首页 > 最新文献

Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation最新文献

英文 中文
Home-Based Gait Interventions for Adults with Stroke: A Scoping Review 以家庭为基础的成人卒中步态干预:范围综述
IF 2 Q2 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100527
Brianne Darcy PT, DPT, DHSc , Kyle B. Reed PhD , Stacy J.M. Bamberg ScD , Donal Murray PhD, CSCS , Joyce Maring EdD, DPT

Objective

To map the peer-reviewed literature regarding the methods and outcomes of home-based gait interventions for adults with stroke.

Data Sources

PubMed, Cumulative Index To Nursing & Allied Health Literature, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for relevant studies based on the terms “stroke,” “gait,” “home,” and “treatment,” filtered for 2015 to 2025 publications. Searches occurred on September 12, 2024, and were updated on January 10, 2025.

Study Selection

Eligibility screening was performed in 2 stages: title/abstract screening and full-text review. In each stage, articles were screened against the inclusion/exclusion criteria by 2 independent reviewers.

Data Extraction

Using a customized spreadsheet, we extracted characteristics of the studies, demographic and clinical participant characteristics, gait treatment and assessment methodologies, and reported outcomes. One author extracted the data, and a second cross-checked for accuracy.

Data Synthesis

The titles/abstracts of 1923 articles were screened, and 116 articles underwent full-text review. Sixty-two studies met the eligibility criteria. The studies were conducted in 22 countries and included 3008 adults with chronic or subacute stroke. Home-based rehabilitation was used as a standalone treatment in 61% of studies and paired with or immediately after another rehabilitation intervention in 39% of studies. Gait treatment approaches included technology-integrated home programs (34%), home-use devices (19%), individualized home rehabilitation (15%), self-management or coaching-based programs (13%), home rehabilitation delivered by trained nonclinicians (11%), and task-specific training variations (8%). Gait speed and endurance were the most common assessments. Measurements frequently occurred in clinical settings. At least 60% of studies within each category reported statistically significant or clinically meaningful impacts on specific gait outcomes.

Conclusions

Home-based rehabilitation demonstrates global interest. Current evidence related to gait treatment is heterogeneous and shows a prevalence of technology and innovation for the home. A substantial number of preliminary studies suggest emerging treatment methods requiring robust, larger studies to determine the most beneficial treatments and contexts.
目的对以家庭为基础的成人脑卒中步态干预的方法和结果进行同行评议。数据来源:pubmed、护理和联合健康文献累积索引、Cochrane、Scopus和Web of Science根据“中风”、“步态”、“家庭”和“治疗”等术语搜索相关研究,过滤2015年至2025年的出版物。搜索发生在2024年9月12日,并在2025年1月10日更新。研究选择资格筛选分为两个阶段:标题/摘要筛选和全文审查。在每个阶段,文章由2名独立审稿人根据纳入/排除标准进行筛选。数据提取使用定制的电子表格,我们提取了研究的特征,人口统计学和临床参与者特征,步态治疗和评估方法,以及报告的结果。一位作者提取了数据,另一位对其准确性进行了交叉检查。数据综合筛选了1923篇文章的标题/摘要,对116篇文章进行了全文审查。62项研究符合入选标准。这些研究在22个国家进行,包括3008名患有慢性或亚急性中风的成年人。61%的研究将家庭康复作为独立治疗,39%的研究将家庭康复与另一项康复干预相结合或紧接着进行。步态治疗方法包括技术集成家庭项目(34%)、家庭使用设备(19%)、个性化家庭康复(15%)、自我管理或基于教练的项目(13%)、由训练有素的非临床医生提供的家庭康复(11%)和特定任务的培训变化(8%)。步态速度和耐力是最常见的评估。测量经常发生在临床环境中。每个类别中至少60%的研究报告了对特定步态结果的统计显着或临床有意义的影响。结论居家康复受到全球关注。目前与步态治疗相关的证据是不同的,并且显示了家庭技术和创新的普遍性。大量的初步研究表明,新兴的治疗方法需要强有力的、更大规模的研究来确定最有益的治疗方法和环境。
{"title":"Home-Based Gait Interventions for Adults with Stroke: A Scoping Review","authors":"Brianne Darcy PT, DPT, DHSc ,&nbsp;Kyle B. Reed PhD ,&nbsp;Stacy J.M. Bamberg ScD ,&nbsp;Donal Murray PhD, CSCS ,&nbsp;Joyce Maring EdD, DPT","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100527","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100527","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To map the peer-reviewed literature regarding the methods and outcomes of home-based gait interventions for adults with stroke.</div></div><div><h3>Data Sources</h3><div>PubMed, Cumulative Index To Nursing &amp; Allied Health Literature, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for relevant studies based on the terms “stroke,” “gait,” “home,” and “treatment,” filtered for 2015 to 2025 publications. Searches occurred on September 12, 2024, and were updated on January 10, 2025.</div></div><div><h3>Study Selection</h3><div>Eligibility screening was performed in 2 stages: title/abstract screening and full-text review. In each stage, articles were screened against the inclusion/exclusion criteria by 2 independent reviewers.</div></div><div><h3>Data Extraction</h3><div>Using a customized spreadsheet, we extracted characteristics of the studies, demographic and clinical participant characteristics, gait treatment and assessment methodologies, and reported outcomes. One author extracted the data, and a second cross-checked for accuracy.</div></div><div><h3>Data Synthesis</h3><div>The titles/abstracts of 1923 articles were screened, and 116 articles underwent full-text review. Sixty-two studies met the eligibility criteria. The studies were conducted in 22 countries and included 3008 adults with chronic or subacute stroke. Home-based rehabilitation was used as a standalone treatment in 61% of studies and paired with or immediately after another rehabilitation intervention in 39% of studies. Gait treatment approaches included technology-integrated home programs (34%), home-use devices (19%), individualized home rehabilitation (15%), self-management or coaching-based programs (13%), home rehabilitation delivered by trained nonclinicians (11%), and task-specific training variations (8%). Gait speed and endurance were the most common assessments. Measurements frequently occurred in clinical settings. At least 60% of studies within each category reported statistically significant or clinically meaningful impacts on specific gait outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Home-based rehabilitation demonstrates global interest. Current evidence related to gait treatment is heterogeneous and shows a prevalence of technology and innovation for the home. A substantial number of preliminary studies suggest emerging treatment methods requiring robust, larger studies to determine the most beneficial treatments and contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"7 4","pages":"Article 100527"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145739023","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative Efficacy of Different Prehabilitation Strategies in Colorectal Surgery Patients: A Network Meta-Analysis 结直肠手术患者不同康复策略的比较疗效:网络荟萃分析
IF 2 Q2 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100523
Jing-Yi Gao BS , Jie-Rong Ge BS , Jing-Yan Cai BS , Li-Hua Wang MS

Objectives

To evaluate the effect of various prehabilitation strategies on postoperative functional capacity, complication rates, length of hospital stay, and readmission rates in colorectal surgery patients through a network meta-analysis.

