首页 > 最新文献

Advances in Therapy最新文献

英文 中文
Correction to: Real-World Comparative Effectiveness Study in Patients with Asthma Initiating Fluticasone Furoate/Vilanterol or Beclometasone Dipropionate/ Formoterol Fumarate in General Practice in England 更正:在英国普通实践中,哮喘患者开始使用糠酸氟替卡松/维兰特罗或二丙酸倍氯米松/富马酸福莫特罗的实际疗效比较研究。
IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-025-03407-0
Ashley Woodcock, John Blakey, Arnaud Bourdin, Giorgio Walter Canonica, Christian Domingo, Alexander Ford, Rosie Hulme, Theo Tritton, Ines Palomares, Sanchayita Sadhu, Arunangshu Biswas, Manish Verma
{"title":"Correction to: Real-World Comparative Effectiveness Study in Patients with Asthma Initiating Fluticasone Furoate/Vilanterol or Beclometasone Dipropionate/ Formoterol Fumarate in General Practice in England","authors":"Ashley Woodcock, John Blakey, Arnaud Bourdin, Giorgio Walter Canonica, Christian Domingo, Alexander Ford, Rosie Hulme, Theo Tritton, Ines Palomares, Sanchayita Sadhu, Arunangshu Biswas, Manish Verma","doi":"10.1007/s12325-025-03407-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12325-025-03407-0","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":"42 12","pages":"5978 - 5979"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12325-025-03407-0.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145426334","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Real-World Perspectives on Switching Patients with Multiple Sclerosis from Anti-CD20 Therapy to Cladribine Tablets from USA-Based Advanced Practice Providers: A Podcast 从美国高级实践提供者转换多发性硬化症患者从抗cd20治疗到克拉德滨片的现实世界观点:播客。
IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-025-03391-5
Christen F. Kutz, Cortnee Roman

The multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment landscape has expanded over time, becoming increasingly complex with the availability of more advanced high-efficacy therapies (HETs). In this evolving context, shared decision-making (SDM) between healthcare providers (HCPs) and patients is crucial for optimizing treatment and ensuring personalized care. Cladribine tablets (CladT), a highly effective therapy with a well-established safety profile, are approved in the USA for treating adults with relapsing MS, including those aged ≥ 50 years. Globally, more than 89,000 patients have received CladT. HCPs have considered transitioning patients from HETs, such as anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, to CladT. Further research is needed to understand factors influencing the decision to switch from an anti-CD20 therapy to CladT. This podcast explores real-world insights and challenges from USA-based advanced practice providers who have switched patients with MS from anti-CD20 therapies to CladT. The discussion builds on the results from a real-world retrospective survey of 100 HCPs aimed at understanding their rationale for transitioning patients from anti-CD20 therapies (e.g., ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, rituximab, ublituximab) to CladT. The survey also assessed differences in rationale for discontinuing anti-CD20 therapies and switching from anti-CD20 therapies to CladT between patients aged < 50 and ≥ 50 years. Findings revealed that the most common reasons for transitioning from anti-CD20 therapy to CladT included perception of increased efficacy on relapses (55%) and disability progression (54%), while common reasons for discontinuing anti-CD20 therapy included relapses (41%) and continued clinical activity (26%). In patients aged > 50 years, desire to avoid long-term immunosuppression (45%) was a key factor in choosing CladT after anti-CD20 therapy. Notably, AEs suggestive of immunosuppression or opportunistic infections were not reported in patients who transitioned to CladT, and no new safety signals, infections, or immunoglobulin reductions were observed. This podcast also highlights the economic benefits of CladT, the role of SDM, and recommendations based on clinical experiences.

Podcast Transcript (MP4 217843 kb)

