首页 > 最新文献

JTCVS open最新文献

英文 中文
Margin-negative resection and long-term survival following robot-assisted thymectomy for thymoma: A tumor size stratified analysis 胸腺瘤机器人辅助胸腺切除术后边缘阴性切除和长期生存:肿瘤大小分层分析
IF 1.9 Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2025.10.038
Sara Sakowitz MD, MPH, MBA , Syed Shahyan Bakhtiyar MD, MBE , Yas Sanaiha MD , Saad Mallick MD , Peyman Benharash MD , Jane Yanagawa MD

Objective

Although open thymectomy has traditionally been the gold standard for resection of large thymic tumors, growing evidence has suggested minimally invasive thymectomy to confer comparable survival. However, the influence of incremental increases in tumor size on margin-negative resection and long-term survival following minimally invasive thymectomy remains understudied.

Methods

All patients aged 18 years and older who underwent thymectomy for Stage I through III thymoma were tabulated from the 2010-2022 National Cancer Database. Those undergoing thoracoscopic or robotic procedures comprised the video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) cohorts, respectively (others: open thymectomy). Tumor size was stratified as ≤4 cm, 4 to 6 cm, 6 to 8 cm, and >8 cm.

Results

Of 5132 patients, 2562 (50%) underwent open thymectomy, 692 (13%) VATS, and 1878 (37%) RATS. Overall, 48% of neoplasms ≤4 cm were performed using RATS, compared with 41% of 4 to 6 cm, 34% of 6 to 8 cm, and 18% of >8 cm in size. Following doubly robust risk-adjustment, RATS remained associated with significantly higher odds of achieving R0 for tumors ≤4 cm (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.78; 95% CI, 1.03-3.10), and equivalent likelihood for neoplasms 4 to 6 cm (AOR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.63-1.60), 6 to 8 cm (AOR, 1.55; 95% CI, 0.87-2.76), and >8 cm (AOR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.40-1.47; Reference category: open thymectomy). Among tumors ≤8 cm, VATS was linked with similar R0 odds as open thymectomy. Comparable survival was observed at 5 and 10 years across operative approaches and size strata.

Conclusions

Utilization of RATS has rapidly increased since 2010. Relative to open thymectomy, RATS was associated with at least noninferior likelihood of achieving R0 for lesions ≤4 cm, and equivalent odds for tumors >4 cm, as well as comparable survival. Our findings underscore the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive thymectomy for appropriately selected larger thymomas.
虽然开放胸腺切除术传统上是切除大胸腺肿瘤的金标准,但越来越多的证据表明微创胸腺切除术可获得相当的生存率。然而,肿瘤大小的增加对边缘阴性切除和微创胸腺切除术后长期生存的影响仍未得到充分研究。方法收集2010-2022年美国国家癌症数据库中所有年龄在18岁及以上,因I期至III期胸腺瘤而行胸腺切除术的患者。接受胸腔镜或机器人手术的患者分别分为视频辅助胸外科(VATS)组和机器人辅助胸外科(RATS)组(其他:开放式胸腺切除术)。肿瘤大小分为≤4cm、4 ~ 6cm、6 ~ 8cm、>; 8cm。结果5132例患者中,2562例(50%)行开放胸腺切除术,692例(13%)行VATS, 1878例(37%)行RATS。总体而言,48%的≤4cm的肿瘤采用rat进行手术,相比之下,大小为4 - 6cm的为41%,6 - 8cm的为34%,8cm的为18%。经过双重稳健性风险调整后,对于≤4 cm的肿瘤,大鼠获得R0的几率仍然显著较高(调整优势比[AOR], 1.78; 95% CI, 1.03-3.10),对于4 - 6 cm的肿瘤(AOR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.63-1.60)、6 - 8 cm的肿瘤(AOR, 1.55; 95% CI, 0.87-2.76)和8 cm的肿瘤(AOR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.40-1.47;参考类别:开放式胸腺切除术),大鼠获得R0的几率也显著较高。在≤8 cm的肿瘤中,VATS与开放胸腺切除术的R0比值相似。5年和10年的生存率在不同的手术入路和不同的年龄层观察到相当。结论自2010年以来,rat的使用率迅速上升。相对于开放胸腺切除术,对于病变≤4cm的大鼠达到R0的可能性至少不低,对于肿瘤≤4cm的大鼠达到R0的可能性相等,并且生存率相当。我们的研究结果强调了微创胸腺切除术对适当选择的较大胸腺瘤的安全性和有效性。
{"title":"Margin-negative resection and long-term survival following robot-assisted thymectomy for thymoma: A tumor size stratified analysis","authors":"Sara Sakowitz MD, MPH, MBA ,&nbsp;Syed Shahyan Bakhtiyar MD, MBE ,&nbsp;Yas Sanaiha MD ,&nbsp;Saad Mallick MD ,&nbsp;Peyman Benharash MD ,&nbsp;Jane Yanagawa MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xjon.2025.10.038","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xjon.2025.10.038","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Although open thymectomy has traditionally been the gold standard for resection of large thymic tumors, growing evidence has suggested minimally invasive thymectomy to confer comparable survival. However, the influence of incremental increases in tumor size on margin-negative resection and long-term survival following minimally invasive thymectomy remains understudied.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All patients aged 18 years and older who underwent thymectomy for Stage I through III thymoma were tabulated from the 2010-2022 National Cancer Database. Those undergoing thoracoscopic or robotic procedures comprised the video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) cohorts, respectively (others: open thymectomy). Tumor size was stratified as ≤4 cm, 4 to 6 cm, 6 to 8 cm, and &gt;8 cm.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 5132 patients, 2562 (50%) underwent open thymectomy, 692 (13%) VATS, and 1878 (37%) RATS. Overall, 48% of neoplasms ≤4 cm were performed using RATS, compared with 41% of 4 to 6 cm, 34% of 6 to 8 cm, and 18% of &gt;8 cm in size. Following doubly robust risk-adjustment, RATS remained associated with significantly higher odds of achieving R0 for tumors ≤4 cm (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.78; 95% CI, 1.03-3.10), and equivalent likelihood for neoplasms 4 to 6 cm (AOR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.63-1.60), 6 to 8 cm (AOR, 1.55; 95% CI, 0.87-2.76), and &gt;8 cm (AOR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.40-1.47; Reference category: open thymectomy). Among tumors ≤8 cm, VATS was linked with similar R0 odds as open thymectomy. Comparable survival was observed at 5 and 10 years across operative approaches and size strata.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Utilization of RATS has rapidly increased since 2010. Relative to open thymectomy, RATS was associated with at least noninferior likelihood of achieving R0 for lesions ≤4 cm, and equivalent odds for tumors &gt;4 cm, as well as comparable survival. Our findings underscore the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive thymectomy for appropriately selected larger thymomas.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74032,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS open","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 101534"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147412531","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
National race-based disparities in referral to Commission on Cancer centers for lung cancer resection 转介到癌症中心委员会进行肺癌切除术的国家种族差异
IF 1.9 Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2025.101544
Sara Sakowitz MD, MPH, MBA , Syed Shahyan Bakhtiyar MD, MBE , Yas Sanaiha MD , Konmal Ali BS , Peyman Benharash MD

