Pub Date : 2026-01-29eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2026.1733445
Jing Zhang, Yang Zhang, Jingxue Zhao, Jifei Sun, Xiaoxu Zhang
Chronic pain is a prevalent health issue with high disability rates, and traditional pharmacological treatments often come with limitations such as dependency and side effects. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS), as an emerging non-invasive neuromodulation technique, has demonstrated broad application prospects in chronic pain management in recent years. This systematic review examines the clinical efficacy of taVNS across multiple chronic pain conditions, including neuropathic pain, autoimmune disease-related pain, gastrointestinal pain, and musculoskeletal pain. It also delves into its neurobiological mechanisms, primarily involving activation of central descending pain control pathways, modulation of cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathways, balancing autonomic nervous system function, reshaping functional connectivity in brain networks, regulating neurotransmitter and neuropeptide balance, and inhibiting peripheral and central sensitization processes. Despite ongoing challenges in parameter standardization, in-depth mechanism elucidation, and personalized treatment strategies, taVNS offers an innovative therapeutic approach for chronic pain patients due to its favorable safety profile, tolerability, and multi-target regulatory advantages. Future large-scale clinical studies and multidisciplinary collaboration are needed to further advance the precision application of taVNS within comprehensive pain management systems.
{"title":"The role of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation in chronic pain: from neurobiological mechanisms to clinical applications.","authors":"Jing Zhang, Yang Zhang, Jingxue Zhao, Jifei Sun, Xiaoxu Zhang","doi":"10.3389/fpain.2026.1733445","DOIUrl":"10.3389/fpain.2026.1733445","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic pain is a prevalent health issue with high disability rates, and traditional pharmacological treatments often come with limitations such as dependency and side effects. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS), as an emerging non-invasive neuromodulation technique, has demonstrated broad application prospects in chronic pain management in recent years. This systematic review examines the clinical efficacy of taVNS across multiple chronic pain conditions, including neuropathic pain, autoimmune disease-related pain, gastrointestinal pain, and musculoskeletal pain. It also delves into its neurobiological mechanisms, primarily involving activation of central descending pain control pathways, modulation of cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathways, balancing autonomic nervous system function, reshaping functional connectivity in brain networks, regulating neurotransmitter and neuropeptide balance, and inhibiting peripheral and central sensitization processes. Despite ongoing challenges in parameter standardization, in-depth mechanism elucidation, and personalized treatment strategies, taVNS offers an innovative therapeutic approach for chronic pain patients due to its favorable safety profile, tolerability, and multi-target regulatory advantages. Future large-scale clinical studies and multidisciplinary collaboration are needed to further advance the precision application of taVNS within comprehensive pain management systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":73097,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":"7 ","pages":"1733445"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12894318/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146204094","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-29eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2026.1734386
Isabel Sadowski, Mael Gagnon-Mailhot, Gbeada Josiane Seu, Charles Sebiyo Batcho, Maude Laberge, Bassam Khoury, Gabriel Tremblay, Olivier Dubé, Charles Goyette, Antoine Rheault, Stephanie Glegg, Josiane Bissonnette, Carol Hudon, Anouk Lamontagne, Guillaume Léonard, Martin Lepage, Serge Marchand, Pierre Rainville, Alexandra Ribon-Demars, Harmehr Sekhon, Diane Tapp, Élisabeth Thibaudeau, Martine Bordeleau
Introduction: Immersive virtual reality (VR) has attracted growing interest in long-term care (LTC) as a potential tool to enhance well-being and alleviate pain. However, its effective implementation by LTC staff remains understudied. In a participatory action, mixed-methods study co-developed with knowledge users (LTC frontline staff and managers, and a VR developer), we applied the Decomposed Theory of Planned Behaviour (DTPB) to examine VR adoption in LTC and clarify barriers and facilitators to sustainable implementation.
Methods: Knowledge users were consulted to design and develop a single-phase, cross-sectional, convergent mixed-methods study. LTC staff (n = 16) were then recruited to complete an online self-report questionnaire specific to staff adoption of VR through the assessment of attitudes, social norms, perceived behavioural control and facilitating conditions. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively. Qualitative data underwent content analysis via DTPB-guided deductive and inductive codes.
