Seema Mehrotra, T K Srikanth, Neha Dahiya, Pulkit Verma, Girish N Rao, Prachi Sanghvi, Ashoo Grover, Rajesh Sagar
College years represent a pivotal phase as students transition into adulthood, a period marked by heightened vulnerability to mental health challenges. Beyond the high prevalence of common mental health issues, a large treatment gap (driven by both supply-side and demand-side factors) exacerbates the overall burden. Furthermore, students in higher education frequently experience psychological distress and subthreshold symptoms that impair well-being and daily functioning. Globally, technology-based mental health solutions have emerged as an important strategy to address unmet needs, with a growing evidence base across populations. Research has increasingly focused on examining digital mental health interventions for college students. Against this backdrop, we examine the challenges within India's large higher education system-which serves approximately 43 million students-and the expanding role of technology in this sector. We explore the potential for leveraging technology-based solutions to enhance student mental health initiatives within higher education institutions, considering relevant policies and guidelines that provide an impetus to these efforts. We reflect upon challenges and opportunities for implementing digital mental health interventions in Indian higher education, and propose strategic actions at institutional and governmental levels. Key considerations include data governance, safety, transparency, positioning of digital initiatives relative to in-person care, safeguards for content quality, provision of interventions at varying intensities, and recommendations for policy, governmental support, and research to optimize the use of technology for student mental health in institutes of higher education in India.
{"title":"Technology for Mental Health: Reflections on Scope and Future Directions in Institutes of Higher Education in India.","authors":"Seema Mehrotra, T K Srikanth, Neha Dahiya, Pulkit Verma, Girish N Rao, Prachi Sanghvi, Ashoo Grover, Rajesh Sagar","doi":"10.2196/78065","DOIUrl":"10.2196/78065","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>College years represent a pivotal phase as students transition into adulthood, a period marked by heightened vulnerability to mental health challenges. Beyond the high prevalence of common mental health issues, a large treatment gap (driven by both supply-side and demand-side factors) exacerbates the overall burden. Furthermore, students in higher education frequently experience psychological distress and subthreshold symptoms that impair well-being and daily functioning. Globally, technology-based mental health solutions have emerged as an important strategy to address unmet needs, with a growing evidence base across populations. Research has increasingly focused on examining digital mental health interventions for college students. Against this backdrop, we examine the challenges within India's large higher education system-which serves approximately 43 million students-and the expanding role of technology in this sector. We explore the potential for leveraging technology-based solutions to enhance student mental health initiatives within higher education institutions, considering relevant policies and guidelines that provide an impetus to these efforts. We reflect upon challenges and opportunities for implementing digital mental health interventions in Indian higher education, and propose strategic actions at institutional and governmental levels. Key considerations include data governance, safety, transparency, positioning of digital initiatives relative to in-person care, safeguards for content quality, provision of interventions at varying intensities, and recommendations for policy, governmental support, and research to optimize the use of technology for student mental health in institutes of higher education in India.</p>","PeriodicalId":74345,"journal":{"name":"Online journal of public health informatics","volume":"17 ","pages":"e78065"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12680939/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145575086","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sean Arayasirikul, Jarett Maycott, Arianna Contestable
This research letter describes substance use disparities among online, help-seeking, sexual and gender minoritized people in San Francisco. Our findings emphasize the importance of strengthening public health practice by leveraging digital and online methods to reach communities.
{"title":"Disparities in Tobacco Use, Binge Drinking, and Injection Drug Use Among Sexual and Gender Minoritized People Recruited Online in San Francisco, California: Survey Results.","authors":"Sean Arayasirikul, Jarett Maycott, Arianna Contestable","doi":"10.2196/81982","DOIUrl":"10.2196/81982","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This research letter describes substance use disparities among online, help-seeking, sexual and gender minoritized people in San Francisco. Our findings emphasize the importance of strengthening public health practice by leveraging digital and online methods to reach communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":74345,"journal":{"name":"Online journal of public health informatics","volume":"17 ","pages":"e81982"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12670044/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145544227","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Najlaa Mohammed Al-Mana, Suhair Abdalla Abdalla, Asrar Abdulrahim Qari, Mohamed Eldigire Ahmed, Wejdan Saeed Alshehri, Lujain Salem Baabdullah
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has boosted telehealth adoption among clinical nutritionists globally. However, there is a research gap in Saudi Arabia concerning telehealth's prevalence and effectiveness in dietetics practice.
Objective: This study aims to evaluate telehealth implementation during the pandemic in Saudi Arabia.
Methods: In this cross-sectional study, a web-based online survey was used and distributed in several Saudi Arabian regions between December 2022 to May 2023. A convenient sample of 306 clinical Registered Dietitians (RDNs) in public and private healthcare facilities who met the study's inclusion criteria were included in this study.
