首页 > 最新文献

Surgery in practice and science最新文献

英文 中文
Impact of nursing home admission on in-hospital mortality and morbidity and length of stay: A case-control analysis 入住疗养院对院内死亡率、发病率和住院时间的影响:病例对照分析
Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-03-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100243
Claudio Canal , Anne-Sophie Mittlmeier , Valentin Neuhaus , Hans-Christoph Pape , Mathias Schlögl

Methods

We examined a quality measurement database containing de-identified cases from across Switzerland. All patients with a complete dataset treated between 2015 and 2021 were included. A case-control matching method (same age, comorbidity, sex, diagnosis, admission type, and insurance coverage) was used to evaluate the impact of pre-admission residence. The outcomes measured included complications during hospitalization, in-hospital mortality, and length of stay. Statistical significance was set at a p-value of <0.001 due to our large size of analyzed cases.

Results

We noted a higher prevalence of comorbidities and higher ASA scores among the 2130 (1.9 %) patients admitted from long-term care facilities (LTCFs). Complication rates in the LTCF group were higher than those in the home group (15 % vs. 6.9 %, p = <0.001). Pneumonia was the most frequent complication in both groups. The in-hospital mortality rate was also significantly higher in the LTCF group than the home group (5.8 % vs. 1.1 %, p = <0.001). However, matched-pair analysis showed no significant difference in complication rates and overall mortality between the two groups. Patients admitted from LTCFs even had a shorter hospital stay (7.5 ± 8.7 days vs. 8.9 ± 7.9 days, p = <0.004).

Conclusions

Despite higher complication and mortality rates among LTCF patients, the matched-pair analysis showed no significant differences in these rates between the two groups. However, patients from LTCFs were discharged earlier, indicating the effectiveness of Switzerland's care system for older adults living in nursing homes.

方法我们研究了一个质量测量数据库,其中包含来自瑞士各地的去身份化病例。所有在 2015 年至 2021 年期间接受过治疗且拥有完整数据集的患者均被纳入其中。采用病例对照匹配法(相同的年龄、合并症、性别、诊断、入院类型和保险范围)来评估入院前居住地的影响。测量的结果包括住院期间的并发症、院内死亡率和住院时间。由于分析的病例较多,统计显著性的P值设定为<0.001。结果我们发现,在2130名(1.9%)从长期护理机构(LTCF)入院的患者中,合并症发生率较高,ASA评分也较高。长期护理机构组的并发症发生率高于家庭组(15% 对 6.9%,P = 0.001)。肺炎是两组中最常见的并发症。LTCF 组的院内死亡率也明显高于家庭组(5.8% 对 1.1%,p = 0.001)。不过,配对分析显示,两组患者的并发症发生率和总死亡率没有明显差异。结论尽管 LTCF 患者的并发症发生率和死亡率较高,但配对分析显示两组患者的并发症发生率和死亡率无明显差异。不过,来自 LTCF 的患者出院时间更早,这表明瑞士的护理系统对居住在养老院的老年人非常有效。
{"title":"Impact of nursing home admission on in-hospital mortality and morbidity and length of stay: A case-control analysis","authors":"Claudio Canal ,&nbsp;Anne-Sophie Mittlmeier ,&nbsp;Valentin Neuhaus ,&nbsp;Hans-Christoph Pape ,&nbsp;Mathias Schlögl","doi":"10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100243","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100243","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We examined a quality measurement database containing de-identified cases from across Switzerland. All patients with a complete dataset treated between 2015 and 2021 were included. A case-control matching method (same age, comorbidity, sex, diagnosis, admission type, and insurance coverage) was used to evaluate the impact of pre-admission residence. The outcomes measured included complications during hospitalization, in-hospital mortality, and length of stay. Statistical significance was set at a p-value of &lt;0.001 due to our large size of analyzed cases.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We noted a higher prevalence of comorbidities and higher ASA scores among the 2130 (1.9 %) patients admitted from long-term care facilities (LTCFs). Complication rates in the LTCF group were higher than those in the home group (15 % vs. 6.9 %, <em>p</em> = &lt;0.001). Pneumonia was the most frequent complication in both groups. The in-hospital mortality rate was also significantly higher in the LTCF group than the home group (5.8 % vs. 1.1 %, <em>p</em> = &lt;0.001). However, matched-pair analysis showed no significant difference in complication rates and overall mortality between the two groups. Patients admitted from LTCFs even had a shorter hospital stay (7.5 ± 8.7 days vs. 8.9 ± 7.9 days, <em>p</em> = &lt;0.004).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Despite higher complication and mortality rates among LTCF patients, the matched-pair analysis showed no significant differences in these rates between the two groups. However, patients from LTCFs were discharged earlier, indicating the effectiveness of Switzerland's care system for older adults living in nursing homes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74890,"journal":{"name":"Surgery in practice and science","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100243"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266626202400010X/pdfft?md5=dd3de3c847b126c1e6b6d000e3f9c42f&pid=1-s2.0-S266626202400010X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140344591","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Preoperative pulmonary function is associated with left ventricular assist device outcomes 术前肺功能与左心室辅助装置的疗效有关
Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-03-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100242
Austin Kluis, Aasim Afzal, Greg Milligan, J. Michael DiMaio, Nitin Kabra, David A. Rawitscher, Timothy J. George

Introduction

Although left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is associated with improved survival in patients with end-stage heart failure, the impact of preoperative pulmonary function on short-term outcomes is unclear.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of all primary LVAD implants at a single institution. Common measures of preoperative pulmonary function were evaluated. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

From 2017–2022, 107 patients underwent primary LVAD implantation. Prior to implantation, 68 (63.6 %) were on room air, 28 (26.4 %) were on nasal cannula, 2 (1.9 %) were on noninvasive positive pressure ventilation, and 9 (8.5 %) were on the ventilator. The average preoperative fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) was 25.3 ± 8.2 % while the mean percentage predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was 71.4 ± 20.9 %. Overall, 1-year survival was 86.8 %, the median postoperative ventilator time was 20.4 [4.2-77.7] h, and 18 (16.8 %) patients required postoperative tracheostomy. When stratified by pulmonary function, lower FEV1 and increased preoperative FiO2 were associated with decreased 1-year survival

Conclusions

In conclusion, preoperative pulmonary function is associated with short-term LVAD survival, postoperative ventilatory time, and need for tracheostomy. Therefore, rigorous pulmonary function evaluation may help in appropriate preoperative risk stratification.