Objective

Race-based disparities in lung cancer care are well described, such that Black patients face lower access to screening and early diagnosis, and inferior overall survival. We sought to examine race-based differences in referral to Commission on Cancer–accredited hospitals for pulmonary resection.

Methods

Within the National Cancer Database, we tabulated all patients aged 18 years or more of White or Black race diagnosed with stage IA non–small cell lung cancer who underwent definitive surgical resection from 2010 to 2022. Patients diagnosed at a separate institution from the operating facility were considered “referred,” and those diagnosed and treated at the same center were considered “nonreferred.” Hospitals in the top quartile by cumulative volume were considered high-volume centers (≥30 resections/year).

Results

Of 123,706 patients, 33,218 (27%) were referred for care. After risk adjustment, Black race remained associated with a lower likelihood of referral (adjusted odds ratio, 0.80, CI, 0.77-0.85). Moreover, among those referred, Black race was associated with reduced odds of referral for care at high-volume centers (adjusted odds ratio, 0.91, CI, 0.83-0.99). Referral for care was associated with a longer duration of waiting time from diagnosis to surgery (β + 28 days, CI, 28-29) and greater travel distance (β + 12 miles, CI, 11-13). Additionally, referral was linked with greater likelihood of receiving a minimally invasive operation and reduced odds of perioperative morbidity; referral to high-volume centers was associated with superior 5-year survival.

Conclusions

Black patients faced a lower likelihood of referral for surgical care, reduced access to high-volume centers when referred, and longer waiting times from diagnosis to surgery. National efforts should seek to facilitate referral and ensure equitable access to high-quality care.
基于种族的肺癌治疗差异得到了很好的描述,例如黑人患者获得筛查和早期诊断的机会较低,总生存率较低。我们试图研究以种族为基础的转介到癌症委员会认可的肺切除术医院的差异。方法:在国家癌症数据库中,我们将2010年至2022年期间诊断为IA期非小细胞肺癌并接受最终手术切除的所有18岁或以上白人或黑人患者制成表格。在独立机构诊断的患者被认为是“转诊”,而在同一中心诊断和治疗的患者被认为是“非转诊”。按累积手术量排名前四分之一的医院被认为是大手术量中心(≥30例/年)。结果123,706例患者中,33,218例(27%)转诊治疗。在风险调整后,黑人仍然与较低的转诊可能性相关(调整优势比,0.80,CI, 0.77-0.85)。此外,在被转诊的患者中,黑人种族与转诊到大容量中心的几率降低相关(调整优势比为0.91,CI为0.83-0.99)。转诊与从诊断到手术的等待时间(β + 28天,CI, 28-29)和更长的旅行距离(β + 12英里,CI, 11-13)相关。此外,转诊与接受微创手术的可能性更大,围手术期发病率降低有关;转诊到大容量中心与更高的5年生存率相关。结论:黑人患者转诊到外科治疗的可能性较低,转诊到大容量中心的机会减少,从诊断到手术的等待时间较长。国家应努力促进转诊并确保公平获得高质量护理。
{"title":"National race-based disparities in referral to Commission on Cancer centers for lung cancer resection","authors":"Sara Sakowitz MD, MPH, MBA ,&nbsp;Syed Shahyan Bakhtiyar MD, MBE ,&nbsp;Yas Sanaiha MD ,&nbsp;Konmal Ali BS ,&nbsp;Peyman Benharash MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xjon.2025.101544","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xjon.2025.101544","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Race-based disparities in lung cancer care are well described, such that Black patients face lower access to screening and early diagnosis, and inferior overall survival. We sought to examine race-based differences in referral to Commission on Cancer–accredited hospitals for pulmonary resection.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Within the National Cancer Database, we tabulated all patients aged 18 years or more of White or Black race diagnosed with stage IA non–small cell lung cancer who underwent definitive surgical resection from 2010 to 2022. Patients diagnosed at a separate institution from the operating facility were considered “referred,” and those diagnosed and treated at the same center were considered “nonreferred.” Hospitals in the top quartile by cumulative volume were considered high-volume centers (≥30 resections/year).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 123,706 patients, 33,218 (27%) were referred for care. After risk adjustment, Black race remained associated with a lower likelihood of referral (adjusted odds ratio, 0.80, CI, 0.77-0.85). Moreover, among those referred, Black race was associated with reduced odds of referral for care at high-volume centers (adjusted odds ratio, 0.91, CI, 0.83-0.99). Referral for care was associated with a longer duration of waiting time from diagnosis to surgery (β + 28 days, CI, 28-29) and greater travel distance (β + 12 miles, CI, 11-13). Additionally, referral was linked with greater likelihood of receiving a minimally invasive operation and reduced odds of perioperative morbidity; referral to high-volume centers was associated with superior 5-year survival.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Black patients faced a lower likelihood of referral for surgical care, reduced access to high-volume centers when referred, and longer waiting times from diagnosis to surgery. National efforts should seek to facilitate referral and ensure equitable access to high-quality care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74032,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS open","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 101544"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147411914","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Neonatal coarctation repair via thoracotomy with proximal arch hypoplasia up to a z score of −4.5 is safe and durable z评分为- 4.5的近端弓发育不全的开胸新生儿缩窄修复术是安全且持久的
IF 1.9 Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2025.11.006
William Hampton Gray MD , Christopher Mason Berry BS , Robert Sorabella MD , Luz A. Padilla MD, MSPH , Carlisle O'Meara CCP, FPP , Matthew G. Clark MD , Stephen Clark MD , Robert J. Dabal MD

Objective

Hypoplasia of the proximal transverse arch (PTA) can be associated with coarctation. Management is via sternotomy with arch reconstruction or thoracotomy with extended end-to-end anastomosis (T-EEEA). Our preferred approach is T-EEEA with expectations that the arch will grow. We hypothesized that T-EEEA is safe, durable, and permits aortic growth.

