首页 > 最新文献

Surgery in practice and science最新文献

英文 中文
Evaluation of racial/ethnic disparities in surgical outcomes after rectal cancer resection: An ACS-NSQIP analysis 评估直肠癌切除术后手术效果的种族/民族差异:ACS-NSQIP 分析
Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-04-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100248
Carolina Vigna, Ana Sofia Ore, Anne Fabrizio, Evangelos Messaris

Background

Disparities exist the management of rectal cancer. We sought to evaluate short-term surgical outcomes among different racial/ethnic groups following rectal cancer resection.

Materials and Methods

National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database (2016–2019) was queried. Patients undergoing rectal cancer resection were categorized by race/ethnicity. Circumferential resection margin positivity rate and postoperative outcomes were evaluated. 1:1 Propensity score matching (PSM) was used.

Results

Of 1,753 patients, 80.2 % were White, 7.6 % Black, 8.5 % Asian and 3.7 % Hispanic. On unadjusted analysis, Hispanic patients presented longer operative time(p = 0.029), and Black patients higher postoperative ileus(p = 0.003) and readmission(p = 0.023) rates. After PSM, Hispanics had a significantly higher circumferential resection margin positivity rate(p = 0.032), Black patients higher postoperative ileus rate(p = 0.014) and longer LOS(p = 0.0118) when compared to White counterparts.

Conclusion

Racial disparities were found in short-term postoperative outcomes. Hispanic patients presented higher margin positivity rate and Black patients worst 30-day postoperative outcomes. Comparative studies evaluating trends and a higher number of minority patients included in databases are warranted.

背景直肠癌的治疗存在差异。我们试图评估不同种族/族裔群体在直肠癌切除术后的短期手术效果。材料与方法查询了国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP)数据库(2016-2019 年)。按种族/民族对接受直肠癌切除术的患者进行分类。对环形切除边缘阳性率和术后结果进行了评估。结果 在1753名患者中,白人占80.2%,黑人占7.6%,亚裔占8.5%,西班牙裔占3.7%。在未经调整的分析中,西班牙裔患者的手术时间更长(p = 0.029),黑人患者的术后回肠梗阻(p = 0.003)和再入院(p = 0.023)率更高。在 PSM 术后,与白人患者相比,西班牙裔患者的周缘切除边缘阳性率明显更高(p = 0.032),黑人患者的术后回肠率更高(p = 0.014),住院时间更长(p = 0.0118)。西班牙裔患者的边缘阳性率较高,黑人患者的术后 30 天预后最差。有必要进行比较研究,评估趋势并将更多的少数族裔患者纳入数据库。
{"title":"Evaluation of racial/ethnic disparities in surgical outcomes after rectal cancer resection: An ACS-NSQIP analysis","authors":"Carolina Vigna,&nbsp;Ana Sofia Ore,&nbsp;Anne Fabrizio,&nbsp;Evangelos Messaris","doi":"10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100248","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100248","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Disparities exist the management of rectal cancer. We sought to evaluate short-term surgical outcomes among different racial/ethnic groups following rectal cancer resection.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database (2016–2019) was queried. Patients undergoing rectal cancer resection were categorized by race/ethnicity. Circumferential resection margin positivity rate and postoperative outcomes were evaluated. 1:1 Propensity score matching (PSM) was used.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 1,753 patients, 80.2 % were White, 7.6 % Black, 8.5 % Asian and 3.7 % Hispanic. On unadjusted analysis, Hispanic patients presented longer operative time(<em>p</em> = 0.029), and Black patients higher postoperative ileus(<em>p</em> = 0.003) and readmission(<em>p</em> = 0.023) rates. After PSM, Hispanics had a significantly higher circumferential resection margin positivity rate(<em>p</em> = 0.032), Black patients higher postoperative ileus rate(<em>p</em> = 0.014) and longer LOS(<em>p</em> = 0.0118) when compared to White counterparts.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Racial disparities were found in short-term postoperative outcomes. Hispanic patients presented higher margin positivity rate and Black patients worst 30-day postoperative outcomes. Comparative studies evaluating trends and a higher number of minority patients included in databases are warranted.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74890,"journal":{"name":"Surgery in practice and science","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100248"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262024000159/pdfft?md5=b8c6b9dcb291130b1c29412c364bcf2f&pid=1-s2.0-S2666262024000159-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140620922","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The pulmonary contusion score: Development of a simple scoring system for blunt lung injury 肺挫伤评分:开发钝性肺损伤的简易评分系统
Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-04-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100247
Lisa J. Toelle , Allison G. McNickle , Declan Feery , Salman Mohammed , Paul J. Chestovich , Kavita Batra , Douglas R. Fraser

Background

Pulmonary contusions (PC) are common after blunt chest trauma and can be identified with computed tomography (CT). Complex scoring systems for grading PC exist, however recent scoring systems rely on computer-generated algorithms that are not readily available at all hospitals. We developed a scoring system for grading PC to predict the need for prolonged mechanical ventilation and initial hospital admission location.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed of adult blunt trauma patients with PC identified on initial chest CT during 2020. Data elements related to demographics, injury characteristics, disposition and healthcare utilization were extracted. The primary outcome was the need for mechanical ventilation for greater than 48 h. A novel scoring system, the Pulmonary Contusion Score (PCS) was developed. The maximum score was 10, with each lobe contributing up to 2 points. A score of 0 was given for no contusion present in the lobe, 1 for less than 50 % contusion, and 2 for greater than 50 % contusion. A PCS of 4 was hypothesized to correlate with need for mechanical ventilation for over 48 h. A confusion matrix of the scoring algorithm was created, and inter-rater concordance was calculated from a randomly selected 125 patients.

Results

A total of 217 patients were identified. 118 patients (54 %) were admitted to the ICU, but only 23 patients (19 %) were intubated, and only 17 patients (8 %) required mechanical ventilation > 48 h. Sensitivity of the scoring system was 20 %, while specificity was 93 %. Negative predictive value was 93 %. Inter-rater agreement was 77 %.

Conclusion

The PCS is a scoring system with high specificity and negative predictive value that can be used to evaluate the need for mechanical ventilation after sustaining blunt PC and can help properly allocate hospital resources.

