首页 > 最新文献

JMIR dermatology最新文献

英文 中文
Perception, Quality, and Accuracy of Sunscreen Content on TikTok: SkinMedia Cross-Sectional Content Analysis. TikTok上防晒霜内容的感知、质量和准确性:SkinMedia横断面内容分析。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.2196/70010
Jaclyn Roland-McGowan, Kyra Diehl, Tayler Tobey, Autumn Shafer, Paige Clement, Oliver J Wisco, Alex G Ortega-Loayza, Sancy Leachman

Background: TikTok, with more than 2 billion users worldwide, has become an influential venue for health information, including dermatologic advice. However, concerns remain about the accuracy and impact of sunscreen-related content.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the quality, accuracy, and themes of popular TikTok videos about sunscreen; evaluate associations with creator credentials and promotional content; and identify implications for public health.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional content analysis of the 100 most-liked English-language TikTok videos generated by the search term "sunscreen." Metadata, creator characteristics, Global Quality Score (GQS), accuracy, attitudes, promotional disclosures, and reference use were extracted using a structured codebook. Thematic and statistical analyses (ie, Pearson correlations, χ2, 2-tailed t tests, and ANOVA) were conducted, with significance defined as P<.05.

Results: Of the top 100 videos, 74 (74%) expressed a positive attitude toward sunscreen, 35 (35%) were accurate, 57 (57%) were opinion based, and 6 (6%) were inaccurate. None of the videos cited references. GQS ratings were low: 40 (40%) videos were rated poor (score=1), 31 (31%) below average (score=2), and only 2 (2%) excellent (score=5). Promotional content appeared in 27 (27%) videos. Accuracy was negatively correlated with likes (r=-0.229; P=.02) and views (r=-0.242; P=.02), while GQS correlated positively with accuracy (r=0.270; P=.007) but not with engagement. Likes and views were strongly correlated (r=0.726; P<.001).

Conclusions: Despite broadly positive sentiment toward sunscreen, misinformation and promotional bias are common in highly engaged TikTok videos, and user engagement is often unrelated to accuracy or educational quality. Dermatologists and public health experts must proactively engage on social platforms to counter misinformation and promote reliable skin health information.

背景:TikTok在全球拥有超过20亿用户,已成为一个有影响力的健康信息平台,包括皮肤病学建议。然而,人们仍然担心防晒霜相关内容的准确性和影响。目的:本研究旨在评估有关防晒霜的热门TikTok视频的质量、准确性和主题;评估与创作者证书和推广内容的关联;并确定对公共卫生的影响。方法:我们对搜索词“防晒霜”生成的100个最受欢迎的英语TikTok视频进行了横断面内容分析。使用结构化代码本提取元数据、创建者特征、全球质量评分(GQS)、准确性、态度、宣传披露和参考使用。进行了主题和统计分析(即Pearson相关性、χ2、双尾t检验和方差分析),显著性定义为结果:在前100个视频中,74个(74%)表达了对防晒霜的积极态度,35个(35%)是准确的,57个(57%)是基于意见的,6个(6%)是不准确的。这些视频都没有引用参考文献。GQS评分较低:40个(40%)视频被评为差(得分=1),31个(31%)视频被评为低于平均水平(得分=2),只有2个(2%)视频被评为优秀(得分=5)。促销内容出现在27个(27%)视频中。准确率与点赞数(r=-0.229; P= 0.02)和浏览量(r=-0.242; P= 0.02)呈负相关,而GQS与准确率(r=0.270; P= 0.07)呈正相关,但与参与度无关。结论:尽管人们对防晒霜普遍持积极态度,但在高参与度的TikTok视频中,错误信息和宣传偏见很常见,用户参与度往往与准确性或教育质量无关。皮肤科医生和公共卫生专家必须积极参与社交平台,以反击错误信息,并推广可靠的皮肤健康信息。
{"title":"Perception, Quality, and Accuracy of Sunscreen Content on TikTok: SkinMedia Cross-Sectional Content Analysis.","authors":"Jaclyn Roland-McGowan, Kyra Diehl, Tayler Tobey, Autumn Shafer, Paige Clement, Oliver J Wisco, Alex G Ortega-Loayza, Sancy Leachman","doi":"10.2196/70010","DOIUrl":"10.2196/70010","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>TikTok, with more than 2 billion users worldwide, has become an influential venue for health information, including dermatologic advice. However, concerns remain about the accuracy and impact of sunscreen-related content.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the quality, accuracy, and themes of popular TikTok videos about sunscreen; evaluate associations with creator credentials and promotional content; and identify implications for public health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional content analysis of the 100 most-liked English-language TikTok videos generated by the search term \"sunscreen.\" Metadata, creator characteristics, Global Quality Score (GQS), accuracy, attitudes, promotional disclosures, and reference use were extracted using a structured codebook. Thematic and statistical analyses (ie, Pearson correlations, χ2, 2-tailed t tests, and ANOVA) were conducted, with significance defined as P<.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the top 100 videos, 74 (74%) expressed a positive attitude toward sunscreen, 35 (35%) were accurate, 57 (57%) were opinion based, and 6 (6%) were inaccurate. None of the videos cited references. GQS ratings were low: 40 (40%) videos were rated poor (score=1), 31 (31%) below average (score=2), and only 2 (2%) excellent (score=5). Promotional content appeared in 27 (27%) videos. Accuracy was negatively correlated with likes (r=-0.229; P=.02) and views (r=-0.242; P=.02), while GQS correlated positively with accuracy (r=0.270; P=.007) but not with engagement. Likes and views were strongly correlated (r=0.726; P<.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite broadly positive sentiment toward sunscreen, misinformation and promotional bias are common in highly engaged TikTok videos, and user engagement is often unrelated to accuracy or educational quality. Dermatologists and public health experts must proactively engage on social platforms to counter misinformation and promote reliable skin health information.</p>","PeriodicalId":73553,"journal":{"name":"JMIR dermatology","volume":"8 ","pages":"e70010"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12670045/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145656470","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of755-nm Alexandrite Laser for Axillary Hair Removal: ِA Comparative Analysis of Single vs. DualFlash lamp Systems. 755 nm紫翠石激光腋毛脱毛的长期疗效和安全性:ِA单闪光灯与双闪光灯系统的比较分析。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-11-21 DOI: 10.2196/76523
Kawthar Shurrab, Manal Asad Nassr

