Pub Date : 2014-12-03DOI: 10.4172/2167-1052.1000170
E. Arzenton, L. Magro, Paon, F. Capra, P. Apostoli, F. Guzzo, A. Conforti, R. Leone
The green tea is obtained by an unfermented process of leaves of Camellia sinensis and the main chemical components are polyphenols, particularly epigallocatechin-3-gallate and epicatechin-3-gallate that could be associated to adverse hepatic reactions. We present a case of acute hepatitis caused by the use of green tea.A 62-year-old woman was hospitalized because of the persistent high levels of liver function tests. After the hospitalization a lot of instrumental exams and blood checks were performed. The search of metallic elements in the used green tea infusions was performed using an inductively coupled-plasma mass spectrometry; high performance liquid chromatography-electro spray ionization-mass spectrometry analysis was done to characterize the metabolite profiles of the infusions of green tea. The blood check showed in particular alanine aminotransferase (780 U/L) and total bilirubin (1.15 mg/dL) levels abnormal. The abdominal echography and other blood parameters were normal, but liver biopsy described a “drug toxic damage”. Every day over the previous 9 months the patient drank two or three cups of several brands of green tea infusions and she stopped this behavior when abdominal pain was persistent. Her medical history didn’t report the use of other drugs or toxic products. After four months of stopping the use of green tea infusions, the liver function tests were normalized. The presence of metallic elements in tea infusion cannot justify the observed liver toxicity in our patient. Instead, the highest levels of epigallo catechin methyl gallate derived from epigallocatechin-3-gallate observed in one of the samples consumed by the patient, arise a possible correlation between some of the catechins in green tea and the hepatotoxic effect. It is conceivable that the mechanism of damage can be idiosyncratic-metabolic or allergic.
{"title":"Acute Hepatitis Caused by Green Tea Infusion: A Case Report","authors":"E. Arzenton, L. Magro, Paon, F. Capra, P. Apostoli, F. Guzzo, A. Conforti, R. Leone","doi":"10.4172/2167-1052.1000170","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-1052.1000170","url":null,"abstract":"The green tea is obtained by an unfermented process of leaves of Camellia sinensis and the main chemical components are polyphenols, particularly epigallocatechin-3-gallate and epicatechin-3-gallate that could be associated to adverse hepatic reactions. We present a case of acute hepatitis caused by the use of green tea.A 62-year-old woman was hospitalized because of the persistent high levels of liver function tests. After the hospitalization a lot of instrumental exams and blood checks were performed. The search of metallic elements in the used green tea infusions was performed using an inductively coupled-plasma mass spectrometry; high performance liquid chromatography-electro spray ionization-mass spectrometry analysis was done to characterize the metabolite profiles of the infusions of green tea. The blood check showed in particular alanine aminotransferase (780 U/L) and total bilirubin (1.15 mg/dL) levels abnormal. The abdominal echography and other blood parameters were normal, but liver biopsy described a “drug toxic damage”. Every day over the previous 9 months the patient drank two or three cups of several brands of green tea infusions and she stopped this behavior when abdominal pain was persistent. Her medical history didn’t report the use of other drugs or toxic products. After four months of stopping the use of green tea infusions, the liver function tests were normalized. The presence of metallic elements in tea infusion cannot justify the observed liver toxicity in our patient. Instead, the highest levels of epigallo catechin methyl gallate derived from epigallocatechin-3-gallate observed in one of the samples consumed by the patient, arise a possible correlation between some of the catechins in green tea and the hepatotoxic effect. It is conceivable that the mechanism of damage can be idiosyncratic-metabolic or allergic.","PeriodicalId":7385,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","volume":"32 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77095642","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2014-12-02DOI: 10.4172/2167-1052.1000E129
Chang Cw, B. Ning
Ensuring drug efficacy and safety are unremitting challenges for drug manufacturers and public health organizations worldwide. It has been estimated that, when all of the drugs in the market used to treat common diseases are considered, only 25% to 60% of patients exhibit the expected pharmacological response [1], while a small portion of patients could develop adverse reactions (ADRs). ADRs are one of the leading causes of illness and death associated with prescription medications, and ADRs are estimated to occur in 6.2-6.7% of all hospitalized patients, resulting in more than 2 million adverse drug reaction cases annually, including approximate 100,000 incidences of death in the United States [2].
