Advances in Therapy最新文献

Introduction

Fabry disease (FD) is a rare lysosomal storage disorder that is associated with pain and progressive damage to the renal, cardiac, and cerebrovascular systems. Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) is one of the treatment options for FD and the most recently approved ERT agent, pegunigalsidase alfa, has shown clinical efficacy in three phase 3 clinical trials of adults with FD: BALANCE, BRIDGE, and BRIGHT. Recent published guidelines support the mapping of health utility state data to the EuroQol-5 Dimension-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) index to align with the preferred methodology used by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Therefore, the primary objective of this study was to estimate EQ-5D-3L values in clinical trials of pegunigalsidase alfa for FD for future cost–utility analyses.

Methods

A mixed effects model was developed to predict values derived from EQ-5D-3L for the following health states used in cost–utility analyses: no Fabry clinical event (FCE)/no pain-related adverse event (AE), pain-related AE, cardiac FCE, cerebrovascular FCE, and renal FCE.

Results

The baseline EQ-5D-3L utility value had a statistically significant (p < 0.0001) impact on utility values, whereas study, age, sex, disease type, treatment arm, kidney function, and serious AE were not statistically significant. Health state utility values with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the final model were as follows: no FCE/no pain-related AE, 0.8005 (0.7675, 0.8334); pain-related AE, 0.7737 (0.7262, 0.8211); cardiac FCE, 0.7189 (0.6274, 0.8103); cerebrovascular FCE, 0.7923 (0.6633, 0.9212); and renal FCE, 0.6881 (0.3887, 0.9874).

Conclusions

The utility values generated by the present study are generally in line with EQ-5D values in the FD literature and can be used to inform both economic evaluations and our understanding of the impact that FD has on quality of life.

Trial Registration

NCT03018730, NCT02795676, NCT03180840.

Hypertension, dyslipidemia, and type 2 diabetes are highly prevalent and poorly controlled cardiometabolic diseases in the Middle East. Therapeutic non-adherence and therapeutic inertia are major contributors to this suboptimal disease control. Regardless of the cardiometabolic disease, evidence-based solutions may be used to improve therapeutic non-adherence and overcome inertia, and thereby help to alleviate the heavy burden of cardiovascular disease in the Middle East. Such solutions include the routine and early use of single-pill combinations, educational initiatives for patients, and multidisciplinary team-based care. This article highlights these and other potential solutions for therapeutic non-adherence and inertia, as discussed at the 2024 Evidence in the Cardiometabolic Environment (EVIDENT) Summit. There is now a ‘call-to-action’ from healthcare providers and other stakeholder groups to ensure that the solutions discussed at this meeting are implemented within health systems in the Middle East to significantly improve cardiovascular outcomes.

Infographic available for this article.

Introduction

Obesity and its complications are associated with high morbidity/mortality and a significant healthcare cost burden in Spain. It is therefore essential to know the potential clinical and economic benefits of reducing obesity. The objective of this study is to predict the decrease in rates of onset of potential complications associated with obesity and the cost savings after a weight loss of 15% over 10 years in Spain.

Methods

Data were combined in an adapted version of a weight loss benefit simulation model. Sources with demographic information on the Spanish population and the distribution of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) were used to obtain the data for the model. In addition, use was made of prevalence data on obesity-associated complications from a cohort of patients with obesity in the United Kingdom (UK). These data were combined by age and sex to create a Spanish synthetic cohort.

Results

The simulation showed that, for a cohort of 100,000 individuals with a body mass index (BMI) of 30–50 kg/m², a weight loss of 15% is estimated to lead to relevant relative risk reductions in obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) (− 56.4%), T2DM (− 39.2%), asthma (− 20.2%) and arterial hypertension (− 18.7%). The estimated overall savings were €105 million for a cohort of 100,000 individuals, mainly resulting from the decrease in T2DM and arterial hypertension (23% and 22% of the total savings at year 10, respectively), as well as osteoarthritis and chronic kidney disease (CKD) (16% and 13%, respectively).

Conclusions

Sustained weight loss could significantly reduce the burden derived from future complications associated to obesity in Spain, as well as the excess economic cost associated with its treatment.

