首页 > 最新文献

Journal of the National Cancer Center最新文献

英文 中文
The role of radiotherapy in patients with refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma after treatment with brentuximab vedotin and/or immune checkpoint inhibitors 放疗在接受布仑妥昔单抗韦多汀和/或免疫检查点抑制剂治疗后的难治性霍奇金淋巴瘤患者中的作用
Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2023.11.001
Ruizhi Zhao , Han Shao , Guiqing Shi , Yanyan Qiu , Tianlan Tang , Yuping Lin , Silin Chen , Cheng Huang , Siqin Liao , Jinhua Chen , Haiying Fu , Jianzhi Liu , Benhua Xu , Tingbo Liu , Yujing Zhang , Yong Yang

Background

Approximately 10%–30% of patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) experience relapse or refractory (R/R) disease after first-line standard therapy. Brentuximab vedotin (BV) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have important roles in the salvage treatment of R/R HL. However, subsequent treatment for HL refractory to BV and/or ICI treatment is challenging.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed patients in two institutions who had R/R HL, experienced BV or ICI treatment failure, and received radiotherapy (RT) thereafter. The overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed.

Results

Overall, 19 patients were enrolled. First-line systemic therapy comprised doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD, 84.2%); AVD plus ICIs (10.5%); and bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (BEACOPP, 5.3%). After first-line therapy, 15 (78.9%) and four patients (21.1%) had refractory disease and relapsed, respectively. After R/R HL diagnosis, six (31.6%), two (10.5%), and 11 (57.9%) patients received BV and ICIs concurrently, BV monotherapy, and ICI monotherapy, respectively. All patients received intensity-modulated RT (n = 12, 63.2%) or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT; n = 7, 36.8%). The ORR as well as the complete response (CR) rate was 100%; the median DOR to RT was 17.2 months (range, 7.9–46.7 months). Two patients showed progression outside the radiation field; one patient had extensive in-field, out-of-field, nodal, and extranodal relapse. With a median follow-up time of 16.2 months (range, 9.2–23.2 months), the 1-year PFS and OS were 84.4% and 100%, respectively. PFS was associated with extranodal involvement (P = 0.019) and gross tumor volume (P = 0.044). All patients tolerated RT well without adverse events of grade ≥ 3.

Conclusion

RT is effective and safe for treating HL refractory to BV or ICIs and has the potential to be part of a comprehensive strategy for HL.

背景约有10%-30%的霍奇金淋巴瘤(HL)患者在接受一线标准治疗后复发或难治(R/R)。布伦妥昔单抗维多汀(BV)和免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)在R/R HL的挽救治疗中发挥着重要作用。方法我们回顾性分析了两家机构的R/R HL患者,这些患者经历了BV或ICI治疗失败,之后接受了放疗(RT)。我们分析了总反应率(ORR)、反应持续时间(DOR)、无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。一线系统治疗包括多柔比星、博来霉素、长春新碱和达卡巴嗪(ABVD,84.2%);AVD加ICIs(10.5%);博来霉素、依托泊苷、多柔比星、环磷酰胺、长春新碱、丙卡巴嗪和泼尼松(BEACOPP,5.3%)。经过一线治疗后,分别有 15 名(78.9%)和 4 名(21.1%)患者出现难治性疾病和复发。R/R HL确诊后,分别有6名(31.6%)、2名(10.5%)和11名(57.9%)患者同时接受了BV和ICI治疗、BV单药治疗和ICI单药治疗。所有患者都接受了强度调控 RT(12 人,63.2%)或容积调控弧治疗(VMAT;7 人,36.8%)。ORR和完全缓解(CR)率均为100%;RT的中位延迟时间为17.2个月(范围为7.9-46.7个月)。两名患者在放射野外出现进展;一名患者出现广泛的放射野内、放射野外、结节和结节外复发。中位随访时间为16.2个月(9.2-23.2个月),1年的PFS和OS分别为84.4%和100%。PFS与结节外受累(P = 0.019)和肿瘤总体积(P = 0.044)有关。所有患者对RT的耐受性良好,未出现≥3级的不良反应。结论RT治疗BV或ICIs难治性HL有效且安全,有望成为HL综合治疗策略的一部分。
{"title":"The role of radiotherapy in patients with refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma after treatment with brentuximab vedotin and/or immune checkpoint inhibitors","authors":"Ruizhi Zhao ,&nbsp;Han Shao ,&nbsp;Guiqing Shi ,&nbsp;Yanyan Qiu ,&nbsp;Tianlan Tang ,&nbsp;Yuping Lin ,&nbsp;Silin Chen ,&nbsp;Cheng Huang ,&nbsp;Siqin Liao ,&nbsp;Jinhua Chen ,&nbsp;Haiying Fu ,&nbsp;Jianzhi Liu ,&nbsp;Benhua Xu ,&nbsp;Tingbo Liu ,&nbsp;Yujing Zhang ,&nbsp;Yong Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.jncc.2023.11.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jncc.2023.11.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Approximately 10%–30% of patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) experience relapse or refractory (R/R) disease after first-line standard therapy. Brentuximab vedotin (BV) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have important roles in the salvage treatment of R/R HL. However, subsequent treatment for HL refractory to BV and/or ICI treatment is challenging.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively analyzed patients in two institutions who had R/R HL, experienced BV or ICI treatment failure, and received radiotherapy (RT) thereafter. The overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 19 patients were enrolled. First-line systemic therapy comprised doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD, 84.2%); AVD plus ICIs (10.5%); and bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (BEACOPP, 5.3%). After first-line therapy, 15 (78.9%) and four patients (21.1%) had refractory disease and relapsed, respectively. After R/R HL diagnosis, six (31.6%), two (10.5%), and 11 (57.9%) patients received BV and ICIs concurrently, BV monotherapy, and ICI monotherapy, respectively. All patients received intensity-modulated RT (<em>n</em> = 12, 63.2%) or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT; <em>n</em> = 7, 36.8%). The ORR as well as the complete response (CR) rate was 100%; the median DOR to RT was 17.2 months (range, 7.9–46.7 months). Two patients showed progression outside the radiation field; one patient had extensive in-field, out-of-field, nodal, and extranodal relapse. With a median follow-up time of 16.2 months (range, 9.2–23.2 months), the 1-year PFS and OS were 84.4% and 100%, respectively. PFS was associated with extranodal involvement (<em>P</em> = 0.019) and gross tumor volume (<em>P</em> = 0.044). All patients tolerated RT well without adverse events of grade ≥ 3.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>RT is effective and safe for treating HL refractory to BV or ICIs and has the potential to be part of a comprehensive strategy for HL.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Center","volume":"4 1","pages":"Pages 86-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667005423000790/pdfft?md5=5ed10c1d2418af0cb19e4f5fcaa00df9&pid=1-s2.0-S2667005423000790-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135614133","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Drug-tolerant persister cancer cells 耐药性顽固癌细胞
Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2023.12.002
Pengliang Wang , Bin Ke , Gang Ma
{"title":"Drug-tolerant persister cancer cells","authors":"Pengliang Wang ,&nbsp;Bin Ke ,&nbsp;Gang Ma","doi":"10.1016/j.jncc.2023.12.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jncc.2023.12.002","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Center","volume":"4 1","pages":"Pages 1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667005423000844/pdfft?md5=59574b79966cb188e3fcb885b16f71f3&pid=1-s2.0-S2667005423000844-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139018710","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The breast cancer tumor microenvironment and precision medicine: immunogenicity and conditions favoring response to immunotherapy 乳腺癌肿瘤微环境与精准医疗:免疫原性和免疫疗法的有利条件
Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2024.01.004
Andrea Nicolini , Paola Ferrari , Roberto Silvestri , Federica Gemignani