{"title":"A Reachable Goal: Application of Pharmacogenomics Biomarkers to ImproveDrug Efficacy and Safety","authors":"Chang Cw, B. Ning","doi":"10.4172/2167-1052.1000E129","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-1052.1000E129","url":null,"abstract":"Ensuring drug efficacy and safety are unremitting challenges for drug manufacturers and public health organizations worldwide. It has been estimated that, when all of the drugs in the market used to treat common diseases are considered, only 25% to 60% of patients exhibit the expected pharmacological response [1], while a small portion of patients could develop adverse reactions (ADRs). ADRs are one of the leading causes of illness and death associated with prescription medications, and ADRs are estimated to occur in 6.2-6.7% of all hospitalized patients, resulting in more than 2 million adverse drug reaction cases annually, including approximate 100,000 incidences of death in the United States [2].","PeriodicalId":7385,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","volume":"210 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78080502","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2014-11-06DOI: 10.4172/2167-1052.1000E127
S. Garlapati, Anireddy Kr
Pharmacovigilance is the study that amplifies safety of drugs with the fundamental objective of complete abstain on the ADRs and timely identification/detection of new adverse drug reactions. The fundamental principle of the pharmacovigilance is to figure out and valuate the benefit and risk profile of the pharmacological activity and to increase the rational usage of drugs. Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR) are a major cause of patient morbidity and mortality. Spontaneous reporting of ADRs is found to be crucial in maintaining patient safety.
{"title":"Itâs All about Signals, Risk Management and How Important These Are?","authors":"S. Garlapati, Anireddy Kr","doi":"10.4172/2167-1052.1000E127","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-1052.1000E127","url":null,"abstract":"Pharmacovigilance is the study that amplifies safety of drugs with the fundamental objective of complete abstain on the ADRs and timely identification/detection of new adverse drug reactions. The fundamental principle of the pharmacovigilance is to figure out and valuate the benefit and risk profile of the pharmacological activity and to increase the rational usage of drugs. Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR) are a major cause of patient morbidity and mortality. Spontaneous reporting of ADRs is found to be crucial in maintaining patient safety.","PeriodicalId":7385,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","volume":"90 1","pages":"1-1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80213431","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2014-10-31DOI: 10.4172/2167-1052.1000168
Huang Wj, Hu Wx
Aims: Various transporters including efflux transporters and uptake transporters play an important role in the pharmacokinetics of drugs. At present, interestingly, more and more studies had found that numbers of antibiotics were the substrates of transporters, and these antibiotics were usually combined with other drugs to treat disease more effectively in clinic. Therefore, it is necessary to focus on the role of transporters in pharmacokinetics and drugdrug interactions of antibiotics. Methods: This review summarized the findings of recent studies as well as information obtained from several databases (update to June 2012): ISI Web of Knowledge SM (ISI WoK), SciFinder (Caplus, Medline, Registry,Casreact, Chrmlist, Chemcasts) and PubMed (indexed for Medline). Results: The present review will provides useful information for studying the role of transporters in pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interactions of antibiotics, and should be of help to those intending to further research on these topics. Conclusions: The drug transporter plays a significant role in the pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interactions of antibiotics.
