Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-08-07DOI: 10.1007/s00292-024-01347-0
Simone Bertz, Veronika Bahlinger, Fabienne Lange, Arndt Hartmann, Markus Eckstein
Background: Muscle-invasive and metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) represents a heterogeneous disease entity with numerous morphological, molecular, and immunological phenotypes.
Aims: This article aims to provide an overview of current histopathological, molecular, and immunological prognostic and predictive factors in muscle-invasive and metastatic UC.
Results and discussion: Muscle-invasive and metastatic UC exhibits a wide range of divergent differentiations and histological subtypes. The correct diagnosis of these morphological variants is essential, as they may determine the clinical course and may also present specific and potentially therapeutically targetable molecular alterations (e.g., HER2 alterations in micropapillary UC). The morphological subtypes largely correlate with the six molecular consensus subtypes. Furthermore, morphological and molecular subtypes are associated with immunological properties that are relevant for modern immunotherapies, such as the PD-L1 status. Numerous immunotherapy studies in the setting of curatively treatable muscle-invasive UC will be reported in 2024 and 2025, likely leading to an increasing number of PD-L1 testing indications.
{"title":"[Muscle-invasive and metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder : Current state of histopathologic, molecular, and immunologic prognostic and predictive factors].","authors":"Simone Bertz, Veronika Bahlinger, Fabienne Lange, Arndt Hartmann, Markus Eckstein","doi":"10.1007/s00292-024-01347-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00292-024-01347-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Muscle-invasive and metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) represents a heterogeneous disease entity with numerous morphological, molecular, and immunological phenotypes.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This article aims to provide an overview of current histopathological, molecular, and immunological prognostic and predictive factors in muscle-invasive and metastatic UC.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>Muscle-invasive and metastatic UC exhibits a wide range of divergent differentiations and histological subtypes. The correct diagnosis of these morphological variants is essential, as they may determine the clinical course and may also present specific and potentially therapeutically targetable molecular alterations (e.g., HER2 alterations in micropapillary UC). The morphological subtypes largely correlate with the six molecular consensus subtypes. Furthermore, morphological and molecular subtypes are associated with immunological properties that are relevant for modern immunotherapies, such as the PD-L1 status. Numerous immunotherapy studies in the setting of curatively treatable muscle-invasive UC will be reported in 2024 and 2025, likely leading to an increasing number of PD-L1 testing indications.</p>","PeriodicalId":74402,"journal":{"name":"Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"363-370"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141899120","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-10-02DOI: 10.1007/s00292-024-01360-3
Atsuko Kasajima, Günter Klöppel
Bronchopulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasms (BP-NENs) account for approximately 30% of all NENs. Although BP-NENs and NENs of the gastroenteropancreatic organs (GEP-NENs) share morphological and molecular features, they differ in terms of their terminology and classification. Bronchopulmonary neuroendocrine tumors (BP-NETs) have classically been termed as carcinoid and grouped into typical (TC) and atypical carcinoid (AC) based on the presence or absence of necrosis and mitotic count. In the most recent World Health Organization (WHO) classification for NENs of endocrine organs (WHO 2022), BP-NETs-NET G1 and G2-are introduced as synonyms of TC and AC, respectively. However, the Ki-67 index, which defines the grade of NETs in digestive organs, is only discussed in the descriptive text and not included into the criteria for classification of BP-NENs. In addition, well-differentiated NENs with high mitotic counts which correspond to NET G3 in the GEP organ system are not defined. This review discusses the role of Ki-67 for a proper classification of BP-NETs/carcinoids.