Level of evidence

IV - diagnostic criteria

背景肺挫伤(PC)是钝性胸部创伤后的常见病,可通过计算机断层扫描(CT)确定。目前已有复杂的PC分级评分系统,但最新的评分系统依赖于计算机生成的算法,并非所有医院都能使用。我们开发了一套用于对 PC 进行分级的评分系统,以预测对长期机械通气的需求和最初的入院位置。方法我们对 2020 年期间在最初的胸部 CT 中发现 PC 的成人钝性创伤患者进行了回顾性审查。提取了与人口统计学、损伤特征、处置和医疗保健利用相关的数据元素。主要结果是需要机械通气超过 48 小时。最高分为 10 分,每个肺叶最多得 2 分。肺叶无挫伤得 0 分,肺叶挫伤少于 50% 得 1 分,肺叶挫伤大于 50% 得 2 分。根据假设,PCS 达到 4 分将与需要机械通气超过 48 小时相关。评分系统的灵敏度为 20%,特异度为 93%,阴性预测值为 93%。阴性预测值为 93%。结论 PCS 是一种具有高度特异性和阴性预测值的评分系统,可用于评估钝性 PC 受伤后是否需要机械通气,并有助于合理分配医院资源。
{"title":"The pulmonary contusion score: Development of a simple scoring system for blunt lung injury","authors":"Lisa J. Toelle ,&nbsp;Allison G. McNickle ,&nbsp;Declan Feery ,&nbsp;Salman Mohammed ,&nbsp;Paul J. Chestovich ,&nbsp;Kavita Batra ,&nbsp;Douglas R. Fraser","doi":"10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100247","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100247","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Pulmonary contusions (PC) are common after blunt chest trauma and can be identified with computed tomography (CT). Complex scoring systems for grading PC exist, however recent scoring systems rely on computer-generated algorithms that are not readily available at all hospitals. We developed a scoring system for grading PC to predict the need for prolonged mechanical ventilation and initial hospital admission location.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective review was performed of adult blunt trauma patients with PC identified on initial chest CT during 2020. Data elements related to demographics, injury characteristics, disposition and healthcare utilization were extracted. The primary outcome was the need for mechanical ventilation for greater than 48 h. A novel scoring system, the Pulmonary Contusion Score (PCS) was developed. The maximum score was 10, with each lobe contributing up to 2 points. A score of 0 was given for no contusion present in the lobe, 1 for less than 50 % contusion, and 2 for greater than 50 % contusion. A PCS of 4 was hypothesized to correlate with need for mechanical ventilation for over 48 h. A confusion matrix of the scoring algorithm was created, and inter-rater concordance was calculated from a randomly selected 125 patients.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 217 patients were identified. 118 patients (54 %) were admitted to the ICU, but only 23 patients (19 %) were intubated, and only 17 patients (8 %) required mechanical ventilation &gt; 48 h. Sensitivity of the scoring system was 20 %, while specificity was 93 %. Negative predictive value was 93 %. Inter-rater agreement was 77 %.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The PCS is a scoring system with high specificity and negative predictive value that can be used to evaluate the need for mechanical ventilation after sustaining blunt PC and can help properly allocate hospital resources.</p></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><p>IV - diagnostic criteria</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74890,"journal":{"name":"Surgery in practice and science","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100247"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262024000147/pdfft?md5=50257186706e56b5fde8be903d780796&pid=1-s2.0-S2666262024000147-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140621752","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Predicting in-hospital mortality using Elixhauser comorbidity in patients underwent single and multiple coronary artery bypass surgery 利用 Elixhauser 合并症预测接受单支和多支冠状动脉搭桥手术患者的院内死亡率
Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-04-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100246
Renxi Li , Stephen Huddleston

Background

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) is a high-risk surgery. Cardiovascular diseases are strongly associated with comorbidities. This study aimed to assess the prediction of in-hospital mortality by comorbidities in patients who underwent CABG.

Methods

The National Inpatient Sample database was used to extract patients who received 1, 2, 3, and 4+ CABG between Q4 2015 and 2020. Best-fit model by logistic regressions was used to predict in-hospital mortality by Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI). Moreover, age was adjusted in ECI prediction.

Results

There were 190,524, 83,725, 48,147, and 13,540 patients who underwent 1, 2, 3, and 4+ CABG, respectively. In-hospital mortality was best predicted by ECI in 3 CABG (c-statistic = 0.63, 95 % CI = 0.62–0.65), followed by 4+ CABG (c-statistic = 0.63, 95 % CI = 0.60–0.66), 1 CABG (c-statistic = 0.62, 95 % CI = 0.61–0.63), and 2 CABG (c-statistic = 0.62, 95 % CI = 0.61–0.63). After adjusting for age, ECI adequately predicted in-hospital mortality in 4+ CABG (c-statistic = 0.72, 95 % CI = 0.69–0.75) and 3 CABG (c-statistic = 0.69, 95 % CI = 0.68–0.71). Predictive powers for age-adjusted ECI were comparable in 1 CABG (c-statistic=0.67, 95 % CI = 0.66–0.68) and 2 CABG (c-statistic = 0.67, 95 % CI = 0.65–0.68).

Conclusions

ECI was a moderate (c-statistic 0.6–0.7) predictor of in-hospital mortality in all CABG. Age-adjusted ECI could effectively predict in-hospital mortality, especially in patients who underwent 3 and 4+ CABG.

