Advances in Therapy最新文献

Early-stage (stage 1–3) chronic kidney disease (CKD) has an asymptomatic presentation such that most people with CKD are unaware of their disease status and remain undiagnosed. CKD is associated with multiple long-term conditions (MLTC), or multimorbidity, the most common of these being cardiovascular disease, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes. Primary care practitioners (PCPs) are crucial in the early identification and management of patients with CKD. For individuals at high risk of CKD, measurements of estimated glomerular filtration rate, urine albumin–creatinine ratio, and blood pressure should be obtained regularly and recorded in a timely manner. The importance of lifestyle changes in the prevention and management of CKD should also be highlighted. A recent addition to the treatment of CKD in people with and without type 2 diabetes has been the recommendation by clinical practice guidelines of a sodium–glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor alongside a renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitor as foundational therapy. SGLT2 inhibitors prevent CKD progression and reduce fatal and non-fatal kidney and cardiovascular events, hospitalization for heart failure, and all-cause mortality, and they have a favorable safety and tolerability profile. However, uptake has been slow, particularly in people with CKD without type 2 diabetes. A multifaceted approach is required to ensure that people with CKD receive optimal kidney protection. Measures to raise awareness of the importance of early identification and intervention include local/national campaigns via social media and practice-based education; clinical education programs; integration of clinical decision support tools into electronic health records; detection programs built around electronic health records; and good interdisciplinary communication. PCPs at the forefront of multidisciplinary care are best placed to implement the evidence-based clinical practice CKD guidelines for lifestyle modification and guideline-directed medical therapy.

Introduction

Fistula is a common complication of Crohn’s disease (CD). Treatment with biologics has been associated with fistula healing. Long-term persistence is an important factor for a chronic inflammatory process such as fistula. This study described 24-month persistence and time-to-surgery endpoints among bio-naïve patients with CD and intestinal fistula who were initiated on ustekinumab.

Methods

Adults with CD and any enteric or perianal fistula initiated on ustekinumab (index date) between September 23, 2016, and March 2, 2022, were selected from the IQVIA PharMetrics^® Plus database and followed up to 24 months. Persistence on ustekinumab (no gaps in days of supply of > 120 days) and composite endpoints of being persistent while on monotherapy and persistent while corticosteroid free were also assessed. The date of surgery was defined as the date of first claim for any CD-related surgeries. Persistence and time-to-surgery endpoints were assessed from the index date until the earliest of discontinuation (event), immunomodulator or other biologic use (event), corticosteroid use (event), date of surgery (event), 24-month follow-up or data end (censoring) using Kaplan-Meier analyses.

Results

The sample included 445 patients (mean age: 42.8 years; 56.6% female). The most common type of fistula was anal fistula (36.0%). At 24 months after ustekinumab initiation, 64.2% of patients remained persistent (95% confidence interval [CI] 55.8–71.4). Furthermore, 53.3% of patients were persistent while on monotherapy (95% CI 45.1–60.7), and 45.6% of patients were persistent while being corticosteroid free (95% CI 36.9–53.8). At 24 months, 22.8% (95% CI 17.0–30.3) of patients underwent any CD-related surgery.

Conclusion

This study quantified long-term persistence on ustekinumab among bio-naïve patients with CD and fistula. Over half of patients initiated on ustekinumab were persistent and persistent while on monotherapy 24 months after initiation. Time-to-surgery estimate was comparable to existing evidence. These findings support ustekinumab as a treatment option for long-term management of CD with fistula.

Introduction

Haemophilia A (HA) is a congenital bleeding disorder caused by a deficiency/absence of factor VIII (FVIII) and characterised by frequent, acute and prolonged spontaneous or traumatic bleeding events, often leading to haemophilic arthropathy and progressive joint deterioration. HA severity is characterized by endogenous FVIII activity: mild (> 5–40%), moderate (1–5%), or severe (< 1%). HA poses a substantial clinical and socioeconomic burden on people with HA (PWHA), their caregivers, and society. This analysis evaluates clinical and patient-centric outcomes of a cohort of individuals with non-inhibitor HA sampled from France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK in the ‘Cost of Haemophilia in Europe: A Socioeconomic Survey II’ (CHESS II) study.

