首页 > 最新文献

Burns open : an international open access journal for burn injuries最新文献

英文 中文
Acute phase optimization in burn care: Online tools and comprehensive predictive models for adult and pediatric patients 烧伤护理的急性期优化:针对成人和儿童患者的在线工具和综合预测模型
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.burnso.2024.100370
Enrico Cocchi , Fortunato Cassalia , Stefano Palo , Carmine D’Acunto , Anna Belloni Fortina , Marcello Stella , Davide Melandri

Background

Severe burn injuries significantly challenge acute medical care, particularly in resource-limited environments. Current predictive scoring systems, often impractical and adult-focused, neglect crucial aspects like mechanical ventilation and length of hospital stay (LOS).

Methods

This study analyzed 2,618 severe burn patients, developing new predictive models for survival, mechanical ventilation, and LOS, based on promptly accessible factors applicable in any setting.

Results

We observed significant seasonality and clear age- and gender-specific patterns, highlighting the necessity for targeted interventions. We developed and publicly released new predictive models for mortality, mechanical ventilation, and LOS for both adult and pediatric populations.

Discussion

Targeting deficiencies in existing scoring systems, this study potentially advances acute burn management, with a particular focus on resource-limited settings. It provides crucial insights into the epidemiology, etiology, and prognostic factors of severe burn injuries, encapsulated in 10 actionable points. We also present an innovative freely accessible online assessment tool: https://burn-scores.com.

Conclusion

By bridging gaps in current scoring methodologies and improving acute phase management, our research offers insights to improve clinical outcomes for severe burn patients globally. The integration of tailored predictive models and technology-driven solutions, especially relevant in resource-constrained settings, represents a major stride in enhancing the quality of burn care.

背景严重烧伤给急诊医疗带来了巨大挑战,尤其是在资源有限的环境中。目前的预测评分系统往往不切实际,而且以成人为重点,忽视了机械通气和住院时间(LOS)等关键方面。方法本研究分析了 2,618 名严重烧伤患者,根据适用于任何环境的可迅速获取的因素,开发了新的存活率、机械通气和住院时间预测模型。结果我们观察到显著的季节性以及明显的年龄和性别特异性模式,突出了有针对性干预的必要性。我们为成人和儿童人群开发并公开发布了新的死亡率、机械通气和持续时间预测模型。讨论针对现有评分系统的不足,这项研究可能会促进急性烧伤的管理,尤其是在资源有限的环境中。它提供了关于严重烧伤的流行病学、病因学和预后因素的重要见解,概括为 10 个可操作的要点。我们还介绍了一种可免费访问的创新型在线评估工具:https://burn-scores.com.ConclusionBy 弥补了当前评分方法的不足,改善了急性期管理,我们的研究为改善全球严重烧伤患者的临床预后提供了真知灼见。整合量身定制的预测模型和技术驱动型解决方案(尤其适用于资源有限的环境)是提高烧伤护理质量的一大进步。
{"title":"Acute phase optimization in burn care: Online tools and comprehensive predictive models for adult and pediatric patients","authors":"Enrico Cocchi ,&nbsp;Fortunato Cassalia ,&nbsp;Stefano Palo ,&nbsp;Carmine D’Acunto ,&nbsp;Anna Belloni Fortina ,&nbsp;Marcello Stella ,&nbsp;Davide Melandri","doi":"10.1016/j.burnso.2024.100370","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.burnso.2024.100370","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Severe burn injuries significantly challenge acute medical care, particularly in resource-limited environments. Current predictive scoring systems, often impractical and adult-focused, neglect crucial aspects like mechanical ventilation and length of hospital stay (LOS).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study analyzed 2,618 severe burn patients, developing new predictive models for survival, mechanical ventilation, and LOS, based on promptly accessible factors applicable in any setting.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We observed significant seasonality and clear age- and gender-specific patterns, highlighting the necessity for targeted interventions. We developed and publicly released new predictive models for mortality, mechanical ventilation, and LOS for both adult and pediatric populations.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Targeting deficiencies in existing scoring systems, this study potentially advances acute burn management, with a particular focus on resource-limited settings. It provides crucial insights into the epidemiology, etiology, and prognostic factors of severe burn injuries, encapsulated in 10 actionable points. We also present an innovative freely accessible online assessment tool: <span><span>https://burn-scores.com</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>By bridging gaps in current scoring methodologies and improving acute phase management, our research offers insights to improve clinical outcomes for severe burn patients globally. The integration of tailored predictive models and technology-driven solutions, especially relevant in resource-constrained settings, represents a major stride in enhancing the quality of burn care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72486,"journal":{"name":"Burns open : an international open access journal for burn injuries","volume":"8 4","pages":"Article 100370"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468912224000580/pdfft?md5=8b83bbbd38e3e53955f98e0644dbc33c&pid=1-s2.0-S2468912224000580-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141993277","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Associated bacterial and fungal infections in burn wounds: Common factors, distribution in etiology, age groups, bacterial and fungal strands – Evaluation of a single burn center experience of 20 years 烧伤创面伴发的细菌和真菌感染:常见因素、病因分布、年龄组、细菌和真菌链 - 对一家烧伤中心 20 年经验的评估
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.burnso.2024.100363
Christian Weinand

Introduction

Burn intensive care unit (BICU) patients suffer from reduced immunological competence. Often bacterial and fungal infections occur as single or associated infection of the burn site. However, common factors in associated infections are discussed controversially. In this study we evaluated factors common in associated occurrence of bacterial and fungal infection in the burn population.

Patients and methods

In total 213 patients, admitted to the ICU of Cologne Merheim Clinical Center between 1988 and 2011, with associated infections were included in this study. Exclusion criteria were no bacterial, or no fungal infection, or incomplete data. Data evaluated were sex, age, type of burn injury, total body surface area (TBSA), abbreviated burn severity index (ABSI) score, 3rd degree burn, inhalation injury, length of BICU stay, antibiotic therapy, bacterial strand, fungal strand, incidence of bacteria and fungus infection, single or associated occurrence and bacteria species associated with fungus species. Statistical analysis comprised of univariate, Chi-square and Fischer Exact test, multivariate analysis, positive and negative predictive value, logistic regression analysis with the Nagelkerke, Cox/ Snell R-square.

Results

196 patients were included into the study, 147 male and 49 female. Total mean age was 47 years, in the fire burn group 47 years, in scalding 53 years, in electrical burn 29 years and in chemical burn 62 years. 123 male and 45 female were combusted, 15 male and 3 female scalded, 9 male had an electrical burn and 1 female a chemical burn. The mean TBSA in fire burns was 41 %, in scalding 42 %, in electrical burns 46 %, and in chemical burn 16 %. The mean ABSI in fire burn and scalding was 9, in electrical burn 8 and in chemical burn 7. The 3rd degree burns were 16 % in fire burn and 13 % in scalding and electrical burn and 0 % in chemical burn. The length of BICU stay was 49 days for fire burn, 47 days for scalding, 58 days in electrical burn and 21 days in chemical burn patients.

