JMIR infodemiology最新文献

Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major global health issue heavily influenced by human behavior. Effective communication and awareness-raising are crucial in curbing AMR, with social network sites (SNSs) significantly shaping health behaviors. Despite their potential, current analyses of AMR on SNSs have focused mainly on top-down communication initiatives.

Objective: This study aims to examine AMR on Instagram (Meta Platforms), identifying key actors, content themes, and the nature of the communication to understand how AMR is portrayed and perceived.

Methods: Based on the sender-message-channel-receiver model, this study used content analysis to review publicly accessible posts on Instagram. The data refer to 24 months, focusing on the hashtag "#antibioticresistance." After cleaning the data, 610 posts (10% of the total 6105) were analyzed.

Results: Content creators were predominantly information drivers or professionals in science and health. Posts frequently featured text-dominated visuals or images of bacteria and laboratory tests. However, the AMR posts were found to be siloed, with limited engagement beyond specific interest groups. The study highlighted the neutrality and accuracy of the content but noted the challenge of reaching a broader audience.

Conclusions: While Instagram serves as a platform for accurate and informative AMR communication, the post of it remains confined to niche groups, limiting its broader impact. To enhance engagement, AMR discussions should be integrated into more general interest content, use visually compelling formats, and encourage institutional participation and interactive user engagement.

Background: Prevalence and spread of misinformation are a concern for the exacerbation of vaccine hesitancy and a resulting reduction in vaccine intent. However, few studies have focused on how vaccine misinformation diffuses online, who is responsible for the diffusion, and the mechanisms by which that happens. In addition, researchers have rarely investigated this in non-Western contexts particularly vulnerable to misinformation.

Objective: This study aims to identify COVID-19 vaccine misinformation, map its diffusion, and identify the effect of echo chamber users on misinformation diffusion on a Taiwanese online forum.

Methods: The study uses data from a popular forum in Taiwan called PTT. A crawler scraped all threads on the most popular subforum from January 2021 until December 2022. Vaccine-related threads were identified through keyword searching (n=5818). Types of misinformation, including misleading, disinformation, conspiracy, propaganda, and fabricated content, were coded by 2 researchers. Polarity was proposed as a proxy for measuring an individual's level of involvement in the echo chamber, one of the mechanisms responsible for the viral misinformation on social media. Factors related to information diffusion, including misinformation type and polarity, were then assessed with negative binomial regression.

Results: Of 5818 threads, 3830 (65.8%) were identified as true information, and 1601 (27.5%) contained misinformation, yielding 5431 boards for analysis. Misinformation content did not vary much from other contexts. Propaganda-related information was most likely to be reposted (relative risk: 2.07; P<.001) when comparing to true information. However, the more polarized a user was, the less likely his or her content was to be reposted (relative risk: 0.22; P<.001). By removing the nodes with a high level of indegree, outdegree, and betweenness centrality, we found that the core network and the entire network demonstrated a decreasing trend in average polarity score, which showed that influential users contributed to the polarization in misinformation consumption.

Conclusions: Although the forum exhibits a resilience to echo chambering, active users and brokers contribute significantly to the polarization of the community, particularly through propaganda-style misinformation. This popularity of propaganda-style misinformation may be linked to the political nature of the forum, where public opinion follows "elite cues" on issues, as observed in the United States. The work in this study corroborates this finding and contributes a data point in a non-Western context. To manage the echo chambering of misinformation, more effort can be put into moderating these users to prevent polarization and the spread of misinformation to prevent growing vaccine hesitancy.

Background: User demographics are often hidden in social media data due to privacy concerns. However, demographic information on substance use (SU) can provide valuable insights, allowing public health policy makers to focus on specific cohorts and develop efficient prevention strategies, especially during global crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

Objective: This study aimed to analyze SU trends at the user level across different demographic dimensions, such as age, gender, race, and ethnicity, with a focus on the COVID-19 pandemic. The study also establishes a baseline for SU trends using social media data.

Methods: The study was conducted using large-scale English-language data from Twitter (now known as X) over a 3-year period (2019, 2020, and 2021), comprising 1.13 billion posts. Following preprocessing, the SU posts were identified using our custom-trained deep learning model (Robustly Optimized Bidirectional Encoder Representations From Transformers Pretraining Approach [RoBERTa]), which resulted in the identification of 9 million SU posts. Then, demographic attributes, such as user type, age, gender, race, and ethnicity, as well as sentiments and emotions associated with each post, were extracted via a collection of natural language processing modules. Finally, various qualitative analyses were performed to obtain insight into user behaviors based on demographics.

