Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)最新文献

Background: Most management of chronic pain, a serious illness affecting the physical and psychological wellbeing of millions, occurs in primary care settings. Primary care practitioners (PCPs) attempt to provide evidence-based practices to treat chronic pain. However, there continues to be a gap between the care people receive and the evidence. The objectives for this study were to (1) explore determinants of evidence-based chronic pain management and (2) develop a novel approach to using implementation science to address the evidence-practice gap.

Method: A convenience sample of twenty-one Pennsylvania PCPs participated in one-time semi-structured telephone interviews. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and both deductive and inductive approaches were used during analysis. We used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) to inform our analysis and findings.

Results: We identified determinants of evidence-based chronic pain management across the CFIR domains of Intervention Characteristics, Characteristics of Individuals, and the Outer Setting and reported implementation strategies. Based on identified themes, we developed a three-step process to support the ongoing and pragmatic implementation of evidence-based chronic pain management in primary care settings.

Conclusions: Previous efforts exist to integrate implementation science into chronic pain management; yet a gap persists. Implementation approaches should prioritize the needs of people living with chronic pain and their families. Further, future approaches or strategies used should build on the current three-step model to include the fourth step of tailoring existing implementation strategies to the specific needs of chronic pain in the clinical context.

To an individual, pain is unambiguously real. To a caregiver, assessing pain in others is a challenging process shrouded in doubt. To explain this challenge, many assume that pain "belongs" exclusively to the bearer of that experience and accept the dogma that pain is private. However, privacy also entails that it is not possible to identify, share, or communicate that experience with others. Obviously, this is not true and the consequences of pain privacy would be devastating for healthcare. Pain is indeed unique and subjective, but not necessarily private. Pain is in fact readily communicable, though perhaps not as effectively and reliably as caregivers would like. On the other hand, healthcare systems mandate objective metrics in pain diagnosis. Smiley face caricatures are a staple of clinical practice and a universal standard for reporting pain levels. These conditions create a double paradox: Assess a private experience that is inaccessible, and use numerical scales to measure subjective attributes. Navigating this stressful environment, medical professionals experience intellectual dissonance, patients are frustrated, and value-based care is undermined. Offering a way out, first, we refute the privacy and objectification of pain citing philosophical, behavioral, and neuroscientific arguments. We discuss Wittgensteinian views against privacy, explore the clear evolutionary advantage of communicating pain to others, and identify neural circuits in the mammalian brain that contribute to empathy. Second, we highlight the subjectivity of pain, embracing the complexity and uniqueness of an individual's pain. We also provide compelling evidence for brain mechanisms that actively shape the pain experience according to predictive coding principles. Third, we offer a vision for the development of biomarker technologies that assess pain fairly without engendering bias against the patient's narrative. Our recommendations are based on the overwhelming appreciation that "medicine by emoji" is inadequate for capturing the multidimensional nature of pain. Our view is that the most promising candidates for pain biomarkers consist of self-reports as ground truth augmented by physiological signatures of biological relevance to pain. Integration of subjective and objective multimodal features will be key for the development of comprehensive pain assessment models.

Introduction: Chronic low back pain (cLBP) poses significant challenges, often addressed through avoidance or distraction. Emerging evidence suggests that mind-body interventions, like our novel Mind Your Pain (MyP) smartphone mobile application, may offer relief. We conducted a single-arm, mixed-methods neuroimaging study to assess the degree to which treatment response to our 8-week intervention, as measured by the reduction in the Pain, Enjoyment of Life and General Activity Scale (PEG), was associated with enhanced pain-related insula activation over time.

Methods: Twenty-nine individuals with cLBP completed patient-reported assessments, qualitative sensory testing (QST) measures, and neuroimaging pre- and post-MyP. Functional MRI data during experimental heat pain on the left forearm were collected and analyzed, comparing responders (≥50% reduction in PEG scores) and non-responders.

Results: MyP led to significant decreases in PEG scores overall. Furthermore, MyP responders exhibited increased pain-related activation in key brain regions, including the contralateral posterior insula, bilateral ventral anterior insula, ventral anterior cingulate, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and nucleus accumbens. Although baseline behavioral and sensory measures did not differ between the two responder groups, baseline neural differences related to the impact of the endogenous back pain were observed.

