Pub Date : 2024-09-25eCollection Date: 2024-09-01DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000605
Elke Smith, Jan Peters, Nils Reiter
Problem gambling is a major public health concern and is associated with profound psychological distress and economic problems. There are numerous gambling communities on the internet where users exchange information about games, gambling tactics, as well as gambling-related problems. Individuals exhibiting higher levels of problem gambling engage more in such communities. Online gambling communities may provide insights into problem-gambling behaviour. Using data scraped from a major German gambling discussion board, we fine-tuned a large language model, specifically a Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) model, to predict signs of problem-gambling from forum posts. Training data were generated by manual annotation and by taking into account diagnostic criteria and gambling-related cognitive distortions. Using cross-validation, our models achieved a precision of 0.95 and F1 score of 0.71, demonstrating that satisfactory classification performance can be achieved by generating high-quality training material through manual annotation based on diagnostic criteria. The current study confirms that a BERT-based model can be reliably used on small data sets and to detect signatures of problem gambling in online communication data. Such computational approaches may have potential for the detection of changes in problem-gambling prevalence among online users.
问题赌博是一个重大的公共健康问题,与深重的心理压力和经济问题有关。互联网上有许多赌博社区,用户在那里交流有关游戏、赌博策略以及赌博相关问题的信息。问题赌博程度较高的人参与此类社区的程度较高。网络赌博社区可以帮助人们了解问题赌博行为。我们利用从德国一个主要赌博讨论区收集的数据,微调了一个大型语言模型,特别是一个来自变换器的双向编码器表征(BERT)模型,以预测论坛帖子中的问题赌博迹象。训练数据由人工注释生成,并考虑了诊断标准和与赌博相关的认知扭曲。通过交叉验证,我们的模型达到了 0.95 的精确度和 0.71 的 F1 分数,证明了通过基于诊断标准的人工标注生成高质量的训练材料可以获得令人满意的分类性能。目前的研究证实,基于 BERT 的模型可以可靠地用于小型数据集,并检测在线交流数据中的问题赌博特征。这种计算方法可能具有检测在线用户中问题赌博流行率变化的潜力。
{"title":"Automatic detection of problem-gambling signs from online texts using large language models.","authors":"Elke Smith, Jan Peters, Nils Reiter","doi":"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000605","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000605","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Problem gambling is a major public health concern and is associated with profound psychological distress and economic problems. There are numerous gambling communities on the internet where users exchange information about games, gambling tactics, as well as gambling-related problems. Individuals exhibiting higher levels of problem gambling engage more in such communities. Online gambling communities may provide insights into problem-gambling behaviour. Using data scraped from a major German gambling discussion board, we fine-tuned a large language model, specifically a Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) model, to predict signs of problem-gambling from forum posts. Training data were generated by manual annotation and by taking into account diagnostic criteria and gambling-related cognitive distortions. Using cross-validation, our models achieved a precision of 0.95 and F1 score of 0.71, demonstrating that satisfactory classification performance can be achieved by generating high-quality training material through manual annotation based on diagnostic criteria. The current study confirms that a BERT-based model can be reliably used on small data sets and to detect signatures of problem gambling in online communication data. Such computational approaches may have potential for the detection of changes in problem-gambling prevalence among online users.</p>","PeriodicalId":74465,"journal":{"name":"PLOS digital health","volume":"3 9","pages":"e0000605"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11423982/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142333977","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-23eCollection Date: 2024-09-01DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000299