Date Sources

A systematic search was performed across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception to April 2025.

Study Selection

Randomized controlled trials comparing different prehabilitation strategies (multimodal prehabilitation, exercise-only, nutrition-only, and postoperative rehabilitation) with standard care or against each other were included.

Data Extraction

Two investigators independently screened titles/abstracts and assessed full texts for eligibility, with discrepancies resolved through consensus or consultation with a third reviewer. The extracted data included the first author’s name, publication year, country, design, sample size, participants’ age, sex, pathology, surgical procedure, intervention type, and reported outcomes.

Data Synthesis

Fifteen studies involving 1290 participants were included. Compared with standard care, exercise intervention (mean difference, 62.85m; 95% CI, 9.44-116.12m) and multimodal prehabilitation (mean difference, 29.36m; 95% CI, 1.98-67.01m) significantly improved 6-minute walk test performance. Multimodal prehabilitation demonstrated superior efficacy in reducing postoperative complications (odds ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.40-0.96), whereas other intervention methods showed no significant differences compared with standard care. The results of the network meta-analysis indicated that the best probability of improving the 6-minute walk test results was exercise intervention > multimodal prerehabilitation > nutritional intervention > postoperative rehabilitation > standard care. Heterogeneity across studies was low (I²<30%), with minimal risk of publication bias.

Conclusions

Multimodal prehabilitation emerges as the optimal preoperative strategy for colorectal surgery patients, significantly reducing complication risks and enhancing functional capacity. Exercise-only interventions also demonstrate clinically meaningful benefits in functional improvement. Tailored prehabilitation protocols should be implemented based on patient-specific needs and resource availability.
目的通过网络荟萃分析,评价不同康复策略对结直肠手术患者术后功能能力、并发症发生率、住院时间和再入院率的影响。数据来源系统检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science和Scopus,检索时间从成立到2025年4月。研究选择纳入比较不同康复策略(多模式康复、纯运动、纯营养和术后康复)与标准治疗或相互对照的随机对照试验。两名研究者独立筛选标题/摘要并评估全文的合格性,通过与第三方审稿人达成共识或协商解决差异。提取的数据包括第一作者姓名、出版年份、国家、设计、样本量、受试者年龄、性别、病理、手术方式、干预类型和报告结果。数据综合纳入15项研究,涉及1290名参与者。与标准治疗相比,运动干预(平均差值为62.85m, 95% CI为9.44-116.12m)和多模式康复(平均差值为29.36m, 95% CI为1.98-67.01m)显著改善了6分钟步行测试成绩。多模式预适应在减少术后并发症方面表现出优越的疗效(优势比为0.65;95% CI为0.40-0.96),而其他干预方法与标准护理相比无显著差异。网络荟萃分析结果显示,改善6分钟步行测试结果的最佳概率为运动干预、多模式康复前干预、营养干预、术后康复和标准护理。各研究的异质性较低(I²<30%),发表偏倚风险最小。结论多模式康复是结直肠手术患者的最佳术前策略,可显著降低并发症风险,增强功能。仅运动干预在功能改善方面也显示出有临床意义的益处。应根据患者具体需求和资源可用性实施量身定制的康复方案。
{"title":"Comparative Efficacy of Different Prehabilitation Strategies in Colorectal Surgery Patients: A Network Meta-Analysis","authors":"Jing-Yi Gao BS ,&nbsp;Jie-Rong Ge BS ,&nbsp;Jing-Yan Cai BS ,&nbsp;Li-Hua Wang MS","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100523","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100523","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate the effect of various prehabilitation strategies on postoperative functional capacity, complication rates, length of hospital stay, and readmission rates in colorectal surgery patients through a network meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Date Sources</h3><div>A systematic search was performed across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception to April 2025.</div></div><div><h3>Study Selection</h3><div>Randomized controlled trials comparing different prehabilitation strategies (multimodal prehabilitation, exercise-only, nutrition-only, and postoperative rehabilitation) with standard care or against each other were included<strong>.</strong></div></div><div><h3>Data Extraction</h3><div>Two investigators independently screened titles/abstracts and assessed full texts for eligibility, with discrepancies resolved through consensus or consultation with a third reviewer. The extracted data included the first author’s name, publication year, country, design, sample size, participants’ age, sex, pathology, surgical procedure, intervention type, and reported outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Data Synthesis</h3><div>Fifteen studies involving 1290 participants were included. Compared with standard care, exercise intervention (mean difference, 62.85m; 95% CI, 9.44-116.12m) and multimodal prehabilitation (mean difference, 29.36m; 95% CI, 1.98-67.01m) significantly improved 6-minute walk test performance. Multimodal prehabilitation demonstrated superior efficacy in reducing postoperative complications (odds ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.40-0.96), whereas other intervention methods showed no significant differences compared with standard care. The results of the network meta-analysis indicated that the best probability of improving the 6-minute walk test results was exercise intervention &gt; multimodal prerehabilitation &gt; nutritional intervention &gt; postoperative rehabilitation &gt; standard care. Heterogeneity across studies was low (I²&lt;30%), with minimal risk of publication bias.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Multimodal prehabilitation emerges as the optimal preoperative strategy for colorectal surgery patients, significantly reducing complication risks and enhancing functional capacity. Exercise-only interventions also demonstrate clinically meaningful benefits in functional improvement. Tailored prehabilitation protocols should be implemented based on patient-specific needs and resource availability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"7 4","pages":"Article 100523"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145739022","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Enhancing Outpatient Clinic Recruitment: A Quality Improvement Strategy for a Prospective Research Study 加强门诊招聘:一项前瞻性研究的质量改进策略
IF 2 Q2 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100539
Priya D. Bolikal MD , Ryan Schuetter BS , Tess Guzman BS , Richa Patel MPH , Paul J. Gubanich MD, MPH , Shari L. Wade PhD , Lynn Babcock MD, MS , Megan Narad PhD , Sarah M. Eickmeyer MD , Brad G. Kurowski MD, MS

Objective

To improve study recruitment by increasing the number of eligible participants who receive study information during their outpatient clinical care.

Design

Quality improvement study.

Setting

Outpatient clinics from July 2024 to January 2025.

Participants

Eligible patients across 16 outpatient clinics (N=231, mean age=14.1 ± 2.0 y, women=46%, White=74%).

Interventions

Using quality improvement methodology, the team identified barriers and key drivers for recruitment from clinics. The initial interventions included designating and engaging a clinical staff member in each clinic to distribute study information (recruitment champion), notifying them of potentially eligible patients, tracking progress, and incentivizing recruitment with small rewards. Recruitment was tracked and reviewed monthly to assess progress and identify interventions for ongoing iterations.

Main Outcome Measures

Primary: Percentage of eligible patients who received study information during their clinic visit. Secondary: Study enrollment rates.