Methods

We retrospectively identified neonates (<1 month of age) treated from 2012 to 2023 for coarctation and PTA hypoplasia (z score <−2.5), and no other cardiac lesion that would mandate sternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass. We compared sternotomy with arch augmentation versus T-EEEA. Outcomes included morbidity, mortality, freedom from reintervention, and echocardiographic measurements at last follow-up.

Results

Of 91 neonates, 76 (83.5%) underwent T-EEEA and 15 (17%) sternotomy at an overall median age of 12 days and weight of 3.2 kg. Prematurity (19%), cardiogenic shock (23%), and mechanical ventilation (29%) were similar between groups. Preoperative proximal arch z score was −3.9 for the entire cohort and was different between groups (T-EEEA −3.9 vs sternotomy −5.2; P = .01). Median ventilator and discharge times were shorter with T-EEEA (1 vs 4 days, P < .0001; 11 vs 22 days, P = .0015; respectively). Two hospital deaths occurred (1 per group). Morbidities included 7 recurrent nerve injuries, 1 chylothorax, and 1 stroke. Eight patients (T-EEEA 7, 9% vs sternotomy 1, 7%; P = .75) required reintervention (5 catheter, 3 surgical). All 3 surgical reinterventions occurred in patients who underwent T-EEEA with preoperative PTA z scores <−4.5. Freedom from reintervention at 5 years was similar between groups (T-EEEA 92% vs sternotomy 94%) and at a median follow-up of 58 months, there was adequate growth of the proximal arch with a median z score of −1.6 (T-EEEA −1.7, sternotomy −1.3, P = .13).

Conclusions

Repair of neonatal coarctation via thoracotomy with proximal arch hypoplasia up to a z score of −4.5 is safe, durable, with low rate of reintervention. Patients with a proximal arch z score <−4.5 should undergo aortic arch reconstruction via sternotomy.
目的:近端横弓发育不全可合并缩窄。治疗方法为胸骨切开术伴弓重建或开胸伴端到端延伸吻合(T-EEEA)。我们首选的方法是T-EEEA,并期望拱门会增长。我们假设T-EEEA是安全的,持久的,并允许主动脉生长。方法回顾性研究2012年至2023年间因缩窄和PTA发育不全(z评分<; - 2.5)而接受治疗的新生儿(1个月大),无其他心脏病变需要开胸和体外循环。我们比较了胸骨切开术加弓隆胸与T-EEEA。结果包括发病率、死亡率、免于再干预和最后随访时的超声心动图测量。结果91例新生儿中,76例(83.5%)行T-EEEA, 15例(17%)行胸骨切开术,总中位年龄为12天,体重为3.2 kg。早产(19%)、心源性休克(23%)和机械通气(29%)组间相似。整个队列术前近端弓z评分为- 3.9,组间差异较大(T-EEEA - 3.9 vs胸骨切开术- 5.2;P = 0.01)。T-EEEA患者中位呼吸机和排气时间较短(1天vs 4天,P = 0.0001; 11天vs 22天,P = 0.0015)。发生2例医院死亡(每组1例)。发病包括7例复发性神经损伤,1例乳糜胸,1例脑卒中。8例患者(T-EEEA 7.9% vs胸骨切开术1.7%;P = 0.75)需要再干预(5例导管,3例手术)。所有3次手术再干预均发生在术前PTA z评分为<; - 4.5的T-EEEA患者中。5年后,两组之间的再干预自由度相似(T-EEEA 92% vs胸骨切开术94%),中位随访58个月时,近端弓生长充足,中位z评分为- 1.6 (T-EEEA - 1.7,胸骨切开术- 1.3,P = 0.13)。结论开胸治疗新生儿近端弓发育不全z评分≥- 4.5安全、持久、再干预率低。近端主动脉弓z评分为<; - 4.5的患者应通过胸骨切开术进行主动脉弓重建。
{"title":"Neonatal coarctation repair via thoracotomy with proximal arch hypoplasia up to a z score of −4.5 is safe and durable","authors":"William Hampton Gray MD ,&nbsp;Christopher Mason Berry BS ,&nbsp;Robert Sorabella MD ,&nbsp;Luz A. Padilla MD, MSPH ,&nbsp;Carlisle O'Meara CCP, FPP ,&nbsp;Matthew G. Clark MD ,&nbsp;Stephen Clark MD ,&nbsp;Robert J. Dabal MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xjon.2025.11.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xjon.2025.11.006","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Hypoplasia of the proximal transverse arch (PTA) can be associated with coarctation. Management is via sternotomy with arch reconstruction or thoracotomy with extended end-to-end anastomosis (T-EEEA). Our preferred approach is T-EEEA with expectations that the arch will grow. We hypothesized that T-EEEA is safe, durable, and permits aortic growth.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively identified neonates (&lt;1 month of age) treated from 2012 to 2023 for coarctation and PTA hypoplasia (z score &lt;−2.5), and no other cardiac lesion that would mandate sternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass. We compared sternotomy with arch augmentation versus T-EEEA. Outcomes included morbidity, mortality, freedom from reintervention, and echocardiographic measurements at last follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 91 neonates, 76 (83.5%) underwent T-EEEA and 15 (17%) sternotomy at an overall median age of 12 days and weight of 3.2 kg. Prematurity (19%), cardiogenic shock (23%), and mechanical ventilation (29%) were similar between groups. Preoperative proximal arch z score was −3.9 for the entire cohort and was different between groups (T-EEEA −3.9 vs sternotomy −5.2; <em>P</em> = .01). Median ventilator and discharge times were shorter with T-EEEA (1 vs 4 days, <em>P</em> &lt; .0001; 11 vs 22 days, <em>P</em> = .0015; respectively). Two hospital deaths occurred (1 per group). Morbidities included 7 recurrent nerve injuries, 1 chylothorax, and 1 stroke. Eight patients (T-EEEA 7, 9% vs sternotomy 1, 7%; <em>P</em> = .75) required reintervention (5 catheter, 3 surgical). All 3 surgical reinterventions occurred in patients who underwent T-EEEA with preoperative PTA z scores &lt;−4.5. Freedom from reintervention at 5 years was similar between groups (T-EEEA 92% vs sternotomy 94%) and at a median follow-up of 58 months, there was adequate growth of the proximal arch with a median z score of −1.6 (T-EEEA −1.7, sternotomy −1.3, <em>P</em> = .13).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Repair of neonatal coarctation via thoracotomy with proximal arch hypoplasia up to a z score of −4.5 is safe, durable, with low rate of reintervention. Patients with a proximal arch z score &lt;−4.5 should undergo aortic arch reconstruction via sternotomy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74032,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS open","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 101516"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147412576","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
No-touch versus conventional vein harvesting in coronary bypass surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 冠状动脉搭桥手术中无接触与传统静脉采集:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
IF 1.9 Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2025.11.003
Taizo Yoshida MD , Tomonari M. Shimoda MD , Yosuke Sakurai MD , Yujiro Yokoyama MD , Shinichi Fukuhara MD , Junichi Shimamura MD , Makoto Hibino MD , Tsuyoshi Kaneko MD , Hiroo Takayama MD , Michel Pompeu Sa MD, PhD , Hisato Takagi MD, PhD , Toshiki Kuno MD, PhD