Cynthia Lokker, Wael Abdelkader, Elham Bagheri, Rick Parrish, Chris Cotoi, Tamara Navarro, Federico Germini, Lori-Ann Linkins, R Brian Haynes, Lingyang Chu, Muhammad Afzal, Alfonso Iorio
Given the suboptimal performance of Boolean searching to identify methodologically sound and clinically relevant studies in large bibliographic databases, exploring machine learning (ML) to efficiently classify studies is warranted. To boost the efficiency of a literature surveillance program, we used a large internationally recognized dataset of articles tagged for methodological rigor and applied an automated ML approach to train and test binary classification models to predict the probability of clinical research articles being of high methodologic quality. We trained over 12,000 models on a dataset of titles and abstracts of 97,805 articles indexed in PubMed from 2012-2018 which were manually appraised for rigor by highly trained research associates and rated for clinical relevancy by practicing clinicians. As the dataset is unbalanced, with more articles that do not meet the criteria for rigor, we used the unbalanced dataset and over- and under-sampled datasets. Models that maintained sensitivity for high rigor at 99% and maximized specificity were selected and tested in a retrospective set of 30,424 articles from 2020 and validated prospectively in a blinded study of 5253 articles. The final selected algorithm, combining a LightGBM (gradient boosting machine) model trained in each dataset, maintained high sensitivity and achieved 57% specificity in the retrospective validation test and 53% in the prospective study. The number of articles needed to read to find one that met appraisal criteria was 3.68 (95% CI 3.52 to 3.85) in the prospective study, compared with 4.63 (95% CI 4.50 to 4.77) when relying only on Boolean searching. Gradient-boosting ML models reduced the work required to classify high quality clinical research studies by 45%, improving the efficiency of literature surveillance and subsequent dissemination to clinicians and other evidence users.
鉴于布尔搜索在大型文献数据库中识别方法可靠且与临床相关的研究方面表现不佳,因此有必要探索机器学习(ML)来对研究进行有效分类。为了提高文献监测计划的效率,我们使用了一个国际公认的大型数据集,其中包含了方法学严谨性标记的文章,并应用自动化的 ML 方法来训练和测试二元分类模型,以预测临床研究文章具有高方法学质量的概率。我们在 2012-2018 年期间被 PubM 索引的 97,805 篇文章的标题和摘要数据集上训练了 12,000 多个模型,这些数据集由训练有素的研究人员对其严谨性进行人工评估,并由执业临床医生对其临床相关性进行评级。由于数据集不平衡,不符合严谨性标准的文章较多,因此我们使用了不平衡的数据集以及过度采样和采样不足的数据集。我们从 2020 年的 30424 篇文章中选择并测试了对高严谨性的灵敏度保持在 99%、特异性最大化的模型,并在对 5253 篇文章的盲法研究中进行了前瞻性验证。最终选定的算法结合了在每个数据集中训练的LightGBM(梯度提升机)模型,在回顾性验证测试中保持了较高的灵敏度,特异性达到57%,在前瞻性研究中达到53%。在前瞻性研究中,找到一篇符合鉴定标准的文章所需的阅读篇数为 3.68(95% CI 3.52 至 3.85)篇,而仅依靠布尔搜索时为 4.63(95% CI 4.50 至 4.77)篇。梯度提升 ML 模型将高质量临床研究分类所需的工作量减少了 45%,提高了文献监测以及随后向临床医生和其他证据使用者传播的效率。
{"title":"Boosting efficiency in a clinical literature surveillance system with LightGBM.","authors":"Cynthia Lokker, Wael Abdelkader, Elham Bagheri, Rick Parrish, Chris Cotoi, Tamara Navarro, Federico Germini, Lori-Ann Linkins, R Brian Haynes, Lingyang Chu, Muhammad Afzal, Alfonso Iorio","doi":"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000299","DOIUrl":"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000299","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Given the suboptimal performance of Boolean searching to identify methodologically sound and clinically relevant studies in large bibliographic databases, exploring machine learning (ML) to efficiently classify studies is warranted. To boost the efficiency of a literature surveillance program, we used a large internationally recognized dataset of articles tagged for methodological rigor and applied an automated ML approach to train and test binary classification models to predict the probability of clinical research articles being of high methodologic quality. We trained over 12,000 models on a