Results

During this period, 58.9% of eligible patients received study information during their clinic visits (baseline rate from prior similar study=32.6%). Enrollment from clinic contact averaged 59% (baseline rate from prior similar study=21.8%). Chi-square test indicated a significantly higher proportion of patients received information about the study from clinic staff compared with the prior similar study (χ2=36.06, P<.001), and those receiving information about the study in clinic corresponded with a higher rate of enrollment compared with the group that did not receive information in clinic (χ2=21.33, P<.001).

Conclusions

This project demonstrates the successful application of quality improvement methodology toward optimizing clinical recruitment. Approaches used in this study can potentially be generalized to other outpatient clinical populations and research studies.
目的通过增加在门诊临床护理期间接受研究信息的合格参与者的数量来改善研究招募。设计质量改进研究。门诊门诊从2024年7月到2025年1月。16家门诊诊所的合格患者(N=231,平均年龄=14.1±2.0 y,女性=46%,白人=74%)。干预措施使用质量改进方法,团队确定了从诊所招募的障碍和关键驱动因素。最初的干预措施包括在每个诊所指定并聘请一名临床工作人员分发研究信息(招募冠军),通知他们潜在的合格患者,跟踪进展,并以小额奖励激励招募。每月对招聘进行跟踪和审查,以评估进展并确定正在进行的迭代的干预措施。主要结果测量:在临床访问期间接受研究信息的合格患者的百分比。第二:学习入学率。结果在此期间,58.9%的符合条件的患者在就诊期间获得了研究信息(先前类似研究的基线率=32.6%)。临床接触入组率平均为59%(先前类似研究的基线率为21.8%)。卡方检验显示,从临床工作人员处获得研究信息的患者比例明显高于既往类似研究(χ2=36.06, p < 0.01),从临床工作人员处获得研究信息的患者入组率明显高于未从临床工作人员处获得研究信息的患者(χ2=21.33, p < 0.01)。结论本项目展示了质量改进方法在优化临床招募中的成功应用。本研究中使用的方法有可能推广到其他门诊临床人群和研究。
{"title":"Enhancing Outpatient Clinic Recruitment: A Quality Improvement Strategy for a Prospective Research Study","authors":"Priya D. Bolikal MD ,&nbsp;Ryan Schuetter BS ,&nbsp;Tess Guzman BS ,&nbsp;Richa Patel MPH ,&nbsp;Paul J. Gubanich MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Shari L. Wade PhD ,&nbsp;Lynn Babcock MD, MS ,&nbsp;Megan Narad PhD ,&nbsp;Sarah M. Eickmeyer MD ,&nbsp;Brad G. Kurowski MD, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100539","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100539","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To improve study recruitment by increasing the number of eligible participants who receive study information during their outpatient clinical care.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Quality improvement study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Outpatient clinics from July 2024 to January 2025.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Eligible patients across 16 outpatient clinics (N=231, mean age=14.1 ± 2.0 y, women=46%, White=74%).</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Using quality improvement methodology, the team identified barriers and key drivers for recruitment from clinics. The initial interventions included designating and engaging a clinical staff member in each clinic to distribute study information (recruitment champion), notifying them of potentially eligible patients, tracking progress, and incentivizing recruitment with small rewards. Recruitment was tracked and reviewed monthly to assess progress and identify interventions for ongoing iterations.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Primary: Percentage of eligible patients who received study information during their clinic visit. Secondary: Study enrollment rates.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>During this period, 58.9% of eligible patients received study information during their clinic visits (baseline rate from prior similar study=32.6%). Enrollment from clinic contact averaged 59% (baseline rate from prior similar study=21.8%). Chi-square test indicated a significantly higher proportion of patients received information about the study from clinic staff compared with the prior similar study (χ<sup>2</sup>=36.06, <em>P</em>&lt;.001), and those receiving information about the study in clinic corresponded with a higher rate of enrollment compared with the group that did not receive information in clinic (χ<sup>2</sup>=21.33, <em>P</em>&lt;.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This project demonstrates the successful application of quality improvement methodology toward optimizing clinical recruitment. Approaches used in this study can potentially be generalized to other outpatient clinical populations and research studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"7 4","pages":"Article 100539"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145739231","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Women Veterans and Mobility Aids 女性退伍军人和行动辅助设备
IF 2 Q2 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100503
Pooja Solanki MPH , Brad E. Dicianno MD , Alicia M. Koontz PhD , Kelsey Berryman PhD , Frances M. Weaver PhD

Objective

To conduct a needs assessment to learn about women Veterans’ needs, priorities, preferences, and experiences with mobility assistive technology (MAT).

Design

Cross-sectional survey study.

Setting

National survey.

Participants

Women veterans (age, ≥18y) receiving care from the Veterans Health Administration who received MAT in the last 5 years participated in an online survey (N=700).

Interventions

None.

Main Outcome Measures

The survey included questions regarding demographics, experiences with procurement, evaluation, and follow-up for MAT, and ability to participate in various activities.

Results

Seven hundred women veterans responded to the online survey but due to missing responses only 593 surveys were analyzed. The most commonly used MAT included canes (26%), walkers (24%), and manual or power wheelchairs (29%). Activities for which their assistive mobility device did not meet their needs included housework (26%), leisure (22%), and social activities (19%). Some women veterans identified challenges with their device related to the design and lack of options when choosing a device. Although a majority of veterans reported positive feedback in procuring their MAT, there were opportunities for improvement in follow-up.