Some main recent researches that have dissected tumor microenvironment (TME) by imaging mass cytometry (IMC) in different subtypes of primary breast cancer samples were considered. The many phenotypic variants, clusters of epithelial tumor and immune cells, their structural features as well as the main genetic aberrations, sub-clonal heterogeneity and their systematic classification also have been examined. Mutational evolution has been assessed in primary and metastatic breast cancer samples. Overall, based on these findings the current concept of precision medicine is questioned and challenged by alternative therapeutic strategies. In the last two decades, immunotherapy as a powerful and harmless tool to fight cancer has received huge attention. Thus, the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) composition, its prognostic role for clinical course as well as a novel definition of immunogenicity in breast cancer are proposed. Investigational clinical trials carried out by us and other findings suggest that G0-G1 state induced in endocrine-dependent metastatic breast cancer is more suitable for successful immune manipulation. Residual micro-metastatic disease seems to be another specific condition that can significantly favor the immune response in breast and other solid tumors.

最近的一些主要研究通过成像质谱(IMC)对不同亚型原发性乳腺癌样本中的肿瘤微环境(TME)进行了剖析。研究还考察了许多表型变异、上皮肿瘤和免疫细胞群、其结构特征以及主要的遗传畸变、亚克隆异质性及其系统分类。对原发性和转移性乳腺癌样本的突变演变进行了评估。总之,基于这些研究结果,目前的精准医学概念受到了质疑,并受到其他治疗策略的挑战。在过去二十年中,免疫疗法作为一种强大而无害的抗癌工具受到了广泛关注。因此,我们提出了肿瘤免疫微环境(TIME)的组成、其对临床病程的预后作用以及乳腺癌免疫原性的新定义。我们进行的临床试验和其他研究结果表明,内分泌依赖性转移性乳腺癌诱发的 G0-G1 状态更适合成功的免疫操作。残留的微转移性疾病似乎是另一种能显著促进乳腺癌和其他实体瘤免疫反应的特殊情况。
{"title":"The breast cancer tumor microenvironment and precision medicine: immunogenicity and conditions favoring response to immunotherapy","authors":"Andrea Nicolini ,&nbsp;Paola Ferrari ,&nbsp;Roberto Silvestri ,&nbsp;Federica Gemignani","doi":"10.1016/j.jncc.2024.01.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jncc.2024.01.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Some main recent researches that have dissected tumor microenvironment (TME) by imaging mass cytometry (IMC) in different subtypes of primary breast cancer samples were considered. The many phenotypic variants, clusters of epithelial tumor and immune cells, their structural features as well as the main genetic aberrations, sub-clonal heterogeneity and their systematic classification also have been examined. Mutational evolution has been assessed in primary and metastatic breast cancer samples. Overall, based on these findings the current concept of precision medicine is questioned and challenged by alternative therapeutic strategies. In the last two decades, immunotherapy as a powerful and harmless tool to fight cancer has received huge attention. Thus, the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) composition, its prognostic role for clinical course as well as a novel definition of immunogenicity in breast cancer are proposed. Investigational clinical trials carried out by us and other findings suggest that G0-G1 state induced in endocrine-dependent metastatic breast cancer is more suitable for successful immune manipulation. Residual micro-metastatic disease seems to be another specific condition that can significantly favor the immune response in breast and other solid tumors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Center","volume":"4 1","pages":"Pages 14-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667005424000048/pdfft?md5=250175de16a639d9a4e99861ab76dd40&pid=1-s2.0-S2667005424000048-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139636455","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cancer survival analysis on population-based cancer registry data in Zhejiang Province, China (2018–2019) 中国浙江省基于人群的癌症登记数据的癌症生存分析(2018-2019年)
Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2023.12.003
Huizhang Li , Youqing Wang , Weiwei Gong , Chen Zhu , Le Wang , Yaoyao Chen , Lingbin Du , Xiangdong Cheng

Objective

This is a comprehensive overview of long-term cancer survival in Zhejiang Province, China. Hybrid analysis, a combination of cohort and period analysis, has been proposed to derive up-to-date cancer survival estimates. Using this approach, we aimed to timely and accurately analyze the 5-year relative survival (RS) and net survival (NS) in cancer registries of Zhejiang Province, China.

Methods

A total of 255,725 new cancer cases diagnosed during 2013–2017 were included in 14 cancer registries in Zhejiang Province, China, with a follow-up on vital status until the end of 2019. The hybrid analysis was used to calculate the 5-year RS and 5-year NS during 2018–2019 for overall and stratifications by sex, cancer type, region, and age at diagnosis.

Results

During 2018–2019, the age-standardized 5-year RS and NS for overall cancer in Zhejiang was 47.5% and 48.6%, respectively. The age-standardized 5-year RS for cancers of women (55.4%) was higher than that of men (40.0%), and the rate of urban areas (49.7%) was higher than that of rural areas (43.1%). The 5-year RS declined along with age, from 84.4% for ages <45 years to 23.7% for ages >74 years. Our results of the RS and NS showed the similar trend and no significant difference. The top five cancers with top age-standardized 5-year RS were thyroid cancer (96.0%), breast cancer (84.3%), testicular cancer (79.9%), prostate cancer (77.2%), and bladder cancer (70.6%), and the five cancers with the lowest age-standardized 5-year RS were pancreatic cancer (6.0%), liver cancer (15.6%), gallbladder cancer (17.1%), esophageal cancer (22.7%), and leukemia (31.0%).

Conclusions

We reported the most up-to-date 5-year cancer RS and NS in Zhejiang Province, China for the first time, and found that the 5-year survival for cancer patients in Zhejiang during 2018–2019 was relatively high. The population-based cancer registries are recognized as key policy tools that can be used to evaluate both the impact of cancer prevention strategies and the effectiveness of health systems.