dataset of titles and abstracts of 97,805 articles indexed in PubMed from 2012-2018 which were manually appraised for rigor by highly trained research associates and rated for clinical relevancy by practicing clinicians. As the dataset is unbalanced, with more articles that do not meet the criteria for rigor, we used the unbalanced dataset and over- and under-sampled datasets. Models that maintained sensitivity for high rigor at 99% and maximized specificity were selected and tested in a retrospective set of 30,424 articles from 2020 and validated prospectively in a blinded study of 5253 articles. The final selected algorithm, combining a LightGBM (gradient boosting machine) model trained in each dataset, maintained high sensitivity and achieved 57% specificity in the retrospective validation test and 53% in the prospective study. The number of articles needed to read to find one that met appraisal criteria was 3.68 (95% CI 3.52 to 3.85) in the prospective study, compared with 4.63 (95% CI 4.50 to 4.77) when relying only on Boolean searching. Gradient-boosting ML models reduced the work required to classify high quality clinical research studies by 45%, improving the efficiency of literature surveillance and subsequent dissemination to clinicians and other evidence users.</p>","PeriodicalId":74465,"journal":{"name":"PLOS digital health","volume":"3 9","pages":"e0000299"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11419392/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142309311","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-23eCollection Date: 2024-09-01DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000619
Gary M Franklin
{"title":"Google's new AI Chatbot produces fake health-related evidence-then self-corrects.","authors":"Gary M Franklin","doi":"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000619","DOIUrl":"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000619","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74465,"journal":{"name":"PLOS digital health","volume":"3 9","pages":"e0000619"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11419366/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142309312","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-19eCollection Date: 2024-09-01DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000574
Jay Chandra, Raymond Lin, Devin Kancherla, Sophia Scott, Daniel Sul, Daniela Andrade, Sammer Marzouk, Jay M Iyer, William Wasswa, Cleva Villanueva, Leo Anthony Celi
In recent years, there has been substantial work in low-cost medical diagnostics based on the physical manifestations of disease. This is due to advancements in data analysis techniques and classification algorithms and the increased availability of computing power through smart devices. Smartphones and their ability to interface with simple sensors such as inertial measurement units (IMUs), microphones, piezoelectric sensors, etc., or with convenient attachments such as lenses have revolutionized the ability collect medically relevant data easily. Even if the data has relatively low resolution or signal to noise ratio, newer algorithms have made it possible to identify disease with this data. Many low-cost diagnostic tools have been created in medical fields spanning from neurology to dermatology to obstetrics. These tools are particularly useful in low-resource areas where access to expensive diagnostic equipment may not be possible. The ultimate goal would be the creation of a "diagnostic toolkit" consisting of a smartphone and a set of sensors and attachments that can be used to screen for a wide set of diseases in a community healthcare setting. However, there are a few concerns that still need to be overcome in low-cost diagnostics: lack of incentives to bring these devices to market, algorithmic bias, "black box" nature of the algorithms, and data storage/transfer concerns.