Background: Laser hair removal is a noninvasive cosmetic procedure that targets melanin in hair follicles through selective photothermolysis.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of the 755-nm alexandrite laser for axillary hair removal by comparing single- and dual-flash lamp systems.

Methods: In total, 40 women aged 20 to 35 years with Fitzpatrick skin types II and III participated in a study on laser hair removal for their axillae. Participants underwent 3 treatment sessions, each spaced 4 weeks apart, from January to April 2024. They were divided into 2 groups, both receiving treatments with an alexandrite laser (755 nm, 14 mm spot size). The first group was treated with a dose of 8 J/cm² using a single-flash lamp device operating at 5 Hz, with a pulse duration of 10 ms. The second group received doses between 9 and 11 J/cm² from a dual-flash lamp device operating at 2.5 Hz, with pulse durations ranging from 10 to 15 ms. Photographs and hair counts were taken at baseline and 1 month after the final session. A 2-tailed t test was used to assess statistical significance, and regression analysis evaluated treatment effects. Pain scores and side effects were assessed using a visual analog scale in a satisfaction questionnaire.

Results: The dual-flash lamp laser achieved an overall hair reduction of 94%, while the single-flash lamp laser resulted in a 91% reduction in the axilla. The difference was not statistically significant (P=.14). No serious adverse effects were reported with either device, indicating effective safety features.

Conclusions: The outcomes show that both systems provide similar results in terms of efficacy and safety, with no reported side effects, and results were maintained even after 6 and 12 months of follow-up.

背景:激光脱毛是一种非侵入性美容手术,通过选择性光热分解针对毛囊中的黑色素。目的:通过对比单闪光灯和双闪光灯系统,评价755 nm翠绿宝石激光治疗腋毛脱毛的长期疗效和安全性。方法:对40例20 ~ 35岁Fitzpatrick皮肤II型和III型的女性进行腋窝激光脱毛的研究。2024年1月至4月,参与者接受了3次治疗,每次间隔4周。随机分为2组,均采用绿翠石激光(755 nm,光斑尺寸14 mm)处理。第一组使用5 Hz单闪灯装置,脉冲持续时间为10 ms,剂量为8 J/cm²。第二组接受的剂量为9至11 J/cm²,来自2.5 Hz的双闪光灯装置,脉冲持续时间为10至15 ms。在基线和最后一次治疗后1个月拍摄照片和头发计数。采用双尾t检验评价统计学显著性,采用回归分析评价治疗效果。在满意度问卷中使用视觉模拟量表评估疼痛评分和副作用。结果:双闪光灯激光实现了94%的总体毛发减少,而单闪光灯激光导致腋窝减少91%。差异无统计学意义(P= 0.14)。两种设备均未报告严重的不良反应,表明有效的安全特性。结论:结果显示两种系统在疗效和安全性方面提供相似的结果,未报告副作用,并且即使在6个月和12个月的随访后结果仍保持不变。
{"title":"Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of755-nm Alexandrite Laser for Axillary Hair Removal: ِA Comparative Analysis of Single vs. DualFlash lamp Systems.","authors":"Kawthar Shurrab, Manal Asad Nassr","doi":"10.2196/76523","DOIUrl":"10.2196/76523","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laser hair removal is a noninvasive cosmetic procedure that targets melanin in hair follicles through selective photothermolysis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of the 755-nm alexandrite laser for axillary hair removal by comparing single- and dual-flash lamp systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 40 women aged 20 to 35 years with Fitzpatrick skin types II and III participated in a study on laser hair removal for their axillae. Participants underwent 3 treatment sessions, each spaced 4 weeks apart, from January to April 2024. They were divided into 2 groups, both receiving treatments with an alexandrite laser (755 nm, 14 mm spot size). The first group was treated with a dose of 8 J/cm² using a single-flash lamp device operating at 5 Hz, with a pulse duration of 10 ms. The second group received doses between 9 and 11 J/cm² from a dual-flash lamp device operating at 2.5 Hz, with pulse durations ranging from 10 to 15 ms. Photographs and hair counts were taken at baseline and 1 month after the final session. A 2-tailed t test was used to assess statistical significance, and regression analysis evaluated treatment effects. Pain scores and side effects were assessed using a visual analog scale in a satisfaction questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The dual-flash lamp laser achieved an overall hair reduction of 94%, while the single-flash lamp laser resulted in a 91% reduction in the axilla. The difference was not statistically significant (P=.14). No serious adverse effects were reported with either device, indicating effective safety features.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The outcomes show that both systems provide similar results in terms of efficacy and safety, with no reported side effects, and results were maintained even after 6 and 12 months of follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":73553,"journal":{"name":"JMIR dermatology","volume":"8 ","pages":"e76523"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12638035/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145574995","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Trichoscopic Differentiation in Alopecia: Retrospective Case Series Comparing Lichen Planopilaris, Discoid Lupus Erythematosus, and Alopecia Areata. 斑秃的毛镜鉴别:比较扁平苔藓、盘状红斑狼疮和斑秃的回顾性病例系列。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-11-20 DOI: 10.2196/83463
Gökhan Kaya

