Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2026-01-19DOI: 10.1007/s12325-025-03470-7
Jadwiga A Wedzicha, Stephen G Noorduyn, Valentina Di Boscio, Olivier Le Rouzic, Anurita Majumdar, Rosirene Paczkowski, Stephen Weng, Guillaume Germain, François Laliberté, David Mannino
Introduction: Three previous publications have reported real-world comparative effectiveness of fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) and budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate (BUD/GLY/FORM) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in the USA. This subgroup analysis assessed treatment with FF/UMEC/VI and BUG/GLY/FORM in patients with COPD who stepped up from dual therapy, stratified by number of prior exacerbations and class of prior dual therapy.
Methods: Propensity score (PS)-weighted patients identified within healthcare claims from the Komodo Research database were used to compare annualized rates and time to first moderate-severe COPD exacerbation between FF/UMEC/VI and BUD/GLY/FORM initiators stepping up from dual therapy, stratified by the type of dual therapy (long-acting muscarinic antagonist plus long-acting β2-agonist [LAMA/LABA] or inhaled corticosteroid [ICS] plus LABA) and by prior (none or ≥ 1) COPD exacerbation. Results are presented as events per patient year (PPY) and rate ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results: Approximately 14,000 patients contributed to this analysis, 10,093 FF/UMEC/VI and 3926 BUD/GLY/FORM initiators. Baseline characteristics were well balanced following PS weighting. Step-up to FF/UMEC/VI was associated with a statistically significant reduction in moderate-severe exacerbations compared with step-up to BUD/GLY/FORM irrespective of exacerbation history: no prior exacerbation, n = 7235, 0.48 vs 0.56 PPY, RR [95% CI] 0.86 [0.77, 0.95], P = 0.003; ≥ 1 prior exacerbation, n = 6784, 1.14 vs 1.41 PPY, RR [95% CI] 0.81 [0.74, 0.87], P < 0.001. Step-up to FF/UMEC/VI was also associated with a statistically significant reduction in moderate-severe exacerbations compared with step-up to BUD/GLY/FORM across both subgroups of prior dual therapy: LAMA/LABA, n = 5717, 0.71 vs 0.95 PPY; RR [95% CI] 0.75 [0.67, 0.83], P < 0.001; ICS/LABA, n = 8302, 0.85 vs 0.99 PPY; RR [95% CI] 0.86 [0.79, 0.93], P < 0.001.
Conclusion: Patients newly initiating FF/UMEC/VI following prior treatment with ICS/LABA or LAMA/LABA experienced a significantly lower rate of moderate-severe COPD exacerbations than those newly initiating BUD/GLY/FORM irrespective of number of prior exacerbations or prior dual therapy class.
在美国,已有三篇先前的出版物报道了糠酸氟替卡松/乌莫利维尼/维兰特罗(FF/UMEC/VI)和布地奈德/甘罗罗酸/富马酸福莫特罗(BUD/GLY/FORM)在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中的实际疗效比较。该亚组分析评估了FF/UMEC/VI和BUG/GLY/FORM对双重治疗后加重的COPD患者的治疗效果,并按既往加重次数和既往双重治疗类别进行分层。方法:使用来自Komodo研究数据库的医疗保健声明中确定的倾向评分(PS)加权患者,比较FF/UMEC/VI和BUD/GLY/FORM启动者从双重治疗中逐步加重的年化率和首次中重度COPD加重时间,按双重治疗类型(长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂加长效β2激动剂[LAMA/LABA]或吸入皮质类固醇[ICS]加LABA)分层,并按先前(无或≥1)COPD加重。结果显示为每患者年事件数(PPY)和95%置信区间(ci)的发生率比(RR)。结果:大约14000名患者参与了这项分析,10093名FF/UMEC/VI和3926名BUD/GLY/FORM启动者。PS加权后,基线特征得到很好的平衡。与加重史无关,升级到FF/UMEC/VI与升级到BUD/GLY/FORM相比,中重度加重的减少具有统计学意义:无加重,n = 7235, 0.48 vs 0.56 PPY, RR [95% CI] 0.86 [0.77, 0.95], P = 0.003;≥1次既往加重,n = 6784, 1.14 vs 1.41 PPY, RR [95% CI] 0.81 [0.74, 0.87], P结论:与既往使用ICS/LABA或LAMA/LABA治疗后新启动FF/UMEC/VI的患者相比,新启动BUD/GLY/FORM的患者,无论既往加重次数或既往双重治疗类别如何,其中重度COPD加重率均显著降低。
{"title":"FF/UMEC/VI and BUD/GLY/FORM in Patients with COPD Stepping Up from Dual Therapy Stratified by Exacerbations and Prior Dual Therapy: A Subgroup Analysis of a Comparative Effectiveness Study.","authors":"Jadwiga A Wedzicha, Stephen G Noorduyn, Valentina Di Boscio, Olivier Le Rouzic, Anurita Majumdar, Rosirene Paczkowski, Stephen Weng, Guillaume Germain, François Laliberté, David Mannino","doi":"10.1007/s12325-025-03470-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12325-025-03470-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Three previous publications have reported real-world comparative effectiveness of fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) and budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate (BUD/GLY/FORM) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in the USA. This subgroup analysis assessed treatment with FF/UMEC/VI and BUG/GLY/FORM in patients with COPD who stepped up from dual therapy, stratified by number of prior exacerbations and class of prior dual therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Propensity score (PS)-weighted patients identified within healthcare claims from the Komodo Research database were used to compare annualized rates and time to first moderate-severe COPD exacerbation between FF/UMEC/VI and BUD/GLY/FORM initiators stepping up from dual therapy, stratified by the type of dual therapy (long-acting muscarinic antagonist plus long-acting β<sub>2</sub>-agonist [LAMA/LABA] or inhaled corticosteroid [ICS] plus LABA) and by prior (none or ≥ 1) COPD exacerbation. Results are presented as events per patient year (PPY) and rate ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 14,000 patients contributed to this analysis, 10,093 FF/UMEC/VI and 3926 BUD/GLY/FORM initiators. Baseline characteristics were well balanced following PS weighting. Step-up to FF/UMEC/VI was associated with a statistically significant reduction in moderate-severe exacerbations compared with step-up to BUD/GLY/FORM irrespective of exacerbation history: no prior exacerbation, n = 7235, 0.48 vs 0.56 PPY, RR [95% CI] 0.86 [0.77, 0.95], P = 0.003; ≥ 1 prior exacerbation, n = 6784, 1.14 vs 1.41 PPY, RR [95% CI] 0.81 [0.74, 0.87], P < 0.001. Step-up to FF/UMEC/VI was also associated with a statistically significant reduction in moderate-severe exacerbations compared with step-up to BUD/GLY/FORM across both subgroups of prior dual therapy: LAMA/LABA, n = 5717, 0.71 vs 0.95 PPY; RR [95% CI] 0.75 [0.67, 0.83], P < 0.001; ICS/LABA, n = 8302, 0.85 vs 0.99 PPY; RR [95% CI] 0.86 [0.79, 0.93], P < 0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients newly initiating FF/UMEC/VI following prior treatment with ICS/LABA or LAMA/LABA experienced a significantly lower rate of moderate-severe COPD exacerbations than those newly initiating BUD/GLY/FORM irrespective of number of prior exacerbations or prior dual therapy class.</p>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1341-1355"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12999749/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145997069","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2026-02-02DOI: 10.1007/s12325-025-03479-y