The gram-positive bacterial strands most often found were Staphylococcus strands, gram negative Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter strands. Candida albicans was the most often present fungal strand. There was no difference in incidence between gram positive and gram-negative bacteria. In patients suffering from fire burns the most common bacteria were Staphylococcus and Pseudomonas, in scalding Acinetobacter, and in chemical burns Staphylococcus. In electrical burns no predominant bacterial strand was found. The associated occurrence of Staphylococcus and Candida albicans and Pseudomonas and Candida albicans was predominant. In patients with fire burn, 48% showed an associated infection, in scalding 21%, in electrical burn 33% and in chemical burn 100%.

Combusted patients had the highest incidence of associated infection in age group 80–89 years, in scalding 40–49, 50–59 a

导言烧伤重症监护室(BICU)患者的免疫能力下降。细菌和真菌感染通常是烧伤部位的单一感染或伴发感染。然而,关于伴发感染的常见因素却存在争议。在这项研究中,我们评估了烧伤人群中细菌和真菌感染相关发生的常见因素。患者和方法在 1988 年至 2011 年期间,科隆梅尔海姆临床中心重症监护室共收治了 213 名伴有感染的患者。排除标准为无细菌或真菌感染,或数据不完整。评估的数据包括性别、年龄、烧伤类型、体表总面积(TBSA)、烧伤严重程度指数(ABSI)评分、三度烧伤、吸入性损伤、BICU住院时间、抗生素治疗、细菌链、真菌链、细菌和真菌感染的发生率、单一或伴发感染以及与真菌感染相关的细菌种类。统计分析包括单变量分析、Chi-square 和 Fischer Exact 检验、多变量分析、阳性和阴性预测值、用 Nagelkerke、Cox/ Snell R-square 进行的逻辑回归分析。总平均年龄为 47 岁,其中火烧伤 47 岁,烫伤 53 岁,电烧伤 29 岁,化学烧伤 62 岁。燃烧组中,男性 123 人,女性 45 人;烫伤组中,男性 15 人,女性 3 人;电烧伤组中,男性 9 人,女性 1 人。火烧伤的平均总面积为 41%,烫伤的平均总面积为 42%,电烧伤的平均总面积为 46%,化学烧伤的平均总面积为 16%。火烧伤和烫伤的平均 ABSI 为 9,电烧伤为 8,化学烧伤为 7。三度烧伤中,火烧伤占 16%,烫伤和电烧伤占 13%,化学烧伤占 0%。火灾烧伤患者在 BICU 的住院时间为 49 天,烫伤患者为 47 天,电烧伤患者为 58 天,化学烧伤患者为 21 天。白色念珠菌是最常出现的真菌菌群。革兰氏阳性菌和革兰氏阴性菌的发病率没有差异。在火烧伤患者中,最常见的细菌是葡萄球菌和假单胞菌;在烫伤患者中,最常见的细菌是不动杆菌;在化学烧伤患者中,最常见的细菌是葡萄球菌。在电烧伤中没有发现主要的细菌群。葡萄球菌和白色念珠菌、假单胞菌和白色念珠菌是主要的相关菌群。在火烧伤患者中,48%的患者伴有感染,在烫伤患者中为 21%,在电烧伤患者中为 33%,在化学烧伤患者中为 100%。火烧伤患者中 80-89 岁年龄组伴有感染的发生率最高,烫伤患者中 40-49、50-59 和 70-79 岁年龄组伴有感染的发生率最高,电烧伤患者中 20-29 岁年龄组伴有感染的发生率最高,化学烧伤患者中 60-69 岁年龄组伴有感染的发生率最高。伴发感染的最常见因素是高龄、三度烧伤的高总热辐射面积和细菌感染。结论烧伤患者伴发细菌和真菌伤口感染率最高的是葡萄球菌或假单胞菌感染,主要发生在火灾烧伤和电烧伤中。在吸入性损伤中使用氧气可预防相关的细菌和真菌感染。
{"title":"Associated bacterial and fungal infections in burn wounds: Common factors, distribution in etiology, age groups, bacterial and fungal strands – Evaluation of a single burn center experience of 20 years","authors":"Christian Weinand","doi":"10.1016/j.burnso.2024.100363","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.burnso.2024.100363","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Burn intensive care unit (BICU) patients suffer from reduced immunological competence. Often bacterial and fungal infections occur as single or associated infection of the burn site. However, common factors in associated infections are discussed controversially. In this study we evaluated factors common in associated occurrence of bacterial and fungal infection in the burn population.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>In total 213 patients, admitted to the ICU of Cologne Merheim Clinical Center between 1988 and 2011, with associated infections were included in this study. Exclusion criteria were no bacterial, or no fungal infection, or incomplete data. Data evaluated were sex, age, type of burn injury, total body surface area (TBSA), abbreviated burn severity index (ABSI) score, 3rd degree burn, inhalation injury, length of BICU stay, antibiotic therapy, bacterial strand, fungal strand, incidence of bacteria and fungus infection, single or associated occurrence and bacteria species associated with fungus species. Statistical analysis comprised of univariate, Chi-square and Fischer Exact test, multivariate analysis, positive and negative predictive value, logistic regression analysis with the Nagelkerke, Cox/ Snell R-square.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>196 patients were included into the study, 147 male and 49 female. Total mean age was 47 years, in the fire burn group 47 years, in scalding 53 years, in electrical burn 29 years and in chemical burn 62 years. 123 male and 45 female were combusted, 15 male and 3 female scalded, 9 male had an electrical burn and 1 female a chemical burn. The mean TBSA in fire burns was 41 %, in scalding 42 %, in electrical burns 46 %, and in chemical burn 16 %. The mean ABSI in fire burn and scalding was 9, in electrical burn 8 and in chemical burn 7. The 3rd degree burns were 16 % in fire burn and 13 % in scalding and electrical burn and 0 % in chemical burn. The length of BICU stay was 49 days for fire burn, 47 days for scalding, 58 days in electrical burn and 21 days in chemical burn patients.</p><p>The gram-positive bacterial strands most often found were Staphylococcus strands, gram negative Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter strands. Candida albicans was the most often present fungal strand. There was no difference in incidence between gram positive and gram-negative bacteria. In patients suffering from fire burns the most common bacteria were Staphylococcus and Pseudomonas, in scalding Acinetobacter, and in chemical burns Staphylococcus. In electrical burns no predominant bacterial strand was found. The associated occurrence of Staphylococcus and Candida albicans and Pseudomonas and Candida albicans was predominant. In patients with fire burn, 48% showed an associated infection, in scalding 21%, in electrical burn 33% and in chemical burn 100%.</p><p>Combusted patients had the highest incidence of associated infection in age group 80–89 years, in scalding 40–49, 50–59 a","PeriodicalId":72486,"journal":{"name":"Burns open : an international open access journal for burn injuries","volume":"8 4","pages":"Article 100363"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468912224000518/pdfft?md5=96e6815fb038ba2f47e1b776c261c1e0&pid=1-s2.0-S2468912224000518-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142021436","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Corrigendum to “Evaluation of clinical presentation and management outcome of burns, experience at secondary referral hospital in a low-income, sub-Saharan country: A cohort study” [Burns Open 8(2) (2024) 82–86] 撒哈拉以南低收入国家二级转诊医院烧伤临床表现和处理结果评估:一项队列研究" [Burns Open 8(2) (2024) 82-86] 的更正
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.burnso.2024.100369
Mohammedbabalrahma Bashier Ahmed Koko , Mohamed Daffalla Awadalla Gismalla , Mohammed Yousof Bakhiet , Alshareef Mohamed Alshareef , Mohammed Aseri , Aimen Elsheikh Khalil Abuelnour
{"title":"Corrigendum to “Evaluation of clinical presentation and management outcome of burns, experience at secondary referral hospital in a low-income, sub-Saharan country: A cohort study” [Burns Open 8(2) (2024) 82–86]","authors":"Mohammedbabalrahma Bashier Ahmed Koko ,&nbsp;Mohamed Daffalla Awadalla Gismalla ,&nbsp;Mohammed Yousof Bakhiet ,&nbsp;Alshareef Mohamed Alshareef ,&nbsp;Mohammed Aseri ,&nbsp;Aimen Elsheikh Khalil Abuelnour","doi":"10.1016/j.burnso.2024.100369","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.burnso.2024.100369","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":72486,"journal":{"name":"Burns open : an international open access journal for burn injuries","volume":"8 4","pages":"Article 100369"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468912224000579/pdfft?md5=a8d67f4a712fbe220b12b2ae75fa8629&pid=1-s2.0-S2468912224000579-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141978925","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Adapted approaches to initial fluid management of patients with major burns in resource-limited settings: A systematic review 在资源有限的环境中对重度烧伤患者进行初始输液管理的适应性方法:系统回顾
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.burnso.2024.100365
Kai Hsun Hsiao , Joseph Kalanzi , Stuart B Watson , Srinivas Murthy , Ani Movsisyan , Kavita Kothari , Flavio Salio , Pryanka Relan