导言虽然左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入与改善终末期心力衰竭患者的存活率有关,但术前肺功能对短期预后的影响尚不清楚。我们评估了术前肺功能的常用指标。结果2017-2022年,107名患者接受了原发性LVAD植入术。植入前,68 人(63.6%)使用室内空气,28 人(26.4%)使用鼻插管,2 人(1.9%)使用无创正压通气,9 人(8.5%)使用呼吸机。术前平均吸入氧饱和度(FiO2)为 25.3 ± 8.2%,平均预测一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)为 71.4 ± 20.9%。总体而言,1 年存活率为 86.8%,术后呼吸机中位时间为 20.4 [4.2-77.7] h,18 例(16.8%)患者术后需要进行气管切开术。结论:术前肺功能与 LVAD 的短期存活率、术后通气时间和气管切开术的需求有关。因此,严格的肺功能评估有助于进行适当的术前风险分层。
{"title":"Preoperative pulmonary function is associated with left ventricular assist device outcomes","authors":"Austin Kluis,&nbsp;Aasim Afzal,&nbsp;Greg Milligan,&nbsp;J. Michael DiMaio,&nbsp;Nitin Kabra,&nbsp;David A. Rawitscher,&nbsp;Timothy J. George","doi":"10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100242","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100242","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Although left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is associated with improved survival in patients with end-stage heart failure, the impact of preoperative pulmonary function on short-term outcomes is unclear.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a retrospective review of all primary LVAD implants at a single institution. Common measures of preoperative pulmonary function were evaluated. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From 2017–2022, 107 patients underwent primary LVAD implantation. Prior to implantation, 68 (63.6 %) were on room air, 28 (26.4 %) were on nasal cannula, 2 (1.9 %) were on noninvasive positive pressure ventilation, and 9 (8.5 %) were on the ventilator. The average preoperative fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) was 25.3 ± 8.2 % while the mean percentage predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was 71.4 ± 20.9 %. Overall, 1-year survival was 86.8 %, the median postoperative ventilator time was 20.4 [4.2-77.7] h, and 18 (16.8 %) patients required postoperative tracheostomy. When stratified by pulmonary function, lower FEV1 and increased preoperative FiO2 were associated with decreased 1-year survival</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In conclusion, preoperative pulmonary function is associated with short-term LVAD survival, postoperative ventilatory time, and need for tracheostomy. Therefore, rigorous pulmonary function evaluation may help in appropriate preoperative risk stratification.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74890,"journal":{"name":"Surgery in practice and science","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100242"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262024000093/pdfft?md5=bcaae70819b2517254c29af31b8989af&pid=1-s2.0-S2666262024000093-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140328184","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Retrospective registry-based nationwide analysis of the COVID-19 lockdown effect on the volume of general and visceral non-malignant surgical procedures 基于登记的全国范围内 COVID-19 封锁对普通和内脏非恶性外科手术量影响的回顾性分析
Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-03-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100241
René Fahrner , Eliane Dohner , Fiona Joséphine Kierdorf , Claudio Canal , Valentin Neuhaus

Introduction

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an acute virus infection, which was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. The Swiss government decreed a public lockdown to reduce and restrict further infections. The aim of this investigation was to analyze the impact of the first COVID-19 lockdown on the performance of general and visceral surgery procedures.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective study was performed on the basis of the surgical registry of the working group for quality assurance in surgery (“Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Qualitätssicherung in der Chirurgie” or AQC). All patients with specific surgical diagnoses (complicated gastric or duodenal ulcer, acute appendicitis, hernia, diverticular disease, gallstone disease, pilonidal sinus, cutaneous and perianal abscess) were analyzed during 2019 and the corresponding lockdown period of March 14 through April 26, 2020. Data regarding patients’ characteristics, diagnoses, and treatments were analyzed.

Results

In total, 3,330 patients were analyzed, with 2,203 patients treated in 2019 and 1,127 patients treated in 2020. There was a reduction in the number of all investigated diagnoses during the pandemic period, with statistically significant differences in acute appendicitis, hernia, diverticular disease, gallstone disease, pilonidal sinus (all p < 0.001), and cutaneous abscess (p = 0.01). The proportion of complicated appendicitis (p = 0.02), complicated hernia (p < 0.001), and complicated gallstone disease (choledocholithiasis p = 0.01; inflammation, p = 0.001) was significantly higher during the lockdown period. The surgical urgency rate in all patients was higher during the lockdown period compared to the control period (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The socioeconomic lockdown significantly impacted the number of general and visceral surgery procedures in Switzerland. The reasons for the reduction are multifactorial.

导言2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)是一种急性病毒感染,世界卫生组织宣布其为大流行病。瑞士政府颁布了公共封锁令,以减少和限制进一步的感染。这项调查旨在分析第一次 COVID-19 封锁对普外科和内脏外科手术的影响。材料与方法根据外科质量保证工作组(Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Qualitätssicherung in der Chirurgie,简称 AQC)的外科登记册进行了一项回顾性研究。在2019年以及2020年3月14日至4月26日的相应封锁期内,对所有具有特定手术诊断(复杂性胃溃疡或十二指肠溃疡、急性阑尾炎、疝气、憩室疾病、胆石症、皮样窦、皮肤和肛周脓肿)的患者进行了分析。结果共分析了3330名患者,其中2019年治疗了2203名患者,2020年治疗了1127名患者。在大流行期间,所有调查诊断的数量都有所减少,其中急性阑尾炎、疝气、憩室病、胆石症、皮样窦(所有 p < 0.001)和皮肤脓肿(p = 0.01)的差异具有统计学意义。在封锁期间,复杂性阑尾炎(p = 0.02)、复杂性疝气(p < 0.001)和复杂性胆石症(胆石症 p = 0.01;炎症,p = 0.001)的比例明显较高。结论社会经济封锁严重影响了瑞士普外科和内脏外科手术的数量。导致手术数量减少的原因是多方面的。
{"title":"Retrospective registry-based nationwide analysis of the COVID-19 lockdown effect on the volume of general and visceral non-malignant surgical procedures","authors":"René Fahrner ,&nbsp;Eliane Dohner ,&nbsp;Fiona Joséphine Kierdorf ,&nbsp;Claudio Canal ,&nbsp;Valentin Neuhaus","doi":"10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100241","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100241","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an acute virus infection, which was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. The Swiss government decreed a public lockdown to reduce and restrict further infections. The aim of this investigation was to analyze the impact of the first COVID-19 lockdown on the performance of general and visceral surgery procedures.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>A retrospective study was performed on the basis of the surgical registry of the working group for quality assurance in surgery (“Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Qualitätssicherung in der Chirurgie” or AQC). All patients with specific surgical diagnoses (complicated gastric or duodenal ulcer, acute appendicitis, hernia, diverticular disease, gallstone disease, pilonidal sinus, cutaneous and perianal abscess) were analyzed during 2019 and the corresponding lockdown period of March 14 through April 26, 2020. Data regarding patients’ characteristics, diagnoses, and treatments were analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 3,330 patients were analyzed, with 2,203 patients treated in 2019 and 1,127 patients treated in 2020. There was a reduction in the number of all investigated diagnoses during the pandemic period, with statistically significant differences in acute appendicitis, hernia, diverticular disease, gallstone disease, pilonidal sinus (all <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), and cutaneous abscess (<em>p</em> = 0.01). The proportion of complicated appendicitis (<em>p</em> = 0.02), complicated hernia (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), and complicated gallstone disease (choledocholithiasis <em>p</em> = 0.01; inflammation, <em>p</em> = 0.001) was significantly higher during the lockdown period. The surgical urgency rate in all patients was higher during the lockdown period compared to the control period (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The socioeconomic lockdown significantly impacted the number of general and visceral surgery procedures in Switzerland. The reasons for the reduction are multifactorial.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74890,"journal":{"name":"Surgery in practice and science","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100241"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262024000081/pdfft?md5=75a3ce301b9c8f3a92a1b2cb93d00fc0&pid=1-s2.0-S2666262024000081-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140164035","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Receptor discordance after nipple-sparing mastectomy 乳头保留乳房切除术后的受体不一致问题
Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-03-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100239
Rena Kojima , Makoto Ishitobi , Naomi Nagura , Ayaka Shimo , Hirohito Seki , Akiko Ogiya , Teruhisa Sakurai , Yukiko Seto , Shinsuke Sasada , Chiya Oshiro , Michiko Kato , Takahiko Kawate , Naoto Kondo , Tadahiko Shien

