Pub Date : 2025-08-19eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1177/08977151251365585
Marie-Ève McGennis, Marc-Aurèle Gagnon, Jérôme Paquet, Alexis F Turgeon, Tassia Macedo, Caroline Côté, Mwanack Kakule Matina, Michael Verret, Lynne Moore, Andréane Richard-Denis, Line Guénette, Léonie Archambault, Cécile Duval, Mélanie Bérubé
Pain is prevalent and a major source of disability after a traumatic brain injury (TBI) and a spinal cord injury (SCI). With a view of reducing the pain burden in neurotrauma, this study aimed to describe the use of pain management strategies and the adverse effects of opioids in patients with TBI and SCI. We collected data at hospital discharge (T1) and at 3 months post-injury (T2). A total of 70 patients, including 49 with TBI and 21 with SCI, with a mean age of 56 years (±21.1, ±17.9) were included. Almost a third of participants with TBI (33%) and SCI (29%) had a moderate average pain intensity at T1, and most experienced mild average pain intensity at T2. At T1, 80% of participants used opioids, whereas at T2, 26% of participants with TBI and 53% of those with SCI did. The main co-analgesic used was acetaminophen, with 78% and 17% for participants with TBI and 81% and 40% for participants with SCI at T1 and T2. The most common non-pharmacological strategy in participants with TBI was rest at T1 (45%) and T2 (32%), and comfortable positioning in participants with SCI at both timepoints (81% and 53%). The two most frequent adverse effects of opioids in both populations at T1 and T2 were drowsiness (35% vs. 43%; 10% vs. 13%) and constipation (27% vs. 38%; 7% vs. 20%). Opioids remain the most widely used pain management strategy in neurotrauma. Promoting a judicious use of opioids, combined with other strategies, could help patients with neurotrauma achieve adequate and safe pain relief.
{"title":"Pain Management Strategies and Adverse Effects of Opioids in Patients with Neurotrauma with Acute and Chronic Pain.","authors":"Marie-Ève McGennis, Marc-Aurèle Gagnon, Jérôme Paquet, Alexis F Turgeon, Tassia Macedo, Caroline Côté, Mwanack Kakule Matina, Michael Verret, Lynne Moore, Andréane Richard-Denis, Line Guénette, Léonie Archambault, Cécile Duval, Mélanie Bérubé","doi":"10.1177/08977151251365585","DOIUrl":"10.1177/08977151251365585","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pain is prevalent and a major source of disability after a traumatic brain injury (TBI) and a spinal cord injury (SCI). With a view of reducing the pain burden in neurotrauma, this study aimed to describe the use of pain management strategies and the adverse effects of opioids in patients with TBI and SCI. We collected data at hospital discharge (T1) and at 3 months post-injury (T2). A total of 70 patients, including 49 with TBI and 21 with SCI, with a mean age of 56 years (±21.1, ±17.9) were included. Almost a third of participants with TBI (33%) and SCI (29%) had a moderate average pain intensity at T1, and most experienced mild average pain intensity at T2. At T1, 80% of participants used opioids, whereas at T2, 26% of participants with TBI and 53% of those with SCI did. The main co-analgesic used was acetaminophen, with 78% and 17% for participants with TBI and 81% and 40% for participants with SCI at T1 and T2. The most common non-pharmacological strategy in participants with TBI was rest at T1 (45%) and T2 (32%), and comfortable positioning in participants with SCI at both timepoints (81% and 53%). The two most frequent adverse effects of opioids in both populations at T1 and T2 were drowsiness (35% vs. 43%; 10% vs. 13%) and constipation (27% vs. 38%; 7% vs. 20%). Opioids remain the most widely used pain management strategy in neurotrauma. Promoting a judicious use of opioids, combined with other strategies, could help patients with neurotrauma achieve adequate and safe pain relief.</p>","PeriodicalId":74300,"journal":{"name":"Neurotrauma reports","volume":"6 1","pages":"686-699"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12413256/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145016852","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-13eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1177/08977151251362109
Juliet Haarbauer-Krupa, Jason Barber, Nancy Temkin, Lindsay D Nelson, Tracey Wallace, Nathan Barnett
Research on mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and its impact on young adults is limited, despite this being an important time in their lives to work toward independence and career development. We analyzed data on 663 persons aged 17-29 years old with mTBI (i.e., TBI with Glasgow Coma Scale scores 13-15) and 170 controls who did not experience an injury from the multicenter, Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in TBI study. We assessed participants with mTBI, subdivided into those with computed tomography (CT) evidence of TBI (CT+) and those without (CT-), at 12 months post-injury with measures to examine symptom persistence, work and school status, and functional outcomes. Results indicated differences between mTBI and control participants related to return-to-work, return-to-school, and persistent symptoms. Those in the mTBI group were more likely to experience adverse symptoms and detrimental functional effects compared with controls at 12-months post-injury. However, other factors that may not have been measured could have contributed to these outcomes. Young adults are in a transition period where they are working to achieve independence and to establish careers; however, if they sustain a TBI, they, their families, and their medical providers may not understand how the injury contributes to their outcomes, and they may also have limited experience in seeking resources for care. Outcomes for mTBI could also disrupt their career and life trajectories, making this an important area for further investigation and intervention.