Background

Resource limitations in settings such as burn mass casualty incidents (MCIs) present challenges to the judicious fluid resuscitation required for major burns. Previous recommendations for burns care in MCIs have suggested certain adaptations from routine care, such as delaying intravenous (IV) fluid resuscitation until arrival at facility; using a fluid calculation formula that is independent of percentage of total body surface area (%TBSA) burned; or using fluid calculation formula based on time of arrival to first receiving facility rather than from time of injury, thus omitting ‘catch-up’ fluid.

Objectives

To synthesize and assess certainty of evidence from resource-limited settings on the three adaptations to fluid resuscitation for patients with major burns in MCIs.

Methods

PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library were searched on 8 September 2023 with an update search on 8 July 2024. Primary quantitative studies in resource-limited settings meeting eligibility criteria as assessed by two reviewers were included. Where available, outcome effects for these adaptations compared to routine burns care were calculated. Evidence certainty was determined by GRADE.

Results

Two eligible studies were identified from 544 search results. One study with 48 participants provided very uncertain evidence that delayed IV fluid resuscitation may increase acute kidney injury compared to prehospital resuscitation (OR 2.48, 95% CI 0.58–10.62). The other study with a cohort of 10 children provided very uncertain evidence that calculating fluid requirements based on time of arrival to first receiving facility, i.e. omitting ‘catch-up’ fluids, may maintain adequate urine output and be associated with no complications of fluid over- or under-resuscitation. There were no studies on use of a simplified %TBSA-independent fluid calculation formula.

Conclusions

There is very limited and uncertain evidence to inform on delayed IV fluid resuscitation, simplified %TBSA-independent formula, and omission of ‘catch up’ fluids for burns care in MCIs. Contextual factors, local values, preferences and feasibility also need to be considered.

背景烧伤大面积伤亡事件(MCIs)等环境中的资源限制给重大烧伤所需的合理液体复苏带来了挑战。以往针对 MCI 中烧伤护理的建议提出了一些与常规护理不同的调整措施,例如将静脉注射液(IV)复苏延迟到到达医疗机构之后;使用与烧伤总体表面积(%TBSA)百分比无关的液体计算公式;或使用基于到达第一接收机构时间而非受伤时间的液体计算公式,从而省略 "补液"。方法于 2023 年 9 月 8 日检索了 PubMed、EMBASE、CINAHL 和 Cochrane 图书馆,并于 2024 年 7 月 8 日进行了更新检索。经两名审稿人评估,符合资格标准的资源有限环境中的主要定量研究均被纳入。在可用的情况下,计算了这些适应性治疗与常规烧伤护理相比的结果效果。结果从 544 项搜索结果中确定了两项符合条件的研究。其中一项有 48 人参与的研究提供了非常不确定的证据,即与院前复苏相比,延迟静脉输液复苏可能会增加急性肾损伤(OR 2.48,95% CI 0.58-10.62)。另一项由 10 名儿童组成的研究提供了非常不确定的证据,即根据到达第一家接收机构的时间计算液体需求量,即省略 "补液 "液体,可以保持足够的尿量,并且不会出现液体复苏过度或不足的并发症。结论在 MCIs 烧伤护理中,关于延迟静脉输液复苏、简化的与 TBSA 无关的百分比计算公式以及省略 "补液 "的证据非常有限且不确定。此外,还需要考虑环境因素、当地价值观、偏好和可行性。
{"title":"Adapted approaches to initial fluid management of patients with major burns in resource-limited settings: A systematic review","authors":"Kai Hsun Hsiao ,&nbsp;Joseph Kalanzi ,&nbsp;Stuart B Watson ,&nbsp;Srinivas Murthy ,&nbsp;Ani Movsisyan ,&nbsp;Kavita Kothari ,&nbsp;Flavio Salio ,&nbsp;Pryanka Relan","doi":"10.1016/j.burnso.2024.100365","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.burnso.2024.100365","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Resource limitations in settings such as burn mass casualty incidents (MCIs) present challenges to the judicious fluid resuscitation required for major burns. Previous recommendations for burns care in MCIs have suggested certain adaptations from routine care, such as delaying intravenous (IV) fluid resuscitation until arrival at facility; using a fluid calculation formula that is independent of percentage of total body surface area (%TBSA) burned; or using fluid calculation formula based on time of arrival to first receiving facility rather than from time of injury, thus omitting ‘catch-up’ fluid.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To synthesize and assess certainty of evidence from resource-limited settings on the three adaptations to fluid resuscitation for patients with major burns in MCIs.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library were searched on 8 September 2023 with an update search on 8 July 2024. Primary quantitative studies in resource-limited settings meeting eligibility criteria as assessed by two reviewers were included. Where available, outcome effects for these adaptations compared to routine burns care were calculated. Evidence certainty was determined by GRADE.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Two eligible studies were identified from 544 search results. One study with 48 participants provided very uncertain evidence that delayed IV fluid resuscitation may increase acute kidney injury compared to prehospital resuscitation (OR 2.48, 95% CI 0.58–10.62). The other study with a cohort of 10 children provided very uncertain evidence that calculating fluid requirements based on time of arrival to first receiving facility, i.e. omitting ‘catch-up’ fluids, may maintain adequate urine output and be associated with no complications of fluid over- or under-resuscitation. There were no studies on use of a simplified %TBSA-independent fluid calculation formula.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There is very limited and uncertain evidence to inform on delayed IV fluid resuscitation, simplified %TBSA-independent formula, and omission of ‘catch up’ fluids for burns care in MCIs. Contextual factors, local values, preferences and feasibility also need to be considered.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72486,"journal":{"name":"Burns open : an international open access journal for burn injuries","volume":"8 4","pages":"Article 100365"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468912224000531/pdfft?md5=503b28a1d46468b83036d3c4961eb5b4&pid=1-s2.0-S2468912224000531-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141843090","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Oral/enteral fluid resuscitation in the initial management of major burns: A systematic review and meta-analysis of human and animal studies 重度烧伤初期处理中的口服/肠液复苏:人类和动物研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.burnso.2024.100364
Kai Hsun Hsiao , Joseph Kalanzi , Stuart B. Watson , Srinivas Murthy , Ani Movsisyan , Kavita Kothari , Flavio Salio , Pryanka Relan