{"title":"Low-cost and convenient screening of disease using analysis of physical measurements and recordings.","authors":"Jay Chandra, Raymond Lin, Devin Kancherla, Sophia Scott, Daniel Sul, Daniela Andrade, Sammer Marzouk, Jay M Iyer, William Wasswa, Cleva Villanueva, Leo Anthony Celi","doi":"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000574","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000574","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent years, there has been substantial work in low-cost medical diagnostics based on the physical manifestations of disease. This is due to advancements in data analysis techniques and classification algorithms and the increased availability of computing power through smart devices. Smartphones and their ability to interface with simple sensors such as inertial measurement units (IMUs), microphones, piezoelectric sensors, etc., or with convenient attachments such as lenses have revolutionized the ability collect medically relevant data easily. Even if the data has relatively low resolution or signal to noise ratio, newer algorithms have made it possible to identify disease with this data. Many low-cost diagnostic tools have been created in medical fields spanning from neurology to dermatology to obstetrics. These tools are particularly useful in low-resource areas where access to expensive diagnostic equipment may not be possible. The ultimate goal would be the creation of a \"diagnostic toolkit\" consisting of a smartphone and a set of sensors and attachments that can be used to screen for a wide set of diseases in a community healthcare setting. However, there are a few concerns that still need to be overcome in low-cost diagnostics: lack of incentives to bring these devices to market, algorithmic bias, \"black box\" nature of the algorithms, and data storage/transfer concerns.</p>","PeriodicalId":74465,"journal":{"name":"PLOS digital health","volume":"3 9","pages":"e0000574"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11412657/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142302859","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-19eCollection Date: 2024-09-01DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000607
Junko Kameyama, Satoshi Kodera, Yusuke Inoue
{"title":"Ethical, legal, and social issues (ELSI) and reporting guidelines of AI research in healthcare.","authors":"Junko Kameyama, Satoshi Kodera, Yusuke Inoue","doi":"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000607","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000607","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74465,"journal":{"name":"PLOS digital health","volume":"3 9","pages":"e0000607"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11412540/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142302856","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ongoing research attempts to benchmark large language models (LLM) against physicians' fund of knowledge by assessing LLM performance on medical examinations. No prior study has assessed LLM performance on internal medicine (IM) board examination questions. Limited data exists on how knowledge supplied to the models, derived from medical texts improves LLM performance. The performance of GPT-3.5, GPT-4.0, LaMDA and Llama 2, with and without additional model input augmentation, was assessed on 240 randomly selected IM board-style questions. Questions were sourced from the Medical Knowledge Self-Assessment Program released by the American College of Physicians with each question serving as part of the LLM prompt. When available, LLMs were accessed both through their application programming interface (API) and their corresponding chatbot. Mode inputs were augmented with Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine using the method of Retrieval Augmented Generation. LLM-generated explanations to 25 correctly answered questions were presented in a blinded fashion alongside the MKSAP explanation to an IM board-certified physician tasked with selecting the human generated response. GPT-4.0, accessed either through Bing Chat or its API, scored 77.5-80.7% outperforming GPT-3.5, human respondents, LaMDA and Llama 2 in that order. GPT-4.0 outperformed human MKSAP users on every tested IM subject with its highest and lowest percentile scores in Infectious Disease (80th) and Rheumatology (99.7th), respectively. There is a 3.2-5.3% decrease in performance of both GPT-3.5 and GPT-4.0 when accessing the LLM through its API instead of its online chatbot. There is 4.5-7.5% increase in performance of both GPT-3.5 and GPT-4.0 accessed through their APIs after additional input augmentation. The blinded reviewer correctly identified the human generated MKSAP response in 72% of the 25-question sample set. GPT-4.0 performed best on IM board-style questions outperforming human respondents. Augmenting with domain-specific information improved performance rendering Retrieval Augmented Generation a possible technique for improving accuracy in medical examination LLM responses.
