Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation最新文献

Objective

To evaluate how the distribution of patients in groups (based on subjective health experience) changes over time and to investigate differences in physical functioning and mental health between these patient groups.

Design

An observational cohort study.

Setting

University medical center.

Participants

Patients who underwent gastrointestinal or bladder oncological surgery (N=98).

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

The classification of patients into different groups based on the subjective health experience model (acceptance and perceived control), preoperatively and 1 and 3 months after discharge.

Results

In total, 98 patients were included. Preoperatively, 31% of the patients were classified as having low acceptance and perceived control (group 4), and this proportion increased to 47% and 45% 1 and 3 months after discharge, respectively. These patients had significantly lower levels of physical functioning (preoperatively, 55 vs 61; P=.030; 1 month, 47 vs 57; P=.002; 3 months, 52 vs 62; P=.006) and higher levels of anxiety and depression (preoperatively, 14 vs 9; P<.001; 1 month, 11 vs 3; P=.001; 3 months, 10 vs 3; P=.009) than patients with high acceptance and perceived control (group 1).

Conclusions

The classification of patients to different groups provides insight in different levels of physical and mental health. However, frequent evaluation is important because of changes in patient groups over time.

The present study aims to describe the chair, bed, and toilet heights in rehabilitation hospitals and home environments to challenge rehabilitation clinicians to better prepare stroke survivors for discharge home. This study uses analysis of secondary outcomes from a multicentre, phase II randomized controlled trial (HOME Rehab trial) and additional observation of hospital environment. Data were collected from six rehabilitation hospitals and the homes of two hundred first-time stroke survivors who were aged >45 years. Chair, bed and toilet heights were measured; we measured 936 chairs and beds in hospital (17%) and home (83%) environments. Mean chair height at home was 47 cm (SD 6), which was 2 cm (95% CI, 0-4) lower than in the hospital ward and 5 cm (95% CI, 3-7) lower than in the hospital gym. Mean toilet height at home was 42 cm (SD 3), which was 3 cm (95% CI, 2-4) lower than in the hospital. Study findings suggest a disparity in heights between hospitals and home. Although clinicians may be aware of this disparity, they need to ensure that chair and bed heights within the hospital environment are progressively made lower to better prepare stroke survivors for discharge home.

Objective

To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and potential health benefits of an 8-week home-based neurofeedback intervention.

Design

Single-group preliminary study.

Setting

Community-based.

Participants

Nine community dwelling adults with chronic neuropathic pain, 6 women and 3 men, with an average age of 51.9 years (range, 19-78 years) and with a 7-day average minimum pain score of 4 of 10 on the visual analog pain scale.

Interventions

A minimum of 5 neurofeedback sessions per week (40min/session) for 8 consecutive weeks was undertaken with a 12-week follow-up baseline electroencephalography recording period.

Main Outcome Measures

Primary feasibility outcomes: accessibility, tolerability, safety (adverse events and resolution), and human and information technology (IT) resources required. Secondary outcomes: pain, sensitization, catastrophization, anxiety, depression, sleep, health-related quality of life, electroencephalographic activity, and simple participant feedback.

Results

Of the 23 people screened, 11 were eligible for recruitment. One withdrew and another completed insufficient sessions for analysis, which resulted in 9 datasets analyzed. Three participants withdrew from the follow-up baselines, leaving 6 who completed the entire trial protocol. Thirteen adverse events were recorded and resolved: 1 was treatment-related, 4 were equipment-related, and 8 were administrative-related (eg, courier communication issues). The human and IT resources necessary for trial implementation were identified. There were also significant improvements in pain levels, depression, and anxiety. Six of 9 participants perceived minimal improvement or no change in symptoms after the trial, and 5 of 9 participants were satisfied with the treatment received.

Conclusions

It is feasible and safe to conduct a home-based trial of a neurofeedback intervention for people with chronic neuropathic pain, when the human and IT resources are provided and relevant governance processes are followed. Improvements in secondary outcomes merit investigation with a randomized controlled trial.

Objective

To identify potential barriers and obstacles preventing clinicians from adopting ultrasound for spasticity management.

Design

A prospective, cross-sectional national survey.

Setting

Web-based platform.

Participants

Thirty-six physicians and surgeons from across Canada.

Interventions

Survey completion.