Unlabelled: This single-center retrospective case series included 28 patients with alopecia (7 with lichen planopilaris, 7 with discoid lupus erythematosus, and 14 with alopecia areata). Trichoscopic markers were systematically compared across groups. Exclamation-mark hairs and yellow dots were characteristic of alopecia areata, whereas follicular ostia loss and white scarring were confined to lichen planopilaris/discoid lupus erythematosus, providing a simple and practical distinction between nonscarring and scarring alopecias in routine practice.

未标记:该单中心回顾性病例系列包括28例脱发患者(7例为扁平秃苔,7例为盘状红斑狼疮,14例为斑秃)。系统比较各组间的毛镜标记物。斑秃是斑秃的特征,而毛囊开口缺失和白色瘢痕仅限于扁平苔藓/盘状红斑狼疮,这在常规实践中为非瘢痕性脱发和瘢痕性脱发提供了简单而实用的区分。
{"title":"Trichoscopic Differentiation in Alopecia: Retrospective Case Series Comparing Lichen Planopilaris, Discoid Lupus Erythematosus, and Alopecia Areata.","authors":"Gökhan Kaya","doi":"10.2196/83463","DOIUrl":"10.2196/83463","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>This single-center retrospective case series included 28 patients with alopecia (7 with lichen planopilaris, 7 with discoid lupus erythematosus, and 14 with alopecia areata). Trichoscopic markers were systematically compared across groups. Exclamation-mark hairs and yellow dots were characteristic of alopecia areata, whereas follicular ostia loss and white scarring were confined to lichen planopilaris/discoid lupus erythematosus, providing a simple and practical distinction between nonscarring and scarring alopecias in routine practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":73553,"journal":{"name":"JMIR dermatology","volume":"8 ","pages":"e83463"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12634004/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145566547","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Teledermatology to Support Self-Care in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria. 远程皮肤科支持慢性自发性荨麻疹患者的自我护理。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-11-13 DOI: 10.2196/81830
Laura Schuehlein, Martin Peters, Graham Jones

Unlabelled: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is an autoimmune prompted skin disorder, whose hallmarks include the unpredictable onset of hives and itch. Symptom duration typically exceed 6 weeks, and flares can occur for up to 5 years or longer if untreated, impacting potentially any area of the body. The absence of obvious triggers and the variation in onset frequency often delays formal diagnosis which on average is approximately 2 years from first presentation. Initial standard of care is the use of low through to higher strength antihistamines in the first instance, with eventual escalation to prescription anti-inflammatory agents and potentially biologics once patients are under managed care. The societal impacts of delays in diagnosis are marked, with data suggesting CSU impacts up to 1% of the population, primarily of working age and with twice the prevalence in women. Herein, we advocate for the deployment of smartphone imaging and generative artificial intelligence technology to improve detection and early management of CSU through integrated self-care approaches. Such approaches embodying the tenets of P4 personalized medicine could have sustained impact on the disease through awareness campaigns, reducing the burden on the dermatology community and facilitating earlier access to curative therapeutic interventions.