{"title":"Performance of Publicly Available Large Language Models on Internal Medicine Board-style Questions.","authors":"Constantine Tarabanis, Sohail Zahid, Marios Mamalis, Kevin Zhang, Evangelos Kalampokis, Lior Jankelson","doi":"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000604","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000604","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ongoing research attempts to benchmark large language models (LLM) against physicians' fund of knowledge by assessing LLM performance on medical examinations. No prior study has assessed LLM performance on internal medicine (IM) board examination questions. Limited data exists on how knowledge supplied to the models, derived from medical texts improves LLM performance. The performance of GPT-3.5, GPT-4.0, LaMDA and Llama 2, with and without additional model input augmentation, was assessed on 240 randomly selected IM board-style questions. Questions were sourced from the Medical Knowledge Self-Assessment Program released by the American College of Physicians with each question serving as part of the LLM prompt. When available, LLMs were accessed both through their application programming interface (API) and their corresponding chatbot. Mode inputs were augmented with Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine using the method of Retrieval Augmented Generation. LLM-generated explanations to 25 correctly answered questions were presented in a blinded fashion alongside the MKSAP explanation to an IM board-certified physician tasked with selecting the human generated response. GPT-4.0, accessed either through Bing Chat or its API, scored 77.5-80.7% outperforming GPT-3.5, human respondents, LaMDA and Llama 2 in that order. GPT-4.0 outperformed human MKSAP users on every tested IM subject with its highest and lowest percentile scores in Infectious Disease (80th) and Rheumatology (99.7th), respectively. There is a 3.2-5.3% decrease in performance of both GPT-3.5 and GPT-4.0 when accessing the LLM through its API instead of its online chatbot. There is 4.5-7.5% increase in performance of both GPT-3.5 and GPT-4.0 accessed through their APIs after additional input augmentation. The blinded reviewer correctly identified the human generated MKSAP response in 72% of the 25-question sample set. GPT-4.0 performed best on IM board-style questions outperforming human respondents. Augmenting with domain-specific information improved performance rendering Retrieval Augmented Generation a possible technique for improving accuracy in medical examination LLM responses.</p>","PeriodicalId":74465,"journal":{"name":"PLOS digital health","volume":"3 9","pages":"e0000604"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11407633/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142302860","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-17eCollection Date: 2024-09-01DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000611
Fernanda Talarico, Dan Metes, Mengzhe Wang, Jake Hayward, Yang S Liu, Julie Tian, Yanbo Zhang, Andrew J Greenshaw, Ashley Gaskin, Magdalena Janus, Bo Cao
Introduction: In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, it becomes important to comprehend service utilization patterns and evaluate disparities in mental health-related service access among children.
Objective: This study uses administrative health records to investigate the association between early developmental vulnerability and healthcare utilization among children in Alberta, Canada from 2016 to 2022.
Methods: Children who participated in the 2016 Early Development Instrument (EDI) assessment and were covered by public Alberta health insurance were included (N = 23 494). Linear regression models were employed to investigate the association between service utilization and vulnerability and biological sex. Separate models were used to assess vulnerability specific to each developmental domain and vulnerability across multiple domains. The service utilization was compared between pre- and post-pandemic onset periods.
Results: The analysis reveals a significant decrease in all health services utilization from 2016 to 2019, followed by an increase until 2022. Vulnerable children had, on average, more events than non-vulnerable children. There was a consistent linear increase in mental health-related utilization from 2016 to 2022, with male children consistently experiencing higher utilization rates than females, particularly among vulnerable children. Specifically, there was a consistent linear increase in the utilization of anxiety-related services by children from 2016 to 2022, with females having, on average, 25 more events than males. The utilization of ADHD-related services showed different patterns for each group, with vulnerable male children having more utilization than their peers.
Conclusion: Utilizing population-wide data, our study reveals sex specific developmental vulnerabilities and its impact on children's mental health service utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic, contributing to the existing literature. With data from kindergarten, we emphasize the need for early and targeted intervention strategies, especially for at-risk children, offering a path to reduce the burden of childhood mental health disorders.