{"title":"Understanding How Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Impacts the Career and Independence of Young Adults.","authors":"Juliet Haarbauer-Krupa, Jason Barber, Nancy Temkin, Lindsay D Nelson, Tracey Wallace, Nathan Barnett","doi":"10.1177/08977151251362109","DOIUrl":"10.1177/08977151251362109","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research on mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and its impact on young adults is limited, despite this being an important time in their lives to work toward independence and career development. We analyzed data on 663 persons aged 17-29 years old with mTBI (i.e., TBI with Glasgow Coma Scale scores 13-15) and 170 controls who did not experience an injury from the multicenter, Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in TBI study. We assessed participants with mTBI, subdivided into those with computed tomography (CT) evidence of TBI (CT+) and those without (CT-), at 12 months post-injury with measures to examine symptom persistence, work and school status, and functional outcomes. Results indicated differences between mTBI and control participants related to return-to-work, return-to-school, and persistent symptoms. Those in the mTBI group were more likely to experience adverse symptoms and detrimental functional effects compared with controls at 12-months post-injury. However, other factors that may not have been measured could have contributed to these outcomes. Young adults are in a transition period where they are working to achieve independence and to establish careers; however, if they sustain a TBI, they, their families, and their medical providers may not understand how the injury contributes to their outcomes, and they may also have limited experience in seeking resources for care. Outcomes for mTBI could also disrupt their career and life trajectories, making this an important area for further investigation and intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":74300,"journal":{"name":"Neurotrauma reports","volume":"6 1","pages":"651-659"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12413252/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145016830","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-11eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1089/neur.2025.0007
Chuanwei Wang, Chen Yang, Runlu Zhang, Yuan Zhang, Yanzhao Wang, Liping Ning, Guoran Du, Zhaoxi Sang, Shilei Ni, Xingang Li, Jie Gong
This study aimed to explore the experience and complications of cranioplasty (CP) with polyether ether ketone (PEEK) in pediatric and adolescent patients after decompressive craniectomy (DC). A total of 62 children (aged <18 years) with cranial bone defects due to DC underwent CP with a custom-made PEEK at our department between January 2018 and April 2023. The clinical characteristics, radiological features, surgical conditions, postoperative complications, and follow-up results of these patients were analyzed retrospectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression were used to analyze data. The age of the patients ranged from 2 to 17 years. The follow-up periods ranged from 12 to 70 months. Six patients experienced subcutaneous fluid accumulation (9.7%), five experienced epidural fluid accumulation (8.1%), and two experienced scalp inflammation (3.2%), which all were cured before discharge. Seven patients experienced bone gap expansion at the interface between the cranial bone and PEEK during follow-up (11.3%). Univariate analysis showed that DC-CP time interval (<3 months) and age were two influencing factors. Multivariate analysis revealed that age was the most important factor (p < 0.005, hazard ratio = 0.250, 95% confidence interval: 0.096-0.652). No reoperation was performed. Medical follow-ups were carried out further. For pediatric patients with cranial defects after DC who receive CP with a custom-made PEEK, two variables including younger age and too short DC-CP time interval may be unfavorable factors, to make patients experience bone gap expansion at the interface between the cranial bone and the PEEK. Additional data should be collected to validate our conclusions.
{"title":"Gap Expansion Between Cranial Bone and Polyether Ether Ketone Implant in Cranioplasty of Pediatric Patients after Decompressive Craniectomy at Follow-up.","authors":"Chuanwei Wang, Chen Yang, Runlu Zhang, Yuan Zhang, Yanzhao Wang, Liping Ning, Guoran Du, Zhaoxi Sang, Shilei Ni, Xingang Li, Jie Gong","doi":"10.1089/neur.2025.0007","DOIUrl":"10.1089/neur.2025.0007","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to explore the experience and complications of cranioplasty (CP) with polyether ether ketone (PEEK) in pediatric and adolescent patients after decompressive craniectomy (DC). A total of 62 children (aged <18 years) with cranial bone defects due to DC underwent CP with a custom-made PEEK at our department between January 2018 and April 2023. The clinical characteristics, radiological features, surgical conditions, postoperative complications, and follow-up results of these patients were analyzed retrospectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression were used to analyze data. The age of the patients ranged from 2 to 17 years. The follow-up periods ranged from 12 to 70 months. Six patients experienced subcutaneous fluid accumulation (9.7%), five experienced epidural fluid accumulation (8.1%), and two experienced scalp inflammation (3.2%), which all were cured before discharge. Seven patients experienced bone gap expansion at the interface between the cranial bone and PEEK during follow-up (11.3%). Univariate analysis showed that DC-CP time interval (<3 months) and age were two influencing factors. Multivariate analysis revealed that age was the most important factor (<i>p</i> < 0.005, hazard ratio = 0.250, 95% confidence interval: 0.096-0.652). No reoperation was performed. Medical follow-ups were carried out further. For pediatric patients with cranial defects after DC who receive CP with a custom-made PEEK, two variables including younger age and too short DC-CP time interval may be unfavorable factors, to make patients experience bone gap expansion at the interface between the cranial bone and the PEEK. Additional data should be collected to validate our conclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":74300,"journal":{"name":"Neurotrauma reports","volume":"6 1","pages":"660-668"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12413251/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145016897","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-05eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1177/08977151251362101