背景冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)是一种高风险手术。心血管疾病与合并症密切相关。本研究旨在评估合并症对接受 CABG 患者院内死亡率的预测。方法使用全国住院患者抽样数据库,提取 2015 年第四季度至 2020 年期间接受 1、2、3 和 4+ CABG 的患者。采用逻辑回归的最佳拟合模型,通过艾利克肖瑟疾病指数(ECI)预测院内死亡率。结果接受 1、2、3 和 4+ CABG 的患者人数分别为 190524、83725、48147 和 13540 人。在 3 次 CABG(c-统计量 = 0.63,95 % CI = 0.62-0.65)、4 次以上 CABG(c-统计量 = 0.63,95 % CI = 0.60-0.66)、1 次 CABG(c-统计量 = 0.62,95 % CI = 0.61-0.63)和 2 次 CABG(c-统计量 = 0.62,95 % CI = 0.61-0.63)中,ECI 对院内死亡率的预测效果最佳。对年龄进行调整后,ECI 可充分预测 4+ CABG(c-统计量 = 0.72,95 % CI = 0.69-0.75)和 3 CABG(c-统计量 = 0.69,95 % CI = 0.68-0.71)的院内死亡率。在 1 次 CABG(c-统计量=0.67,95% CI = 0.66-0.68)和 2 次 CABG(c-统计量=0.67,95% CI = 0.65-0.68)中,年龄调整后 ECI 的预测能力相当。年龄调整后的ECI可有效预测院内死亡率,尤其是接受3次和4次以上CABG的患者。
{"title":"Predicting in-hospital mortality using Elixhauser comorbidity in patients underwent single and multiple coronary artery bypass surgery","authors":"Renxi Li ,&nbsp;Stephen Huddleston","doi":"10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100246","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100246","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) is a high-risk surgery. Cardiovascular diseases are strongly associated with comorbidities. This study aimed to assess the prediction of in-hospital mortality by comorbidities in patients who underwent CABG.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The National Inpatient Sample database was used to extract patients who received 1, 2, 3, and 4+ CABG between Q4 2015 and 2020. Best-fit model by logistic regressions was used to predict in-hospital mortality by Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI). Moreover, age was adjusted in ECI prediction.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were 190,524, 83,725, 48,147, and 13,540 patients who underwent 1, 2, 3, and 4+ CABG, respectively. In-hospital mortality was best predicted by ECI in 3 CABG (<em>c</em>-statistic = 0.63, 95 % CI = 0.62–0.65), followed by 4+ CABG (<em>c</em>-statistic = 0.63, 95 % CI = 0.60–0.66), 1 CABG (<em>c</em>-statistic = 0.62, 95 % CI = 0.61–0.63), and 2 CABG (<em>c</em>-statistic = 0.62, 95 % CI = 0.61–0.63). After adjusting for age, ECI adequately predicted in-hospital mortality in 4+ CABG (<em>c</em>-statistic = 0.72, 95 % CI = 0.69–0.75) and 3 CABG (<em>c</em>-statistic = 0.69, 95 % CI = 0.68–0.71). Predictive powers for age-adjusted ECI were comparable in 1 CABG (<em>c</em>-statistic=0.67, 95 % CI = 0.66–0.68) and 2 CABG (<em>c</em>-statistic = 0.67, 95 % CI = 0.65–0.68).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>ECI was a moderate (<em>c</em>-statistic 0.6–0.7) predictor of in-hospital mortality in all CABG. Age-adjusted ECI could effectively predict in-hospital mortality, especially in patients who underwent 3 and 4+ CABG.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74890,"journal":{"name":"Surgery in practice and science","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100246"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262024000135/pdfft?md5=b5189c977c86c425a945bd1d04e9c41a&pid=1-s2.0-S2666262024000135-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140557791","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Indications and outcomes of liver transplantation for liver tumors in the United States 美国肝脏肿瘤肝移植的适应症和结果
Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI: 10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100245
Kenji Okumura, Abhay Dhand, Kamil Hanna, Ryosuke Misawa, Hiroshi Sogawa, Gregory Veillette, Seigo Nishida

Background

While hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains the leading cause of liver transplant (LT) for liver tumors, indications have broadened over the years. Data regarding patient characteristics and outcomes of LT for liver tumors are limited.

Methods

From Jan-2002 to March-2022, 14,406 LT recipients for various liver tumors were identified in United Network for Organ Sharing database. Overall post-transplant survival analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox proportional-hazards model.

Results

During the study period, indications for LT for various hepatic tumors were HCC (88.5 %), benign tumors (5.1 %), cholangiocarcinoma (3.9 %), angiosarcoma (0.7 %), bile duct cancer (0.7 %), secondary tumors (0.5 %) and others (0.7 %). Compared to non-HCC, LT recipients for HCC were older (median age 61 vs 54 years, P < 0.001), more often male (77% vs 48 %, P < 0.001), more often Hispanic (16% vs 8.0 %), had higher BMI (28.2 vs 25.3, P < 0.001) and higher prevalence of Hepatitis C (53% vs 3.9 %, P < 0.001). Donor characteristics across various groups were similar. One-year survival in LT recipients of HCC was higher (HCC: 91.7% vs. non-HCC: 90.3 %) with adjusted Hazard Ratio (aHR) of 0.87; 95 % CI 0.77–0.99, P = 0.033 in a multivariable Cox regression analysis. Compared to HCC, survival outcomes were worse in cholangiocarcinoma (aHR 1.70; 95 %CI 1.43–2.01, P < 0.001), bile duct cancer (aHR 3.03; 95 %CI 2.12–4.33, P < 0.001), secondary tumors including colon cancer and neuroendocrine tumors (aHR 1.88; 95 % CI 1.24–2.85, P = 0.003), with best survival in patients with benign tumors (aHR 0.57; 95 %CI 0.46–0.70, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

LT is performed for various liver tumors with variable outcomes among these primary indications.

背景虽然肝细胞癌(HCC)仍是肝脏肿瘤肝移植(LT)的主要病因,但多年来适应症已有所扩大。方法从2002年1月至2022年3月,器官共享联合网络数据库共收集了14406例因各种肝脏肿瘤接受肝移植的患者。结果在研究期间,各种肝肿瘤的LT适应症为HCC(88.5%)、良性肿瘤(5.1%)、胆管癌(3.9%)、血管肉瘤(0.7%)、胆管癌(0.7%)、继发性肿瘤(0.5%)和其他(0.7%)。与非 HCC 相比,HCC 的 LT 受体年龄更大(中位年龄 61 岁对 54 岁,P < 0.001),男性更多(77% 对 48%,P < 0.001),西班牙裔更多(16% 对 8.0%),体重指数更高(28.2 对 25.3,P < 0.001),丙型肝炎患病率更高(53% 对 3.9%,P < 0.001)。各组别的供体特征相似。在多变量考克斯回归分析中,HCC LT受者的一年生存率更高(HCC:91.7% vs. 非HCC:90.3%),调整后危险比(aHR)为0.87;95 % CI 0.77-0.99,P = 0.033。与 HCC 相比,胆管癌(aHR 1.70; 95 %CI 1.43-2.01,P <0.001)、胆管癌(aHR 3.03; 95 %CI 2.12-4.33,P <0.001)、包括结肠癌和神经内分泌肿瘤在内的继发性肿瘤(aHR 1.88;95 %CI 1.24-2.85,P = 0.003),良性肿瘤患者的生存率最高(aHR 0.57;95 %CI 0.46-0.70,P <;0.001)。
{"title":"Indications and outcomes of liver transplantation for liver tumors in the United States","authors":"Kenji Okumura,&nbsp;Abhay Dhand,&nbsp;Kamil Hanna,&nbsp;Ryosuke Misawa,&nbsp;Hiroshi Sogawa,&nbsp;Gregory Veillette,&nbsp;Seigo Nishida","doi":"10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100245","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100245","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>While hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains the leading cause of liver transplant (LT) for liver tumors, indications have broadened over the years. Data regarding patient characteristics and outcomes of LT for liver tumors are limited.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>From Jan-2002 to March-2022, 14,406 LT recipients for various liver tumors were identified in United Network for Organ Sharing database. Overall post-transplant survival analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox proportional-hazards model.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During the study period, indications for LT for various hepatic tumors were HCC (88.5 %), benign tumors (5.1 %), cholangiocarcinoma (3.9 %), angiosarcoma (0.7 %), bile duct cancer (0.7 %), secondary tumors (0.5 %) and others (0.7 %). Compared to non-HCC, LT recipients for HCC were older (median age 61 vs 54 years, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), more often male (77% vs 48 %, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), more often Hispanic (16% vs 8.0 %), had higher BMI (28.2 vs 25.3, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and higher prevalence of Hepatitis C (53% vs 3.9 %, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Donor characteristics across various groups were similar. One-year survival in LT recipients of HCC was higher (HCC: 91.7% vs. non-HCC: 90.3 %) with adjusted Hazard Ratio (aHR) of 0.87; 95 % CI 0.77–0.99, <em>P</em> = 0.033 in a multivariable Cox regression analysis. Compared to HCC, survival outcomes were worse in cholangiocarcinoma (aHR 1.70; 95 %CI 1.43–2.01, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), bile duct cancer (aHR 3.03; 95 %CI 2.12–4.33, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), secondary tumors including colon cancer and neuroendocrine tumors (aHR 1.88; 95 % CI 1.24–2.85, <em>P</em> = 0.003), with best survival in patients with benign tumors (aHR 0.57; 95 %CI 0.46–0.70, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>LT is performed for various liver tumors with variable outcomes among these primary indications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74890,"journal":{"name":"Surgery in practice and science","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100245"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262024000123/pdfft?md5=6edd88d1fb293f935ce91927c2c3c344&pid=1-s2.0-S2666262024000123-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140894413","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Surgical risks and care trends: A cross sectional study of people experiencing homelessness presenting at a free clinic care in Miami-Dade County 手术风险和护理趋势:对迈阿密-戴德县免费诊所就诊的无家可归者的横断面研究
Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-04-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100244
Shivangi Parmar , Emily Eachus , Orly Morgan , Boris Yang , Violet Victoria , Suhas Seshadri , Armen Henderson , Stefan Kenel-Pierre , Joshua Laban