Results: The highest level of user participation in SU discussions was observed in 2020, with a 22.18% increase compared to 2019 and a 25.24% increase compared to 2021. Throughout the study period, male users and teenagers increasingly dominated the SU discussions across all substance types. During the COVID-19 pandemic, user participation in prescription medication discussions was notably higher among female users compared to other substance types. In addition, alcohol use increased by 80% within 2 weeks after the global pandemic declaration in 2020.

Conclusions: This study presents a large-scale, fine-grained analysis of SU on social media data, examining trends by age, gender, race, and ethnicity before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Our findings, contextualized with sociocultural and pandemic-specific factors, provide actionable insights for targeted public health interventions. This study establishes social media data (powered with artificial intelligence and natural language processing tools) as a valuable platform for real-time SU surveillance and prevention during crises.

Background: In recent years, there has been a dramatic increase in the popularity and use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) for weight loss. As such, it is essential to understand users' real-world discussions of short-term, long-term, and co-occurrent adverse events associated with currently used GLP-1 RA medications.

Objective: This study aims to quantitatively analyze temporal and co-occurrent GLP-1 RA adverse event trends through discussions of GLP-1 RA weight loss medications on Facebook from 2022 to 2024.

Methods: We collected 64,202 Facebook posts (59,293 posts after removing duplicate posts) from January 1, 2022, to May 31, 2024, through CrowdTangle, a public insights tool from Meta. Using English language social media posts from the United States, we examined discussions of adverse event mentions for posts referencing 7 GLP-1 RA weight loss product categories (ie, semaglutide, Ozempic, Wegovy, tirzepatide, Mounjaro, Zepbound, and GLP-1 RA as a class). All analyses were conducted using Python (version 3; Python Software Foundation) in a Google Colab environment.

Results: Temporal time series analysis revealed that the GLP-1 RAs' adverse event mentions on social media aligned with several key events: the Food and Drug Administration's approval of Wegovy for pediatric weight management in December 2022, increased media coverage in August 2023, celebrity endorsement in December 2023, and Medicare Part D coverage expansion for weight loss medications in March 2024. Gastrointestinal (GI)-related adverse events (general term) were most prevalent for posts mentioning the GLP-1 RA class (210/4885, 4.30%) and Mounjaro (241/4031, 5.98%). In contrast, the most prevalent adverse event mentions noted for tirzepatide were headache (78/4202, 1.86%) and joint pain (71/4202, 1.69%). Hypertension (13/1769, 0.73%) was frequently mentioned in Zepbound posts, while pancreatitis was commonly associated with Mounjaro posts (44/4031, 1.08%), and 2.85% (139/4885) of posts broadly referring to the GLP-1 RA class. Furthermore, an integrated node network analysis revealed 3 distinct GLP-1 RA adverse events-mentioned clusters: cluster 1 (purple) contained allergies, anxiety, depression, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, fatigue, fever, hypertension, indigestion, insomnia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, hives, swelling, restlessness, and seizures. Cluster 2 (pink) contained constipation, dehydration, headache, diarrhea, dizziness, hypoglycemia, sweating, and jaundice. Cluster 3 (brown) contained GI symptoms, such as nausea, pancreatitis, rash, and vomiting. The GI symptoms, such as nausea, vomiting, pancreatitis, diarrhea, and indigestion, were strongly associated together (≥100 co-occurrence mentions), while the mentioned neurological symptoms, such as anxiety, depression, and insomnia, were highly correlated with each other (50-100 co-occurrence men

Background: Stroke has become a leading cause of death and disability worldwide, resulting in a significant loss of healthy life years and imposing a considerable economic burden on patients, their families, and caregivers. However, despite the growing role of online videos as an emerging source of health information, the credibility and quality of stroke prevention education videos, especially those in Chinese, remain unclear.

Objective: This study aims to assess the basic characteristics, overall quality, and reliability of Chinese-language online videos related to public health education on stroke prevention.

Methods: We systematically searched and screened stroke prevention-related video resources from 4 popular Chinese domestic video platforms (Bilibili, Douyin, Haokan, and Xigua). General information, including upload date, duration, views, likes, comments, and shares, was extracted and recorded. Two validated evaluation tools were used: the modified DISCERN questionnaire to assess content reliability and the Global Quality Scale (GQS) to evaluate overall quality. Finally, Spearman correlation analysis was conducted to examine potential associations between general video metrics and their quality and reliability.