Nieves Lopez-Muñoz, Noffar Bar, Joris Diels, Suzy van Sanden, João Mendes, Seina Lee, Teresa Hernando, Nikoletta Lendvai, Nitin Patel, Tadao Ishida, Jeremy Er, Simon J Harrison
Introduction: The relative efficacy of ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) and idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) was assessed via unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) using data from the CARTITUDE-4 and CARTITUDE-1 (cilta-cel) and KarMMa-3 (ide-cel) trials. This updated MAIC includes longer follow-up and overall survival (OS).
Methods: An unanchored MAIC was performed utilizing individual patient-level data (IPD) from CARTITUDE-4 [1-3 prior lines of therapy (LOT); n = 208] and CARTITUDE-1 (3-4 prior LOT; n = 37). Patients fulfilling KarMMa-3 inclusion criteria (2-4 prior LOT, triple-class exposed) were selected, and outcomes were compared against published aggregate KarMMa-3 data. Cilta-cel IPD were weighted to match reported baseline characteristics of KarMMa-3 on key prognostic factors identified a priori. Comparative efficacy was estimated for progression-free survival (PFS), OS, overall response rate, very good partial response (VGPR) or better rate, and complete response (CR) or better rate.
Results: Eighty-five patients from CARTITUDE-4 and CARTITUDE-1 were included. After adjustment, patients in the cilta-cel group (effective sample size = 39) had a 58% reduction in PFS risk [hazard ratio (HR) 0.42 (95% CI 0.26-0.68); p = 0.0004] and a 42% reduction in OS risk [HR 0.58 (0.34-0.99); p = 0.0452] versus ide-cel. Patients in the cilta-cel group were significantly more likely to achieve an overall response [relative response ratio (RR) 1.22 (95% CI 1.08-1.38); p = 0.0126] and deeper levels of response [≥ VGPR: RR 1.37 (1.19-1.59); p = 0.0009; ≥ CR: RR 1.80 (1.49-2.18); p < 0.0001] versus ide-cel.
Conclusion: This updated MAIC with longer follow-up time demonstrated significant superiority of cilta-cel over ide-cel in PFS, OS, and response outcomes in patients with triple-class exposed RRMM treated with 2-4 prior LOT. The OS results reinforce the added value of cilta-cel in this population.
{"title":"Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel Versus Idecabtagene Vicleucel in Triple-Class-Exposed Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma with 2-4 Prior Lines of Therapy: Updated Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison.","authors":"Nieves Lopez-Muñoz, Noffar Bar, Joris Diels, Suzy van Sanden, João Mendes, Seina Lee, Teresa Hernando, Nikoletta Lendvai, Nitin Patel, Tadao Ishida, Jeremy Er, Simon J Harrison","doi":"10.1007/s12325-025-03479-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12325-025-03479-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The relative efficacy of ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) and idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) was assessed via unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) using data from the CARTITUDE-4 and CARTITUDE-1 (cilta-cel) and KarMMa-3 (ide-cel) trials. This updated MAIC includes longer follow-up and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An unanchored MAIC was performed utilizing individual patient-level data (IPD) from CARTITUDE-4 [1-3 prior lines of therapy (LOT); n = 208] and CARTITUDE-1 (3-4 prior LOT; n = 37). Patients fulfilling KarMMa-3 inclusion criteria (2-4 prior LOT, triple-class exposed) were selected, and outcomes were compared against published aggregate KarMMa-3 data. Cilta-cel IPD were weighted to match reported baseline characteristics of KarMMa-3 on key prognostic factors identified a priori. Comparative efficacy was estimated for progression-free survival (PFS), OS, overall response rate, very good partial response (VGPR) or better rate, and complete response (CR) or better rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-five patients from CARTITUDE-4 and CARTITUDE-1 were included. After adjustment, patients in the cilta-cel group (effective sample size = 39) had a 58% reduction in PFS risk [hazard ratio (HR) 0.42 (95% CI 0.26-0.68); p = 0.0004] and a 42% reduction in OS risk [HR 0.58 (0.34-0.99); p = 0.0452] versus ide-cel. Patients in the cilta-cel group were significantly more likely to achieve an overall response [relative response ratio (RR) 1.22 (95% CI 1.08-1.38); p = 0.0126] and deeper levels of response [≥ VGPR: RR 1.37 (1.19-1.59); p = 0.0009; ≥ CR: RR 1.80 (1.49-2.18); p < 0.0001] versus ide-cel.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This updated MAIC with longer follow-up time demonstrated significant superiority of cilta-cel over ide-cel in PFS, OS, and response outcomes in patients with triple-class exposed RRMM treated with 2-4 prior LOT. The OS results reinforce the added value of cilta-cel in this population.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov ID: CARTITUDE-1: NCT03548207; CARTITUDE-4: NCT04181827; KarMMa-3: NCT03651128.</p>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1327-1340"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12999602/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146103505","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-28DOI: 10.1007/s12325-026-03520-8
Tassilo Dege, Oliver Steffens, Özlem Kiesel, Iana Bychkova, Lara Leichtfuss, Theresa Schulze-Hagen, Matthias Goebeler, Marc Schmalzing, Jan Leipe, Victor Olsavszky, Patrick-Pascal Strunz, Caroline Glatzel, Astrid Schmieder
Introduction: Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory disease often accompanied by musculoskeletal symptoms and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Early identification of PsA remains challenging, underscoring the need for interdisciplinary care between dermatology and rheumatology. To evaluate the diagnostic and therapeutic impact of an interdisciplinary dermatology-rheumatology board (IDRB) for patients with psoriasis, we initiated a non-randomized, prospective bicentric study.