Background

The effects of housing insecurity on surgical care are under researched and largely unknown. Thus far, studies on surgery outcomes of people experiencing homelessness either focus on shelter-based patients or do not differentiate whether patients are sheltered or unsheltered, despite significant differences in care needs and health risks. Herein we provide the first report on surgical care trends of people experiencing unsheltered homelessness.

Methods

Clinical history, medication list, and blood pressure records of 300 people experiencing unsheltered homelessness receiving care at a free mobile clinic were deidentified, downloaded and analyzed in R studio 4.3.0. Participants were asked whether they had undergone surgery and included surgical history for those who had.

Results

Of 300 participants, 18 % (N = 55) had a history of surgery, most common being 1) orthopedics (N = 20), 2) vascular (N = 18), 3) general (N = 6), 4) acute trauma response (N = 5), 5) ophthalmology (N = 4), 6) surgical oncology (N = 2). Post-discharge, 13 % returned with wound site infections and 9 % were readmitted for treatment. Chi Square test showed Hypertension [X2 (1, n = 300)=10.9, p < 0.001] and Type II Diabetes [X2 (1, n = 300)=10.5, p = 0.0012] significantly increased likelihood of needing vascular surgery, particularly lower extremity wound debridement or amputation.

Conclusion

Little research has been done assessing surgical care trends for people experiencing unsheltered homelessness. Results indicate possible presence of barriers accessing cancer care and increased risk for vascular disease needing surgical intervention. Future research is needed to understand, address, and overcome current surgical care barriers to help this at-risk and underserved community.

背景住房不安全对外科护理的影响研究不足,而且在很大程度上不为人所知。迄今为止,有关无家可归者手术效果的研究要么集中在以庇护所为基础的病人身上,要么不区分病人是有庇护所的还是无庇护所的,尽管在护理需求和健康风险方面存在显著差异。方法对在免费流动诊所接受治疗的 300 名无家可归者的临床病史、药物清单和血压记录进行去身份化处理,并在 R studio 4.3.0 中下载和分析。结果 在 300 名参与者中,18%(N = 55)有手术史,最常见的手术有:1)骨科(N = 20);2)血管科(N = 18);3)普外科(N = 6);4)急性创伤反应科(N = 5);5)眼科(N = 4);6)肿瘤外科(N = 2)。出院后,13% 的患者因伤口感染返回医院,9% 的患者再次入院接受治疗。Chi Square检验显示,高血压[X2 (1, n = 300)=10.9, p < 0.001]和II型糖尿病[X2 (1, n = 300)=10.5, p = 0.0012]显著增加了需要血管手术的可能性,尤其是下肢伤口清创或截肢。研究结果表明,无家可归者在获得癌症治疗方面可能存在障碍,而且需要外科手术治疗的血管疾病风险增加。未来的研究需要了解、解决和克服当前的外科护理障碍,以帮助这个高危和服务不足的群体。
{"title":"Surgical risks and care trends: A cross sectional study of people experiencing homelessness presenting at a free clinic care in Miami-Dade County","authors":"Shivangi Parmar ,&nbsp;Emily Eachus ,&nbsp;Orly Morgan ,&nbsp;Boris Yang ,&nbsp;Violet Victoria ,&nbsp;Suhas Seshadri ,&nbsp;Armen Henderson ,&nbsp;Stefan Kenel-Pierre ,&nbsp;Joshua Laban","doi":"10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100244","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100244","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The effects of housing insecurity on surgical care are under researched and largely unknown. Thus far, studies on surgery outcomes of people experiencing homelessness either focus on shelter-based patients or do not differentiate whether patients are sheltered or unsheltered, despite significant differences in care needs and health risks. Herein we provide the first report on surgical care trends of people experiencing unsheltered homelessness.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Clinical history, medication list, and blood pressure records of 300 people experiencing unsheltered homelessness receiving care at a free mobile clinic were deidentified, downloaded and analyzed in R studio 4.3.0. Participants were asked whether they had undergone surgery and included surgical history for those who had.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 300 participants, 18 % (<em>N</em> = 55) had a history of surgery, most common being 1) orthopedics (<em>N</em> = 20), 2) vascular (<em>N</em> = 18), 3) general (<em>N</em> = 6), 4) acute trauma response (<em>N</em> = 5), 5) ophthalmology (<em>N</em> = 4), 6) surgical oncology (<em>N</em> = 2). Post-discharge, 13 % returned with wound site infections and 9 % were readmitted for treatment. Chi Square test showed Hypertension [X2 (1, <em>n</em> = 300)=10.9, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001] and Type II Diabetes [X2 (1, <em>n</em> = 300)=10.5, <em>p</em> = 0.0012] significantly increased likelihood of needing vascular surgery, particularly lower extremity wound debridement or amputation.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Little research has been done assessing surgical care trends for people experiencing unsheltered homelessness. Results indicate possible presence of barriers accessing cancer care and increased risk for vascular disease needing surgical intervention. Future research is needed to understand, address, and overcome current surgical care barriers to help this at-risk and underserved community.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74890,"journal":{"name":"Surgery in practice and science","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100244"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262024000111/pdfft?md5=e7a3e5f9196b9324a5ff46681f19cc7f&pid=1-s2.0-S2666262024000111-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140548558","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of nursing home admission on in-hospital mortality and morbidity and length of stay: A case-control analysis 入住疗养院对院内死亡率、发病率和住院时间的影响:病例对照分析
Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-03-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100243
Claudio Canal , Anne-Sophie Mittlmeier , Valentin Neuhaus , Hans-Christoph Pape , Mathias Schlögl