Results: During the COVID-19 pandemic, 56% of RDNs utilized telehealth, showing significant differences in socio-demographics and telehealth knowledge at healthcare facilities (p<0.05). Notable gender disparities were observed in years of experience, with 78% of male dietitians working in public hospitals (p = 0.001, p < 0.004). The main telehealth nutrition services provided included nutrition education (21%), nutrition counseling (19%), and nutrition monitoring (17%). Telenutrition purposes primarily focused on nutrition education (21%) and weight and diet management (17.15%), and management of chronic disease (14%). Common obstacles reported by RDNs using telehealth were internet connectivity issues (46%), difficulties in coordinating with patients (22%), and patient disengagement with a lack of motivation (13%). Among RDNs using telehealth, key interventions included clinical measures on diet recall (34%), weight-related measurements (31%), lab findings (26%), and who reported using telehealth for vital signs were only (8%).
Conclusions: Our findings underscore the increasing adoption of telehealth by RDNs during the pandemic, highlighting its crucial role in nutrition services. It suggests that technology enhancements and training initiatives can improve telehealth effectiveness, highlighting the need for further research in this dynamic field.
{"title":"Utilization of Telehealth and Telenutrition Services by Registered Dietitians in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Najlaa Mohammed Al-Mana, Suhair Abdalla Abdalla, Asrar Abdulrahim Qari, Mohamed Eldigire Ahmed, Wejdan Saeed Alshehri, Lujain Salem Baabdullah","doi":"10.2196/80211","DOIUrl":"10.2196/80211","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has boosted telehealth adoption among clinical nutritionists globally. However, there is a research gap in Saudi Arabia concerning telehealth's prevalence and effectiveness in dietetics practice.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate telehealth implementation during the pandemic in Saudi Arabia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, a web-based online survey was used and distributed in several Saudi Arabian regions between December 2022 to May 2023. A convenient sample of 306 clinical Registered Dietitians (RDNs) in public and private healthcare facilities who met the study's inclusion criteria were included in this study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, 56% of RDNs utilized telehealth, showing significant differences in socio-demographics and telehealth knowledge at healthcare facilities (p<0.05). Notable gender disparities were observed in years of experience, with 78% of male dietitians working in public hospitals (p = 0.001, p < 0.004). The main telehealth nutrition services provided included nutrition education (21%), nutrition counseling (19%), and nutrition monitoring (17%). Telenutrition purposes primarily focused on nutrition education (21%) and weight and diet management (17.15%), and management of chronic disease (14%). Common obstacles reported by RDNs using telehealth were internet connectivity issues (46%), difficulties in coordinating with patients (22%), and patient disengagement with a lack of motivation (13%). Among RDNs using telehealth, key interventions included clinical measures on diet recall (34%), weight-related measurements (31%), lab findings (26%), and who reported using telehealth for vital signs were only (8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings underscore the increasing adoption of telehealth by RDNs during the pandemic, highlighting its crucial role in nutrition services. It suggests that technology enhancements and training initiatives can improve telehealth effectiveness, highlighting the need for further research in this dynamic field.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrial: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":74345,"journal":{"name":"Online journal of public health informatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145454147","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Emily J Ward, Matt Hawrilenko, Millard Brown, Adam M Chekroud
Background: Depression and anxiety affect millions worldwide; yet, many people face barriers to timely and effective mental health care, underscoring the need for scalable, high-quality interventions.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and quality of a centralized, employer-sponsored mental health program in treating depression and anxiety during a period of rapid growth in access to mental health care.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study included participants using a digital mental health benefit (Spring Health), sponsored by 589 US employers from 2021 to 2024. Participants had access to therapists, psychiatrists, and care navigators. Primary measures were clinical effectiveness (treatment duration, Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item depression scale, Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item Scale) and clinical outcomes (reliable change, recovery, and remission). Outcomes were benchmarked to meta-analytic results of evidence-based therapy.
Results: A total of 52,929 adult participants started therapy from among 6868 providers during the study period, scored positive for depression or anxiety, and had at least one mental health assessment before and during treatment. Depression symptoms decreased with each log-day in treatment, resulting in a total reduction of 6.91 (95% CI -6.84 to -6.98) points at one-week post treatment, corresponding to a large effect size (d=1.61; 95% CI 1.60-1.63), significantly greater than the meta-analytic pre-post benchmark for psychotherapy (effect size difference=0.13, z=15.6, P<.001). Anxiety symptoms also decreased, resulting in a total reduction of 6.01 points (95% CI -5.95 to -6.08), corresponding to a large effect size (d=1.82; 95% CI 1.80 to 1.84), significantly greater than the meta-analytic benchmarks (effect size difference=0.64, z=61.9, P<.001). White participants and participants of color had similar outcomes. Logistic regression showed 92.3% (95% CI 92.0% to 92.5%) of participants' symptoms (in depression or anxiety) reliably improved, and 61.7% (95% CI 61.1% to 62.4%) achieved remission by 1-week posttreatment.