Background

Recent studies have shown that receptor status of breast cancer change between primary tumor and recurrence, which may influence treatment strategy and prognosis, but there are few reports on receptor discordance between primary tumors and local recurrence (LR) after nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM).

Patients and methods

We collected 74 patients who had LR after NSM for newly diagnosed stages 0 to 3 breast cancer between 2008 and 2016 at 14 institutions. We classified into 4 subtypes based on hormone receptor (HR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). We evaluated clinicopathological factors that correlate with receptor discordance and assessed the impact of receptor discordance on survival.

Results

Discordance rates in estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR) and HER2 were 9.5, 10.8 and 5.4 %, respectively. The most common change was from HR-/HER2+ to HR+/HER2+, and this pattern of receptor change occurred only in patients with nipple–areolar recurrence. Non-invasive tumors in LR, nipple–areolar recurrence (NAR), HR-/HER2+ primary tumor subtype, and the presence of chemotherapy for primary tumors were significantly associated with receptor discordance. With a median follow-up of 44.5 months (4–153 months), patients in the receptor-discordant group had no disease-free survival (DFS) event after LR resection (5-year DFS; 100 % in the receptor-discordant group vs 85.1 % in the receptor-concordant group; p = 0.2).

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates that the presence of chemotherapy for primary tumors, nipple-areolar recurrence, and its related factors (non-invasive tumor in LR, HR-/HER2+ primary tumor subtype) were associated with receptor discordance. However, further studies with longer follow-up periods and larger sample sizes are needed.

背景最近的研究表明,乳腺癌的受体状态在原发肿瘤和复发之间会发生变化,这可能会影响治疗策略和预后,但有关乳头保留乳房切除术(NSM)后原发肿瘤和局部复发(LR)之间受体不一致的报道却很少。患者和方法我们收集了2008年至2016年期间14家医疗机构中74名新诊断的0至3期乳腺癌患者NSM术后LR的情况。我们根据激素受体(HR)和人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)将其分为4个亚型。我们评估了与受体不一致相关的临床病理因素,并评估了受体不一致对生存的影响。结果雌激素受体(ER)、孕激素受体(PgR)和HER2的不一致率分别为9.5%、10.8%和5.4%。最常见的变化是从HR-/HER2+变为HR+/HER2+,这种受体变化模式仅出现在乳头乳晕复发的患者中。LR中的非浸润性肿瘤、乳头乳晕复发(NAR)、HR-/HER2+原发肿瘤亚型以及原发肿瘤化疗与受体不一致显著相关。中位随访时间为 44.5 个月(4-153 个月),受体不一致组患者在 LR 切除术后没有出现无病生存(DFS)事件(5 年 DFS:受体不一致组为 100%,受体一致组为 85.1%;P = 0.2)。我们的研究表明,原发肿瘤化疗、乳头乳晕复发及其相关因素(LR 中的非浸润性肿瘤、HR-/HER2+ 原发肿瘤亚型)与受体不一致相关。不过,还需要进行随访时间更长、样本量更大的进一步研究。
{"title":"Receptor discordance after nipple-sparing mastectomy","authors":"Rena Kojima ,&nbsp;Makoto Ishitobi ,&nbsp;Naomi Nagura ,&nbsp;Ayaka Shimo ,&nbsp;Hirohito Seki ,&nbsp;Akiko Ogiya ,&nbsp;Teruhisa Sakurai ,&nbsp;Yukiko Seto ,&nbsp;Shinsuke Sasada ,&nbsp;Chiya Oshiro ,&nbsp;Michiko Kato ,&nbsp;Takahiko Kawate ,&nbsp;Naoto Kondo ,&nbsp;Tadahiko Shien","doi":"10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100239","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100239","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Recent studies have shown that receptor status of breast cancer change between primary tumor and recurrence, which may influence treatment strategy and prognosis, but there are few reports on receptor discordance between primary tumors and local recurrence (LR) after nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM).</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>We collected 74 patients who had LR after NSM for newly diagnosed stages 0 to 3 breast cancer between 2008 and 2016 at 14 institutions. We classified into 4 subtypes based on hormone receptor (HR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). We evaluated clinicopathological factors that correlate with receptor discordance and assessed the impact of receptor discordance on survival.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Discordance rates in estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR) and HER2 were 9.5, 10.8 and 5.4 %, respectively. The most common change was from HR-/HER2+ to HR+/HER2+, and this pattern of receptor change occurred only in patients with nipple–areolar recurrence. Non-invasive tumors in LR, nipple–areolar recurrence (NAR), HR-/HER2+ primary tumor subtype, and the presence of chemotherapy for primary tumors were significantly associated with receptor discordance. With a median follow-up of 44.5 months (4–153 months), patients in the receptor-discordant group had no disease-free survival (DFS) event after LR resection (5-year DFS; 100 % in the receptor-discordant group vs 85.1 % in the receptor-concordant group; <em>p</em> = 0.2).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our study demonstrates that the presence of chemotherapy for primary tumors, nipple-areolar recurrence, and its related factors (non-invasive tumor in LR, HR-/HER2+ primary tumor subtype) were associated with receptor discordance. However, further studies with longer follow-up periods and larger sample sizes are needed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74890,"journal":{"name":"Surgery in practice and science","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100239"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262024000068/pdfft?md5=b7091c311e0271e7e2fb777cf2be4321&pid=1-s2.0-S2666262024000068-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140063140","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A meta-analysis of the American college of surgeons risk calculator's predictive accuracy among different surgical sub-specialties 美国外科医生学会风险计算器对不同外科亚专科预测准确性的荟萃分析
Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-02-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100238
Alyssa M. Goodwin, Steven S. Kurapaty, Jacqueline E. Inglis, Srikanth N. Divi, Alpesh A. Patel, Wellington K. Hsu

Background

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) provides risk estimates of postoperative complications. While several studies have examined the accuracy of the ACS-Surgical Risk Calculator (SRC) within a single specialty, the respective conclusions are limited by sample size. We sought to conduct a meta-analysis to determine the accuracy of the ACS-SRC among various surgical specialties.