随着时间的推移,多发性硬化症(MS)的治疗领域不断扩大,随着更先进的高效疗法(HETs)的出现,治疗变得越来越复杂。在这种不断发展的背景下,医疗保健提供者(HCPs)和患者之间的共享决策(SDM)对于优化治疗和确保个性化护理至关重要。克拉德里滨片(CladT)是一种具有良好安全性的高效疗法,已在美国被批准用于治疗成人复发性多发性硬化症,包括年龄≥50岁的患者。在全球范围内,超过89,000名患者接受了CladT治疗。HCPs已经考虑将患者从het(如抗cd20单克隆抗体)过渡到CladT。需要进一步的研究来了解影响从抗cd20治疗转向CladT治疗的因素。本播客探讨了来自美国高级实践提供者的现实世界的见解和挑战,他们将MS患者从抗cd20治疗转为CladT治疗。讨论建立在对100名HCPs的真实世界回顾性调查结果的基础上,旨在了解他们将患者从抗cd20治疗(例如,ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, rituximab, ublituximab)过渡到CladT的理由。该调查还评估了50岁患者停止抗cd20治疗和从抗cd20治疗转向CladT的理由差异,避免长期免疫抑制的愿望(45%)是抗cd20治疗后选择CladT的关键因素。值得注意的是,在过渡到CladT的患者中未报告提示免疫抑制或机会性感染的ae,也未观察到新的安全信号、感染或免疫球蛋白减少。本播客还强调了CladT的经济效益、SDM的作用以及基于临床经验的建议。播客文字记录(MP4 217843 kb)。
{"title":"Real-World Perspectives on Switching Patients with Multiple Sclerosis from Anti-CD20 Therapy to Cladribine Tablets from USA-Based Advanced Practice Providers: A Podcast","authors":"Christen F. Kutz,&nbsp;Cortnee Roman","doi":"10.1007/s12325-025-03391-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12325-025-03391-5","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment landscape has expanded over time, becoming increasingly complex with the availability of more advanced high-efficacy therapies (HETs). In this evolving context, shared decision-making (SDM) between healthcare providers (HCPs) and patients is crucial for optimizing treatment and ensuring personalized care. Cladribine tablets (CladT), a highly effective therapy with a well-established safety profile, are approved in the USA for treating adults with relapsing MS, including those aged ≥ 50 years. Globally, more than 89,000 patients have received CladT. HCPs have considered transitioning patients from HETs, such as anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, to CladT. Further research is needed to understand factors influencing the decision to switch from an anti-CD20 therapy to CladT. This podcast explores real-world insights and challenges from USA-based advanced practice providers who have switched patients with MS from anti-CD20 therapies to CladT. The discussion builds on the results from a real-world retrospective survey of 100 HCPs aimed at understanding their rationale for transitioning patients from anti-CD20 therapies (e.g., ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, rituximab, ublituximab) to CladT. The survey also assessed differences in rationale for discontinuing anti-CD20 therapies and switching from anti-CD20 therapies to CladT between patients aged &lt; 50 and ≥ 50 years. Findings revealed that the most common reasons for transitioning from anti-CD20 therapy to CladT included perception of increased efficacy on relapses (55%) and disability progression (54%), while common reasons for discontinuing anti-CD20 therapy included relapses (41%) and continued clinical activity (26%). In patients aged &gt; 50 years, desire to avoid long-term immunosuppression (45%) was a key factor in choosing CladT after anti-CD20 therapy. Notably, AEs suggestive of immunosuppression or opportunistic infections were not reported in patients who transitioned to CladT, and no new safety signals, infections, or immunoglobulin reductions were observed. This podcast also highlights the economic benefits of CladT, the role of SDM, and recommendations based on clinical experiences.</p>\u0000<div><div><iframe></iframe></div><div><p>Podcast Transcript (MP4 217843 kb)</p></div></div></div>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":"42 12","pages":"5857 - 5868"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12325-025-03391-5.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145426325","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Response to Letter Regarding: “Biologic Treatment Adherence and Persistence in Patients with Palmoplantar Pustulosis: A Real-World, Claims-Based Study” 关于“掌跖脓疱病患者的生物治疗依从性和持久性:一项真实世界的、基于索赔的研究”的回复。
IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-025-03405-2
Chiara Tognaccini, Leah E. Thomas, Dina Ghanim, Steven R. Feldman, Jashin J. Wu
{"title":"Response to Letter Regarding: “Biologic Treatment Adherence and Persistence in Patients with Palmoplantar Pustulosis: A Real-World, Claims-Based Study”","authors":"Chiara Tognaccini,&nbsp;Leah E. Thomas,&nbsp;Dina Ghanim,&nbsp;Steven R. Feldman,&nbsp;Jashin J. Wu","doi":"10.1007/s12325-025-03405-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12325-025-03405-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":"42 12","pages":"6313 - 6315"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145426330","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Letter to the Editor Regarding “Biologic Treatment Adherence and Persistence in Patients with Palmoplantar Pustulosis: A Real-World, Claims-Based Study” 致编辑关于“掌跖脓疱病患者生物治疗依从性和持久性:一项真实世界的、基于索赔的研究”的信。
IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-025-03404-3
Lu-Ying Wang, Yi-Hang Ding, Xiu-Juan Hou, Chen Li
{"title":"Letter to the Editor Regarding “Biologic Treatment Adherence and Persistence in Patients with Palmoplantar Pustulosis: A Real-World, Claims-Based Study”","authors":"Lu-Ying Wang,&nbsp;Yi-Hang Ding,&nbsp;Xiu-Juan Hou,&nbsp;Chen Li","doi":"10.1007/s12325-025-03404-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12325-025-03404-3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":"42 12","pages":"6310 - 6312"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145426399","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Real-World Persistence in Adults with HIV and Mental Health or Substance Use Disorders After Restarting Antiretroviral Therapy in the United States 在美国,重新开始抗逆转录病毒治疗后,成人艾滋病毒和精神健康或物质使用障碍的现实世界持续性
IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-10-25 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-025-03379-1
Amanda M. Kong, Jacqueline Lucia, Mary J. Christoph, Uche Mordi, Daisha Joseph, Gulce Askin, Daniela Yucuma, Neia Prata Menezes, Peter McMahon, Travis Lim

Introduction

Lifelong antiretroviral therapy (ART) persistence prevents the progression of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-related illnesses and reduces HIV transmission. People with HIV who have a mental health disorder or substance use disorder (PWH-MHD/SUD) often face persistence challenges. This real-world study compared ART persistence among PWH-MHD/SUD who restarted various ART regimens after a treatment interruption.

Methods

This observational, retrospective cohort study analyzed US claims data from the HealthVerity Marketplace from January 2015 through February 2024. PWH aged ≥ 18 years who restarted the same ART regimen they had previously discontinued for > 90 days were included. The population of PWH-MHD/SUD was analyzed. Pairwise comparisons were conducted for those who received bictegravir (B)/emtricitabine (F)/tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) versus dolutegravir (DTG)/lamivudine (3TC), DTG/abacavir (ABC)/3TC, and DTG-based multitablet regimens [MTRs; i.e., DTG + F/TAF or DTG + F/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)]. Baseline characteristics were balanced using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Time to nonpersistence (i.e., ART regimen discontinuation or switching) was depicted using Kaplan–Meier plots. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using weighted Cox proportional hazards models.

Results

Among all the PWH who restarted a previously discontinued ART regimen (n = 20,623), 43.4% had an MHD or SUD. Compared with PWH-MHD/SUD who received B/F/TAF, those receiving DTG/ABC/3TC and DTG-based MTRs were significantly more likely to be nonpersistent [weighted HR (95% CI) 1.18 (1.09–1.29) and 1.19 (1.06–1.34), respectively], while there was no significant difference for those receiving DTG/3TC. Compared with those receiving B/F/TAF, the risk of switching was significantly higher for PWH-MHD/SUD receiving DTG/3TC, DTG/ABC/3TC, or a DTG-based MTR [weighted HR (95% CI) 1.68 (1.08–2.63), 2.67 (2.23–3.19), and 2.88 (2.32–3.58), respectively]. These results were generally consistent among the broader population of restarters.

Conclusion

For PWH-MHD/SUD who restarted ART after a treatment interruption, B/F/TAF was associated with longer persistence and the lowest risk of switch compared with other guideline-recommended therapies.