Results: After searching and screening, a total of 313 eligible videos were included for analysis: 68 from Bilibili, 74 from Douyin, 86 from Haokan, and 85 from Xigua. Among these, 113 (36.1%) were created by health care professionals, followed by news agencies (n=95, 30.4%) and general individual users (n=40, 12.8%). The median scores for the modified DISCERN and GQS were 2 and 3, respectively, suggesting that the included stroke prevention-related videos were relatively unreliable and of moderate quality. Most videos focused on primary stroke prevention and commonly recommended adopting a healthy diet; engaging in physical activity; and managing blood pressure, glucose, and lipid levels. Additionally, videos with longer durations and more comments tended to be more reliable and of higher quality. A positive association was also observed between video quality and reliability.

Conclusions: Overall, the quality and reliability of Chinese-language online videos as a source of stroke prevention information remain unsatisfactory and should be approached with caution by viewers. To address this issue, several measures should be implemented, including establishing an online monitoring and correction system, strengthening the video review process through collaboration with health care professionals, and encouraging more selective and cautious sharing of controversial content. These steps are essential to help curb the spread of online misinformation and minimize its ongoing impact.

Background: Abortion access in the United States has been in a state of rapid change and increasing restriction since the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision from the US Supreme Court in June 2022. With further constraints on access to abortion since Dobbs, the internet and online communities are playing an increasingly important role in people's abortion trajectories. There is a need for a broader understanding of how online resources are used for abortion and how they may reflect changes in the sociopolitical and legal context of abortion access. Research using online information and leveraging methods to work efficiently with large textual datasets has the potential to accelerate knowledge generation and provide novel insights into changing abortion-related experiences following Dobbs, helping address these knowledge gaps.

Objective: This project sought to use natural language processing techniques, specifically topic modeling, to explore the content of posts to 1 online community for abortion (r/abortion) in 2022 and assess how community use changed during that time.

Methods: This analysis described and explored posts shared throughout 2022 and for 3 subperiods of interest: before the Dobbs leak (December 24, 2021-May 1, 2022), Dobbs leak to decision (May 2, 2022-June 23, 2022), and after the Dobbs decision (June 24, 2022-December 23, 2022). We used topic modeling to obtain descriptive topics for the year and each subperiod and then classified posts. Topics were then aggregated into conceptual groups based on a combination of quantitative and qualitative assessments. The proportion of posts classified in each conceptual group was used to assess change in community interests across the 3 study subperiods.

Results: The 7273 posts shared in r/abortion in 2022 included in our analyses were categorized into 8 conceptual groups: abortion decision-making, navigating abortion access barriers, clinical abortion care, medication abortion processes, postabortion physical experiences, potential pregnancy, and self-managed abortion processes. Posts related to navigating access barriers were most common. The proportion of posts about abortion decision-making and self-management changed significantly across study periods (P=.006 and P<.001, respectively); abortion decision-making posts were more common before the Dobbs leak, whereas those related to self-management increased following the leak and decision.

Conclusions: This analysis provides a holistic view of r/abortion posts in 2022, highlighting the important role of online communities as abortion-supportive online resources and changing interests among posters with abortion policy changes. As policies and pathways to abortion access continue to change across the United States, approaches leveraging natural language processing with sufficiently large samples of textual data pr

Background: Mental health organizations have the vital and difficult task of shaping public discourse and providing important information. Social media platforms such as X (formerly known as Twitter) serve as such communication channels, and analyzing organizational health information offers valuable insights into their guidance and linguistic patterns, which can enhance communication strategies for health campaigns and interventions. The findings inform strategies to enhance public engagement, trust, and the effectiveness of mental health messaging.

Objective: This study examines the predominant themes and linguistic characteristics of messages from mental health organizations, focusing on how these messages' structure information, engage audiences, and contribute to public information and discourse on mental health.

Methods: A computational content analysis was conducted to identify thematic clusters within messages from 17 unique mental health organizations, totaling 326,967 tweets and approximately 7.2 million words. In addition, Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) was used to analyze affective, social, and cognitive processes in messages with positive versus negative sentiment. Differences in sentiment were assessed using a Mann-Whitney U test.

