动努力15秒后的剩余匹配角(XA15)和痉挛等级y。缩短系数,CSH=(XN−XV1)/XN (XN,通常期望最大被动关节振幅);痉挛,CSP=(XV1−XV3)/XV1;弱点,CW=(XV1−XA)/XV1;疲劳系数CF=(XA−XA15)/XA。计算各参数的类内相关系数和平均差值。结果18名参与者(4名女性)中,所有肌肉的所有参数的组内信度均为良好至优秀(组内相关系数>;0.75)。除痉挛等级Y和疲劳系数(中等)外,所有肌肉和参数的判读信度均为良好至优异。结论慢性痉挛性轻瘫患者FSA损伤的5个参数和4个系数具有中等至优异的内部和内部信度。
{"title":"Reliability of the Five Step Assessment and Its Coefficients of Impairment in Spastic Paresis","authors":"Marjolaine Baude MD ,&nbsp;Maud Pradines PT, PhD ,&nbsp;Caroline Gault-Colas MD ,&nbsp;Damien Motavasseli MD ,&nbsp;David Simpson MD ,&nbsp;Tymothée Poitou MD ,&nbsp;Violaine Piquet MD ,&nbsp;Pierre-André Natella MD ,&nbsp;Jean-Michel Gracies MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100444","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100444","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To determine the intrarater and interrater reliability of the Five Step Assessment (FSA) and its derived coefficients of impairment in chronic spastic paresis.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Prospective observational study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Study of outpatients followed in a rehabilitation department.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>In this single-center prospective study, participants (n=18) with chronic hemiparesis (&gt;1y since injury) were evaluated by 4 raters (3 medical doctors, 1 physiotherapist; experience in hemiparesis, 14±9y).</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>All raters estimated muscle shortening, spasticity, weakness, and fatigability against the resistance of 8 key antagonists in adults twice, one week apart.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>FSA involves measuring 4 angles: angle of arrest at slow speed of stretch (X<sub>V1</sub>), angle of catch or clonus at fast speed of stretch (X<sub>V3</sub>, Tardieu), angle of match between maximal agonist effort and passive and active antagonist resistances (X<sub>A</sub>), residual angle of match after 15 seconds of repeated maximal amplitude active efforts (X<sub>A15</sub>), and spasticity grade Y. Four derived coefficients of impairment were studied: coefficients of shortening, C<sub>SH=</sub>(X<sub>N</sub>−X<sub>V1</sub>)/X<sub>N</sub> (X<sub>N</sub>, normally expected maximal passive joint amplitude); of spasticity, C<sub>SP</sub>=(X<sub>V1</sub>−X<sub>V3</sub>)/X<sub>V1</sub>; of weakness, C<sub>W</sub>=(X<sub>V1</sub>−X<sub>A</sub>)/X<sub>V1</sub>; and of fatigability, C<sub>F</sub>=(X<sub>A</sub>−X<sub>A15</sub>)/X<sub>A</sub>. Both intraclass correlation coefficients and mean differences were calculated for each parameter.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 18 participants (four women), intrarater reliability was good to excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient &gt;0.75) for all parameters in all muscles. Interrater reliability was good to excellent for all muscles and parameters except for spasticity grade Y and coefficient of fatigability (moderate).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The 5 parameters and 4 coefficients of impairment of the FSA have moderate-to-excellent intrarater and interrater reliability in chronic spastic paresis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"7 2","pages":"Article 100444"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144222008","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Quantifying At-Home Physiotherapy Participation: SPARS vs Self-Reported Diaries 量化家庭物理治疗参与:SPARS与自我报告日记
IF 1.9 Q2 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100445
Matthew Rezkalla BSc , Philip Boyer PhD , David Burns MD, PhD , Cristian Renteria PT, MPIA , Cari Whyne PhD