终生坚持抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)可防止人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)相关疾病的进展并减少HIV传播。患有精神健康障碍或物质使用障碍(PWH-MHD/SUD)的艾滋病毒感染者经常面临持续性挑战。这项现实世界的研究比较了在治疗中断后重新开始各种ART方案的PWH-MHD/SUD患者的ART持久性。方法:这项观察性、回顾性队列研究分析了2015年1月至2024年2月HealthVerity市场上的美国索赔数据。年龄≥18岁的PWH,重新开始他们之前停止的相同抗逆转录病毒治疗方案100 - 90天。分析PWH-MHD/SUD人群。对接受比替重力韦(B)/恩曲他滨(F)/替诺福韦·阿拉法胺(TAF)与多替重力韦(DTG)/拉米夫定(3TC)、DTG/阿巴卡韦(ABC)/3TC和DTG为基础的多片方案进行两两比较;即DTG + F/TAF或DTG + F/富马酸替诺福韦二吡酯(TDF)]。使用治疗加权的逆概率来平衡基线特征。到非持续性的时间(即ART治疗方案停止或切换)用Kaplan-Meier图来描述。使用加权Cox比例风险模型估计风险比(hr)和95%置信区间(ci)。结果:在所有重新开始先前停止的抗逆转录病毒治疗方案的PWH中(n = 20,623), 43.4%发生MHD或SUD。与接受B/F/TAF的PWH-MHD/SUD相比,接受DTG/ABC/3TC和基于DTG的MTRs的患者非持续性的可能性显著增加[加权HR (95% CI)分别为1.18(1.09-1.29)和1.19(1.06-1.34)],而接受DTG/3TC的患者无显著差异。与接受B/F/TAF的PWH-MHD/SUD患者相比,接受DTG/3TC、DTG/ABC/3TC或基于DTG的MTR的PWH-MHD/SUD患者转换的风险明显更高[加权HR (95% CI)分别为1.68(1.08-2.63)、2.67(2.23-3.19)和2.88(2.32-3.58)]。这些结果在更广泛的再起动者群体中普遍一致。结论:对于PWH-MHD/SUD在治疗中断后重新开始抗逆转录病毒治疗,与其他指南推荐的治疗方法相比,B/F/TAF与更长的持续时间和最低的转换风险相关。
{"title":"Real-World Persistence in Adults with HIV and Mental Health or Substance Use Disorders After Restarting Antiretroviral Therapy in the United States","authors":"Amanda M. Kong,&nbsp;Jacqueline Lucia,&nbsp;Mary J. Christoph,&nbsp;Uche Mordi,&nbsp;Daisha Joseph,&nbsp;Gulce Askin,&nbsp;Daniela Yucuma,&nbsp;Neia Prata Menezes,&nbsp;Peter McMahon,&nbsp;Travis Lim","doi":"10.1007/s12325-025-03379-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12325-025-03379-1","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Lifelong antiretroviral therapy (ART) persistence prevents the progression of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-related illnesses and reduces HIV transmission. People with HIV who have a mental health disorder or substance use disorder (PWH-MHD/SUD) often face persistence challenges. This real-world study compared ART persistence among PWH-MHD/SUD who restarted various ART regimens after a treatment interruption.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This observational, retrospective cohort study analyzed US claims data from the HealthVerity Marketplace from January 2015 through February 2024. PWH aged ≥ 18 years who restarted the same ART regimen they had previously discontinued for &gt; 90 days were included. The population of PWH-MHD/SUD was analyzed. Pairwise comparisons were conducted for those who received bictegravir (B)/emtricitabine (F)/tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) versus dolutegravir (DTG)/lamivudine (3TC), DTG/abacavir (ABC)/3TC, and DTG-based multitablet regimens [MTRs; i.e., DTG + F/TAF or DTG + F/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)]. Baseline characteristics were balanced using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Time to nonpersistence (i.e., ART regimen discontinuation or switching) was depicted using Kaplan–Meier plots. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using weighted Cox proportional hazards models.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Among all the PWH who restarted a previously discontinued ART regimen (<i>n</i> = 20,623), 43.4% had an MHD or SUD. Compared with PWH-MHD/SUD who received B/F/TAF, those receiving DTG/ABC/3TC and DTG-based MTRs were significantly more likely to be nonpersistent [weighted HR (95% CI) 1.18 (1.09–1.29) and 1.19 (1.06–1.34), respectively], while there was no significant difference for those receiving DTG/3TC. Compared with those receiving B/F/TAF, the risk of switching was significantly higher for PWH-MHD/SUD receiving DTG/3TC, DTG/ABC/3TC, or a DTG-based MTR [weighted HR (95% CI) 1.68 (1.08–2.63), 2.67 (2.23–3.19), and 2.88 (2.32–3.58), respectively]. These results were generally consistent among the broader population of restarters.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>For PWH-MHD/SUD who restarted ART after a treatment interruption, B/F/TAF was associated with longer persistence and the lowest risk of switch compared with other guideline-recommended therapies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":"42 12","pages":"6261 - 6277"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12325-025-03379-1.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145367348","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Value Contribution of Palopegteriparatide in Adult Patients with Chronic Hypoparathyroidism using Multicriteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) 用多标准决策分析(MCDA)评价帕罗格特肽对成人慢性甲状旁腺功能减退的价值贡献。
IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-10-24 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-025-03396-0
Juan José Díez, Xavier Badia, Reyes Abad, Carmen Alerany, Mónica Climente Martí, Josep Maria Guiu, Isabel Martín, María Caballero, Manuel Muñoz Torres

Introduction

The study objective was to determine the value contribution of palopegteriparatide to the treatment of adults with chronic hypoparathyroidism, a rare endocrine disease, through a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA).

Methods

The Orphar-SEFH group framework for evaluating orphan drugs was used, along with the weighting performed by 98 national and regional evaluators. A multidisciplinary panel of seven experts individually scored the evidence matrix. The scores were collected and analysed using Microsoft Excel software programmed for MCDA study analysis. The results were discussed in a reflective discussion session.