未标记:慢性自发性荨麻疹(CSU)是一种自身免疫性皮肤病,其特征包括不可预测的荨麻疹和瘙痒。症状持续时间通常超过6周,如果不治疗,发作可长达5年或更长时间,可能影响身体的任何部位。缺乏明显的诱因和发病频率的变化往往延迟正式诊断,从首次出现平均约2年。最初的治疗标准是首先使用从低到高强度的抗组胺药,一旦患者接受管理治疗,最终升级为处方抗炎药和潜在的生物制剂。诊断延误的社会影响是明显的,数据表明,CSU影响人口的1%,主要是工作年龄,妇女患病率是其两倍。在此,我们提倡部署智能手机成像和生成人工智能技术,通过综合自我护理方法改善CSU的检测和早期管理。这种体现P4个性化医疗原则的方法可以通过提高认识运动、减轻皮肤病界的负担和促进尽早获得治愈性治疗干预措施,对该疾病产生持续影响。
{"title":"Teledermatology to Support Self-Care in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria.","authors":"Laura Schuehlein, Martin Peters, Graham Jones","doi":"10.2196/81830","DOIUrl":"10.2196/81830","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is an autoimmune prompted skin disorder, whose hallmarks include the unpredictable onset of hives and itch. Symptom duration typically exceed 6 weeks, and flares can occur for up to 5 years or longer if untreated, impacting potentially any area of the body. The absence of obvious triggers and the variation in onset frequency often delays formal diagnosis which on average is approximately 2 years from first presentation. Initial standard of care is the use of low through to higher strength antihistamines in the first instance, with eventual escalation to prescription anti-inflammatory agents and potentially biologics once patients are under managed care. The societal impacts of delays in diagnosis are marked, with data suggesting CSU impacts up to 1% of the population, primarily of working age and with twice the prevalence in women. Herein, we advocate for the deployment of smartphone imaging and generative artificial intelligence technology to improve detection and early management of CSU through integrated self-care approaches. Such approaches embodying the tenets of P4 personalized medicine could have sustained impact on the disease through awareness campaigns, reducing the burden on the dermatology community and facilitating earlier access to curative therapeutic interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":73553,"journal":{"name":"JMIR dermatology","volume":"8 ","pages":"e81830"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12614395/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145515117","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluating Bias in Social Media Research Using #Sunscreen Content on Instagram Reels. 利用Instagram上的#防晒霜内容评估社交媒体研究中的偏见。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-11-05 DOI: 10.2196/76829
Silvija Milanovic, Chelsea Rosen, Taylor Gray

Unlabelled: This cross-sectional content analysis found that Instagram's hashtag-based reels display consistent dermatologic content regardless of user engagement history, supporting the use of hashtags as an objective and reproducible tool for social media research in dermatology.

未标记:这项横断面内容分析发现,无论用户参与历史如何,Instagram基于标签的视频都显示了一致的皮肤病学内容,支持将标签作为皮肤病学社交媒体研究的客观和可复制工具。
{"title":"Evaluating Bias in Social Media Research Using #Sunscreen Content on Instagram Reels.","authors":"Silvija Milanovic, Chelsea Rosen, Taylor Gray","doi":"10.2196/76829","DOIUrl":"10.2196/76829","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>This cross-sectional content analysis found that Instagram's hashtag-based reels display consistent dermatologic content regardless of user engagement history, supporting the use of hashtags as an objective and reproducible tool for social media research in dermatology.</p>","PeriodicalId":73553,"journal":{"name":"JMIR dermatology","volume":"8 ","pages":"e76829"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12588582/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145453812","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Acral Persistent Papular Mucinosis in the United States: Case Series and Literature Review. 美国肢端持久性丘疹黏液病:病例系列和文献回顾。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-16 DOI: 10.2196/77714
Devin Miller, Rachel Manci, Jay Patel, William Guo, Daniel Lozeau, James Briley

Background: Acral persistent papular mucinosis (APPM) is a localized variant of lichen myxedematosus (LM) characterized by asymptomatic, flesh-colored papules primarily distributed on the hands and forearms. This chronic dermatosis, distinct from generalized mucinosis due to its lack of systemic involvement, remains underreported in medical literature.

Objective: In this study, we present two cases of APPM to the limited pool of documented cases in the United States, highlighting its emerging recognition.

Methods: This is a case series of two patients presenting with asymptomatic papular eruptions on the hands and wrists, consistent with the typical presentation of APPM. Diagnostic confirmation via biopsy revealed focal cutaneous mucinosis. Comprehensive laboratory evaluations, including serum and urine protein electrophoresis, showed no evidence of underlying gammopathy in either patient.

Results: Treatment modalities for APPM are limited and often ineffective. Unlike other forms of LM, APPM features are confined to skin lesions, posing primarily as a cosmetic concern with a favorable prognosis. Accurate diagnosis of this localized LM is crucial to differentiate it from the more severe, generalized form, scleromyxedema, which can have organ involvement and may become fatal. Notably, while spontaneous resolution is reported in LM, including discrete papular mucinosis, APPM typically persists without resolution even after extended follow-up.

