Objective
Robotic-assisted mitral repair has demonstrated excellent late outcomes without increased morbidity and mortality in experienced centers. Robust analysis of postoperative quality of life in large cohorts has been limited.
Methods
Between January 1, 2020, and April 1, 2024, 563 adult patients who underwent mitral repair for degenerative mitral regurgitation at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System Global Health 10-question survey (PROMIS-10) physical and mental scores, as well as MacNew social scores were evaluated at baseline and serial follow-up at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. Quality of life (QoL) metrics were evaluated longitudinally using a nonlinear multiphase mixed-effects regression model.
Results
A total of 1493 postoperative QoL measurements were available in 563 patients (247 robotic vs 316 sternotomy). Patients who received a robotic approach were younger than those who underwent sternotomy (age 58 ± 10 years vs age 66 ± 10 years; P < .001) with fewer comorbidities and higher baseline PROMIS-10 physical (55 robotic vs 51 sternotomy; P < .001) and mental (57 vs 53; P < .001) scores. There was no significant difference in temporal outcomes between groups (physical: P = .11; mental: P = .84; social: P = .55). Each metric in both groups surpassed the population norm and returned to preoperative baseline within 6 months (graphical abstract).
Conclusions
Postoperative QoL following mitral valve repair was excellent, regardless of approach. Patients who were selected for a robotic approach demonstrated higher baseline QoL metrics than those who received a sternotomy, but this did not translate to a comparative improvement on adjusted analyses and QoL for most patients returned to baseline by 6 months. The operative approach for mitral valve repair in patients who are candidates for a minimally invasive procedure should be tailored to surgeon experience in offering a safe, durable repair.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