{"title":"Six-year (2016-2022) longitudinal patterns of mental health service utilization rates among children developmentally vulnerable in kindergarten and the COVID-19 pandemic disruption.","authors":"Fernanda Talarico, Dan Metes, Mengzhe Wang, Jake Hayward, Yang S Liu, Julie Tian, Yanbo Zhang, Andrew J Greenshaw, Ashley Gaskin, Magdalena Janus, Bo Cao","doi":"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000611","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000611","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, it becomes important to comprehend service utilization patterns and evaluate disparities in mental health-related service access among children.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study uses administrative health records to investigate the association between early developmental vulnerability and healthcare utilization among children in Alberta, Canada from 2016 to 2022.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Children who participated in the 2016 Early Development Instrument (EDI) assessment and were covered by public Alberta health insurance were included (N = 23 494). Linear regression models were employed to investigate the association between service utilization and vulnerability and biological sex. Separate models were used to assess vulnerability specific to each developmental domain and vulnerability across multiple domains. The service utilization was compared between pre- and post-pandemic onset periods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis reveals a significant decrease in all health services utilization from 2016 to 2019, followed by an increase until 2022. Vulnerable children had, on average, more events than non-vulnerable children. There was a consistent linear increase in mental health-related utilization from 2016 to 2022, with male children consistently experiencing higher utilization rates than females, particularly among vulnerable children. Specifically, there was a consistent linear increase in the utilization of anxiety-related services by children from 2016 to 2022, with females having, on average, 25 more events than males. The utilization of ADHD-related services showed different patterns for each group, with vulnerable male children having more utilization than their peers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Utilizing population-wide data, our study reveals sex specific developmental vulnerabilities and its impact on children's mental health service utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic, contributing to the existing literature. With data from kindergarten, we emphasize the need for early and targeted intervention strategies, especially for at-risk children, offering a path to reduce the burden of childhood mental health disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":74465,"journal":{"name":"PLOS digital health","volume":"3 9","pages":"e0000611"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11407640/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142302862","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-16eCollection Date: 2024-09-01DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000599
Álvaro Ritoré, Claudia M Jiménez, Juan Luis González, Juan Carlos Rejón-Parrilla, Pablo Hervás, Esteban Toro, Carlos Luis Parra-Calderón, Leo Anthony Celi, Isaac Túnez, Miguel Ángel Armengol de la Hoz
{"title":"The role of Open Access Data in democratizing healthcare AI: A pathway to research enhancement, patient well-being and treatment equity in Andalusia, Spain.","authors":"Álvaro Ritoré, Claudia M Jiménez, Juan Luis González, Juan Carlos Rejón-Parrilla, Pablo Hervás, Esteban Toro, Carlos Luis Parra-Calderón, Leo Anthony Celi, Isaac Túnez, Miguel Ángel Armengol de la Hoz","doi":"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000599","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000599","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74465,"journal":{"name":"PLOS digital health","volume":"3 9","pages":"e0000599"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11404816/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142302863","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Electronic medical records (EMRs) have great potential to improve healthcare processes and outcomes. They are increasingly available in Nigeria, as in many developing countries. The impact of their introduction has not been well studied. We sought to synthesize the evidence from primary studies of the effect of EMRs on data quality, patient-relevant outcomes and patient satisfaction. We identified and examined five original research articles published up to May 2023 in the following medical literature databases: PUBMED/Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, African Journals Online and Google Scholar. Four studies examined the influence of the introduction of or improvements in the EMR on data collection and documentation. The pooled percentage difference in data quality after introducing or improving the EMR was 142% (95% CI: 82% to 203%, p-value < 0.001). There was limited heterogeneity in the estimates (I2 = 0%, p-heterogeneity = 0.93) and no evidence suggestive of publication bias. The 5th study assessed patient satisfaction with pharmacy services following the introduction of the EMR but neither had a comparison group nor assessed patient satisfaction before EMR was introduced. We conclude that the introduction of EMR in Nigerian healthcare facilities meaningfully increased the quality of the data.