Conclusions: These cases underscore the importance of recognizing APPM and advocating for broader awareness and exploration of its clinical variability, etiology, and management strategies. With increasing recognition, the understanding of APPM can be enhanced, paving the way for optimized management and improved outcomes for affected individuals.

背景:肢端持续性丘疹黏液病(APPM)是一种局部变异体黏液性地衣(LM),其特征是无症状的肉色丘疹,主要分布于手部和前臂。由于缺乏全身性累及,这种慢性皮肤病与全身性黏液病不同,在医学文献中仍然报道不足。目的:在本研究中,我们在美国有限的文献中介绍了两例APPM病例,突出了其新兴的认识。方法:这是一个病例系列,两例患者表现为手部和手腕无症状丘疹爆发,符合典型的APPM表现。活检确诊为局灶性皮肤黏液病。综合实验室评估,包括血清和尿蛋白电泳,均未显示两名患者存在潜在的伽玛病。结果:APPM的治疗方式有限且往往无效。与其他形式的LM不同,APPM的特征局限于皮肤病变,主要是一种预后良好的美容问题。这种局部LM的准确诊断对于将其与更严重的全身性硬化黏液性水肿区分开来至关重要,硬化黏液性水肿可累及器官并可能致命。值得注意的是,虽然LM中有自发性消退的报道,包括离散性丘疹黏液病,但APPM通常在长时间随访后仍未消退。结论:这些病例强调了认识APPM的重要性,并倡导更广泛的认识和探索其临床变异性、病因和管理策略。随着认识的增加,对APPM的理解可以加强,为优化管理和改善受影响个体的结果铺平道路。
{"title":"Acral Persistent Papular Mucinosis in the United States: Case Series and Literature Review.","authors":"Devin Miller, Rachel Manci, Jay Patel, William Guo, Daniel Lozeau, James Briley","doi":"10.2196/77714","DOIUrl":"10.2196/77714","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acral persistent papular mucinosis (APPM) is a localized variant of lichen myxedematosus (LM) characterized by asymptomatic, flesh-colored papules primarily distributed on the hands and forearms. This chronic dermatosis, distinct from generalized mucinosis due to its lack of systemic involvement, remains underreported in medical literature.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, we present two cases of APPM to the limited pool of documented cases in the United States, highlighting its emerging recognition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a case series of two patients presenting with asymptomatic papular eruptions on the hands and wrists, consistent with the typical presentation of APPM. Diagnostic confirmation via biopsy revealed focal cutaneous mucinosis. Comprehensive laboratory evaluations, including serum and urine protein electrophoresis, showed no evidence of underlying gammopathy in either patient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Treatment modalities for APPM are limited and often ineffective. Unlike other forms of LM, APPM features are confined to skin lesions, posing primarily as a cosmetic concern with a favorable prognosis. Accurate diagnosis of this localized LM is crucial to differentiate it from the more severe, generalized form, scleromyxedema, which can have organ involvement and may become fatal. Notably, while spontaneous resolution is reported in LM, including discrete papular mucinosis, APPM typically persists without resolution even after extended follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These cases underscore the importance of recognizing APPM and advocating for broader awareness and exploration of its clinical variability, etiology, and management strategies. With increasing recognition, the understanding of APPM can be enhanced, paving the way for optimized management and improved outcomes for affected individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":73553,"journal":{"name":"JMIR dermatology","volume":"8 ","pages":"e77714"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12440319/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145076683","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Use of a Large Language Model as a Dermatology Case Narrator: Exploring the Dynamics of a Chatbot as an Educational Tool in Dermatology. 使用大型语言模型作为皮肤病学案例叙述者:探索聊天机器人作为皮肤病学教育工具的动态。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-16 DOI: 10.2196/72058
Emmanouil Karampinis, Dafni Anastasia Bozi Tzetzi, Georgia Pappa, Dimitra Koumaki, Dimitrios Sgouros, Efstratios Vakirlis, Aikaterini Liakou, Markos Papakonstantis, Marios Papadakis, Dimitrios Mantzaris, Elizabeth Lazaridou, Enzo Errichetti, Cristian Navarrete-Dechent, Angeliki Victoria Roussaki Schulze, Alexandros Katoulis

Unlabelled: A comparison of dermatological cases generated by artificial intelligence (AI) versus those created without AI by medical students revealed that AI-created cases were characterized by detailed case descriptions, analysis of medical history, and clinical examinations, but lacked the depth, clinical relevance, and motivational elements found in non-AI cases, which were shorter, presented clinical dilemmas, and included challenging scenarios that students found more educational and engaging.

