Pub Date : 2024-07-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.101980
Douglas E. Drachman MD, FSCAI (Chair) , Tayo Addo MD , Robert J. Applegate MD, MSCAI , Robert C. Bartel MSc, CAE , Anna E. Bortnick MD, PhD, MSc, FSCAI , Francesca M. Dea , Tarek Helmy MD, MSCAI , Timothy D. Henry MD, MSCAI , Adnan Khalif MD, FSCAI , Ajay J. Kirtane MD, SM, FSCAI , Michael Levy MD, MPH, FSCAI , Michael J. Lim MD, MSCAI , Ehtisham Mahmud MD, MSCAI , Nino Mihatov MD, FSCAI , Sahil A. Parikh MD, FSCAI , Laura Porter CMP , Abhiram Prasad MD , Sunil V. Rao MD, FSCAI , Louai Razzouk MD, MPH, FSCAI , Samit Shah MD, PhD, FSCAI , J. Dawn Abbott MD, FSCAI (Co-Chair)
The field of interventional cardiology (IC) has evolved dramatically over the past 40 years. Training and certification in IC have kept pace, with the development of accredited IC fellowship training programs, training statements, and subspecialty board certification. The application process, however, remained fragmented with lack of a universal process or time frame. In recent years, growing competition among training programs for the strongest candidates resulted in time-limited offers and high-pressure situations that disadvantaged candidates. A grassroots effort was recently undertaken by a Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions task force, to create equity in the system by establishing a national Match for IC fellowship. This manuscript explores the rationale, process, and implications of this endeavor.
在过去的 40 年中,介入心脏病学(IC)领域发生了翻天覆地的变化。随着经认可的介入心脏病学研究员培训计划、培训声明和亚专科委员会认证的发展,介入心脏病学的培训和认证也与时俱进。然而,申请过程仍然支离破碎,缺乏统一的流程或时间框架。近年来,培训项目之间为争取最优秀的候选人而展开的竞争日趋激烈,这导致了有时间限制的录取和对候选人不利的高压态势。最近,心血管血管造影和介入学会的一个特别工作组在基层开展了一项工作,通过建立一个全国性的 IC 奖学金 Match 来创造系统的公平性。本手稿探讨了这一努力的理由、过程和意义。
{"title":"The Path to a Match for Interventional Cardiology Fellowship: A Major SCAI Initiative","authors":"Douglas E. Drachman MD, FSCAI (Chair) , Tayo Addo MD , Robert J. Applegate MD, MSCAI , Robert C. Bartel MSc, CAE , Anna E. Bortnick MD, PhD, MSc, FSCAI , Francesca M. Dea , Tarek Helmy MD, MSCAI , Timothy D. Henry MD, MSCAI , Adnan Khalif MD, FSCAI , Ajay J. Kirtane MD, SM, FSCAI , Michael Levy MD, MPH, FSCAI , Michael J. Lim MD, MSCAI , Ehtisham Mahmud MD, MSCAI , Nino Mihatov MD, FSCAI , Sahil A. Parikh MD, FSCAI , Laura Porter CMP , Abhiram Prasad MD , Sunil V. Rao MD, FSCAI , Louai Razzouk MD, MPH, FSCAI , Samit Shah MD, PhD, FSCAI , J. Dawn Abbott MD, FSCAI (Co-Chair)","doi":"10.1016/j.jscai.2024.101980","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jscai.2024.101980","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The field of interventional cardiology (IC) has evolved dramatically over the past 40 years. Training and certification in IC have kept pace, with the development of accredited IC fellowship training programs, training statements, and subspecialty board certification. The application process, however, remained fragmented with lack of a universal process or time frame. In recent years, growing competition among training programs for the strongest candidates resulted in time-limited offers and high-pressure situations that disadvantaged candidates. A grassroots effort was recently undertaken by a Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions task force, to create equity in the system by establishing a national Match for IC fellowship. This manuscript explores the rationale, process, and implications of this endeavor.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73990,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions","volume":"3 7","pages":"Article 101980"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11307460/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141918268","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.101861
{"title":"Temporal Trends in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Isolated Severe Aortic Stenosis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jscai.2024.101861","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jscai.2024.101861","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73990,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions","volume":"3 7","pages":"Article 101861"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772930324007105/pdfft?md5=db730200bbc0a84fc9ccdcfae98945c9&pid=1-s2.0-S2772930324007105-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140766505","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102146
Background
The choice of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) prosthesis is crucial in optimizing short- and long-term outcomes. The objective of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis comparing outcomes of third-generation balloon-expandable valves (BEV) vs self-expanding valves (SEV).