Grace O Recht, Giselle Lima-Cooper, Claire V Buddenbaum, Sage H Sweeney, Zachary S Bellini, Sharlene D Newman, Dibyadyuti Datta, Keisuke Kawata
Repetitive head impacts from contact sports are associated with an increased risk of neurodegenerative conditions. While studies have examined acute and chronic outcomes in young and deceased athletes, research on middle-aged former athletes remains limited. We employed multiplex biomarker approaches to examine whether brain injury and systemic inflammatory blood biomarkers are reflective of ≥10 years of participation in contact sports in retired, middle-aged amateur athletes. This cross-sectional study included a cohort of 41 former contact athletes (32 male, 9 female) and 22 age- and sex-matched noncontact athletes (14 male, 8 female). Blood biomarkers of brain injury, including glial fibrillary acidic protein, ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), tau, and neurofilament light (NfL), alongside 18 systemic inflammatory markers, were examined via linear regression models with age and concussion history as covariates. Our analyses revealed no significant differences in brain injury blood biomarkers between groups. However, increasing age was associated with increased NfL levels in contact athletes, while greater concussion history correlated with elevated UCH-L1 and tau in contact athletes only. Contact athletes exhibited significantly increased levels of systemic inflammatory markers, including IL-8, CCL-2, CCL-3, IL-2, VCAM-1, and S100B. While brain injury blood biomarkers did not differ between groups, the association between age, concussion history, and increased NfL, UCH-L1, and tau levels in the contact group suggests potential long-term neural consequences of repetitive head impacts. Elevated systemic inflammatory markers potentially highlight a chronic inflammatory response in former contact athletes, underscoring the need for continued monitoring and interventions to mitigate neurodegenerative risk.
{"title":"Effects of Lifetime Exposure to Sports-Related Head Impacts on Brain Injury and Inflammatory Blood Biomarkers Among Former Middle-Aged Athletes.","authors":"Grace O Recht, Giselle Lima-Cooper, Claire V Buddenbaum, Sage H Sweeney, Zachary S Bellini, Sharlene D Newman, Dibyadyuti Datta, Keisuke Kawata","doi":"10.1177/08977151251362101","DOIUrl":"10.1177/08977151251362101","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Repetitive head impacts from contact sports are associated with an increased risk of neurodegenerative conditions. While studies have examined acute and chronic outcomes in young and deceased athletes, research on middle-aged former athletes remains limited. We employed multiplex biomarker approaches to examine whether brain injury and systemic inflammatory blood biomarkers are reflective of ≥10 years of participation in contact sports in retired, middle-aged amateur athletes. This cross-sectional study included a cohort of 41 former contact athletes (32 male, 9 female) and 22 age- and sex-matched noncontact athletes (14 male, 8 female). Blood biomarkers of brain injury, including glial fibrillary acidic protein, ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), tau, and neurofilament light (NfL), alongside 18 systemic inflammatory markers, were examined via linear regression models with age and concussion history as covariates. Our analyses revealed no significant differences in brain injury blood biomarkers between groups. However, increasing age was associated with increased NfL levels in contact athletes, while greater concussion history correlated with elevated UCH-L1 and tau in contact athletes only. Contact athletes exhibited significantly increased levels of systemic inflammatory markers, including IL-8, CCL-2, CCL-3, IL-2, VCAM-1, and S100B. While brain injury blood biomarkers did not differ between groups, the association between age, concussion history, and increased NfL, UCH-L1, and tau levels in the contact group suggests potential long-term neural consequences of repetitive head impacts. Elevated systemic inflammatory markers potentially highlight a chronic inflammatory response in former contact athletes, underscoring the need for continued monitoring and interventions to mitigate neurodegenerative risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":74300,"journal":{"name":"Neurotrauma reports","volume":"6 1","pages":"638-650"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12413257/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145016867","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-05eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1177/08977151251362180
Amelia J Hicks, Enna Selmanovic, Ariel Pruyser, Carley R Trentman, Joshua C Klein, Kaitlyn Wilkey, Miguel X Escalon, Natalia Bernal-Fernández, Belinda Yew, Kristen Dams-O'Connor
Recent investments in large-scale mortem tissue collection have accelerated opportunities to understand the neuropathology of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and post-traumatic neurodegeneration (PTND). Clinicopathological correlation requires ante-mortem clinical information. Post-mortem family interviews (PFIs) are an established method to capture comprehensive ante-mortem clinical information. The aim of this report was to summarize our experience of using the PFI in the Late Effects of TBI (LETBI) brain donor program to facilitate replication, expansion, and refinement of PFI methods in TBI brain donor programs. We describe the content development and structure of the LETBI PFI; interviewer training and qualifications; and considerations regarding interview duration, informant selection, and interview timing, as well as PFI inter-rater reliability. We also compare the information captured in the PFI with data abstracted from the medical records for 34 decedents in the LETBI brain donor program to illustrate the complementarity of these approaches and highlight the unique contributions of the PFI. The PFI can provide granular details about a decedent's clinical history and symptom trajectories over time, potential contributing factors to PTND including social determinants of health (e.g., race and years of education), family history of medical and psychiatric conditions, and contextual information regarding cause(s) of death. The PFI is an important component of a multi-modal autopsy that provides unique insights essential for clinical-pathological correlation investigations of chronic TBI and PTND neuropathology.