目的:包括外排转运体和摄取转运体在内的多种转运体在药物的药代动力学中起重要作用。目前,有趣的是,越来越多的研究发现,许多抗生素是转运体的底物,这些抗生素在临床上通常与其他药物联合使用,以更有效地治疗疾病。因此,有必要关注转运体在抗生素药代动力学和药物-药物相互作用中的作用。方法:本综述总结了最近的研究结果以及从几个数据库(更新至2012年6月)获得的信息:ISI Web of Knowledge SM (ISI WoK), SciFinder (Caplus, Medline, Registry,Casreact, Chrmlist, chemcast)和PubMed (Medline索引)。结果:本综述为研究转运体在抗生素药代动力学和药物-药物相互作用中的作用提供了有益的信息,并对进一步开展这方面的研究有一定的帮助。结论:药物转运体在抗生素的药代动力学和药物-药物相互作用中起重要作用。
{"title":"The Role of Transporters in the Pharmacokinetics of Antibiotics","authors":"Huang Wj, Hu Wx","doi":"10.4172/2167-1052.1000168","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-1052.1000168","url":null,"abstract":"Aims: Various transporters including efflux transporters and uptake transporters play an important role in the pharmacokinetics of drugs. At present, interestingly, more and more studies had found that numbers of antibiotics were the substrates of transporters, and these antibiotics were usually combined with other drugs to treat disease more effectively in clinic. Therefore, it is necessary to focus on the role of transporters in pharmacokinetics and drugdrug interactions of antibiotics. \u0000Methods: This review summarized the findings of recent studies as well as information obtained from several databases (update to June 2012): ISI Web of Knowledge SM (ISI WoK), SciFinder (Caplus, Medline, Registry,Casreact, Chrmlist, Chemcasts) and PubMed (indexed for Medline). \u0000Results: The present review will provides useful information for studying the role of transporters in pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interactions of antibiotics, and should be of help to those intending to further research on these topics. \u0000Conclusions: The drug transporter plays a significant role in the pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interactions of antibiotics.","PeriodicalId":7385,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","volume":"10 28 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80650042","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2014-10-28DOI: 10.4172/2167-1052.1000167
D. Nguyen, N. Banerjee, D. Abdelaziz, Lewis Jh
Background: The use of certain medications in patients with chronic liver disease and cirrhosis remains controversial. No formal evidence-based guidelines have been published regarding the use of acetaminophen or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in patients in this setting. As a result, whether or not to prescribe these medications and at what dosages in patients with chronic liver disease or cirrhosis is often met with much consternation. Objective: We assessed the prescribing preferences of senior medical students, internal medicine residents, and gastroenterology fellows for using NSAIDs and acetaminophen in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD), including those with cirrhosis. Methods: A 21-question web-based survey was distributed to several major teaching hospitals in Washington, DC. An online survey software (Survey Monkey) was used to collect and analyze responses. Results: A total of 543 trainees were sent the survey with 174 (32%) responding. The majority of respondents who were willing to use acetaminophen recommended a daily dose of 2 gms or less regardless of their level of training. Internal medicine residents and senior medical students tended to recommend against acetaminophen at any dose in favor of NSAIDs in decompensated cirrhotics. All trainee levels showed a diminishing preference towards using a therapeutic dose of 4 gms acetaminophen per day as a function of CLD severity. Conclusions: There is a wide divide at the trainee level regarding the usage and dosing for acetaminophen in patients with chronic liver disease. Additional education on the safe use of NSAIDs and acetaminophen in CLD and cirrhosis needs to begin in medical school. Senior students in particular voiced the need for controlled prospective studies in order to develop evidence-based guidelines to determine the appropriate indications for use of NSAIDs and acetaminophen along the spectrum of hepatic impairment in chronic liver disease.
{"title":"Traineesâ Attitudes and Preferences towards the Use of Over the CounterAnalgesics in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease","authors":"D. Nguyen, N. Banerjee, D. Abdelaziz, Lewis Jh","doi":"10.4172/2167-1052.1000167","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-1052.1000167","url":null,"abstract":"Background: The use of certain medications in patients with chronic liver disease and cirrhosis remains controversial. No formal evidence-based guidelines have been published regarding the use of acetaminophen or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in patients in this setting. As a result, whether or not to prescribe these medications and at what dosages in patients with chronic liver disease or cirrhosis is often met with much consternation. Objective: We assessed the prescribing preferences of senior medical students, internal medicine residents, and gastroenterology fellows for using NSAIDs and