Conclusions: Among a large and diverse sample, using a digital mental health benefit with a centralized system of care produces clinical outcomes in depression and anxiety significantly greater than what is typically observed through meta-analyses of psychotherapy. By using data to monitor, incentivize, and improve quality of care, the clinical outcomes outperform or equal benchmarks as a growing number of individuals across race, gender, and age access mental health care.
背景:抑郁和焦虑影响着全世界数百万人;然而,许多人在获得及时和有效的精神卫生保健方面面临障碍,这突出表明需要可扩展的高质量干预措施。目的:本研究旨在评估一个集中的、雇主资助的心理健康项目在治疗抑郁症和焦虑症方面的临床效果和质量。方法:这项回顾性队列研究包括使用数字心理健康福利(春季健康)的参与者,该福利由589名美国雇主在2021年至2024年赞助。参与者可以接触到治疗师、精神科医生和护理导航员。主要测量临床疗效(治疗持续时间、患者健康问卷9项抑郁量表、广泛性焦虑障碍7项量表)和临床结果(可靠的改变、恢复和缓解)。结果以循证治疗的荟萃分析结果为基准。结果:在研究期间,共有52,929名成年参与者从6868名提供者中开始治疗,抑郁或焦虑得分为阳性,并且在治疗前和治疗期间至少进行了一次心理健康评估。抑郁症状随治疗天数的增加而减少,治疗后一周总减少6.91点(95% CI -6.84至-6.98),对应于大效应量(d=1.61;95% CI 1.60-1.63),显著大于心理治疗的meta分析前后基准(效应值差异=0.13,z=15.6, p)。结论:在一个大而多样化的样本中,使用集中护理系统的数字心理健康益处产生的抑郁和焦虑的临床结果显著高于通过心理治疗的meta分析通常观察到的结果。通过使用数据来监测、激励和提高护理质量,随着越来越多的不同种族、性别和年龄的个人获得精神卫生保健,临床结果优于或等于基准。
{"title":"Evidence-Based Mental Health at Scale: Benchmarking Retrospective Cohort Study of a Digital Employee Benefits Program for Depression and Anxiety.","authors":"Emily J Ward, Matt Hawrilenko, Millard Brown, Adam M Chekroud","doi":"10.2196/72999","DOIUrl":"10.2196/72999","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Depression and anxiety affect millions worldwide; yet, many people face barriers to timely and effective mental health care, underscoring the need for scalable, high-quality interventions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and quality of a centralized, employer-sponsored mental health program in treating depression and anxiety during a period of rapid growth in access to mental health care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included participants using a digital mental health benefit (Spring Health), sponsored by 589 US employers from 2021 to 2024. Participants had access to therapists, psychiatrists, and care navigators. Primary measures were clinical effectiveness (treatment duration, Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item depression scale, Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item Scale) and clinical outcomes (reliable change, recovery, and remission). Outcomes were benchmarked to meta-analytic results of evidence-based therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 52,929 adult participants started therapy from among 6868 providers during the study period, scored positive for depression or anxiety, and had at least one mental health assessment before and during treatment. Depression symptoms decreased with each log-day in treatment, resulting in a total reduction of 6.91 (95% CI -6.84 to -6.98) points at one-week post treatment, corresponding to a large effect size (d=1.61; 95% CI 1.60-1.63), significantly greater than the meta-analytic pre-post benchmark for psychotherapy (effect size difference=0.13, z=15.6, P<.001). Anxiety symptoms also decreased, resulting in a total reduction of 6.01 points (95% CI -5.95 to -6.08), corresponding to a large effect size (d=1.82; 95% CI 1.80 to 1.84), significantly greater than the meta-analytic benchmarks (effect size difference=0.64, z=61.9, P<.001). White participants and participants of color had similar outcomes. Logistic regression showed 92.3% (95% CI 92.0% to 92.5%) of participants' symptoms (in depression or anxiety) reliably improved, and 61.7% (95% CI 61.1% to 62.4%) achieved remission by 1-week posttreatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among a large and diverse sample, using a digital mental health benefit with a centralized system of care produces clinical outcomes in depression and anxiety significantly greater than what is typically observed through meta-analyses of psychotherapy. By using data to monitor, incentivize, and improve quality of care, the clinical outcomes outperform or equal benchmarks as a growing number of individuals across race, gender, and age access mental health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":74345,"journal":{"name":"Online journal of public health informatics","volume":"17 ","pages":"e72999"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12612640/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145403205","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Duaa Alammari, Iman A Bindayel, Noura Althukair, Noura AlRomi, Khalid Aldubayan, Najla Khateeb, Ahmed Alabdrabalnabi, Banan Banamah
{"title":"Correction: Accuracy of Nutrition-Related Awareness Messages on Twitter (Rebranded as X) by the Nutrition Awareness Providers in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Validity Content Analysis.","authors":"Duaa Alammari, Iman A Bindayel, Noura Althukair, Noura AlRomi, Khalid Aldubayan, Najla Khateeb, Ahmed Alabdrabalnabi, Banan Banamah","doi":"10.2196/85577","DOIUrl":"10.2196/85577","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74345,"journal":{"name":"Online journal of public health informatics","volume":"17 ","pages":"e85577"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12548823/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145357212","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Eren Watkins, Andrea N Cimino, Curtis Culbertson, Juliana Raymaker, Jennifer R Amico
Background: Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is the most common cause of vaginal discharge in people of childbearing age in the United States. More information about what patients do and do not like about the most common BV products and the extent to which they reduce BV symptoms is important for understanding patients' health and the current treatment landscape for BV.