Introduction

Daily oral antipsychotics (OAPs) are the mainstay of schizophrenia treatment; however, long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) are associated with better treatment adherence and improved outcomes.

Methods

This study assessed the real-world comparative effectiveness of LAIs and daily OAPs using claims data from a nationally representative sample of fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries with schizophrenia. Antipsychotic discontinuation, psychiatric hospitalization, and treatment failure were compared relative to different reference groups using within-individual Cox regression models.

Results

The study included 152,835 patients (mean age, 53.5 years; 54.0% male and 61.5% white). LAIs when grouped by dosing intervals were associated with significantly lower risk of antipsychotic discontinuation (hazard ratios [HRs] 0.27–0.69), psychiatric hospitalization (HRs 0.76–0.88), and treatment failure (HRs 0.55–0.74) compared with OAPs. When LAIs of different dosing intervals and OAPs were broken out by type of agent and compared with oral risperidone, second-generation LAIs, specifically LAI paliperidone (every 3 months [Q3M] and monthly [Q1M]), LAI aripiprazole (Q1M), and LAI risperidone (primarily every 2 weeks), had a significantly lower risk of antipsychotic discontinuation (HRs 0.19–0.67), psychiatric hospitalization (HRs 0.76–0.91), and treatment failure (HRs 0.53–0.85). Second-generation LAI paliperidone (Q3M) had the lowest risk for negative outcomes relative to OAPs; this effect was maintained when the reference group was changed to oral risperidone, LAI risperidone, LAI aripiprazole (Q1M), and LAI haloperidol (Q1M) (33–47% lower risk).

Conclusion

Efforts are needed to enhance identification of appropriate candidates for LAIs and increase their uptake, especially longer dosing interval LAIs, in the Medicare population.

Introduction

Incidences of infections with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are still high and treatment guidelines lack specific recommendations for outpatients with Coronavirus-induced disease 2019 (COVID-19). Phytomedicine ELOM-080, an enhancer of mucociliary clearance (MCC), showed benefits as add-on therapy in hospitalised COVID-19 patients.

Methods

This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled proof-of-concept study investigated whether outpatients with mild to moderate acute symptomatic COVID-19 would benefit from a 14-day treatment with ELOM-080 with regard to potential early treatment effects on cough and further typical COVID-19 symptoms. Outpatients with mild to moderate acute symptomatic COVID-19 documented symptom severity and count of coughs on a daily basis. Investigators documented safety and symptom severity during the visits.

Results

This study missed its primary objective, which was reduction in coughing fits in comparison to placebo treatment. In primary analysis, no relevant differences were observed between treatment arms. Data for all randomised patients showed broad heterogeneity in, e.g., time courses of coughing fits, which affected both magnitude and timing of the changes from baseline. However, post hoc analyses with a population with suspected dysfunctional MCC revealed that patients significantly benefitted from treatment with ELOM-080 in terms of reduction in coughing fits (p = 0.0070), difficulty breathing on exertion (p = 0.0252), and earlier remission of symptoms by 1–3 days.

Conclusion

We have shown that patients with dysfunctional MCC benefit from treatment with ELOM-080. These results might be of clinical importance, as up to now no therapy has obtained market approval for the treatment of outpatients with COVID-19.

Trial registration

EudraCT number: 2022-003478-22.

Introduction

Fremanezumab, a monoclonal antibody (mAb) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway, and gepants, small molecule CGRP receptor antagonists, are both approved for the treatment of migraine or its symptoms. This study assessed effectiveness, tolerability, and migraine-related healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) after the addition of fremanezumab for preventive migraine treatment in patients using gepants for acute treatment.

Methods

Data were extracted during a retrospective chart review from electronic medical records from the Dent Neurologic Institute. Eligible patients were ≥ 18 years old, using gepants (rimegepant or ubrogepant), who initiated fremanezumab between January 1, 2020, and May 1, 2021 (index date: date of fremanezumab initiation) and continued concomitant use of gepants and fremanezumab for ≥ 1 month (post-index; between 7–9 months of follow-up). Outcomes included monthly migraine days (MMD), adverse events (AEs), reasons for discontinuation, and migraine-related HCRU.

