This study assessed the reliability of ChatGPT as a source of information on asthma, given the increasing use of artificial intelligence–driven models for medical information. Prior concerns about misinformation on atopic diseases in various digital platforms underline the importance of this evaluation.
We aimed to evaluate the scientific reliability of ChatGPT as a source of information on asthma.
The study involved analyzing ChatGPT’s responses to 26 asthma-related questions, each followed by a follow-up question. These encompassed definition/risk factors, diagnosis, treatment, lifestyle factors, and specific clinical inquiries. Medical professionals specialized in allergic and respiratory diseases independently assessed the responses using a 1-to-5 accuracy scale.
Approximately 81% of the responses scored 4 or higher, suggesting a generally high accuracy level. However, 5 responses scored >3, indicating minor potentially harmful inaccuracies. The overall median score was 4. Fleiss multirater kappa value showed moderate agreement among raters.
ChatGPT generally provides reliable asthma-related information, but its limitations, such as lack of depth in certain responses and inability to cite sources or update in real time, were noted. It shows promise as an educational tool, but it should not be a substitute for professional medical advice. Future studies should explore its applicability for different user demographics and compare it with newer artificial intelligence models.
Acidic oral environments may trigger systemic contact dermatitis via ionization of metals, including palladium. A patch test revealed a late delayed positive response to palladium, emphasizing the need for nuanced diagnostic approaches for allergy management.
The use of erythritol as a food sweetener has spread significantly from Japan throughout the world. We describe a case of severe anaphylaxis due to immediate-type allergy to erythritol that was diagnosed with in vitro basophil activation tests and in vivo skin tests.
A patient with GATA2 deficiency developed corticosteroid-responsive sterile granulomatous lung disease despite monocytopenia. The presence of B-lymphopenia, autoimmunity, an elevated level of serum B-cell–activating factor, and pulmonary plasma cell infiltration, which together suggested an underlying mechanism similar to that of combined variable immunodeficiency lung disease.
β-Lactams remain the most reported drug allergy globally, with the volume and diversity of related drug allergy research continuing to accumulate. Recognizing evolving research trends can help inform future directions and encourage synergistic collaborations.
We conducted a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of all publications relevant to β-lactam allergy, with a focus on longitudinal publication rates, international collaborations, and key word/trend analysis.
Meta-data from all original articles, letters, and reviews relevant to β-lactam allergy on the Web of Science Core Collection up until December 31, 2023, were analyzed.
From 1966 to 2023, there were 4451 records (3536 articles, 631 reviews, and 284 letters) from 78 countries. There was an exponential increase in publications, especially during the past decade, with half of all publications on β-lactam allergy published during this time (50.6% [2252 of 4452]). Overall, 18.1% of the publications (805 of 4452) involved international coauthorships, with a significant increase since the previous decade (12.7% vs 23.3% [P < .001]). The most frequent key words in the first published half of articles were skin testing (84 of 1919), IgE (57 of 1919), and anaphylaxis (49 of 1919); in contrast to the key word skin testing (137 of 3351), the key words drug provocation test (121 of 3351), antimicrobial resistance (120 of 3351), and antimicrobial stewardship (118 of 3351) were the most frequent key words in the latter half.
There has been a surge in publications, international collaboration, and shifting paradigms in β-lactam allergy research. The field has evolved beyond focusing on in vitro tests or desensitization toward antimicrobial stewardship. However, there still seems to be relatively fewer collaborations with non-Western countries. Further international collaborations to harmonize delabeling strategies against the threat of mislabeled β-lactam allergy should be encouraged.
Hymenoptera venom allergy is a public health issue and has an undeniable impact on quality of life. Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) has shown long-term efficacy in this severe and potentially lethal allergy. However, no biomarker can predict the effectiveness of this treatment.
We evaluated the contribution of IgE blocking activity, a functional biomarker carried out in our center using flow cytometry, to predict the efficacy of AIT.
This retrospective study from 1985 to 2022 describes in detail the demographic, clinical, and biological characteristics of patients who benefited from AIT with Hymenoptera venom at the University Hospital of Limoges. The outcome measure used was the presence of anaphylactic reaction (grade I to IV according to Ring and Messmer) in case of a new sting after discontinuation of AIT.
Our study, mainly composed of patients allergic to Vespula wasp venom, did not emphasize the interest of IgE blocking activity in the prediction of a relapse after a new sting. However, this inhibition showed a significant correlation with the amount of IgG4 antibodies.
There is no biomarker that can help make the decision of stopping AIT. However, low levels of IgE blocking activity may suggest a likelihood of relapse. Serum IgG4, in correlation with IgE blocking activity, could be useful for monitoring treatment response. Additional studies are necessary to gain a thorough understanding of the composition of inhibitory antibodies.
The American Thoracic Society has published general guidelines for sterility when testing for bronchodilator responsiveness. However, the extent to which practicing allergists implement sterility measures is currently unknown.
This study aims to understand the adherence to the American Thoracic Society guidelines for sterility among practicing allergists.
In 2015, a questionnaire was approved and distributed by the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology to all its members. The anonymous responses were recorded and tabulated after a 3-week period.
Of the 6800 allergists who received surveys from the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology members, 496 participated in the survey (response rate 7.3%). Using metered dose inhalers with a spacer and nebulizers were the most common bronchodilator administration techniques, as indicated by 59.35% and 58.52% of responses, respectively. Whereas 69.25% of the allergists considered their bronchodilator administration techniques to be sterile, 14.05% did not consider their administration technique to be sterile and 16.70% were unsure. For maintaining sterility, 38.75% of the respondents indicated using a new disposable attachment for reused inhalers, 18.71% indicated using a new inhaler for each patient, and 9.13% reported wiping inhalers with a cleaning agent.
When asked about the sterility of the techniques used by them, nearly one-third of the allergists either stated that the measures used by them were unsterile or stated that they were were unsure. To increase adherence to sterility measures among North American allergists, promoting guideline awareness and proposing updated guidelines focused on the most common bronchodilator administration techniques is essential.