The completion of at-home physiotherapy exercise is key to many rehabilitation protocols. This study compares at-home upper extremity physiotherapy participation as measured based on data captured with a smart watch to that recorded in self-report diaries. Daily at-home exercise participation (sessions) was recorded for 53 patients with rotator cuff pathology during their first 2 weeks of a 12-week physiotherapy rehabilitation program. Exercise participation was measured using a physical therapy monitoring system that uses smart watch (accelerometer/gyroscope) data analyzed via a convolutional neural network trained on labeled patient-specific in-clinic data and compared to patient reported diaries. A high level of agreement between diary exercise participation and the measurements derived from the smart watch data (ICC=0.72, n=53) was found, with an AUROC=0.99 for binary identification of exercise periods on labeled clinic data. However, overall patient diaries reported more exercise performed (0.96 additional days on average) than measured by the ML algorithm. ML and accelerometer/gyroscope data collected by embedded sensors in a smartwatch represents an accurate and objective alternative to self-reported diaries for monitoring patient at-home participation. Lower levels recorded by the ML algorithm may indicate some limitations in the technology to fully capture participation or potential over-reporting of participation within diaries. As self-reported diary completion decreases over time, physical therapy monitoring technology may represent an acceptable method for longer term assessment of exercise participation.
完成家庭物理治疗运动是许多康复方案的关键。这项研究比较了家庭上肢物理治疗的参与情况,这是基于智能手表捕获的数据和记录在自我报告日记中的数据。在为期12周的物理治疗康复计划的前2周,记录了53名患有肩袖病变的患者每天在家锻炼的情况。通过物理治疗监测系统测量运动参与情况,该系统使用智能手表(加速度计/陀螺仪)数据,通过卷积神经网络对标记的患者特异性临床数据进行训练,并与患者报告的日记进行比较。日记运动参与与智能手表数据得出的测量结果高度一致(ICC=0.72, n=53),标记临床数据的运动周期二元识别AUROC=0.99。然而,与ML算法相比,总体患者日记报告了更多的锻炼(平均额外0.96天)。智能手表中的嵌入式传感器收集的ML和加速度计/陀螺仪数据代表了一种准确和客观的替代自我报告的日记,用于监测患者在家的参与情况。ML算法记录的较低水平可能表明该技术在完全捕获参与或潜在的日记中过度报告参与方面存在一些局限性。由于自我报告的日记完成程度随着时间的推移而下降,物理治疗监测技术可能是一种可接受的长期评估运动参与的方法。
{"title":"Quantifying At-Home Physiotherapy Participation: SPARS vs Self-Reported Diaries","authors":"Matthew Rezkalla BSc ,&nbsp;Philip Boyer PhD ,&nbsp;David Burns MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Cristian Renteria PT, MPIA ,&nbsp;Cari Whyne PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100445","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100445","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The completion of at-home physiotherapy exercise is key to many rehabilitation protocols. This study compares at-home upper extremity physiotherapy participation as measured based on data captured with a smart watch to that recorded in self-report diaries. Daily at-home exercise participation (sessions) was recorded for 53 patients with rotator cuff pathology during their first 2 weeks of a 12-week physiotherapy rehabilitation program. Exercise participation was measured using a physical therapy monitoring system that uses smart watch (accelerometer/gyroscope) data analyzed via a convolutional neural network trained on labeled patient-specific in-clinic data and compared to patient reported diaries. A high level of agreement between diary exercise participation and the measurements derived from the smart watch data (ICC=0.72, n=53) was found, with an AUROC=0.99 for binary identification of exercise periods on labeled clinic data. However, overall patient diaries reported more exercise performed (0.96 additional days on average) than measured by the ML algorithm. ML and accelerometer/gyroscope data collected by embedded sensors in a smartwatch represents an accurate and objective alternative to self-reported diaries for monitoring patient at-home participation. Lower levels recorded by the ML algorithm may indicate some limitations in the technology to fully capture participation or potential over-reporting of participation within diaries. As self-reported diary completion decreases over time, physical therapy monitoring technology may represent an acceptable method for longer term assessment of exercise participation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"7 2","pages":"Article 100445"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144222047","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reproductive Education and Sexual Abuse Among Individuals With Spina Bifida: A Mixed Methods Study 脊柱裂患者的生殖教育和性虐待:一项混合方法研究
IF 1.9 Q2 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100455
Betsy Hopson PhD, MSHA , Molly Richardson PhD, MPH , Caroline Caudill BS , Don Lein PhD , Courtney Streur MD , Elizabeth Taylor PhD , Suzannah Rogers MD , Victoria Jiminez BS , Brandon G. Rocque MD, MS , Jeffrey Blount MD, MPH , David Joseph MD , Ching Man Carmen Tong MD