Methods
Electronic databases were searched from inception to June 2023 for studies comparing third-generation BEV vs SEV. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included clinical and hemodynamic end points. Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs) or weighted mean differences (WMDs).
Results
The meta-analysis included 16 studies and 10,174 patients (BEV, 5753 and SEV, 4421). There were no significant differences in 1-year all-cause mortality (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.89-1.48) between third-generation BEV vs SEV. TAVR with third generation BEV was associated with a significantly lower risk of TIA/stroke (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44-0.87), permanent pacemaker implantation (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.44-0.70), and ≥moderate paravalvular leak (PVL, OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.25-0.75), and higher risk of ≥moderate patient-prosthesis mismatch (OR, 3.76; 95% CI, 2.33-6.05), higher mean gradient (WMD, 4.35; 95% CI, 3.63-5.08), and smaller effective orifice area (WMD, −0.30; 95% CI, −0.37 to −0.23), compared with SEV.
Conclusion
In this meta-analysis, TAVR with third-generation BEV vs SEV was associated with similar all-cause mortality, lower risk of TIA/stroke, permanent pacemaker implantation, and ≥moderate PVL, but higher risk of ≥moderate patient-prosthesis mismatch, higher mean gradient, and smaller effective orifice area. Large, adequately powered randomized trials are needed to evaluate long-term outcomes of TAVR with latest generations of BEV vs SEV.
{"title":"Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Using Third-Generation Balloon-Expandable Versus Self-Expanding Valves: A Meta-analysis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102146","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102146","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The choice of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) prosthesis is crucial in optimizing short- and long-term outcomes. The objective of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis comparing outcomes of third-generation balloon-expandable valves (BEV) vs self-expanding valves (SEV).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Electronic databases were searched from inception to June 2023 for studies comparing third-generation BEV vs SEV. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included clinical and hemodynamic end points. Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs) or weighted mean differences (WMDs).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The meta-analysis included 16 studies and 10,174 patients (BEV, 5753 and SEV, 4421). There were no significant differences in 1-year all-cause mortality (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.89-1.48) between third-generation BEV vs SEV. TAVR with third generation BEV was associated with a significantly lower risk of TIA/stroke (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44-0.87), permanent pacemaker implantation (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.44-0.70), and ≥moderate paravalvular leak (PVL, OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.25-0.75), and higher risk of ≥moderate patient-prosthesis mismatch (OR, 3.76; 95% CI, 2.33-6.05), higher mean gradient (WMD, 4.35; 95% CI, 3.63-5.08), and smaller effective orifice area (WMD, −0.30; 95% CI, −0.37 to −0.23), compared with SEV.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In this meta-analysis, TAVR with third-generation BEV vs SEV was associated with similar all-cause mortality, lower risk of TIA/stroke, permanent pacemaker implantation, and ≥moderate PVL, but higher risk of ≥moderate patient-prosthesis mismatch, higher mean gradient, and smaller effective orifice area. Large, adequately powered randomized trials are needed to evaluate long-term outcomes of TAVR with latest generations of BEV vs SEV.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73990,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions","volume":"3 7","pages":"Article 102146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772930324013693/pdfft?md5=b1bb3c02c7527fd49f27cd35c6eb0fcb&pid=1-s2.0-S2772930324013693-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141142287","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.101928
Background
In complex bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention, 2-stent strategies are often required. Commonly used 2-stent techniques can lead to suboptimal results due to their complexity. We developed the balloon-assisted double-kissing T-stenting (DKT) technique, which uses balloons to optimize stent placement, delivery, and final architecture.
Methods
With the balloon-assisted DKT technique, a balloon is inflated into the main branch (MB) to identify the best position of the side-branch (SB) stent instead of relying on angiography. DKT aims at supporting the SB ostium with stent crowns instead of distorted open cell(s), by achieving a longitudinal deformation with minimal crush of the SB stent upon implantation of the MB stent. This hypothesis was tested on a bench model. We report how the technique was performed in 2 cases and provide intracoronary imaging of the results.