Background

Timely and safe intravenous (IV) fluid resuscitation for major burns may be difficult or impossible during mass casualty burn incidents. Oral/enteral fluid resuscitation may be an alternative.

Objectives

To synthesize and assess certainty of evidence on oral/enteral fluid resuscitation as compared to IV or no fluid resuscitation for major burns.

Methods

PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library were searched on 8 September 2023. Primary quantitative studies meeting criteria as assessed by two reviewers were included. Meta-analyses for outcome effects of oral/enteral versus IV and of oral/enteral versus no fluid resuscitation were conducted. Evidence certainty was assessed using GRADE.

Results

Seven human and eight animal studies were included. Three human RCTs totalling 100 participants contributed to estimates. Compared to IV fluid resuscitation, oral/enteral fluid resuscitation is associated with a statistically insignificant increased risk of mortality (OR 1.33, 95% CI 0.33–5.36) but the evidence is very uncertain, and no difference in urine output (SMD −0.17, 95% CI −0.65–0.31) with moderate certainty of evidence. Eight controlled animal studies totalling 212 participants contributed to estimates. From these animal studies, enteral fluid resuscitation may increase mortality (OR 36.00, 95% CI 2.72–476.28), worsen creatinine levels (MD 22 mmol/L, 95% CI 15.8–28.2), and increase urine output (MD 1 ml/kg/h, 95% CI 0.55–1.45) compared to IV, but all with very low certainty of evidence. Again, from animal studies, all the evidence is very uncertain, but compared to no fluid resuscitation, enteral resuscitation is associated with a statistically insignificant reduction in mortality (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.08–1.09), improved creatinine levels (SMD −3.48, 95% CI −4.69 to −2.28), and increased urine output (MD 0.55 ml/kg/h, 95% CI 0.38–0.72).

Conclusions

Current evidence comparing oral/enteral and IV fluid resuscitation for major burns is limited and uncertain. However, where IV fluid resuscitation is unavailable or delayed, oral fluid resuscitation could be considered.

背景在大规模伤亡烧伤事件中,对重度烧伤进行及时、安全的静脉注射(IV)液体复苏可能很困难或不可能。目的 综合并评估口服/肠道液体复苏与静脉注射或不进行液体复苏治疗重度烧伤的证据确定性。方法 于 2023 年 9 月 8 日检索了 PubMed、EMBASE、CINAHL 和 Cochrane 图书馆。纳入了经两名审稿人评估符合标准的主要定量研究。对口服/肠道与静脉注射以及口服/肠道与无液体复苏的结果效应进行了 Meta 分析。采用 GRADE 对证据的确定性进行了评估。三项人类 RCT 共 100 名参与者参与了估算。与静脉输液复苏相比,口服/肠道输液复苏与死亡率风险增加(OR 1.33,95% CI 0.33-5.36)相关,但在统计学上并不显著,但证据非常不确定,而尿量无差异(SMD -0.17,95% CI -0.65-0.31),证据的确定性为中等。八项动物对照研究共 212 名参与者参与了估算。从这些动物研究来看,与静脉注射相比,肠内液体复苏可能会增加死亡率(OR 36.00,95% CI 2.72-476.28)、恶化肌酐水平(MD 22 mmol/L,95% CI 15.8-28.2)和增加尿量(MD 1 ml/kg/h,95% CI 0.55-1.45),但证据的确定性都很低。同样,在动物实验中,所有的证据都很不确定,但与不进行液体复苏相比,肠内复苏与死亡率的降低(OR 0.29,95% CI 0.08-1.结论目前比较口服/肠道和静脉输液复苏治疗重度烧伤的证据有限且不确定。然而,在无法使用静脉输液或静脉输液延迟的情况下,可以考虑口服液复苏。
{"title":"Oral/enteral fluid resuscitation in the initial management of major burns: A systematic review and meta-analysis of human and animal studies","authors":"Kai Hsun Hsiao ,&nbsp;Joseph Kalanzi ,&nbsp;Stuart B. Watson ,&nbsp;Srinivas Murthy ,&nbsp;Ani Movsisyan ,&nbsp;Kavita Kothari ,&nbsp;Flavio Salio ,&nbsp;Pryanka Relan","doi":"10.1016/j.burnso.2024.100364","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.burnso.2024.100364","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Timely and safe intravenous (IV) fluid resuscitation for major burns may be difficult or impossible during mass casualty burn incidents. Oral/enteral fluid resuscitation may be an alternative.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To synthesize and assess certainty of evidence on oral/enteral fluid resuscitation as compared to IV or no fluid resuscitation for major burns.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library were searched on 8 September 2023. Primary quantitative studies meeting criteria as assessed by two reviewers were included. Meta-analyses for outcome effects of oral/enteral versus IV and of oral/enteral versus no fluid resuscitation were conducted. Evidence certainty was assessed using GRADE.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Seven human and eight animal studies were included. Three human RCTs totalling 100 participants contributed to estimates. Compared to IV fluid resuscitation, oral/enteral fluid resuscitation is associated with a statistically insignificant increased risk of mortality (OR 1.33, 95% CI 0.33–5.36) but the evidence is very uncertain, and no difference in urine output (SMD −0.17, 95% CI −0.65–0.31) with moderate certainty of evidence. Eight controlled animal studies totalling 212 participants contributed to estimates. From these animal studies, enteral fluid resuscitation may increase mortality (OR 36.00, 95% CI 2.72–476.28), worsen creatinine levels (MD 22 mmol/L, 95% CI 15.8–28.2), and increase urine output (MD 1 ml/kg/h, 95% CI 0.55–1.45) compared to IV, but all with very low certainty of evidence. Again, from animal studies, all the evidence is very uncertain, but compared to no fluid resuscitation, enteral resuscitation is associated with a statistically insignificant reduction in mortality (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.08–1.09), improved creatinine levels (SMD −3.48, 95% CI −4.69 to −2.28), and increased urine output (MD 0.55 ml/kg/h, 95% CI 0.38–0.72).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Current evidence comparing oral/enteral and IV fluid resuscitation for major burns is limited and uncertain. However, where IV fluid resuscitation is unavailable or delayed, oral fluid resuscitation could be considered.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72486,"journal":{"name":"Burns open : an international open access journal for burn injuries","volume":"8 4","pages":"Article 100364"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S246891222400052X/pdfft?md5=cb9faeea0777563e90825b3d5295256d&pid=1-s2.0-S246891222400052X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141849379","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Burn vs. Referral Physicians' TBSA Estimation Errors: A Cross-Sectional Study at the National Burn Center 比较烧伤科医生和转诊医生对烧伤面积的估计误差:对转诊至墨西哥城国家烧伤中心的 78 名患者进行的临床研究
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.burnso.2024.100361
Alejandro Angel Corona-Figueroa , Mario Vélez-Palafox , Erik Agustin Marquez-Gutierrez , Erika Barlandas-Quintana , Samuel Eloy Gutierrez-Barreto