{"title":"Ante-Mortem Clinical Characterization with Post-Mortem Family Interview and Medical Record Abstraction in a Traumatic Brain Injury Brain Donor Program.","authors":"Amelia J Hicks, Enna Selmanovic, Ariel Pruyser, Carley R Trentman, Joshua C Klein, Kaitlyn Wilkey, Miguel X Escalon, Natalia Bernal-Fernández, Belinda Yew, Kristen Dams-O'Connor","doi":"10.1177/08977151251362180","DOIUrl":"10.1177/08977151251362180","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent investments in large-scale mortem tissue collection have accelerated opportunities to understand the neuropathology of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and post-traumatic neurodegeneration (PTND). Clinicopathological correlation requires ante-mortem clinical information. Post-mortem family interviews (PFIs) are an established method to capture comprehensive ante-mortem clinical information. The aim of this report was to summarize our experience of using the PFI in the Late Effects of TBI (LETBI) brain donor program to facilitate replication, expansion, and refinement of PFI methods in TBI brain donor programs. We describe the content development and structure of the LETBI PFI; interviewer training and qualifications; and considerations regarding interview duration, informant selection, and interview timing, as well as PFI inter-rater reliability. We also compare the information captured in the PFI with data abstracted from the medical records for 34 decedents in the LETBI brain donor program to illustrate the complementarity of these approaches and highlight the unique contributions of the PFI. The PFI can provide granular details about a decedent's clinical history and symptom trajectories over time, potential contributing factors to PTND including social determinants of health (e.g., race and years of education), family history of medical and psychiatric conditions, and contextual information regarding cause(s) of death. The PFI is an important component of a multi-modal autopsy that provides unique insights essential for clinical-pathological correlation investigations of chronic TBI and PTND neuropathology.</p>","PeriodicalId":74300,"journal":{"name":"Neurotrauma reports","volume":"6 1","pages":"624-637"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12413259/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145016819","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1177/08977151251361700
Bernadette A D'Alonzo, Abigail C Bretzin, Rebecca B Morse, Silvia P Canelón, Douglas J Wiebe, Andrea L C Schneider, Mary Regina Boland
The objective of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate mortality risk over five years among 6,432 female patients with a health care encounter diagnosis of TBI from hospitals and outpatient clinics within a university health system. We used TBI severity, defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Department of Defense/Veterans Affairs: mild, moderate/severe/penetrating, indeterminate severity. To determine patient death, we used death in a Penn Medicine facility and linkage to the Social Security Death Index. We used Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age at the time of TBI diagnosis, race, and encounter type to estimate associations of TBI severity with mortality risk. We evaluated interactions with encounter type and age, and stratified results by inpatient/outpatient and age group (≥65 years). Median age was 47 years (25th-75th percentiles: 29-63). Patients were most commonly self-reported White race (n = 4,126, 64.0%), and diagnosed at an outpatient encounter (n = 5,099, 79.3%; among them, 1-2% urgent/emergent). Median follow-up time was 4.22 years (IQR, 2.3-4.9 years). Overall, 2.9% (n = 185) of patients died within five years of injury. Compared with mild TBI, mortality risk over five years was 2.06 times higher (95% CI = 1.27-3.33) for moderate/severe/penetrating TBI, and 1.54 times higher (95% CI = 0.98-2.42) for indeterminate TBI. Associations were attenuated among females with inpatient encounter type and those aged 65 years or older. Our results demonstrate that TBI severity affects survival among females, and this differs by encounter type and age. Findings motivate future, more focused research into the dynamics of TBI among females.
本回顾性队列研究的目的是评估一所大学卫生系统内医院和门诊诊断为TBI的6432名女性患者5年以上的死亡风险。我们使用疾病控制中心和国防部/退伍军人事务部定义的TBI严重程度:轻度、中度/严重/穿透性、不确定严重程度。为了确定病人的死亡情况,我们使用了宾夕法尼亚大学医学中心的死亡情况,并与社会安全死亡指数相关联。我们使用Cox比例风险模型对TBI诊断时的年龄、种族和遭遇类型进行调整,以估计TBI严重程度与死亡风险的关系。我们评估了与遭遇类型和年龄的相互作用,并根据住院/门诊患者和年龄组(≥65岁)对结果进行分层。中位年龄为47岁(25 -75百分位数:29-63)。患者最常自我报告为白人(n = 4,126, 64.0%),并在门诊就诊(n = 5,099, 79.3%;其中1-2%为紧急/紧急)。中位随访时间为4.22年(IQR, 2.3-4.9年)。总体而言,2.9% (n = 185)的患者在损伤后5年内死亡。与轻度TBI相比,中度/重度/穿透性TBI的5年死亡风险高2.06倍(95% CI = 1.27-3.33),不确定TBI的5年死亡风险高1.54倍(95% CI = 0.98-2.42)。在住院偶遇型和65岁以上的女性中,相关性减弱。我们的研究结果表明,创伤性脑损伤的严重程度会影响女性的生存,这因遭遇类型和年龄而异。这些发现激发了未来对女性创伤性脑损伤动态的更集中的研究。