Discussion: MyP appears to modify pain response and underlying neural circuitry, suggesting neural changes in interoception may serve as biomarkers for mind-body interventions in cLBP. This study highlights the potential of MyP as a novel approach for cLBP management, warranting further investigation.

Pain is a common symptom of many clinical diseases; it adversely affects patients' physical and mental health, reduces their quality of life, and heavily burdens patients and society. Pain treatment is one of the most difficult problems today. There is an urgent need to explore the potential factors involved in the pathogenesis of pain to improve its diagnosis and treatment rate. Piezo1/2, a newly identified mechanosensitive ion channel opens in response to mechanical stimuli and plays a critical role in regulating pain-related diseases. Inhibition or downregulation of Piezo1/2 alleviates disease-induced pain. Therefore, in this study, we comprehensively discussed the biology of this gene, focusing on its potential relevance in pain-related diseases, and explored the pharmacological effects of drugs using this gene for the treatment of pain.

Introduction: Musculoskeletal pain affecting children is common. Rehabilitation and treatment effectiveness can be influenced by multiple individual and contextual factors. The need for more rigorous evaluation of physiotherapy treatment for children's pain, identification of the role of specific techniques, and exploration of the influence of the therapeutic alliance is needed. This scoping review of research aimed to examine: (1) What are the perceptions of children, parents, and physiotherapists about the importance of therapeutic alliance during musculoskeletal pain treatment? (2) What are the key characteristics of therapeutic alliance during a child's musculoskeletal pain treatment from the perspectives of children, parents, and physiotherapists? and (3) What are the perceived impacts of therapeutic alliance (positive and negative) during a child's physiotherapy treatment for musculoskeletal pain?

Methods: The scoping review, based on Arksey and O'Malley's framework and reporting was guided by PRISMA-ScR. The search strategy was based on three concept blocks: (1) Study population: Children (<18 years); (2) Medical condition: Any musculoskeletal pain (acute, chronic primary, chronic secondary); (3) Intervention: Qualitative exploration of experience of physiotherapy treatment delivered by a physiotherapist from the perspective of a child, parent, or physiotherapist. The search (no date limit) was conducted in February 2024 across Medline, AMED and CINAHL.

Results: Following duplicate removal and assessment of eligibility of the initial 236 articles, nine articles were included; of these, only one specifically aimed to explore therapeutic alliance and it was the only paper to directly mention therapeutic alliance. All nine articles presented the child's experience. One overarching theme "Finding resilience within me through therapeutic alliance" and three main themes: "A trusted guide through the ups and the downs of rehabilitation"; "Having a route map"; and "Take me seriously but make it fun" were identified.

Discussion: Therapeutic alliance was considered important by children, parents and physiotherapist and it influenced child and parent perceptions of physiotherapy and overall treatment outcomes. Physiotherapists can foster the children's resilience when experiencing musculoskeletal pain by providing disciplinary expertise, connecting and collaborating with the child by becoming their trusted guide, and co-creating a route map for rehabilitation by helping them to learn about their body, pain and recovery timeline.

Background: There is an urgent need to confirm biomarkers reflecting the pathogenesis and targeted drugs of lower back pain or/and sciatica in clinical practice. This study aimed to conduct a two sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to explore the causal link between 486 serum metabolites and lower back pain or/and sciatica.

Methods: All data come from two public shared databases of European ancestry and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for lower back pain or/and sciatica acted as instrumental variables. The traditional inverse variance weighting (IVW) method, weighted-median method, MR-Egger methodand other methods were used to estimate causality. The horizontal pleiotropy, heterogeneities were also verified through the MR-Egger intercept test, Cochran's Q test, MR-PRESSO test and the leave-one-out sensitivity analysis. Reverse MR analysis was employed to evaluate the direct impact of metabolites on lower back pain or/and sciatica. Additionally, we conducted the colocalization analysis to reflect the causality deeply. Furthermore, metabolic pathway analysis was performed.