Objective: Using data from online drug review forums, this study's objectives were to (1) quantitatively characterize the patient voice via sentiments (positive to negative) and emotions about the three most common Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved treatments for BV-oral metronidazole (OM), vaginal metronidazole (VM), vaginal clindamycin (VC)-and (2) qualitatively summarize themes characterizing the patient-perceived impact of BV and BV products.
Methods: Data for this mixed methods descriptive study came from 1645 users' reviews of BV products posted on WebMD.com and Drugs.com. Reviewer attributes, reviewer-submitted star ratings, and sentiment analysis (SA) using word-emotion association were analyzed with descriptive statistics and bivariate associations. A traditional qualitative analysis using qualitative description was also performed.
Results: Most reviewers were female (n=629, 99.4%), between the ages of 18 and 44 years, and reported using BV products for less than 1 month, though qualitative results suggested most reported recurrent BV infections. Quantitative results revealed reviewers' preference for vaginal products. The mean star ratings for VC were significantly higher when compared to OM and VM. VC reviews had the highest proportion of positive emotion words compared to OM and VM. Qualitative results for VC supported the quantitative findings: favorable themes related to perceptions of value, effectiveness in alleviating symptoms, and minimal side effects. Additionally, despite some concerns related to the cost of VC, reviewers said they would use the medication again. Other qualitative findings supported BV medical education campaigns for patients and providers on BV treatment.
Conclusions: Overall, people want a BV treatment that is easy to use, quickly alleviates symptoms, and has minimal side effects. Patients use product reviews to inform their decision-making about BV treatment, ask and seek answers to health-related questions, and share their experiences, presenting a unique opportunity for comprehensive patient education through clinical encounters or public health outreach efforts.
{"title":"Understanding Patient Perceptions of Bacterial Vaginosis Treatments: Mixed Methods Sentiment Analysis Study of Online Drug Review Forums.","authors":"Eren Watkins, Andrea N Cimino, Curtis Culbertson, Juliana Raymaker, Jennifer R Amico","doi":"10.2196/71720","DOIUrl":"10.2196/71720","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is the most common cause of vaginal discharge in people of childbearing age in the United States. More information about what patients do and do not like about the most common BV products and the extent to which they reduce BV symptoms is important for understanding patients' health and the current treatment landscape for BV.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Using data from online drug review forums, this study's objectives were to (1) quantitatively characterize the patient voice via sentiments (positive to negative) and emotions about the three most common Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved treatments for BV-oral metronidazole (OM), vaginal metronidazole (VM), vaginal clindamycin (VC)-and (2) qualitatively summarize themes characterizing the patient-perceived impact of BV and BV products.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data for this mixed methods descriptive study came from 1645 users' reviews of BV products posted on WebMD.com and Drugs.com. Reviewer attributes, reviewer-submitted star ratings, and sentiment analysis (SA) using word-emotion association were analyzed with descriptive statistics and bivariate associations. A traditional qualitative analysis using qualitative description was also performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most reviewers were female (n=629, 99.4%), between the ages of 18 and 44 years, and reported using BV products for less than 1 month, though qualitative results suggested most reported recurrent BV infections. Quantitative results revealed reviewers' preference for vaginal products. The mean star ratings for VC were significantly higher when compared to OM and VM. VC reviews had the highest proportion of positive emotion words compared to OM and VM. Qualitative results for VC supported the quantitative findings: favorable themes related to perceptions of value, effectiveness in alleviating symptoms, and minimal side effects. Additionally, despite some concerns related to the cost of VC, reviewers said they would use the medication again. Other qualitative findings supported BV medical education campaigns for patients and providers on BV treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, people want a BV treatment that is easy to use, quickly alleviates symptoms, and has minimal side effects. Patients use product reviews to inform their decision-making about BV treatment, ask and seek answers to health-related questions, and share their experiences, presenting a unique opportunity for comprehensive patient education through clinical encounters or public health outreach efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":74345,"journal":{"name":"Online journal of public health informatics","volume":"17 ","pages":"e71720"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12552819/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145276868","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Amir Khorram-Manesh, Marius Rohde Johannessen, Laurits Rauer Nielsen, Eric Carlström, Lasse Berntzen, Lene Sandberg, Jarle Løwe Sørensen
Background: Disaster medicine education increasingly emphasizes situational awareness and a proactive disaster mindset as crucial competencies for effective response. Situational awareness involves comprehending the disaster environment to make informed decisions under pressure, while a disaster mindset encompasses psychological resilience and effective functioning amid chaos. Integrating technologies into simulation training allows experiential learning that bridges these theoretical concepts with practical application.