Methods

We examined a quality measurement database containing de-identified cases from across Switzerland. All patients with a complete dataset treated between 2015 and 2021 were included. A case-control matching method (same age, comorbidity, sex, diagnosis, admission type, and insurance coverage) was used to evaluate the impact of pre-admission residence. The outcomes measured included complications during hospitalization, in-hospital mortality, and length of stay. Statistical significance was set at a p-value of <0.001 due to our large size of analyzed cases.

Results

We noted a higher prevalence of comorbidities and higher ASA scores among the 2130 (1.9 %) patients admitted from long-term care facilities (LTCFs). Complication rates in the LTCF group were higher than those in the home group (15 % vs. 6.9 %, p = <0.001). Pneumonia was the most frequent complication in both groups. The in-hospital mortality rate was also significantly higher in the LTCF group than the home group (5.8 % vs. 1.1 %, p = <0.001). However, matched-pair analysis showed no significant difference in complication rates and overall mortality between the two groups. Patients admitted from LTCFs even had a shorter hospital stay (7.5 ± 8.7 days vs. 8.9 ± 7.9 days, p = <0.004).

Conclusions

Despite higher complication and mortality rates among LTCF patients, the matched-pair analysis showed no significant differences in these rates between the two groups. However, patients from LTCFs were discharged earlier, indicating the effectiveness of Switzerland's care system for older adults living in nursing homes.

方法我们研究了一个质量测量数据库,其中包含来自瑞士各地的去身份化病例。所有在 2015 年至 2021 年期间接受过治疗且拥有完整数据集的患者均被纳入其中。采用病例对照匹配法(相同的年龄、合并症、性别、诊断、入院类型和保险范围)来评估入院前居住地的影响。测量的结果包括住院期间的并发症、院内死亡率和住院时间。由于分析的病例较多,统计显著性的P值设定为<0.001。结果我们发现,在2130名(1.9%)从长期护理机构(LTCF)入院的患者中,合并症发生率较高,ASA评分也较高。长期护理机构组的并发症发生率高于家庭组(15% 对 6.9%,P = 0.001)。肺炎是两组中最常见的并发症。LTCF 组的院内死亡率也明显高于家庭组(5.8% 对 1.1%,p = 0.001)。不过,配对分析显示,两组患者的并发症发生率和总死亡率没有明显差异。结论尽管 LTCF 患者的并发症发生率和死亡率较高,但配对分析显示两组患者的并发症发生率和死亡率无明显差异。不过,来自 LTCF 的患者出院时间更早,这表明瑞士的护理系统对居住在养老院的老年人非常有效。
{"title":"Impact of nursing home admission on in-hospital mortality and morbidity and length of stay: A case-control analysis","authors":"Claudio Canal ,&nbsp;Anne-Sophie Mittlmeier ,&nbsp;Valentin Neuhaus ,&nbsp;Hans-Christoph Pape ,&nbsp;Mathias Schlögl","doi":"10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100243","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100243","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We examined a quality measurement database containing de-identified cases from across Switzerland. All patients with a complete dataset treated between 2015 and 2021 were included. A case-control matching method (same age, comorbidity, sex, diagnosis, admission type, and insurance coverage) was used to evaluate the impact of pre-admission residence. The outcomes measured included complications during hospitalization, in-hospital mortality, and length of stay. Statistical significance was set at a p-value of &lt;0.001 due to our large size of analyzed cases.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We noted a higher prevalence of comorbidities and higher ASA scores among the 2130 (1.9 %) patients admitted from long-term care facilities (LTCFs). Complication rates in the LTCF group were higher than those in the home group (15 % vs. 6.9 %, <em>p</em> = &lt;0.001). Pneumonia was the most frequent complication in both groups. The in-hospital mortality rate was also significantly higher in the LTCF group than the home group (5.8 % vs. 1.1 %, <em>p</em> = &lt;0.001). However, matched-pair analysis showed no significant difference in complication rates and overall mortality between the two groups. Patients admitted from LTCFs even had a shorter hospital stay (7.5 ± 8.7 days vs. 8.9 ± 7.9 days, <em>p</em> = &lt;0.004).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Despite higher complication and mortality rates among LTCF patients, the matched-pair analysis showed no significant differences in these rates between the two groups. However, patients from LTCFs were discharged earlier, indicating the effectiveness of Switzerland's care system for older adults living in nursing homes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74890,"journal":{"name":"Surgery in practice and science","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100243"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266626202400010X/pdfft?md5=dd3de3c847b126c1e6b6d000e3f9c42f&pid=1-s2.0-S266626202400010X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140344591","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Preoperative pulmonary function is associated with left ventricular assist device outcomes 术前肺功能与左心室辅助装置的疗效有关
Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-03-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100242
Austin Kluis, Aasim Afzal, Greg Milligan, J. Michael DiMaio, Nitin Kabra, David A. Rawitscher, Timothy J. George

Introduction

Although left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is associated with improved survival in patients with end-stage heart failure, the impact of preoperative pulmonary function on short-term outcomes is unclear.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of all primary LVAD implants at a single institution. Common measures of preoperative pulmonary function were evaluated. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

From 2017–2022, 107 patients underwent primary LVAD implantation. Prior to implantation, 68 (63.6 %) were on room air, 28 (26.4 %) were on nasal cannula, 2 (1.9 %) were on noninvasive positive pressure ventilation, and 9 (8.5 %) were on the ventilator. The average preoperative fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) was 25.3 ± 8.2 % while the mean percentage predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was 71.4 ± 20.9 %. Overall, 1-year survival was 86.8 %, the median postoperative ventilator time was 20.4 [4.2-77.7] h, and 18 (16.8 %) patients required postoperative tracheostomy. When stratified by pulmonary function, lower FEV1 and increased preoperative FiO2 were associated with decreased 1-year survival

Conclusions

In conclusion, preoperative pulmonary function is associated with short-term LVAD survival, postoperative ventilatory time, and need for tracheostomy. Therefore, rigorous pulmonary function evaluation may help in appropriate preoperative risk stratification.