{"title":"Risk of Mortality Among Adult Females Diagnosed with Traumatic Brain Injury in an Academic Medical System.","authors":"Bernadette A D'Alonzo, Abigail C Bretzin, Rebecca B Morse, Silvia P Canelón, Douglas J Wiebe, Andrea L C Schneider, Mary Regina Boland","doi":"10.1177/08977151251361700","DOIUrl":"10.1177/08977151251361700","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate mortality risk over five years among 6,432 female patients with a health care encounter diagnosis of TBI from hospitals and outpatient clinics within a university health system. We used TBI severity, defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Department of Defense/Veterans Affairs: mild, moderate/severe/penetrating, indeterminate severity. To determine patient death, we used death in a Penn Medicine facility and linkage to the Social Security Death Index. We used Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age at the time of TBI diagnosis, race, and encounter type to estimate associations of TBI severity with mortality risk. We evaluated interactions with encounter type and age, and stratified results by inpatient/outpatient and age group (≥65 years). Median age was 47 years (25th-75th percentiles: 29-63). Patients were most commonly self-reported White race (<i>n</i> = 4,126, 64.0%), and diagnosed at an outpatient encounter (<i>n</i> = 5,099, 79.3%; among them, 1-2% urgent/emergent). Median follow-up time was 4.22 years (IQR, 2.3-4.9 years). Overall, 2.9% (<i>n</i> = 185) of patients died within five years of injury. Compared with mild TBI, mortality risk over five years was 2.06 times higher (95% CI = 1.27-3.33) for moderate/severe/penetrating TBI, and 1.54 times higher (95% CI = 0.98-2.42) for indeterminate TBI. Associations were attenuated among females with inpatient encounter type and those aged 65 years or older. Our results demonstrate that TBI severity affects survival among females, and this differs by encounter type and age. Findings motivate future, more focused research into the dynamics of TBI among females.</p>","PeriodicalId":74300,"journal":{"name":"Neurotrauma reports","volume":"6 1","pages":"613-623"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12419401/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145042337","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-28eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1089/neur.2024.0149
Ana Luiza Zaninotto, Fabiola Macruz, Fabricio S Feltrin, Celi S Andrade, Claudia C Leite, Vinicius Monteiro de Paula Guirado, Wellingson S Paiva, Sylvain Bouix
Most individuals with moderate-to-severe diffuse axonal injury (DAI) have impaired verbal fluency (VF) capacity. Still, the relationship between brain and VF recovery post-DAI has remained mostly unknown. The aim was to assess brain changes in 13 cortical thickness regions of interest (ROIs), fractional anisotropy (FA), and free water (FW) in three language-related tracts; the VF performance at 6 and 12 months after the DAI; and whether brain changes from 3 to 6 months predict VF performance from 6- to 12-month post-DAI. Twenty-one adults with moderate and severe DAI were analyzed. Structural and diffusion data were acquired on a 3T system 3 and 6 months after the injury. The differences in cortical thickness, FA, and FW values over time were analyzed as factors for the phonemic and semantic VF scores between the 6th and 12th months following the DAI. All analyses were corrected for multiple comparisons. Cortical thickness increased over time in 7 of the 13 ROIs in the right hemisphere and 5 of the 13 ROIs in the left hemisphere. There was an increase in FA in the right arcuate fasciculus and the inferior longitudinal fasciculus over time. An increase in phonemic VF scores was detected between 6 and 12 months post-traumatic brain injury, but not in semantic VF scores over time. Cortical thickness changes in the left posterior inferior frontal pars opercularis and left anterior superior temporal sulcus from 3 to 6 months were associated with improved phonemic VF scores over time. There was no association between diffusion magnetic resonance imaging metrics and VF scores. Our findings suggest that brain plasticity plays a significant role in the initial year following traumatic brain injury, as evidenced by increased cortical thickness and white matter integrity. Improved VF is associated with increased thickness in cortical motor regions responsible for speech performance. However, a larger sample size is needed to confirm these findings.