Study design

Clinical studies that utilized the ACS-SRC, predicted complication rates compared to actual rates, and analyzed at least one metric reported by ACS-SRC met the inclusion criteria. Data for each specialty were pooled using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effect models and analyzed with the binary random-effect model to produce risk difference (RD) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) using Open Meta[Analyst].

Results

The initial search yielded 281 studies and, after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 53 studies remained with a total sample of 30,134 patients spanning 10 surgical specialties. When considering any complication and death, the ACS-SRC significantly underpredicted complications for: Orthopaedic Surgery (RD –0.067, p = 0.008), Spine (RD -0.027, p < 0.001), Urology (RD -0.03, p < 0.001), Surgical Oncology (RD -0.045, p < 0.001), and Gynecology (RD -0.098, p = 0.01).

Conclusion

The ACS-SRC proved useful in General, Acute Care, Colorectal, Otolaryngology, and Cardiothoracic Surgery, but significantly underpredicted complication rates in Spine, Orthopaedics, Urology, Surgical Oncology, and Gynecology. These data indicate the ACS-SRC is a reliable predictor in some specialties, but its use should be cautioned in the remaining specialties evaluated here.

背景美国外科学院国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)提供了术后并发症的风险估计值。虽然有几项研究对 ACS 手术风险计算器(SRC)在单一专科内的准确性进行了研究,但各自的结论都受到样本量的限制。我们试图进行一项荟萃分析,以确定 ACS-SRC 在各外科专科中的准确性。研究设计使用 ACS-SRC、预测并发症发生率并与实际发生率进行比较、分析 ACS-SRC 报告的至少一项指标的临床研究均符合纳入标准。使用DerSimonian和Laird随机效应模型对每个专科的数据进行汇总,并使用Open Meta[分析师]对二元随机效应模型进行分析,以得出风险差异(RD)和95%置信区间(CIs)。结果最初的搜索结果为281项研究,在应用纳入和排除标准后,共剩下53项研究,总样本为30134名患者,涉及10个外科专科。考虑到任何并发症和死亡,ACS-SRC 对以下并发症的预测明显偏低:骨外科(RD -0.067,p = 0.008)、脊柱外科(RD -0.027,p = 0.001)、泌尿外科(RD -0.03,p = 0.001)、肿瘤外科(RD -0.045,p = 0.001)和妇科(RD -0.098,p = 0.01)。结论 ACS-SRC 在普通外科、急症护理、结直肠外科、耳鼻喉科和心胸外科中证明是有用的,但在脊柱外科、骨科、泌尿外科、肿瘤外科和妇科中对并发症发生率的预测明显不足。这些数据表明,ACS-SRC 是某些专科的可靠预测指标,但在本文评估的其余专科中应谨慎使用。
{"title":"A meta-analysis of the American college of surgeons risk calculator's predictive accuracy among different surgical sub-specialties","authors":"Alyssa M. Goodwin,&nbsp;Steven S. Kurapaty,&nbsp;Jacqueline E. Inglis,&nbsp;Srikanth N. Divi,&nbsp;Alpesh A. Patel,&nbsp;Wellington K. Hsu","doi":"10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100238","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100238","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) provides risk estimates of postoperative complications. While several studies have examined the accuracy of the ACS-Surgical Risk Calculator (SRC) within a single specialty, the respective conclusions are limited by sample size. We sought to conduct a meta-analysis to determine the accuracy of the ACS-SRC among various surgical specialties.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Clinical studies that utilized the ACS-SRC, predicted complication rates compared to actual rates, and analyzed at least one metric reported by ACS-SRC met the inclusion criteria. Data for each specialty were pooled using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effect models and analyzed with the binary random-effect model to produce risk difference (RD) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) using Open Meta[A<em>nalyst</em>].</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The initial search yielded 281 studies and, after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 53 studies remained with a total sample of 30,134 patients spanning 10 surgical specialties. When considering any complication and death, the ACS-SRC significantly underpredicted complications for: Orthopaedic Surgery (RD –0.067, <em>p</em> = 0.008), Spine (RD -0.027, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), Urology (RD -0.03, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), Surgical Oncology (RD -0.045, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), and Gynecology (RD -0.098, <em>p</em> = 0.01).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The ACS-SRC proved useful in General, Acute Care, Colorectal, Otolaryngology, and Cardiothoracic Surgery, but significantly underpredicted complication rates in Spine, Orthopaedics, Urology, Surgical Oncology, and Gynecology. These data indicate the ACS-SRC is a reliable predictor in some specialties, but its use should be cautioned in the remaining specialties evaluated here.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74890,"journal":{"name":"Surgery in practice and science","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262024000056/pdfft?md5=d20a6752b84c885e3126caa50207a7e2&pid=1-s2.0-S2666262024000056-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139748894","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Totally implantable venous access devices: A restrospective analysis of morbidity and risk factors in a hospital with multi-technique approaches 全植入式静脉通路装置:对一家采用多种技术方法的医院的发病率和风险因素的回顾性分析
Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-02-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100237
Diogo Melo-Pinto , Tatiana Moreira-Marques , Emanuel Guerreiro , Marina Morais

Background

Totally implantable venous central access devices (TIVADs) can be implanted by open surgery or by direct puncture in the subclavian (ScV), internal jugular (IJV) or cephalic (CephV) veins.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted in 201 patients. Thirty-day follow-up data was analyzed to compare the outcomes of different techniques and evaluation of risk factors.

Results

Complications were reported in 3.8 % of the patients with no overall differences between different vascular accesses. Direct puncture was associated with more accidental arterial punction (p = 0.01). History of previous catheters was a risk factor for immediate complications (p = 0.01) and patients with history of thoracic disease had more early and late complications (p = 0.03 and p = 0.04, respectively). Late complications were more common in patients over 60 years old (p = 0.04) and with chronic pain (p = 0.03).

Conclusion

There was no difference in overall complication rates between the implantation techniques. Further prospective randomized controlled trials would clarify the most effective technique.