未标记的:通过比较由人工智能(AI)生成的皮肤病病例与医学生在没有人工智能的情况下创建的病例,发现人工智能创建的病例的特点是详细的病例描述、病史分析和临床检查,但缺乏非人工智能病例的深度、临床相关性和动机因素,非人工智能病例较短,呈现临床困境,包括具有挑战性的场景,学生认为这些场景更具教育意义和吸引力。
{"title":"Use of a Large Language Model as a Dermatology Case Narrator: Exploring the Dynamics of a Chatbot as an Educational Tool in Dermatology.","authors":"Emmanouil Karampinis, Dafni Anastasia Bozi Tzetzi, Georgia Pappa, Dimitra Koumaki, Dimitrios Sgouros, Efstratios Vakirlis, Aikaterini Liakou, Markos Papakonstantis, Marios Papadakis, Dimitrios Mantzaris, Elizabeth Lazaridou, Enzo Errichetti, Cristian Navarrete-Dechent, Angeliki Victoria Roussaki Schulze, Alexandros Katoulis","doi":"10.2196/72058","DOIUrl":"10.2196/72058","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>A comparison of dermatological cases generated by artificial intelligence (AI) versus those created without AI by medical students revealed that AI-created cases were characterized by detailed case descriptions, analysis of medical history, and clinical examinations, but lacked the depth, clinical relevance, and motivational elements found in non-AI cases, which were shorter, presented clinical dilemmas, and included challenging scenarios that students found more educational and engaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":73553,"journal":{"name":"JMIR dermatology","volume":"8 ","pages":"e72058"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12440318/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145076613","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patient Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence and Telemedicine in Dermatology: Narrative Review. 皮肤科患者对人工智能和远程医疗的看法:叙述综述。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-16 DOI: 10.2196/75454
Charlotte McRae, Ting Dan Zhang, Leslie Donoghue Seeley, Michael Anderson, Laci Turner, Lauren V Graham

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) and telemedicine have significant potential to transform dermatology care delivery, but patient perspectives on these technologies have not been systematically compared.

Objective: This study aimed to examine patient perspectives on AI and telemedicine in dermatology to inform implementation strategies as these technologies increasingly converge in clinical practice.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases between August 2024 and October 2024. We identified 48 papers addressing patient perspectives on AI and telemedicine in dermatology, with none directly comparing patients' views of both technologies.

Results: Several distinct themes emerged regarding patient perspectives on these technologies: willingness to use, perceived benefits and risks, barriers to implementation, and conditions necessary for successful integration. Findings revealed that patients express hesitancy toward AI-based diagnoses that lack dermatologist involvement, while preferences for teledermatology varied by reason for appointment, age, and previous technology exposure. Patients' motivations for implementing AI are connected to its potential for quicker diagnoses and improved triage efficiency. At the same time, telemedicine addresses logistical challenges such as reduced travel time and improved appointment availability. Both technologies were perceived to improve accessibility and diagnostic efficiency, though patients expressed concerns about AI's limited communication abilities and teledermatology's inability to perform physical examinations. Primary adoption barriers for these modalities included technological limitations and trust concerns, with patients emphasizing the need for dermatologist oversight, transparency, and adequate educational resources for successful integration.

Conclusions: The complementary strengths of AI and teledermatology suggest they could mitigate each other's limitations when integrated-AI potentially enhancing teledermatology's diagnostic accuracy, while teledermatology addresses AI's lack of human connection. By thoroughly examining these perspectives, this review may serve as a guide for the patient-centered integration of technology in the future landscape of accessible dermatologic care.