Objectives

The study evaluated whether no-touch saphenous vein harvesting (NTH) improves graft patency compared with conventional harvesting (CH) and whether this translates into clinical benefit in coronary artery bypass grafting.

Methods

A systematic literature review was performed during May 2025 to retrieve randomized controlled trials comparing NTH and CH in coronary artery bypass grafting. Primary outcomes included graft occlusion per graft and per patient, and graft failure per patient. Secondary outcomes included all-cause death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, recurrent angina, and leg wound complications. Data were extracted and pooled analyses were performed using a random-effects model.

Results

Ten randomized controlled trials with 4251 patients (NTH: 2143, CH: 2108) and 4848 grafts (NTH: 2415, CH: 2433) were included. Weighted mean follow-up was 39.0 months (range, 0.2-192 months). NTH was associated with a lower risk of graft occlusion per graft (risk ratio [RR], 0.70; 95% CI, 0.61-0.81), per patient (RR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.60-0.84), and graft failure per patient (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.64-0.87). Secondary outcomes showed no significant differences in all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% CI, 0.43-1.79), myocardial infarction (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.34-1.87), repeat revascularization (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.32-1.95), and recurrent angina (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.11-3.33), except for leg wound complications, which were significantly higher with NTH (RR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.30-2.43).

Conclusions

NTH significantly improves graft patency compared with CH but confers no midterm advantage in major clinical outcomes, with increased leg wound complications. Large-scale studies with extended follow-up are needed to define its clinical influence.
目的评价非接触式隐静脉采收(NTH)与常规采收(CH)相比是否能改善移植物的通畅性,以及这是否转化为冠状动脉旁路移植术的临床益处。方法于2025年5月进行系统的文献综述,检索比较NTH和CH在冠状动脉搭桥术中的随机对照试验。主要结局包括每个移植物和每个患者的移植物闭塞,每个患者的移植物失败。次要结局包括全因死亡、心肌梗死、重复血运重建术、复发性心绞痛和腿部伤口并发症。提取数据并采用随机效应模型进行合并分析。结果纳入随机对照试验4251例(NTH: 2143例,CH: 2108例)和4848例(NTH: 2415例,CH: 2433例)。加权平均随访39.0个月(范围0.2 ~ 192个月)。NTH与每例患者(风险比[RR], 0.70; 95% CI, 0.61-0.81)、每例患者(RR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.60-0.84)和每例患者移植失败(RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.64-0.87)的较低风险相关。次要结局在全因死亡(危险比[HR], 0.87; 95% CI, 0.43-1.79)、心肌梗死(危险比[HR], 0.79; 95% CI, 0.34-1.87)、重复血运重成术(危险比[HR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.32-1.95)和复发性心绞痛(危险比[HR], 0.59; 95% CI, 0.11-3.33)方面无显著差异,但腿部伤口并发症明显高于NTH(危险比,1.78;95% CI, 1.30-2.43)。结论与CH相比,snth明显改善了移植物的通畅性,但在主要临床结果方面没有中期优势,但腿部伤口并发症增加。需要长期随访的大规模研究来确定其临床影响。
{"title":"No-touch versus conventional vein harvesting in coronary bypass surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","authors":"Taizo Yoshida MD ,&nbsp;Tomonari M. Shimoda MD ,&nbsp;Yosuke Sakurai MD ,&nbsp;Yujiro Yokoyama MD ,&nbsp;Shinichi Fukuhara MD ,&nbsp;Junichi Shimamura MD ,&nbsp;Makoto Hibino MD ,&nbsp;Tsuyoshi Kaneko MD ,&nbsp;Hiroo Takayama MD ,&nbsp;Michel Pompeu Sa MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Hisato Takagi MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Toshiki Kuno MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.xjon.2025.11.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xjon.2025.11.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The study evaluated whether no-touch saphenous vein harvesting (NTH) improves graft patency compared with conventional harvesting (CH) and whether this translates into clinical benefit in coronary artery bypass grafting.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic literature review was performed during May 2025 to retrieve randomized controlled trials comparing NTH and CH in coronary artery bypass grafting. Primary outcomes included graft occlusion per graft and per patient, and graft failure per patient. Secondary outcomes included all-cause death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, recurrent angina, and leg wound complications. Data were extracted and pooled analyses were performed using a random-effects model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ten randomized controlled trials with 4251 patients (NTH: 2143, CH: 2108) and 4848 grafts (NTH: 2415, CH: 2433) were included. Weighted mean follow-up was 39.0 months (range, 0.2-192 months). NTH was associated with a lower risk of graft occlusion per graft (risk ratio [RR], 0.70; 95% CI, 0.61-0.81), per patient (RR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.60-0.84), and graft failure per patient (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.64-0.87). Secondary outcomes showed no significant differences in all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% CI, 0.43-1.79), myocardial infarction (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.34-1.87), repeat revascularization (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.32-1.95), and recurrent angina (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.11-3.33), except for leg wound complications, which were significantly higher with NTH (RR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.30-2.43).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>NTH significantly improves graft patency compared with CH but confers no midterm advantage in major clinical outcomes, with increased leg wound complications. Large-scale studies with extended follow-up are needed to define its clinical influence.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74032,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS open","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 101509"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147412662","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Subclavian or axillary artery cannulation for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A systematic review 锁骨下或腋窝动脉插管用于体外膜氧合:系统回顾
IF 1.9 Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2025.101562
Jan Coveliers MD , Paolo Meani MD, PhD , Mariusz Kowalewski MD, PhD , Eliza Huizinga , Karthik Gutta , Giulia Piccirillo MD , Emanuele Gasparotti MEng, PhD , Emanuele Vignali MSc , Marilena Mazzoli MSc , Wouter Huberts MEng, PhD , Hamed Moradi MEng, PhD , Michele Di Mauro MD, PhD , Robert J. Holtackers MSc, PhD , Monique de Jong , Sandro Gelsomino MD, PhD , Domenico Paparella MD , Simona Celi MEng, PhD , Dorela Haxhiademi MD , Erik Körver BSc , Arne Doddema MSc , Roberto Lorusso MD, PhD