背景可通过开放手术或直接穿刺锁骨下静脉(ScV)、颈内静脉(IJV)或头静脉(CephV)植入全植入式中央静脉通路装置(TIVAD)。结果3.8%的患者出现并发症,不同血管通路之间总体上没有差异。直接穿刺与更多的意外动脉穿刺有关(p = 0.01)。曾使用过导管是导致即刻并发症的一个风险因素(p = 0.01),而有胸腔疾病史的患者有更多的早期和晚期并发症(分别为 p = 0.03 和 p = 0.04)。结论两种植入技术的总体并发症发生率没有差异。进一步的前瞻性随机对照试验将明确最有效的技术。
{"title":"Totally implantable venous access devices: A restrospective analysis of morbidity and risk factors in a hospital with multi-technique approaches","authors":"Diogo Melo-Pinto ,&nbsp;Tatiana Moreira-Marques ,&nbsp;Emanuel Guerreiro ,&nbsp;Marina Morais","doi":"10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100237","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100237","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Totally implantable venous central access devices (TIVADs) can be implanted by open surgery or by direct puncture in the subclavian (ScV), internal jugular (IJV) or cephalic (CephV) veins.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective study was conducted in 201 patients. Thirty-day follow-up data was analyzed to compare the outcomes of different techniques and evaluation of risk factors.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Complications were reported in 3.8 % of the patients with no overall differences between different vascular accesses. Direct puncture was associated with more accidental arterial punction (<em>p</em> = 0.01). History of previous catheters was a risk factor for immediate complications (<em>p</em> = 0.01) and patients with history of thoracic disease had more early and late complications (<em>p</em> = 0.03 and <em>p</em> = 0.04, respectively). Late complications were more common in patients over 60 years old (<em>p</em> = 0.04) and with chronic pain (<em>p</em> = 0.03).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There was no difference in overall complication rates between the implantation techniques. Further prospective randomized controlled trials would clarify the most effective technique.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74890,"journal":{"name":"Surgery in practice and science","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100237"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262024000044/pdfft?md5=4a2c892ebed4924920e701b37020f8a4&pid=1-s2.0-S2666262024000044-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139823048","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Donor hepatitis C status is not associated with an increased risk of acute rejection in kidney transplantation 供体丙型肝炎状态与肾移植急性排斥反应风险增加无关
Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-02-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100236
John C. Johnson , Trine Engebretsen , Muhammad Mujtaba , Heather L Stevenson , Rupak Kulkarni , A. Scott Lea , Akshata Moghe , Syed Hussain , Michael Kueht

Introduction

In renal transplantation, donor hepatitis C virus (HCV) status is crucial to consider when selecting a recipient given the high likelihood of transmission. We analyzed the effect of donor HCV status on post-renal transplant rejection and virologic infectious outcomes using electronic health record data from multiple US health care organizations.

Methods

Using real world data from electronic health records of renal transplant recipients, a propensity score-matched case-control study of one-year renal transplant outcomes was conducted on cohorts of HCV-negative recipients who received an organ from an HCV-positive donor (HCV D+/R-) versus from an HCV-negative donor (HCV D-/R-). Donor HCV positivity was defined as new recipient HCV positivity within 30 days post-transplant. Cohorts were matched by major risk factors for rejection including age, gender, race, etiologies of end-stage renal disease, dialysis dependence, donor type, induction immunosuppression, and virologic lab studies. The primary outcome was one-year incidence of rejection. Secondary outcomes included longitudinal measures of liver and kidney function, incidence of non-HCV viremia, and DAA treatment pathways and responses.

Results

Data from 900 renal transplant recipients were analyzed, 450 subjects per group (D+/R-, D-/R-). Mean age at transplant was 57.1 ± 11.9 years, 60 % were male, and 38 % were African American. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significantly increased incidence of one-year rejection for HCV D-/R- compared to HCV D+/R- (16.6% vs 22.8 %, p = 0.02). This difference did not persist on a sub-analysis excluding subjects with delayed graft function (DGF) (16.3% vs 19.2 %, p = 0.25). Although mean eGFR was initially higher in HCV D+/R-, there were no significant differences in liver or kidney allograft function at 12 months. There was no significant difference for composite viremia (CMV/EBV/BK; 37.66% vs 31.60 %, p = 0.07). The most common DAA regimen was glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (52.8 %). DAA treatment responses were excellent, with most subjects having a negative viral load by 90 days (mean: 1.7 ± 1.9 log units/mL).

Conclusion

Donor HCV positivity did not negatively impact one-year rejection outcomes post-renal transplantation. Importantly, this effect was not biased by age. Anti-HCV treatment was effective and liver and kidney function were excellent at one-year post-transplant. These data support the continued expansion of the donor pool by utilizing organs from HCV-positive donors in the era of anti-HCV direct-acting antiviral therapies.