Results: LTC staff indicated overall favourable attitudes towards VR use, yet only 25% (n = 4) of participants rated VR as easy to use and 50% (n = 8) deemed it suitable for LTC settings. Staff confidence with VR use was moderate, with resident selection and troubleshooting highlighted as particular challenges. Barriers such as lacking time to learn and use VR systems, as well as potential resident discomfort, were highlighted. Facilitators included adequate activity space, organizational support, and person-centred delivery, which staff linked to residents' relaxation, positive affect, and progressive engagement. Content analysis identified four key themes explaining these patterns: (1) Barriers outweighing promise, (2) Personalization of the VR experience, (3) Enabling conditions-Environment and organization, and (4) Staff ambivalence to VR.
Discussion: VR adoption appears to be linked to alignment between compatibility, ease-of-use, facilitating conditions, and social support. Person-centred delivery and organizational support may enable consistent use and enhance residents' relaxation, positive affect and progressive engagement, relevant to pain care. Findings offer a practical roadmap for integrating VR as a low-burden intervention, while highlighting areas needing further attention to promote sustainable implementation.
{"title":"Barriers and facilitators to implementing immersive virtual reality in long-term care settings: an interdisciplinary partnership study exploring staff perspectives.","authors":"Isabel Sadowski, Mael Gagnon-Mailhot, Gbeada Josiane Seu, Charles Sebiyo Batcho, Maude Laberge, Bassam Khoury, Gabriel Tremblay, Olivier Dubé, Charles Goyette, Antoine Rheault, Stephanie Glegg, Josiane Bissonnette, Carol Hudon, Anouk Lamontagne, Guillaume Léonard, Martin Lepage, Serge Marchand, Pierre Rainville, Alexandra Ribon-Demars, Harmehr Sekhon, Diane Tapp, Élisabeth Thibaudeau, Martine Bordeleau","doi":"10.3389/fpain.2026.1734386","DOIUrl":"10.3389/fpain.2026.1734386","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Immersive virtual reality (VR) has attracted growing interest in long-term care (LTC) as a potential tool to enhance well-being and alleviate pain. However, its effective implementation by LTC staff remains understudied. In a participatory action, mixed-methods study co-developed with knowledge users (LTC frontline staff and managers, and a VR developer), we applied the Decomposed Theory of Planned Behaviour (DTPB) to examine VR adoption in LTC and clarify barriers and facilitators to sustainable implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Knowledge users were consulted to design and develop a single-phase, cross-sectional, convergent mixed-methods study. LTC staff (<i>n</i> = 16) were then recruited to complete an online self-report questionnaire specific to staff adoption of VR through the assessment of attitudes, social norms, perceived behavioural control and facilitating conditions. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively. Qualitative data underwent content analysis via DTPB-guided deductive and inductive codes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LTC staff indicated overall favourable attitudes towards VR use, yet only 25% (<i>n</i> = 4) of participants rated VR as easy to use and 50% (<i>n</i> = 8) deemed it suitable for LTC settings. Staff confidence with VR use was moderate, with resident selection and troubleshooting highlighted as particular challenges. Barriers such as lacking time to learn and use VR systems, as well as potential resident discomfort, were highlighted. Facilitators included adequate activity space, organizational support, and person-centred delivery, which staff linked to residents' relaxation, positive affect, and progressive engagement. Content analysis identified four key themes explaining these patterns: (1) Barriers outweighing promise, (2) Personalization of the VR experience, (3) Enabling conditions-Environment and organization, and (4) Staff ambivalence to VR.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>VR adoption appears to be linked to alignment between compatibility, ease-of-use, facilitating conditions, and social support. Person-centred delivery and organizational support may enable consistent use and enhance residents' relaxation, positive affect and progressive engagement, relevant to pain care. Findings offer a practical roadmap for integrating VR as a low-burden intervention, while highlighting areas needing further attention to promote sustainable implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":73097,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":"7 ","pages":"1734386"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12894301/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146204002","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-27eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2025.1709268
Gloria T Han, Molly Basch, Diane Chen, Lonnie Zeltzer
Chronic pain-including both chronic primary pain (e.g., headaches, widespread musculoskeletal pain, abdominal pain) and chronic secondary pain associated with other health conditions-represents a significant yet underrecognized health concern among transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) youth. While data on the prevalence of chronic pain in TGD youth remain limited, early studies indicate higher rates compared to their cisgender peers, highlighting the need for understanding factors underlying this co-occurrence. Chronic pain arises from a complex interplay of neurobiological, psychological, and social factors, and its heightened prevalence in TGD youth may be driven by the compounded impact of biopsychosocial stressors that disproportionately affect this group. This review summarizes neurobiological vulnerabilities, psychosocial factors, and societal and systemic barriers that may contribute to increased risk of chronic pain in TGD youth. We also examine the role of gender-affirming care in addressing these biopsychosocial vulnerabilities and explore its potential to alleviate some of the factors associated with chronic pain. Additionally, we identify critical gaps in the current body of research, such as the need for longitudinal studies and deeper exploration of the effects of medical interventions like pubertal suppression and exogenous hormones on chronic pain mechanisms and outcomes. By synthesizing the available evidence, we aim to guide future research and offer actionable recommendations to enhance clinical care and support for TGD youth experiencing chronic pain.