Background

The percentage of the total body surface area (TBSA) is a simplified way to address the magnitude and severity of a thermal injury. The burn care providers recognize the relationship between burn size, prognosis, and number of required interventions. This study aims to identify the prevalence and magnitude of TBSA estimation inconsistencies between referring hospitals and the National Burn Center in Mexico and introduce new telemedicine and mobile applications for effectively estimating burn areas for non-burn-trained personnel.

Methods

We included patients with any thermal injury at the National Rehabilitation Institute in Mexico City referred from any other hospital in the country. Data was collected from the referral email and our medical records, and the burn estimation error was calculated using the following formula: (TBSA referral Hospital – TBSA Burn Center) / TBSA Burn Center multiplied by 100.

Results

Seventy-eight patients were transferred to the institute; the mean age was 27 years, 55 were male. The mean %TBSA from the referring hospital was 36 %, and in our Burn Center was 28 %, with a mean difference of 8.8 %. There were 59 cases with overestimated %TBSA, and ten were underestimated; the rest were similar in percentage.

Conclusions

Our study highlights substantial discrepancies between the estimated %TBSA by referring hospitals and the actual %TBSA, consistently tending towards overestimation.

背景总体表面积(TBSA)的百分比是处理热损伤程度和严重性的一种简化方法。烧伤护理人员认识到烧伤面积、预后和所需干预次数之间的关系。本研究旨在确定转诊医院与墨西哥国家烧伤中心之间TBSA估算不一致的普遍性和严重程度,并引入新的远程医疗和移动应用程序,以便为未接受过烧伤培训的人员有效估算烧伤面积。我们从转诊电子邮件和医疗记录中收集数据,并使用以下公式计算烧伤估计误差:(结果共有 78 名患者转入该研究所,平均年龄为 27 岁,其中 55 人为男性。转诊医院的平均 TBSA 百分比为 36%,而我们烧伤中心的平均 TBSA 百分比为 28%,两者平均相差 8.8%。结论:我们的研究结果表明,转诊医院估计的 TBSA 百分比与实际的 TBSA 百分比之间存在很大差异,而且一直倾向于高估。
{"title":"Burn vs. Referral Physicians' TBSA Estimation Errors: A Cross-Sectional Study at the National Burn Center","authors":"Alejandro Angel Corona-Figueroa ,&nbsp;Mario Vélez-Palafox ,&nbsp;Erik Agustin Marquez-Gutierrez ,&nbsp;Erika Barlandas-Quintana ,&nbsp;Samuel Eloy Gutierrez-Barreto","doi":"10.1016/j.burnso.2024.100361","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.burnso.2024.100361","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The percentage of the total body surface area (TBSA) is a simplified way to address the magnitude and severity of a thermal injury. The burn care providers recognize the relationship between burn size, prognosis, and number of required interventions. This study aims to identify the prevalence and magnitude of TBSA estimation inconsistencies between referring hospitals and the National Burn Center in Mexico and introduce new telemedicine and mobile applications for effectively estimating burn areas for non-burn-trained personnel.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We included patients with any thermal injury at the National Rehabilitation Institute in Mexico City referred from any other hospital in the country. Data was collected from the referral email and our medical records, and the burn estimation error was calculated using the following formula: (TBSA referral Hospital – TBSA Burn Center) / TBSA Burn Center multiplied by 100.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Seventy-eight patients were transferred to the institute; the mean age was 27 years, 55 were male. The mean %TBSA from the referring hospital was 36 %, and in our Burn Center was 28 %, with a mean difference of 8.8 %. There were 59 cases with overestimated %TBSA, and ten were underestimated; the rest were similar in percentage.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our study highlights substantial discrepancies between the estimated %TBSA by referring hospitals and the actual %TBSA, consistently tending towards overestimation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72486,"journal":{"name":"Burns open : an international open access journal for burn injuries","volume":"8 4","pages":"Article 100361"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S246891222400049X/pdfft?md5=cdecf09df87b374863c335044dc20fc9&pid=1-s2.0-S246891222400049X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141843576","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Characteristics of pediatric burns complications in the main referral hospital of Mozambique 莫桑比克主要转诊医院小儿烧伤并发症的特点
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.burnso.2024.100362
Luísa Huo , Shannon Richardson , Celma Issufo , Valeria Chicamba , Baltazar Chilundo , Natércia Fernandes , Vanda Amado

Background

Burns remains a major preventable cause of injury in children worldwide with morbidity and mortality disproportionately affecting low- and middle-income countries. Complications following burn injuries in children are not well studied in Mozambique.

Methods

Children between 1 month and 14 years old hospitalized for burns between 2015 and 2017 at Hospital Central de Maputo were identified retrospectively. Child and burns characteristics were compiled with complications including wound infection, sepsis, anemia, hypoalbuminemia, hyperglycemia, and dehydration. The association of complications with demographic variables and burn characteristics were assessed through bivariate analysis.

Results

Of the 206 children, the most common cause of burns was hot liquids (66%), followed by fire (28%) and electrical current (6%). Children aged one to four years old were most frequently affected (54%). Of the 91 children with complications, 68% had severe burns with a significant relationship between lesion depth and complications. Among the complications, hypoalbuminemia (56%), hyperglycemia (51%), and wound infections (17%) were the most common. Children who had flame/fire burns and 2nd and 3rd degree burns were associate with a greater risk of having complications.

Conclusions

Pediatric burns in the early years are more frequent in Mozambique and hold a high burden of complications. Moreover, flame/fire burns and 2nd and 3rd degree burns were associated with increased odds of complications. Primary prevention measures within the family will be critical to minimize pediatric burns and additional research is warranted to better understand clinical interventions to prevent mortality and complications in low- and middle-income countries.