Methods

CHESS II was a cross-sectional burden-of-illness study collecting clinical and socioeconomic data on adult (≥ 18 years) individuals with haemophilia A or B of any severity with or without inhibitors from eight European countries. Descriptive analyses were conducted examining physician-reported demographics, clinical and health resource utilisation information. PWHA-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using the EQ-5D-5L and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) were also examined. Outcomes were stratified by HA severity and reported at country level.

Results

Demographics and clinical characteristics of the cohort (N = 880) were generally consistent across countries. Individuals with severe HA experienced more frequent bleeding events and joint disease despite broad use of factor replacement therapy long-term prophylaxis. A minority of those with mild or moderate HA also experienced such challenges. HRQoL and workforce participation diminished, and chronic pain increased, with increasing HA severity.

Conclusion

This analysis provides up-to-date insights on the impact of HA across five European countries. Increasing HA severity was generally associated with worse clinical outcomes, HRQoL and workforce participation. These findings suggest a place for continued evidence-based tailored treatment and clinical management approaches in addressing the residual burden of HA.

A global rise in the prevalence of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) has led to a considerable and increasing burden to health systems, patients, and society. Sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are proven to reduce incidence of cardio-renal outcomes, including onset of ESKD. Recent post hoc analyses of SGLT2 inhibitor trials extrapolate substantial delays in the average time to ESKD over a patient’s lifetime. In this article, we explore the possible real-world effects of such a delay by considering the available evidence reporting outcomes following onset of ESKD. From the patient perspective, a delay in reaching ESKD could substantially improve health-related quality of life and result in additional life years without the need for kidney replacement therapies, a target relevant to all CKD subpopulations. Furthermore, should a patient initiate dialysis at an older age as a result of CKD progression, the time spent in receipt of dialysis, and therefore associated healthcare costs, may also be reduced. A delay in progression may also lead to changes in the management of ESKD, such as increased election of conservative care in preference to dialysis, particularly in elderly populations. For younger patients with CKD, those who reach ESKD while employed face considerable work impairment and productivity loss, as may families and care partners of working age. Therefore, a delay to the onset of ESKD will reduce the proportion of their working lives affected by productivity losses or unemployment due to medical reasons. In conclusion, optimised treatment of CKD may lead to a shift in treatment options, but proper and timely implementation is essential for the realisation of improved outcomes.

Introduction

Persistence on advanced therapies in ulcerative colitis (UC) is a useful real-world treatment performance measure. This study compared real-world persistence during the maintenance phase among advanced therapy-naïve and -experienced patients with UC initiated on ustekinumab or adalimumab.

Methods

Claims data from the IQVIA PharMetrics^® Plus de-identified database (01/01/2015–06/30/2022) were used to select adult patients with UC treated with ustekinumab or adalimumab based on the agent first initiated (index date) after 10/21/2019. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance cohorts on baseline characteristics. Persistence on the index agent (no gaps in days of supply of > 120 days for ustekinumab or > 60 days for adalimumab), persistence while corticosteroid-free, while on monotherapy, and persistence on the US labeled dose were described and compared during the 12-month period post-index using Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models. Outcomes were analyzed separately among advanced therapy-naïve and advanced therapy-experienced patients.

Results

At 12 months post-index, advanced therapy-naïve patients receiving ustekinumab (n = 371) had higher persistence on the index agent [83.8% vs. 57.6%, hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) = 3.09 (2.29–4.16); p < 0.001), persistence while corticosteroid-free [2.00 (1.63–2.45); p < 0.001], persistence while on monotherapy [2.67 (2.07–3.44); p < 0.001], and persistence on the labeled dose [4.21 (2.76–6.44); p < 0.001] versus those receiving adalimumab (n = 1726). At 12 months post-index, advanced therapy-experienced patients receiving ustekinumab (n = 693) had higher persistence on the index agent [78.1% vs. 59.2%, 2.44 (1.82–3.26); p < 0.001], persistence while corticosteroid-free [1.24 (1.01–1.54); p = 0.0447], persistence while on monotherapy [2.53 (2.00–3.21); p < 0.001], and persistence on the labeled dose [4.77 (3.09–7.35); p < 0.001] versus those receiving adalimumab (n = 254).

Conclusion

This claims-based analysis demonstrated significantly higher treatment persistence, including persistence while corticosteroid-free, persistence while on monotherapy, and persistence on the labeled dose, among both advanced therapy-naïve and advanced therapy-experienced patients with UC initiated on ustekinumab compared to adalimumab.

