From their early genesis, tumour cells integrate with the surrounding normal cells to form an abnormal structure that is tightly integrated with the host organism via blood and lymphatic vessels and even neural associations. Using these connections, emerging cancers send a plethora of mediators that efficiently perturb the entire organism and induce changes in distant tissues. These perturbations serendipitously favour early metastatic establishment by promoting a more favourable tissue environment (niche) that supports the persistence of disseminated tumour cells within a foreign tissue. Because the establishment of early metastatic niches represents a key limiting step for metastasis, the creation of a more suitable pre-conditioned tissue strongly enhances metastatic success. In this Review, we provide an updated view of the mechanisms and mediators of primary tumours described so far that induce a pro-metastatic conditioning of distant organs, which favours early metastatic niche formation. We reflect on the nature of cancer-induced systemic conditioning, considering that non-cancer-dependent perturbations of tissue homeostasis are also able to trigger pro-metastatic conditioning. We argue that a more holistic view of the processes catalysing metastatic progression is needed to identify preventive or therapeutic opportunities.
Splicing factors are affected by recurrent somatic mutations and copy number variations in several types of haematologic and solid malignancies, which is often seen as prima facie evidence that splicing aberrations can drive cancer initiation and progression. However, numerous spliceosome components also ‘moonlight’ in DNA repair and other cellular processes, making their precise role in cancer difficult to pinpoint. Still, few would deny that dysregulated mRNA splicing is a pervasive feature of most cancers. Correctly interpreting these molecular fingerprints can reveal novel tumour vulnerabilities and untapped therapeutic opportunities. Yet multiple technological challenges, lingering misconceptions, and outstanding questions hinder clinical translation. To start with, the general landscape of splicing aberrations in cancer is not well defined, due to limitations of short-read RNA sequencing not adept at resolving complete mRNA isoforms, as well as the shallow read depth inherent in long-read RNA-sequencing, especially at single-cell level. Although individual cancer-associated isoforms are known to contribute to cancer progression, widespread splicing alterations could be an equally important and, perhaps, more readily actionable feature of human cancers. This is to say that in addition to ‘repairing’ mis-spliced transcripts, possible therapeutic avenues include exacerbating splicing aberration with small-molecule spliceosome inhibitors, targeting recurrent splicing aberrations with synthetic lethal approaches, and training the immune system to recognize splicing-derived neoantigens.