Main Outcome Measures

The use of ultrasound in clinical spasticity practice, perceived barriers, and risks associated with its implementation.

Results

In total, 36 Canadian physicians and surgeons responded. A total of 91% reported using the US in their practice. Nearly all of them used ultrasonography (US) to guide injections and reported using more than 1 guidance technique for their injections. Less than half of the survey respondents reported using the US for muscle architecture assessment or longitudinal evaluation of muscle echo intensity. A total of 47% of survey respondents reported that they believe there are disadvantages associated with US use in spasticity practice. Disadvantages included increased time requirements resulting in discomfort for the injector and patient, the risk of infection after the procedure, and the risk of needle-stick injury. The most important barrier identified was the increased time demands of US compared with other guidance techniques. Other barriers included a lack of feedback on identifying a spastic muscle compared with electrical guidance techniques, a lack of additional remuneration to complete injections under ultrasound guidance, and a lack of adequate training.

Conclusions

Future educational efforts should address clinicians’ lack of familiarity with US purposes outside of injection guidance. This survey has highlighted the need for a curriculum shift in spasticity education to improve physician's scanning and injection technique, to address concerns about increased time requirements for injecting under ultrasound guidance and to address perceived disadvantages from clinicians.

Social determinants are nonmedical factors frequently used to study disparities in health outcomes but have not been widely explored in regard to rehabilitation service utilization. In our National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development-funded study, Access to and Effectiveness of Community-Based Rehabilitation After Stroke, we reviewed several conceptual models and frameworks for the study of social determinants to inform our work. The overall objective of this special communication is to describe our approach to identifying, selecting, and using area-level measures of social determinants to explore the relationship between social determinants and rehabilitation use. We present our methods for developing a conceptual model and a methodologic framework for the selection of social determinant measures relevant to rehabilitation use, as well as an overview of publicly available data on social determinants. We then discuss the methodologic challenges encountered and future directions for this work.

A 65-year-old woman presenting with a sensory ganglionopathy complicated with COVID-19 is limited in her rehabilitation due to pain from lateral compartment knee osteoarthritis. To increase participation in rehabilitation, cryoneurolysis of the medial and lateral anterior femoral cutaneous nerve and infrapatellar branches of the saphenous nerve was provided to manage pain associated with knee osteoarthritis. The patient reported immediate relief from pain. Physiotherapy noted improvement immediately after the procedure. Follow-ups at 7- and 11-days post-treatment revealed ongoing increases in mobility and reduction in pain. The patient was discharged to live independently shortly after cryoneurolysis. Cryoneurolysis for knee osteoarthritis could be considered as a treatment option to increase participation in rehabilitation for hospital inpatients who are stalled in their rehabilitation due to pain and poor mobility from knee osteoarthritis.

Survivors of neurologic injury (most commonly stroke or traumatic brain injury) frequently experience a disorder in which contralesionally positioned objects or the contralesional features of individual objects are often left unattended or underappreciated. The disorder is known by >200 unique labels in the literature, which potentially causes confusion for patients and their families, complicates literature searches for researchers and clinicians, and promotes a fractionated conceptualization of the disorder. The objective of this Delphi was to determine if consensus (≥75% agreement) could be reached by an international and multidisciplinary panel of researchers and clinicians with expertise on the topic.

To accomplish this aim, we used a modified Delphi method in which 66 researchers and/or clinicians with expertise on the topic completed at least 1 of 4 iterative rounds of surveys. Per the Delphi method, panelists were provided with results from each round prior to responding to the survey in the subsequent round with the explicit intention of achieving consensus. The panel ultimately reached consensus that the disorder should be consistently labeled spatial neglect. Based on the consensus reached by our expert panel, we recommend that researchers and clinicians use the label spatial neglect when describing the disorder in general and more specific labels pertaining to subtypes of the disorder when appropriate.

Objective

To determine whether chronic pain persists after complete spinal cord injury (SCI).

Design

Prospective observational study regarding the outcome of pre-existent chronic pain of inpatients admitted with new clinically diagnosed complete cervical SCI. For patients who acknowledged chronic pain of ≥3 years duration before the SCI, further questions explored whether they still experienced that pain, whether they were experiencing current posttraumatic pain, and whether they had any past exposure to opioids. The included patients were identified during the initial consultation in the trauma center for treatment of the SCI.

Setting

Level I trauma center.