Objective: This study aims to investigate the current status of teaching these concepts and the use of technology in fostering situational awareness and a disaster mindset within disaster medicine education by reviewing the existing literature.
Methods: This study used a scoping review of scientific studies (2005-2025), obtained from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, complemented by a Google Scholar search. From December 1, 2024, to the end of January 2025, 3 reviewers searched, compiled, reviewed, and selected eligible studies in English, discussing the use of technology in fostering situational awareness and disaster mindset.
Results: Out of 217 initially identified records, 49 studies met the inclusion criteria after a 2-stage screening and full-text review process. Of these, 42 were peer-reviewed scientific articles and 7 were official documents. Approximately 86% (42/49) of the studies addressed situational awareness, while only 2% (1/49) explicitly focused on the concept of disaster mindset. Most of the included studies highlighted the use of immersive technologies such as virtual and augmented reality, geographic information systems, and artificial intelligence-driven tools to enhance real-time information processing and decision-making in disaster education contexts. By strategically incorporating these advanced tools into educational frameworks, the divide between theoretical knowledge and practical application can effectively be bridged, fostering essential experiential learning and developing robust psychological readiness for future challenges.
Conclusions: Simulation training enhances situational awareness and disaster mindset, bridging the gap between theory and practice through experiential learning. The findings from this review highlight current pedagogical approaches and technological applications, identifying gaps and future directions for enhancing disaster medicine education.
背景:灾害医学教育越来越强调情景意识和积极的灾难心态是有效应对的关键能力。情境意识包括理解灾难环境,在压力下做出明智的决定,而灾难心态包括心理弹性和在混乱中有效运作。将技术集成到模拟训练中,使体验式学习能够将这些理论概念与实际应用联系起来。目的:本研究旨在通过回顾现有文献,探讨灾害医学教育中这些概念的教学现状,以及技术在培养情境意识和灾难心态方面的应用。方法:本研究使用了2005-2025年科学研究的范围综述,获取自PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science数据库,并辅以谷歌Scholar检索。从2024年12月1日到2025年1月底,3名审稿人用英语检索、编辑、审查并选择了符合条件的研究,讨论了技术在培养态势感知和灾难思维中的应用。结果:在217项最初确定的记录中,经过2阶段筛选和全文审查过程,49项研究符合纳入标准。其中42篇是同行评议的科学文章,7篇是官方文件。大约86%(42/49)的研究涉及情境意识,而只有2%(1/49)明确关注灾难心态的概念。大多数纳入的研究都强调了虚拟现实和增强现实、地理信息系统和人工智能驱动工具等沉浸式技术的使用,以增强灾害教育背景下的实时信息处理和决策。通过将这些先进的工具战略性地整合到教育框架中,理论知识和实际应用之间的鸿沟可以有效地弥合,促进必要的体验式学习,并为未来的挑战培养强大的心理准备。结论:模拟训练增强了态势感知和灾难思维,通过体验式学习弥合了理论与实践之间的差距。这篇综述的发现突出了当前的教学方法和技术应用,确定了加强灾害医学教育的差距和未来方向。
{"title":"Cultivating Disaster Preparedness: Scoping Review of Technology's Contribution to Situational Awareness and Disaster Mindset in Disaster Medicine.","authors":"Amir Khorram-Manesh, Marius Rohde Johannessen, Laurits Rauer Nielsen, Eric Carlström, Lasse Berntzen, Lene Sandberg, Jarle Løwe Sørensen","doi":"10.2196/75404","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2196/75404","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Disaster medicine education increasingly emphasizes situational awareness and a proactive disaster mindset as crucial competencies for effective response. Situational awareness involves comprehending the disaster environment to make informed decisions under pressure, while a disaster mindset encompasses psychological resilience and effective functioning amid chaos. Integrating technologies into simulation training allows experiential learning that bridges these theoretical concepts with practical application.