{"title":"Chronic pain in transgender and gender-diverse youth: a biopsychosocial perspective.","authors":"Gloria T Han, Molly Basch, Diane Chen, Lonnie Zeltzer","doi":"10.3389/fpain.2025.1709268","DOIUrl":"10.3389/fpain.2025.1709268","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic pain-including both chronic primary pain (e.g., headaches, widespread musculoskeletal pain, abdominal pain) and chronic secondary pain associated with other health conditions-represents a significant yet underrecognized health concern among transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) youth. While data on the prevalence of chronic pain in TGD youth remain limited, early studies indicate higher rates compared to their cisgender peers, highlighting the need for understanding factors underlying this co-occurrence. Chronic pain arises from a complex interplay of neurobiological, psychological, and social factors, and its heightened prevalence in TGD youth may be driven by the compounded impact of biopsychosocial stressors that disproportionately affect this group. This review summarizes neurobiological vulnerabilities, psychosocial factors, and societal and systemic barriers that may contribute to increased risk of chronic pain in TGD youth. We also examine the role of gender-affirming care in addressing these biopsychosocial vulnerabilities and explore its potential to alleviate some of the factors associated with chronic pain. Additionally, we identify critical gaps in the current body of research, such as the need for longitudinal studies and deeper exploration of the effects of medical interventions like pubertal suppression and exogenous hormones on chronic pain mechanisms and outcomes. By synthesizing the available evidence, we aim to guide future research and offer actionable recommendations to enhance clinical care and support for TGD youth experiencing chronic pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":73097,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":"6 ","pages":"1709268"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12888031/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146167905","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-27eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2026.1712373
Abouch Valenty Krymchantowski, Carla Jevoux, Fabiola Dach, Carlos Alberto Bordini, Hilton Mariano Silva Júnior, Pedro Augusto Sampaio Rocha-Filho, Marcelo Moraes Valença, Renata Gomes Londero, Pedro André Kowacs, Élcio Juliato Piovesan, Luiz Paulo Queiroz, Raimundo Pereira Silva-Néto
Objective: To develop a position statement based on expert opinions for the management of medication overuse headache (MOH) in Brazil.
Method: This was an observational, prospective, descriptive, and opinion-based study. The experts were in several Brazilian states. Twelve experts who fulfilled the inclusion criteria completed a questionnaire that explored their experiences and approaches to managing MOH in both the private and public sectors.
Results: According to most experts, more than 50% of migraine patients have MOH and psychiatric comorbidities. Experts abruptly stop pain medications, prescribing a bridge treatment for more than 50% of patients. Acute treatment is administered for up to two days per week. Prophylaxis was initiated immediately, and topiramate and monoclonal antibodies were the first choices, respectively, for 36.3% and 54% of professionals. The first follow-up appointment should occur within 4 weeks.
Conclusions: Further guidelines based on evidence as well as expert opinions should be developed for the Brazilian reality, and future prospective studies can be conducted to compare the effects of different treatment regimens for MOH.