Results
As hypothesized, DKT resulted in a longitudinal accordion-like deformation and minimal crush effect on bench. The SB ostium was supported by stent crowns. The SB wall opposed to the carina was well covered with crowns from the MB stent after proximal optimization technique and final kissing. The technique was successfully used in 2 complex left main cases with perfect coverage of the SB ostium as assessed with intracoronary imaging.
Conclusions
The balloon-assisted DKT is a simple technique that combines strengths of double-kissing crush and culotte techniques, results in appropriate SB ostium coverage, and deserves further investigation.
{"title":"The Balloon-Assisted Double-Kissing T-Stenting Technique: Concept, In Vitro Model, and Case Examples","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jscai.2024.101928","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jscai.2024.101928","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In complex bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention, 2-stent strategies are often required. Commonly used 2-stent techniques can lead to suboptimal results due to their complexity. We developed the balloon-assisted double-kissing T-stenting (DKT) technique, which uses balloons to optimize stent placement, delivery, and final architecture.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>With the balloon-assisted DKT technique, a balloon is inflated into the main branch (MB) to identify the best position of the side-branch (SB) stent instead of relying on angiography. DKT aims at supporting the SB ostium with stent crowns instead of distorted open cell(s), by achieving a longitudinal deformation with minimal crush of the SB stent upon implantation of the MB stent. This hypothesis was tested on a bench model. We report how the technique was performed in 2 cases and provide intracoronary imaging of the results.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>As hypothesized, DKT resulted in a longitudinal accordion-like deformation and minimal crush effect on bench. The SB ostium was supported by stent crowns. The SB wall opposed to the carina was well covered with crowns from the MB stent after proximal optimization technique and final kissing. The technique was successfully used in 2 complex left main cases with perfect coverage of the SB ostium as assessed with intracoronary imaging.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The balloon-assisted DKT is a simple technique that combines strengths of double-kissing crush and culotte techniques, results in appropriate SB ostium coverage, and deserves further investigation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73990,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions","volume":"3 7","pages":"Article 101928"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772930324008226/pdfft?md5=17aca5f037753c7c72330f9e1f8fd91f&pid=1-s2.0-S2772930324008226-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140405838","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.101935
Background
Acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Little is known regarding the role of leukocyte trajectory in prognosis.
Methods
We included adult acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection patients with emergency frozen elephant trunk and total arch replacement in 2 cardiovascular centers (2020-2022). We used latent class mixed model to group patients according to their leukocyte patterns from hospital admission to the first 5 days after surgery. We investigated the association of leukocyte trajectory and 30-day and latest follow-up mortality (October 31, 2023), exploratorily analyzing the effects of ulinastatin treatment on outcome.
Results
Of 255 patients included, 3 distinct leukocyte trajectories were identified: 196 in group I (decreasing trajectory), 34 in group II (stable trajectory), and 25 in group III (rising trajectory). Overall, 30-day mortality was 25 (9.8%), ranging from 8.2% (16/196) in group I, 8.8% (3/34) in group II, to 24.0% (6/25) in group III (P for trend = .036). Group III was associated with higher mortality both at 30 days (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.260; 95% CI, 1.071-9.919; P = .037) and at the last follow-up (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.840; 95% CI, 1.098-7.345; P = .031) compared with group I.
Conclusions
Distinct and clinically relevant groups can be identified by analyzing leukocyte trajectories, and a rising trajectory was associated with higher short-term and midterm mortality.
{"title":"Inflammatory Trajectory and Anti-Inflammatory Pharmacotherapy in Frozen Elephant Trunk-Treated Acute Type I Aortic Dissection","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jscai.2024.101935","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jscai.2024.101935","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Little is known regarding the role of leukocyte trajectory in prognosis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We included adult acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection patients with emergency frozen elephant trunk and total arch replacement in 2 cardiovascular centers (2020-2022). We used latent class mixed model to group patients according to their leukocyte patterns from hospital admission to the first 5 days after surgery. We investigated the association of leukocyte trajectory and 30-day and latest follow-up mortality (October 31, 2023), exploratorily analyzing the effects of ulinastatin treatment on outcome.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 255 patients included, 3 distinct leukocyte trajectories were identified: 196 in group I (decreasing trajectory), 34 in group II (stable trajectory), and 25 in group III (rising trajectory). Overall, 30-day mortality was 25 (9.8%), ranging from 8.2% (16/196) in group I, 8.8% (3/34) in group II, to 24.0% (6/25) in group III (<em>P</em> for trend = .036). Group III was associated with higher mortality both at 30 days (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.260; 95% CI, 1.071-9.919; <em>P</em> = .037) and at the last follow-up (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.840; 95% CI, 1.098-7.345; <em>P</em> = .031) compared with group I.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Distinct and clinically relevant groups can be identified by analyzing leukocyte trajectories, and a rising trajectory was associated with higher short-term and midterm mortality.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73990,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions","volume":"3 7","pages":"Article 101935"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772930324008305/pdfft?md5=365cd57395a2c89f1e6e4fa67eda51c9&pid=1-s2.0-S2772930324008305-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140772711","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.101859
Background
Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) comprise more than a quarter of all patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and are at higher risk of adverse events. We sought to reexamine the optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) postpercutaneous coronary intervention in patients with DM.