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to investigate the current status of teaching these concepts and the use of technology in fostering situational awareness and a disaster mindset within disaster medicine education by reviewing the existing literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used a scoping review of scientific studies (2005-2025), obtained from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, complemented by a Google Scholar search. From December 1, 2024, to the end of January 2025, 3 reviewers searched, compiled, reviewed, and selected eligible studies in English, discussing the use of technology in fostering situational awareness and disaster mindset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 217 initially identified records, 49 studies met the inclusion criteria after a 2-stage screening and full-text review process. Of these, 42 were peer-reviewed scientific articles and 7 were official documents. Approximately 86% (42/49) of the studies addressed situational awareness, while only 2% (1/49) explicitly focused on the concept of disaster mindset. Most of the included studies highlighted the use of immersive technologies such as virtual and augmented reality, geographic information systems, and artificial intelligence-driven tools to enhance real-time information processing and decision-making in disaster education contexts. By strategically incorporating these advanced tools into educational frameworks, the divide between theoretical knowledge and practical application can effectively be bridged, fostering essential experiential learning and developing robust psychological readiness for future challenges.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Simulation training enhances situational awareness and disaster mindset, bridging the gap between theory and practice through experiential learning. The findings from this review highlight current pedagogical approaches and technological applications, identifying gaps and future directions for enhancing disaster medicine education.</p>","PeriodicalId":74345,"journal":{"name":"Online journal of public health informatics","volume":"17 ","pages":"e75404"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12513712/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145276856","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Duaa Alammari, Iman A Bindayel, Noura Althukair, Noura AlRomi, Khalid Aldubayan, Najla Khateeb, Ahmed Alabdrabalnabi, Banan Banamah
Background: With the increasing use of social media, platforms like Twitter (rebranded as X in 2023) have become popular channels for disseminating health information. In Saudi Arabia, Twitter is widely used, making it an effective tool for health awareness. However, the accuracy of nutrition-related content on social media is often questioned.
Objective: The study aims to evaluate the accuracy and evidence-based quality of nutrition-related tweets posted by reputable Saudi health and nutrition awareness providers.
Methods: A mixed methods content analysis was conducted on tweets published by 7 Saudi health organizations, examining content in Arabic and English over 12 months. Nutrition-related tweets were analyzed for accuracy, popularity, and evidence inclusion by a panel of experts in clinical nutrition, food science, and technology.
Results: A total of 531 nutrition-related tweets were included in the study. Findings indicate that 445 (84%) of the tweets were accurate, of which only 17 (4%) included cited evidence. Yet, only 13 (2%) were inaccurate. The highest number of tweets are from Saudi Food and Drug Administration (SFDA) 96 (18%), Gulf Health Council (GHC) 91 (17%), Saudi Society for Clinical Nutrition (SSCN) 89 (16%), Kayl Association for Combating Obesity 83 (16%) and National Nutrition Committee (NNC) 80 (15%) and the lowest is Ministry of Health (MOH) 31 (5%). Significant relationships were observed between tweet accuracy and the source organization (P=.009, 95% CI 0.008-0.01), content type (P=.03, 95% CI 0.03-0.03), and tweet timing (P=.04, 95% CI 0.04-0.04). Governmental sources had higher popularity and were more frequently accurate compared to nongovernmental sources.
Conclusions: Reputable Twitter accounts in Saudi Arabia generally provide accurate nutrition-related content, though evidence citation is minimal. Users are encouraged to rely on reputable accounts for health information, and further research is suggested to explore the quality of evidence in such posts.