支气管肺神经内分泌肿瘤(BP-NENs)约占所有 NENs 的 30%。尽管支气管肺内分泌瘤和胃肠胰器官内分泌瘤(GEP-NENs)具有相同的形态学和分子特征,但它们在术语和分类方面却有所不同。支气管肺神经内分泌肿瘤(BP-NETs)通常被称为类癌,并根据有无坏死和有丝分裂计数分为典型类癌(TC)和非典型类癌(AC)。在世界卫生组织(WHO)最新的内分泌器官类癌分类(WHO 2022)中,BP-NET-NET G1 和 G2-被分别作为 TC 和 AC 的同义词。然而,定义消化器官NET分级的Ki-67指数仅在描述性文字中讨论,并未纳入BP-NET的分类标准。此外,与 GEP 器官系统中 NET G3 相对应的有丝分裂计数高的分化良好的 NEN 也未被定义。本综述讨论了Ki-67对BP-NET/类癌正确分类的作用。
{"title":"Diagnostic issues in neuroendocrine neoplasms of the lung.","authors":"Atsuko Kasajima, Günter Klöppel","doi":"10.1007/s00292-024-01360-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00292-024-01360-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bronchopulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasms (BP-NENs) account for approximately 30% of all NENs. Although BP-NENs and NENs of the gastroenteropancreatic organs (GEP-NENs) share morphological and molecular features, they differ in terms of their terminology and classification. Bronchopulmonary neuroendocrine tumors (BP-NETs) have classically been termed as carcinoid and grouped into typical (TC) and atypical carcinoid (AC) based on the presence or absence of necrosis and mitotic count. In the most recent World Health Organization (WHO) classification for NENs of endocrine organs (WHO 2022), BP-NETs-NET G1 and G2-are introduced as synonyms of TC and AC, respectively. However, the Ki-67 index, which defines the grade of NETs in digestive organs, is only discussed in the descriptive text and not included into the criteria for classification of BP-NENs. In addition, well-differentiated NENs with high mitotic counts which correspond to NET G3 in the GEP organ system are not defined. This review discusses the role of Ki-67 for a proper classification of BP-NETs/carcinoids.</p>","PeriodicalId":74402,"journal":{"name":"Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"51-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142362516","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-11-13DOI: 10.1007/s00292-024-01386-7
Moritz Jesinghaus
Neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) are poorly differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms that can occur ubiquitously in the mucosa-bearing organs of the gastrointestinal tract. Based on their morphology, they are classified into large cell (LCNEC) and small cell NEC (SCNEC). The most common form of mixed differentiation is the combination with an adenocarcinoma, referred to as mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC). NEC/MANEC exhibit a significantly poorer prognosis than the adenocarcinomas of their respective primary sites, which is inextricably linked to their typical histomorphology. Adenocarcinomas with aberrant expression of neuroendocrine markers do not show a worse clinical course. Molecularly, NEC/MANEC have a profile comparable to the adenocarcinomas of their site of origin and a profile divergent from neuroendocrine tumors. Analyses of gastric NEC/MANEC have shown frequent MYC amplifications, which are reflected in MYC signatures in various transcriptome analyses.The cellular origin of NEC remains a subject of controversial discussion. New insights are provided by a MYC-driven, genetically modified mouse model that led to the development of large gastric tumors. These tumors were histologically identified as LCNEC and were accompanied by both neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine precursor lesions. Using immunofluorescence, a derivation from resident neuroendocrine cells in the gastric corpus was demonstrated, suggesting that at least a portion of LCNEC may originate directly from neuroendocrine cells.
