The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM最新文献

Background: Social media remains a growing platform for physicians to facilitate learning, network, and disseminate information. The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has challenged traditional medical student recruitment and outreach. Instagram is a platform that can be used by residency programs to increase engagement and as a potential recruitment tool. The authors present social media failed and successful strategies used to increase engagement and gain new followers.

Methods: In June 2020, an initiative began to use Instagram on a more frequent and intentional basis. Three different strategies were implemented during the pandemic: mirroring Twitter posts, increasing multimedia, and leveraging Instagram Stories. The outcomes of interest included number of followers and engagement on posts. Data were collected October 2020.

Results: After June 1, 2020, the @mayoanesthesia account gained 1000 followers through 127 days, an average of 4.26 new followers each day. Before June 1, there were 24 total posts over 3.3 years with a total of 458 followers. Three different strategies were implemented at different times during the pandemic. During the mirroring Twitter posts period, the mean number of interactions per post was 14.5. During the second phase after separating the Twitter and Instagram strategy, the mean number of interactions per post increased to 57.8.

Conclusion: Residency programs can creatively, yet methodically, use Instagram posts to increase social media engagement during resident recruitment season during the COVID-19 pandemic and likely beyond.

Background: Junior faculty in academic medicine often struggle with establishing their careers, resulting in low promotion and high attrition rates. Fellows also grapple with the decision to pursue careers in academic medicine. We report on the implementation and evaluation of a novel faculty and fellows exchange program that promotes career development.

Methods: In 2017, the University of California San Francisco created a reciprocal faculty exchange program called the Visiting Scholars in Pediatric Anesthesia Program (ViSiPAP). ViSiPAP expanded to involve 17 institutions across the United States. Fellows from 3 of the institutions were paired with faculty mentors to create Fellow/Faculty ViSiPAP. An initial postparticipation survey was sent after each exchange, and a follow-up survey in 2020 assessed ViSiPAP's impact.

Results: Fifty-three faculty participated in ViSiPAP and gave 66 presentations, and 20 fellows from 3 institutions gave 20 presentations. The initial postparticipation survey response rate was 88%, and the follow-up survey response rate was 74%. Survey responses indicated that ViSiPAP enhanced fellow and faculty well-being, improved didactic conferences, and provided opportunities for networking and collaborating. The follow-up survey indicated that participation in ViSiPAP led to 45 online academic publications, 39 additional invited presentations, and 8 authorships in peer-reviewed academic journals.

Conclusions: ViSiPAP is a successful professional development program for both fellows and junior faculty in pediatric anesthesia. Our program successfully introduced the participants into the pediatric anesthesia community and jumpstarted academic careers. Participation in ViSiPAP led to increased scholarly output and assisted with faculty promotion. This combined fellow/faculty exchange program is a novel approach to professional development and is broadly applicable to other disciplines in academic medicine.

Background: Program directors (PDs) play a crucial role in the competitiveness of the residency selection process and in mentoring the next generation of physicians. With this mandate comes the need to evaluate PDs on their own academic performance. We aimed to evaluate the distinguishing characteristics of anesthesiology residency programs with a focus on academic productivity of PDs and to investigate how these characteristics affect the Doximity program rank.

Methods: We identified anesthesiology program rankings from 2019 Doximity standings and divided them into quartiles (Q1-Q4). PD academic history and bibliometric indices (H-index, number of publications and citations) were collected through program websites, PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) websites.

Results: A total of 152 active anesthesiology programs and PDs were identified across the United States. Among the 152 PDs, 32% (n = 49) were women and 68% (n = 103) were men. There were differences between the Q1 versus Q2 programs in all of the variables other than PDs' number of fellowships. However, Q2 versus Q3 and Q3 versus Q4 programs had fewer identified differences. Each of the assessed PDs' bibliometric indices showed weak correlation with the program rank; however, there were stronger correlated factors of program rank, such as the program's original ACGME accreditation date (rs = 0.5, P < .0001) and female resident percentage (rs = 0.36, P < .0001) with moderate positive correlation. Additionally, the program size (rs = 0.77, P < .0001) and the number of ACGME-approved fellowships provided by the program (rs = 0.75, P < .0001) had a very strong positive correlation.

Conclusion: This study shows that program rank in the growing field of anesthesiology correlates with program size, female residents' percentage, ACGME approval date, number of ACGME-approved fellowships, as well as PDs' research productivity.

Background: Fiberoptic intubation (FOI) is key in managing difficult airways. Good scope control increases efficiency and patient safety. Understanding the gap between novices and experts in scope control would help medical educators develop a feedback-based teaching approach for novices. We designed and used a checklist for evaluating the gap in fiberoptic scope control between novices and experts.