本文全面概述了中国浙江省的长期癌症生存率。混合分析法是将队列分析法和时期分析法结合起来,以得出最新的癌症生存率估计值。采用这种方法,我们旨在及时、准确地分析中国浙江省癌症登记的5年相对生存率(RS)和净生存率(NS)。方法在中国浙江省的14个癌症登记中,共纳入了255725例2013-2017年间确诊的新发癌症病例,并对其生命状态进行随访至2019年底。采用混合分析法计算了2018-2019年总体及按性别、癌症类型、地区和诊断时年龄分层的5年RS和5年NS。结果2018-2019年,浙江总体癌症的年龄标准化5年RS和NS分别为47.5%和48.6%。女性癌症的年龄标准化5年RS(55.4%)高于男性(40.0%),城市地区(49.7%)高于农村地区(43.1%)。5 年 RS 随年龄增长而下降,从 45 岁的 84.4% 降至 74 岁的 23.7%。我们的RS和NS结果显示出相似的趋势,没有明显差异。年龄标准化 5 年 RS 最高的五种癌症是甲状腺癌(96.0%)、乳腺癌(84.3%)、睾丸癌(79.9%)、前列腺癌(77.2%)和膀胱癌(70.6%),年龄标准化 5 年 RS 最低的五种癌症是胰腺癌(6.0%)、肝癌(15.6%)、胆囊癌(17.1%)、食管癌(22.7%)和白血病(31.0%)。结论我们首次报道了中国浙江省最新的癌症5年RS和NS,发现2018-2019年间浙江省癌症患者的5年生存率相对较高。基于人群的癌症登记被认为是重要的政策工具,可用于评估癌症预防策略的影响和卫生系统的有效性。
{"title":"Cancer survival analysis on population-based cancer registry data in Zhejiang Province, China (2018–2019)","authors":"Huizhang Li ,&nbsp;Youqing Wang ,&nbsp;Weiwei Gong ,&nbsp;Chen Zhu ,&nbsp;Le Wang ,&nbsp;Yaoyao Chen ,&nbsp;Lingbin Du ,&nbsp;Xiangdong Cheng","doi":"10.1016/j.jncc.2023.12.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jncc.2023.12.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This is a comprehensive overview of long-term cancer survival in Zhejiang Province, China. Hybrid analysis, a combination of cohort and period analysis, has been proposed to derive up-to-date cancer survival estimates. Using this approach, we aimed to timely and accurately analyze the 5-year relative survival (RS) and net survival (NS) in cancer registries of Zhejiang Province, China.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 255,725 new cancer cases diagnosed during 2013–2017 were included in 14 cancer registries in Zhejiang Province, China, with a follow-up on vital status until the end of 2019. The hybrid analysis was used to calculate the 5-year RS and 5-year NS during 2018–2019 for overall and stratifications by sex, cancer type, region, and age at diagnosis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During 2018–2019, the age-standardized 5-year RS and NS for overall cancer in Zhejiang was 47.5% and 48.6%, respectively. The age-standardized 5-year RS for cancers of women (55.4%) was higher than that of men (40.0%), and the rate of urban areas (49.7%) was higher than that of rural areas (43.1%). The 5-year RS declined along with age, from 84.4% for ages &lt;45 years to 23.7% for ages &gt;74 years. Our results of the RS and NS showed the similar trend and no significant difference. The top five cancers with top age-standardized 5-year RS were thyroid cancer (96.0%), breast cancer (84.3%), testicular cancer (79.9%), prostate cancer (77.2%), and bladder cancer (70.6%), and the five cancers with the lowest age-standardized 5-year RS were pancreatic cancer (6.0%), liver cancer (15.6%), gallbladder cancer (17.1%), esophageal cancer (22.7%), and leukemia (31.0%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We reported the most up-to-date 5-year cancer RS and NS in Zhejiang Province, China for the first time, and found that the 5-year survival for cancer patients in Zhejiang during 2018–2019 was relatively high. The population-based cancer registries are recognized as key policy tools that can be used to evaluate both the impact of cancer prevention strategies and the effectiveness of health systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Center","volume":"4 1","pages":"Pages 54-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667005423000856/pdfft?md5=4397fd19f81b652927e9919540cb1f3a&pid=1-s2.0-S2667005423000856-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139193402","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How to properly evaluate cardiac vagal tone in oncology studies: a state-of-the-art review 如何在肿瘤研究中正确评估心脏迷走神经张力:最新综述
Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2024.02.002
Pierrick Martinez , Marilyne Grinand , Saïda Cheggour , Jérôme Taieb , Géraud Gourjon

Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis provides an assessment of cardiac vagal tone and consequently global cardiac health as well as systemic condition. In systemic diseases such as cancer and during treatments that affect the whole body, like chemotherapy, the vagus nerve activity is low and deregulated. Some studies focus on using HRV to predict mortality in oncology. However, in cancer patients, systemic alterations substantially increase artifacts during HRV measurement, especially atrial ectopic beats. Moreover, HRV may be altered by various factors (duration and time of measurement, breathing, drugs, and other confounding factors) that alter each metric in different ways. The Standard Deviation of all Normal to Normal intervals (SDNN) is the most commonly used metric to evaluate HRV in oncology, but it does not appear to be specific to the cardiac vagal tone. Thus, cardiac vagal activity diagnosis and vital prognosis of cancer patients can be biased. Our review presents the main HRV metrics that can be currently used in oncology studies and their links with vagus nerve and cancer. We present the influence of external factors and the required duration and time of measurement. Considering all these parameters, this review proposes seven key points for an assessment of HRV and cardiac vagal tone in patients with cancer.

心率变异性(HRV)分析可评估心脏迷走神经张力,进而评估整体心脏健康和全身状况。在癌症等全身性疾病中,以及在化疗等影响全身的治疗过程中,迷走神经的活动会减弱和失调。一些研究侧重于利用心率变异预测肿瘤患者的死亡率。然而,在癌症患者中,全身性改变会大大增加心率变异测量过程中的伪差,尤其是心房异位搏动。此外,心率变异可能会受到各种因素(测量持续时间和时间、呼吸、药物和其他混杂因素)的影响,从而以不同的方式改变每个指标。所有正常至正常间期的标准偏差(SDNN)是肿瘤学中评估心率变异最常用的指标,但它似乎对心脏迷走神经张力没有特异性。因此,对癌症患者的心脏迷走神经活动诊断和重要预后判断可能存在偏差。我们的综述介绍了目前可用于肿瘤学研究的主要心率变异指标及其与迷走神经和癌症的联系。我们还介绍了外部因素的影响以及测量所需的持续时间和时间。考虑到所有这些参数,本综述提出了评估癌症患者心率变异和心脏迷走神经张力的七个要点。
{"title":"How to properly evaluate cardiac vagal tone in oncology studies: a state-of-the-art review","authors":"Pierrick Martinez ,&nbsp;Marilyne Grinand ,&nbsp;Saïda Cheggour ,&nbsp;Jérôme Taieb ,&nbsp;Géraud Gourjon","doi":"10.1016/j.jncc.2024.02.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jncc.2024.02.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis provides an assessment of cardiac vagal tone and consequently global cardiac health as well as systemic condition. In systemic diseases such as cancer and during treatments that affect the whole body, like chemotherapy, the vagus nerve activity is low and deregulated. Some studies focus on using HRV to predict mortality in oncology. However, in cancer patients, systemic alterations substantially increase artifacts during HRV measurement, especially atrial ectopic beats. Moreover, HRV may be altered by various factors (duration and time of measurement, breathing, drugs, and other confounding factors) that alter each metric in different ways. The Standard Deviation of all Normal to Normal intervals (SDNN) is the most commonly used metric to evaluate HRV in oncology, but it does not appear to be specific to the cardiac vagal tone. Thus, cardiac vagal activity diagnosis and vital prognosis of cancer patients can be biased. Our review presents the main HRV metrics that can be currently used in oncology studies and their links with vagus nerve and cancer. We present the influence of external factors and the required duration and time of measurement. Considering all these parameters, this review proposes seven key points for an assessment of HRV and cardiac vagal tone in patients with cancer.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Center","volume":"4 1","pages":"Pages 36-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667005424000085/pdfft?md5=d8f5eb1248bc2daacfe614e365bf228b&pid=1-s2.0-S2667005424000085-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139826778","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Chinese quality control indices for standardized diagnosis and treatment of renal cancer (2022 edition) 中国肾癌规范化诊疗质量控制指标(2022 年版)
Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2023.11.004
Lin Yao , Yicong Du , Wen Dong , Xianshu Gao , Jun Guo , Jianxing Qiu , Qiang Wei , Shikai Wu , Dingwei Ye , Wei Yu , Hao Zeng , Qian Zhang , Yong Zhang , Zhiling Zhang , Fangjian Zhou , Wenjing Yang , Hui Wang , Xu Zhang , Zhisong He , for Renal Cancer Quality Control Experts Committee of National Cancer Quality Control Center, National Cancer Center of the People's Republic of China