Conclusions

Approximately 1 out of 5 women indicated that their devices did not meet some of their needs. The unique needs of women veterans should be considered during the design and provision of MAT, and education should be provided on maintenance of the MAT. Future research is warranted to develop possible solutions for these gaps with the goal of improving women veterans’ experiences and function related to MAT.
目的进行需求评估,了解女性退伍军人对行动辅助技术(MAT)的需求、优先级、偏好和经验。设计横断面调查研究。SettingNational调查。参与者:在过去5年内接受过MAT治疗的退伍军人健康管理局护理的女性退伍军人(年龄≥18岁)参加了一项在线调查(N=700)。主要结果测量调查包括人口统计、采购经验、评估和MAT后续工作以及参与各种活动的能力等问题。结果有700名女性退伍军人参与了在线调查,但由于缺少回复,仅分析了593份调查。最常用的MAT包括手杖(26%)、助行器(24%)和手动或电动轮椅(29%)。辅助行动装置不能满足其需要的活动包括家务(26%)、休闲(22%)和社交活动(19%)。一些女性退伍军人认为,在选择设备时,她们面临的挑战与设计和缺乏选择有关。虽然大多数退伍军人报告在获得MAT方面的积极反馈,但在随访中仍有改进的机会。结论:大约五分之一的女性表示,她们的医疗器械不能满足她们的某些需求。在MAT的设计和提供过程中应考虑到女性退伍军人的独特需求,并应提供MAT维护方面的教育。未来的研究应针对这些差距制定可能的解决方案,以改善女性退伍军人的体验和与MAT相关的功能。
{"title":"Women Veterans and Mobility Aids","authors":"Pooja Solanki MPH ,&nbsp;Brad E. Dicianno MD ,&nbsp;Alicia M. Koontz PhD ,&nbsp;Kelsey Berryman PhD ,&nbsp;Frances M. Weaver PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100503","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100503","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To conduct a needs assessment to learn about women Veterans’ needs, priorities, preferences, and experiences with mobility assistive technology (MAT).</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Cross-sectional survey study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>National survey.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Women veterans (age, ≥18y) receiving care from the Veterans Health Administration who received MAT in the last 5 years participated in an online survey (N=700).</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>None.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>The survey included questions regarding demographics, experiences with procurement, evaluation, and follow-up for MAT, and ability to participate in various activities.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seven hundred women veterans responded to the online survey but due to missing responses only 593 surveys were analyzed. The most commonly used MAT included canes (26%), walkers (24%), and manual or power wheelchairs (29%). Activities for which their assistive mobility device did not meet their needs included housework (26%), leisure (22%), and social activities (19%). Some women veterans identified challenges with their device related to the design and lack of options when choosing a device. Although a majority of veterans reported positive feedback in procuring their MAT, there were opportunities for improvement in follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Approximately 1 out of 5 women indicated that their devices did not meet some of their needs. The unique needs of women veterans should be considered during the design and provision of MAT, and education should be provided on maintenance of the MAT. Future research is warranted to develop possible solutions for these gaps with the goal of improving women veterans’ experiences and function related to MAT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"7 4","pages":"Article 100503"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145739229","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluation of Clemastine’s Effects on Clinical and Electrodiagnostic Parameters in Individuals With CTS: A Preliminary Placebo-Controlled Double-Blind RCT 评价Clemastine对CTS患者临床和电诊断参数的影响:一项初步安慰剂对照双盲随机对照试验
IF 2 Q2 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100502
Kamyar Kazemi MD , Gholamreza Raissi MD , Tannaz Ahadi MD , Seyed Pezhman Madani MD , Simin Sajadi MD , Hosna Soleymanzadeh MSc , Negar Kariznoee PharmD

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of clemastine in improving clinical and electrophysiological outcomes in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) when combined with standard splint therapy.

Design

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial with follow-up assessments at 1 and 3 months.

Setting

A physical medicine and rehabilitation outpatient clinic.

Participants

Adult patients (N=27) (mean age=46.4y; sex ratio, 29.2% men and 70.8% women), enrolled with electrodiagnostically confirmed mild to moderate CTS, were randomized into clemastine (n=14) and placebo (n=13) groups.

Interventions

The treatment group received 1 mg oral clemastine nightly plus a wrist splint, while the control group received a placebo plus an identical wrist splint, with both interventions maintained for 3 months.

Main Outcome Measures

Primary endpoints included Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire Symptom Severity (BQ-SS) and Functional Status (BQ-FS) scores, nerve conduction study parameters (median nerve sensory and motor distal latency), and ultrasonographic median nerve cross-sectional area.

Results

The case group showed a significant difference in follow-up mean BQ-FS and BQ-SS scores (ANOVA, p<.01) at 1 month and 3 months compared with the control. No significant differences were found in the nerve conduction study or ultrasonographic cross-sectional area between groups.

Conclusions

Clemastine, combined with wrist splinting, may provide further clinical benefits in patients with CTS, particularly in improving BQ-SS and BQ-FS outcomes. Further research is necessary to confirm these findings and explore appropriate dosing options.
目的评价clemastine联合标准夹板治疗腕管综合征(CTS)的临床和电生理效果。设计一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验,在1个月和3个月进行随访评估。设置物理医学与康复门诊。参与者成年患者(N=27)(平均年龄46.4岁,性别比例为男性29.2%,女性70.8%),电诊断确诊为轻中度CTS,随机分为克莱马斯坦组(N= 14)和安慰剂组(N= 13)。干预措施:治疗组每晚口服1毫克克莱马斯汀加腕夹板,而对照组服用安慰剂加相同的腕夹板,两种干预均维持3个月。主要终点包括波士顿腕管问卷症状严重程度(BQ-SS)和功能状态(BQ-FS)评分、神经传导研究参数(正中神经感觉和运动远端潜伏期)、超声正中神经横截面积。结果病例组随访1个月和3个月时BQ-FS和BQ-SS评分与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(方差分析,p < 0.01)。两组间神经传导研究及超声截面积无明显差异。结论来马汀联合腕夹板可为CTS患者提供进一步的临床益处,特别是在改善BQ-SS和BQ-FS结局方面。需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现并探索适当的给药方案。
{"title":"Evaluation of Clemastine’s Effects on Clinical and Electrodiagnostic Parameters in Individuals With CTS: A Preliminary Placebo-Controlled Double-Blind RCT","authors":"Kamyar Kazemi MD ,&nbsp;Gholamreza Raissi MD ,&nbsp;Tannaz Ahadi MD ,&nbsp;Seyed Pezhman Madani MD ,&nbsp;Simin Sajadi MD ,&nbsp;Hosna Soleymanzadeh MSc ,&nbsp;Negar Kariznoee PharmD","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100502","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100502","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the efficacy of clemastine in improving clinical and electrophysiological outcomes in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) when combined with standard splint therapy.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial with follow-up assessments at 1 and 3 months.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>A physical medicine and rehabilitation outpatient clinic.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Adult patients (N=27) (mean age=46.4y; sex ratio, 29.2% men and 70.8% women), enrolled with electrodiagnostically confirmed mild to moderate CTS, were randomized into clemastine (n=14) and placebo (n=13) groups.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>The treatment group received 1 mg oral clemastine nightly plus a wrist splint, while the control group received a placebo plus an identical wrist splint, with both interventions maintained for 3 months.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Primary endpoints included Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire Symptom Severity (BQ-SS) and Functional Status (BQ-FS) scores, nerve conduction study parameters (median nerve sensory and motor distal latency), and ultrasonographic median nerve cross-sectional area.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The case group showed a significant difference in follow-up mean BQ-FS and BQ-SS scores (ANOVA, <em>p</em>&lt;.01) at 1 month and 3 months compared with the control. No significant differences were found in the nerve conduction study or ultrasonographic cross-sectional area between groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Clemastine, combined with wrist splinting, may provide further clinical benefits in patients with CTS, particularly in improving BQ-SS and BQ-FS outcomes. Further research is necessary to confirm these findings and explore appropriate dosing options.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"7 4","pages":"Article 100502"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145739230","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mapping Recovery: The RADAR Scale, Born From a Clinical Round 测绘恢复:雷达比例尺,诞生于临床回合
IF 2 Q2 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100528
Tao He MD, PhD, Yongxiang Yu MB, Kaijie Jiang MB

Objective

To introduce a novel, patient-centered assessment tool, the RADAR (Reach, Activities, Dexterity, Awareness, Role) scale, designed to quantify functional recovery and facilitate communication in patients with nerve injuries, particularly when functional improvement differs from electrophysiological data.