背景:随着社交媒体的使用越来越多,像Twitter(在2023年更名为X)这样的平台已经成为传播健康信息的流行渠道。在沙特阿拉伯,Twitter被广泛使用,使其成为提高健康意识的有效工具。然而,社交媒体上与营养有关的内容的准确性经常受到质疑。目的:本研究旨在评估沙特知名健康和营养意识提供者发布的营养相关推文的准确性和循证质量。方法:对7个沙特卫生组织发布的推文进行混合方法内容分析,检查12个月内的阿拉伯语和英语内容。临床营养、食品科学和技术专家小组对营养相关推文的准确性、受欢迎程度和证据纳入进行了分析。结果:共有531条与营养相关的推文被纳入研究。调查结果表明,445条(84%)推文是准确的,其中只有17条(4%)包含引用的证据。然而,只有13个(2%)是不准确的。推特数量最多的是沙特食品和药物管理局(SFDA) 96条(18%),海湾卫生委员会(GHC) 91条(17%),沙特临床营养学会(SSCN) 89条(16%),Kayl抗肥胖协会83条(16%)和国家营养委员会(NNC) 80条(15%),最低的是卫生部(MOH) 31条(5%)。推文准确性与来源组织(P= 0.009, 95% CI 0.008-0.01)、内容类型(P= 0.03, 95% CI 0.03-0.03)和推文时间(P= 0.04, 95% CI 0.04-0.04)之间存在显著关系。与非政府来源相比,政府来源更受欢迎,也更准确。结论:沙特阿拉伯信誉良好的Twitter账户通常提供准确的营养相关内容,尽管证据引用很少。鼓励用户依靠信誉良好的帐户获取健康信息,并建议进一步研究以探索此类帖子中证据的质量。
{"title":"Accuracy of Nutrition-Related Awareness Messages on Twitter (Rebranded as X) by the Nutrition Awareness Providers in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Validity Content Analysis.","authors":"Duaa Alammari, Iman A Bindayel, Noura Althukair, Noura AlRomi, Khalid Aldubayan, Najla Khateeb, Ahmed Alabdrabalnabi, Banan Banamah","doi":"10.2196/68128","DOIUrl":"10.2196/68128","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the increasing use of social media, platforms like Twitter (rebranded as X in 2023) have become popular channels for disseminating health information. In Saudi Arabia, Twitter is widely used, making it an effective tool for health awareness. However, the accuracy of nutrition-related content on social media is often questioned.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aims to evaluate the accuracy and evidence-based quality of nutrition-related tweets posted by reputable Saudi health and nutrition awareness providers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed methods content analysis was conducted on tweets published by 7 Saudi health organizations, examining content in Arabic and English over 12 months. Nutrition-related tweets were analyzed for accuracy, popularity, and evidence inclusion by a panel of experts in clinical nutrition, food science, and technology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 531 nutrition-related tweets were included in the study. Findings indicate that 445 (84%) of the tweets were accurate, of which only 17 (4%) included cited evidence. Yet, only 13 (2%) were inaccurate. The highest number of tweets are from Saudi Food and Drug Administration (SFDA) 96 (18%), Gulf Health Council (GHC) 91 (17%), Saudi Society for Clinical Nutrition (SSCN) 89 (16%), Kayl Association for Combating Obesity 83 (16%) and National Nutrition Committee (NNC) 80 (15%) and the lowest is Ministry of Health (MOH) 31 (5%). Significant relationships were observed between tweet accuracy and the source organization (P=.009, 95% CI 0.008-0.01), content type (P=.03, 95% CI 0.03-0.03), and tweet timing (P=.04, 95% CI 0.04-0.04). Governmental sources had higher popularity and were more frequently accurate compared to nongovernmental sources.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reputable Twitter accounts in Saudi Arabia generally provide accurate nutrition-related content, though evidence citation is minimal. Users are encouraged to rely on reputable accounts for health information, and further research is suggested to explore the quality of evidence in such posts.</p>","PeriodicalId":74345,"journal":{"name":"Online journal of public health informatics","volume":"17 ","pages":"e68128"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468160/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145180862","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Brittany Rohl, Laura Carolyn Jones, Rachel Nattis, Robert Dale Claar, Xavier Velez, Joy Gabrielli, John Williamson, Eric Porges
<p><strong>Background: </strong>TikTok became an increasingly popular platform for mental health discussions during a major global stressor (COVID-19 pandemic). On TikTok, content assumed to promote user engagement is delivered in a hyperindividually curated manner through a proprietary algorithm. Mental health providers have raised concerns about TikTok's potential role in promoting inaccurate self-diagnoses, pathologizing normal behaviors, and fostering new-onset symptoms after exposure to illness-related content, such as tic-like movements linked to conversion or factitious disorders. The accuracy of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)-related content with respect to conveying symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment deserves further investigation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to characterize the accuracy of PTSD-related TikTok content.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In February 2022, a search was conducted on TikTok using the hashtag #PTSD, and the 100 most-liked videos were retrieved. Videos were excluded if they were in a non-English language, duplicated, unrelated to PTSD, lacked audio, or contained nonfunctioning links. A publicly available Python package (TikTokPy) was used to scrape available metadata (views, shares, etc). Using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials (PEMAT-AV), videos were independently coded by 2 reviewers for the overall accuracy of the video (useful, personal experience, or misleading), whether the creator self-identified as a health care professional, symptoms mentioned, and overall video understandability and actionability. A third reviewer was consulted in the rare instances of coding disagreements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 100 included videos, 29 were classified as useful, 59 were classified as personal experience (subjective experience without outright inaccuracies), and 12 were classified as misleading. The degree to which PTSD-related information was accurate was not associated with its understandability, actionability, or user engagement. Besides useful videos being longer (mean 88.7, SD 63.1 seconds) than personal experience videos (mean 42.7, SD 44.5 seconds), no group differences in video metadata were observed across the number of views, likes, shares, or comments (P>.05). While self-identified HCPs were more likely to post useful content, they also contributed to 33% (4/12) of misleading videos. Changes in cognition and mood were the most frequently reported symptoms of PTSD (38/100, 38% of videos).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings were roughly consistent with previous studies of mental health-related TikTok content accuracy, although this is variable by diagnosis. TikTok's continuously adaptive algorithmic content delivery may expose users to nonspecific and potentially misleading "click-bait" mental health information, which could influence symptom interpretation and clinical presentation. Clinicians should be aware of