{"title":"[Neuroendocrine carcinomas of the gastrointestinal tract : Morphology, molecular pathology, cellular origin].","authors":"Moritz Jesinghaus","doi":"10.1007/s00292-024-01386-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00292-024-01386-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) are poorly differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms that can occur ubiquitously in the mucosa-bearing organs of the gastrointestinal tract. Based on their morphology, they are classified into large cell (LCNEC) and small cell NEC (SCNEC). The most common form of mixed differentiation is the combination with an adenocarcinoma, referred to as mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC). NEC/MANEC exhibit a significantly poorer prognosis than the adenocarcinomas of their respective primary sites, which is inextricably linked to their typical histomorphology. Adenocarcinomas with aberrant expression of neuroendocrine markers do not show a worse clinical course. Molecularly, NEC/MANEC have a profile comparable to the adenocarcinomas of their site of origin and a profile divergent from neuroendocrine tumors. Analyses of gastric NEC/MANEC have shown frequent MYC amplifications, which are reflected in MYC signatures in various transcriptome analyses.The cellular origin of NEC remains a subject of controversial discussion. New insights are provided by a MYC-driven, genetically modified mouse model that led to the development of large gastric tumors. These tumors were histologically identified as LCNEC and were accompanied by both neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine precursor lesions. Using immunofluorescence, a derivation from resident neuroendocrine cells in the gastric corpus was demonstrated, suggesting that at least a portion of LCNEC may originate directly from neuroendocrine cells.</p>","PeriodicalId":74402,"journal":{"name":"Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"8-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142634244","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-11-25DOI: 10.1007/s00292-024-01399-2
Abbas Agaimy
With the widespread use of diverse modern molecular testing tools, the last two decades have seen significant advances in the classification of soft tissue neoplasms. Specifically, numerous molecularly defined new entities have been introduced and many established older entities have received more insightful molecular studies that have developed their classification further. The discrepant therapeutic and prognostic implications of this evolving complexity of the nosology of neoplastic diseases make the precise subtyping of soft tissue neoplasms unavoidable. However, these rapid developments of the modern diagnostic molecular pathology did not only offer efficient solutions to many complex classification issues, but they were accompanied by similarly complex and diverse emerging problems. Most importantly, these advances have not only challenged the historical dogma of some phenotypes that were once considered specific, but they also have questioned the value of diagnostic immunohistochemistry compared to emerging modern diagnostic molecular tools. Moreover, the central question of when to test, what to test, and how to test became more confusing. This review addresses the major molecular categories in soft tissue neoplasms, their characteristics, and the criteria to be used for selecting the most appropriate molecular diagnostic tool to be used in individual cases with a special focus on the value of next generation immunohistochemistry as a substitute for molecular testing.
{"title":"[Molecular testing in mesenchymal neoplasms: What, when, and how to test? : A review with a special focus on the value of next-generation immunochemistry as a substitute for molecular testing].","authors":"Abbas Agaimy","doi":"10.1007/s00292-024-01399-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00292-024-01399-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the widespread use of diverse modern molecular testing tools, the last two decades have seen significant advances in the classification of soft tissue neoplasms. Specifically, numerous molecularly defined new entities have been introduced and many established older entities have received more insightful molecular studies that have developed their classification further. The discrepant therapeutic and prognostic implications of this evolving complexity of the nosology of neoplastic diseases make the precise subtyping of soft tissue neoplasms unavoidable. However, these rapid developments of the modern diagnostic molecular pathology did not only offer efficient solutions to many complex classification issues, but they were accompanied by similarly complex and diverse emerging problems. Most importantly, these advances have not only challenged the historical dogma of some phenotypes that were once considered specific, but they also have questioned the value of diagnostic immunohistochemistry compared to emerging modern diagnostic molecular tools. Moreover, the central question of when to test, what to test, and how to test became more confusing. This review addresses the major molecular categories in soft tissue neoplasms, their characteristics, and the criteria to be used for selecting the most appropriate molecular diagnostic tool to be used in individual cases with a special focus on the value of next generation immunohistochemistry as a substitute for molecular testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":74402,"journal":{"name":"Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"37-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142712017","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01DOI: 10.1007/s00292-024-01372-z
Eike Burandt, Ramona Erber
{"title":"[Report of the Gynaecological and Breast Pathology Working Group of the German Society of Pathology : 2024 DGP Annual Conference].","authors":"Eike Burandt, Ramona Erber","doi":"10.1007/s00292-024-01372-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00292-024-01372-z","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74402,"journal":{"name":"Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"100-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142570563","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-09-24DOI: 10.1007/s00292-024-01357-y
Thomas F E Barth, Bruno Märkl
{"title":"[Report of the German Society of Pathology Working Group on Bone, Joint, and Soft Tissue Pathology].","authors":"Thomas F E Barth, Bruno Märkl","doi":"10.1007/s00292-024-01357-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00292-024-01357-y","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74402,"journal":{"name":"Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"110-111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142309308","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-09-24DOI: 10.1007/s00292-024-01361-2
Henning Reis, Felix Bremmer
{"title":"[Report of the German Society of Pathology Working Group on Uropathology].","authors":"Henning Reis, Felix Bremmer","doi":"10.1007/s00292-024-01361-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00292-024-01361-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74402,"journal":{"name":"Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"120-122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142309309","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-05-30DOI: 10.1007/s00292-024-01335-4
K Lindemann-Docter, N T Gaisa
Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is by far the most common malignant neoplasm of the urinary bladder; however, there are both benign and malignant changes of the urothelium which morphologically resemble urothelial carcinomas or other carcinomas of the urinary bladder. Thus, these mimickers can cause problems in the histomorphological diagnosis. This article provides an overview of possible mimickers and pitfalls of bladder cancer as well as practical notes on the diagnostic procedure, partly using case studies.