acetaminophen in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD), including those with cirrhosis. Methods: A 21-question web-based survey was distributed to several major teaching hospitals in Washington, DC. An online survey software (Survey Monkey) was used to collect and analyze responses. Results: A total of 543 trainees were sent the survey with 174 (32%) responding. The majority of respondents who were willing to use acetaminophen recommended a daily dose of 2 gms or less regardless of their level of training. Internal medicine residents and senior medical students tended to recommend against acetaminophen at any dose in favor of NSAIDs in decompensated cirrhotics. All trainee levels showed a diminishing preference towards using a therapeutic dose of 4 gms acetaminophen per day as a function of CLD severity. Conclusions: There is a wide divide at the trainee level regarding the usage and dosing for acetaminophen in patients with chronic liver disease. Additional education on the safe use of NSAIDs and acetaminophen in CLD and cirrhosis needs to begin in medical school. Senior students in particular voiced the need for controlled prospective studies in order to develop evidence-based guidelines to determine the appropriate indications for use of NSAIDs and acetaminophen along the spectrum of hepatic impairment in chronic liver disease.","PeriodicalId":7385,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","volume":"72 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82933628","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2014-10-24DOI: 10.4172/2167-1052.1000165
A. Yerramilli, S. Veerla, E. Chintala, M. Guduguntla, P. Velivelli, S. Sharma, R. Paul
Objective: To identify adverse drug reactions by using a comprehensive trigger tool method. To categorize the identified adverse drug reactions based upon their Probability, Severity, Harm and Preventability by using different scales. Methods: A single-center, Cross-sectional, observational study based on medication and laboratory trigger tool methodology was conducted over a period of six months. The World Health Organization definition of adverse drug reactions was adopted. A list of 17 triggers were used to trace the adverse drug reactions which were then analyzed to assess the causality by using Naranjo’s scale, severity by Hartwig and Siegel scale, and harm by the National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Preventing Index and preventability by Modified Schumock and Thornton scale. Results: A total of 100 suspected ADRs were collected and analyzed. The drug classes most commonly implicated with ADRs were cephalosporins (25%) followed by anti-diabetic agents (19%). According to Naranjo’s scale, the reactions were categorized as probable (80%), possible (10%) and definite (5%). According to the modified Schumock and Thornton preventability scale, 20 cases (20%) were possibly preventable while 80 cases (80%) were not preventable. In 85 cases (85%) the suspected drug was withdrawn while in 10 cases (10%) no change in dose was made and in 5 cases (5%) the dose was altered. Conclusion: Pharmacovigilance using tracer techniques significantly increases the identification and reporting of ADRs. The tracer technique is relatively simple, sensitive, less expensive and largely effective compared to traditional methods. The Trigger tool provides an additional instrument in improving patient safety. This technique leads to an increase in awareness and reporting of ADRs and provide opportunities for the health care system to review drug selection and prescribing practices affecting patient outcomes.
目的:应用综合触发工具法鉴别药物不良反应。将已发现的药物不良反应按其发生概率、严重程度、危害性和可预防性采用不同的量表进行分类。方法:单中心,横断面,观察性研究基于药物和实验室触发工具方法学进行了为期6个月。采用了世界卫生组织对药物不良反应的定义。采用17种药物不良反应触发因素对不良反应进行追踪,并采用Naranjo量表对不良反应的因果关系进行分析,采用Hartwig and Siegel量表对不良反应的严重程度进行分析,采用国家药物错误报告与预防指数协调委员会对不良反应的危害程度进行评估,采用改进Schumock and Thornton量表对不良反应的可预防性进行评估。结果:共收集并分析了100例疑似不良反应。与不良反应最相关的药物类别是头孢菌素(25%),其次是抗糖尿病药物(19%)。根据纳兰霍量表,将反应分为可能(80%)、可能(10%)和确定(5%)。根据改良的Schumock和Thornton可预防性量表,20例(20%)可能可预防,80例(80%)不可预防。85例(85%)停药,10例(10%)不改变剂量,5例(5%)改变剂量。结论:采用示踪技术进行药物警戒可显著增加对不良反应的识别和报告。与传统方法相比,示踪技术相对简单、灵敏、便宜、有效。Trigger工具为改善患者安全提供了额外的工具。这项技术提高了对不良反应的认识和报告,并为卫生保健系统审查影响患者预后的药物选择和处方做法提供了机会。
{"title":"A Pharmacovigilance Study Using Tracer Techniques","authors":"A. Yerramilli, S. Veerla, E. Chintala, M. Guduguntla, P. Velivelli, S. Sharma, R. Paul","doi":"10.4172/2167-1052.1000165","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-1052.1000165","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To identify adverse drug reactions by using a comprehensive trigger tool method. To categorize the identified adverse drug reactions based upon their Probability, Severity, Harm and Preventability by using different scales. \u0000Methods: A single-center, Cross-sectional, observational study based on medication and laboratory trigger tool methodology was conducted over a period of six months. The World Health Organization definition of adverse drug reactions was adopted. A list of 17 triggers were used to