导言:在肾移植手术中,由于丙型肝炎病毒 (HCV) 传播的可能性很高,因此在选择受体时必须考虑供体的丙型肝炎病毒 (HCV) 感染情况。我们利用美国多家医疗机构的电子健康记录数据分析了供体丙型肝炎病毒感染状况对肾移植术后排斥反应和病毒学感染结果的影响。方法利用肾移植受者电子健康记录中的真实数据,对接受来自 HCV 阳性供体(HCV D+/R-)和来自 HCV 阴性供体(HCV D-/R-)的器官的 HCV 阴性受者队列进行了倾向得分匹配病例对照研究,以了解一年的肾移植结果。供体 HCV 阳性定义为移植后 30 天内新的受体 HCV 阳性。根据排斥反应的主要风险因素(包括年龄、性别、种族、终末期肾病病因、透析依赖性、供体类型、诱导免疫抑制和病毒学实验室研究)对组群进行配对。主要结果是一年的排斥反应发生率。次要结果包括肝肾功能的纵向测量、非HCV病毒血症的发生率以及DAA治疗途径和反应。结果分析了900名肾移植受者的数据,每组450人(D+/R-、D-/R-)。移植时的平均年龄为 57.1 ± 11.9 岁,60% 为男性,38% 为非裔美国人。Kaplan-Meier 分析显示,与 HCV D+/R- 相比,HCV D-/R- 一年期排斥反应发生率明显增加(16.6% vs 22.8%,p = 0.02)。在排除移植物功能延迟(DGF)受试者(16.3% vs 19.2%,p = 0.25)的子分析中,这一差异并没有持续存在。虽然 HCV D+/R- 患者的平均 eGFR 最初较高,但 12 个月后肝脏或肾脏的异体移植功能没有显著差异。复合病毒血症(CMV/EBV/BK;37.66% vs 31.60%,p = 0.07)无明显差异。最常见的 DAA 方案是 glecaprevir/pibrentasvir(52.8%)。DAA治疗反应良好,大多数受试者的病毒载量在90天后呈阴性(平均:1.7 ± 1.9 log units/mL)。重要的是,这种影响不受年龄的影响。抗HCV治疗有效,移植后一年肝肾功能良好。这些数据支持在抗HCV直接作用抗病毒疗法时代利用HCV阳性供体的器官继续扩大供体库。
{"title":"Donor hepatitis C status is not associated with an increased risk of acute rejection in kidney transplantation","authors":"John C. Johnson ,&nbsp;Trine Engebretsen ,&nbsp;Muhammad Mujtaba ,&nbsp;Heather L Stevenson ,&nbsp;Rupak Kulkarni ,&nbsp;A. Scott Lea ,&nbsp;Akshata Moghe ,&nbsp;Syed Hussain ,&nbsp;Michael Kueht","doi":"10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100236","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100236","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>In renal transplantation, donor hepatitis C virus (HCV) status is crucial to consider when selecting a recipient given the high likelihood of transmission. We analyzed the effect of donor HCV status on post-renal transplant rejection and virologic infectious outcomes using electronic health record data from multiple US health care organizations.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using real world data from electronic health records of renal transplant recipients, a propensity score-matched case-control study of one-year renal transplant outcomes was conducted on cohorts of HCV-negative recipients who received an organ from an HCV-positive donor (HCV D+/R-) versus from an HCV-negative donor (HCV D-/R-). Donor HCV positivity was defined as new recipient HCV positivity within 30 days post-transplant. Cohorts were matched by major risk factors for rejection including age, gender, race, etiologies of end-stage renal disease, dialysis dependence, donor type, induction immunosuppression, and virologic lab studies. The primary outcome was one-year incidence of rejection. Secondary outcomes included longitudinal measures of liver and kidney function, incidence of non-HCV viremia, and DAA treatment pathways and responses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Data from 900 renal transplant recipients were analyzed, 450 subjects per group (D+/R-, <span>D</span>-/R-). Mean age at transplant was 57.1 ± 11.9 years, 60 % were male, and 38 % were African American. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significantly increased incidence of one-year rejection for HCV <span>D</span>-/R- compared to HCV D+/R- (16.6% vs 22.8 %, <em>p</em> = 0.02). This difference did not persist on a sub-analysis excluding subjects with delayed graft function (DGF) (16.3% vs 19.2 %, <em>p</em> = 0.25). Although mean eGFR was initially higher in HCV D+/R-, there were no significant differences in liver or kidney allograft function at 12 months. There was no significant difference for composite viremia (CMV/EBV/BK; 37.66% vs 31.60 %, <em>p</em> = 0.07). The most common DAA regimen was glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (52.8 %). DAA treatment responses were excellent, with most subjects having a negative viral load by 90 days (mean: 1.7 ± 1.9 log units/mL).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Donor HCV positivity did not negatively impact one-year rejection outcomes post-renal transplantation. Importantly, this effect was not biased by age. Anti-HCV treatment was effective and liver and kidney function were excellent at one-year post-transplant. These data support the continued expansion of the donor pool by utilizing organs from HCV-positive donors in the era of anti-HCV direct-acting antiviral therapies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74890,"journal":{"name":"Surgery in practice and science","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100236"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262024000032/pdfft?md5=6c27ad30bf0f26896a955d37f73b7c63&pid=1-s2.0-S2666262024000032-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139718263","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Variation in approach for midsize (4-6cm) ventral hernias across a statewide quality improvement collaborative 全州质量改进合作组织在治疗中等大小(4-6 厘米)腹股沟疝气方法上的差异
Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-01-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100235
Anne P. Ehlers , Alex K. Hallway , Sean M. O'Neill , Brian T. Fry , Ryan A. Howard , Jenny M. Shao , Michael J. Englesbe , Justin B Dimick , Dana A Telem , Grace J Kim

Introduction

Repair of midsize (4–6 cm) ventral hernias is challenging given lack of guidelines. Within this context, we sought to characterize surgical approach among patients undergoing repair of midsize ventral hernias within the only population-level, clinically-nuanced hernia registry in the US.

Methods

Retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing ventral hernia repair in the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative Core Optimization Hernia Registry (MSQCCOHR). MSQCCOHR is the only US population-level registry that captures clinically-nuanced data pertaining to patient hernia characteristics. We included patients who underwent repair of a 4–6 cm hernia from January 1, 2020-June 30, 2022. We stratified repair type as open or minimally invasive and used a multivariable logistic regression model to identify factors associated with MIS approach. Secondary outcomes included complications rate.

Results

Among 771 patients, mean hernia width (SD) was 4.7 cm (0.8) and 339 (44 %) underwent MIS approach. Patients with MIS approach had lower BMI (33.5 vs 34.8, p = 0.02) and less often were ASA class III (47.5% vs 54.6 %, p = 0.02) or ASA class IV (2.4% vs 4.2 %, p = 0.02). MIS approach was associated with smaller mean hernia width (4.71 cm vs 4.84 cm, p = 0.02) and was used more often in the elective setting (94.4% vs 84.0 %, p < 0.01). In the multivariable logistic regression model, higher BMI (aOR 0.97, 95 % CI 0.94–0.99) and urgent/emergent surgery (aOR 0.43, 95 % CI 0.24–0.79) were associated with lower odds of MIS. We found no significant association between MIS and risk of complications (aOR 0.62, 95 % CI 0.37–1.04). Among patients undergoing MIS, more than half (n = 236, 69.6 %) had a robotic approach but there were few patient factors associated with this.

Conclusion

Among patients with midsize hernias, few patient-level factors are associated with approach. This may indicate that surgeon preference factors largely into this decision.