Results: 28 metabolites (18 known metabolites, 1 identified metabolites and 9 unknown metabolites) relevant to the risk of sciatica or/and lower back pain after using genetic variants as probes at P_IVW < 0.05 were identifed. Among them, 8 serum metabolites decreased risk of sciatica or/and lower back pain significantly (P < 0.05), and 14 serum metabolites increased risk of sciatica or/and lower back pain significantly (P < 0.05). No reverse causal association was found between 28 metabolites and sciatica or/and lower back pain. Colocalization analysis results showed that the associations between sciatica or/and lower back pain and the 28 identified metabolites were not due to shared causal variant sites. Moreover, pathway enrichment analysis identifed 11 signifcant metabolic pathways, which are mainly involved in the pathological mechanism of sciatica or/and lower back pain (P < 0.05). There was no horizontal pleiotropy or heterogeneity in the other analyses.

Conclusion: Our analyses provided robust evidence of causal associations between blood metabolites on sciatica or/and lower back pain. However, the underlying mechanisms remain to be further investigated.

Purpose: Despite their dangerous side effects, opioid drugs remain a standard of care for moderate to severe pain with few alternatives. Strategies to maintain the analgesic effects of opioids while minimizing the associated risks are needed. Pre-clinical studies have shown using a dopamine 3 receptor (D3R) agonist as an adjuvant to morphine provides superior analgesia against painful stimuli compared to morphine alone. Our objective was to test if adjunct treatment with a D3R agonist can lead to a reduction in opioid use while maintaining effective analgesia.

Patients and methods: This study was set up as a double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized trial. Enrollment included acute renal colic patients presenting to the emergency department, from which patients were randomized to either the "control" or "study arm". The control group received standard treatment of care (morphine, 0.1 mg/kg; i.v.) and an oral placebo pill. The experimental group received half-dosed morphine and oral pramipexole pill (0.25 mg). Pain measurements including a numerical pain scale and visual analog scale were collected from enrollees at baseline and every subsequent 15 min.

Results: A total of 19 patients completed the study, 10 in the experimental arm and 9 in the control arm. During the study period, effective analgesia (50% decrease from baseline) was achieved in 80% of patients in the experimental arm vs. 33.3% in the control arm.

Conclusion: Our pilot clinical trial demonstrated that D3R recruitment can serve as an effective adjuvant to low-dose morphine for control of renal colic pain and potentially other acute pain conditions.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier, (NCT04160520).

Introduction: Millions of women worldwide annually undergo manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) with no pain medication, which is a violation of their basic human dignity. We designed a novel device (Chloe SED®) to administer paracervical block (PCB) during MVA in countries where pain medication is not typically given due to the high cost of the necessary tools.

Methods: We conducted a single-blinded, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial including 61 patients at two hospitals in Kisumu, Kenya, to validate Chloe SED® for administration of PCB during MVA. PCB administered with Chloe SED® was compared to PCB administered with a standard spinal needle. Patients requiring MVA were block randomized in blocks of six, each provider completing six PCBs-three with the Chloe SED® and three with the standard spinal needle. The trial was registered with the Kenya Pharmacy and Poisons Board, ECCT/19/03/01 (https://ctr.pharmacyboardkenya.org/applications/index/protocol_no:RUNDVC8xOS8wMy8wMQ__/filter:/investigator:/sites:/pages:5/start_date:/end_date:/disease_condition:/users:/ercs:/stages). An intention-to-treat analysis was completed. The primary outcome was the non-inferiority of the pain score during uterine evacuation with a non-inferiority margin of 2 points on an 11-point numerical rating scale. Secondary outcomes included the non-inferiority of the pain score at four other time points and patient satisfaction.

Results: Chloe SED® showed non-inferiority of the primary outcome with a mean pain score during evacuation of 3.8 [90% confidence interval (CI): 3.1-4.6] compared with the spinal needle at 4.1 (90% CI: 3.5-4.7). Non-inferiority of the pain score was shown at all time points. Most patients expressed a desire for the continued use of the device to administer PCB for MVA. No adverse events were noted.

Conclusion: In summary, the Chloe SED® appears non-inferior to the spinal needle and desirable for the administration of PCB during MVA.