trace the adverse drug reactions which were then analyzed to assess the causality by using Naranjo’s scale, severity by Hartwig and Siegel scale, and harm by the National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Preventing Index and preventability by Modified Schumock and Thornton scale. \u0000Results: A total of 100 suspected ADRs were collected and analyzed. The drug classes most commonly implicated with ADRs were cephalosporins (25%) followed by anti-diabetic agents (19%). According to Naranjo’s scale, the reactions were categorized as probable (80%), possible (10%) and definite (5%). According to the modified Schumock and Thornton preventability scale, 20 cases (20%) were possibly preventable while 80 cases (80%) were not preventable. In 85 cases (85%) the suspected drug was withdrawn while in 10 cases (10%) no change in dose was made and in 5 cases (5%) the dose was altered. \u0000Conclusion: Pharmacovigilance using tracer techniques significantly increases the identification and reporting of ADRs. The tracer technique is relatively simple, sensitive, less expensive and largely effective compared to traditional methods. The Trigger tool provides an additional instrument in improving patient safety. This technique leads to an increase in awareness and reporting of ADRs and provide opportunities for the health care system to review drug selection and prescribing practices affecting patient outcomes.","PeriodicalId":7385,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","volume":"4 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87509062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2014-10-24DOI: 10.4172/2167-1052.1000166
P. Datar
Opthalmic formulation was prepared considering the essential requirements for the healthy eye. Acacia gum was used along with zinc sulphate as essential nutrients. The pH was adjusted to make the solution isotonic by using NaCl and other buffer solutions. The formulation was evaluated for viscosity and eye irritation test. The formulation was made in concerned with dry eye syndrome and associated disease due to old age. Formulation was observed for particle size and sterility test and finally stability test.
{"title":"Development of Opthalmic Formulation for Dry Eye Syndrome","authors":"P. Datar","doi":"10.4172/2167-1052.1000166","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-1052.1000166","url":null,"abstract":"Opthalmic formulation was prepared considering the essential requirements for the healthy eye. Acacia gum was used along with zinc sulphate as essential nutrients. The pH was adjusted to make the solution isotonic by using NaCl and other buffer solutions. The formulation was evaluated for viscosity and eye irritation test. The formulation was made in concerned with dry eye syndrome and associated disease due to old age. Formulation was observed for particle size and sterility test and finally stability test.","PeriodicalId":7385,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","volume":"11 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76819658","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2014-10-17DOI: 10.4172/2167-1052.1000E126
F. Kamali
The main advantages of NOACs over warfarin are their predictable pharmacokinetics and clinical response thus obviating the need for routine anticoagulation monitoring or monitoring of plasma drug levels, fewer drug interactions and the lack of interaction with diet. More crucially NOACS were developed and marketed to be used as fixed-dose regimens, which is considered to be a substantial advantage over warfarin. Prescription numbers for NOACs have risen sharply since their launch for both newly diagnosed patients requiring initiation of anticoagulant therapy and existing patients on warfarin with poor anticoagulation control being switched to a NOAC, with prescriptions in England for dabigatran in 2012 compared to 2011 increasing 1,600%, from around 3,000 to around 48,000, and prescriptions for rivaroxaban in 2012 being around 16,000 [2]. Whilst non-inferiority of NOACs to warfarin in their clinical effectiveness for stroke prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation in the RE-LY, ROCKET-AF, and ARISTOTLE studies has been established, the bleeding adverse reactions reported in those trials, may be contributed to by patient age, with the noted incidence of bleeding being greater in those aged 75 years and over [3-5]. It is of concern that in view of the use of NOACs in atrial fibrillation the more elderly were not well represented in the trials, and clinical experience is too short to provide models of use which optimise the benefits of therapy and ensure therapy can be safely prescribed. Although prescribing rates for NOACs have grown rapidly since their launch, concerns about fatal bleeds have emerged particularly in elderly people, who are at a greater risk. A later sub-analysis of the RE-LY trial data by the manufacturer of dabigatran, Boehringer Ingleheim, showed that there were 5-fold variations in plasma dabigatran concentration for each of the two doses (110 and 150 mg) that were tested [6]. Further analysis of the data showed that renal function is the most important determinant for