{"title":"Longitudinal Multimodal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reveals Improvement in Verbal Fluency Over Time in Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.","authors":"Ana Luiza Zaninotto, Fabiola Macruz, Fabricio S Feltrin, Celi S Andrade, Claudia C Leite, Vinicius Monteiro de Paula Guirado, Wellingson S Paiva, Sylvain Bouix","doi":"10.1089/neur.2024.0149","DOIUrl":"10.1089/neur.2024.0149","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most individuals with moderate-to-severe diffuse axonal injury (DAI) have impaired verbal fluency (VF) capacity. Still, the relationship between brain and VF recovery post-DAI has remained mostly unknown. The aim was to assess brain changes in 13 cortical thickness regions of interest (ROIs), fractional anisotropy (FA), and free water (FW) in three language-related tracts; the VF performance at 6 and 12 months after the DAI; and whether brain changes from 3 to 6 months predict VF performance from 6- to 12-month post-DAI. Twenty-one adults with moderate and severe DAI were analyzed. Structural and diffusion data were acquired on a 3T system 3 and 6 months after the injury. The differences in cortical thickness, FA, and FW values over time were analyzed as factors for the phonemic and semantic VF scores between the 6th and 12th months following the DAI. All analyses were corrected for multiple comparisons. Cortical thickness increased over time in 7 of the 13 ROIs in the right hemisphere and 5 of the 13 ROIs in the left hemisphere. There was an increase in FA in the right arcuate fasciculus and the inferior longitudinal fasciculus over time. An increase in phonemic VF scores was detected between 6 and 12 months post-traumatic brain injury, but not in semantic VF scores over time. Cortical thickness changes in the left posterior inferior frontal pars opercularis and left anterior superior temporal sulcus from 3 to 6 months were associated with improved phonemic VF scores over time. There was no association between diffusion magnetic resonance imaging metrics and VF scores. Our findings suggest that brain plasticity plays a significant role in the initial year following traumatic brain injury, as evidenced by increased cortical thickness and white matter integrity. Improved VF is associated with increased thickness in cortical motor regions responsible for speech performance. However, a larger sample size is needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":74300,"journal":{"name":"Neurotrauma reports","volume":"6 1","pages":"600-612"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12413258/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145016842","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-26eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1177/08977151251362176
Aria W Tarudji, Brandon Z McDonald, Evan Curtis, Connor Gee, Forrest M Kievit
Heterogeneity associated with traumatic brain injury (TBI) outcomes necessitates validated controls to differentiate pathophysiological events from experimental methodology. While craniectomies are commonly used in TBI research, inadvertent dura disruption can result in structural deficits, impacting cellular function and neurobehavioral outcomes. Thus, there is a critical need to evaluate the effect of craniectomy on neurological outcomes to develop robust experimental controls and improve pre-clinical TBI research. In this study, craniectomy mice undergoing surgical and anesthetic intervention were assessed against naïve mice for neurological deficits and pathophysiological dysfunction. T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging confirmed that no lesions or cavities were observed postcraniectomy. However, the cranial defect induced midline shifting over time, which might contribute to poorer behavioral outcomes in the novel object recognition assessment. Immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated an increase in GFAP and Iba1, indicating craniectomy elicited an inflammatory response. Indeed, neuroinflammation led to an increase in neuronal cell death, as measured by increases in α-II-spectrin breakdown products. However, craniectomy mice also presented with decreases in LC3BII and SQSTM1 expression, indicating an inhibition of autophagy. Last, craniectomy contributed to the altered expression of several tight junction proteins, including occludin and claudin-1/5, suggesting the blood-brain barrier was perturbed. Overall, the deficits associated with craniectomy preclude its use as an adequate sole control for TBI research, as craniectomy limits translational insights into the neurological changes observed in TBI. Additionally, these results support the need for the use of closed-head injury models where uninjured control mice do not show significant confounding minor injury patterns.
与创伤性脑损伤(TBI)结果相关的异质性需要经过验证的对照来区分病理生理事件和实验方法。虽然颅骨切除术通常用于TBI研究,但无意的硬脑膜破坏可能导致结构缺陷,影响细胞功能和神经行为结果。因此,有必要评估颅骨切除术对神经预后的影响,以建立健全的实验对照,并改善临床前TBI研究。在这项研究中,接受手术和麻醉干预的颅骨切除术小鼠与naïve小鼠的神经功能缺损和病理生理功能障碍进行了评估。t2加权磁共振成像证实颅骨切除术后未见病变或空腔。然而,随着时间的推移,颅骨缺陷会导致中线移位,这可能会导致新的物体识别评估中的行为结果较差。免疫组织化学分析显示GFAP和Iba1增加,表明颅骨切除术引起了炎症反应。确实,神经炎症导致神经元细胞死亡的增加,通过α- ii -谱蛋白分解产物的增加来测量。然而,颅骨切除术小鼠也表现出LC3BII和SQSTM1表达降低,表明自噬受到抑制。最后,颅骨切除术导致一些紧密连接蛋白的表达改变,包括occludin和claudin-1/5,表明血脑屏障受到干扰。总的来说,由于颅切除术限制了对TBI中观察到的神经系统变化的转化性见解,颅切除术相关的缺陷使其无法作为TBI研究的充分唯一对照。此外,这些结果支持使用闭合性头部损伤模型的必要性,其中未受伤的对照小鼠没有显示出明显的混淆轻微损伤模式。