导言:由于缺乏相关指南,中型(4-6 厘米)腹股沟疝的修补具有挑战性。在这种情况下,我们试图在美国唯一的人口级临床平衡疝气登记处对接受中型腹股沟疝修补术的患者的手术方法进行特征分析。方法对密歇根州外科质量协作核心优化疝气登记处(MSQCCOHR)中接受腹股沟疝修补术的患者进行回顾性队列研究。MSQCCOHR 是美国唯一的人口级注册机构,可获取与患者疝气特征相关的临床平衡数据。我们纳入了 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 6 月 30 日期间接受 4-6 厘米疝修补术的患者。我们将修复类型分为开放式和微创式,并使用多变量逻辑回归模型确定与微创式方法相关的因素。结果771名患者中,疝的平均宽度(标清)为4.7厘米(0.8),339人(44%)接受了MIS方法。采用 MIS 方法的患者体重指数较低(33.5 vs 34.8,P = 0.02),ASA III 级(47.5% vs 54.6%,P = 0.02)或 ASA IV 级(2.4% vs 4.2%,P = 0.02)的患者较少。MIS 方法与疝的平均宽度较小(4.71 厘米 vs 4.84 厘米,p = 0.02)有关,且更多用于择期手术(94.4% vs 84.0%,p <0.01)。在多变量逻辑回归模型中,较高的体重指数(aOR 0.97,95 % CI 0.94-0.99)和紧急/急诊手术(aOR 0.43,95 % CI 0.24-0.79)与较低的 MIS 几率相关。我们发现 MIS 与并发症风险(aOR 0.62,95 % CI 0.37-1.04)之间无明显关联。在接受 MIS 的患者中,半数以上(n = 236,69.6%)采用了机器人手术方法,但与此相关的患者因素很少。结论在中型疝气患者中,患者层面的因素很少与手术方式相关,这可能表明外科医生的偏好在很大程度上影响了患者的决定。
{"title":"Variation in approach for midsize (4-6cm) ventral hernias across a statewide quality improvement collaborative","authors":"Anne P. Ehlers ,&nbsp;Alex K. Hallway ,&nbsp;Sean M. O'Neill ,&nbsp;Brian T. Fry ,&nbsp;Ryan A. Howard ,&nbsp;Jenny M. Shao ,&nbsp;Michael J. Englesbe ,&nbsp;Justin B Dimick ,&nbsp;Dana A Telem ,&nbsp;Grace J Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100235","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100235","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Repair of midsize (4–6 cm) ventral hernias is challenging given lack of guidelines. Within this context, we sought to characterize surgical approach among patients undergoing repair of midsize ventral hernias within the only population-level, clinically-nuanced hernia registry in the US.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing ventral hernia repair in the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative Core Optimization Hernia Registry (MSQC<img>COHR). MSQC<img>COHR is the only US population-level registry that captures clinically-nuanced data pertaining to patient hernia characteristics. We included patients who underwent repair of a 4–6 cm hernia from January 1, 2020-June 30, 2022. We stratified repair type as open or minimally invasive and used a multivariable logistic regression model to identify factors associated with MIS approach. Secondary outcomes included complications rate.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 771 patients, mean hernia width (SD) was 4.7 cm (0.8) and 339 (44 %) underwent MIS approach. Patients with MIS approach had lower BMI (33.5 vs 34.8, <em>p</em> = 0.02) and less often were ASA class III (47.5% vs 54.6 %, <em>p</em> = 0.02) or ASA class IV (2.4% vs 4.2 %, <em>p</em> = 0.02). MIS approach was associated with smaller mean hernia width (4.71 cm vs 4.84 cm, <em>p</em> = 0.02) and was used more often in the elective setting (94.4% vs 84.0 %, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01). In the multivariable logistic regression model, higher BMI (aOR 0.97, 95 % CI 0.94–0.99) and urgent/emergent surgery (aOR 0.43, 95 % CI 0.24–0.79) were associated with lower odds of MIS. We found no significant association between MIS and risk of complications (aOR 0.62, 95 % CI 0.37–1.04). Among patients undergoing MIS, more than half (<em>n</em> = 236, 69.6 %) had a robotic approach but there were few patient factors associated with this.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Among patients with midsize hernias, few patient-level factors are associated with approach. This may indicate that surgeon preference factors largely into this decision.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74890,"journal":{"name":"Surgery in practice and science","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100235"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262024000020/pdfft?md5=61bbd733875b6999ed02afb740eb4712&pid=1-s2.0-S2666262024000020-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139635958","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Delayed return of bowel function after general surgery in South Australia 南澳大利亚州普外科手术后肠道功能延迟恢复情况
Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-01-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100234
Joshua G. Kovoor , Stephen Bacchi , Brandon Stretton , Aashray K. Gupta , Jonathan Henry W. Jacobsen , Minh-Son To , Rudy Goh , Joseph N. Hewitt , Christopher D. Ovenden , Leigh Warren , Matthew Marshall-Webb , Karen L. Jones , Benjamin A. Reddi , Danny Liew , Christopher Dobbins , Robert T. Padbury , Peter J. Hewett , Thomas J. Hugh , Markus I. Trochsler , Guy J. Maddern

Introduction

Reference ranges for determining pathological versus normal postoperative return of bowel function are not well characterised for general surgery patients. This study aimed to characterise time to first postoperative passage of stool after general surgery; determine associations between clinical factors and delayed time to first postoperative stool; and evaluate the association between delay to first postoperative stool and prolonged length of hospital stay.

Methods

This study included consecutive admissions at two tertiary hospitals across a two-year period whom underwent a range of general surgery operations. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine associations between the explanatory variables and delayed first postoperative stool, and between delayed first postoperative stool and length of hospital stay. The previously specified explanatory variables were used, with the addition of the dichotomised ≥4-day delay to first postoperative stool. Prolonged length of hospital stay was considered ≥7 days.

Results

2,212 general surgery patients were included. Median time to first postoperative stool was 2.28 (IQR 1.06–3.96). Median length of stay was 7.19 (IQR 4.50–12.01). Several operative characteristics and medication exposures were associated with delayed first postoperative stool. There was a statistically significant association between delayed first postoperative stool (≥4 days) and prolonged length of stay (≥7 days) (OR 4.34, 95 %CI 3.27 to 5.77, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

This study characterised expected reference ranges for time to return of bowel function across various general surgery operations and determined associations with clinical factors that may improve efficiency and identification of pathology within the postoperative course.

导言:普外科患者术后肠道功能恢复的病理与正常的参考范围尚未明确。本研究旨在描述普外科术后首次排便时间的特征;确定临床因素与术后首次排便时间延迟之间的关联;评估术后首次排便时间延迟与住院时间延长之间的关联。方法本研究纳入了两家三甲医院在两年内连续收治的接受一系列普外科手术的患者。通过多变量逻辑回归分析确定解释变量与术后首次排便延迟之间的关系,以及术后首次排便延迟与住院时间之间的关系。在使用之前指定的解释变量的基础上,增加了术后首次大便延迟≥4 天的二分变量。住院时间延长被视为≥7天。术后首次排便的中位时间为 2.28(IQR 1.06-3.96)。住院时间中位数为 7.19(IQR 4.50-12.01)。一些手术特征和药物暴露与术后首次排便延迟有关。该研究确定了各种普外科手术肠道功能恢复时间的预期参考范围,并确定了与临床因素的关联,这些临床因素可提高效率并在术后病理过程中进行识别。
{"title":"Delayed return of bowel function after general surgery in South Australia","authors":"Joshua G. Kovoor ,&nbsp;Stephen Bacchi ,&nbsp;Brandon Stretton ,&nbsp;Aashray K. Gupta ,&nbsp;Jonathan Henry W. Jacobsen ,&nbsp;Minh-Son To ,&nbsp;Rudy Goh ,&nbsp;Joseph N. Hewitt ,&nbsp;Christopher D. Ovenden ,&nbsp;Leigh Warren ,&nbsp;Matthew Marshall-Webb ,&nbsp;Karen L. Jones ,&nbsp;Benjamin A. Reddi ,&nbsp;Danny Liew ,&nbsp;Christopher Dobbins ,&nbsp;Robert T. Padbury ,&nbsp;Peter J. Hewett ,&nbsp;Thomas J. Hugh ,&nbsp;Markus I. Trochsler ,&nbsp;Guy J. Maddern","doi":"10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100234","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100234","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Reference ranges for determining pathological versus normal postoperative return of bowel function are not well characterised for general surgery patients. This study aimed to characterise time to first postoperative passage of stool after general surgery; determine associations between clinical factors and delayed time to first postoperative stool; and evaluate the association between delay to first postoperative stool and prolonged length of hospital stay.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study included consecutive admissions at two tertiary hospitals across a two-year period whom underwent a range of general surgery operations. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine associations between the explanatory variables and delayed first postoperative stool, and between delayed first postoperative stool and length of hospital stay. The previously specified explanatory variables were used, with the addition of the dichotomised ≥4-day delay to first postoperative stool. Prolonged length of hospital stay was considered ≥7 days.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>2,212 general surgery patients were included. Median time to first postoperative stool was 2.28 (IQR 1.06–3.96). Median length of stay was 7.19 (IQR 4.50–12.01). Several operative characteristics and medication exposures were associated with delayed first postoperative stool. There was a statistically significant association between delayed first postoperative stool (≥4 days) and prolonged length of stay (≥7 days) (OR 4.34, 95 %CI 3.27 to 5.77, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study characterised expected reference ranges for time to return of bowel function across various general surgery operations and determined associations with clinical factors that may improve efficiency and identification of pathology within the postoperative course.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74890,"journal":{"name":"Surgery in practice and science","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100234"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262024000019/pdfft?md5=cdaebfe647c445c684835b5ed7869716&pid=1-s2.0-S2666262024000019-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139434624","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A retrospective cohort study of the effect of sugammadex versus neostigmine on postoperative gastrointestinal motility in open colorectal surgical procedures 苏甘比与新斯的明对开放式结直肠手术术后胃肠道运动影响的回顾性队列研究
Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2023-12-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100233
Taylor N. Harris , Eric G. Johnson , Aric Schadler , Jitesh Patel , Ekaterina Fain , Laura M. Ebbitt