Renal cancer is one of the most common malignancies of the urinary system, and the number of deaths continues to increase. The standardized management of the diagnosis and treatment of renal cancer is challenging due to the great differences in the diagnosis and treatment of renal cancer in different regions. The Renal Cancer Expert Committee of the National Cancer Quality Control Center (NCQCC) identified a lack of authoritative quality control standards as an opportunity to utilize its multidisciplinary membership to improve the standardized diagnosis and treatment of renal cancer. The Renal Cancer Expert Committee of the NCQCC aims to promote quality control and national standardization, uniformity, and normalization of renal cancer diagnosis and treatment, which ultimately improved the survival rate and quality of life of renal cancer patients. A panel of experts with renal cancer surgery, renal cancer medicine, medical imaging, pathology and radiotherapy were drawn together and determined the quality control standards for the standardized diagnosis and treatment of renal cancer. The Indices includes 20 items that cover all key areas in the diagnosis and treatment of renal cancer, such as standard diagnosis, surgery treatment, systemic treatment, and prognostic evaluation.

肾癌是泌尿系统最常见的恶性肿瘤之一,死亡人数持续上升。由于不同地区对肾癌的诊断和治疗存在很大差异,因此肾癌诊断和治疗的标准化管理具有挑战性。国家癌症质量控制中心(NCQCC)肾癌专家委员会认为,缺乏权威的质量控制标准是一个机会,可以利用其多学科成员的优势来改善肾癌的标准化诊断和治疗。全国质量控制中心肾癌专家委员会旨在促进质量控制和肾癌诊治的全国标准化、统一化和规范化,最终提高肾癌患者的生存率和生活质量。由肾癌外科、肾癌内科、医学影像科、病理科和放疗科专家组成的专家组共同制定了肾癌规范化诊疗质量控制标准。该指标包括 20 个项目,涵盖了肾癌诊断和治疗的所有关键领域,如标准诊断、手术治疗、系统治疗和预后评估。
{"title":"Chinese quality control indices for standardized diagnosis and treatment of renal cancer (2022 edition)","authors":"Lin Yao ,&nbsp;Yicong Du ,&nbsp;Wen Dong ,&nbsp;Xianshu Gao ,&nbsp;Jun Guo ,&nbsp;Jianxing Qiu ,&nbsp;Qiang Wei ,&nbsp;Shikai Wu ,&nbsp;Dingwei Ye ,&nbsp;Wei Yu ,&nbsp;Hao Zeng ,&nbsp;Qian Zhang ,&nbsp;Yong Zhang ,&nbsp;Zhiling Zhang ,&nbsp;Fangjian Zhou ,&nbsp;Wenjing Yang ,&nbsp;Hui Wang ,&nbsp;Xu Zhang ,&nbsp;Zhisong He ,&nbsp;for Renal Cancer Quality Control Experts Committee of National Cancer Quality Control Center, National Cancer Center of the People's Republic of China","doi":"10.1016/j.jncc.2023.11.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jncc.2023.11.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Renal cancer is one of the most common malignancies of the urinary system, and the number of deaths continues to increase. The standardized management of the diagnosis and treatment of renal cancer is challenging due to the great differences in the diagnosis and treatment of renal cancer in different regions. The Renal Cancer Expert Committee of the National Cancer Quality Control Center (NCQCC) identified a lack of authoritative quality control standards as an opportunity to utilize its multidisciplinary membership to improve the standardized diagnosis and treatment of renal cancer. The Renal Cancer Expert Committee of the NCQCC aims to promote quality control and national standardization, uniformity, and normalization of renal cancer diagnosis and treatment, which ultimately improved the survival rate and quality of life of renal cancer patients. A panel of experts with renal cancer surgery, renal cancer medicine, medical imaging, pathology and radiotherapy were drawn together and determined the quality control standards for the standardized diagnosis and treatment of renal cancer. The Indices includes 20 items that cover all key areas in the diagnosis and treatment of renal cancer, such as standard diagnosis, surgery treatment, systemic treatment, and prognostic evaluation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Center","volume":"4 1","pages":"Pages 6-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667005423000820/pdfft?md5=20ee7619013802ca7233b6847fdc8dc5&pid=1-s2.0-S2667005423000820-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138624611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2022 2022 年中国癌症发病率和死亡率
Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2024.01.006
Bingfeng Han , Rongshou Zheng , Hongmei Zeng , Shaoming Wang , Kexin Sun , Ru Chen , Li Li , Wenqiang Wei , Jie He

Background

The National Cancer Center (NCC) of China regularly reports the nationwide statistics on cancer incidence and mortality in China. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) calculates and publishes the cancer burden of countries around the world every two years. To ensure consistency between the actual surveillance data in China and the data published by IARC, NCC has received approval from the National Health Commission and IARC to simultaneously release the cancer burden data for China in GLOBOCAN 2022.

Methods

There were a total of 700 registries reporting high-quality data on cancer incidence and mortality across China in 2018, of which 106 registries with continuous monitoring from 2010 to 2018 were used to establish an age-period-cohort model to simulate the trend of cancer incidence and mortality and to estimate the incidence and mortality in China in 2022. In addition, we analyzed the temporal trends of age-standardized cancer incidence and mortality from 2000 to 2018 using data from 22 continuous cancer registries.

Results

It was estimated about 4,824,700 new cancer cases and 2,574,200 new cancer deaths occurred in China in 2022. Cancers of the lung, colon-rectum, thyroid, liver and stomach were the top five cancer types, accounting for 57.42% of new cancer cases. Cancers of the lung, liver, stomach, colon-rectum and esophagus were the five leading causes of cancer deaths, accounting for 67.50% of total cancer deaths. The crude rate and age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR) were 341.75 per 100,000 and 201.61 per 100,000, respectively. The crude mortality rate was 182.34 per 100,000 and the age-standardized mortality rate (ASMR) was 96.47 per 100,000. The ASIR of all cancers combined increased by approximately 1.4% per year during 2000–2018, while the ASMR decreased by approximately 1.3% per year. We observed decreasing trends in ASIR and ASMR for cancers of the esophagus, stomach, and liver, whereas the ASIR increased significantly for cancers of the thyroid, prostate, and cervix.

Conclusions

Cancer remains a major public health concern in China, with a cancer profile that reflects the coexistence of developed and developing regions. Sustained implementation of prevention and control measures has resulted in significant reductions in the incidence and mortality rates of certain historically high incidence cancers, such as esophageal, stomach and liver cancers. Adherence to the guidelines of the Healthy China Action Plan and the Cancer Prevention and Control Action Plan, along with continued efforts in comprehensive risk factor control, cancer screening, early diagnosis and treatment, and standardization of diagnostic and therapeutic protocols, are key strategies to effectively mitigate the increasing cancer burden by 2030.