{"title":"Are Novel Oral Anticoagulants (Noacs) as Safe as They are Said to Be","authors":"F. Kamali","doi":"10.4172/2167-1052.1000E126","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-1052.1000E126","url":null,"abstract":"The main advantages of NOACs over warfarin are their predictable pharmacokinetics and clinical response thus obviating the need for routine anticoagulation monitoring or monitoring of plasma drug levels, fewer drug interactions and the lack of interaction with diet. More crucially NOACS were developed and marketed to be used as fixed-dose regimens, which is considered to be a substantial advantage over warfarin. Prescription numbers for NOACs have risen sharply since their launch for both newly diagnosed patients requiring initiation of anticoagulant therapy and existing patients on warfarin with poor anticoagulation control being switched to a NOAC, with prescriptions in England for dabigatran in 2012 compared to 2011 increasing 1,600%, from around 3,000 to around 48,000, and prescriptions for rivaroxaban in 2012 being around 16,000 [2]. Whilst non-inferiority of NOACs to warfarin in their clinical effectiveness for stroke prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation in the RE-LY, ROCKET-AF, and ARISTOTLE studies has been established, the bleeding adverse reactions reported in those trials, may be contributed to by patient age, with the noted incidence of bleeding being greater in those aged 75 years and over [3-5]. It is of concern that in view of the use of NOACs in atrial fibrillation the more elderly were not well represented in the trials, and clinical experience is too short to provide models of use which optimise the benefits of therapy and ensure therapy can be safely prescribed. Although prescribing rates for NOACs have grown rapidly since their launch, concerns about fatal bleeds have emerged particularly in elderly people, who are at a greater risk. A later sub-analysis of the RE-LY trial data by the manufacturer of dabigatran, Boehringer Ingleheim, showed that there were 5-fold variations in plasma dabigatran concentration for each of the two doses (110 and 150 mg) that were tested [6]. Further analysis of the data showed that renal function is the most important determinant for","PeriodicalId":7385,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77644187","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2014-10-10DOI: 10.4172/2167-1052.1000164
A. Vaqué, M. Sust, Neus Gascón, A. Puyada, S. Videla
Background: The concomitant administration of opioids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is used to manage pain in clinical practice, given their synergistic analgesic effect. Among their possible combinations, tramadol and celecoxib are routinely used. The aim of this study was to explore the safety profile of tramadol and celecoxib administered individually compared to their concomitant administration in clinical practice. Methods: Retrospective analysis of adverse-drug-reactions from the safety database Vigibase, The WHO global individual case safety report database system. A case was defined as an adverse-drug-reaction included in a report of Vigibase between January 2000 and March 2012. Three groups were studied: ‘tramadol-no-celecoxib’ (tramadol was only reported as suspected or interacting drug), ‘celecoxib-no-tramadol’ (celecoxib was only reported as suspected or interacting drug) and ‘celecoxib+tramadol’ (both drugs co-administered and reported as suspected or interacting drug). MedDRA dictionary was used to code adverse-drug-reactions. Reporting proportions were calculated as the number of adverse-drug reactions of a given type divided by the overall total number of reported adverse-drug-reaction in each drug-group. Results: Reporting proportions for global profile, and for each studied group of adverse-drug-reaction, were lower for the concomitant administration than for each individual drug, specifically for the drug (either tramadol or celecoxib) primary involved in the particular adverse-drug-reaction. Therefore, no safety signals were found for ‘gastrointestinal bleeding’ and ‘gastrointestinal signs and symptoms’; ‘cardiovascular’ and ‘cerebrovascular events’ (related to ‘ischemic and embolic-thrombotic events’); ‘renal’ and ‘renovascular’ events (including cardiac failure related events); neither for ‘central nervous system’ effects; neither for ‘respiratory depression’; ‘development of tolerance with repeated administration’ (including abuse/dependence/withdrawal reported events); ‘hepatic disorders (drug-related)’; ‘skin events’; and neither for the most frequent preferred terms: ‘nausea’, ‘vomiting’, ‘constipation’, ‘myocardial infarction’ and ‘hypertension’. Conclusion: Based on reporting proportions, no trend was observed to an increased risk for any specific potential safety concern when both tramadol and celecoxib, are administered concomitantly.