Introduction

Neuromuscular blockers (NMB) are used in surgical procedures to facilitate muscle relaxation and intubation. NMBs are then reversed at the end of the surgery with either an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, such as neostigmine, or a modified cyclodextrin compound, such as sugammadex. Neostigmine and glycopyrrolate elicit counteracting cholinergic effects, potentially impairing postoperative gastrointestinal motility. This may have higher significance in colorectal surgery procedures given the baseline risk of delayed postoperative motility associated with some operations.

Methods

This is a retrospective, single-center, cohort review of open colorectal procedures that received either sugammadex alone, or neostigmine with glycopyrrolate. The primary outcome was time from end of colorectal procedure to time of first bowel movement. Secondary outcomes included incidence of postoperatively placed nasogastric tubes, nausea and vomiting, need for motility agents or TPN, hospital length of stay, 30-day hospital readmission or return to emergency department (ED).

Results

A total of 99 patients were included in the sugammadex group and 350 in the neostigmine + glycopyrrolate group. Time to first bowel movement was significantly faster in the sugammadex group (61.7 h) compared to the neostigmine group (71.9 h) (p = 0.03). Secondary outcomes were similar between the two groups, except for a higher incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in the sugammadex group (p = 0.04).

Discussion

These findings support that sugammadex may be utilized for open colorectal procedures to aid in earlier discharge which could lead to differences in length of stay. Using sugammadex did not result in patients requiring additional interventions or experiencing symptoms of post-operative ileus.

Conclusion

Compared to neostigmine and glycopyrrolate, patients receiving sugammadex for neuromuscular blockade reversal in open colorectal procedures experienced a shorter time to return of bowel function. The results from this study confirm the findings from previous retrospective studies that were conducted.

导言神经肌肉阻滞剂(NMB)用于外科手术,以促进肌肉松弛和插管。在手术结束时,NMB 会被乙酰胆碱酯酶抑制剂(如新斯的明)或改良环糊精化合物(如舒甘马定)逆转。新斯的明和甘草酸苷会产生对抗胆碱能的作用,可能会影响术后胃肠道的蠕动。这是一项回顾性、单中心、队列回顾性研究,研究对象是接受单独使用苏加麦司或新斯的明加甘草酸盐治疗的开放性结直肠手术。主要结果是从结肠直肠手术结束到首次排便的时间。次要结果包括术后放置鼻胃管的发生率、恶心和呕吐、对肠蠕动剂或 TPN 的需求、住院时间、30 天内再次入院或返回急诊科(ED)。与新斯的明组(71.9 小时)相比,苏加麦胺组首次排便时间(61.7 小时)明显更快(p = 0.03)。除了术后恶心和呕吐的发生率在苏甘麦克斯组较高外(p = 0.04),两组的次要结果相似。讨论这些研究结果支持苏甘麦克斯可用于开放式结直肠手术,以帮助患者提前出院,从而缩短住院时间。结论与新斯的明和甘草酸苷相比,在开放式结直肠手术中接受苏甘麦克斯逆转神经肌肉阻滞的患者恢复肠道功能的时间更短。这项研究的结果证实了之前进行的回顾性研究的结果。
{"title":"A retrospective cohort study of the effect of sugammadex versus neostigmine on postoperative gastrointestinal motility in open colorectal surgical procedures","authors":"Taylor N. Harris ,&nbsp;Eric G. Johnson ,&nbsp;Aric Schadler ,&nbsp;Jitesh Patel ,&nbsp;Ekaterina Fain ,&nbsp;Laura M. Ebbitt","doi":"10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100233","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100233","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Neuromuscular blockers (NMB) are used in surgical procedures to facilitate muscle relaxation and intubation. NMBs are then reversed at the end of the surgery with either an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, such as neostigmine, or a modified cyclodextrin compound, such as sugammadex. Neostigmine and glycopyrrolate elicit counteracting cholinergic effects, potentially impairing postoperative gastrointestinal motility. This may have higher significance in colorectal surgery procedures given the baseline risk of delayed postoperative motility associated with some operations.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is a retrospective, single-center, cohort review of open colorectal procedures that received either sugammadex alone, or neostigmine with glycopyrrolate. The primary outcome was time from end of colorectal procedure to time of first bowel movement. Secondary outcomes included incidence of postoperatively placed nasogastric tubes, nausea and vomiting, need for motility agents or TPN, hospital length of stay, 30-day hospital readmission or return to emergency department (ED).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 99 patients were included in the sugammadex group and 350 in the neostigmine + glycopyrrolate group. Time to first bowel movement was significantly faster in the sugammadex group (61.7 h) compared to the neostigmine group (71.9 h) (<em>p</em> = 0.03). Secondary outcomes were similar between the two groups, except for a higher incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in the sugammadex group (<em>p</em> = 0.04).</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>These findings support that sugammadex may be utilized for open colorectal procedures to aid in earlier discharge which could lead to differences in length of stay. Using sugammadex did not result in patients requiring additional interventions or experiencing symptoms of post-operative ileus.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Compared to neostigmine and glycopyrrolate, patients receiving sugammadex for neuromuscular blockade reversal in open colorectal procedures experienced a shorter time to return of bowel function. The results from this study confirm the findings from previous retrospective studies that were conducted.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74890,"journal":{"name":"Surgery in practice and science","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100233"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262023000797/pdfft?md5=a5a7b22dd1a4bea616ea77d980ee166d&pid=1-s2.0-S2666262023000797-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139099849","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Surgery in practice and science
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1