Objective

To investigate sexual and reproductive health (SRH) knowledge and practices among young adults with spina bifida (SB), with an emphasis on identifying gaps in SRH literacy and barriers to care.

Design

Sequential explanatory mixed methods study consisting of a disability-specific survey and follow-up interviews.

Setting

Participants were recruited from a multidisciplinary SB clinic.

Participants

Eighty young adults (N=80) with SB were surveyed (March 2021-April 2022), and 4 participants from this sample took part in follow-up in-depth qualitative interviews. The sample included both male and female participants who were sexually active or had prior exposure to SRH education.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Primary measures assessed SRH knowledge gaps, relationship barriers, contraception use, pregnancy awareness, and experiences of abuse/coercion. Findings aim to inform educational programs, abuse prevention, and clinical guidelines for individuals with SB.

Results

Among the 80 survey participants, 55% of men and 47% of women reported being sexually active. Despite this, 44% of women were unsure about their ability to become pregnant. Sexual abuse or coercion was reported by 25% of women and 10% of men. Key interview themes included challenges and supports related to dating, gaps in SRH education, experiences with sexual intimacy, and the prevalence of sexual abuse. Barriers stemmed from concerns about disclosing SB, misconceptions about independent living, and restricted social opportunities because of family protectiveness. Facilitators included online dating, shared interests, and acceptance from open-minded partners.

Conclusions

Among the young adults with SB who participated in this study, many were sexually active but faced significant barriers and gaps in SRH knowledge, increasing their risk of sexual abuse and poor reproductive health outcomes. Determining levels of sexual health literacy and screening for abuse are critical to improving SRH outcomes for this vulnerable population.
目的调查青年脊柱裂(SB)患者的性健康和生殖健康(SRH)知识和实践,重点确定性健康和生殖健康素养的差距和护理障碍。设计:顺序解释混合方法研究,包括残疾专项调查和随访访谈。参与者从多学科SB诊所招募。在2021年3月至2022年4月期间,对80名患有SB的年轻人(N=80)进行了调查,其中4名参与者参加了后续的深度定性访谈。样本包括性活跃或曾接受过性健康与生殖健康教育的男性和女性参与者。InterventionsNot适用。主要结局指标主要指标评估了性健康和生殖健康知识差距、关系障碍、避孕措施的使用、怀孕意识和虐待/胁迫经历。结果80名调查参与者中,55%的男性和47%的女性报告性活跃。尽管如此,仍有44%的女性不确定自己是否有能力怀孕。25%的女性和10%的男性报告了性侵犯或胁迫。访谈的主要主题包括与约会有关的挑战和支持,性健康和生殖健康教育的差距,性亲密的经历,以及性虐待的普遍性。障碍源于对披露SB的担忧,对独立生活的误解,以及由于家庭保护而限制的社会机会。促进因素包括在线约会、共同的兴趣爱好以及来自思想开放的伴侣的接受。结论参与本研究的年轻SB患者中,许多人性活跃,但在性健康和生殖健康知识方面存在明显的障碍和差距,这增加了他们遭受性虐待的风险和不良的生殖健康结果。确定性健康知识普及水平和筛查虐待行为对于改善这一弱势群体的性健康和生殖健康结果至关重要。
{"title":"Reproductive Education and Sexual Abuse Among Individuals With Spina Bifida: A Mixed Methods Study","authors":"Betsy Hopson PhD, MSHA ,&nbsp;Molly Richardson PhD, MPH ,&nbsp;Caroline Caudill BS ,&nbsp;Don Lein PhD ,&nbsp;Courtney Streur MD ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Taylor PhD ,&nbsp;Suzannah Rogers MD ,&nbsp;Victoria Jiminez BS ,&nbsp;Brandon G. Rocque MD, MS ,&nbsp;Jeffrey Blount MD, MPH ,&nbsp;David Joseph MD ,&nbsp;Ching Man Carmen Tong MD","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100455","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100455","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate sexual and reproductive health (SRH) knowledge and practices among young adults with spina bifida (SB), with an emphasis on identifying gaps in SRH literacy and barriers to care.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Sequential explanatory mixed methods study consisting of a disability-specific survey and follow-up interviews.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Participants were recruited from a multidisciplinary SB clinic.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Eighty young adults (N=80) with SB were surveyed (March 2021-April 2022), and 4 participants from this sample took part in follow-up in-depth qualitative interviews. The sample included both male and female participants who were sexually active or had prior exposure to SRH education.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Not applicable.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Primary measures assessed SRH knowledge gaps, relationship barriers, contraception use, pregnancy awareness, and experiences of abuse/coercion. Findings aim to inform educational programs, abuse prevention, and clinical guidelines for individuals with SB.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 80 survey participants, 55% of men and 47% of women reported being sexually active. Despite this, 44% of women were unsure about their ability to become pregnant. Sexual abuse or coercion was reported by 25% of women and 10% of men. Key interview themes included challenges and supports related to dating, gaps in SRH education, experiences with sexual intimacy, and the prevalence of sexual abuse. Barriers stemmed from concerns about disclosing SB, misconceptions about independent living, and restricted social opportunities because of family protectiveness. Facilitators included online dating, shared interests, and acceptance from open-minded partners.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Among the young adults with SB who participated in this study, many were sexually active but faced significant barriers and gaps in SRH knowledge, increasing their risk of sexual abuse and poor reproductive health outcomes. Determining levels of sexual health literacy and screening for abuse are critical to improving SRH outcomes for this vulnerable population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"7 2","pages":"Article 100455"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144222109","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Item-Level Psychometrics for the Functional Gait Assessment in Persons With Stroke 脑卒中患者功能性步态评估的项目水平心理测量学
IF 1.9 Q2 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100452
Bryant A. Seamon PT, DPT, PhD , Steven A. Kautz PhD , Mark G. Bowden PT, PhD , Jesse C. Dean PhD , Chris M. Gregory PT, PhD , Richard R. Neptune PhD , Craig A. Velozo PhD, OTR/L

Objective

To determine the item-level psychometrics of the Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) for persons with chronic stroke and create a keyform (or score sheet) for clinicians.