Methods: Twelve first-year anesthesiology residents (novice group) attended a lecture, followed by hands-on practice with a fiberoptic scope on a manikin. Five staff anesthesiologists (expert group) only did the hands-on practice. After practice, each participant was video-recorded while conducting an FOI on the manikin. Two senior anesthesiologists developed and used a 7-item checklist to assess the FOIs. Checklist scores and total times for FOIs were compared between groups using the Mann-Whitney U test. Internal consistency of the checklist items, interrater reliability, and the relationship between checklist score and total time for FOI were assessed with Cronbach alpha, Cohen kappa, and the Pearson correlation coefficient, respectively.

Results: Experts had higher checklist scores than novices (P = .0016). The item with the lowest success rate for novices (50%) was keeping the scope straight. Novices spent more time on the FOI than experts (P = .0005). Cronbach alpha, Cohen kappa, and the Pearson correlation coefficient were 0.8699, 0.75, and -0.9454, respectively.

Conclusions: Our checklist was used to detect differences in fiberoptic scope control skills between novices and experts. With a video-based assessment method, it can be used to develop a feedback-based teaching method for fiberoptic scope control.

From March to June of 2020, Montefiore Medical Center faced one of the most acute surges in hospital admissions and critical illness ever experienced in the United States due to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic. The pandemic had not yet spread to most of the country, and there was a relative deficit of knowledge regarding treatments, prognosis, and prevention of the virus, making this experience relatively unique and challenging. As part of a surge plan, our institution converted nonclinical spaces, such as conference rooms, to inpatient care settings and placed elective surgeries on hold to free up resources. A central deployment office suspended anesthesiology resident rotations and instead assigned them to intensive care settings based on need. For the Montefiore Medical Center Department of Anesthesiology, preserving its academic mission and commitment to Graduate Medical Education was essential. Adaptations included changing the residency rotation structure to biweekly, converting didactics online, ensuring adequate case numbers for graduating residents, actively pursuing wellness interventions, and prioritizing the safety of the residents caring for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In this brief report, the authors discuss solutions devised to maintain the quality of anesthesiology resident education and training as much as possible during the COVID-19 surge.

Background: Underserved sub-Saharan countries have 0.1 to 1.4 anesthesia providers per 100 000 citizens, below the Lancet Commission's target of 20 per 100 000 needed for safe surgery. Most of these anesthesia providers are nurse anesthetists, with anesthesiologists numbering as few as zero in some nations and 2 per 7 million in others, such as Sierra Leone. In this study, we compared 2 simulation-based techniques for training nurse anesthetists on the Universal Anaesthesia Machine Ventilator-rapid-cycle deliberate practice and mastery learning.

Methods: A 2-week Universal Anaesthesia Machine Ventilator course was administered to 17 participants in Sierra Leone. Seven were randomized to the rapid-cycle deliberate practice group and 10 to the mastery learning group. Participants underwent baseline and posttraining evaluations in 3 scenarios: general anesthesia, intraoperative power failure, and postoperative pulmonary edema. Performance was analyzed based on checklist performance scores and the number of times participants were stopped for a mistake. Statistical significance to 0.05 was determined with the Mann-Whitney U Test.

Results: Checklist performance scores did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. When the groups were combined, simulation-based training resulted in a statistically significant improvement in performance. The highest-frequency problem areas were preoxygenation, switching from spontaneous to mechanical ventilation, and executing appropriate treatment interventions for a postoperative emergency.

Conclusion: Both rapid-cycle deliberate practice and mastery learning are effective methods for simulation-based training to improve nurse anesthetist performance with the Universal Anaesthesia Machine Ventilator in 3 separate scenarios. The data did not indicate any difference between these methods; however, a larger sample size may support or refute our findings.

Background: Although approximately half of US medical students are now women, anesthesiology training programs have yet to achieve gender parity. Women trainees' experiences and needs, including those related to motherhood, are increasingly timely concerns for the field of anesthesiology. At present, limited data exists on the childbearing experiences of women physicians in anesthesiology training.

Methods: In March of 2018, we surveyed women members of the American Society of Anesthesiologists via email. Questions addressed pregnancy, maternity leave, lactation, and motherhood. We analyzed data from a subset of respondents who were pregnant or had children during training and graduated in the year 2000 or later.

Results: A total of 542 respondents who completed training in the year 2000 or after reported 752 pregnancies during anesthesia training. A maternity leave had a median length of 7 weeks and did not change significantly over time. During many pregnancies, women felt their leave was inadequate (59.6%) or felt discouraged from taking more time off (65.7%). Pregnancy and associated leave extended graduation from training in 64.1% of cases. In approximately half of pregnancies (51.3%), women met desired breastfeeding duration, with access to designated lactation space decreasing significantly over time (false-discovery adjusted P = .0004). Trainee mothers often felt discouraged from having children (51.6%) or perceived negative stigma surrounding pregnancy (60.3%). These attitudes did not change over time or in relation to female program leadership.

Conclusions: Women anesthesiology trainees commonly face obstacles when attempting to balance work and motherhood. Recent policy changes have addressed some of the challenges identified in our study. Future studies will need to evaluate how these changes have impacted anesthesiology trainees.