背景:人工智能(AI)和远程医疗具有改变皮肤科护理服务的巨大潜力,但患者对这些技术的看法尚未进行系统比较。目的:本研究旨在研究患者对皮肤病学中人工智能和远程医疗的看法,为这些技术在临床实践中的日益融合提供实施策略。方法:于2024年8月~ 2024年10月,利用PubMed、Scopus和Embase数据库进行综合文献检索。我们确定了48篇关于患者对皮肤病学中人工智能和远程医疗的看法的论文,没有一篇论文直接比较了患者对这两种技术的看法。结果:关于患者对这些技术的看法,出现了几个不同的主题:使用的意愿、可感知的益处和风险、实施的障碍以及成功整合所需的条件。研究结果显示,患者对缺乏皮肤科医生参与的基于人工智能的诊断表现出犹豫,而对远程皮肤科的偏好因预约、年龄和以前的技术接触而异。患者使用人工智能的动机与其更快诊断和提高分诊效率的潜力有关。与此同时,远程医疗解决了后勤方面的挑战,如减少旅行时间和提高预约时间。这两项技术都被认为提高了可及性和诊断效率,尽管患者对人工智能有限的沟通能力和远程皮肤科无法进行身体检查表示担忧。采用这些方法的主要障碍包括技术限制和信任问题,患者强调需要皮肤科医生的监督、透明度和足够的教育资源才能成功整合。结论:人工智能和远程皮肤科的互补优势表明,当集成人工智能可能提高远程皮肤科的诊断准确性时,它们可以缓解彼此的局限性,而远程皮肤科则解决人工智能缺乏人际联系的问题。通过深入研究这些观点,本综述可以作为指导,以患者为中心的整合技术在未来的景观可及的皮肤科护理。
{"title":"Patient Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence and Telemedicine in Dermatology: Narrative Review.","authors":"Charlotte McRae, Ting Dan Zhang, Leslie Donoghue Seeley, Michael Anderson, Laci Turner, Lauren V Graham","doi":"10.2196/75454","DOIUrl":"10.2196/75454","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) and telemedicine have significant potential to transform dermatology care delivery, but patient perspectives on these technologies have not been systematically compared.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to examine patient perspectives on AI and telemedicine in dermatology to inform implementation strategies as these technologies increasingly converge in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases between August 2024 and October 2024. We identified 48 papers addressing patient perspectives on AI and telemedicine in dermatology, with none directly comparing patients' views of both technologies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Several distinct themes emerged regarding patient perspectives on these technologies: willingness to use, perceived benefits and risks, barriers to implementation, and conditions necessary for successful integration. Findings revealed that patients express hesitancy toward AI-based diagnoses that lack dermatologist involvement, while preferences for teledermatology varied by reason for appointment, age, and previous technology exposure. Patients' motivations for implementing AI are connected to its potential for quicker diagnoses and improved triage efficiency. At the same time, telemedicine addresses logistical challenges such as reduced travel time and improved appointment availability. Both technologies were perceived to improve accessibility and diagnostic efficiency, though patients expressed concerns about AI's limited communication abilities and teledermatology's inability to perform physical examinations. Primary adoption barriers for these modalities included technological limitations and trust concerns, with patients emphasizing the need for dermatologist oversight, transparency, and adequate educational resources for successful integration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The complementary strengths of AI and teledermatology suggest they could mitigate each other's limitations when integrated-AI potentially enhancing teledermatology's diagnostic accuracy, while teledermatology addresses AI's lack of human connection. By thoroughly examining these perspectives, this review may serve as a guide for the patient-centered integration of technology in the future landscape of accessible dermatologic care.</p>","PeriodicalId":73553,"journal":{"name":"JMIR dermatology","volume":"8 ","pages":"e75454"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12440257/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145076662","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Characterization of Reddit Posts About Xylazine-Associated Wounds: Qualitative Study. 关于xylazine相关伤口的Reddit帖子的特征:定性研究。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-12 DOI: 10.2196/70329
Anthony Spadaro, JaMor Hairston, Sahithi Lakamana, Rachel Wightman, Jennifer Love, Jeanmarie Perrone, Abeed Sarker

Background: Xylazine has been associated with skin wounds. The rising prevalence of xylazine and its debated role in wound causation have sparked concerns among public health professionals, medical experts, and people who use drugs.

Objective: This study used a qualitative evaluation of Reddit posts to understand the experiences of people who use drugs concerning xylazine-associated wounds.

Methods: This study explored xylazine discussions on Reddit. Data were collected from 930+ drug-related subreddits via the PRAW Python application programming interface, and natural language processing methods were employed to identify posts that mentioned xylazine and wound-related keywords. Retrieved posts were manually coded for thematic analysis, and a term frequency-inverse document frequency analysis was performed per theme to obtain additional insights.

Results: The manual classification of 286 posts revealed predominant themes related to the pathophysiology of xylazine, wound locations on the body, and management strategies. The 3 most frequent xylazine wound-related themes were "Mechanisms of xylazine-associated wounds" (84 posts, 29.4%), "Geographic region" (67, 23.4%), and "Location of wounds on the body" (56, 19.6%). The analysis showed xylazine's presence in the discussions among Reddit's drug-using communities, with a notable focus on wound management and geographic trends. The term frequency-inverse document frequency analysis revealed prominent lexical markers within each theme.

Conclusions: The findings suggest that social media platforms such as Reddit can serve as valuable resources for understanding emerging health issues such as xylazine-associated wounds. The study's findings highlight patterns of use, the characteristics of wounds on people who use drugs, and discussions about wound management. This study adds to a growing body of literature using social media to understand the consequences of emerging drugs on human health.