{"title":"<b>Structural Defects Associated with Craniectomy Induce Neuroinflammation and Blood</b>-<b>Brain Barrier Permeability</b>.","authors":"Aria W Tarudji, Brandon Z McDonald, Evan Curtis, Connor Gee, Forrest M Kievit","doi":"10.1177/08977151251362176","DOIUrl":"10.1177/08977151251362176","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Heterogeneity associated with traumatic brain injury (TBI) outcomes necessitates validated controls to differentiate pathophysiological events from experimental methodology. While craniectomies are commonly used in TBI research, inadvertent dura disruption can result in structural deficits, impacting cellular function and neurobehavioral outcomes. Thus, there is a critical need to evaluate the effect of craniectomy on neurological outcomes to develop robust experimental controls and improve pre-clinical TBI research. In this study, craniectomy mice undergoing surgical and anesthetic intervention were assessed against naïve mice for neurological deficits and pathophysiological dysfunction. T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging confirmed that no lesions or cavities were observed postcraniectomy. However, the cranial defect induced midline shifting over time, which might contribute to poorer behavioral outcomes in the novel object recognition assessment. Immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated an increase in GFAP and Iba1, indicating craniectomy elicited an inflammatory response. Indeed, neuroinflammation led to an increase in neuronal cell death, as measured by increases in α-II-spectrin breakdown products. However, craniectomy mice also presented with decreases in LC3BII and SQSTM1 expression, indicating an inhibition of autophagy. Last, craniectomy contributed to the altered expression of several tight junction proteins, including occludin and claudin-1/5, suggesting the blood-brain barrier was perturbed. Overall, the deficits associated with craniectomy preclude its use as an adequate sole control for TBI research, as craniectomy limits translational insights into the neurological changes observed in TBI. Additionally, these results support the need for the use of closed-head injury models where uninjured control mice do not show significant confounding minor injury patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":74300,"journal":{"name":"Neurotrauma reports","volume":"6 1","pages":"586-599"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12419447/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145042321","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-22eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1177/08977151251362274
Niki A Konstantinides, Rachel Grashow, Heather DiGregorio, Elizabeth Nolan, Frank E Speizer, Aaron L Baggish, Ross D Zafonte, Marc G Weisskopf
Retrospective evaluations of repeated head injury are needed to better understand associations between head injury exposure and later-life deleterious outcomes. However, there is limited assessment of whether head injury recall assessments produce consistent measures over time, and no assessment of whether the reporting is related to current health status. The concussion signs and symptoms scale (CSS; developed for the Football Players Health Study at Harvard University) was designed to measure cumulative head injury exposure history by asking about the frequency of 10 CSS during active football play. Responses are summed with a total CSS range of 0-130. Former professional American-style football players completed the CSS at two timepoints. A subset of participants also reported on current health (subjective cognitive symptoms [Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders], depression [Patient Health Questionnaire], anxiety [Generalized Anxiety Disorder], pain [Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global], and overall health [PROMIS Global]) at each timepoint. To examine reporting consistency and recall bias, we calculated the Spearman correlation between measures assessed an average of 74.5 (standard deviation [SD] = 41.2) months apart and estimated associations between change in demographic, football-related, and current health factors and change in CSS (ΔCSS) over time using multivariable linear regression. Across the 335 participants, the mean (SD) CSS score at times 1 and 2 were 30.2 (25.5) and 29.1 (25.2), respectively, with an average change in CSS (ΔCSS) of -1.1 (SD = 19.8). There was no significant association between ΔCSS and years since play, months between timepoints, or age at time 1 (0.49 < p < 0.84). Eighty-one (24.2%) participants completed identical questions on current health factors at times 1 and 2. In separate multivariable models, there was no association between changes in pain, cognitive symptoms, health, depression, and anxiety reporting and ΔCSS (0.17 < p < 0.92). On average, the CSS score as a measure of retrospective concussion exposure did not change meaningfully over an average of 75 months, and changes in current health status were not significantly associated with ΔCSS. Results suggest that the CSS scale is stable over time and appears robust against changes in health status. The CSS should be considered for other retrospective studies of brain-injured populations to measure prior cumulative concussion history.
需要对反复头部损伤进行回顾性评估,以更好地了解头部损伤暴露与晚年有害结果之间的关系。然而,对头部损伤召回评估能否产生长期一致的衡量标准的评估有限,也没有评估报告是否与目前的健康状况有关。脑震荡体征和症状量表(CSS;为哈佛大学足球运动员健康研究开发)旨在通过询问活跃足球比赛中10个CSS的频率来测量累积的头部损伤暴露史。对响应进行求和,CSS的总范围为0-130。前职业美式足球运动员在两个时间点完成了CSS。一部分参与者还报告了每个时间点的当前健康状况(主观认知症状[神经系统疾病的生活质量]、抑郁[患者健康问卷]、焦虑[广泛性焦虑障碍]、疼痛[患者报告的结果测量信息系统(PROMIS) Global]和总体健康状况[PROMIS Global])。为了检验报告的一致性和回忆偏差,我们计算了平均间隔74.5个月(标准差[SD] = 41.2)的测量之间的Spearman相关性,并使用多变量线性回归估计了人口统计学、足球相关和当前健康因素的变化与CSS (ΔCSS)随时间变化之间的关联。在335名参与者中,第1次和第2次的平均(SD) CSS评分分别为30.2(25.5)和29.1 (25.2),CSS (ΔCSS)的平均变化为-1.1 (SD = 19.8)。ΔCSS与游戏时间、时间点之间的月数或时间1的年龄之间无显著相关性(0.49 < p < 0.84)。81名(24.2%)参与者在第1次和第2次完成了关于当前健康因素的相同问题。在单独的多变量模型中,疼痛、认知症状、健康、抑郁和焦虑报告与ΔCSS的变化之间没有关联(0.17 < p < 0.92)。平均而言,CSS评分作为回顾性脑震荡暴露的衡量标准,在平均75个月内没有显著变化,当前健康状况的变化与ΔCSS没有显著相关。结果表明,随着时间的推移,CSS量表是稳定的,并且对健康状态的变化表现出稳健。在其他脑损伤人群的回顾性研究中,应考虑使用CSS来测量先前的累积脑震荡史。
{"title":"Reliability of Concussion Signs and Symptoms Reporting Among Former Professional American-Style Football Players.","authors":"Niki A Konstantinides, Rachel Grashow, Heather DiGregorio, Elizabeth Nolan, Frank E Speizer, Aaron L Baggish, Ross D Zafonte, Marc G Weisskopf","doi":"10.1177/08977151251362274","DOIUrl":"10.1177/08977151251362274","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Retrospective evaluations of repeated head injury are needed to better understand associations between head injury exposure and later-life deleterious outcomes. However, there is limited assessment of whether head injury recall assessments produce consistent measures over time, and no assessment of whether the reporting is related to current health status. The concussion signs and symptoms scale (CSS; developed for the Football Players Health Study at Harvard University) was designed to measure cumulative head injury exposure history by asking about the frequency of 10 CSS during active football play. Responses are summed with a total CSS range of 0-130. Former professional American-style