Results

A total of 55 patients [female, 93%; mean (SD) age, 43.5 (13.5) years] met the inclusion criteria. All patients were diagnosed with chronic migraine. Patients had an average (SD) MMD of 15.8 (7.4) at the index date. Average (SE) change in MMD from index date to post-index was − 6.5 (1.0) days (p < 0.0001). Five patients (9.1%) experienced AEs post-index; no serious AEs (SAEs) were reported. The number of migraine-related medications used decreased from the index date to post-index by a mean of 0.6 for preventive medications (p = 0.070), and 0.8 for acute medications (p = 0.050). The number of outpatient office-based visits also decreased [mean (SD): 6 months pre-index, 5.8 (4.4) vs. 6 months post-index, 4.1 (4.0); p < 0.0001].

Conclusion

The addition of fremanezumab preventively to gepants for acute migraine treatment was effective, resulted in fewer outpatient office visits, and yielded no SAEs or AEs that were novel to these migraine medication classes.

Introduction

The burden of severe asthma on patients, especially on those with concomitant chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), is substantial. Treatment intensification with oral corticosteroids is a common strategy for managing severe asthma exacerbations; however, prolonged exposure to systemic corticosteroids is associated with multisystem toxicity. This study aimed to quantify the association between oral corticosteroid use and annual asthma-related costs in patients with severe asthma with or without CRSwNP.

Methods

This pharmacoeconomic analysis was based on data from the Severe Asthma Network in Italy (SANI) registry. Asthma-related costs were estimated in the context of the Italian healthcare system and included exacerbations requiring treatment intensification, unplanned visits, admissions to hospital and emergency/intensive care units, and lost workdays. For each item, the mean annual cost per patient was estimated based on national tariffs and the frequency of the event. To quantify the association between oral corticosteroid treatment and costs, the study cohort was stratified according to oral corticosteroid use in the 1-year preceding inclusion in the SANI registry.

Results

A total of 669 patients from the SANI registry were included in the present analysis, 255 of whom had concomitant CRSwNP. Corticosteroid use was associated with significantly higher annual disease-related costs per patient compared with no corticosteroid use. Compared with the overall study cohort and patients without CRSwNP, patients with CRSwNP had higher disease-related costs (higher by €1307 and €1869, respectively).

Conclusion

Use of corticosteroids, in particular systemic corticosteroids, is associated with an increase in asthma-related costs. The concomitant presence of CRSwNP impacts negatively on costs. This study suggests that a thorough analysis of costs, expected benefits, and occurrence of adverse events is required when selecting treatment intensification strategies for managing uncontrolled severe asthma.

Introduction

Chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus (CKD-aP) is a common, yet underdiagnosed condition among patients on hemodialysis. Considering the lack of established treatment pathways, we sought to evaluate the use of antidepressant, systemic antihistamines, or gabapentinoid medications among patients with CKD-aP in the year following pruritus assessment.

Methods

We included 6209 patients on hemodialysis in the analysis. We retrospectively extracted clinical and patient-reported data from electronic health records. The intensity of CKD-aP was assessed by KDQOL-36 and 5-D Itch questionnaires. Prescription of antidepressant, antihistamine, and gabapentinoids was ascertained by the occurrence of a relevant active medical order in patients’ medical records.

Results

We observed a consistent and graded association between the severity of CKD-aP and the use of antidepressant, systemic antihistamines, and gabapentinoid medications. This association remained consistent and intensified over the duration of the year after pruritus screening. This trend was robust even after accounting for potential confounding factors.

Conclusions

Patterns of antipruritic medication use in a cohort of patients with CKD-aP was identified and the frequent use of off-label treatments in the absence of approved therapies was highlighted. These observations reflect clinical practices aimed at managing severe pruritus but do not imply a causal relationship between the medications and pruritus severity. Even though we cannot exclude the possibility that these drugs have been prescribed to treat medical conditions warranting their use, previous evidence suggested that doctors may also use such medications in an attempt to buffer CKD-aP. These findings underline the importance of further elucidating current treatment strategies adopted in clinical practice to address CKD-aP.