导言虽然左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入与改善终末期心力衰竭患者的存活率有关,但术前肺功能对短期预后的影响尚不清楚。我们评估了术前肺功能的常用指标。结果2017-2022年,107名患者接受了原发性LVAD植入术。植入前,68 人(63.6%)使用室内空气,28 人(26.4%)使用鼻插管,2 人(1.9%)使用无创正压通气,9 人(8.5%)使用呼吸机。术前平均吸入氧饱和度(FiO2)为 25.3 ± 8.2%,平均预测一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)为 71.4 ± 20.9%。总体而言,1 年存活率为 86.8%,术后呼吸机中位时间为 20.4 [4.2-77.7] h,18 例(16.8%)患者术后需要进行气管切开术。结论:术前肺功能与 LVAD 的短期存活率、术后通气时间和气管切开术的需求有关。因此,严格的肺功能评估有助于进行适当的术前风险分层。
{"title":"Preoperative pulmonary function is associated with left ventricular assist device outcomes","authors":"Austin Kluis,&nbsp;Aasim Afzal,&nbsp;Greg Milligan,&nbsp;J. Michael DiMaio,&nbsp;Nitin Kabra,&nbsp;David A. Rawitscher,&nbsp;Timothy J. George","doi":"10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100242","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100242","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Although left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is associated with improved survival in patients with end-stage heart failure, the impact of preoperative pulmonary function on short-term outcomes is unclear.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a retrospective review of all primary LVAD implants at a single institution. Common measures of preoperative pulmonary function were evaluated. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From 2017–2022, 107 patients underwent primary LVAD implantation. Prior to implantation, 68 (63.6 %) were on room air, 28 (26.4 %) were on nasal cannula, 2 (1.9 %) were on noninvasive positive pressure ventilation, and 9 (8.5 %) were on the ventilator. The average preoperative fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) was 25.3 ± 8.2 % while the mean percentage predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was 71.4 ± 20.9 %. Overall, 1-year survival was 86.8 %, the median postoperative ventilator time was 20.4 [4.2-77.7] h, and 18 (16.8 %) patients required postoperative tracheostomy. When stratified by pulmonary function, lower FEV1 and increased preoperative FiO2 were associated with decreased 1-year survival</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In conclusion, preoperative pulmonary function is associated with short-term LVAD survival, postoperative ventilatory time, and need for tracheostomy. Therefore, rigorous pulmonary function evaluation may help in appropriate preoperative risk stratification.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74890,"journal":{"name":"Surgery in practice and science","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100242"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262024000093/pdfft?md5=bcaae70819b2517254c29af31b8989af&pid=1-s2.0-S2666262024000093-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140328184","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Retrospective registry-based nationwide analysis of the COVID-19 lockdown effect on the volume of general and visceral non-malignant surgical procedures 基于登记的全国范围内 COVID-19 封锁对普通和内脏非恶性外科手术量影响的回顾性分析
Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-03-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100241
René Fahrner , Eliane Dohner , Fiona Joséphine Kierdorf , Claudio Canal , Valentin Neuhaus

Introduction

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an acute virus infection, which was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. The Swiss government decreed a public lockdown to reduce and restrict further infections. The aim of this investigation was to analyze the impact of the first COVID-19 lockdown on the performance of general and visceral surgery procedures.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective study was performed on the basis of the surgical registry of the working group for quality assurance in surgery (“Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Qualitätssicherung in der Chirurgie” or AQC). All patients with specific surgical diagnoses (complicated gastric or duodenal ulcer, acute appendicitis, hernia, diverticular disease, gallstone disease, pilonidal sinus, cutaneous and perianal abscess) were analyzed during 2019 and the corresponding lockdown period of March 14 through April 26, 2020. Data regarding patients’ characteristics, diagnoses, and treatments were analyzed.

Results

In total, 3,330 patients were analyzed, with 2,203 patients treated in 2019 and 1,127 patients treated in 2020. There was a reduction in the number of all investigated diagnoses during the pandemic period, with statistically significant differences in acute appendicitis, hernia, diverticular disease, gallstone disease, pilonidal sinus (all p < 0.001), and cutaneous abscess (p = 0.01). The proportion of complicated appendicitis (p = 0.02), complicated hernia (p < 0.001), and complicated gallstone disease (choledocholithiasis p = 0.01; inflammation, p = 0.001) was significantly higher during the lockdown period. The surgical urgency rate in all patients was higher during the lockdown period compared to the control period (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The socioeconomic lockdown significantly impacted the number of general and visceral surgery procedures in Switzerland. The reasons for the reduction are multifactorial.