Design

This proof-of-concept study details the development and retrospective application of a new assessment scale derived from a single case observation.

Setting

An inpatient ward at an orthopedic center.

Participants

A 73-year-old woman who developed complete radial nerve palsy after a humeral shaft fracture.

Interventions

The patient underwent open reduction and internal fixation with radial nerve neurolysis, followed by a 7-month rehabilitation program.

Main Outcome Measures

The RADAR scale, a 10-item, 50-point tool assessing functional recovery, was retrospectively applied. Scores were compared with serial electromyogram reports of motor nerve amplitude.

Results

The patient’s total RADAR score progressively improved from 0 preoperatively to 50 at 28 weeks, closely tracking her observed functional gains. In contrast, electromyogram data showed minimal improvement, with motor nerve amplitude remaining far below normal values, demonstrating a stark function-data dissociation.

Conclusions

The RADAR scale can effectively quantify patient-centered functional progress that may be overlooked by standard electrophysiological tests. As a simple tool integrating assessment with shared decision making, it holds potential to improve communication and humanize care in nerve injury rehabilitation. Its validity and reliability warrant investigation in larger prospective studies.
目的介绍一种新颖的、以患者为中心的评估工具RADAR (Reach, Activities, Dexterity, Awareness, Role)量表,旨在量化神经损伤患者的功能恢复和促进交流,特别是当功能改善与电生理数据不同时。设计:这一概念验证研究详细介绍了从单个病例观察中得出的新评估量表的开发和回顾性应用。骨科中心的住院病房参与者:一名73岁的女性,肱骨干骨折后发生完全性桡神经麻痹。干预措施:患者接受切开复位和桡神经松解术内固定,随后进行7个月的康复治疗。回顾性应用RADAR量表,一个10项50分的功能恢复评估工具。将评分与运动神经振幅的连续肌电图报告进行比较。结果患者的RADAR总评分从术前0分逐步提高到28周时的50分,密切跟踪其观察到的功能增益。相反,肌电图数据显示改善甚微,运动神经振幅仍远低于正常值,显示出明显的功能数据分离。结论雷达量表能有效量化以患者为中心的功能进展,而标准电生理检查可能会忽略这些进展。作为一种综合评估和共同决策的简单工具,它具有改善神经损伤康复沟通和人性化护理的潜力。它的有效性和可靠性值得在更大的前瞻性研究中进行调查。
{"title":"Mapping Recovery: The RADAR Scale, Born From a Clinical Round","authors":"Tao He MD, PhD,&nbsp;Yongxiang Yu MB,&nbsp;Kaijie Jiang MB","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100528","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100528","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To introduce a novel, patient-centered assessment tool, the RADAR (Reach, Activities, Dexterity, Awareness, Role) scale, designed to quantify functional recovery and facilitate communication in patients with nerve injuries, particularly when functional improvement differs from electrophysiological data.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>This proof-of-concept study details the development and retrospective application of a new assessment scale derived from a single case observation.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>An inpatient ward at an orthopedic center.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>A 73-year-old woman who developed complete radial nerve palsy after a humeral shaft fracture.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>The patient underwent open reduction and internal fixation with radial nerve neurolysis, followed by a 7-month rehabilitation program.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>The RADAR scale, a 10-item, 50-point tool assessing functional recovery, was retrospectively applied. Scores were compared with serial electromyogram reports of motor nerve amplitude.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The patient’s total RADAR score progressively improved from 0 preoperatively to 50 at 28 weeks, closely tracking her observed functional gains. In contrast, electromyogram data showed minimal improvement, with motor nerve amplitude remaining far below normal values, demonstrating a stark function-data dissociation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The RADAR scale can effectively quantify patient-centered functional progress that may be overlooked by standard electrophysiological tests. As a simple tool integrating assessment with shared decision making, it holds potential to improve communication and humanize care in nerve injury rehabilitation. Its validity and reliability warrant investigation in larger prospective studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"7 4","pages":"Article 100528"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145739171","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Role of Anxiety in Individuals with Generalized Joint Hypermobility: A Systematic Review 焦虑在广泛性关节过度活动个体中的作用:一项系统综述
IF 2 Q2 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100467
Janneke E. van Die-de Vries MSc , Eugene Rameckers PhD , Patrick Calders PhD , Raoul H. Engelbert PhD , Stephan P. Ramaekers PhD , Marielle E. Goossens PhD , Jeanine A. Verbunt PhD

Objective

To present an overview of the existing knowledge of the presence of anxiety in individuals with generalized joint hypermobility (GJH) in different phases of their life.

Data Sources

Medline, PsychINFO, and Cochrane were searched from inception to late August 2024.

Study Selection

Observational studies that included participants aged >12 years with GJH without comorbidities and psychiatric conditions and provided any information regarding fear or anxiety symptoms.

Data Extraction

Extracted data included study and population characteristics and data regarding anxiety and pain.

Data Synthesis

Of the 532 identified articles, 32 were included, with a total number of 12,116 subjects. Most studies (n=24) included adults aged >21 years. In total, 11 studies included a population with asymptomatic GJH, and 21 included a sample with symptomatic GJH. Findings on the presence of anxiety were similar in all life phases in individuals with symptomatic GJH whereas in individuals with asymptomatic GJH, people in earlier life phases tended to report less anxiety. Pain complaints were highly frequent in populations with symptomatic GJH. Increased levels of anxiety seemed to be related to higher levels of hypermobility. The highest levels of anxiety were found in individuals with symptomatic GJH followed by those with asymptomatic GJH, who showed slightly increased (but not significant) different levels of anxiety than their peers without GJH.