Introduction

Despite the technological advancements in catheter ablation strategies, the recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) post-ablation remains a concern that requires further investigation. Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists have shown a significant effect on weight reduction, which in turn is associated with freedom from AF recurrence in both patients who are obese and not obese undergoing ablation. Therefore, we aimed to summarize the available evidence on the efficacy of GLP-1 receptor agonists in maintaining sinus rhythm post-ablation.

Methods

Medline, Cochrane Library, and Scopus were searched until June 9, 2024. Double-independent study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed. Evidence was pooled using DerSimonian-Laird random effects meta-analysis.

Results

Three propensity score-matched studies (n = 6031 participants) were analyzed. Over a 12-months follow-up, the use of GLP-1 receptor agonists was associated with a significant reduction in AF recurrence compared to controls, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.549, 95% confidence interval (CI) = [0.315, 0.956], P = 0.034; I² = 57%. No significant heterogeneity was observed (Q statistic = 4.6, heterogeneity P = 0.1).

Conclusion

The use of GLP-1 receptor agonists is associated with a lower risk of AF recurrence in patients receiving AF ablation therapy. Further large-scale randomized trials are necessary to explore the efficacy of GLP-1 receptor agonists in maintaining ablation outcomes over the long term.

Introduction

Associations between increased functional disability and higher healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs were reported in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). We assessed characteristics/outcomes of patients with PsA receiving tofacitinib monotherapy vs combination therapy with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.

Methods

Claims data from Optum^® Clinformatics^® Data Mart (OC) and Merative™ MarketScan^® (MS) databases between December 2017 and February 2020 were analyzed. Outcomes assessed were adherence/persistence by therapy type (monotherapy/combination therapy); HCRU/costs (per patient per month) by periods on-treatment (sum time on tofacitinib) and off-treatment (sum time off tofacitinib [gap of > 60 days]) plus therapy type.

Results

This analysis included 274 and 395 tofacitinib-treated patients in OC (70.4% female, mean age 54.4 years) and MS (68.9% female, mean age 51.4 years), respectively. Percentages of patients with a proportion of days covered ≥ 0.8 at 12 months for monotherapy vs combination therapy were OC, 44.5% vs 53.8%; MS, 36.4% vs 45.7%. Generally similar trends were seen over 24 months and for medication possession ratio ≥ 0.8. Median (95% confidence interval) times to treatment discontinuation for monotherapy vs combination therapy were OC, 10.1 (7.4–11.8) vs 16.7 (8.3–26.6) months; MS, 6.9 (5.6–9.4) vs 11.0 (6.1–13.9) months. During off-treatment vs on-treatment periods, numerical decreases were observed for all-cause (OC, $5383 vs $6149; MS, $4145 vs $5180) and PsA-related costs (OC, $3237 vs $4515; MS, $2703 vs $3907) regardless of therapy type. During off-treatment vs on-treatment periods, numerical increases in outpatient visits for all-cause (OC, 2.37 vs 2.05; MS, 2.15 vs 1.99) and PsA-related visits (OC, 0.60 vs 0.46; MS, 0.47 vs 0.44) were observed, and PsA-related medications numerically decreased (OC, 1.21 vs 1.53; MS, 1.05 vs 1.48).

Conclusion

In this USA-based claims analysis, tofacitinib adherence was numerically lower for patients with PsA receiving monotherapy vs combination therapy. Costs numerically decreased off-treatment vs on-treatment, irrespective of therapy type, driven by lower medication costs.

Introduction

Childhood eye morbidity is a great public health problem, especially in low-income countries. This study aimed to determine the economic burden of childhood ocular morbidity on attending tertiary hospitals in Bangladesh. This study also assessed the catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) for childhood ocular morbidity in Bangladesh.

Methods

A cross-sectional mixed method was used for this study from April to October 2023 at two tertiary hospitals in Bangladesh, one government-funded and one private. Face-to-face interviews using a semi-structured quantitative questionnaire with the caregivers/parents and in-depth interviews (IDIs) were conducted among the same respondents of these two hospitals, and a workshop was conducted with the stakeholders during the study period.

Results

This was the first study in Bangladesh to determine the cost of pediatric ocular morbidity. Among 335 patients, the total median direct cost at a single time was 3740 ± 18,285 BDT (34 ± 166.2 USD) at the government hospital and 7300 ± 40,630 BDT (66.36 ± 369.36 USD) at the private hospital. The disease-specific median overall cost from diagnosis of the disease was 65,000 BDT (591 USD) for squint, 50,000 BDT (454.54 USD) for cataract, and 30,000 BDT (272.72 USD) for eye injury. Almost 90% of the caregivers/parents faced CHE due to different pediatric ocular morbidity.