{"title":"Medication overuse headache: position statement of specialized headache centers in Brazil.","authors":"Abouch Valenty Krymchantowski, Carla Jevoux, Fabiola Dach, Carlos Alberto Bordini, Hilton Mariano Silva Júnior, Pedro Augusto Sampaio Rocha-Filho, Marcelo Moraes Valença, Renata Gomes Londero, Pedro André Kowacs, Élcio Juliato Piovesan, Luiz Paulo Queiroz, Raimundo Pereira Silva-Néto","doi":"10.3389/fpain.2026.1712373","DOIUrl":"10.3389/fpain.2026.1712373","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a position statement based on expert opinions for the management of medication overuse headache (MOH) in Brazil.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This was an observational, prospective, descriptive, and opinion-based study. The experts were in several Brazilian states. Twelve experts who fulfilled the inclusion criteria completed a questionnaire that explored their experiences and approaches to managing MOH in both the private and public sectors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to most experts, more than 50% of migraine patients have MOH and psychiatric comorbidities. Experts abruptly stop pain medications, prescribing a bridge treatment for more than 50% of patients. Acute treatment is administered for up to two days per week. Prophylaxis was initiated immediately, and topiramate and monoclonal antibodies were the first choices, respectively, for 36.3% and 54% of professionals. The first follow-up appointment should occur within 4 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Further guidelines based on evidence as well as expert opinions should be developed for the Brazilian reality, and future prospective studies can be conducted to compare the effects of different treatment regimens for MOH.</p>","PeriodicalId":73097,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":"7 ","pages":"1712373"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12886480/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146167895","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-26eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2026.1725798
Dan Li, Xing Jin, Jingyu Li, Meige Li, Shuaichen Jin, Wenzhe Jin
Background: Cervicogenic headache (CEH) is often refractory to monotherapies, and treatment strategies combining neuromodulation and myofascial interventions may offer additional benefits. This study evaluated the clinical effectiveness of ultrasound-guided C2 dorsal root ganglion (DRG) pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) combined with suboccipital myofascial plane block (SMPB) in subjects with CEH.
Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 67 CEH subjects treated with PRF alone (n = 28) or combined PRF + SMPB therapy (n = 39). Pain intensity (VAS), headache frequency and duration, Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), and Neck Disability Index (NDI) were assessed at baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months.
Results: The combined treatment produced significantly greater improvement in pain outcomes. At 3 months, VAS scores were 2.09 ± 1.38 in the PRF + SMPB group vs. 3.55 ± 1.11 in the PRF group (between-group difference Δ = -1.46; 95% CI -2.06 to -0.86; p < 0.001). Superior improvements were also observed in headache frequency, headache duration, SF-MPQ, and NDI at multiple timepoints. All subjects completed follow-up (attrition rate 0%), and no complications or minor adverse events were reported.
Conclusions: Ultrasound-guided C2 DRG PRF combined with SMPB demonstrated greater reductions in pain and disability than PRF alone in CEH. These findings provide preliminary, hypothesis-generating evidence supporting the feasibility and clinical utility of this multimodal approach. Prospective randomized trials with longer follow-up are warranted.