Conclusions

Anxiety may be related to the different stages of the spectrum of GJH, in terms of severity. This review supports the need to screen for anxiety in individuals with GJH in all life phases independent of their complaints.
目的对广泛性关节过动症(GJH)患者在不同生活阶段存在焦虑的现有知识进行综述。数据来源medline, PsychINFO和Cochrane从成立到2024年8月下旬进行检索。研究选择:观察性研究纳入年龄为12岁的GJH患者,无合并症和精神疾病,并提供有关恐惧或焦虑症状的任何信息。数据提取提取的数据包括研究和人群特征以及有关焦虑和疼痛的数据。在532篇确定的文章中,32篇被纳入,受试者总数为12116人。大多数研究(n=24)包括21岁的成年人。总共有11项研究纳入了无症状性GJH人群,21项研究纳入了有症状性GJH样本。在有症状的GJH个体的所有生命阶段中,焦虑存在的发现是相似的,而在无症状的GJH个体中,处于生命早期阶段的人倾向于报告较少的焦虑。疼痛主诉在有症状的GJH人群中非常常见。焦虑程度的增加似乎与高水平的多动症有关。焦虑水平最高的是有症状的GJH个体,其次是无症状的GJH个体,他们的焦虑水平比没有GJH的同龄人略有增加(但不显著)。结论GJH患者的焦虑程度可能与GJH谱系不同阶段有关。本综述支持在GJH患者独立于其抱怨的所有生命阶段筛查焦虑的必要性。
{"title":"Role of Anxiety in Individuals with Generalized Joint Hypermobility: A Systematic Review","authors":"Janneke E. van Die-de Vries MSc ,&nbsp;Eugene Rameckers PhD ,&nbsp;Patrick Calders PhD ,&nbsp;Raoul H. Engelbert PhD ,&nbsp;Stephan P. Ramaekers PhD ,&nbsp;Marielle E. Goossens PhD ,&nbsp;Jeanine A. Verbunt PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100467","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100467","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To present an overview of the existing knowledge of the presence of anxiety in individuals with generalized joint hypermobility (GJH) in different phases of their life.</div></div><div><h3>Data Sources</h3><div>Medline, PsychINFO, and Cochrane were searched from inception to late August 2024.</div></div><div><h3>Study Selection</h3><div>Observational studies that included participants aged &gt;12 years with GJH without comorbidities and psychiatric conditions and provided any information regarding fear or anxiety symptoms.</div></div><div><h3>Data Extraction</h3><div>Extracted data included study and population characteristics and data regarding anxiety and pain.</div></div><div><h3>Data Synthesis</h3><div>Of the 532 identified articles, 32 were included, with a total number of 12,116 subjects. Most studies (n=24) included adults aged &gt;21 years. In total, 11 studies included a population with asymptomatic GJH, and 21 included a sample with symptomatic GJH. Findings on the presence of anxiety were similar in all life phases in individuals with symptomatic GJH whereas in individuals with asymptomatic GJH, people in earlier life phases tended to report less anxiety. Pain complaints were highly frequent in populations with symptomatic GJH. Increased levels of anxiety seemed to be related to higher levels of hypermobility. The highest levels of anxiety were found in individuals with symptomatic GJH followed by those with asymptomatic GJH, who showed slightly increased (but not significant) different levels of anxiety than their peers without GJH.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Anxiety may be related to the different stages of the spectrum of GJH, in terms of severity. This review supports the need to screen for anxiety in individuals with GJH in all life phases independent of their complaints.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"7 4","pages":"Article 100467"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145739017","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Feasibility of a Preoperative Exercise and Nutritional Intervention in Sarcopenic Obese Individuals Undergoing Hip or Knee Arthroplasty: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial 髋关节或膝关节置换术中肌肉减少肥胖患者术前运动和营养干预的可行性:一项随机对照试验
IF 2 Q2 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100524
Ellen Oosting PhD , Mirjam Holverda , Jordi Elings PhD , Wouter van Helden MD , Marco Mensink PhD , Johannes Zwerver MD, PhD

Objective

To evaluate the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of a combined preoperative exercise and nutritional intervention in patients with sarcopenic obesity (SO) scheduled for total hip or knee arthroplasty.

Design

A pilot randomized controlled trial was conducted (May 2021 to December 2022).

Setting

A regional Dutch hospital.

Participants

Patients (N=40) with obesity before total hip arthroplasty or total knee arthroplasty (73% women, age 65±10y, body mass index, 34±3kg/m2). Recruitment achieved a 25% success rate among contacted patients.

Interventions

Exercise, a physiotherapist-supervised program of resistance and aerobic training twice weekly for 6 weeks, plus dietitian-guided nutritional advice to reach recommended protein intake within the habitual diet (n=21), compared with a control group receiving usual preoperative care and general dietary guidance (n=19)

Main outcome measures

The main outcome was feasibility and acceptability, based on recruitment, adherence, and participant feedback. Secondary outcomes included physical function, self-reported health, body composition, and inflammation markers.

Results

Of 40 randomized patients, 25 completed the intervention period, with many dropouts because of scheduling issues related to coronavirus disease 2019. Exercise adherence was 80%, and dietary adherence was high, with participants significantly increasing protein intake. The proportion of patients meeting the recommended protein intake (1.2g/kg) increased from 21% to 93% in the intervention group, whereas it remained at 18% in the control group. Intervention participants improved preoperative functional mobility, with the timed Up and Go test reduced by a clinically relevant difference of 2 seconds. Interviews indicated that participants continued the nutritional advice and exercise on their own initiative after surgery. Postoperative outcomes, measured by length of stay and self-reported physical functioning, were unchanged.

Conclusions

Despite recruitment challenges and dropouts, the intervention was feasible and well-received, with short-term functional improvements. The preoperative period offers a valuable window for lifestyle changes, though no postoperative differences were observed. Longer or more personalized interventions may further enhance outcomes.
目的评价肌肉减少型肥胖(SO)患者行全髋关节或膝关节置换术术前联合运动和营养干预的可行性和初步效果。设计一项随机对照试验(2021年5月至2022年12月)。荷兰一家地区医院。参与者:全髋关节置换术或全膝关节置换术前肥胖患者(N=40)(73%为女性,年龄65±10y,体重指数34±3kg/m2)。在接触的患者中,招募成功率达到25%。干预:运动,一个物理治疗师监督的抗阻和有氧训练计划,每周两次,持续6周,加上营养师指导的营养建议,在习惯饮食中达到推荐的蛋白质摄入量(n=21),与接受常规术前护理和一般饮食指导的对照组(n=19)相比。主要结果测量主要结果是可行性和可接受性,基于招募,坚持和参与者反馈。次要结局包括身体机能、自我报告的健康状况、身体成分和炎症标志物。结果在40名随机患者中,有25名完成了干预期,其中许多人因与2019冠状病毒病相关的日程安排问题而退出。运动坚持度为80%,饮食坚持度也很高,参与者显著增加了蛋白质摄入量。在干预组,达到推荐蛋白质摄入量(1.2g/kg)的患者比例从21%增加到93%,而在对照组,这一比例仍为18%。干预参与者改善了术前功能活动能力,Up and Go测试的时间缩短了2秒的临床相关差异。访谈显示,手术后,参与者继续主动接受营养建议和锻炼。通过住院时间和自我报告的身体功能来衡量的术后结果没有变化。结论尽管存在招募挑战和辍学率,但该干预措施是可行且受欢迎的,并能在短期内改善功能。术前为生活方式的改变提供了一个宝贵的窗口期,尽管术后没有观察到差异。更长时间或更个性化的干预可能会进一步提高结果。
{"title":"Feasibility of a Preoperative Exercise and Nutritional Intervention in Sarcopenic Obese Individuals Undergoing Hip or Knee Arthroplasty: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"Ellen Oosting PhD ,&nbsp;Mirjam Holverda ,&nbsp;Jordi Elings PhD ,&nbsp;Wouter van Helden MD ,&nbsp;Marco Mensink PhD ,&nbsp;Johannes Zwerver MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100524","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100524","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of a combined preoperative exercise and nutritional intervention in patients with sarcopenic obesity (SO) scheduled for total hip or knee arthroplasty.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A pilot randomized controlled trial was conducted (May 2021 to December 2022).</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>A regional Dutch hospital.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Patients (N=40) with obesity before total hip arthroplasty or total knee arthroplasty (73% women, age 65±10y, body mass index, 34±3kg/m<sup>2</sup>). Recruitment achieved a 25% success rate among contacted patients.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Exercise, a physiotherapist-supervised program of resistance and aerobic training twice weekly for 6 weeks, plus dietitian-guided nutritional advice to reach recommended protein intake within the habitual diet (n=21), compared with a control group receiving usual preoperative care and general dietary guidance (n=19)</div></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><div>The main outcome was feasibility and acceptability, based on recruitment, adherence, and participant feedback. Secondary outcomes included physical function, self-reported health, body composition, and inflammation markers.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 40 randomized patients, 25 completed the intervention period, with many dropouts because of scheduling issues related to coronavirus disease 2019. Exercise adherence was 80%, and dietary adherence was high, with participants significantly increasing protein intake. The proportion of patients meeting the recommended protein intake (1.2g/kg) increased from 21% to 93% in the intervention group, whereas it remained at 18% in the control group. Intervention participants improved preoperative functional mobility, with the timed Up and Go test reduced by a clinically relevant difference of 2 seconds. Interviews indicated that participants continued the nutritional advice and exercise on their own initiative after surgery. Postoperative outcomes, measured by length of stay and self-reported physical functioning, were unchanged.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Despite recruitment challenges and dropouts, the intervention was feasible and well-received, with short-term functional improvements. The preoperative period offers a valuable window for lifestyle changes, though no postoperative differences were observed. Longer or more personalized interventions may further enhance outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"7 4","pages":"Article 100524"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145739311","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Understanding Cannabis Use After Spinal Cord Injury: A Canadian Survey Study 了解脊髓损伤后大麻的使用:一项加拿大调查研究
IF 2 Q2 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100498
David J. Allison PhD , Sanam Ebrahimzadeh PhD , Alexandria Roa Agudelo cMLA/T , Arden Lawson BSc , Daad Kassem BSc , Eldon Loh MD