Methods: A total of 182 patients with psoriasis were enrolled at baseline (V0), of whom 111 completed the 12-month follow-up (V2). Forty-seven (25.8%) patients participated in the IDRB, and 135 (74.2%) patients received standard dermatological care. Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A/D), pain, systemic inflammation, psoriatic arthritis (PsA) diagnosis, and systemic therapy courses were analyzed. Group differences and changes over time were assessed using non-parametric and parametric tests, and predictors of therapy modification were explored using univariate logistic regression.
Results: Over 12 months, patients in the IDRB group showed statistically significant improvements in PASI, DLQI, and HADS-A (all p ≤ 0.05). Among participants without PsA at baseline and with complete PsA documentation at follow-up, new PsA diagnoses occurred more often in the IDRB cohort (31%) than in standard care (9.8%) (Fisher's exact p = 0.0295; χ2 p = 0.0360; OR = 4.14). In univariate analyses, higher baseline PASI, DLQI, and HADS-A values were each associated with subsequent therapy modification. Within the IDRB group, biologic treatments shifted over time toward IL-17- and IL-23-targeted agents, indicating a move toward more streamlined and targeted systemic therapy patterns compared with standard care.
Conclusion: An IDRB may contribute to more structured PsA assessment and to more informed therapeutic decisions in patients with psoriasis. Integrating objective clinical measures together with patient-reported burden appears crucial for guiding treatment modification and optimizing outcomes. Given the non-randomized, self-selected design, these findings should be interpreted as associations.
银屑病是一种慢性炎症性疾病,常伴有肌肉骨骼症状和银屑病关节炎(PsA)。PsA的早期识别仍然具有挑战性,强调需要皮肤病学和风湿病学之间的跨学科护理。为了评估跨学科皮肤科-风湿病学委员会(IDRB)对牛皮癣患者的诊断和治疗影响,我们启动了一项非随机、前瞻性双中心研究。方法:182例牛皮癣患者在基线(V0)时入组,其中111例完成了12个月的随访(V2)。47例(25.8%)患者参加了IDRB, 135例(74.2%)患者接受了标准的皮肤病学护理。分析银屑病面积及严重程度指数(PASI)、皮肤病生活质量指数(DLQI)、医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS-A/D)、疼痛、全身炎症、银屑病关节炎(PsA)诊断及全身治疗疗程。使用非参数检验和参数检验评估组间差异和随时间的变化,并使用单变量逻辑回归探讨治疗修改的预测因子。结果:IDRB组患者在12个月内PASI、DLQI、HADS-A的改善均有统计学意义(p≤0.05)。在基线时无PsA和随访时有完整PsA记录的参与者中,IDRB队列中新PsA诊断的发生率(31%)高于标准治疗组(9.8%)(Fisher精确p = 0.0295; χ2 p = 0.0360; OR = 4.14)。在单变量分析中,较高的基线PASI、DLQI和HADS-A值均与随后的治疗修改相关。在IDRB组中,随着时间的推移,生物治疗转向了靶向IL-17和il -23的药物,这表明与标准治疗相比,生物治疗朝着更精简、更有针对性的全身治疗模式发展。结论:IDRB可能有助于银屑病患者更结构化的PsA评估和更明智的治疗决策。将客观的临床措施与患者报告的负担结合起来,对于指导治疗修改和优化结果至关重要。考虑到非随机、自我选择的设计,这些发现应该被解释为关联。试验注册:DRKS-Deutsches Register Klinischer student注册号:DRKS00037907。
{"title":"Joint Assessment Matters: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Benefits of Interdisciplinary Psoriasis Care.","authors":"Tassilo Dege, Oliver Steffens, Özlem Kiesel, Iana Bychkova, Lara Leichtfuss, Theresa Schulze-Hagen, Matthias Goebeler, Marc Schmalzing, Jan Leipe, Victor Olsavszky, Patrick-Pascal Strunz, Caroline Glatzel, Astrid Schmieder","doi":"10.1007/s12325-026-03520-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-026-03520-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory disease often accompanied by musculoskeletal symptoms and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Early identification of PsA remains challenging, underscoring the need for interdisciplinary care between dermatology and rheumatology. To evaluate the diagnostic and therapeutic impact of an interdisciplinary dermatology-rheumatology board (IDRB) for patients with psoriasis, we initiated a non-randomized, prospective bicentric study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 182 patients with psoriasis were enrolled at baseline (V0), of whom 111 completed the 12-month follow-up (V2). Forty-seven (25.8%) patients participated in the IDRB, and 135 (74.2%) patients received standard dermatological care. Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A/D), pain, systemic inflammation, psoriatic arthritis (PsA) diagnosis, and systemic therapy courses were analyzed. Group differences and changes over time were assessed using non-parametric and parametric tests, and predictors of therapy modification were explored using univariate logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 12 months, patients in the IDRB group showed statistically significant improvements in PASI, DLQI, and HADS-A (all p ≤ 0.05). Among participants without PsA at baseline and with complete PsA documentation at follow-up, new PsA diagnoses occurred more often in the IDRB cohort (31%) than in standard care (9.8%) (Fisher's exact p = 0.0295; χ<sup>2</sup> p = 0.0360; OR = 4.14). In univariate analyses, higher baseline PASI, DLQI, and HADS-A values were each associated with subsequent therapy modification. Within the IDRB group, biologic treatments shifted over time toward IL-17- and IL-23-targeted agents, indicating a move toward more streamlined and targeted systemic therapy patterns compared with standard care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An IDRB may contribute to more structured PsA assessment and to more informed therapeutic decisions in patients with psoriasis. Integrating objective clinical measures together with patient-reported burden appears crucial for guiding treatment modification and optimizing outcomes. Given the non-randomized, self-selected design, these findings should be interpreted as associations.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>DRKS-Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien listing: DRKS00037907.</p>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147315843","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-28DOI: 10.1007/s12325-026-03522-6
Justin M Watts, Eunice S Wang, Brian A Jonas, Florence R Wilson, Julie E Park, Shannon Cope, Aaron Sheppard, Amber Thomassen, Stéphane de Botton, Jorge E Cortes
Introduction: Olutasidenib and ivosidenib are isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) inhibitors approved for relapsed/refractory (R/R) IDH1 mutant (IDH1m) acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