Results

The expert panel considered chronic hypoparathyroidism to be a moderate-to-severe disease (mean ± SD: 3.3 ± 0.5) due to its multiorgan impact and associated comorbidities, with significant unmet needs (3.6 ± 1.0), particularly related to the lack of the physiological effect due to insufficient levels of parathyroid hormone. The experts found palopegteriparatide as an add-on treatment to conventional therapy (calcium and active vitamin D) to be much more effective than placebo plus conventional therapy, with this criterion receiving the highest score. The safety profile was considered acceptable (1.6 ± 1.1). The participants highlighted the positive impact of palopegteriparatide on patient-reported outcomes (2.9 ± 0.9) compared to placebo because of improvements in quality of life (QoL). Palopegteriparatide was seen as a potentially disease-modifying treatment, which could lead to savings in "other medical costs" (3.1 ± 1.1) and "non-medical/indirect costs" (2.0 ± 0.8), although no evidence was available, especially in the long term. The quality of the evidence was perceived as high (3.6 ± 0.5). The overall value contribution of palopegteriparatide was 0.58 (+ 1 = maximum value) compared to placebo. The study has some limitations, including a relatively small panel size and the exclusion of treatment cost as a criterion due to lack of pricing information at the time of evaluation.

Conclusion

According to MCDA, palopegteriparatide represents a valuable therapeutic option for chronic hypoparathyroidism treatment, particularly due to its demonstrated efficacy, which had an impact on patients’ QoL, and the current unmet needs in this therapeutic area.

研究目的是通过多标准决策分析(MCDA)确定palopegteriparatide对治疗成人慢性甲状旁腺功能减退症(一种罕见的内分泌疾病)的价值贡献。方法:采用孤儿- sefh组框架评价孤儿药,并由98个国家和地区评价人员进行加权。一个由七名专家组成的多学科小组对证据矩阵进行了单独评分。使用MCDA研究分析软件Microsoft Excel对评分进行收集和分析。结果在一次反思性讨论会上进行了讨论。结果:专家组认为慢性甲状旁腺功能减退症是一种中重度疾病(平均±SD: 3.3±0.5),由于其多器官影响和相关合并症,具有显著的未满足需求(3.6±1.0),特别是由于甲状旁腺激素水平不足而缺乏生理作用。专家们发现,作为常规治疗(钙和活性维生素D)的附加治疗,palopegteriparatide比安慰剂加常规治疗更有效,在这一标准上获得了最高分。安全性被认为是可接受的(1.6±1.1)。参与者强调,与安慰剂相比,palopegteriparatide对患者报告的结果(2.9±0.9)有积极影响,因为生活质量(QoL)得到改善。Palopegteriparatide被视为一种潜在的疾病改善治疗方法,可以节省“其他医疗费用”(3.1±1.1)和“非医疗/间接费用”(2.0±0.8),尽管没有证据,特别是从长期来看。证据质量为高(3.6±0.5)。与安慰剂相比,palopegteriparatide的总体价值贡献为0.58(+ 1 =最大值)。该研究有一些局限性,包括相对较小的小组规模以及由于评估时缺乏定价信息而将治疗费用作为标准排除在外。结论:根据MCDA, palopegteriparatide是慢性甲状旁腺功能减退症治疗的一种有价值的治疗选择,特别是由于其已证实的疗效,对患者的生活质量产生了影响,以及目前该治疗领域未满足的需求。
{"title":"Value Contribution of Palopegteriparatide in Adult Patients with Chronic Hypoparathyroidism using Multicriteria Decision Analysis (MCDA)","authors":"Juan José Díez,&nbsp;Xavier Badia,&nbsp;Reyes Abad,&nbsp;Carmen Alerany,&nbsp;Mónica Climente Martí,&nbsp;Josep Maria Guiu,&nbsp;Isabel Martín,&nbsp;María Caballero,&nbsp;Manuel Muñoz Torres","doi":"10.1007/s12325-025-03396-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12325-025-03396-0","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The study objective was to determine the value contribution of palopegteriparatide to the treatment of adults with chronic hypoparathyroidism, a rare endocrine disease, through a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA).</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>The Orphar-SEFH group framework for evaluating orphan drugs was used, along with the weighting performed by 98 national and regional evaluators. A multidisciplinary panel of seven experts individually scored the evidence matrix. The scores were collected and analysed using Microsoft Excel software programmed for MCDA study analysis. The results were discussed in a reflective discussion session.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The expert panel considered chronic hypoparathyroidism to be a moderate-to-severe disease (mean ± SD: 3.3 ± 0.5) due to its multiorgan impact and associated comorbidities, with significant unmet needs (3.6 ± 1.0), particularly related to the lack of the physiological effect due to insufficient levels of parathyroid hormone. The experts found palopegteriparatide as an add-on treatment to conventional therapy (calcium and active vitamin D) to be much more effective than placebo plus conventional therapy, with this criterion receiving the highest score. The safety profile was considered acceptable (1.6 ± 1.1). The participants highlighted the positive impact of palopegteriparatide on patient-reported outcomes (2.9 ± 0.9) compared to placebo because of improvements in quality of life (QoL). Palopegteriparatide was seen as a potentially disease-modifying treatment, which could lead to savings in \"other medical costs\" (3.1 ± 1.1) and \"non-medical/indirect costs\" (2.0 ± 0.8), although no evidence was available, especially in the long term. The quality of the evidence was perceived as high (3.6 ± 0.5). The overall value contribution of palopegteriparatide was 0.58 (+ 1 = maximum value) compared to placebo. The study has some limitations, including a relatively small panel size and the exclusion of treatment cost as a criterion due to lack of pricing information at the time of evaluation.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>According to MCDA, palopegteriparatide represents a valuable therapeutic option for chronic hypoparathyroidism treatment, particularly due to its demonstrated efficacy, which had an impact on patients’ QoL, and the current unmet needs in this therapeutic area.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":"42 12","pages":"6234 - 6247"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12325-025-03396-0.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145353407","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Visualizing Improvements in Airway Dysfunction After Inhaled Therapy in Patients With Uncontrolled Asthma: A Narrative Review 未控制哮喘患者吸入治疗后气道功能障碍的可视化改善:一项叙述性综述。
IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-10-24 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-025-03392-4
Sam Tcherner, Ali Mozaffaripour, Cory Yamashita, Grace Parraga