{"title":"Combined ultrasound-guided C2 DRG pulsed radiofrequency and suboccipital myofascial plane block for cervicogenic headache: a retrospective study.","authors":"Dan Li, Xing Jin, Jingyu Li, Meige Li, Shuaichen Jin, Wenzhe Jin","doi":"10.3389/fpain.2026.1725798","DOIUrl":"10.3389/fpain.2026.1725798","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cervicogenic headache (CEH) is often refractory to monotherapies, and treatment strategies combining neuromodulation and myofascial interventions may offer additional benefits. This study evaluated the clinical effectiveness of ultrasound-guided C2 dorsal root ganglion (DRG) pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) combined with suboccipital myofascial plane block (SMPB) in subjects with CEH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed 67 CEH subjects treated with PRF alone (<i>n</i> = 28) or combined PRF + SMPB therapy (<i>n</i> = 39). Pain intensity (VAS), headache frequency and duration, Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), and Neck Disability Index (NDI) were assessed at baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The combined treatment produced significantly greater improvement in pain outcomes. At 3 months, VAS scores were 2.09 ± 1.38 in the PRF + SMPB group vs. 3.55 ± 1.11 in the PRF group (between-group difference Δ = -1.46; 95% CI -2.06 to -0.86; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Superior improvements were also observed in headache frequency, headache duration, SF-MPQ, and NDI at multiple timepoints. All subjects completed follow-up (attrition rate 0%), and no complications or minor adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ultrasound-guided C2 DRG PRF combined with SMPB demonstrated greater reductions in pain and disability than PRF alone in CEH. These findings provide preliminary, hypothesis-generating evidence supporting the feasibility and clinical utility of this multimodal approach. Prospective randomized trials with longer follow-up are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":73097,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":"7 ","pages":"1725798"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12883813/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146159490","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-20eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2025.1675821
Shahar Almog, Michelle Weiner, Jessica N Howarth, Jenelle Becerra, Jacobo D Fux, Meredith S Berry
Chronic pain is an individual experience with physical and psychological dimensions. Ketamine is used in sub-anesthetic doses to treat chronic pain. We describe a proposed multidisciplinary approach with combined treatment of low-dose ketamine and pain-focused psychological and somatic therapies to benefit quality of life of disabled chronic pain patients. Beyond pain reduction, within the biopsychosocial approach, the treatment aims to achieve reduced suffering and improved pain management, functionality, and quality of life. Adopting a multidisciplinary approach can minimize exposure to ketamine and maintain a conservative ketamine dosing regimen. In this way, ketamine is not only used for the analgesic effects, but also to facilitate internal psychological processes of body-mind integration related to the pain identity and trauma. We illustrate the presented treatment approach with three cases of patients treated in a private clinic in Florida, United States. We describe the patients' original injury, ketamine and adjunct psychological and somatic therapies regimen, and short and longer-term outcomes from the patient's perspective. These results are preliminary, require replication with validated measures, and represent an opportunity for additional research and hypothesis formation. More clinical research on ketamine and adjunct therapies for chronic pain conditions is warranted to advance treatment options.
{"title":"Treating chronic pain with low dose ketamine and adjunct therapies within a biopsychosocial approach: a case series.","authors":"Shahar Almog, Michelle Weiner, Jessica N Howarth, Jenelle Becerra, Jacobo D Fux, Meredith S Berry","doi":"10.3389/fpain.2025.1675821","DOIUrl":"10.3389/fpain.2025.1675821","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic pain is an individual experience with physical and psychological dimensions. Ketamine is used in sub-anesthetic doses to treat chronic pain. We describe a proposed multidisciplinary approach with combined treatment of low-dose ketamine and pain-focused psychological and somatic therapies to benefit quality of life of disabled chronic pain patients. Beyond pain reduction, within the biopsychosocial approach, the treatment aims to achieve reduced suffering and improved pain management, functionality, and quality of life. Adopting a multidisciplinary approach can minimize exposure to ketamine and maintain a conservative ketamine dosing regimen. In this way, ketamine is not only used for the analgesic effects, but also to facilitate internal psychological processes of body-mind integration related to the pain identity and trauma. We illustrate the presented treatment approach with three cases of patients treated in a private clinic in Florida, United States. We describe the patients' original injury, ketamine and adjunct psychological and somatic therapies regimen, and short and longer-term outcomes from the patient's perspective. These results are preliminary, require replication with validated measures, and represent an opportunity for additional research and hypothesis formation. More clinical research on ketamine and adjunct therapies for chronic pain conditions is warranted to advance treatment options.</p>","PeriodicalId":73097,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":"6 ","pages":"1675821"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12864412/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146121398","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-15eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2025.1723124
Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur
Neuropathic pain is defined as pain caused by a lesion or disease of the somatosensory nervous system. Current algorithms for neuropathic pain diagnosis include patient history, clinical examination, and complementary tests to confirm a lesion or disease of the somatosensory nervous system, able to change the diagnosis of neuropathic pain from probable to definite. These tests include clinical neurophysiology, such as pain-related evoked potentials, quantitative sensory testing, skin biopsy to measure intraepidermal nerve fiber density, or magnetic resonance imaging. However, these tests are especially relevant to demonstrate a structural lesion of the somatosensory system leading to sensory deficit, but they cannot establish a causal link between nervous lesion and the presence of pain. Similar lesions of the somatosensory nervous system may be accompanied by pain or not, while neuropathic pain can be a matter of sensitization or hyperexcitability of somatosensory structures without overt structural lesion. Even the existence of hyperexcitability of nociceptive pathways, revealed by neurophysiological or genetic tests, may contribute to the emergence of pain, but may not be sufficient to affirm that this results in ongoing neuropathic pain. Thus, various complementary tests can be useful to identify a lesion of the somatosensory nervous system, but not to confirm the presence of associated neuropathic pain. Clinical assessment, considering disease history, symptom descriptors and a plausible neuroanatomical distribution, remains the cornerstone of the diagnosis of neuropathic pain, while paraclinical findings must be interpreted with caution in this regard.