Methods: A matching-adjusted indirect comparison estimated relative treatment effects using registrational Phase I/II data for olutasidenib (Study 2102-HEM-101; individual patient data) and ivosidenib (Study AG120-C-001; study-level data) since a head-to-head trial is unlikely. Weights were estimated using a logistic propensity score model adjusted for pre-defined covariates identified from a literature review, validated by clinical experts. Eight covariates were determined to be the most important prognostic factors/effect modifiers for the target population as reported in the Food and Drug Administration labels: number of prior systemic therapies, age, prior hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, AML type, relapse type, cytogenetic risk, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and IDH1 mutation.
Results: Olutasidenib versus ivosidenib adjusted rates of complete remission (CR; odds ratio [OR] 1.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61-2.08), CR plus CR with partial hematologic recovery (CR + CRh; OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.46-1.50), and median CR duration (difference in medians 11.18 months, 95% CI - 4.30 to 22.72) were not significantly different. Median CR + CRh duration was significantly longer for olutasidenib (difference in medians 9.84 months, 95% CI 3.24-22.28), accompanied by a numerical non-significant trend in overall survival that should be considered exploratory (hazard ratio 0.75, 95% CI 0.53-1.07).
Conclusion: While not confirmatory, these findings may be clinically relevant in the context of this difficult-to-treat R/R IDH1m AML population.
Olutasidenib和ivosidenib是异柠檬酸脱氢酶1 (IDH1)抑制剂,被批准用于复发/难治性(R/R) IDH1突变体(IDH1m)急性髓性白血病(AML)。方法:由于不太可能进行正面试验,因此使用olutasidenib(研究2102-HEM-101;个体患者数据)和ivosidenib(研究AG120-C-001;研究水平数据)的注册I/II期数据进行匹配调整的间接比较估计了相对治疗效果。使用逻辑倾向评分模型对从文献综述中确定的预定义协变量进行调整,并经临床专家验证,估计权重。8个协变量被确定为目标人群最重要的预后因素/效果调节剂,如美国食品和药物管理局标签所报告的:既往全身治疗次数、年龄、既往造血干细胞移植、AML类型、复发类型、细胞遗传学风险、东部肿瘤合作组(Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group)的表现状态和IDH1突变。结果:Olutasidenib与ivosidenib调整的完全缓解率(CR;优势比[OR] 1.12, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.61-2.08)、CR +部分血清学恢复的CR (CR + CRh; OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.46-1.50)和中位CR持续时间(中位差异为11.18个月,95% CI - 4.30至22.72)无显著差异。olutasidenib的中位CR + CRh持续时间明显更长(中位差异为9.84个月,95% CI 3.24-22.28),总生存期的数值趋势不显著,应被视为探索性的(风险比0.75,95% CI 0.53-1.07)。结论:虽然没有证实性,但这些发现可能在难以治疗的R/R IDH1m AML人群中具有临床相关性。
{"title":"Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of Olutasidenib and Ivosidenib in Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1-Mutated Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia.","authors":"Justin M Watts, Eunice S Wang, Brian A Jonas, Florence R Wilson, Julie E Park, Shannon Cope, Aaron Sheppard, Amber Thomassen, Stéphane de Botton, Jorge E Cortes","doi":"10.1007/s12325-026-03522-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-026-03522-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Olutasidenib and ivosidenib are isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) inhibitors approved for relapsed/refractory (R/R) IDH1 mutant (IDH1m) acute myeloid leukemia (AML).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A matching-adjusted indirect comparison estimated relative treatment effects using registrational Phase I/II data for olutasidenib (Study 2102-HEM-101; individual patient data) and ivosidenib (Study AG120-C-001; study-level data) since a head-to-head trial is unlikely. Weights were estimated using a logistic propensity score model adjusted for pre-defined covariates identified from a literature review, validated by clinical experts. Eight covariates were determined to be the most important prognostic factors/effect modifiers for the target population as reported in the Food and Drug Administration labels: number of prior systemic therapies, age, prior hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, AML type, relapse type, cytogenetic risk, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and IDH1 mutation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Olutasidenib versus ivosidenib adjusted rates of complete remission (CR; odds ratio [OR] 1.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61-2.08), CR plus CR with partial hematologic recovery (CR + CRh; OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.46-1.50), and median CR duration (difference in medians 11.18 months, 95% CI - 4.30 to 22.72) were not significantly different. Median CR + CRh duration was significantly longer for olutasidenib (difference in medians 9.84 months, 95% CI 3.24-22.28), accompanied by a numerical non-significant trend in overall survival that should be considered exploratory (hazard ratio 0.75, 95% CI 0.53-1.07).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While not confirmatory, these findings may be clinically relevant in the context of this difficult-to-treat R/R IDH1m AML population.</p>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147315884","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-28DOI: 10.1007/s12325-026-03526-2
Melita Irving, Elena Greco, Alessandra Cocca, Andrew Dauber, Alexander Augusto de Lima Jorge, Svein Fredwall, Amy Patterson, Juan Llerena, Keiichi Ozono, Rui Santos, Dominique Kelly, Elena Muslimova, Tejaswini Reddi, Renée Shediac, Ravi Savarirayan, V Reid Sutton, Julie Hoover-Fong, Moira Cheung
Introduction: Hypochondroplasia (HCH) is a disproportionate short-statured skeletal dysplasia condition caused by gain-of-function pathogenic variants in the fibroblast growth receptor 3 gene (FGFR3). Although HCH typically becomes clinically apparent after the first year of life, when height discrepancy compared with the general population becomes more pronounced, diagnosis is often delayed by several years. Early recognition of HCH is challenging because of wide phenotypic variability and subtle clinical and radiographic features, leading to delayed or missed diagnosis. Furthermore, wide variant heterogeneity and restrictive testing criteria can contribute to diagnostic delays. Early diagnosis may facilitate timely clinical management and psychosocial support. However, no standardized diagnostic criteria for HCH currently exist, nor are diagnostic pathways well described in the literature.