背景:噻嗪与皮肤创伤有关。氯嗪的流行率不断上升,其在伤口病因中的作用备受争议,这引起了公共卫生专业人员、医学专家和吸毒者的关注。目的:本研究对Reddit帖子进行定性评价,以了解使用氯嗪相关伤口药物的人的经历。方法:本研究对Reddit上关于xylazine的讨论进行了调查。通过PRAW Python应用程序编程接口从930多个药物相关子reddit中收集数据,并采用自然语言处理方法识别涉及xylazine和伤口相关关键词的帖子。检索到的帖子被手动编码以进行主题分析,并且对每个主题执行术语频率逆文档频率分析,以获得更多的见解。结果:286个岗位的人工分类揭示了与二甲肼的病理生理、身体伤口位置和处理策略相关的主要主题。最常见的3个与木嗪相关的主题是“木嗪相关伤口的机制”(84篇,29.4%)、“地理区域”(67篇,23.4%)和“伤口在身体上的位置”(56篇,19.6%)。分析显示,在Reddit吸毒社区的讨论中存在xylazine,并特别关注伤口管理和地理趋势。术语频率逆文档频率分析揭示了每个主题中突出的词汇标记。结论:研究结果表明,Reddit等社交媒体平台可以作为了解新出现的健康问题的宝贵资源,如与木嗪相关的伤口。该研究的发现突出了使用模式、吸毒者伤口的特征以及关于伤口管理的讨论。越来越多的文献利用社交媒体来了解新兴药物对人类健康的影响,这项研究增加了这些文献的数量。
{"title":"Characterization of Reddit Posts About Xylazine-Associated Wounds: Qualitative Study.","authors":"Anthony Spadaro, JaMor Hairston, Sahithi Lakamana, Rachel Wightman, Jennifer Love, Jeanmarie Perrone, Abeed Sarker","doi":"10.2196/70329","DOIUrl":"10.2196/70329","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Xylazine has been associated with skin wounds. The rising prevalence of xylazine and its debated role in wound causation have sparked concerns among public health professionals, medical experts, and people who use drugs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study used a qualitative evaluation of Reddit posts to understand the experiences of people who use drugs concerning xylazine-associated wounds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study explored xylazine discussions on Reddit. Data were collected from 930+ drug-related subreddits via the PRAW Python application programming interface, and natural language processing methods were employed to identify posts that mentioned xylazine and wound-related keywords. Retrieved posts were manually coded for thematic analysis, and a term frequency-inverse document frequency analysis was performed per theme to obtain additional insights.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The manual classification of 286 posts revealed predominant themes related to the pathophysiology of xylazine, wound locations on the body, and management strategies. The 3 most frequent xylazine wound-related themes were \"Mechanisms of xylazine-associated wounds\" (84 posts, 29.4%), \"Geographic region\" (67, 23.4%), and \"Location of wounds on the body\" (56, 19.6%). The analysis showed xylazine's presence in the discussions among Reddit's drug-using communities, with a notable focus on wound management and geographic trends. The term frequency-inverse document frequency analysis revealed prominent lexical markers within each theme.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggest that social media platforms such as Reddit can serve as valuable resources for understanding emerging health issues such as xylazine-associated wounds. The study's findings highlight patterns of use, the characteristics of wounds on people who use drugs, and discussions about wound management. This study adds to a growing body of literature using social media to understand the consequences of emerging drugs on human health.</p>","PeriodicalId":73553,"journal":{"name":"JMIR dermatology","volume":"8 ","pages":"e70329"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12434632/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145056416","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Omission of Risk in Vitamin A-Related Dermatologic Instagram Posts: A Growing Concern in an Unregulated Digital Landscape. 在与维生素A相关的皮肤病Instagram帖子中遗漏风险:在不受监管的数字环境中日益受到关注。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-12 DOI: 10.2196/77504
Robert John Vanaria, Michael Povelaitis, Riya Khokhal, Shannon Meledathu, Claudia Green, Robin Ashinoff, Mariela Mitre

Unlabelled: We reviewed 30 of the top-viewed Instagram videos using the hashtags #retinoid and #retinol to assess reliability using the DISCERN instrument. Dermatologists produced more accurate content than laypeople, though important details such as treatment risks were often omitted. Our findings highlight the need for health professionals to balance accessibility with accuracy to provide trustworthy dermatologic information on social media.

未标记:我们使用#视黄醇和#视黄醇标签审查了30个点击率最高的Instagram视频,使用DISCERN仪器评估可靠性。皮肤科医生比外行人提供更准确的内容,尽管重要的细节,如治疗风险往往被省略。我们的研究结果强调了卫生专业人员需要平衡可访问性和准确性,以便在社交媒体上提供值得信赖的皮肤病学信息。
{"title":"Omission of Risk in Vitamin A-Related Dermatologic Instagram Posts: A Growing Concern in an Unregulated Digital Landscape.","authors":"Robert John Vanaria, Michael Povelaitis, Riya Khokhal, Shannon Meledathu, Claudia Green, Robin Ashinoff, Mariela Mitre","doi":"10.2196/77504","DOIUrl":"10.2196/77504","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>We reviewed 30 of the top-viewed Instagram videos using the hashtags #retinoid and #retinol to assess reliability using the DISCERN instrument. Dermatologists produced more accurate content than laypeople, though important details such as treatment risks were often omitted. Our findings highlight the need for health professionals to balance accessibility with accuracy to provide trustworthy dermatologic information on social media.</p>","PeriodicalId":73553,"journal":{"name":"JMIR dermatology","volume":"8 ","pages":"e77504"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12434146/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145056447","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
JMIR dermatology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1