football players completed the CSS at two timepoints. A subset of participants also reported on current health (subjective cognitive symptoms [Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders], depression [Patient Health Questionnaire], anxiety [Generalized Anxiety Disorder], pain [Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global], and overall health [PROMIS Global]) at each timepoint. To examine reporting consistency and recall bias, we calculated the Spearman correlation between measures assessed an average of 74.5 (standard deviation [SD] = 41.2) months apart and estimated associations between change in demographic, football-related, and current health factors and change in CSS (ΔCSS) over time using multivariable linear regression. Across the 335 participants, the mean (SD) CSS score at times 1 and 2 were 30.2 (25.5) and 29.1 (25.2), respectively, with an average change in CSS (ΔCSS) of -1.1 (SD = 19.8). There was no significant association between ΔCSS and years since play, months between timepoints, or age at time 1 (0.49 < <i>p</i> < 0.84). Eighty-one (24.2%) participants completed identical questions on current health factors at times 1 and 2. In separate multivariable models, there was no association between changes in pain, cognitive symptoms, health, depression, and anxiety reporting and ΔCSS (0.17 < <i>p</i> < 0.92). On average, the CSS score as a measure of retrospective concussion exposure did not change meaningfully over an average of 75 months, and changes in current health status were not significantly associated with ΔCSS. Results suggest that the CSS scale is stable over time and appears robust against changes in health status. The CSS should be considered for other retrospective studies of brain-injured populations to measure prior cumulative concussion history.</p>","PeriodicalId":74300,"journal":{"name":"Neurotrauma reports","volume":"6 1","pages":"578-585"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12413250/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145016876","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) impairs a patient's capacity for informed decision-making, necessitating surrogate decision-makers to decide whether to continue life-sustaining therapies. Patient sex and social determinants of health (SDH)-for example, economic stability, education, and health care access-possibly affect such decisions. We aimed to explore interactions between sex, SDH, and redirection of care in a cohort of patients with TBI from a high-income, high-resource country. Adult patients with consecutive TBI admitted to intensive care were included. Data on demographics, TBI characteristics, advance directives, and SDH (civil status, living situation, dependence for daily activities, income, employment, religion, nationality) were extracted. The primary end-point was redirection of care, followed by in-hospital mortality. Differences were analyzed univariably, after prognostic score matching, and through random forest models to assess the importance of each factor. Seven hundred and twelve patients (26.4% female, median age 56) were included. Women were older, more often widowed, and more frequently dependent on help, while men had higher income and education levels. Redirection of care and mortality were more common in women, even after prognostic score matching, though the difference disappeared after adjusting for redirection of care. Random forest models identified employment status and dependence on support as key factors associated with redirection of care, while sex did not improve model performance. Our results underline the importance of SDH for prognostication of patients with TBI and suggest that it is not sex per se, but the associated sex differences in SDH that affect the frequency of redirection of care and ultimately in-hospital mortality.
{"title":"Redirection of Care after Traumatic Brain Injury in Intensive Care: Sex and Social Determinants of Health.","authors":"Simone Unseld, Alessandra Nadja Herzog, Federica Stretti, Tanja Krones, Caroline Hertler, Giovanna Brandi, Stefan Yu Bögli","doi":"10.1177/08977151251360617","DOIUrl":"10.1177/08977151251360617","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) impairs a patient's capacity for informed decision-making, necessitating surrogate decision-makers to decide whether to continue life-sustaining therapies. Patient sex and social determinants of health (SDH)-for example, economic stability, education, and health care access-possibly affect such decisions. We aimed to explore interactions between sex, SDH, and redirection of care in a cohort of patients with TBI from a high-income, high-resource country. Adult patients with consecutive TBI admitted to intensive care were included. Data on demographics, TBI characteristics, advance directives, and SDH (civil status, living situation, dependence for daily activities, income, employment, religion, nationality) were extracted. The primary end-point was redirection of care, followed by in-hospital mortality. Differences were analyzed univariably, after prognostic score matching, and through random forest models to assess the importance of each factor. Seven hundred and twelve patients (26.4% female, median age 56) were included. Women were older, more often widowed, and more frequently dependent on help, while men had higher income and education levels. Redirection of care and mortality were more common in women, even after prognostic score matching, though the difference disappeared after adjusting for redirection of care. Random forest models identified employment status and dependence on support as key factors associated with redirection of care, while sex did not improve model performance. Our results underline the importance of SDH for prognostication of patients with TBI and suggest that it is not sex <i>per se</i>, but the associated sex differences in SDH that affect the frequency of redirection of care and ultimately in-hospital mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":74300,"journal":{"name":"Neurotrauma reports","volume":"6 1","pages":"569-577"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12419443/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145042403","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}