Clinical trials investigating asthma therapies typically rely on pulmonary function tests including spirometry markers, such as forced expiratory volume in 1 s, to evaluate efficacy. While these measures provide insights into the action of bronchodilators on global lung function, their specific effects on the airways and the relationship between clinical improvements and airway dysfunction remains poorly understood. In recent years, pulmonary functional imaging methods, such as hyperpolarized 129Xe magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), have enabled the analysis of airway dysfunction in patients with asthma utilizing ventilation defect percent (VDP). In this narrative review, we summarize clinical evidence about the impact of inhaled bronchodilator therapies on airway dysfunction in patients with asthma, focusing on studies that utilized 129Xe MRI to visualize and quantify MRI VDP. 129Xe MRI VDP has been shown to be a well-tolerated and sensitive technique for enabling the visualization and quantification of airway functional changes over time in patients with asthma. This has been shown not only in a controlled clinical trial environment but also in a real-world setting, in patients with both controlled and poorly controlled asthma. A recent study evaluating single-inhaler triple therapy in patients with uncontrolled moderate–severe asthma, despite inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist maintenance therapy, demonstrated that daily fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 µg) led to significantly improved 129Xe MRI VDP after only 6 weeks, which was in line with broader central/distal airway function and quality of life improvements. These results highlight the capacity of 129Xe MRI VDP to detect early responses to treatment. In addition, the mechanistic insights provided by 129Xe MRI VDP also indicated that these benefits are likely due to the combination of UMEC (a long-acting muscarinic antagonist) and an efficacious inhaled corticosteroid, addressing undertreated inflammatory bronchoconstriction, helping to restore airway caliber and function that more closely resemble the airways of a healthy individual.

Videos available for this article.

研究哮喘治疗的临床试验通常依赖于肺功能测试,包括肺活量测定指标,如1秒内的用力呼气量,来评估疗效。虽然这些措施提供了支气管扩张剂对整体肺功能的作用的见解,但它们对气道的具体影响以及临床改善与气道功能障碍之间的关系仍然知之甚少。近年来,肺功能成像方法,如超极化129Xe磁共振成像(MRI),可以利用通气缺陷百分比(VDP)分析哮喘患者的气道功能障碍。在这篇叙述性综述中,我们总结了吸入支气管扩张剂治疗对哮喘患者气道功能障碍影响的临床证据,重点是利用129Xe MRI可视化和量化MRI VDP的研究。MRI VDP已被证明是一种耐受性良好且敏感的技术,可对哮喘患者气道功能随时间的变化进行可视化和量化。这不仅在受控的临床试验环境中得到了证明,而且在现实环境中,在哮喘控制和控制不良的患者中也得到了证明。最近的一项研究评估了不受控制的中重度哮喘患者的单吸入器三联疗法,尽管吸入皮质类固醇/长效β2激动剂维持治疗,但表明每日糠酸氟替卡松/乌莫替尼/维兰特罗(FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25µg)可在仅6周后显著改善129Xe MRI VDP,这与更广泛的中枢/远端气道功能和生活质量改善一致。这些结果突出了129Xe MRI VDP检测早期治疗反应的能力。此外,129Xe MRI VDP提供的机制见解也表明,这些益处可能是由于UMEC(长效毒菌碱拮抗剂)和有效的吸入皮质类固醇的结合,解决治疗不足的炎症性支气管收缩,帮助恢复气道的直径和功能,更接近于健康个体的气道。本文提供的视频。
{"title":"Visualizing Improvements in Airway Dysfunction After Inhaled Therapy in Patients With Uncontrolled Asthma: A Narrative Review","authors":"Sam Tcherner,&nbsp;Ali Mozaffaripour,&nbsp;Cory Yamashita,&nbsp;Grace Parraga","doi":"10.1007/s12325-025-03392-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12325-025-03392-4","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Clinical trials investigating asthma therapies typically rely on pulmonary function tests including spirometry markers, such as forced expiratory volume in 1 s, to evaluate efficacy. While these measures provide insights into the action of bronchodilators on global lung function, their specific effects on the airways and the relationship between clinical improvements and airway dysfunction remains poorly understood. In recent years, pulmonary functional imaging methods, such as hyperpolarized <sup>129</sup>Xe magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), have enabled the analysis of airway dysfunction in patients with asthma utilizing ventilation defect percent (VDP). In this narrative review, we summarize clinical evidence about the impact of inhaled bronchodilator therapies on airway dysfunction in patients with asthma, focusing on studies that utilized <sup>129</sup>Xe MRI to visualize and quantify MRI VDP. <sup>129</sup>Xe MRI VDP has been shown to be a well-tolerated and sensitive technique for enabling the visualization and quantification of airway functional changes over time in patients with asthma. This has been shown not only in a controlled clinical trial environment but also in a real-world setting, in patients with both controlled and poorly controlled asthma. A recent study evaluating single-inhaler triple therapy in patients with uncontrolled moderate–severe asthma, despite inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β<sub>2</sub>-agonist maintenance therapy, demonstrated that daily fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 µg) led to significantly improved <sup>129</sup>Xe MRI VDP after only 6 weeks, which was in line with broader central/distal airway function and quality of life improvements. These results highlight the capacity of <sup>129</sup>Xe MRI VDP to detect early responses to treatment. In addition, the mechanistic insights provided by <sup>129</sup>Xe MRI VDP also indicated that these benefits are likely due to the combination of UMEC (a long-acting muscarinic antagonist) and an efficacious inhaled corticosteroid, addressing undertreated inflammatory bronchoconstriction, helping to restore airway caliber and function that more closely resemble the airways of a healthy individual.</p><p>Videos available for this article.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":"42 12","pages":"5950 - 5959"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12325-025-03392-4.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145353396","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Efficacy and Safety of 48-Week Low-Dose Dienogest Treatment in Patients with Endometriosis-Associated Dysmenorrhea: A Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Group Trial 48周低剂量Dienogest治疗子宫内膜异位症相关痛经患者的疗效和安全性:一项随机、开放标签、平行组试验
IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-10-24 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-025-03397-z
Kyoko Kikuno, Ryuta Asada, Takuma Ishihara, Ken-ichirou Morishige, Kenro Chikazawa, Tatsuro Furui, Masanori Isobe

Introduction

Dienogest (DNG) is widely used to manage endometriosis-associated pain; however, long-term data comparing low and standard doses are limited. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 48-week DNG treatment (1 mg/day vs. 2 mg/day) in patients with endometriosis-related dysmenorrhea (composite score).