背景烧伤仍然是全世界儿童受伤的主要可预防原因,发病率和死亡率对低收入和中等收入国家的影响尤为严重。在莫桑比克,对儿童烧伤后并发症的研究并不充分。方法回顾性地识别了 2015 年至 2017 年期间在马普托中央医院因烧伤住院的 1 个月至 14 岁的儿童。对儿童和烧伤特征以及并发症(包括伤口感染、败血症、贫血、低蛋白血症、高血糖和脱水)进行了汇总。结果 在206名儿童中,最常见的烧伤原因是热液体(66%),其次是火(28%)和电流(6%)。1至4岁的儿童最常见(54%)。在91名出现并发症的儿童中,68%为重度烧伤,病变深度与并发症之间存在显著关系。在并发症中,最常见的是低白蛋白血症(56%)、高血糖(51%)和伤口感染(17%)。在莫桑比克,儿童早期烧伤的发生率较高,并发症的发生率也较高。此外,火焰/火烧伤以及二度和三度烧伤与并发症的几率增加有关。家庭内部的初级预防措施对于最大限度地减少小儿烧伤至关重要,因此有必要开展更多研究,以更好地了解在低收入和中等收入国家预防死亡率和并发症的临床干预措施。
{"title":"Characteristics of pediatric burns complications in the main referral hospital of Mozambique","authors":"Luísa Huo ,&nbsp;Shannon Richardson ,&nbsp;Celma Issufo ,&nbsp;Valeria Chicamba ,&nbsp;Baltazar Chilundo ,&nbsp;Natércia Fernandes ,&nbsp;Vanda Amado","doi":"10.1016/j.burnso.2024.100362","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.burnso.2024.100362","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Burns remains a major preventable cause of injury in children worldwide with morbidity and mortality disproportionately affecting low- and middle-income countries. Complications following burn injuries in children are not well studied in Mozambique.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Children between 1 month and 14 years old hospitalized for burns between 2015 and 2017 at Hospital Central de Maputo were identified retrospectively. Child and burns characteristics were compiled with complications including wound infection, sepsis, anemia, hypoalbuminemia, hyperglycemia, and dehydration. The association of complications with demographic variables and burn characteristics were assessed through bivariate analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 206 children, the most common cause of burns was hot liquids (66%), followed by fire (28%) and electrical current (6%). Children aged one to four years old were most frequently affected (54%). Of the 91 children with complications, 68% had severe burns with a significant relationship between lesion depth and complications. Among the complications, hypoalbuminemia (56%), hyperglycemia (51%), and wound infections (17%) were the most common. Children who had flame/fire burns and 2nd and 3rd degree burns were associate with a greater risk of having complications.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Pediatric burns in the early years are more frequent in Mozambique and hold a high burden of complications. Moreover, flame/fire burns and 2nd and 3rd degree burns were associated with increased odds of complications. Primary prevention measures within the family will be critical to minimize pediatric burns and additional research is warranted to better understand clinical interventions to prevent mortality and complications in low- and middle-income countries.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72486,"journal":{"name":"Burns open : an international open access journal for burn injuries","volume":"8 4","pages":"Article 100362"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468912224000506/pdfft?md5=9995c153ba6c8c5a9718d96e98363ae8&pid=1-s2.0-S2468912224000506-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141838953","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Characteristics of patients with burn injuries managed at a tertiary care centre 一家三级医疗中心收治的烧伤患者的特征
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.burnso.2024.100360
Suntharamoorthy Iyer Thuraisamy Sarma, Sreekanthan Gobishangar, Suwaminathan Thiruvarangan, Nadarajah Hamsavakini, Paramanathan Shathana

Introduction

Burn injuries are becoming a growing burden, negatively impacting both individuals and society. They affect a person’s health and lead to psychosocial and economic problems. This study evaluates the prevalence, characteristics, and short-term outcomes of patients with burn injuries admitted to a tertiary care hospital in Northern Sri Lanka.

Methods

This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted on patients with burn injuries admitted to Tertiary care centre Jaffna over six months in 2023. Ethical clearance was obtained from the Ethics Review Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Jaffna. Baseline characteristics and clinical features during hospitalisation were recorded. Categorical variables were compared using the Chi-square test, with post hoc Tukey tests conducted where applicable.

Results

This study included 57 patients aged 1 to 88 years, with a mean age of 35.19 ± 21.16 years. Most participants were female (53.4 %), and most had completed secondary education (62.1 %). Approximately 65.5 % were employed in unskilled jobs, with the remainder in skilled professions. Accidental burns were the most common cause (72.4 %), with 84.5 % of injuries occurring at home, though suicide-related burns accounted for 24.1 %. Flame-related burns constituted 50 % of injuries, with first-degree burns being the most common (44.8 %). The availability of first aid significantly influenced outcomes, with 74.1 % receiving assistance, primarily through removing clothing (43.8 %) and using running water (15.8 %). A combined approach of care was received by most patients (52.7 %), while 8.8 % were hospitalised in the plastic and reconstructive surgery department. Many patients had burns covering less than 10 % of their body surface area (46.6 %).

Conclusion

The findings of this study on patients with burn injuries underscore the importance of understanding the causes of burns, administering appropriate first aid, recognising different injury types and severities, assessing the total burn surface area, and tailoring patient treatment. These insights are crucial for informing prevention strategies and healthcare planning, aiming to mitigate the impact of burn injuries and improve patient outcomes.