背景中国国家癌症中心(NCC)定期发布全国癌症发病率和死亡率统计数据。国际癌症研究机构(IARC)每两年计算并公布一次世界各国的癌症负担。为确保中国实际监测数据与IARC公布数据的一致性,国家癌症中心经国家卫生健康委员会和IARC批准,在《GLOBOCAN 2022》中同步发布中国癌症负担数据。方法2018年全国共有700个登记处报告了高质量的癌症发病和死亡数据,其中2010年至2018年连续监测的登记处有106个,建立年龄-时期-队列模型模拟癌症发病和死亡趋势,估算2022年中国癌症发病和死亡情况。此外,我们还利用 22 个连续性癌症登记数据分析了 2000 年至 2018 年年龄标准化癌症发病率和死亡率的时间趋势。肺癌、结肠直肠癌、甲状腺癌、肝癌和胃癌位居前五位,占新增癌症病例的 57.42%。肺癌、肝癌、胃癌、结肠直肠癌和食道癌是癌症死亡的五大主要原因,占癌症死亡总数的 67.50%。粗发病率和年龄标准化发病率(ASIR)分别为每 10 万人 341.75 例和 201.61 例。粗死亡率为每 10 万人 182.34 例,年龄标准化死亡率为每 10 万人 96.47 例。2000-2018年期间,所有癌症的ASIR总和每年上升约1.4%,而ASMR每年下降约1.3%。我们观察到食管癌、胃癌和肝癌的ASIR和ASMR呈下降趋势,而甲状腺癌、前列腺癌和宫颈癌的ASIR则显著上升。通过持续实施防控措施,食管癌、胃癌和肝癌等一些历史高发癌症的发病率和死亡率显著下降。坚持《健康中国行动计划》和《癌症预防控制行动计划》的指导方针,继续努力开展综合危险因素控制、癌症筛查、早期诊断和治疗,以及诊断和治疗方案的标准化,是到 2030 年有效减轻日益加重的癌症负担的关键战略。
{"title":"Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2022","authors":"Bingfeng Han ,&nbsp;Rongshou Zheng ,&nbsp;Hongmei Zeng ,&nbsp;Shaoming Wang ,&nbsp;Kexin Sun ,&nbsp;Ru Chen ,&nbsp;Li Li ,&nbsp;Wenqiang Wei ,&nbsp;Jie He","doi":"10.1016/j.jncc.2024.01.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jncc.2024.01.006","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The National Cancer Center (NCC) of China regularly reports the nationwide statistics on cancer incidence and mortality in China. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) calculates and publishes the cancer burden of countries around the world every two years. To ensure consistency between the actual surveillance data in China and the data published by IARC, NCC has received approval from the National Health Commission and IARC to simultaneously release the cancer burden data for China in GLOBOCAN 2022.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>There were a total of 700 registries reporting high-quality data on cancer incidence and mortality across China in 2018, of which 106 registries with continuous monitoring from 2010 to 2018 were used to establish an age-period-cohort model to simulate the trend of cancer incidence and mortality and to estimate the incidence and mortality in China in 2022. In addition, we analyzed the temporal trends of age-standardized cancer incidence and mortality from 2000 to 2018 using data from 22 continuous cancer registries.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>It was estimated about 4,824,700 new cancer cases and 2,574,200 new cancer deaths occurred in China in 2022. Cancers of the lung, colon-rectum, thyroid, liver and stomach were the top five cancer types, accounting for 57.42% of new cancer cases. Cancers of the lung, liver, stomach, colon-rectum and esophagus were the five leading causes of cancer deaths, accounting for 67.50% of total cancer deaths. The crude rate and age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR) were 341.75 per 100,000 and 201.61 per 100,000, respectively. The crude mortality rate was 182.34 per 100,000 and the age-standardized mortality rate (ASMR) was 96.47 per 100,000. The ASIR of all cancers combined increased by approximately 1.4% per year during 2000–2018, while the ASMR decreased by approximately 1.3% per year. We observed decreasing trends in ASIR and ASMR for cancers of the esophagus, stomach, and liver, whereas the ASIR increased significantly for cancers of the thyroid, prostate, and cervix.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Cancer remains a major public health concern in China, with a cancer profile that reflects the coexistence of developed and developing regions. Sustained implementation of prevention and control measures has resulted in significant reductions in the incidence and mortality rates of certain historically high incidence cancers, such as esophageal, stomach and liver cancers. Adherence to the guidelines of the Healthy China Action Plan and the Cancer Prevention and Control Action Plan, along with continued efforts in comprehensive risk factor control, cancer screening, early diagnosis and treatment, and standardization of diagnostic and therapeutic protocols, are key strategies to effectively mitigate the increasing cancer burden by 2030.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Center","volume":"4 1","pages":"Pages 47-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667005424000061/pdfft?md5=476239329acfd49eee62814ca1604208&pid=1-s2.0-S2667005424000061-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139884006","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Circulating tumor DNA as prognostic markers of relapsed breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis 作为复发乳腺癌预后标志物的循环肿瘤 DNA (ctDNA):系统综述和荟萃分析
Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2024.01.003
Na'na Guo , Qingxin Zhou , Xiaowei Chen , Baoqi Zeng , Shanshan Wu , Hongmei Zeng , Feng Sun

Objective

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is increasingly being used as a potential prognosis biomarker in patients of breast cancer. This review aims to assess the clinical value of ctDNA in outcome prediction in breast cancer patients throughout the whole treatment cycle.

Methods

PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and clinical trials.gov were searched from January 2016 to May 2022. Conference abstracts published in last three years were also included. The following search terms were used: ctDNA OR circulating tumor DNA AND breast cancer OR breast carcinoma. Only studies written in English languages were included. The following pre-specified criteria should be met for inclusion: (1) observational studies (prospective or retrospective), randomized control trials, case-control studies and case series studies; (2) patients with breast cancer; (3) ctDNA measurement; (4) clinical outcome data such as objective response rate (ORR), pathological complete response (pCR), relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and so on. The random-effect model was preferred considering the potential heterogeneity across studies. The primary outcomes included postoperative short-term outcomes (ORR and pCR) and postoperative long-term outcomes (RFS, OS, and relapse). Secondary outcomes focused on ctDNA detection rate.

Results

A total of 30 studies, comprising of 19 cohort studies, 2 case-control studies and 9 case series studies were included. The baseline ctDNA was significantly negatively associated with ORR outcome (Relative Risk [RR] = 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.50–0.83), with lower ORR in the ctDNA-positive group than ctDNA-negative group. ctDNA during neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) treatment was significantly associated with pCR outcomes (Odds Ratio [OR] = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.04–0.54). The strong association between ctDNA and RFS or relapse outcome was significant across the whole treatment period, especially after the surgery (RFS: Hazard Ratio [HR] = 6.74, 95% CI: 3.73–12.17; relapse outcome: RR = 7.11, 95% CI: 3.05–16.53), although there was heterogeneity in these results. Pre-operative and post-operative ctDNA measurements were significantly associated with OS outcomes (pre-operative: HR = 2.03, 95% CI: 1.12–3.70; post-operative: HR = 6.03, 95% CI: 1.31–27.78).