导言2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)是一种急性病毒感染,世界卫生组织宣布其为大流行病。瑞士政府颁布了公共封锁令,以减少和限制进一步的感染。这项调查旨在分析第一次 COVID-19 封锁对普外科和内脏外科手术的影响。材料与方法根据外科质量保证工作组(Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Qualitätssicherung in der Chirurgie,简称 AQC)的外科登记册进行了一项回顾性研究。在2019年以及2020年3月14日至4月26日的相应封锁期内,对所有具有特定手术诊断(复杂性胃溃疡或十二指肠溃疡、急性阑尾炎、疝气、憩室疾病、胆石症、皮样窦、皮肤和肛周脓肿)的患者进行了分析。结果共分析了3330名患者,其中2019年治疗了2203名患者,2020年治疗了1127名患者。在大流行期间,所有调查诊断的数量都有所减少,其中急性阑尾炎、疝气、憩室病、胆石症、皮样窦(所有 p < 0.001)和皮肤脓肿(p = 0.01)的差异具有统计学意义。在封锁期间,复杂性阑尾炎(p = 0.02)、复杂性疝气(p < 0.001)和复杂性胆石症(胆石症 p = 0.01;炎症,p = 0.001)的比例明显较高。结论社会经济封锁严重影响了瑞士普外科和内脏外科手术的数量。导致手术数量减少的原因是多方面的。
{"title":"Retrospective registry-based nationwide analysis of the COVID-19 lockdown effect on the volume of general and visceral non-malignant surgical procedures","authors":"René Fahrner ,&nbsp;Eliane Dohner ,&nbsp;Fiona Joséphine Kierdorf ,&nbsp;Claudio Canal ,&nbsp;Valentin Neuhaus","doi":"10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100241","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100241","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an acute virus infection, which was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. The Swiss government decreed a public lockdown to reduce and restrict further infections. The aim of this investigation was to analyze the impact of the first COVID-19 lockdown on the performance of general and visceral surgery procedures.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>A retrospective study was performed on the basis of the surgical registry of the working group for quality assurance in surgery (“Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Qualitätssicherung in der Chirurgie” or AQC). All patients with specific surgical diagnoses (complicated gastric or duodenal ulcer, acute appendicitis, hernia, diverticular disease, gallstone disease, pilonidal sinus, cutaneous and perianal abscess) were analyzed during 2019 and the corresponding lockdown period of March 14 through April 26, 2020. Data regarding patients’ characteristics, diagnoses, and treatments were analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 3,330 patients were analyzed, with 2,203 patients treated in 2019 and 1,127 patients treated in 2020. There was a reduction in the number of all investigated diagnoses during the pandemic period, with statistically significant differences in acute appendicitis, hernia, diverticular disease, gallstone disease, pilonidal sinus (all <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), and cutaneous abscess (<em>p</em> = 0.01). The proportion of complicated appendicitis (<em>p</em> = 0.02), complicated hernia (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), and complicated gallstone disease (choledocholithiasis <em>p</em> = 0.01; inflammation, <em>p</em> = 0.001) was significantly higher during the lockdown period. The surgical urgency rate in all patients was higher during the lockdown period compared to the control period (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The socioeconomic lockdown significantly impacted the number of general and visceral surgery procedures in Switzerland. The reasons for the reduction are multifactorial.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74890,"journal":{"name":"Surgery in practice and science","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100241"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262024000081/pdfft?md5=75a3ce301b9c8f3a92a1b2cb93d00fc0&pid=1-s2.0-S2666262024000081-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140164035","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Receptor discordance after nipple-sparing mastectomy 乳头保留乳房切除术后的受体不一致问题
Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-03-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100239
Rena Kojima , Makoto Ishitobi , Naomi Nagura , Ayaka Shimo , Hirohito Seki , Akiko Ogiya , Teruhisa Sakurai , Yukiko Seto , Shinsuke Sasada , Chiya Oshiro , Michiko Kato , Takahiko Kawate , Naoto Kondo , Tadahiko Shien

Background

Recent studies have shown that receptor status of breast cancer change between primary tumor and recurrence, which may influence treatment strategy and prognosis, but there are few reports on receptor discordance between primary tumors and local recurrence (LR) after nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM).

Patients and methods

We collected 74 patients who had LR after NSM for newly diagnosed stages 0 to 3 breast cancer between 2008 and 2016 at 14 institutions. We classified into 4 subtypes based on hormone receptor (HR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). We evaluated clinicopathological factors that correlate with receptor discordance and assessed the impact of receptor discordance on survival.

Results

Discordance rates in estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR) and HER2 were 9.5, 10.8 and 5.4 %, respectively. The most common change was from HR-/HER2+ to HR+/HER2+, and this pattern of receptor change occurred only in patients with nipple–areolar recurrence. Non-invasive tumors in LR, nipple–areolar recurrence (NAR), HR-/HER2+ primary tumor subtype, and the presence of chemotherapy for primary tumors were significantly associated with receptor discordance. With a median follow-up of 44.5 months (4–153 months), patients in the receptor-discordant group had no disease-free survival (DFS) event after LR resection (5-year DFS; 100 % in the receptor-discordant group vs 85.1 % in the receptor-concordant group; p = 0.2).

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates that the presence of chemotherapy for primary tumors, nipple-areolar recurrence, and its related factors (non-invasive tumor in LR, HR-/HER2+ primary tumor subtype) were associated with receptor discordance. However, further studies with longer follow-up periods and larger sample sizes are needed.

背景最近的研究表明,乳腺癌的受体状态在原发肿瘤和复发之间会发生变化,这可能会影响治疗策略和预后,但有关乳头保留乳房切除术(NSM)后原发肿瘤和局部复发(LR)之间受体不一致的报道却很少。患者和方法我们收集了2008年至2016年期间14家医疗机构中74名新诊断的0至3期乳腺癌患者NSM术后LR的情况。我们根据激素受体(HR)和人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)将其分为4个亚型。我们评估了与受体不一致相关的临床病理因素,并评估了受体不一致对生存的影响。结果雌激素受体(ER)、孕激素受体(PgR)和HER2的不一致率分别为9.5%、10.8%和5.4%。最常见的变化是从HR-/HER2+变为HR+/HER2+,这种受体变化模式仅出现在乳头乳晕复发的患者中。LR中的非浸润性肿瘤、乳头乳晕复发(NAR)、HR-/HER2+原发肿瘤亚型以及原发肿瘤化疗与受体不一致显著相关。中位随访时间为 44.5 个月(4-153 个月),受体不一致组患者在 LR 切除术后没有出现无病生存(DFS)事件(5 年 DFS:受体不一致组为 100%,受体一致组为 85.1%;P = 0.2)。我们的研究表明,原发肿瘤化疗、乳头乳晕复发及其相关因素(LR 中的非浸润性肿瘤、HR-/HER2+ 原发肿瘤亚型)与受体不一致相关。不过,还需要进行随访时间更长、样本量更大的进一步研究。
{"title":"Receptor discordance after nipple-sparing mastectomy","authors":"Rena Kojima ,&nbsp;Makoto Ishitobi ,&nbsp;Naomi Nagura ,&nbsp;Ayaka Shimo ,&nbsp;Hirohito Seki ,&nbsp;Akiko Ogiya ,&nbsp;Teruhisa Sakurai ,&nbsp;Yukiko Seto ,&nbsp;Shinsuke Sasada ,&nbsp;Chiya Oshiro ,&nbsp;Michiko Kato ,&nbsp;Takahiko Kawate ,&nbsp;Naoto Kondo ,&nbsp;Tadahiko Shien","doi":"10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100239","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100239","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Recent studies have shown that receptor status of breast cancer change between primary tumor and recurrence, which may influence treatment strategy and prognosis, but there are few reports on receptor discordance between primary tumors and local recurrence (LR) after nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM).</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>We collected 74 patients who had LR after NSM for newly diagnosed stages 0 to 3 breast cancer between 2008 and 2016 at 14 institutions. We classified into 4 subtypes based on hormone receptor (HR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). We evaluated clinicopathological factors that correlate with receptor discordance and assessed the impact of receptor discordance on survival.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Discordance rates in estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR) and HER2 were 9.5, 10.8 and 5.4 %, respectively. The most common change was from HR-/HER2+ to HR+/HER2+, and this pattern of receptor change occurred only in patients with nipple–areolar recurrence. Non-invasive tumors in LR, nipple–areolar recurrence (NAR), HR-/HER2+ primary tumor subtype, and the presence of chemotherapy for primary tumors were significantly associated with receptor discordance. With a median follow-up of 44.5 months (4–153 months), patients in the receptor-discordant group had no disease-free survival (DFS) event after LR resection (5-year DFS; 100 % in the receptor-discordant group vs 85.1 % in the receptor-concordant group; <em>p</em> = 0.2).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our study demonstrates that the presence of chemotherapy for primary tumors, nipple-areolar recurrence, and its related factors (non-invasive tumor in LR, HR-/HER2+ primary tumor subtype) were associated with receptor discordance. However, further studies with longer follow-up periods and larger sample sizes are needed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74890,"journal":{"name":"Surgery in practice and science","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100239"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262024000068/pdfft?md5=b7091c311e0271e7e2fb777cf2be4321&pid=1-s2.0-S2666262024000068-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140063140","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A meta-analysis of the American college of surgeons risk calculator's predictive accuracy among different surgical sub-specialties 美国外科医生学会风险计算器对不同外科亚专科预测准确性的荟萃分析
Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-02-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100238
Alyssa M. Goodwin, Steven S. Kurapaty, Jacqueline E. Inglis, Srikanth N. Divi, Alpesh A. Patel, Wellington K. Hsu