Methods: In October 2024, 14 experts across multiple specialties completed an online survey on current clinical practices for diagnosing HCH. A subset convened in person to discuss strategies to optimize clinical diagnostic pathways, which were subsequently refined by the collective group.
Results: Age-specific diagnostic opportunities were identified. Prenatally, sonographic features of HCH may be detectable from approximately 20 weeks' gestation. Postnatally, features suggestive of HCH include a sustained fall in length/height centiles over the first 2 years of life, relative macrocephaly, neonatal seizures, and specific radiographic and neuroimaging findings. Between ages 2-3 years, a characteristic growth pattern including limb shortening and body disproportion may become evident. Neurocognitive involvement including neurodevelopmental challenges may become apparent. HCH should be considered in the differential diagnosis of idiopathic or isolated short stature. Genetic testing panels that include FGFR3 and evaluation of short-statured parents can support diagnosis.
Conclusion: Early diagnosis of HCH is achievable when age-specific key clinical and radiologic features are recognized and supported by molecular testing using appropriate diagnostic platforms. This work represents an important first step towards developing consensus-based diagnostic guidelines for HCH.
{"title":"Pathways to Facilitate Early Recognition and Diagnosis of Hypochondroplasia.","authors":"Melita Irving, Elena Greco, Alessandra Cocca, Andrew Dauber, Alexander Augusto de Lima Jorge, Svein Fredwall, Amy Patterson, Juan Llerena, Keiichi Ozono, Rui Santos, Dominique Kelly, Elena Muslimova, Tejaswini Reddi, Renée Shediac, Ravi Savarirayan, V Reid Sutton, Julie Hoover-Fong, Moira Cheung","doi":"10.1007/s12325-026-03526-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12325-026-03526-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hypochondroplasia (HCH) is a disproportionate short-statured skeletal dysplasia condition caused by gain-of-function pathogenic variants in the fibroblast growth receptor 3 gene (FGFR3). Although HCH typically becomes clinically apparent after the first year of life, when height discrepancy compared with the general population becomes more pronounced, diagnosis is often delayed by several years. Early recognition of HCH is challenging because of wide phenotypic variability and subtle clinical and radiographic features, leading to delayed or missed diagnosis. Furthermore, wide variant heterogeneity and restrictive testing criteria can contribute to diagnostic delays. Early diagnosis may facilitate timely clinical management and psychosocial support. However, no standardized diagnostic criteria for HCH currently exist, nor are diagnostic pathways well described in the literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In October 2024, 14 experts across multiple specialties completed an online survey on current clinical practices for diagnosing HCH. A subset convened in person to discuss strategies to optimize clinical diagnostic pathways, which were subsequently refined by the collective group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Age-specific diagnostic opportunities were identified. Prenatally, sonographic features of HCH may be detectable from approximately 20 weeks' gestation. Postnatally, features suggestive of HCH include a sustained fall in length/height centiles over the first 2 years of life, relative macrocephaly, neonatal seizures, and specific radiographic and neuroimaging findings. Between ages 2-3 years, a characteristic growth pattern including limb shortening and body disproportion may become evident. Neurocognitive involvement including neurodevelopmental challenges may become apparent. HCH should be considered in the differential diagnosis of idiopathic or isolated short stature. Genetic testing panels that include FGFR3 and evaluation of short-statured parents can support diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early diagnosis of HCH is achievable when age-specific key clinical and radiologic features are recognized and supported by molecular testing using appropriate diagnostic platforms. This work represents an important first step towards developing consensus-based diagnostic guidelines for HCH.</p>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147315862","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-26DOI: 10.1007/s12325-026-03515-5
Baharudin Abdullah, So Fie Tan, Shinee Tan, Zahiruddin Wan Mohammad, Andy Watson, Adrian Shephard
Introduction: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is exacerbated by the ongoing misuse of antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs), and it is vital to try and determine factors associated with antibiotic misuse. The Sore Throat and Antibiotic Resistance (STAR) study aims to evaluate public knowledge, perceptions, and behaviors to antibiotic use for acute URTIs and sore throat in Malaysia.
Methods: A nationwide online survey was carried out in June 2024 among Malaysian adults who reported having sore throats with other URTI symptoms in the past six months using a random sampling method. A 26-item (plus 5 for screening) self-administered questionnaire, adapted from the Eurobarometer survey on AMR, was shared through the Toluna online panel. The questionnaire included four sections that covered demographic details, URTI symptom patterns, antibiotic use, and self-medication practices for symptomatic relief, as well as knowledge, perceptions, and behaviors about these practices.