{"title":"Impact of electronic medical records on healthcare delivery in Nigeria: A review.","authors":"Sarah Oreoluwa Olukorode, Oluwakorede Joshua Adedeji, Adetayo Adetokun, Ajibola Ibraheem Abioye","doi":"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000420","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000420","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Electronic medical records (EMRs) have great potential to improve healthcare processes and outcomes. They are increasingly available in Nigeria, as in many developing countries. The impact of their introduction has not been well studied. We sought to synthesize the evidence from primary studies of the effect of EMRs on data quality, patient-relevant outcomes and patient satisfaction. We identified and examined five original research articles published up to May 2023 in the following medical literature databases: PUBMED/Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, African Journals Online and Google Scholar. Four studies examined the influence of the introduction of or improvements in the EMR on data collection and documentation. The pooled percentage difference in data quality after introducing or improving the EMR was 142% (95% CI: 82% to 203%, p-value < 0.001). There was limited heterogeneity in the estimates (I2 = 0%, p-heterogeneity = 0.93) and no evidence suggestive of publication bias. The 5th study assessed patient satisfaction with pharmacy services following the introduction of the EMR but neither had a comparison group nor assessed patient satisfaction before EMR was introduced. We conclude that the introduction of EMR in Nigerian healthcare facilities meaningfully increased the quality of the data.</p>","PeriodicalId":74465,"journal":{"name":"PLOS digital health","volume":"3 9","pages":"e0000420"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11398640/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142302858","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-12eCollection Date: 2024-09-01DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000603
Andrew Egwar Alunyu, Mercy Rebekah Amiyo, Josephine Nabukenya
Ignoring the need to contextualise international standards has caused low-resourced countries to implement digital health systems on the ad-hoc, thereby often failing to meet the local needs or scale up. Authors have recommended adapting standards to a country's context. However, to date, most resources constrained countries like Uganda have not done so, affecting their success in attaining the full benefits of using ICT to support their health systems. They apply the standards 'as is' with little regard for their fitness for potential use and ability to fulfil the country's digital health needs. A design science approach was followed to elicit digital health communication infrastructure (DHCI) requirements and develop the contextual DHCI standards for Uganda. The design science methodology's design cycle supported DHCI standards' construction and evaluation activities. Whereas two workgroup sessions were held to craft the standards, three cycles of evaluation and refinement were performed. The final refinement produces the contextualised DHCI standards approved by Uganda's DH stakeholders through summative evaluation. Results of the summative evaluation show that DH stakeholders agree that the statement of the standards and the requirements specification are suitable to guide DHCI standards implementation in Uganda. Stakeholders agreed that the standards are complete, have the potential to realise DHCI requirements in Uganda, that have been well structured and follow international style for standards, and finally, that the standards are fit to realise their intended use in Uganda. Having been endorsed by DH stakeholders in Uganda's health system, the standards should be piloted to establish their potency to improve health information exchange and healthcare outcomes. Also, we recommend other low middle income countries (LMICs) with similar challenges to those in Uganda adopt the same set of contextualised DHCI standards.
{"title":"Contextualised digital health communication infrastructure standards for resource-constrained settings: Perception of digital health stakeholders regarding suitability for Uganda's health system.","authors":"Andrew Egwar Alunyu, Mercy Rebekah Amiyo, Josephine Nabukenya","doi":"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000603","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000603","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ignoring the need to contextualise international standards has caused low-resourced countries to implement digital health systems on the ad-hoc, thereby often failing to meet the local needs or scale up. Authors have recommended adapting standards to a country's context. However, to date, most resources constrained countries like Uganda have not done so, affecting their success in attaining the full benefits of using ICT to support their health systems. They apply the standards 'as is' with little regard for their fitness for potential use and ability to fulfil the country's digital health needs. A design science approach was followed to elicit digital health communication infrastructure (DHCI) requirements and develop the contextual DHCI standards for Uganda. The design science methodology's design cycle supported DHCI standards' construction and evaluation activities. Whereas two workgroup sessions were held to craft the standards, three cycles of evaluation and refinement were performed. The final refinement produces the contextualised DHCI standards approved by Uganda's DH stakeholders through summative evaluation. Results of the summative evaluation show that DH stakeholders agree that the statement of the standards and the requirements specification are suitable to guide DHCI standards implementation in Uganda. Stakeholders agreed that the standards are complete, have the potential to realise DHCI requirements in Uganda, that have been well structured and follow international style for standards, and finally, that the standards are fit to realise their intended use in Uganda. Having been endorsed by DH stakeholders in Uganda's health system, the standards should be piloted to establish their potency to improve health information exchange and healthcare outcomes. Also, we recommend other low middle income countries (LMICs) with similar challenges to those in Uganda adopt the same set of contextualised DHCI standards.</p>","PeriodicalId":74465,"journal":{"name":"PLOS digital health","volume":"3 9","pages":"e0000603"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11392385/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142302854","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}