Conclusions

These cost estimates can be used as an initial basis for financial decisions that aim to enhance access to care, management, and follow-up of children with ocular morbidity. These cost estimates also offer helpful information for organizational and financial sustainability initiatives. Policymakers can consider serious immediate interventions for securing ocular health services in Bangladesh and prevent families from CHE.

Introduction

Evidence on the comparative efficacy and safety of approved therapies for ulcerative colitis (UC) during induction and maintenance, including upadacitinib (UPA), vedolizumab (VEDO), ustekinumab (UST), and tofacitinib (TOFA), is limited.

Methods

Using data from phase 3 trials, three placebo (PBO)-anchored matching-adjusted indirect comparisons of the efficacy and safety of UPA versus VEDO, UST, and TOFA (U-ACHIEVE and U-ACCOMPLISH, GEMINI-1, UNIFI, and OCTAVE induction and maintenance trials) have been conducted. Baseline characteristics from UPA trials were weighted separately to match each comparator trial. Induction responders were re-randomized to oral UPA 15 or 30 mg, VEDO 300 mg intravenously every 8 weeks (Q8W), UST 90 mg SC Q8W, or oral TOFA 5 mg, or PBO in maintenance. Treat-through efficacy outcomes at weeks 44(UST)/46(VEDO)/52(UPA/TOFA) were adjusted by the likelihood of induction response and included clinical response, clinical remission, and endoscopic improvement. Safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), and AEs leading to discontinuation (except UPA vs. VEDO). Benefit–risk was assessed by numbers needed to treat (NNT)/harm, calculated as the inverse of the difference in proportions of patients achieving each efficacy/safety outcome for UPA versus comparator.

Results

The proportions of patients who demonstrated clinical response or endoscopic improvement was greater with UPA 15 mg versus VEDO and TOFA (p < 0.05). The proportions of patients demonstrating all treat-through efficacy outcomes were significantly greater with UPA 30 mg versus VEDO, UST, or TOFA with NNTs 3.2–8.7. No significant differences in proportions of AEs, SAEs, and AEs leading to discontinuation were observed between the two doses of UPA and comparators.

Conclusion

In patients with active UC, greater clinical efficacy, and similar safety after 1 year of maintenance were observed with UPA versus VEDO, UST, and TOFA, suggesting a favorable benefit-risk profile for UPA. Despite matched baseline characteristics, differences in trial design and endpoints may persist.

Introduction

Bipolar I disorder (BD-I) is associated with an increased risk of obesity, but few studies have evaluated the real-world clinical, humanistic, and economic effects associated with obesity in people with BD-I.

Methods

This was a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of responses to the 2016 and 2020 National Health and Wellness surveys. Respondents (18–64 years) with a self-reported physician diagnosis of BD-I were matched to controls without BD-I based on demographic and health characteristics. Respondents were categorized by body mass index as underweight/normal weight (< 25 kg/m²), overweight (25 to < 30 kg/m²), or obese (≥ 30 kg/m²). Multivariable regression models were used to compare obesity-related comorbidities, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), work productivity, and indirect and direct costs.

Results

Before matching, the BD-I cohort was younger than the non-BD-I cohort and included more female and white respondents and a greater proportion covered by Medicaid or Medicare. After matching, the BD-I and non-BD-I cohorts had similar characteristics. A total of 5418 respondents (BD-I, n = 1806; matched controls, n = 3612) were analyzed. Obese respondents with BD-I reported the highest adjusted prevalences of high blood pressure (50%), high cholesterol (35%), sleep apnea (27%), osteoarthritis (17%), type 2 diabetes (12%), and liver disease (4%). Obesity in respondents with BD-I was associated with the lowest HRQoL scores. Measures of work impairment were highest in respondents with BD-I and obesity, as was HCRU. Respondents with BD-I and obesity had the highest associated total indirect and direct medical costs ($25,849 and $44,482, respectively).

Conclusion

Obese respondents with BD-I had greater frequencies of obesity-related comorbidities, higher HCRU, lower HRQoL, greater work impairments, and higher indirect and direct medical costs. These findings highlight the real-world burden of obesity in people with BD-I and the importance of considering treatments that may reduce this burden.