Results: Among 1031 respondents, sore throat was the most common symptom (62%). It often occurred significantly (p < 0.001) with cough (51.4%) and flu-like symptoms (53.8%). Antibiotic use was high, with 72% using them for respiratory illnesses and 33.4% for sore throat. Self-medication for symptomatic relief occurred mostly for sore throat (62%). While 78% had seen AMR messages and 70% knew about antibiotic risks, many held misconceptions: 66.1% thought antibiotics relieve pain and 72.5% believed they speed recovery. Confidence in non-antibiotic care was low at 42%, and 80% expressed anxiety about not using antibiotics. Unsafe behaviors included keeping leftover antibiotics (34%) and stopping treatment early (45%).
Conclusions: This study found a significant gap between perceived knowledge and practice as well as behaviors that contribute to inappropriate antibiotic use. These findings emphasize the need for targeted interventions such as public education, improved communication between healthcare providers and patients, including the benefits of a pro-symptomatic approach to first line management.
{"title":"The Sore Throat and Antibiotic Resistance (STAR) Study in Malaysia: Nationwide Survey of Antibiotic Use for Upper Respiratory Tract Infection and Sore Throat.","authors":"Baharudin Abdullah, So Fie Tan, Shinee Tan, Zahiruddin Wan Mohammad, Andy Watson, Adrian Shephard","doi":"10.1007/s12325-026-03515-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-026-03515-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is exacerbated by the ongoing misuse of antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs), and it is vital to try and determine factors associated with antibiotic misuse. The Sore Throat and Antibiotic Resistance (STAR) study aims to evaluate public knowledge, perceptions, and behaviors to antibiotic use for acute URTIs and sore throat in Malaysia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nationwide online survey was carried out in June 2024 among Malaysian adults who reported having sore throats with other URTI symptoms in the past six months using a random sampling method. A 26-item (plus 5 for screening) self-administered questionnaire, adapted from the Eurobarometer survey on AMR, was shared through the Toluna online panel. The questionnaire included four sections that covered demographic details, URTI symptom patterns, antibiotic use, and self-medication practices for symptomatic relief, as well as knowledge, perceptions, and behaviors about these practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1031 respondents, sore throat was the most common symptom (62%). It often occurred significantly (p < 0.001) with cough (51.4%) and flu-like symptoms (53.8%). Antibiotic use was high, with 72% using them for respiratory illnesses and 33.4% for sore throat. Self-medication for symptomatic relief occurred mostly for sore throat (62%). While 78% had seen AMR messages and 70% knew about antibiotic risks, many held misconceptions: 66.1% thought antibiotics relieve pain and 72.5% believed they speed recovery. Confidence in non-antibiotic care was low at 42%, and 80% expressed anxiety about not using antibiotics. Unsafe behaviors included keeping leftover antibiotics (34%) and stopping treatment early (45%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found a significant gap between perceived knowledge and practice as well as behaviors that contribute to inappropriate antibiotic use. These findings emphasize the need for targeted interventions such as public education, improved communication between healthcare providers and patients, including the benefits of a pro-symptomatic approach to first line management.</p>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147288756","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-25DOI: 10.1007/s12325-026-03519-1
Thomas Campbell-James, Stefan Buff, Giliane Nanchen, Andrew Hall, Thomas Rosemann, Lindsay Nicholson, Stacey Priest, Anthony Zara, Luke Hubbert, Caterina Vecchio Rodriguez, George Wharton, Menno Pruijm
Introduction: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a leading cause of global morbidity and mortality, affecting one in ten Swiss adults. Patient numbers are expected to increase due to demographic shift and increasing comorbidity rates, necessitating strategic healthcare planning. Holistic burden remains unknown and detailed projections-including expectations of prospective economic and environmental impact-are lacking. To inform Switzerland's public health strategies and support its 2050 net-zero healthcare goal, this study aims to forecast the multidimensional burdens of CKD.
Methods: The IMPACT-CKD microsimulation model was utilised to project CKD-progression and clinical, healthcare resource utilisation, economic, societal, and environmental outcomes in Switzerland over 10 years (2023-2032). Modelled individuals were assigned CKD-relevant characteristics-including kidney function, comorbidities and clinical events-based on real-world data. Individuals were categorised into non-CKD or one of six CKD stages and progressed through the disease, diagnosed or undiagnosed. Model inputs and outcomes were validated and calibrated against literature, real-world evidence, and expert consultation.
Results: By 2032, IMPACT-CKD projects Switzerland's cases of CKD to rise by 6.7% (0.96m to 1.03m) with late-stage CKD and kidney replacement therapy (KRT) surging by 18.1% (437k to 516k) and 57.2% (8.4k to 13.2k). CKD-related healthcare costs are projected to increase by 27.6% (Swiss francs [CHF] 3.3b to CHF 4.2b), driven by a 77.3% rise KRT-related costs. CKD would account for 4.6% of the Swiss healthcare budget, incur CHF 12.9b in lost productivity, 43.2m missed workdays and CHF 606m in lost tax revenue. Greenhouse gas emissions are projected to increase by 12.9%, driven by rising dialysis demand.
Conclusion: IMPACT-CKD projects substantial increases in the multidimensional burdens of CKD in Switzerland. Impact could be mitigated via earlier detection and broader uptake of guideline-directed medical therapy. Comprehensive health policies and strategic public health planning are necessary to reduce burden and sustain Switzerland's 2050 net-zero healthcare ambition.