Methods

In this randomized, open-label, parallel-group, trial, 88 patients with endometriosis were enrolled, all of whom had at least one ovarian endometriotic cyst confirmed by imaging. Other phenotypes of endometriosis, such as deep infiltrating or peritoneal lesions, were not systematically assessed and may have been present. Patients were randomized to receive either 1-mg/day or 2-mg/day DNG. The primary endpoint was the change in menstrual pain measured using a visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary endpoints included changes in the dysmenorrhea score, ovarian endometrioma volume, serum estradiol levels, bone mineral density (BMD), and menopausal symptoms.

Results

Both groups demonstrated a significant reduction in menstrual pain (VAS). The mean VAS scores decreased by 44.63 and 54.19 mm in the 1-mg and 2-mg groups, respectively. However, the between-group difference (– 9.57 mm; 95% confidence interval: − 22.7 to 3.56) was not above the predefined non-inferiority margin of – 15 mm; thus, non-inferiority of the 1-mg dose could not be confirmed. Improvements in dysmenorrhea scores and endometrioma volume were also observed in both groups, although greater effects were noted in the 2-mg group than in the 1-mg group. Serum estradiol suppression was comparable between the groups, whereas BMD loss was less pronounced in the 1-mg group than in the 2-mg group.

Conclusions

This study did not demonstrate statistical non-inferiority of 1-mg/day DNG treatment over 2-mg/day DNG treatment for pain relief. These results suggest that the 2-mg/day dose may offer more robust analgesic effects, particularly during the early treatment phase. However, 1-mg/day DNG still showed meaningful symptom improvement with fewer adverse events than 2-mg/day DNG, supporting its potential use in selected patients requiring long-term therapy.

Trial Registration Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, trial registration number: jRCTs041210016.

Dienogest (DNG)被广泛用于治疗子宫内膜异位症相关疼痛;然而,比较低剂量和标准剂量的长期数据有限。因此,本研究旨在评估48周DNG治疗(1mg /天vs. 2mg /天)对子宫内膜异位症相关痛经患者的疗效和安全性(综合评分)。方法:在这项随机、开放标签、平行组的试验中,88例子宫内膜异位症患者入组,所有患者均至少有一个卵巢子宫内膜异位症囊肿。其他表型的子宫内膜异位症,如深浸润或腹膜病变,没有系统的评估,可能已经存在。患者随机接受1毫克/天或2毫克/天的DNG治疗。主要终点是使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量月经疼痛的变化。次要终点包括痛经评分、卵巢子宫内膜瘤体积、血清雌二醇水平、骨密度(BMD)和更年期症状的变化。结果:两组患者经期疼痛(VAS)均明显减轻。1 mg和2 mg组VAS平均评分分别下降44.63 和54.19 mm。然而,组间差异(- 9.57 mm; 95%置信区间:- 22.7至3.56)未超过预定的- 15 mm的非劣效性界限;因此,不能证实1mg剂量的非劣效性。两组患者的痛经评分和子宫内膜瘤体积均有改善,但2毫克组的效果明显高于1毫克组。血清雌二醇抑制在两组之间具有可比性,而BMD损失在1 mg组比2 mg组更不明显。结论:该研究没有证明1 mg/天DNG治疗比2 mg/天DNG治疗在缓解疼痛方面具有统计学上的非劣效性。这些结果表明,2毫克/天的剂量可能提供更强大的镇痛效果,特别是在早期治疗阶段。然而,与2 mg/d DNG相比,1 mg/d DNG仍然显示出有意义的症状改善,不良事件较少,支持其在需要长期治疗的特定患者中的潜在应用。日本临床试验注册中心,试验注册号:jRCTs041210016。
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of 48-Week Low-Dose Dienogest Treatment in Patients with Endometriosis-Associated Dysmenorrhea: A Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Group Trial","authors":"Kyoko Kikuno,&nbsp;Ryuta Asada,&nbsp;Takuma Ishihara,&nbsp;Ken-ichirou Morishige,&nbsp;Kenro Chikazawa,&nbsp;Tatsuro Furui,&nbsp;Masanori Isobe","doi":"10.1007/s12325-025-03397-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12325-025-03397-z","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Dienogest (DNG) is widely used to manage endometriosis-associated pain; however, long-term data comparing low and standard doses are limited. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 48-week DNG treatment (1 mg/day vs. 2 mg/day) in patients with endometriosis-related dysmenorrhea (composite score).</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this randomized, open-label, parallel-group, trial, 88 patients with endometriosis were enrolled, all of whom had at least one ovarian endometriotic cyst confirmed by imaging. Other phenotypes of endometriosis, such as deep infiltrating or peritoneal lesions, were not systematically assessed and may have been present. Patients were randomized to receive either 1-mg/day or 2-mg/day DNG. The primary endpoint was the change in menstrual pain measured using a visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary endpoints included changes in the dysmenorrhea score, ovarian endometrioma volume, serum estradiol levels, bone mineral density (BMD), and menopausal symptoms.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Both groups demonstrated a significant reduction in menstrual pain (VAS). The mean VAS scores decreased by 44.63 and 54.19 mm in the 1-mg and 2-mg groups, respectively. However, the between-group difference (– 9.57 mm; 95% confidence interval: − 22.7 to 3.56) was not above the predefined non-inferiority margin of – 15 mm; thus, non-inferiority of the 1-mg dose could not be confirmed. Improvements in dysmenorrhea scores and endometrioma volume were also observed in both groups, although greater effects were noted in the 2-mg group than in the 1-mg group. Serum estradiol suppression was comparable between the groups, whereas BMD loss was less pronounced in the 1-mg group than in the 2-mg group.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study did not demonstrate statistical non-inferiority of 1-mg/day DNG treatment over 2-mg/day DNG treatment for pain relief. These results suggest that the 2-mg/day dose may offer more robust analgesic effects, particularly during the early treatment phase. However, 1-mg/day DNG still showed meaningful symptom improvement with fewer adverse events than 2-mg/day DNG, supporting its potential use in selected patients requiring long-term therapy.</p><p><b>Trial Registration</b> Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, trial registration number: jRCTs041210016.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":"42 12","pages":"6248 - 6260"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12325-025-03397-z.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145353338","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mental Health Experiences and Challenges Among Individuals with Myasthenia Gravis: Insights from Patient-Centered, Qualitative Analyses 重症肌无力患者的心理健康经历和挑战:来自以患者为中心的定性分析的见解。
IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-10-22 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-025-03399-x
Rachelle D. Rodriguez, Ashley E. L. Anderson, Kelly G. Gwathmey, Caroline R. Brethenoux, Lisa M. Shea, Raghav Govindarajan, Nizar Souayah, Wesley D. Peters, Louis A. Jackson, Zia U. Choudhry