Background

Subclavian or axillary artery cannulation for venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) provides a valuable alternative to femoral access; however, a comprehensive overview of such an approach in this setting is lacking. This review examined types of access, clinical complications, and outcomes of subclavian/axillary cannulation, emphasizing the pros and cons of this VA-ECMO approach as well as areas for further investigation.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for articles published between January 2000 and December 2024. Studies were included that (1) reported on axillary or subclavian artery cannulation in VA-ECMO, (2) involved adult patients, and (3) provided in-hospital outcomes. Exclusion criteria were case reports with fewer than 5 patients and non-English language articles. Data on patient demographics, indications, cannulation techniques, complications, and in-hospital survival were collected.

Results

Seventeen studies with a total of 2030 patients were selected and analyzed. Subclavian or axillary cannulation was predominantly right-sided (99%) and involved graft interposition in 81% of cases. Indications for VA-ECMO with this arterial access included acute myocardial infarction shock (11%-42%), acute decompensation with chronic heart failure (4.9%-52%), postcardiotomy shock (7%-75.2%), acute myocarditis (4%- 7.7%) and refractory respiratory distress (5%-50%). Complications included limb ischemia (1.2%-9.6%), stroke (5.2%-18.8%) and bleeding events (4%-37.5%, often at the graft site). Left ventricular (LV) unloading strategies were used in 5.2% to 15.0% of cases but were not documented in almost 60% of the studies. In-hospital and 1-year survival rates ranged from 82.7% to 55% and from 50.6% to 25.7%, respectively.