{"title":"System Preparedness for Rising Kidney Replacement Therapy Demand: Late-Stage CKD Drives Costs, Healthcare Resource Utilisation and Environmental Impact in Switzerland.","authors":"Thomas Campbell-James, Stefan Buff, Giliane Nanchen, Andrew Hall, Thomas Rosemann, Lindsay Nicholson, Stacey Priest, Anthony Zara, Luke Hubbert, Caterina Vecchio Rodriguez, George Wharton, Menno Pruijm","doi":"10.1007/s12325-026-03519-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-026-03519-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a leading cause of global morbidity and mortality, affecting one in ten Swiss adults. Patient numbers are expected to increase due to demographic shift and increasing comorbidity rates, necessitating strategic healthcare planning. Holistic burden remains unknown and detailed projections-including expectations of prospective economic and environmental impact-are lacking. To inform Switzerland's public health strategies and support its 2050 net-zero healthcare goal, this study aims to forecast the multidimensional burdens of CKD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The IMPACT-CKD microsimulation model was utilised to project CKD-progression and clinical, healthcare resource utilisation, economic, societal, and environmental outcomes in Switzerland over 10 years (2023-2032). Modelled individuals were assigned CKD-relevant characteristics-including kidney function, comorbidities and clinical events-based on real-world data. Individuals were categorised into non-CKD or one of six CKD stages and progressed through the disease, diagnosed or undiagnosed. Model inputs and outcomes were validated and calibrated against literature, real-world evidence, and expert consultation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>By 2032, IMPACT-CKD projects Switzerland's cases of CKD to rise by 6.7% (0.96m to 1.03m) with late-stage CKD and kidney replacement therapy (KRT) surging by 18.1% (437k to 516k) and 57.2% (8.4k to 13.2k). CKD-related healthcare costs are projected to increase by 27.6% (Swiss francs [CHF] 3.3b to CHF 4.2b), driven by a 77.3% rise KRT-related costs. CKD would account for 4.6% of the Swiss healthcare budget, incur CHF 12.9b in lost productivity, 43.2m missed workdays and CHF 606m in lost tax revenue. Greenhouse gas emissions are projected to increase by 12.9%, driven by rising dialysis demand.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IMPACT-CKD projects substantial increases in the multidimensional burdens of CKD in Switzerland. Impact could be mitigated via earlier detection and broader uptake of guideline-directed medical therapy. Comprehensive health policies and strategic public health planning are necessary to reduce burden and sustain Switzerland's 2050 net-zero healthcare ambition.</p>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147281810","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-20DOI: 10.1007/s12325-026-03509-3
Melissa D Svoboda, Nancy Kuntz, Carmen Leon-Astudillo, Barry J Byrne, Jena Krueger, Jennifer M Kwon, Cory Sieburg, Diana Castro
This Summary of Research summarizes a previously published original article, "Risdiplam treatment following onasemnogene abeparvovec in individuals with spinal muscular atrophy: a multicenter case series." Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a rare genetic disease that causes muscle weakness and is associated with swallowing and breathing difficulties. Risdiplam (EVRYSDI®) and onasemnogene abeparvovec (OA, ZOLGENSMA®) are two medications approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of individuals with SMA. This study explored the clinical benefits and safety of using risdiplam after OA in children with SMA. All children whose muscle movement was assessed showed stability or improvement after risdiplam initiation, and around one in three children saw improvements in swallowing and decreased usage of respiratory support. Risdiplam treatment was well tolerated. This study may help to improve understanding of the potential risks and benefits of using risdiplam treatment after OA treatment in children with SMA. Further studies including more children are necessary.
{"title":"Summary of Research: Risdiplam Treatment Following Onasemnogene Abeparvovec in Individuals with Spinal Muscular Atrophy: A Multicenter Case Series.","authors":"Melissa D Svoboda, Nancy Kuntz, Carmen Leon-Astudillo, Barry J Byrne, Jena Krueger, Jennifer M Kwon, Cory Sieburg, Diana Castro","doi":"10.1007/s12325-026-03509-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-026-03509-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This Summary of Research summarizes a previously published original article, \"Risdiplam treatment following onasemnogene abeparvovec in individuals with spinal muscular atrophy: a multicenter case series.\" Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a rare genetic disease that causes muscle weakness and is associated with swallowing and breathing difficulties. Risdiplam (EVRYSDI<sup>®</sup>) and onasemnogene abeparvovec (OA, ZOLGENSMA<sup>®</sup>) are two medications approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of individuals with SMA. This study explored the clinical benefits and safety of using risdiplam after OA in children with SMA. All children whose muscle movement was assessed showed stability or improvement after risdiplam initiation, and around one in three children saw improvements in swallowing and decreased usage of respiratory support. Risdiplam treatment was well tolerated. This study may help to improve understanding of the potential risks and benefits of using risdiplam treatment after OA treatment in children with SMA. Further studies including more children are necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146257102","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-20DOI: 10.1007/s12325-026-03501-x
Peter Hedera, Megan Teynor, Carey Strader, Halley Costantino, Michael Schultze, Divine Akumo, Karl Heinz Weiss
Introduction: Wilson disease (WD) is a rare inherited disorder that causes copper accumulation and can be fatal if untreated. This study used real-world data from the US Komodo Health claims database to describe healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and evaluate direct economic costs among patients with WD.
Methods: This retrospective observational study identified patients with WD using ICD-9/10 codes (excluding Menkes disease) between 2016 and 2019, with data spanning 2012-2020. Sociodemographic characteristics, HCRU, and costs were analyzed using SPSS v23, SAS v9.4, and R v3.6.0. The study was approved by Pearl Pathways IRB (#20-KANT-224).
Results: A total of 2115 patients with prevalent WD, including 360 ever-treated (with reimbursable WD prescriptions), were identified. During the 2-year follow-up, about 25% were hospitalized, with a mean stay of 9 days, and most visited the ER three times annually. Hepatic patients with WD were more likely to undergo liver biopsy or transplant but had fewer home health visits and less use of assistive mobility devices. Annual liver transplant costs averaged $9094.72 ± 8110.23 per prevalent WD patient and $10,147.98 ± 7030.83 per ever-treated patient. Mean annual costs per prevalent versus ever-treated patients with WD were inpatient ($716.52 ± 2675.06 vs. $252.75 ± 333.39), pharmacy ($270.35 ± 1348.79 vs. $1284.51 ± 2994.85), and outpatient ($73.93 ± 156.89 vs. $60.82 ± 62.17), respectively. Pharmacy costs for adherent patients averaged $157,505.28 for any medication, $252,617.11 for D-penicillamine, $189,328.52 for trientine, and $1574.91 for zinc. Among ever-treated patients with WD, respective costs were lower at $85,117.60, $123,190.73, $100,017.20, and $820.35.