{"title":"The intrinsic reason why complementary tests (clinical neurophysiology, neuroimaging, skin biopsy) cannot establish the diagnosis of neuropathic pain.","authors":"Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur","doi":"10.3389/fpain.2025.1723124","DOIUrl":"10.3389/fpain.2025.1723124","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neuropathic pain is defined as pain caused by a lesion or disease of the somatosensory nervous system. Current algorithms for neuropathic pain diagnosis include patient history, clinical examination, and complementary tests to confirm a lesion or disease of the somatosensory nervous system, able to change the diagnosis of neuropathic pain from probable to definite. These tests include clinical neurophysiology, such as pain-related evoked potentials, quantitative sensory testing, skin biopsy to measure intraepidermal nerve fiber density, or magnetic resonance imaging. However, these tests are especially relevant to demonstrate a structural lesion of the somatosensory system leading to sensory deficit, but they cannot establish a causal link between nervous lesion and the presence of pain. Similar lesions of the somatosensory nervous system may be accompanied by pain or not, while neuropathic pain can be a matter of sensitization or hyperexcitability of somatosensory structures without overt structural lesion. Even the existence of hyperexcitability of nociceptive pathways, revealed by neurophysiological or genetic tests, may contribute to the emergence of pain, but may not be sufficient to affirm that this results in ongoing neuropathic pain. Thus, various complementary tests can be useful to identify a lesion of the somatosensory nervous system, but not to confirm the presence of associated neuropathic pain. Clinical assessment, considering disease history, symptom descriptors and a plausible neuroanatomical distribution, remains the cornerstone of the diagnosis of neuropathic pain, while paraclinical findings must be interpreted with caution in this regard.</p>","PeriodicalId":73097,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":"6 ","pages":"1723124"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12852430/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146108605","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-15eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2025.1704444
Jean Li, Jeremiah D Deng, Divya Adhia, Matthew Hall, Ramakrishnan Mani, Dirk De Ridder
Introduction: We present connectivity-based features associated with fibromyalgia, derived from raw EEG data at the sensor level.
Methods: These connectivity features were identified through a data-driven method, employing machine learning. We carried out some automatic, moderate pre-processing and extracted spectral connectivity features. Machine learning experiments then followed, employing feature importance analyses and feature selection techniques for building high-performing classification models; finally, based on robust cross-validation and test evaluation, we obtained the features associated with fibromyalgia. The raw EEG signals from 463 participants are used in the primary analysis. An external dataset that consists of 48 participants is used to validate the identified connectivity features.
Results: Five features in the gamma band (Fz-Cz, Pz-P4, Fz-C3, Cz-P4, and Cz-Pz) were able to objectively detect the presence or absence of fibromyalgia with an accuracy of 99.57%. The identified connectivity features associated with fibromyalgia also show promising results on EEGs that are collected using a different type of device.
Discussion: EEG-based functional connectivity features associated with fibromyalgia, identified using machine learning in the gamma band at the sensor level, can distinguish between fibromyalgia participants and healthy controls with 99.57% accuracy. These findings advance our understanding of the brain-based mechanisms of fibromyalgia and provide novel targets for future non-invasive neuromodulation and neurofeedback trials. However, future studies need to replicate these findings in independent EEG datasets in people with fibromyalgia as well as compare with other clinical populations.