Conclusions

VA-ECMO with axillary or subclavian artery access can be a safe and effective configuration, particularly for patients with contraindications or need of change of femoral cannulation. However, conflicting data on stroke risk, hemodynamic effects on LV ejection, the need for LV unloading (particularly with the right-sided approach), and both short- and long-term survival rates warrant further investigation.
锁骨下动脉或腋窝动脉插管用于静脉动脉体外膜氧合(VA-ECMO)提供了一种有价值的替代股动脉通道;然而,在这种情况下,缺乏对这种方法的全面概述。本文综述了锁骨下/腋窝插管的通路类型、临床并发症和结果,强调了VA-ECMO入路的优缺点以及需要进一步研究的领域。方法系统检索2000年1月至2024年12月在PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science中发表的论文。研究包括:(1)报道VA-ECMO中腋窝或锁骨下动脉插管,(2)涉及成年患者,(3)提供住院结果。排除标准为少于5例患者的病例报告和非英语文章。收集了患者人口统计学、适应症、插管技术、并发症和住院生存率的数据。结果选取17项研究共2030例患者进行分析。锁骨下或腋窝插管主要位于右侧(99%),81%的病例涉及移植物插入。经此动脉通路的VA-ECMO适应症包括急性心肌梗死休克(11%-42%)、急性代偿丧失伴慢性心力衰竭(4.9%-52%)、开心术后休克(7%-75.2%)、急性心肌炎(4%- 7.7%)和难治性呼吸窘迫(5%-50%)。并发症包括肢体缺血(1.2%-9.6%)、中风(5.2%-18.8%)和出血(4%-37.5%,常发生在移植物部位)。5.2%至15.0%的病例使用左心室卸荷策略,但在近60%的研究中没有记录。住院和1年生存率分别为82.7% ~ 55%和50.6% ~ 25.7%。结论经腋窝或锁骨下动脉通路的sva - ecmo是一种安全有效的配置,尤其适用于有禁忌症或需要改变股动脉插管的患者。然而,关于卒中风险、血流动力学对左室射血的影响、左室卸荷的必要性(特别是右侧入路)以及短期和长期生存率等相互矛盾的数据值得进一步研究。
{"title":"Subclavian or axillary artery cannulation for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A systematic review","authors":"Jan Coveliers MD ,&nbsp;Paolo Meani MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Mariusz Kowalewski MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Eliza Huizinga ,&nbsp;Karthik Gutta ,&nbsp;Giulia Piccirillo MD ,&nbsp;Emanuele Gasparotti MEng, PhD ,&nbsp;Emanuele Vignali MSc ,&nbsp;Marilena Mazzoli MSc ,&nbsp;Wouter Huberts MEng, PhD ,&nbsp;Hamed Moradi MEng, PhD ,&nbsp;Michele Di Mauro MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Robert J. Holtackers MSc, PhD ,&nbsp;Monique de Jong ,&nbsp;Sandro Gelsomino MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Domenico Paparella MD ,&nbsp;Simona Celi MEng, PhD ,&nbsp;Dorela Haxhiademi MD ,&nbsp;Erik Körver BSc ,&nbsp;Arne Doddema MSc ,&nbsp;Roberto Lorusso MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.xjon.2025.101562","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xjon.2025.101562","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Subclavian or axillary artery cannulation for venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) provides a valuable alternative to femoral access; however, a comprehensive overview of such an approach in this setting is lacking. This review examined types of access, clinical complications, and outcomes of subclavian/axillary cannulation, emphasizing the pros and cons of this VA-ECMO approach as well as areas for further investigation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for articles published between January 2000 and December 2024. Studies were included that (1) reported on axillary or subclavian artery cannulation in VA-ECMO, (2) involved adult patients, and (3) provided in-hospital outcomes. Exclusion criteria were case reports with fewer than 5 patients and non-English language articles. Data on patient demographics, indications, cannulation techniques, complications, and in-hospital survival were collected.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seventeen studies with a total of 2030 patients were selected and analyzed. Subclavian or axillary cannulation was predominantly right-sided (99%) and involved graft interposition in 81% of cases. Indications for VA-ECMO with this arterial access included acute myocardial infarction shock (11%-42%), acute decompensation with chronic heart failure (4.9%-52%), postcardiotomy shock (7%-75.2%), acute myocarditis (4%- 7.7%) and refractory respiratory distress (5%-50%). Complications included limb ischemia (1.2%-9.6%), stroke (5.2%-18.8%) and bleeding events (4%-37.5%, often at the graft site). Left ventricular (LV) unloading strategies were used in 5.2% to 15.0% of cases but were not documented in almost 60% of the studies. In-hospital and 1-year survival rates ranged from 82.7% to 55% and from 50.6% to 25.7%, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>VA-ECMO with axillary or subclavian artery access can be a safe and effective configuration, particularly for patients with contraindications or need of change of femoral cannulation. However, conflicting data on stroke risk, hemodynamic effects on LV ejection, the need for LV unloading (particularly with the right-sided approach), and both short- and long-term survival rates warrant further investigation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74032,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS open","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 101562"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147411921","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reply: Hydrodissection for conduit harvesting: Catch the wave! 回复:用于管道采收的水力解剖:抓住浪潮!
IF 1.9 Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2025.101567
John F. Gallagher MD , Victor Garcia PhD , Steven Escaravage MHS, PA-C , Pamela Gallagher MD , Paul J. Gallagher MSc , Danielle Diegisser MSc , William Davalan MD, MSc Candidate , Walid Ben Ali MD, PhD , Maximilian Y. Emmert MD, PhD , Daniel Fusco MD , Louis P. Perrault MD, PhD
{"title":"Reply: Hydrodissection for conduit harvesting: Catch the wave!","authors":"John F. Gallagher MD ,&nbsp;Victor Garcia PhD ,&nbsp;Steven Escaravage MHS, PA-C ,&nbsp;Pamela Gallagher MD ,&nbsp;Paul J. Gallagher MSc ,&nbsp;Danielle Diegisser MSc ,&nbsp;William Davalan MD, MSc Candidate ,&nbsp;Walid Ben Ali MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Maximilian Y. Emmert MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Daniel Fusco MD ,&nbsp;Louis P. Perrault MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.xjon.2025.101567","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xjon.2025.101567","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74032,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS open","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 101567"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147411925","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Right anterior mini-thoracotomy for isolated aortic valve replacement: An international and multicenter study 右前路小开胸术治疗孤立主动脉瓣置换术:一项国际多中心研究
IF 1.9 Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2025.101553
Ali Fatehi Hassanabad MD, MSc, PhD , Mortaza Fatehi Hassanabad MSc , Melissa A. King MD, MSc , Madeleine P. McKenzie BSc , Alexandre Bergeron MSc , Adwaiy Manerikar MD , Anna Huskin RN, BSN , Jane Kruse BSN , Abigail S. Baldridge DrPH , Justyna Fercho MD , Mateusz Janeczek MD , Muhammad Israr-Ul-Haq MD , Mathieu Rheault-Henry MD , Abdullatif Abo Dan MD , Michael W.A. Chu MD, MSc , Muhammad R. Ahsan MBBS , Holly N. Smith MD, MBA , Andrew Maitland MD , Daniel D. Holloway MD, MSc , Wojtek Karolak MD , William D.T. Kent MD, MSc

Background

Right anterior mini thoracotomy (RAMT) is a sternum-sparing approach for aortic valve replacement (AVR). Single-center studies have found RAMT AVR to be safe; however, there is a paucity of large, multicenter, all-comer, and real-world data for this surgical strategy.

Methods

This retrospective study investigated the outcomes of isolated RAMT AVR at 6 centers in the United States, Canada, and Europe. Primary outcomes were death and disabling stroke within 30 days of surgery. Secondary outcomes included rate of conversion to sternotomy, prosthetic used, operative times, residual paravalvular leak, rate of permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation, incidence of new onset postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF), rate of blood transfusion, and intensive care unit and hospital length of stay.

Results

Seven hundred and sixteen patients underwent isolated RAMT AVR between January 2012 and December 2024 across 6 centers. Four hundred and twenty-eight were male, and the mean age of the cohort was 68.1 ± 10.7 years. Six patients (0.8%) died and 3 (0.4%) experienced a disabling stroke. Thirteen patients (1.8%) required emergent reoperation to control bleeding, while 45 (6.3%) received transfused blood products. One hundred and thirty patients (18.2%) experienced POAF. The incidence of permanent pacemaker implantation after a sutured valve replacement was 2.51% (n = 18 patients). The median intensive care unit and hospital length of stay was 1 day and 5 days, respectively.