Conclusions

In this review, ctDNA measurements at different timepoints are correlated with evaluation indexes at different periods after treatment. The ctDNA can be used as an early potential postoperative prognosis biomarker in breast cancer, and also as a reference index to evaluate the therapeutic effect at different stages.

目的循环肿瘤 DNA(ctDNA)越来越多地被用作乳腺癌患者潜在的预后生物标志物。本综述旨在评估ctDNA在乳腺癌患者整个治疗周期的预后预测中的临床价值。方法检索了2016年1月至2022年5月期间的PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、Cochrane Library、Scopus和clinical trials.gov。还包括过去三年中发表的会议摘要。使用了以下检索词:ctDNA 或循环肿瘤 DNA 和乳腺癌或乳腺癌。仅纳入以英语撰写的研究。纳入研究应符合以下预设标准:(1) 观察性研究(前瞻性或回顾性)、随机对照试验、病例对照研究和病例系列研究;(2) 乳腺癌患者;(3) ctDNA 测量;(4) 临床结果数据,如客观反应率 (ORR)、病理完全反应 (pCR)、无复发生存率 (RFS)、总生存率 (OS) 等。考虑到各研究之间可能存在异质性,因此首选随机效应模型。主要结果包括术后短期结果(ORR 和 pCR)和术后长期结果(RFS、OS 和复发)。结果 共纳入 30 项研究,包括 19 项队列研究、2 项病例对照研究和 9 项病例系列研究。基线ctDNA与ORR结果呈显著负相关(相对风险[RR] = 0.65,95%置信区间[CI]:0.50-0.83),ctDNA阳性组的ORR低于ctDNA阴性组。在整个治疗期间,尤其是手术后,ctDNA与RFS或复发结果之间的密切关系都很明显(RFS:危险比[HR] = 6.74,95% CI:3.73-12.17;复发结果:RR = 7.11,95% CI:3.73-12.17):RR=7.11,95% CI:3.05-16.53),尽管这些结果存在异质性。术前和术后的ctDNA测量结果与OS结果显著相关(术前:HR = 2.03,95% CI:1.12-3.70;术后:HR = 6.03,95% CI:1.31-27.78)。ctDNA可作为乳腺癌术后早期潜在的预后生物标志物,也可作为评估不同阶段治疗效果的参考指标。
{"title":"Circulating tumor DNA as prognostic markers of relapsed breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Na'na Guo ,&nbsp;Qingxin Zhou ,&nbsp;Xiaowei Chen ,&nbsp;Baoqi Zeng ,&nbsp;Shanshan Wu ,&nbsp;Hongmei Zeng ,&nbsp;Feng Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.jncc.2024.01.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jncc.2024.01.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is increasingly being used as a potential prognosis biomarker in patients of breast cancer. This review aims to assess the clinical value of ctDNA in outcome prediction in breast cancer patients throughout the whole treatment cycle.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and clinical trials.gov were searched from January 2016 to May 2022. Conference abstracts published in last three years were also included. The following search terms were used: ctDNA OR circulating tumor DNA AND breast cancer OR breast carcinoma. Only studies written in English languages were included. The following pre-specified criteria should be met for inclusion: (1) observational studies (prospective or retrospective), randomized control trials, case-control studies and case series studies; (2) patients with breast cancer; (3) ctDNA measurement; (4) clinical outcome data such as objective response rate (ORR), pathological complete response (pCR), relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and so on. The random-effect model was preferred considering the potential heterogeneity across studies. The primary outcomes included postoperative short-term outcomes (ORR and pCR) and postoperative long-term outcomes (RFS, OS, and relapse). Secondary outcomes focused on ctDNA detection rate.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 30 studies, comprising of 19 cohort studies, 2 case-control studies and 9 case series studies were included. The baseline ctDNA was significantly negatively associated with ORR outcome (Relative Risk [RR] = 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.50–0.83), with lower ORR in the ctDNA-positive group than ctDNA-negative group. ctDNA during neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) treatment was significantly associated with pCR outcomes (Odds Ratio [OR] = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.04–0.54). The strong association between ctDNA and RFS or relapse outcome was significant across the whole treatment period, especially after the surgery (RFS: Hazard Ratio [HR] = 6.74, 95% CI: 3.73–12.17; relapse outcome: RR = 7.11, 95% CI: 3.05–16.53), although there was heterogeneity in these results. Pre-operative and post-operative ctDNA measurements were significantly associated with OS outcomes (pre-operative: HR = 2.03, 95% CI: 1.12–3.70; post-operative: HR = 6.03, 95% CI: 1.31–27.78).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In this review, ctDNA measurements at different timepoints are correlated with evaluation indexes at different periods after treatment. The ctDNA can be used as an early potential postoperative prognosis biomarker in breast cancer, and also as a reference index to evaluate the therapeutic effect at different stages.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Center","volume":"4 1","pages":"Pages 63-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667005424000036/pdfft?md5=c426808e2efe4aa77a7110222956a6a4&pid=1-s2.0-S2667005424000036-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139634421","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The development and implementation of pathological parameters and molecular testing impact prognosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma 病理参数和分子检测的制定与实施对结直肠腺癌预后的影响
Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2024.02.001
Midie Xu , Yaqi Li , Yingxue Liu , Jinjia Chang , Changming Zhou , Weiwei Weng , Hui Sun , Cong Tan , Xin Wang , Xu Wang , Meng Zhang , Shujuan Ni , Lei Wang , Yu Yang , Xiaoyan Zhou , Junjie Peng , Dan Huang , Weiqi Sheng
<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aims to analyze how changes in pathological diagnosis practice and molecular detection technology have affected clinical outcomes for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients in Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective cohort study analyzed 21,141 pathologically confirmed CRC cases diagnosed at FUSCC from 2008 to 2020. Patients were divided into five groups for different analytical purposes: (1) the before vs. since 2014 groups to analyze the influence of the changes in the classification criteria of pT3 and pT4 staging on the survival of patients; (2) the partial vs. total mesorectal excision (TME) groups to analyze whether evaluation of completeness of the mesorectum have impact on the survival of patients; (3) the tumor deposit (TD)(+)N0 vs. TD(+)N1c groups to analyze the influence of the changes in the pN staging on the survival of patients with positive TD and negative regional lymph node metastasis (LNM); (4) the before vs. since 2013 groups to analyze the influence of the changes in the testing process of deficient mismatch repair on the survival of patients; and (5) the groups with vs. without RAS/BRAF gene mutation testing to analyze the influence of these testing on the survival of patients. Patients’ clinicopathological parameters, including age at diagnosis, sex, tumor size, location, differentiation, mucinous subtype, TD, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, tumor depth, LNM and distant metastasis, and tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, were compared between groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log rank method was performed for patients’ overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In pathological reports, there were three parameter changes that impacted patient outcomes. Firstly, changes