{"title":"EEG connectivity features associated with fibromyalgia revealed by machine learning.","authors":"Jean Li, Jeremiah D Deng, Divya Adhia, Matthew Hall, Ramakrishnan Mani, Dirk De Ridder","doi":"10.3389/fpain.2025.1704444","DOIUrl":"10.3389/fpain.2025.1704444","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We present connectivity-based features associated with fibromyalgia, derived from raw EEG data at the sensor level.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>These connectivity features were identified through a data-driven method, employing machine learning. We carried out some automatic, moderate pre-processing and extracted spectral connectivity features. Machine learning experiments then followed, employing feature importance analyses and feature selection techniques for building high-performing classification models; finally, based on robust cross-validation and test evaluation, we obtained the features associated with fibromyalgia. The raw EEG signals from 463 participants are used in the primary analysis. An external dataset that consists of 48 participants is used to validate the identified connectivity features.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five features in the gamma band (Fz-Cz, Pz-P4, Fz-C3, Cz-P4, and Cz-Pz) were able to objectively detect the presence or absence of fibromyalgia with an accuracy of 99.57%. The identified connectivity features associated with fibromyalgia also show promising results on EEGs that are collected using a different type of device.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>EEG-based functional connectivity features associated with fibromyalgia, identified using machine learning in the gamma band at the sensor level, can distinguish between fibromyalgia participants and healthy controls with 99.57% accuracy. These findings advance our understanding of the brain-based mechanisms of fibromyalgia and provide novel targets for future non-invasive neuromodulation and neurofeedback trials. However, future studies need to replicate these findings in independent EEG datasets in people with fibromyalgia as well as compare with other clinical populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":73097,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":"6 ","pages":"1704444"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12852373/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146108589","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-14eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2025.1653859
Rebecca Stewing, Thomas Forkmann, Elisabeth Vögtle, Franziska Harms, Antonia Barke
Background: Research has shown substantial evidence for the effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions in the management of chronic pain. Less evidence is available whether a one-time mindfulness intervention may also be helpful in alleviating acute procedural pain. While anticipating a potentially painful procedure, people may worry about the upcoming pain. We investigated whether the time spent in a waiting room prior to an appointment could be used for a brief mindfulness intervention.
Methods: The sample consisted of 93 female students. Experimental pain was induced with a pressure pain algometer. Subjective pain ratings were recorded with a numerical rating scale in a 3 × 2 mixed design with the factors condition (mindfulness, worry, control) and measurement time (baseline, post). A situation corresponding to a waiting room in primary care was created. Participants received an audio recording of a mindfulness meditation, a worry instruction, or an instruction to wait. In addition, participants answered the state version of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (State) at both measurement times.
Results: 3 × 2 mixed-design ANOVA showed no main effect for the within-subjects factor "measurement time" F(1, 89) = 0.11, p = .74, no main effect for the between-subjects factor "condition" F(2, 89) = .24; p = .98, and no interaction effect of "measurement time×condition" F(2, 89) = 2.53, p = .09. Analyses showed that worrying led to an increase in perceived pain intensity [t(31) = 1.74, p = .046 (one-tailed), d = 0.31]. No further effects were observed. State mindfulness in the mindfulness condition increased between the measurement times [t(29) = 2.00, p = .03 (one-tailed), d = 0.37].
Discussion: Mindfulness increased through the induction; it did not affect perceived pain intensity. In the worry condition, perceived pain intensity increased, which is in accordance with research on detrimental effects of worry. Regarding the aim of the study, the experiment showed that a one-shot mindfulness intervention was able to promote state mindfulness, but not decrease perceived pain intensity. Future research should investigate whether mindfulness has more impact on the affective component of the pain, rather than on its sensory component.