{"title":"[Mimickers and diagnostic pitfalls of urinary bladder cancer].","authors":"K Lindemann-Docter, N T Gaisa","doi":"10.1007/s00292-024-01335-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00292-024-01335-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is by far the most common malignant neoplasm of the urinary bladder; however, there are both benign and malignant changes of the urothelium which morphologically resemble urothelial carcinomas or other carcinomas of the urinary bladder. Thus, these mimickers can cause problems in the histomorphological diagnosis. This article provides an overview of possible mimickers and pitfalls of bladder cancer as well as practical notes on the diagnostic procedure, partly using case studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":74402,"journal":{"name":"Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"371-380"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141180975","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-12-04DOI: 10.1007/s00292-024-01397-4
András Kiss, Maja L Nádorvári, Janina Kulka, Tamás Barbai, Erzsébet Rásó, István Kenessey, Gábor Lotz, József Tímár
Background: Mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) with microsatellite instability (MSI) is frequent in cancer, particularly in gastrointestinal and endometrial malignancies. The increased tumor mutational burden renders dMMR/MSI tumors suitable targets for immune checkpoint inhibitors-provided the regulatory genetic defect can be detected. dMMR and MSI are considered equally effective predictors of the efficacy of ICIs; however, while dMMR testing is based on detection of missing MMR proteins in immunohistochemistry (IHC), MSI polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing focuses on the consequences of dMMR at the genomic level.
Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis was carried out in a large cancer cohort (n = 1306). dMMR was tested by four IHC reactions (MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, MSH6), and MSI was assessed by pentaplex PCR (BAT-25, BAT-26, MONO-27, NR-21, NR-24) in 703 cases. In 64 cases (5%), technical failures (mostly poor preanalytical fixation) prevented dMMR/MSI testing. Tumors were colorectal (CRC; n: 978), cancer of unknown primary (n: 126), endometrial (n: 39), pancreatic (n: 36), and gastric (n: 33). dMMR was diagnosed as classical, nonclassical, or unusual, depending on IHC.
Results: The MSI-high incidence was 12.1% overall and similar in the CRC subcohort. Interestingly, the dMMR incidence was higher in the total cohort (20.3%) and similar in the CRC subcohort. The incidences of proficient MMR (pMMR) and microsatellite stability (MSS) were similar in the total cohort and in the CRC subcohort. A 19.3% discrepancy was found between MMR IHC and MSI PCR for the entire cohort, independent of tumor types. In the case of pMMR, the discrepancy rate for MSS/MSI-low was low (2.0%; entire cohort and the CRC subcohort). However, the discrepancy between dMMR and MSI-high was high within the entire cohort (60.9%) and in the CRC (58.6%) and non-CRC subcohorts (68%). This high discrepancy was not due to tumors with a low T/N ratio. Regarding dMMR phenotypes, classical dMMR had a ~ 60% correlation with MSI-high status, while non-classical dMMR had a much lower and unusual dMMR a very low (< 10%) correlation with MSI-high in the entire cohort and in the CRC subcohort. Overall, the MSI PCR sensitivity for MMR IHC status was very low.