Results: The analysis revealed that organizations predominantly emphasize themes related to community, well-being, and workplace mental health. Sentiment analysis indicated significant differences in affect (P<.001), social processes (P<.001), and cognitive processing (P<.001) between positive and negative messages, with effect sizes that were small to medium. Notably, while messages frequently conveyed positive sentiment and social engagement, there was a lower emphasis on cognitive processing, suggesting that more complex discussions about mental health challenges may be underrepresented.

Conclusions: Organizations use social media to promote engagement and support, often through positively valanced messages. Yet the limited emphasis on cognitive processing may indicate a gap in how organizations address more nuanced or complex mental health issues. Findings demonstrate the need for communication strategies that balance information with depth and clarity, ensuring that messages are trustworthy, actionable, and responsive to multiple mental health needs. By refining digital messaging strategies, organizations can enhance the effectiveness of health communication and improve engagement with mental health resources.

Background: The outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 in 2019 was accompanied by a rise in the popularity of conspiracy theories. These theories often undermined vaccination efforts. There is evidence that the spread of misinformation about COVID-19 is associated with online social media use. Online social media enables network effects that influence the dissemination of information. It is important to distinguish between the effects of using social media and the network effects that occur within the platform.

Objective: This study aims to investigate the association between the modularity of online social networks and the spread of, as well as attitudes toward, information and misinformation about COVID-19.

Methods: This study used data from the social network structure of the online social media platform Vkontakte (VK) to construct an adjusted modularity index (fragmentation index) for 166 Russian towns. VK is a widely used Russian social media platform. The study combined town-level network indices with data from the poll "Research on COVID-19 in Russia's Regions" (RoCIRR), which included responses from 23,000 individuals. The study measured respondents' knowledge of both fake and true statements about COVID-19, as well as their attitudes toward these statements.

Results: A positive association was observed between town-level fragmentation and individuals' knowledge of fake statements, and a negative association with knowledge of true statements. There is a strong negative association between fragmentation and the average attitude toward true statements (P<.001), while the association with attitudes toward fake statements is positive but statistically insignificant (P=.55). Additionally, a strong association was found between network fragmentation and ideological differences in attitudes toward true versus fake statements.

Conclusions: While social media use plays an important role in the diffusion of health-related information, the structure of social networks can amplify these effects. Social network modularity plays a key role in the spread of information, with differing impacts on true and fake statements. These differences in information dissemination contribute to variations in attitudes toward true and fake statements about COVID-19. Ultimately, fragmentation was associated with individual-level polarization on medical topics. Future research should further explore the interaction between social media use and underlying network effects.

Background: There has been an increase in the prevalence of noncommunicable diseases in Malaysia. This can be prevented and managed through the adoption of healthy lifestyle behaviors, including not smoking, avoiding alcohol consumption, maintaining a balanced diet, and being physically active. The growing importance of using social media to deliver information on healthy behaviors has led health care professionals (HCPs) to lead these efforts. To ensure effective delivery of information on healthy lifestyle behaviors, HCPs should begin by understanding users' current opinions about these behaviors and whether the users are receptive to recommended health practices. Nevertheless, there has been limited research conducted in Malaysia that aims to identify the sentiments and content of posts, as well as how well users' perceptions align with recommended health practices.

Objective: This study aims to examine social media posts related to various lifestyle behaviors, by using a combination of sentiment analysis to analyze users' sentiments and manual content analysis to explore the content of the posts and how well users' perceptions align with recommended health practices.

Methods: Using keywords based on lifestyle behaviors, posts originating from X (formerly known as Twitter) and published in Malaysia between November and December 2022 were scraped for sentiment analysis. Posts with positive and negative sentiments were randomly selected for content analysis. A codebook was developed to code the selected posts according to content and alignment of users' perceptions with recommended health practices.

Results: A total of 3320 posts were selected for sentiment analysis. Significant associations were observed between sentiment class and lifestyle behaviors (χ26=67.64; P<.001), with positive sentiments higher than negative sentiments for all lifestyle behaviors. Findings from content analysis of 1328 posts revealed that most of the posts were about users' narratives (492/1328), general statements (203/1328), and planned actions toward the conduct of their behavior (196/1328). More than half of tobacco-, diet-, and activity-related posts were aligned with recommended health practices, whereas most of the alcohol-related posts were not aligned with recommended health practices (63/112).

Conclusions: As most of the alcohol-related posts did not align with recommended health practices, the findings reflect a need for HCPs to increase their delivery of health information on alcohol consumption. It is also important to ensure the ongoing health promotion of the other 3 lifestyle behaviors on social media, while continuing to monitor the discussions made by social media users.