Conclusion: Estimated annual HCRU and treatment costs for patients with WD were lower than previously reported. These findings provide updated real-world insights into the economic burden of WD and highlight the cost implications of medication adherence in managing this rare disorder in the USA.
{"title":"Patient Burden in the Treatment of Wilson Disease in the United States: An Analysis of Real-World Health Insurance Claims Data from the Komodo database.","authors":"Peter Hedera, Megan Teynor, Carey Strader, Halley Costantino, Michael Schultze, Divine Akumo, Karl Heinz Weiss","doi":"10.1007/s12325-026-03501-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-026-03501-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Wilson disease (WD) is a rare inherited disorder that causes copper accumulation and can be fatal if untreated. This study used real-world data from the US Komodo Health claims database to describe healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and evaluate direct economic costs among patients with WD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study identified patients with WD using ICD-9/10 codes (excluding Menkes disease) between 2016 and 2019, with data spanning 2012-2020. Sociodemographic characteristics, HCRU, and costs were analyzed using SPSS v23, SAS v9.4, and R v3.6.0. The study was approved by Pearl Pathways IRB (#20-KANT-224).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2115 patients with prevalent WD, including 360 ever-treated (with reimbursable WD prescriptions), were identified. During the 2-year follow-up, about 25% were hospitalized, with a mean stay of 9 days, and most visited the ER three times annually. Hepatic patients with WD were more likely to undergo liver biopsy or transplant but had fewer home health visits and less use of assistive mobility devices. Annual liver transplant costs averaged $9094.72 ± 8110.23 per prevalent WD patient and $10,147.98 ± 7030.83 per ever-treated patient. Mean annual costs per prevalent versus ever-treated patients with WD were inpatient ($716.52 ± 2675.06 vs. $252.75 ± 333.39), pharmacy ($270.35 ± 1348.79 vs. $1284.51 ± 2994.85), and outpatient ($73.93 ± 156.89 vs. $60.82 ± 62.17), respectively. Pharmacy costs for adherent patients averaged $157,505.28 for any medication, $252,617.11 for D-penicillamine, $189,328.52 for trientine, and $1574.91 for zinc. Among ever-treated patients with WD, respective costs were lower at $85,117.60, $123,190.73, $100,017.20, and $820.35.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Estimated annual HCRU and treatment costs for patients with WD were lower than previously reported. These findings provide updated real-world insights into the economic burden of WD and highlight the cost implications of medication adherence in managing this rare disorder in the USA.</p>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146257031","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-20DOI: 10.1007/s12325-026-03503-9
Thomas Sejersen, Anne-Berit Ekström, Anna-Karin Kroksmark, Nahila Justo, Michael L Ganz, Charlotte Pettersson, Sophie Graham, Karl Gertow, Sreeram Ramagopalan, Alex Simpson
Introduction: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a rare, progressive, neuromuscular disorder that leads to loss of motor and respiratory function, affecting the individual's ability to work and life expectancy. The magnitude of productivity losses due to medical absenteeism and premature death associated with SMA is unknown. We estimated the productivity losses attributable to SMA in a working age population compared with the general working age population in Sweden.
Methods: This was a population-based, 1:4 matched cohort study of patients with SMA aged ≥ 18 years identified in the Swedish National Patient Registry from 2007 to 2019. Amongst those of working age (18-65 years), morbidity-induced productivity losses compared with a matched-reference cohort were estimated as the difference in the number of workdays lost attributable to SMA, monetised using mean income. Mortality-induced productivity losses were estimated as foregone lifetime earnings due to premature deaths for individuals with SMA compared with matched references, after adjusting for sex, age, and background unemployment.
Results: Overall, 172 adult patients with SMA were identified. Amongst those of working age, their average annual medical absenteeism was 100 days (95% confidence interval 61.5-138.1) higher than that of their references, leading to morbidity-induced productivity losses of €31,638 per patient per year alive whilst of productive age, of which €25,650 was directly attributable to SMA. Average mortality-induced productivity losses due to premature death were €108,253 for men and €87,160 for women with SMA.
Conclusions: Productivity losses due to medical absenteeism and premature mortality place a significant burden on adult patients with SMA of working age and Swedish society.
{"title":"Medical Absenteeism and Premature Death in Spinal Muscular Atrophy in Sweden: A Population-Based Matched Register Study of People of Working Age.","authors":"Thomas Sejersen, Anne-Berit Ekström, Anna-Karin Kroksmark, Nahila Justo, Michael L Ganz, Charlotte Pettersson, Sophie Graham, Karl Gertow, Sreeram Ramagopalan, Alex Simpson","doi":"10.1007/s12325-026-03503-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-026-03503-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a rare, progressive, neuromuscular disorder that leads to loss of motor and respiratory function, affecting the individual's ability to work and life expectancy. The magnitude of productivity losses due to medical absenteeism and premature death associated with SMA is unknown. We estimated the productivity losses attributable to SMA in a working age population compared with the general working age population in Sweden.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a population-based, 1:4 matched cohort study of patients with SMA aged ≥ 18 years identified in the Swedish National Patient Registry from 2007 to 2019. Amongst those of working age (18-65 years), morbidity-induced productivity losses compared with a matched-reference cohort were estimated as the difference in the number of workdays lost attributable to SMA, monetised using mean income. Mortality-induced productivity losses were estimated as foregone lifetime earnings due to premature deaths for individuals with SMA compared with matched references, after adjusting for sex, age, and background unemployment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 172 adult patients with SMA were identified. Amongst those of working age, their average annual medical absenteeism was 100 days (95% confidence interval 61.5-138.1) higher than that of their references, leading to morbidity-induced productivity losses of €31,638 per patient per year alive whilst of productive age, of which €25,650 was directly attributable to SMA. Average mortality-induced productivity losses due to premature death were €108,253 for men and €87,160 for women with SMA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Productivity losses due to medical absenteeism and premature mortality place a significant burden on adult patients with SMA of working age and Swedish society.</p>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146257036","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}