in the pT staging criteria led to a shift of the ratio of patients with stage pT3 to stage pT4 from 1: 110.9 to 1: 0.26. In comparison to patients admitted before 2014 (<em>n</em> = 4,754), a significant difference in prognosis between pT3 and pT4 stages was observed since 2014 (<em>n</em> = 9,965). Secondly, we began to evaluate the completeness of the mesorectum since 2016. As a result, 91.0% of patients with low rectal cancer underwent TME (<em>n</em> = 4,111) surgery, and patients with TME had significantly better OS compared with partial mesorectal excision (PME, <em>n</em> = 409). Thirdly, we began to stage TD (+) LNM (-) as N1c since 2017. The results showed that N1c (<em>n</em> = 127) but not N0 (<em>n</em> = 39) can improve the prognosis of patients without LNM and distal metastasis. In molecular testing, there have been three and five iterations of updates regarding mismatch repair (MMR)/microsatellite instability (MSI) status and RAS/BRAF gene mutation detection, respectively. The standardization of MMR status testing has sharply decreased the proportion of deficient MMR (dMMR) patients (from
本研究旨在分析病理诊断实践和分子检测技术的变化如何影响复旦大学附属上海肿瘤防治中心(FUSCC)结直肠癌(CRC)患者的临床预后。方法本回顾性队列研究分析了2008年至2020年期间在FUSCC确诊的21141例病理确诊CRC病例。为了不同的分析目的,将患者分为五组:(1)2014年以前组与2014年以后组,分析pT3和pT4分期标准的变化对患者生存的影响;(2)部分直肠系膜切除术(TME)组与全直肠系膜切除术(TME)组,分析直肠系膜完整性评价是否对患者生存有影响;(3)肿瘤沉积(TD)(+)N0组与肿瘤沉积(TD)(+)N1c组,分析肿瘤沉积(TD)(+)N0对患者生存的影响;(4)肿瘤沉积(TD)(+)N1c组,分析肿瘤沉积(TD)(+)N1c对患者生存的影响。TD(+)N1c组,分析pN分期的变化对TD阳性、区域淋巴结转移(LNM)阴性患者生存期的影响;(4)2013年以前组与2013年以后组,分析错配修复缺陷检测流程的变化对患者生存期的影响;(5)有RAS/BRAF基因突变检测组与无RAS/BRAF基因突变检测组,分析这些检测对患者生存期的影响。比较各组患者的临床病理参数,包括确诊年龄、性别、肿瘤大小、位置、分化、粘液亚型、TD、淋巴管侵犯、神经周围侵犯、肿瘤深度、LNM和远处转移以及肿瘤-结-转移(TNM)分期。结果 在病理报告中,有三个参数的变化影响了患者的预后。首先,pT 分期标准的变化导致 pT3 期与 pT4 期患者的比例从 1:110.9 变为 1:0.26。与 2014 年前入院的患者(n = 4754)相比,2014 年后入院的 pT3 期和 pT4 期患者(n = 9965)在预后方面出现了显著差异。其次,我们从2016年开始评估直肠中膜的完整性。结果,91.0%的低位直肠癌患者接受了TME手术(n = 4,111),与部分直肠系膜切除术(PME,n = 409)相比,TME患者的OS明显更好。第三,我们从2017年开始将TD(+)LNM(-)分期为N1c。结果显示,N1c(n = 127)而非 N0(n = 39)可以改善无 LNM 和远端转移患者的预后。在分子检测方面,关于错配修复(MMR)/微卫星不稳定性(MSI)状态和RAS/BRAF基因突变检测的更新分别经历了三次和五次迭代。自2013年以来,MMR状态检测的标准化使MMR缺陷(dMMR)患者的比例急剧下降(从32.5%降至7.4%)。2013年以来接受MMR状态检测的患者(n = 867)的预后明显优于2013年以前的患者(n = 1 313)。此外,检测RAS/BRAF基因突变状态(n = 5,041)可改善I-III期患者(n = 16,557)的DFS,但不能改善OS。结论在过去的几十年中,病理报告中元素的更新以及MMR/MSI状态和RAS/BRAF基因突变标准化检测的发展显著改善了患者的预后。
{"title":"The development and implementation of pathological parameters and molecular testing impact prognosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma","authors":"Midie Xu ,&nbsp;Yaqi Li ,&nbsp;Yingxue Liu ,&nbsp;Jinjia Chang ,&nbsp;Changming Zhou ,&nbsp;Weiwei Weng ,&nbsp;Hui Sun ,&nbsp;Cong Tan ,&nbsp;Xin Wang ,&nbsp;Xu Wang ,&nbsp;Meng Zhang ,&nbsp;Shujuan Ni ,&nbsp;Lei Wang ,&nbsp;Yu Yang ,&nbsp;Xiaoyan Zhou ,&nbsp;Junjie Peng ,&nbsp;Dan Huang ,&nbsp;Weiqi Sheng","doi":"10.1016/j.jncc.2024.02.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jncc.2024.02.001","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Objective&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;This study aims to analyze how changes in pathological diagnosis practice and molecular detection technology have affected clinical outcomes for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients in Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;This retrospective cohort study analyzed 21,141 pathologically confirmed CRC cases diagnosed at FUSCC from 2008 to 2020. Patients were divided into five groups for different analytical purposes: (1) the before vs. since 2014 groups to analyze the influence of the changes in the classification criteria of pT3 and pT4 staging on the survival of patients; (2) the partial vs. total mesorectal excision (TME) groups to analyze whether evaluation of completeness of the mesorectum have impact on the survival of patients; (3) the tumor deposit (TD)(+)N0 vs. TD(+)N1c groups to analyze the influence of the changes in the pN staging on the survival of patients with positive TD and negative regional lymph node metastasis (LNM); (4) the before vs. since 2013 groups to analyze the influence of the changes in the testing process of deficient mismatch repair on the survival of patients; and (5) the groups with vs. without RAS/BRAF gene mutation testing to analyze the influence of these testing on the survival of patients. Patients’ clinicopathological parameters, including age at diagnosis, sex, tumor size, location, differentiation, mucinous subtype, TD, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, tumor depth, LNM and distant metastasis, and tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, were compared between groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log rank method was performed for patients’ overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) analyses.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;In pathological reports, there were three parameter changes that impacted patient outcomes. Firstly, changes in the pT staging criteria led to a shift of the ratio of patients with stage pT3 to stage pT4 from 1: 110.9 to 1: 0.26. In comparison to patients admitted before 2014 (&lt;em&gt;n&lt;/em&gt; = 4,754), a significant difference in prognosis between pT3 and pT4 stages was observed since 2014 (&lt;em&gt;n&lt;/em&gt; = 9,965). Secondly, we began to evaluate the completeness of the mesorectum since 2016. As a result, 91.0% of patients with low rectal cancer underwent TME (&lt;em&gt;n&lt;/em&gt; = 4,111) surgery, and patients with TME had significantly better OS compared with partial mesorectal excision (PME, &lt;em&gt;n&lt;/em&gt; = 409). Thirdly, we began to stage TD (+) LNM (-) as N1c since 2017. The results showed that N1c (&lt;em&gt;n&lt;/em&gt; = 127) but not N0 (&lt;em&gt;n&lt;/em&gt; = 39) can improve the prognosis of patients without LNM and distal metastasis. In molecular testing, there have been three and five iterations of updates regarding mismatch repair (MMR)/microsatellite instability (MSI) status and RAS/BRAF gene mutation detection, respectively. The standardization of MMR status testing has sharply decreased the proportion of deficient MMR (dMMR) patients (from ","PeriodicalId":73987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Center","volume":"4 1","pages":"Pages 74-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667005424000073/pdfft?md5=9884d103f18f07d0cc296a30ae7fe3c7&pid=1-s2.0-S2667005424000073-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139876528","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Deep learning model based on primary tumor to predict lymph node status in clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma: a multicenter study 基于原发肿瘤的深度学习模型预测临床IA期肺腺癌的淋巴结状态:一项多中心研究
IF 7.6 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2024.01.005
Li Zhang , Hailin Li , Shaohong Zhao , Xuemin Tao , Meng Li , Shouxin Yang , Lina Zhou , Mengwen Liu , Xue Zhang , Di Dong , Jie Tian , Ning Wu

Objective

To develop a deep learning model to predict lymph node (LN) status in clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma patients.