Conclusions

The findings of this study, the largest multicenter study on RAMT AVR reported to date, suggest that this is a safe operation associated with excellent outcomes.
背景:右前路小开胸术(RAMT)是一种保留胸骨的主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)入路。单中心研究发现RAMT AVR是安全的;然而,这种手术策略缺乏大型、多中心、全方位和真实世界的数据。方法本回顾性研究调查了美国、加拿大和欧洲6个中心的孤立性RAMT AVR的结果。主要结局是手术30天内的死亡和致残性中风。次要结局包括胸骨切开术转换率、假体使用、手术次数、瓣旁残留渗漏、永久起搏器(PPM)植入率、术后新发心房颤动(POAF)发生率、输血率、重症监护病房和住院时间。结果2012年1月至2024年12月,共有6个中心的716例患者接受了孤立性RAMT AVR。男性428例,平均年龄68.1±10.7岁。6例(0.8%)死亡,3例(0.4%)发生致残性中风。13例(1.8%)患者需要紧急再手术控制出血,45例(6.3%)患者接受输血制品。130例(18.2%)出现POAF。瓣膜置换术后永久性起搏器植入的发生率为2.51% (n = 18例)。重症监护病房和住院时间的中位数分别为1天和5天。本研究是迄今为止报道的最大的RAMT AVR多中心研究,结果表明这是一种安全且预后良好的手术。
{"title":"Right anterior mini-thoracotomy for isolated aortic valve replacement: An international and multicenter study","authors":"Ali Fatehi Hassanabad MD, MSc, PhD ,&nbsp;Mortaza Fatehi Hassanabad MSc ,&nbsp;Melissa A. King MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Madeleine P. McKenzie BSc ,&nbsp;Alexandre Bergeron MSc ,&nbsp;Adwaiy Manerikar MD ,&nbsp;Anna Huskin RN, BSN ,&nbsp;Jane Kruse BSN ,&nbsp;Abigail S. Baldridge DrPH ,&nbsp;Justyna Fercho MD ,&nbsp;Mateusz Janeczek MD ,&nbsp;Muhammad Israr-Ul-Haq MD ,&nbsp;Mathieu Rheault-Henry MD ,&nbsp;Abdullatif Abo Dan MD ,&nbsp;Michael W.A. Chu MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Muhammad R. Ahsan MBBS ,&nbsp;Holly N. Smith MD, MBA ,&nbsp;Andrew Maitland MD ,&nbsp;Daniel D. Holloway MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Wojtek Karolak MD ,&nbsp;William D.T. Kent MD, MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.xjon.2025.101553","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xjon.2025.101553","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Right anterior mini thoracotomy (RAMT) is a sternum-sparing approach for aortic valve replacement (AVR). Single-center studies have found RAMT AVR to be safe; however, there is a paucity of large, multicenter, all-comer, and real-world data for this surgical strategy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study investigated the outcomes of isolated RAMT AVR at 6 centers in the United States, Canada, and Europe. Primary outcomes were death and disabling stroke within 30 days of surgery. Secondary outcomes included rate of conversion to sternotomy, prosthetic used, operative times, residual paravalvular leak, rate of permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation, incidence of new onset postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF), rate of blood transfusion, and intensive care unit and hospital length of stay.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seven hundred and sixteen patients underwent isolated RAMT AVR between January 2012 and December 2024 across 6 centers. Four hundred and twenty-eight were male, and the mean age of the cohort was 68.1 ± 10.7 years. Six patients (0.8%) died and 3 (0.4%) experienced a disabling stroke. Thirteen patients (1.8%) required emergent reoperation to control bleeding, while 45 (6.3%) received transfused blood products. One hundred and thirty patients (18.2%) experienced POAF. The incidence of permanent pacemaker implantation after a sutured valve replacement was 2.51% (n = 18 patients). The median intensive care unit and hospital length of stay was 1 day and 5 days, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The findings of this study, the largest multicenter study on RAMT AVR reported to date, suggest that this is a safe operation associated with excellent outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74032,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS open","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 101553"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147412065","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
REPLY: Failure to rescue after esophagectomy 答复:食管切除术后抢救失败
IF 1.9 Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2025.10.009
Christina S. Boutros DO, Philip A. Linden MD, Omkar Pawar MS, Boxiang Jiang MD, Jillian Sinopoli DO, Leonidas Tapias MD, Christopher W. Towe MD
{"title":"REPLY: Failure to rescue after esophagectomy","authors":"Christina S. Boutros DO,&nbsp;Philip A. Linden MD,&nbsp;Omkar Pawar MS,&nbsp;Boxiang Jiang MD,&nbsp;Jillian Sinopoli DO,&nbsp;Leonidas Tapias MD,&nbsp;Christopher W. Towe MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xjon.2025.10.009","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xjon.2025.10.009","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74032,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS open","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 101482"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147412323","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of hypoplastic left heart syndrome anatomic subtype on mortality, ventricular function, and atrioventricular valve function in the current era 当代左心发育不全综合征解剖亚型对死亡率、心室功能及房室瓣膜功能的影响
IF 1.9 Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2025.08.014
Elizabeth M. Cordoves BA , Gerardo Ramos-Lemos BS , Vincent R. LaSala MD , Halil Beqaj MD , Paul Trackey BS , Chunhui Wang MD, MPH , Andrew B. Goldstone MD, PhD , Paul A. Kurlansky MD , Stephanie Levasseur MD , Amee Shah MD , Ganga Krishnamurthy MD , Emile Bacha MD , David Kalfa MD, PhD

Objective

The aortic atresia/mitral stenosis (AA/MS) subtype in hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) has been associated with poor single-ventricle palliation outcomes. We evaluated whether HLHS anatomic subtype influences transplant and Fontan-takedown−free survival and right ventricular (RV) and tricuspid valve (TV) function in the current era.

Methods

Retrospective chart review was done for 219 consecutive neonates with HLHS who received a Norwood at our center (2006-2023). Primary outcomes were freedom from mortality/transplant/Fontan takedown post-Norwood (n = 219) and Fontan (n = 133). Moderate or greater RV dysfunction and TV failure were secondary outcomes. Log-rank and Cox regression evaluated primary outcomes; Fine-Gray model assessed secondary outcomes.

Results

Post-Norwood (n = 219), we found that AA/MS was not associated with mortality/transplant/Fontan takedown (log-rank and Cox P = .72), RV dysfunction (Fine-Gray HR, 0.79; P = .33), or TV failure (Fine-Gray hazard ratio [HR], 1.27, P = .34). On multivariable regression, RV dysfunction pre-Norwood (HR, 4.45; P = .008) and genetic syndrome (HR, 2.21; P = .031) were associated with mortality/transplant/Fontan takedown. Post-Fontan, AA/MS was not associated with Fontan failure (log-rank and Cox P = .35), RV dysfunction (Fine-Gray HR, 1; P = .99) or TV failure (Fine-Gray HR, 1.15; P = .74). Aortic stenosis was associated with RV dysfunction (Fine-Gray HR, 2.35; P = .02). On univariate regression, extracardiac anomaly was associated with Fontan failure (HR, 7.25; P = .003). On multivariable regression, TV insufficiency pre-Glenn (HR, 5.4; P = .002) and genetic syndrome (HR, 4.15; P = .036) correlated with Fontan failure.