Methods
We systematically included randomized controlled trials comparing any 2 of 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of DAPT that reported major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), net adverse clinical events (NACE), bleeding, or stent thrombosis in DM, and performed a frequentist network meta-analysis. We also performed a sensitivity analysis of trials that exclusively enrolled patients with acute coronary syndrome.
Results
In 16 randomized controlled trials comprising 16,376 adults with DM, there was no significant difference in NACE, MACE, stent thrombosis, or major bleeding between pairwise comparisons of 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of DAPT, except for a signal for lower bleeding with 3 months of DAPT compared to 12 (risk ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.51-0.99). Sensitivity analysis of trials that solely included acute coronary syndrome similarly showed no significant difference in MACE between 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of DAPT.
Conclusions
Our study found no meaningful difference in NACE or MACE between pairwise comparisons of 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of DAPT by study-level meta-analysis of patients with DM, with lower bleeding risk observed with 3 months than with 12 months of DAPT. This finding may provide clinicians greater flexibility to personalize patients’ DAPT duration based on other non-DM comorbidities that might affect bleeding or thrombosis risk.
{"title":"Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jscai.2024.101859","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jscai.2024.101859","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) comprise more than a quarter of all patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and are at higher risk of adverse events. We sought to reexamine the optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) postpercutaneous coronary intervention in patients with DM.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We systematically included randomized controlled trials comparing any 2 of 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of DAPT that reported major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), net adverse clinical events (NACE), bleeding, or stent thrombosis in DM, and performed a frequentist network meta-analysis. We also performed a sensitivity analysis of trials that exclusively enrolled patients with acute coronary syndrome.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In 16 randomized controlled trials comprising 16,376 adults with DM, there was no significant difference in NACE, MACE, stent thrombosis, or major bleeding between pairwise comparisons of 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of DAPT, except for a signal for lower bleeding with 3 months of DAPT compared to 12 (risk ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.51-0.99). Sensitivity analysis of trials that solely included acute coronary syndrome similarly showed no significant difference in MACE between 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of DAPT.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our study found no meaningful difference in NACE or MACE between pairwise comparisons of 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of DAPT by study-level meta-analysis of patients with DM, with lower bleeding risk observed with 3 months than with 12 months of DAPT. This finding may provide clinicians greater flexibility to personalize patients’ DAPT duration based on other non-DM comorbidities that might affect bleeding or thrombosis risk.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73990,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions","volume":"3 7","pages":"Article 101859"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772930324007087/pdfft?md5=13519487c1d0121e4142e47aa1d302fe&pid=1-s2.0-S2772930324007087-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140281836","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102141
{"title":"The Sideclose Technique: A Novel Method for Achieving Hemostasis With an Indwelling Impella CP","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102141","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102141","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73990,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions","volume":"3 7","pages":"Article 102141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772930324013632/pdfft?md5=61dc00961811b5536d4af2d71933c2f7&pid=1-s2.0-S2772930324013632-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141142098","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01DOI: 10.1016/S2772-9303(24)01541-2
{"title":"Cover","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S2772-9303(24)01541-2","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2772-9303(24)01541-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73990,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions","volume":"3 7","pages":"Article 102204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772930324015412/pdfft?md5=73d236fb1e1a057e5979a5827448b32a&pid=1-s2.0-S2772930324015412-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141852700","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102148
{"title":"Performance of a Novel Miniaturized Robotic System in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Preclinical Study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102148","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102148","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73990,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions","volume":"3 7","pages":"Article 102148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772930324013711/pdfft?md5=61a708c86c3258d9dc401f4e24701036&pid=1-s2.0-S2772930324013711-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141134601","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}