Introduction

Historically, anxiety and depression rates have been higher among individuals with myasthenia gravis (MG) than the general population, and self-reported sentiments and experiences of mental health impairment may be more common than formal diagnoses. Patient-centered research can provide insight into self-described anxiety and depressive symptoms and stressors experienced by those with MG in the United States (US) and improve understanding of the current prevalence of anxiety and depression.

Methods

Insights were collected from three sources. First, a literature review of quantitative and/or real-world studies of anxiety/depression among individuals with gMG in the US. Second, a secondary, qualitative analysis of the transcripts from focus groups conducted with 12 individuals with self-reported generalized MG. Third, analysis of thousands of online conversations between people with self-reported ocular or generalized MG using search, data extraction, and artificial intelligence-powered algorithms. No statistical analyses were performed.

Results

The literature review identified three studies (precluding a meta-analysis): prevalence estimates for depression were 19% (diagnosed), 31% (receiving antidepressants), and 75% (self-reported sentiments), and for anxiety were 17%, 19% (both diagnosed), and 82% (self-reported sentiments). Unique stressors and triggers were identified, classified into four categories: experience of symptoms/uncontrolled symptoms; burden of medical care; daily life functioning, responsibilities, and aspirations; and social support needs. The relative prominence of each stressor and its induced emotion varied by stage in the disease journey: fear and anxiety were discussed more frequently prior to MG diagnosis, whereas hopelessness and depression became more prominent later, during ongoing disease monitoring and management. Patients felt that stress worsened symptoms in a positive feedback loop.

Conclusion

This qualitative, hypothesis-generating study found that individuals with MG in the US were more likely to report experiencing anxiety and depression than the general population due, at least in part, to their MG-specific disease journey and the uncontrolled symptoms experienced.

从历史上看,重症肌无力(MG)患者的焦虑和抑郁率高于一般人群,自我报告的心理健康损害的情绪和经历可能比正式诊断更常见。以患者为中心的研究可以深入了解美国MG患者自我描述的焦虑和抑郁症状以及所经历的压力源,并提高对当前焦虑和抑郁患病率的理解。方法:从三个方面收集见解。首先,对美国gMG患者焦虑/抑郁的定量和/或现实世界研究的文献综述。其次,对12名自我报告的广泛性MG患者进行焦点小组的记录进行二次定性分析。第三,使用搜索、数据提取和人工智能驱动的算法,对自述患有眼性或广义性MG的人之间的数千次在线对话进行分析。未进行统计学分析。结果:文献回顾确定了三项研究(排除了荟萃分析):抑郁症的患病率估计为19%(诊断)、31%(接受抗抑郁药)和75%(自我报告的情绪),焦虑的患病率估计为17%、19%(诊断)和82%(自我报告的情绪)。确定了独特的应激源和触发因素,并将其分为四类:症状经历/不受控制的症状;医疗负担;日常生活功能、责任和愿望;以及社会支持需求。每个压力源及其诱发情绪的相对重要性在疾病发展的不同阶段有所不同:恐惧和焦虑在MG诊断之前被讨论得更频繁,而绝望和抑郁在随后的疾病监测和管理过程中变得更突出。患者认为压力在一个正反馈循环中恶化了症状。结论:这项定性的、产生假设的研究发现,在美国,MG患者比一般人群更有可能报告焦虑和抑郁,至少部分原因是他们的MG特异性疾病历程和所经历的不受控制的症状。
{"title":"Mental Health Experiences and Challenges Among Individuals with Myasthenia Gravis: Insights from Patient-Centered, Qualitative Analyses","authors":"Rachelle D. Rodriguez,&nbsp;Ashley E. L. Anderson,&nbsp;Kelly G. Gwathmey,&nbsp;Caroline R. Brethenoux,&nbsp;Lisa M. Shea,&nbsp;Raghav Govindarajan,&nbsp;Nizar Souayah,&nbsp;Wesley D. Peters,&nbsp;Louis A. Jackson,&nbsp;Zia U. Choudhry","doi":"10.1007/s12325-025-03399-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12325-025-03399-x","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Historically, anxiety and depression rates have been higher among individuals with myasthenia gravis (MG) than the general population, and self-reported sentiments and experiences of mental health impairment may be more common than formal diagnoses. Patient-centered research can provide insight into self-described anxiety and depressive symptoms and stressors experienced by those with MG in the United States (US) and improve understanding of the current prevalence of anxiety and depression.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Insights were collected from three sources. First, a literature review of quantitative and/or real-world studies of anxiety/depression among individuals with gMG in the US. Second, a secondary, qualitative analysis of the transcripts from focus groups conducted with 12 individuals with self-reported generalized MG. Third, analysis of thousands of online conversations between people with self-reported ocular or generalized MG using search, data extraction, and artificial intelligence-powered algorithms. No statistical analyses were performed.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The literature review identified three studies (precluding a meta-analysis): prevalence estimates for depression were 19% (diagnosed), 31% (receiving antidepressants), and 75% (self-reported sentiments), and for anxiety were 17%, 19% (both diagnosed), and 82% (self-reported sentiments). Unique stressors and triggers were identified, classified into four categories: experience of symptoms/uncontrolled symptoms; burden of medical care; daily life functioning, responsibilities, and aspirations; and social support needs. The relative prominence of each stressor and its induced emotion varied by stage in the disease journey: fear and anxiety were discussed more frequently prior to MG diagnosis, whereas hopelessness and depression became more prominent later, during ongoing disease monitoring and management. Patients felt that stress worsened symptoms in a positive feedback loop.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This qualitative, hypothesis-generating study found that individuals with MG in the US were more likely to report experiencing anxiety and depression than the general population due, at least in part, to their MG-specific disease journey and the uncontrolled symptoms experienced.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":"42 12","pages":"6209 - 6233"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12325-025-03399-x.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145342583","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cost-Consequences of Adding Gliclazide Modified Release to Metformin in Patients with Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes in the United Arab Emirates 在阿拉伯联合酋长国,未控制的2型糖尿病患者在二甲双胍中加入格列齐特改良释放的成本-后果
IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-10-21 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-025-03334-0
Mohamed Farghaly, Olivier Cristeau, Fatheya A. L. Awadi, Sara Al Dallal