Methods

This diagnostic study included 1,009 patients with pathologically confirmed clinical stage T1N0M0 lung adenocarcinoma from two independent datasets (699 from Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and 310 from PLA General Hospital) between January 2005 and December 2019. The Cancer Hospital dataset was randomly split into a training cohort (559 patients) and a validation cohort (140 patients) to train and tune a deep learning model based on a deep residual network (ResNet). The PLA Hospital dataset was used as a testing cohort to evaluate the generalization ability of the model. Thoracic radiologists manually segmented tumors and interpreted high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) features for the model. The predictive performance was assessed by area under the curves (AUCs), accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. Subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate the potential bias of the study population.

Results

A total of 1,009 patients were included in this study; 409 (40.5%) were male and 600 (59.5%) were female. The median age was 57.0 years (inter-quartile range, IQR: 50.0–64.0). The deep learning model achieved AUCs of 0.906 (95% CI: 0.873–0.938) and 0.893 (95% CI: 0.857–0.930) for predicting pN0 disease in the testing cohort and a non-pure ground glass nodule (non-pGGN) testing cohort, respectively. No significant difference was detected between the testing cohort and the non-pGGN testing cohort (P = 0.622). The precisions of this model for predicting pN0 disease were 0.979 (95% CI: 0.963–0.995) and 0.983 (95% CI: 0.967–0.998) in the testing cohort and the non-pGGN testing cohort, respectively. The deep learning model achieved AUCs of 0.848 (95% CI: 0.798–0.898) and 0.831 (95% CI: 0.776–0.887) for predicting pN2 disease in the testing cohort and the non-pGGN testing cohort, respectively. No significant difference was detected between the testing cohort and the non-pGGN testing cohort (P = 0.657). The recalls of this model for predicting pN2 disease were 0.903 (95% CI: 0.870–0.936) and 0.931 (95% CI: 0.901–0.961) in the testing cohort and the non-pGGN testing cohort, respectively.

Conclusions

The superior performance of the deep learning model will help to target the extension of lymph node dissection and reduce the ineffective lymph node dissection in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma patients.

方法这项诊断研究纳入了2005年1月至2019年12月期间两个独立数据集(699例来自中国医学科学院肿瘤医院,310例来自中国人民解放军总医院)中1009例经病理确诊的临床分期为T1N0M0的肺腺癌患者。肿瘤医院数据集被随机分成训练队列(559 名患者)和验证队列(140 名患者),用于训练和调整基于深度残差网络(ResNet)的深度学习模型。解放军医院数据集被用作测试队列,以评估模型的泛化能力。胸部放射科医生为模型手动分割肿瘤并解释高分辨率计算机断层扫描(HRCT)特征。预测性能通过曲线下面积(AUC)、准确度、精确度、召回率和 F1 分数进行评估。本研究共纳入 1,009 名患者,其中男性 409 人(40.5%),女性 600 人(59.5%)。中位年龄为 57.0 岁(四分位数间距,IQR:50.0-64.0)。在测试队列和非纯磨碎玻璃结节(non-GGN)测试队列中,深度学习模型预测 pN0 疾病的 AUC 分别为 0.906(95% CI:0.873-0.938)和 0.893(95% CI:0.857-0.930)。检测队列与非纯磨玻璃结节检测队列之间未发现明显差异(P = 0.622)。该模型预测 pN0 疾病的精确度在测试队列和非纯纯 GGN 测试队列中分别为 0.979(95% CI:0.963-0.995)和 0.983(95% CI:0.967-0.998)。深度学习模型在测试队列和非GGN测试队列中预测pN2疾病的AUC分别为0.848(95% CI:0.798-0.898)和0.831(95% CI:0.776-0.887)。检测队列和非检测队列之间未发现明显差异(P = 0.657)。该模型预测 pN2 疾病的召回率在测试队列和非 GGGN 测试队列中分别为 0.903(95% CI:0.870-0.936)和 0.931(95% CI:0.901-0.961)。
{"title":"Deep learning model based on primary tumor to predict lymph node status in clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma: a multicenter study","authors":"Li Zhang ,&nbsp;Hailin Li ,&nbsp;Shaohong Zhao ,&nbsp;Xuemin Tao ,&nbsp;Meng Li ,&nbsp;Shouxin Yang ,&nbsp;Lina Zhou ,&nbsp;Mengwen Liu ,&nbsp;Xue Zhang ,&nbsp;Di Dong ,&nbsp;Jie Tian ,&nbsp;Ning Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.jncc.2024.01.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jncc.2024.01.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To develop a deep learning model to predict lymph node (LN) status in clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This diagnostic study included 1,009 patients with pathologically confirmed clinical stage T1N0M0 lung adenocarcinoma from two independent datasets (699 from Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and 310 from PLA General Hospital) between January 2005 and December 2019. The Cancer Hospital dataset was randomly split into a training cohort (559 patients) and a validation cohort (140 patients) to train and tune a deep learning model based on a deep residual network (ResNet). The PLA Hospital dataset was used as a testing cohort to evaluate the generalization ability of the model. Thoracic radiologists manually segmented tumors and interpreted high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) features for the model. The predictive performance was assessed by area under the curves (AUCs), accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. Subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate the potential bias of the study population.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 1,009 patients were included in this study; 409 (40.5%) were male and 600 (59.5%) were female. The median age was 57.0 years (inter-quartile range, IQR: 50.0–64.0). The deep learning model achieved AUCs of 0.906 (95% CI: 0.873–0.938) and 0.893 (95% CI: 0.857–0.930) for predicting pN0 disease in the testing cohort and a non-pure ground glass nodule (non-pGGN) testing cohort, respectively. No significant difference was detected between the testing cohort and the non-pGGN testing cohort (<em>P</em> = 0.622). The precisions of this model for predicting pN0 disease were 0.979 (95% CI: 0.963–0.995) and 0.983 (95% CI: 0.967–0.998) in the testing cohort and the non-pGGN testing cohort, respectively. The deep learning model achieved AUCs of 0.848 (95% CI: 0.798–0.898) and 0.831 (95% CI: 0.776–0.887) for predicting pN2 disease in the testing cohort and the non-pGGN testing cohort, respectively. No significant difference was detected between the testing cohort and the non-pGGN testing cohort (<em>P</em> = 0.657). The recalls of this model for predicting pN2 disease were 0.903 (95% CI: 0.870–0.936) and 0.931 (95% CI: 0.901–0.961) in the testing cohort and the non-pGGN testing cohort, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The superior performance of the deep learning model will help to target the extension of lymph node dissection and reduce the ineffective lymph node dissection in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Center","volume":"4 3","pages":"Pages 233-240"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266700542400005X/pdfft?md5=07e3c41e80da73446c9241c22399a44e&pid=1-s2.0-S266700542400005X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142048649","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of the National Cancer Center
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1