Objective

To describe the prevalence and characteristics of cannabis use among Canadians with spinal cord injury (SCI).

Design

Observational study.

Setting

Online survey.

Participants

Canadian adults with any level or severity of SCI (N=80). In total, 136 individuals were screened for participation, of which 80 (61.2% men; mean age: 57.7y) completed the survey.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Prevalence and frequency of cannabis use; reasons for and against use; perceived effectiveness; adverse events; and modality of cannabis consumption.

Results

Overall, 42.5% of participants reported cannabis use postinjury, and 37.5% were current users, exceeding the general Canadian population’s usage rate (25%). Postinjury, the primary reasons for cannabis use shifted from recreation (25%) to alleviating pain (36.3%) and improving sleep (30%), with users perceiving moderate effectiveness. Reported adverse events were generally mild and infrequent, with fatigue being the most common (11.3%). Edibles replaced smoking as the most common modality of cannabis consumption postinjury. No significant associations were found between cannabis use and demographic variables, including sex, education, or employment status.

Conclusions

This small survey highlights the prevalence and therapeutic motivations for cannabis use among Canadians with SCI, with a shift toward medicinal applications postinjury. With moderate perceived effectiveness and a low prevalence of only mild side effects, future research is warranted to evaluate cannabis’ efficacy and safety in this population and to address barriers to its use, including stigma and health concerns.
目的了解加拿大脊髓损伤患者的大麻使用情况及特点。DesignObservational研究。SettingOnline调查。参与者:任何程度或严重程度的加拿大成年人(N=80)。共有136人接受了筛查,其中80人(61.2%为男性,平均年龄57.7岁)完成了调查。InterventionsNot适用。大麻使用的有效性和频率;使用和反对使用的理由;感知的有效性;不良事件;以及吸食大麻的方式。结果总体而言,42.5%的参与者报告在受伤后使用大麻,37.5%的参与者目前使用大麻,超过了加拿大一般人群的使用率(25%)。受伤后,使用大麻的主要原因从娱乐(25%)转变为缓解疼痛(36.3%)和改善睡眠(30%),使用者认为效果中等。报告的不良事件通常轻微且不常见,疲劳是最常见的(11.3%)。食用大麻取代吸烟成为受伤后吸食大麻的最常见方式。大麻使用与人口统计学变量(包括性别、教育或就业状况)之间没有发现显著关联。这项小型调查突出了加拿大脊髓损伤患者使用大麻的患病率和治疗动机,并转向损伤后的医学应用。由于大麻的有效性一般,副作用的发生率较低,因此有必要进行进一步的研究,以评估大麻在这一人群中的有效性和安全性,并解决使用大麻的障碍,包括耻辱和健康问题。
{"title":"Understanding Cannabis Use After Spinal Cord Injury: A Canadian Survey Study","authors":"David J. Allison PhD ,&nbsp;Sanam Ebrahimzadeh PhD ,&nbsp;Alexandria Roa Agudelo cMLA/T ,&nbsp;Arden Lawson BSc ,&nbsp;Daad Kassem BSc ,&nbsp;Eldon Loh MD","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100498","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100498","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To describe the prevalence and characteristics of cannabis use among Canadians with spinal cord injury (SCI).</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Observational study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Online survey.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Canadian adults with any level or severity of SCI (N=80). In total, 136 individuals were screened for participation, of which 80 (61.2% men; mean age: 57.7y) completed the survey.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Not applicable.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Prevalence and frequency of cannabis use; reasons for and against use; perceived effectiveness; adverse events; and modality of cannabis consumption.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 42.5% of participants reported cannabis use postinjury, and 37.5% were current users, exceeding the general Canadian population’s usage rate (25%). Postinjury, the primary reasons for cannabis use shifted from recreation (25%) to alleviating pain (36.3%) and improving sleep (30%), with users perceiving moderate effectiveness. Reported adverse events were generally mild and infrequent, with fatigue being the most common (11.3%). Edibles replaced smoking as the most common modality of cannabis consumption postinjury. No significant associations were found between cannabis use and demographic variables, including sex, education, or employment status.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This small survey highlights the prevalence and therapeutic motivations for cannabis use among Canadians with SCI, with a shift toward medicinal applications postinjury. With moderate perceived effectiveness and a low prevalence of only mild side effects, future research is warranted to evaluate cannabis’ efficacy and safety in this population and to address barriers to its use, including stigma and health concerns.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"7 4","pages":"Article 100498"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145739024","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Barriers to Mobility in the ICU: Insights from Severe COVID-19 and Implications for Improving Patient Outcomes ICU的行动障碍:来自重症COVID-19的见解及其对改善患者预后的影响
IF 2 Q2 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100537
Irene Kalbian MD , Andrew Delgado PhD , Sofia Barchuk DO , Stacey Cohen MS , Adel Bassily-Marcus MD , Laura Tabacof MD , Lisa Spielman PhD , Kristen Dams-O’Connor PhD , Roopa Kohli-Seth MD , Neha Dangayach MD , Avniel Shetreat-Klein MD, PhD , Miguel X. Escalon MD, MPH

Objective

To evaluate mobility outcomes of patients with severe COVID-19 during their intensive care unit (ICU) stay compared to non-COVID-19 critically ill counterparts and assess factors impacting mobility status.