Conclusion: dMMR and MSI-high likely result in an increased rate of structurally altered proteins, i.e., neoantigens, and the efficacy of cancer immunotherapies is thus expected to be higher. We compared MMR IHC to MSI PCR in a large cohort of cancer patients to study how PCR test results correlate to MMR IHC. Our data imply that preanalytical factors strongly influence the results of MMR IHC and MSI PCR and may question the current dogma that dMMR phenotype and genetic MSI status are equivalent predictive markers for immunotherapies.
{"title":"Overview of a comparative analysis of microsatellite instability and standard mismatch repair protein-deficiency tests in a large cancer cohort.","authors":"András Kiss, Maja L Nádorvári, Janina Kulka, Tamás Barbai, Erzsébet Rásó, István Kenessey, Gábor Lotz, József Tímár","doi":"10.1007/s00292-024-01397-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00292-024-01397-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) with microsatellite instability (MSI) is frequent in cancer, particularly in gastrointestinal and endometrial malignancies. The increased tumor mutational burden renders dMMR/MSI tumors suitable targets for immune checkpoint inhibitors-provided the regulatory genetic defect can be detected. dMMR and MSI are considered equally effective predictors of the efficacy of ICIs; however, while dMMR testing is based on detection of missing MMR proteins in immunohistochemistry (IHC), MSI polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing focuses on the consequences of dMMR at the genomic level.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was carried out in a large cancer cohort (n = 1306). dMMR was tested by four IHC reactions (MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, MSH6), and MSI was assessed by pentaplex PCR (BAT-25, BAT-26, MONO-27, NR-21, NR-24) in 703 cases. In 64 cases (5%), technical failures (mostly poor preanalytical fixation) prevented dMMR/MSI testing. Tumors were colorectal (CRC; n: 978), cancer of unknown primary (n: 126), endometrial (n: 39), pancreatic (n: 36), and gastric (n: 33). dMMR was diagnosed as classical, nonclassical, or unusual, depending on IHC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MSI-high incidence was 12.1% overall and similar in the CRC subcohort. Interestingly, the dMMR incidence was higher in the total cohort (20.3%) and similar in the CRC subcohort. The incidences of proficient MMR (pMMR) and microsatellite stability (MSS) were similar in the total cohort and in the CRC subcohort. A 19.3% discrepancy was found between MMR IHC and MSI PCR for the entire cohort, independent of tumor types. In the case of pMMR, the discrepancy rate for MSS/MSI-low was low (2.0%; entire cohort and the CRC subcohort). However, the discrepancy between dMMR and MSI-high was high within the entire cohort (60.9%) and in the CRC (58.6%) and non-CRC subcohorts (68%). This high discrepancy was not due to tumors with a low T/N ratio. Regarding dMMR phenotypes, classical dMMR had a ~ 60% correlation with MSI-high status, while non-classical dMMR had a much lower and unusual dMMR a very low (< 10%) correlation with MSI-high in the entire cohort and in the CRC subcohort. Overall, the MSI PCR sensitivity for MMR IHC status was very low.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>dMMR and MSI-high likely result in an increased rate of structurally altered proteins, i.e., neoantigens, and the efficacy of cancer immunotherapies is thus expected to be higher. We compared MMR IHC to MSI PCR in a large cohort of cancer patients to study how PCR test results correlate to MMR IHC. Our data imply that preanalytical factors strongly influence the results of MMR IHC and MSI PCR and may question the current dogma that dMMR phenotype and genetic MSI status are equivalent predictive markers for immunotherapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":74402,"journal":{"name":"Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"63-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142775286","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-11-04DOI: 10.1007/s00292-024-01377-8
S A Braun, E Bierhoff, D Metze
{"title":"[Report of the German Society for Pathology Dermatopathology Working Group].","authors":"S A Braun, E Bierhoff, D Metze","doi":"10.1007/s00292-024-01377-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00292-024-01377-8","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74402,"journal":{"name":"Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"93-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142570560","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}