Design

Retrospective cohort.

Setting

Archival item-level data from a research database.

Participants

One-hundred-one ambulatory persons (N=101) with chronic stroke (44% women, 58% right hemiparesis, average age 59y, lower extremity Fugl-Meyer 25, and overground self-selected walking speed 0.76 m/s).

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

A principal component analysis of the residuals from the Andrich Rating Scale Model (RSM) was used to evaluate unidimensionality and item local dependence. The RSM was also used to examine the rating scale structure, item and person fit, item difficulty hierarchy, and person separation index and to generate a keyform.

Results

Principal component analysis of the residuals confirmed the FGA’s unidimensionality and that no items had local dependence. The category rating scale met the criterion and advanced monotonically. The item difficulty hierarchy was similar to that of community-dwelling older adults. The sample’s mean ability level (ie, person measure) was 0.28 logits (SE=0.63). The FGA had high person reliability (0.90) despite 10% of persons misfitting. There were no floor or ceiling effects, and the FGA separated people into 4 strata. The scored FGA keyform visually showed an individual’s response pattern relative to their measure value.

Conclusion

Rasch analysis supports the use of the FGA to measure walking balance ability in ambulatory persons with chronic stroke. An FGA keyform can provide instantaneous interval measurement for individuals.
目的确定慢性中风患者功能步态评估(FGA)的项目水平心理测量学,并为临床医生创建一个关键表格(或计分表)。DesignRetrospective队列。设置来自研究数据库的存档项目级数据。研究对象101例慢性脑卒中患者(女性44%,右半瘫58%,平均年龄59岁,下肢Fugl-Meyer 25岁,地上步行速度0.76 m/s)。InterventionsNot适用。主要结果测量采用Andrich评定量表模型(RSM)残差的主成分分析来评估单维性和项目局部依赖性。RSM还用于评估量表结构、项目与人契合度、项目难度等级和人分离指数,并生成关键字表。结果残差的主成分分析证实了FGA的单维性,没有项目具有局部依赖性。类别评定量表满足标准,单调进阶。项目难度等级与社区居住老年人相似。样本的平均能力水平(即个人测量)为0.28 logits (SE=0.63)。尽管有10%的人不符合,但FGA具有较高的人信度(0.90)。没有下限或上限效应,FGA将人们分为4个阶层。得分的FGA键形直观地显示了个体相对于测量值的反应模式。结论rasch分析支持使用FGA测量慢性脑卒中患者的行走平衡能力。FGA键形可以为个人提供瞬时间隔测量。
{"title":"Item-Level Psychometrics for the Functional Gait Assessment in Persons With Stroke","authors":"Bryant A. Seamon PT, DPT, PhD ,&nbsp;Steven A. Kautz PhD ,&nbsp;Mark G. Bowden PT, PhD ,&nbsp;Jesse C. Dean PhD ,&nbsp;Chris M. Gregory PT, PhD ,&nbsp;Richard R. Neptune PhD ,&nbsp;Craig A. Velozo PhD, OTR/L","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100452","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100452","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To determine the item-level psychometrics of the Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) for persons with chronic stroke and create a keyform (or score sheet) for clinicians.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Retrospective cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Archival item-level data from a research database.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>One-hundred-one ambulatory persons (N=101) with chronic stroke (44% women, 58% right hemiparesis, average age 59y, lower extremity Fugl-Meyer 25, and overground self-selected walking speed 0.76 m/s).</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Not applicable.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>A principal component analysis of the residuals from the Andrich Rating Scale Model (RSM) was used to evaluate unidimensionality and item local dependence. The RSM was also used to examine the rating scale structure, item and person fit, item difficulty hierarchy, and person separation index and to generate a keyform.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Principal component analysis of the residuals confirmed the FGA’s unidimensionality and that no items had local dependence. The category rating scale met the criterion and advanced monotonically. The item difficulty hierarchy was similar to that of community-dwelling older adults. The sample’s mean ability level (ie, person measure) was 0.28 logits (SE=0.63). The FGA had high person reliability (0.90) despite 10% of persons misfitting. There were no floor or ceiling effects, and the FGA separated people into 4 strata. The scored FGA keyform visually showed an individual’s response pattern relative to their measure value.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Rasch analysis supports the use of the FGA to measure walking balance ability in ambulatory persons with chronic stroke. An FGA keyform can provide instantaneous interval measurement for individuals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"7 2","pages":"Article 100452"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144222110","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1