Participants

From a total of 49 participants with acute cervical SCI with clinically diagnosed complete motor and sensory tetraplegia admitted between 2018 and 2020, 7 were selected on the basis of a history of chronic pain.

Intervention

Collected complete history and performed physical examination with serial follow-ups during the acute hospital stay until death or discharge.

Main Outcome Measures

The primary outcome was a finding of chronic pain experienced before new clinical diagnosis of complete SCI, compared with whether or not that pain continued after the SCI injury. The secondary outcome was the relation of persistent pain with opioid use; it was formulated after data collection.

Results

Among 49 patients with clinically diagnosed complete cervical SCIs, 7 had experienced prior chronic pain. Four participants experienced a continuation of the prior pain after their complete tetraplegia (4/7), whereas 3 participants did not (3/7). All the participants with continued pain had been previously treated with opioids, whereas those whose pain ceased had not received chronic opioid therapy.

Conclusions

There may be a unique form of chronic pain that is based in the brain, irrespective of peripheral pain or spinal mechanisms. Otherwise healthy people with longstanding antecedent chronic pain whose pain persists after acute clinically complete SCI with tetraplegia may provide a new model for evaluation of brain-based pain. Opioids may be requisite for this type of pain.

Objective

To evaluate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of the transition of an outpatient center-based rehabilitation program for middle and older aged Veterans with mobility limitations to a tele-health platform.

Design

Non-randomized non-controlled pilot study including 10 treatment sessions over 8 weeks and assessments at baseline, 8, 16, and 24 weeks.

Setting

VA Boston Healthcare System ambulatory care between August 2020 and March 2021.

Participants

Veterans aged 50 years and older (n=178) were contacted via letter to participate, and 21 enrolled in the study.

Intervention

Participants had virtual intervention sessions with a physical therapist who addressed impairments linked to mobility decline and a coaching program promoting exercise adherence.

Main Outcome Measures

Ambulatory Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC), Phone-FITT, and Self-Efficacy for Exercise (SEE) scale.

Results

Completers (n=14, mean age 74.9 years, 86% men) averaged 9.8 out of 10 visits. Changes in the Ambulatory Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) exceeded clinically meaningful change after 8 and 24 weeks of treatment, at 4.1 units and 4.3 units respectively. Statistically significant improvements from baseline in AM-PAC and Phone-FITT were observed after 8 weeks of treatment and at 24 weeks. No significant changes were observed in exercise self-efficacy.

Conclusions

In this group of veterans, telerehab was feasible and demonstrated preliminary efficacy in both mobility and physical activity, thus justifying further investigation in a larger scale clinical trial.

Objectives

To investigate the amount of Leisure-Time Physical Activity (LTPA) that people over 45 years with a spinal cord injury (SCI) performed and to determine the frequency, duration, intensity, and modality of LTPA performed.

Data Sources

We searched 5 major electronic databases (CINAHL, SCOPUS, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PubMed) from inception to March 2023.

Study Selection

Cross-sectional, longitudinal studies and control arm of controlled trials that assessed LTPA in participants over 45 years old, with a SCI. We included 19 studies in the review and 11 in the meta-analysis.

Data Extraction

We followed the PRISMA checklist for Systematic Reviews. Two review authors independently assessed the risk of bias and extracted data on participants’ demographics, injury characteristics, and LTPA participation of the included studies. Risk of bias was assessed using the Joanne Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies. Any conflicts were resolved by a third author.

Data Synthesis

We found considerable variability in LTPA participation in adults 45 years and older with SCI. An estimated 27%-64% of participants did not take part in any LTPA. A random effects meta-analysis model was completed for studies that reported total or moderate-to-heavy LTPA scores in minutes per week. Overall, participants (n=1675) engaged in 260 [205;329] (mean [95% CI]) mins/week of total LTPA. Those participating in moderate-heavy intensity LTPA (n=364) completed 173 [118; 255] (mean [95% CI]) mins/week. LTPA modalities included walking, wheeling, hand-cycling, basketball, and swimming, among others.

Conclusions

While many older adults with SCI seem to be meeting the recommended weekly physical activity volume, many still remain sedentary. There was significant variation in reporting of frequency, intensity, and duration of LTPA and reporting on modality was limited. Because of differences in reporting, it was challenging to compare results across studies. Data constraints prevented subgroup analysis of LTPA disparities between paraplegia and tetraplegia.