Introduction

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a chronic metabolic disease that is highly prevalent in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). This study aimed to assess the cost-consequences of adding gliclazide modified release (MR) to metformin in patients with inadequate glycaemic control on metformin alone and of switching patients currently receiving a combination of sitagliptin and metformin to a combination of gliclazide MR and metformin.

Methods

We developed a cost-consequences decision-tree model comparing gliclazide MR and sitagliptin as second-line add-ons to metformin. Based on 2014–2023 Dubai Real World Claims Database data, the model estimated health outcomes (number of patients reaching HbA1c targets of < 7% and ≤ 6.5% and cardiovascular [CV] events, i.e. myocardial infarction [MI] and hospitalisation for heart failure [HHF]), resource use (inpatient, emergency room, and outpatient visits, and hospital bed days), and costs (drug acquisition and medical costs) associated with the two therapies over a 1-year time horizon from the payer perspective.

Results

Adding gliclazide MR to metformin in a cohort of 126,074 patients with inadequate glycaemic control on metformin alone was estimated to result in 535 CV events and 35 deaths avoided per year at a cost of USD 12,250 per CV event avoided or USD 189,415 per death avoided. Switching patients currently treated with sitagliptin as an add-on to metformin to gliclazide MR was estimated to avert 26 cardiovascular events (5 MI and 21 HHF) and 2 deaths per year while providing annual savings of USD 5.11 million, including USD 4.77 million in drug acquisition costs and USD 330,837 in medical costs.

Conclusion

Initiating gliclazide MR as an add-on treatment to metformin could help to reduce the clinical and economic burden of poorly controlled T2D among patients in the UAE. Switching patients from sitagliptin to gliclazide MR as a second-line treatment option could generate substantial cost savings.

2型糖尿病(T2D)是一种慢性代谢性疾病,在阿拉伯联合酋长国(UAE)非常普遍。本研究旨在评估在单用二甲双胍控制血糖不足的患者中加入格列齐特改良释放(MR)的成本-后果,以及将目前接受西格列汀和二甲双胍联合治疗的患者转换为格列齐特MR和二甲双胍联合治疗的成本-后果。方法:我们建立了一个成本-后果决策树模型,比较格列齐特MR和西格列汀作为二甲双胍的二线附加治疗。基于2014-2023年迪拜真实世界索赔数据库的数据,该模型估计了健康结果(达到HbA1c目标的患者数量)结果:在126,074例单用二甲双胍血糖控制不充分的患者中,将格列脲MR加入二甲双胍,估计每年可避免535例CV事件和35例死亡,避免每例CV事件的成本为12,250美元,避免每例死亡的成本为189,415美元。据估计,将目前使用西格列汀作为二甲双胍附加治疗的患者转换为格列齐特MR,每年可避免26例心血管事件(5例心肌梗死和21例心力衰竭)和2例死亡,同时每年可节省511万美元,其中包括477万美元的药物采购成本和330,837美元的医疗费用。结论:启动格列齐特MR作为二甲双胍的附加治疗有助于减轻阿联酋患者控制不良的T2D的临床和经济负担。将患者从西格列汀转为格列齐特MR作为二线治疗选择可以节省大量成本。
{"title":"Cost-Consequences of Adding Gliclazide Modified Release to Metformin in Patients with Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes in the United Arab Emirates","authors":"Mohamed Farghaly,&nbsp;Olivier Cristeau,&nbsp;Fatheya A. L. Awadi,&nbsp;Sara Al Dallal","doi":"10.1007/s12325-025-03334-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12325-025-03334-0","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a chronic metabolic disease that is highly prevalent in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). This study aimed to assess the cost-consequences of adding gliclazide modified release (MR) to metformin in patients with inadequate glycaemic control on metformin alone and of switching patients currently receiving a combination of sitagliptin and metformin to a combination of gliclazide MR and metformin.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>We developed a cost-consequences decision-tree model comparing gliclazide MR and sitagliptin as second-line add-ons to metformin. Based on 2014–2023 Dubai Real World Claims Database data, the model estimated health outcomes (number of patients reaching HbA<sub>1c</sub> targets of &lt; 7% and ≤ 6.5% and cardiovascular [CV] events, i.e. myocardial infarction [MI] and hospitalisation for heart failure [HHF]), resource use (inpatient, emergency room, and outpatient visits, and hospital bed days), and costs (drug acquisition and medical costs) associated with the two therapies over a 1-year time horizon from the payer perspective.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Adding gliclazide MR to metformin in a cohort of 126,074 patients with inadequate glycaemic control on metformin alone was estimated to result in 535 CV events and 35 deaths avoided per year at a cost of USD 12,250 per CV event avoided or USD 189,415 per death avoided. Switching patients currently treated with sitagliptin as an add-on to metformin to gliclazide MR was estimated to avert 26 cardiovascular events (5 MI and 21 HHF) and 2 deaths per year while providing annual savings of USD 5.11 million, including USD 4.77 million in drug acquisition costs and USD 330,837 in medical costs.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Initiating gliclazide MR as an add-on treatment to metformin could help to reduce the clinical and economic burden of poorly controlled T2D among patients in the UAE. Switching patients from sitagliptin to gliclazide MR as a second-line treatment option could generate substantial cost savings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":"42 12","pages":"6190 - 6208"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145336231","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Advances in Therapy
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1