Background

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) provides risk estimates of postoperative complications. While several studies have examined the accuracy of the ACS-Surgical Risk Calculator (SRC) within a single specialty, the respective conclusions are limited by sample size. We sought to conduct a meta-analysis to determine the accuracy of the ACS-SRC among various surgical specialties.

Study design

Clinical studies that utilized the ACS-SRC, predicted complication rates compared to actual rates, and analyzed at least one metric reported by ACS-SRC met the inclusion criteria. Data for each specialty were pooled using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effect models and analyzed with the binary random-effect model to produce risk difference (RD) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) using Open Meta[Analyst].

Results

The initial search yielded 281 studies and, after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 53 studies remained with a total sample of 30,134 patients spanning 10 surgical specialties. When considering any complication and death, the ACS-SRC significantly underpredicted complications for: Orthopaedic Surgery (RD –0.067, p = 0.008), Spine (RD -0.027, p < 0.001), Urology (RD -0.03, p < 0.001), Surgical Oncology (RD -0.045, p < 0.001), and Gynecology (RD -0.098, p = 0.01).

Conclusion

The ACS-SRC proved useful in General, Acute Care, Colorectal, Otolaryngology, and Cardiothoracic Surgery, but significantly underpredicted complication rates in Spine, Orthopaedics, Urology, Surgical Oncology, and Gynecology. These data indicate the ACS-SRC is a reliable predictor in some specialties, but its use should be cautioned in the remaining specialties evaluated here.

背景美国外科学院国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)提供了术后并发症的风险估计值。虽然有几项研究对 ACS 手术风险计算器(SRC)在单一专科内的准确性进行了研究,但各自的结论都受到样本量的限制。我们试图进行一项荟萃分析,以确定 ACS-SRC 在各外科专科中的准确性。研究设计使用 ACS-SRC、预测并发症发生率并与实际发生率进行比较、分析 ACS-SRC 报告的至少一项指标的临床研究均符合纳入标准。使用DerSimonian和Laird随机效应模型对每个专科的数据进行汇总,并使用Open Meta[分析师]对二元随机效应模型进行分析,以得出风险差异(RD)和95%置信区间(CIs)。结果最初的搜索结果为281项研究,在应用纳入和排除标准后,共剩下53项研究,总样本为30134名患者,涉及10个外科专科。考虑到任何并发症和死亡,ACS-SRC 对以下并发症的预测明显偏低:骨外科(RD -0.067,p = 0.008)、脊柱外科(RD -0.027,p = 0.001)、泌尿外科(RD -0.03,p = 0.001)、肿瘤外科(RD -0.045,p = 0.001)和妇科(RD -0.098,p = 0.01)。结论 ACS-SRC 在普通外科、急症护理、结直肠外科、耳鼻喉科和心胸外科中证明是有用的,但在脊柱外科、骨科、泌尿外科、肿瘤外科和妇科中对并发症发生率的预测明显不足。这些数据表明,ACS-SRC 是某些专科的可靠预测指标,但在本文评估的其余专科中应谨慎使用。
{"title":"A meta-analysis of the American college of surgeons risk calculator's predictive accuracy among different surgical sub-specialties","authors":"Alyssa M. Goodwin,&nbsp;Steven S. Kurapaty,&nbsp;Jacqueline E. Inglis,&nbsp;Srikanth N. Divi,&nbsp;Alpesh A. Patel,&nbsp;Wellington K. Hsu","doi":"10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100238","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100238","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) provides risk estimates of postoperative complications. While several studies have examined the accuracy of the ACS-Surgical Risk Calculator (SRC) within a single specialty, the respective conclusions are limited by sample size. We sought to conduct a meta-analysis to determine the accuracy of the ACS-SRC among various surgical specialties.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Clinical studies that utilized the ACS-SRC, predicted complication rates compared to actual rates, and analyzed at least one metric reported by ACS-SRC met the inclusion criteria. Data for each specialty were pooled using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effect models and analyzed with the binary random-effect model to produce risk difference (RD) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) using Open Meta[A<em>nalyst</em>].</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The initial search yielded 281 studies and, after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 53 studies remained with a total sample of 30,134 patients spanning 10 surgical specialties. When considering any complication and death, the ACS-SRC significantly underpredicted complications for: Orthopaedic Surgery (RD –0.067, <em>p</em> = 0.008), Spine (RD -0.027, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), Urology (RD -0.03, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), Surgical Oncology (RD -0.045, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), and Gynecology (RD -0.098, <em>p</em> = 0.01).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The ACS-SRC proved useful in General, Acute Care, Colorectal, Otolaryngology, and Cardiothoracic Surgery, but significantly underpredicted complication rates in Spine, Orthopaedics, Urology, Surgical Oncology, and Gynecology. These data indicate the ACS-SRC is a reliable predictor in some specialties, but its use should be cautioned in the remaining specialties evaluated here.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74890,"journal":{"name":"Surgery in practice and science","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262024000056/pdfft?md5=d20a6752b84c885e3126caa50207a7e2&pid=1-s2.0-S2666262024000056-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139748894","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Surgery in practice and science
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1