Conclusions

No association was observed between AA/MS and reduced transplant/takedown-free survival, RV function, or TV failure. Aortic stenosis was associated with increased risk of moderate or greater RV dysfunction post-Fontan. We found that preoperative RV and TV dysfunction, genetic syndrome, and extracardiac anomalies remain risk factors.
目的左心发育不全综合征(HLHS)的主动脉闭锁/二尖瓣狭窄(AA/MS)亚型与单心室缓解效果差相关。我们评估了HLHS解剖亚型在当前时代是否影响移植和Fontan-takedown存活以及右心室(RV)和三尖瓣(TV)功能。方法对2006-2023年在我中心连续219例接受诺伍德治疗的HLHS新生儿进行回顾性分析。主要结局为norwood术后(n = 219)和Fontan术后(n = 133)无死亡/移植/Fontan切除。中度或更严重的右心室功能障碍和电视失败是次要结局。Log-rank和Cox回归评估主要结局;Fine-Gray模型评估次要结果。结果在post - norwood (n = 219)中,我们发现AA/MS与死亡率/移植/Fontan取下(log-rank和Cox P = .72)、RV功能障碍(Fine-Gray HR, 0.79; P = .33)或TV失败(Fine-Gray风险比[HR], 1.27, P = .34)无关。在多变量回归中,左心室功能障碍(HR, 4.45; P = 0.008)和遗传综合征(HR, 2.21; P = 0.031)与死亡率/移植/Fontan取下相关。Fontan后,AA/MS与Fontan失败(log-rank和Cox P = 0.35)、RV功能障碍(Fine-Gray HR, 1; P = 0.99)或TV失败(Fine-Gray HR, 1.15; P = 0.74)无关。主动脉瓣狭窄与右心室功能障碍相关(Fine-Gray HR, 2.35; P = 0.02)。单因素回归显示,心外异常与Fontan衰竭相关(HR, 7.25; P = 0.003)。在多变量回归分析中,TV功能不全(HR, 5.4; P = .002)和遗传综合征(HR, 4.15; P = .036)与Fontan衰竭相关。结论:AA/MS与移植/无摘取生存期降低、RV功能或TV衰竭无相关性。主动脉瓣狭窄与fontan术后中度或更严重的右心室功能障碍风险增加相关。我们发现术前左心室和心室功能障碍、遗传综合征和心外异常仍然是危险因素。
{"title":"Impact of hypoplastic left heart syndrome anatomic subtype on mortality, ventricular function, and atrioventricular valve function in the current era","authors":"Elizabeth M. Cordoves BA ,&nbsp;Gerardo Ramos-Lemos BS ,&nbsp;Vincent R. LaSala MD ,&nbsp;Halil Beqaj MD ,&nbsp;Paul Trackey BS ,&nbsp;Chunhui Wang MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Andrew B. Goldstone MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Paul A. Kurlansky MD ,&nbsp;Stephanie Levasseur MD ,&nbsp;Amee Shah MD ,&nbsp;Ganga Krishnamurthy MD ,&nbsp;Emile Bacha MD ,&nbsp;David Kalfa MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.xjon.2025.08.014","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xjon.2025.08.014","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aortic atresia/mitral stenosis (AA/MS) subtype in hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) has been associated with poor single-ventricle palliation outcomes. We evaluated whether HLHS anatomic subtype influences transplant and Fontan-takedown−free survival and right ventricular (RV) and tricuspid valve (TV) function in the current era.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Retrospective chart review was done for 219 consecutive neonates with HLHS who received a Norwood at our center (2006-2023). Primary outcomes were freedom from mortality/transplant/Fontan takedown post-Norwood (n = 219) and Fontan (n = 133). Moderate or greater RV dysfunction and TV failure were secondary outcomes. Log-rank and Cox regression evaluated primary outcomes; Fine-Gray model assessed secondary outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Post-Norwood (n = 219), we found that AA/MS was not associated with mortality/transplant/Fontan takedown (log-rank and Cox <em>P</em> = .72), RV dysfunction (Fine-Gray HR, 0.79; <em>P</em> = .33), or TV failure (Fine-Gray hazard ratio [HR], 1.27, <em>P</em> = .34). On multivariable regression, RV dysfunction pre-Norwood (HR, 4.45; <em>P</em> = .008) and genetic syndrome (HR, 2.21; <em>P</em> = .031) were associated with mortality/transplant/Fontan takedown. Post-Fontan, AA/MS was not associated with Fontan failure (log-rank and Cox <em>P</em> = .35), RV dysfunction (Fine-Gray HR, 1; <em>P</em> = .99) or TV failure (Fine-Gray HR, 1.15; <em>P</em> = .74). Aortic stenosis was associated with RV dysfunction (Fine-Gray HR, 2.35; <em>P</em> = .02). On univariate regression, extracardiac anomaly was associated with Fontan failure (HR, 7.25; <em>P</em> = .003). On multivariable regression, TV insufficiency pre-Glenn (HR, 5.4; <em>P</em> = .002) and genetic syndrome (HR, 4.15; <em>P</em> = .036) correlated with Fontan failure.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>No association was observed between AA/MS and reduced transplant/takedown-free survival, RV function, or TV failure. Aortic stenosis was associated with increased risk of moderate or greater RV dysfunction post-Fontan. We found that preoperative RV and TV dysfunction, genetic syndrome, and extracardiac anomalies remain risk factors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74032,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS open","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 101420"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147412640","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Commentary: Associations are not enough the explain causality: Multifactorial interactions are the key 评论:关联不足以解释因果关系,多因素的相互作用才是关键
IF 1.9 Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2025.10.008
Christian Pizarro MD
{"title":"Commentary: Associations are not enough the explain causality: Multifactorial interactions are the key","authors":"Christian Pizarro MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xjon.2025.10.008","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xjon.2025.10.008","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74032,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS open","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 101481"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147412641","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
JTCVS open
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1