导言烧伤正在成为一个日益沉重的负担,对个人和社会都造成了负面影响。烧伤不仅影响个人健康,还会导致社会心理和经济问题。本研究评估了斯里兰卡北部一家三级护理医院收治的烧伤患者的发病率、特征和短期疗效。 方法本前瞻性横断面研究针对 2023 年 6 个月内在贾夫纳三级护理中心收治的烧伤患者。研究获得了贾夫纳大学医学院伦理审查委员会的伦理许可。记录了住院期间的基线特征和临床特征。采用卡方检验对分类变量进行比较,并酌情进行Tukey事后检验。结果本研究共纳入57名患者,年龄在1至88岁之间,平均年龄为(35.19 ± 21.16)岁。大多数参与者为女性(53.4%),大多数受过中等教育(62.1%)。约 65.5% 从事非技术性工作,其余从事技术性职业。意外烧伤是最常见的原因(72.4%),其中 84.5% 的伤害发生在家中,但与自杀有关的烧伤占 24.1%。与火焰有关的烧伤占受伤人数的 50%,其中一级烧伤最为常见(44.8%)。急救措施的可用性对结果有很大影响,74.1%的人接受了援助,主要是通过脱掉衣服(43.8%)和使用自来水(15.8%)。大多数患者(52.7%)接受了综合治疗,8.8%的患者在整形外科住院治疗。许多患者的烧伤面积不足体表面积的 10%(46.6%)。 结论:这项针对烧伤患者的研究结果表明,了解烧伤的原因、实施适当的急救、识别不同的损伤类型和严重程度、评估烧伤总面积以及对患者进行针对性治疗非常重要。这些见解对于制定预防策略和医疗保健规划至关重要,其目的是减轻烧伤的影响并改善患者的预后。
{"title":"Characteristics of patients with burn injuries managed at a tertiary care centre","authors":"Suntharamoorthy Iyer Thuraisamy Sarma,&nbsp;Sreekanthan Gobishangar,&nbsp;Suwaminathan Thiruvarangan,&nbsp;Nadarajah Hamsavakini,&nbsp;Paramanathan Shathana","doi":"10.1016/j.burnso.2024.100360","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burnso.2024.100360","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Burn injuries are becoming a growing burden, negatively impacting both individuals and society. They affect a person’s health and lead to psychosocial and economic problems. This study evaluates the prevalence, characteristics, and short-term outcomes of patients with burn injuries admitted to a tertiary care hospital in Northern Sri Lanka.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted on patients with burn injuries admitted to Tertiary care centre Jaffna over six months in 2023. Ethical clearance was obtained from the Ethics Review Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Jaffna. Baseline characteristics and clinical features during hospitalisation were recorded. Categorical variables were compared using the Chi-square test, with post hoc Tukey tests conducted where applicable.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>This study included 57 patients aged 1 to 88 years, with a mean age of 35.19 ± 21.16 years. Most participants were female (53.4 %), and most had completed secondary education (62.1 %). Approximately 65.5 % were employed in unskilled jobs, with the remainder in skilled professions. Accidental burns were the most common cause (72.4 %), with 84.5 % of injuries occurring at home, though suicide-related burns accounted for 24.1 %. Flame-related burns constituted 50 % of injuries, with first-degree burns being the most common (44.8 %). The availability of first aid significantly influenced outcomes, with 74.1 % receiving assistance, primarily through removing clothing (43.8 %) and using running water (15.8 %). A combined approach of care was received by most patients (52.7 %), while 8.8 % were hospitalised in the plastic and reconstructive surgery department. Many patients had burns covering less than 10 % of their body surface area (46.6 %).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The findings of this study on patients with burn injuries underscore the importance of understanding the causes of burns, administering appropriate first aid, recognising different injury types and severities, assessing the total burn surface area, and tailoring patient treatment. These insights are crucial for informing prevention strategies and healthcare planning, aiming to mitigate the impact of burn injuries and improve patient outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72486,"journal":{"name":"Burns open : an international open access journal for burn injuries","volume":"8 4","pages":"Article 100360"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468912224000488/pdfft?md5=a124304ab43abb497a38d80710e70b16&pid=1-s2.0-S2468912224000488-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141605597","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Too hot to handle − Microwaved drinkware: An emerging cause of contact burn injuries? 热到无法处理--微波炉加热的饮料器具:接触性烧伤的新成因?
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.burnso.2024.100359
Tamara Mertz, Amr Elassy, Christopher Wearn

Purpose of the study

To investigate the local and national incidence of contact burns secondary to microwave-heated drinkware and specifically those with a metallic coating.

Methods

This retrospective analysis from November 2018 to December 2022 includes UK-wide data on burn mechanism, demographics, TBSA (total body surface area), depth and additionally, local data on injury details, management, complications, healing duration, return-to-work time, and follow-up duration within our service.

Results

National: In the UK, 87 patients sustained burns related to microwave heating of drinkware. Median (IQR) burn size was 0.21% (+/−0.15) TBSA. Most burn injuries were superficial dermal (SD) (88.7%). All cases were treated conservatively.

Regional: Contact burns from microwave-heated metallic coated drinkware were identified in 28 patients. The median (IQR) TBSA was 0.12% (+/−0). Most injuries were assessed as SD (90%, 45/50), however, 4/5 (80%) of the deeper burns were caused by metallic-coated drinkware. The median (IQR) follow-up was 6.04 days (+/−4.5). Median (IQR) healing time was 14.17 (+/−0) days and mean time to return to work was 7.57 (+/−3.5) days.

Conclusions

Microwave-heated drinkware burns, while constituting a small portion of referrals to UK burns services, may have a larger true population incidence. Due to their size, these injuries are probably treated locally without referral to a burns service. Regional data analysis highlighted that metallic coated drinkware related injuries were associated with longer healing times.

研究目的调查继发于微波加热的饮料器具,特别是带有金属涂层的饮料器具的接触性烧伤的地方和全国发病率。方法从 2018 年 11 月到 2022 年 12 月的这项回顾性分析包括英国范围内有关烧伤机制、人口统计学、TBSA(体表总面积)、深度的数据,此外还包括我们服务范围内有关损伤细节、管理、并发症、愈合持续时间、恢复工作时间和随访持续时间的地方数据。结果全国:在英国,87 名患者因微波加热饮料器具而遭受烧伤。烧伤面积的中位数(IQR)为总面积的 0.21% (+/-0.15) 。大多数烧伤为表皮烧伤(SD)(88.7%)。所有病例均接受了保守治疗:微波加热的金属涂层饮料器皿导致接触性烧伤的患者有 28 例。中位(IQR)总灼伤面积为 0.12% (+/-0)。大多数烧伤被评估为自发烧伤(90%,45/50),然而,4/5(80%)的深度烧伤是由带金属涂层的饮料器具造成的。随访的中位数(IQR)为 6.04 天(+/-4.5)。中位(IQR)愈合时间为 14.17 (+/-0) 天,恢复工作的平均时间为 7.57 (+/-3.5) 天。由于其规模较小,这些损伤很可能在当地得到治疗,而无需转诊到烧伤服务机构。地区数据分析强调,与金属涂层饮料器具相关的损伤需要较长的愈合时间。
{"title":"Too hot to handle − Microwaved drinkware: An emerging cause of contact burn injuries?","authors":"Tamara Mertz,&nbsp;Amr Elassy,&nbsp;Christopher Wearn","doi":"10.1016/j.burnso.2024.100359","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burnso.2024.100359","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose of the study</h3><p>To investigate the local and national incidence of contact burns secondary to microwave-heated drinkware and specifically those with a metallic coating.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective analysis from November 2018 to December 2022 includes UK-wide data on burn mechanism, demographics, TBSA (total body surface area), depth and additionally, local data on injury details, management, complications, healing duration, return-to-work time, and follow-up duration within our service.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><em>National:</em> In the UK, 87 patients sustained burns related to microwave heating of drinkware. Median (IQR) burn size was 0.21% (+/−0.15) TBSA. Most burn injuries were superficial dermal (SD) (88.7%). All cases were treated conservatively.</p><p><em>Regional:</em> Contact burns from microwave-heated metallic coated drinkware were identified in 28 patients. The median (IQR) TBSA was 0.12% (+/−0). Most injuries were assessed as SD (90%, 45/50), however, 4/5 (80%) of the deeper burns were caused by metallic-coated drinkware. The median (IQR) follow-up was 6.04 days (+/−4.5). Median (IQR) healing time was 14.17 (+/−0) days and mean time to return to work was 7.57 (+/−3.5) days.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Microwave-heated drinkware burns, while constituting a small portion of referrals to UK burns services, may have a larger true population incidence. Due to their size, these injuries are probably treated locally without referral to a burns service. Regional data analysis highlighted that metallic coated drinkware related injuries were associated with longer healing times.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72486,"journal":{"name":"Burns open : an international open access journal for burn injuries","volume":"8 4","pages":"Article 100359"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468912224000476/pdfft?md5=d77c48aea66bb87a41a84dc43abdc9d3&pid=1-s2.0-S2468912224000476-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141594571","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prevalence and characteristics of paediatric burns at the National Reconstructive Plastic Surgery and Burns Centre, Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Ghana 加纳科勒布教学医院国家整形外科和烧伤中心小儿烧伤的发病率和特点
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.burnso.2024.100358
Alberta Amissah Rockson , Natalie Benjamin-Damons , Sonti Imogene Pilusa