Design

A retrospective, single-center case–control study.

Setting

This investigation was conducted at a large tertiary care center at the epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic between April 2019 and July 2020 to capture a prepandemic baseline and the initial surge.

Participants

A total of 3275 ICU cases were analyzed. Analysis was conducted at the ICU visit level rather than the patient level. Eligible visits included adults ≥18 years. The COVID-19 cohort (COVID vs non-COVID) was defined by confirmed infection (polymerase chain reaction or equivalent testing). ICU visits with missing data were excluded and subsequently matched via coarsened exact matching.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Primary outcome measure was an ICU visit’s highest ICU mobility status (Immobile, Nonambulatory, Ambulatory) at any time during their stay. Secondary outcomes included age, sex, body mass index, APACHE-III score, Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale, patient expired, tracheostomy status, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy status, hospital length of stay, prone status, and physical therapy status.

Results

The COVID visits were overwhelmingly categorized as immobile, whereas non-COVID visits were more likely to be ambulatory. Multinomial regression showed that COVID patients were 60% less likely to be Nonambulatory and 93% less likely to be Ambulatory versus immobile. COVID-19 visits were also associated with higher final APACHE-III scores (P=.001), longer hospital stays (P<.001), increased sedation (P<.001), fewer ICU physical therapy visits (P=.001), and more frequent proning (P<.001) compared to non-COVID visits.

Conclusions

Severe COVID-19 significantly affects ICU mobility, with COVID visits experiencing reduced mobility compared to non-COVID visits. These findings underscore the urgent need for innovative sedation protocols and ICU mobilization strategies to mitigate risks of ICU-acquired weakness, postintensive care syndrome, and other long-term disabilities. Addressing these challenges is critical to improving outcomes for all ICU patients facing barriers to traditional mobilization strategies and preparing for future pandemics.
目的比较重症COVID-19患者与非重症患者在重症监护病房(ICU)住院期间的活动情况,并评估影响活动状况的因素。设计一项回顾性、单中心病例对照研究。这项调查是在2019年4月至2020年7月期间在COVID-19大流行中心的一个大型三级医疗中心进行的,以获取大流行前的基线和最初的激增。共分析3275例ICU病例。分析是在ICU就诊水平而不是患者水平进行的。符合条件的患者包括≥18岁的成年人。COVID-19队列(COVID与非COVID)通过确诊感染(聚合酶链反应或等效检测)来定义。排除数据缺失的ICU就诊,随后通过粗精确匹配进行匹配。InterventionsNot适用。主要结局指标主要结局指标是患者在住院期间任何时间的最高ICU活动状态(不活动、非活动、活动)。次要结局包括年龄、性别、体重指数、APACHE-III评分、Richmond躁动镇静量表、患者死亡、气管造口术状态、经皮内镜胃造口术状态、住院时间、俯卧状态和物理治疗状态。结果冠状病毒感染患者绝大多数被归类为无法移动的,而非冠状病毒感染患者更有可能是动态的。多项回归显示,与不活动相比,COVID患者非活动的可能性降低了60%,活动的可能性降低了93%。与非COVID-19就诊相比,COVID-19就诊还与更高的最终APACHE-III评分(P=.001)、更长的住院时间(P=.001)、更多的镇静(P=.001)、更少的ICU物理治疗就诊(P=.001)和更频繁的倾向(P=.001)相关。结论重症COVID-19显著影响ICU的流动性,与未感染COVID-19的患者相比,感染COVID-19的患者就诊时流动性降低。这些发现强调了创新镇静方案和ICU动员策略的迫切需要,以减轻ICU获得性虚弱、重症监护后综合征和其他长期残疾的风险。解决这些挑战对于改善所有ICU患者的预后至关重要,这些患者面临传统动员战略的障碍,并为未来的大流行做好准备。
{"title":"Barriers to Mobility in the ICU: Insights from Severe COVID-19 and Implications for Improving Patient Outcomes","authors":"Irene Kalbian MD ,&nbsp;Andrew Delgado PhD ,&nbsp;Sofia Barchuk DO ,&nbsp;Stacey Cohen MS ,&nbsp;Adel Bassily-Marcus MD ,&nbsp;Laura Tabacof MD ,&nbsp;Lisa Spielman PhD ,&nbsp;Kristen Dams-O’Connor PhD ,&nbsp;Roopa Kohli-Seth MD ,&nbsp;Neha Dangayach MD ,&nbsp;Avniel Shetreat-Klein MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Miguel X. Escalon MD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100537","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100537","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate mobility outcomes of patients with severe COVID-19 during their intensive care unit (ICU) stay compared to non-COVID-19 critically ill counterparts and assess factors impacting mobility status.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A retrospective, single-center case–control study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>This investigation was conducted at a large tertiary care center at the epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic between April 2019 and July 2020 to capture a prepandemic baseline and the initial surge.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>A total of 3275 ICU cases were analyzed. Analysis was conducted at the ICU visit level rather than the patient level. Eligible visits included adults ≥18 years. The COVID-19 cohort (COVID vs non-COVID) was defined by confirmed infection (polymerase chain reaction or equivalent testing). ICU visits with missing data were excluded and subsequently matched via coarsened exact matching.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Not applicable.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Primary outcome measure was an ICU visit’s highest ICU mobility status (Immobile, Nonambulatory, Ambulatory) at any time during their stay. Secondary outcomes included age, sex, body mass index, APACHE-III score, Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale, patient expired, tracheostomy status, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy status, hospital length of stay, prone status, and physical therapy status.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The COVID visits were overwhelmingly categorized as immobile, whereas non-COVID visits were more likely to be ambulatory. Multinomial regression showed that COVID patients were 60% less likely to be Nonambulatory and 93% less likely to be Ambulatory versus immobile. COVID-19 visits were also associated with higher final APACHE-III scores (<em>P</em>=.001), longer hospital stays (<em>P</em>&lt;.001), increased sedation (<em>P</em>&lt;.001), fewer ICU physical therapy visits (<em>P</em>=.001), and more frequent proning (<em>P</em>&lt;.001) compared to non-COVID visits.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Severe COVID-19 significantly affects ICU mobility, with COVID visits experiencing reduced mobility compared to non-COVID visits. These findings underscore the urgent need for innovative sedation protocols and ICU mobilization strategies to mitigate risks of ICU-acquired weakness, postintensive care syndrome, and other long-term disabilities. Addressing these challenges is critical to improving outcomes for all ICU patients facing barriers to traditional mobilization strategies and preparing for future pandemics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"7 4","pages":"Article 100537"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145739122","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1