{"title":"A Review of Safety Data from Spontaneous Reports on Marketed Products Containing Tramadol and Celecoxib: A Vigibase Descriptive Analysis","authors":"A. Vaqué, M. Sust, Neus Gascón, A. Puyada, S. Videla","doi":"10.4172/2167-1052.1000164","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-1052.1000164","url":null,"abstract":"Background: The concomitant administration of opioids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is used to manage pain in clinical practice, given their synergistic analgesic effect. Among their possible combinations, tramadol and celecoxib are routinely used. The aim of this study was to explore the safety profile of tramadol and celecoxib administered individually compared to their concomitant administration in clinical practice. \u0000Methods: Retrospective analysis of adverse-drug-reactions from the safety database Vigibase, The WHO global individual case safety report database system. A case was defined as an adverse-drug-reaction included in a report of Vigibase between January 2000 and March 2012. Three groups were studied: ‘tramadol-no-celecoxib’ (tramadol was only reported as suspected or interacting drug), ‘celecoxib-no-tramadol’ (celecoxib was only reported as suspected or interacting drug) and ‘celecoxib+tramadol’ (both drugs co-administered and reported as suspected or interacting drug). MedDRA dictionary was used to code adverse-drug-reactions. Reporting proportions were calculated as the number of adverse-drug reactions of a given type divided by the overall total number of reported adverse-drug-reaction in each drug-group. \u0000Results: Reporting proportions for global profile, and for each studied group of adverse-drug-reaction, were lower for the concomitant administration than for each individual drug, specifically for the drug (either tramadol or celecoxib) primary involved in the particular adverse-drug-reaction. Therefore, no safety signals were found for ‘gastrointestinal bleeding’ and ‘gastrointestinal signs and symptoms’; ‘cardiovascular’ and ‘cerebrovascular events’ \u0000(related to ‘ischemic and embolic-thrombotic events’); ‘renal’ and ‘renovascular’ events (including cardiac failure related events); neither for ‘central nervous system’ effects; neither for ‘respiratory depression’; ‘development of tolerance with repeated administration’ (including abuse/dependence/withdrawal reported events); ‘hepatic disorders (drug-related)’; ‘skin events’; and neither for the most frequent preferred terms: ‘nausea’, ‘vomiting’, ‘constipation’, ‘myocardial infarction’ and ‘hypertension’. \u0000Conclusion: Based on reporting proportions, no trend was observed to an increased risk for any specific potential safety concern when both tramadol and celecoxib, are administered concomitantly.","PeriodicalId":7385,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","volume":"31 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86557938","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2014-10-08DOI: 10.4172/2167-1052.1000162
C. Baz, I. Abdu-Aguye, K. Ho
Drug administration practice of mothers from 20 facilities (12 primary and 8 secondary) in northwestern Nigeria were assessed prospectively with the aim of identifying the type, frequency and potential clinical significance of drug administration errors in paediatric outpatients. The data was analyzed and errors classified according to National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention taxonomy. Educational interventions were designed and administered to mothers of 10 (6 primary and 4 secondary) least performing facilities, while the remaining 10 facilities acted as control. The percentage of the parents that claimed to knew the correct dosage were relatively high (78% to 93%) and differ significantly between the secondary and primary facilities. Further assessment shows that the dose of the drugs dispensed, the time/frequency of administration, and the duration of use were not known by 68.2% (330/484), 63.0% (305/484), and 12.0% (58/484) of the mothers respectively. The overall total possibility of the drug administration errors significantly reduced in the right direction (p<0.0005; d=4.27) after the intervention.
{"title":"Evaluating Educational Intervention to Improve Drug Administration Practice in Out-Patient Children in Northwestern Nigeria","authors":"C. Baz, I. Abdu-Aguye, K. Ho","doi":"10.4172/2167-1052.1000162","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-1052.1000162","url":null,"abstract":"Drug administration practice of mothers from 20 facilities (12 primary and 8 secondary) in northwestern Nigeria were assessed prospectively with the aim of identifying the type, frequency and potential clinical significance of drug administration errors in paediatric outpatients. The data was analyzed and errors classified according to National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention taxonomy. Educational interventions were designed and administered to mothers of 10 (6 primary and 4 secondary) least performing facilities, while the remaining 10 facilities acted as control. The percentage of the parents that claimed to knew the correct dosage were relatively high (78% to 93%) and differ significantly between the secondary and primary facilities. Further assessment shows that the dose of the drugs dispensed, the time/frequency of administration, and the duration of use were not known by 68.2% (330/484), 63.0% (305/484), and 12.0% (58/484) of the mothers respectively. The overall total possibility of the drug administration errors significantly reduced in the right direction (p<0.0005; d=4.27) \u0000after the intervention.","PeriodicalId":7385,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","volume":"22 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73995905","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}