Introduction

Burn injuries among children have emerged as a significant global public health concern, accounting for substantial morbidity and mortality worldwide. Low and Middle-Income Countries bear a significant burden of paediatric burn injuries. In Ghana, limited data exists on the prevalence, characteristics and outcomes of paediatric burns. This study provides vital data on the local burden and epidemiology of paediatric burns at Ghana’s main burns treatment center. The findings have significant value in informing prevention strategies, allocating resources, and improving quality of paediatric burn care.

Study objective

To establish the prevalence and characteristics of paediatric burns injuries in Ghana’s leading burn center.

Methodology

A retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 662 adult and paediatric patients who presented with burns from all over Ghana between 2020 and 2022. The study encompassed medical records of paediatric burn cases (aged 0–14 years) admitted to the center from January 2020 to December 2022. A purposive sampling technique was used to select cases based on the inclusion criteria and elimination of cases with 20 % missing data. A total of 335 paediatric records were reviewed.

Data analytical methods

Descriptive statistics, such as frequencies, mean, percentages were used to establish period prevalence and demographic characteristics of paediatric burns. Chi-square analysis and univariate logistic regression was utilized to explore associations between categorical variables, and predictors of burn outcome.

Results

The period prevalence of paediatric burns was found to be 50.6 %. Paediatric burn cases predominantly affected males (57.6 %). Majority of cases fell within the age range of 1 to 5 years (70.1 %). Hot water emerged as the leading cause (58.4 %), whiles superficial partial thickness burns (51.9 %) was the predominant type of burn. Most cases involved burns affecting less than 20 % Total Body Surface Area (59.0 %). Multi-part body injuries were common (87.2 %), with the lower limb being the most affected (25.36 %). The mortality rate was calculated to be 21.0 %. Higher TBSA was a significant predictor of mortality (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

This study found a high prevalence of paediatric burns with hot water and foods being the predominant causes. Higher TBSA predicted lower chances of survival. The findings have scientific value in informing prevention strategies, allocating resources, and improving the quality of care.

导言儿童烧伤已成为全球公共卫生的一个重大问题,在全世界造成了大量的发病率和死亡率。中低收入国家承受着儿童烧伤的沉重负担。在加纳,有关儿科烧伤的发病率、特征和结果的数据十分有限。这项研究提供了加纳主要烧伤治疗中心当地儿童烧伤负担和流行病学的重要数据。研究目的 确定加纳主要烧伤治疗中心儿童烧伤的发病率和特征。方法 一项回顾性队列研究分析了 2020 年至 2022 年期间来自加纳各地的 662 名成人和儿童烧伤患者的数据。研究涵盖了 2020 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月期间该中心收治的儿童烧伤病例(0-14 岁)的医疗记录。研究采用目的性抽样技术,根据纳入标准选择病例,并剔除数据缺失率为 20% 的病例。数据分析方法采用频率、平均值、百分比等描述性统计来确定烧伤儿童的患病率和人口统计学特征。利用卡方分析和单变量逻辑回归探讨分类变量与烧伤结果预测因素之间的关联。儿童烧伤病例以男性为主(57.6%)。大多数病例的年龄在 1 至 5 岁之间(70.1%)。热水是烧伤的主要原因(58.4%),而浅表部分厚度烧伤(51.9%)是烧伤的主要类型。大多数病例的烧伤面积小于体表总面积的 20%(59.0%)。身体多处受伤的情况很常见(87.2%),下肢受影响最大(25.36%)。死亡率为 21.0%。总热辐射面积越大,死亡率越高(p < 0.001)。TBSA越高,预示着存活的几率越低。研究结果对制定预防策略、分配资源和提高护理质量具有科学价值。
{"title":"Prevalence and characteristics of paediatric burns at the National Reconstructive Plastic Surgery and Burns Centre, Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Ghana","authors":"Alberta Amissah Rockson ,&nbsp;Natalie Benjamin-Damons ,&nbsp;Sonti Imogene Pilusa","doi":"10.1016/j.burnso.2024.100358","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burnso.2024.100358","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Burn injuries among children have emerged as a significant global public health concern, accounting for substantial morbidity and mortality worldwide. Low and Middle-Income Countries bear a significant burden of paediatric burn injuries. In Ghana, limited data exists on the prevalence, characteristics and outcomes of paediatric burns. This study provides vital data on the local burden and epidemiology of paediatric burns at Ghana’s main burns treatment center. The findings have significant value in informing prevention strategies, allocating resources, and improving quality of paediatric burn care.</p></div><div><h3>Study objective</h3><p>To establish the prevalence and characteristics of paediatric burns injuries in Ghana’s leading burn center.</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>A retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 662 adult and paediatric patients who presented with burns from all over Ghana between 2020 and 2022. The study encompassed medical records of paediatric burn cases (aged 0–14 years) admitted to the center from January 2020 to December 2022. A purposive sampling technique was used to select cases based on the inclusion criteria and elimination of cases with 20 % missing data. A total of 335 paediatric records were reviewed.</p></div><div><h3>Data analytical methods</h3><p>Descriptive statistics, such as frequencies, mean, percentages were used to establish period prevalence and demographic characteristics of paediatric burns. Chi-square analysis and univariate logistic regression was utilized to explore associations between categorical variables, and predictors of burn outcome.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The period prevalence of paediatric burns was found to be 50.6 %. Paediatric burn cases predominantly affected males (57.6 %). Majority of cases fell within the age range of 1 to 5 years (70.1 %). Hot water emerged as the leading cause (58.4 %), whiles superficial partial thickness burns (51.9 %) was the predominant type of burn. Most cases involved burns affecting less than 20 % Total Body Surface Area (59.0 %). Multi-part body injuries were common (87.2 %), with the lower limb being the most affected (25.36 %). The mortality rate was calculated to be 21.0 %. Higher TBSA was a significant predictor of mortality (p &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study found a high prevalence of paediatric burns with hot water and foods being the predominant causes. Higher TBSA predicted lower chances of survival. The findings have scientific value in informing prevention strategies, allocating resources, and improving the quality of care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72486,"journal":{"name":"Burns open : an international open access journal for burn injuries","volume":"8 4","pages":"Article 100358"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468912224000464/pdfft?md5=738e7741addc028c0101f1d772465df3&pid=1-s2.0-S2468912224000464-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141541241","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Burns open : an international open access journal for burn injuries
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1