{"title":"Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Content on TikTok: Cross-Sectional Analysis of Popular #PTSD Posts.","authors":"Brittany Rohl, Laura Carolyn Jones, Rachel Nattis, Robert Dale Claar, Xavier Velez, Joy Gabrielli, John Williamson, Eric Porges","doi":"10.2196/71209","DOIUrl":"10.2196/71209","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>TikTok became an increasingly popular platform for mental health discussions during a major global stressor (COVID-19 pandemic). On TikTok, content assumed to promote user engagement is delivered in a hyperindividually curated manner through a proprietary algorithm. Mental health providers have raised concerns about TikTok's potential role in promoting inaccurate self-diagnoses, pathologizing normal behaviors, and fostering new-onset symptoms after exposure to illness-related content, such as tic-like movements linked to conversion or factitious disorders. The accuracy of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)-related content with respect to conveying symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment deserves further investigation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to characterize the accuracy of PTSD-related TikTok content.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In February 2022, a search was conducted on TikTok using the hashtag #PTSD, and the 100 most-liked videos were retrieved. Videos were excluded if they were in a non-English language, duplicated, unrelated to PTSD, lacked audio, or contained nonfunctioning links. A publicly available Python package (TikTokPy) was used to scrape available metadata (views, shares, etc). Using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials (PEMAT-AV), videos were independently coded by 2 reviewers for the overall accuracy of the video (useful, personal experience, or misleading), whether the creator self-identified as a health care professional, symptoms mentioned, and overall video understandability and actionability. A third reviewer was consulted in the rare instances of coding disagreements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 100 included videos, 29 were classified as useful, 59 were classified as personal experience (subjective experience without outright inaccuracies), and 12 were classified as misleading. The degree to which PTSD-related information was accurate was not associated with its understandability, actionability, or user engagement. Besides useful videos being longer (mean 88.7, SD 63.1 seconds) than personal experience videos (mean 42.7, SD 44.5 seconds), no group differences in video metadata were observed across the number of views, likes, shares, or comments (P>.05). While self-identified HCPs were more likely to post useful content, they also contributed to 33% (4/12) of misleading videos. Changes in cognition and mood were the most frequently reported symptoms of PTSD (38/100, 38% of videos).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings were roughly consistent with previous studies of mental health-related TikTok content accuracy, although this is variable by diagnosis. TikTok's continuously adaptive algorithmic content delivery may expose users to nonspecific and potentially misleading \"click-bait\" mental health information, which could influence symptom interpretation and clinical presentation. Clinicians should be aware of ","PeriodicalId":74345,"journal":{"name":"Online journal of public health informatics","volume":"17 ","pages":"e71209"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12422738/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145034448","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Maria Daniel Loureiro, Neil Jennings, Emma Lawrance, Daniela Ferreira-Santos, Ana Luísa Neves
Unlabelled: This viewpoint highlights the critical need for proactive and strategic integration of digital health tools into heat-health action plans (HHAPs) across Europe. Drawing insights from the digital health surge during the COVID-19 pandemic and recent heat-related health impacts, we identify response gaps and suggest specific strategies to strengthen current plans. Key recommendations include leveraging mobile health communication, expanding telemedicine usage, adopting wearable health monitoring devices, and using advanced data analytics to improve responsiveness and equity. This perspective aims to guide policymakers, health authorities, and health care providers in systematically enhancing heat-health preparedness through digital health innovation.
{"title":"Cool Solutions in Hot Times: The Case for Digital Health in Heatwave Action Plans.","authors":"Maria Daniel Loureiro, Neil Jennings, Emma Lawrance, Daniela Ferreira-Santos, Ana Luísa Neves","doi":"10.2196/66361","DOIUrl":"10.2196/66361","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>This viewpoint highlights the critical need for proactive and strategic integration of digital health tools into heat-health action plans (HHAPs) across Europe. Drawing insights from the digital health surge during the COVID-19 pandemic and recent heat-related health impacts, we identify response gaps and suggest specific strategies to strengthen current plans. Key recommendations include leveraging mobile health communication, expanding telemedicine usage, adopting wearable health monitoring devices, and using advanced data analytics to improve responsiveness and equity. This perspective aims to guide policymakers, health authorities, and health care providers in systematically enhancing heat-health preparedness through digital health innovation.</p>","PeriodicalId":74345,"journal":{"name":"Online journal of public health informatics","volume":"17 ","pages":"e66361"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12415298/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145006908","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}