背景:研究已经证明了正念干预治疗慢性疼痛的有效性。关于一次性正念干预是否也有助于减轻急性程序性疼痛的证据较少。在预期可能会有疼痛的手术时,人们可能会担心即将到来的疼痛。我们调查了预约前在候诊室的时间是否可以用于短暂的正念干预。方法:调查对象为93名女大学生。用压力疼痛计诱导实验性疼痛。主观疼痛评分采用3 × 2混合设计的数值评定量表,包括因素状态(正念、忧虑、控制)和测量时间(基线、后)。创建了一种与初级保健候诊室相对应的情况。参与者收到了正念冥想、担忧指示或等待指示的录音。此外,参与者在两个测量时间都回答了正念注意意识量表(状态)的状态版本。结果:3 × 2混合设计方差分析显示受试者内因子“测量时间”无主效应F(1,89) = 0.11, p =。74、受试者间因子“条件”无主效应F(2,89) = .24;p =。98,“测量time×condition”无交互效应F(2,89) = 2.53, p = 0.09。分析显示,焦虑导致感知疼痛强度的增加[t(31) = 1.74, p = 0.046](单尾),d = 0.31]。没有观察到进一步的影响。正念条件下的状态正念在测量次数之间有所增加[t(29) = 2.00, p = 0.03](单尾),d = 0.37]。讨论:正念通过归纳增强;它不影响感知疼痛强度。在焦虑状态下,感知疼痛强度增加,这与担忧的有害影响研究一致。关于研究的目的,实验表明,一次性正念干预能够促进正念状态,但不能降低感知疼痛强度。未来的研究应该调查正念是否对疼痛的情感成分有更大的影响,而不是对疼痛的感觉成分。
{"title":"Waiting for pain: effect of a mindfulness intervention during a wait situation on pain intensity.","authors":"Rebecca Stewing, Thomas Forkmann, Elisabeth Vögtle, Franziska Harms, Antonia Barke","doi":"10.3389/fpain.2025.1653859","DOIUrl":"10.3389/fpain.2025.1653859","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research has shown substantial evidence for the effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions in the management of chronic pain. Less evidence is available whether a one-time mindfulness intervention may also be helpful in alleviating acute procedural pain. While anticipating a potentially painful procedure, people may worry about the upcoming pain. We investigated whether the time spent in a waiting room prior to an appointment could be used for a brief mindfulness intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sample consisted of 93 female students. Experimental pain was induced with a pressure pain algometer. Subjective pain ratings were recorded with a numerical rating scale in a 3 × 2 mixed design with the factors condition (mindfulness, worry, control) and measurement time (baseline, post). A situation corresponding to a waiting room in primary care was created. Participants received an audio recording of a mindfulness meditation, a worry instruction, or an instruction to wait. In addition, participants answered the state version of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (State) at both measurement times.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>3 × 2 mixed-design ANOVA showed no main effect for the within-subjects factor \"measurement time\" <i>F</i>(1, 89) = 0.11, <i>p</i> = .74, no main effect for the between-subjects factor \"condition\" <i>F</i>(2, 89) = .24; <i>p</i> = .98, and no interaction effect of \"measurement time×condition\" <i>F</i>(2, 89) = 2.53, <i>p</i> = .09. Analyses showed that worrying led to an increase in perceived pain intensity [<i>t</i>(31) = 1.74, <i>p</i> = .046 (one-tailed), <i>d</i> = 0.31]. No further effects were observed. State mindfulness in the mindfulness condition increased between the measurement times [<i>t</i>(29) = 2.00, <i>p</i> = .03 (one-tailed), <i>d</i> = 0.37].</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Mindfulness increased through the induction; it did not affect perceived pain intensity. In the worry condition, perceived pain intensity increased, which is in accordance with research on detrimental effects of worry. Regarding the aim of the study, the experiment showed that a one-shot mindfulness intervention was able to promote state mindfulness, but not decrease perceived pain intensity. Future research should investigate whether mindfulness has more impact on the affective component of the pain, rather than on its sensory component.</p>","PeriodicalId":73097,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":"6 ","pages":"1653859"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12847409/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146088325","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-13eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2025.1658523
Víctor Fernández-Dueñas, Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells, Jennifer Grau-Sánchez
{"title":"The therapeutic use of music for chronic pain: a psychological and neurobiological perspective.","authors":"Víctor Fernández-Dueñas, Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells, Jennifer Grau-Sánchez","doi":"10.3389/fpain.2025.1658523","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2025.1658523","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73097,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":"6 ","pages":"1658523"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12836381/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146095045","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}